新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 1956-1964.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.016
• 园艺特产·种质资源·贮藏保鲜加工·土壤肥料 • 上一篇 下一篇
樊丁宇(), 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 杨磊, 赵晓梅, 郝庆(
)
收稿日期:
2021-01-04
出版日期:
2022-08-20
发布日期:
2022-10-01
通信作者:
郝庆(1969-),男,新疆阿克苏人,研究员,研究方向为特色果树栽培。(E-mail) haoqingxj@sohu.com作者简介:
樊丁宇(1983-),男,山西忻州人,副研究员,研究方向为果树栽培与生理。(E-mail) fandingyu2413@163.com
基金资助:
FAN Dingyu(), JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, HAO Qing(
)
Received:
2021-01-04
Published:
2022-08-20
Online:
2022-10-01
Correspondence author:
HAO Qing (1969-),male,Aksu, Xinjiang, research fellow, Research area: the cultivation and technology promotion of characteristic fruit trees in Xinjiang. (E-mail) haoqingxj@sohu.comSupported by:
摘要:
【目的】综合评价鲜食枣品种果实品质特征,为筛选适合新疆生产且有推广价值的优良鲜枣品种选择和选育提供科学依据。【方法】以新疆阿克苏地区5个鲜食枣品种脆熟期的果实为材料,利用石蜡切片法观察枣果皮解剖结构,测定枣品种果实品质,根据主成分分析结果计算各品种综合得分。【结果】不同鲜食枣果实品质指标中总酸、蜡质层厚度、角质层厚度、亚表皮层厚度,而其他指标之间均存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。品质性状因子间有24个达到显著性相关,其中淀粉与原果胶的相关性系数为0.970。彼此不相关的4个主成分,其累积贡献率为96.606%,综合评价排序为蟠枣>冬枣>乳脆蜜>伏脆蜜>赛蜜酥。【结论】5个鲜食枣品种中蟠枣的综合得分分值最高,且综合品质性状表现比其他品种好。
中图分类号:
樊丁宇, 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 杨磊, 赵晓梅, 郝庆. 5个鲜食枣品种果实品质特性的综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1956-1964.
FAN Dingyu, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, HAO Qing. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality Characteristics of 5 Fresh Jujube Varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1956-1964.
测定指标 Measurement index | 赛蜜酥 Saimisu | 冬枣 Dongzao | 伏脆蜜 Fucuimi | 乳脆蜜 Rucuimi | 蟠枣 Panzao |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
纵径 Longitudinal diameter(mm) | 32.56±0.21 c | 30.64±0.45 d | 29.99±0.06 d | 42.49±0.77 a | 37.29±0.21 b |
横径 Transverse diameter(mm) | 29.45±0.07 b | 29.42±0.46 b | 27.21±0.23 c | 21.69±0.15 d | 44.57±0.36 a |
单果重 Single fruit weight(g) | 13.30±0.06 c | 13.88±0.06 b | 11.32±0.01 d | 10.63±0.01 e | 36.60±0.38 a |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(mg/g) | 252.82±1.97 d | 243.96±1.79 e | 264.29±1.56 c | 280.84±1.92 a | 270.23±1.39 b |
葡萄糖 Glucose(mg/g) | 58.01±0.11 b | 51.57±0.26 d | 55.11±0.06 c | 47.18±0.19 e | 65.64±0.30 a |
果糖 Fructose(mg/g) | 71.59±0.78 d | 68.82±0.68 e | 74.31±0.21 c | 103.2±0.85 a | 87.62±0.11 b |
蔗糖 Sucrose(mg/g) | 87.86±0.57 c | 93.28±0.95 b | 95.41±0.19 a | 92.43±0.19 b | 93.10±0.45 b |
淀粉 Starch(mg/g) | 47.77±0.46 b | 41.16±0.32 c | 40.46±0.27 c | 57.18±0.39 a | 48.22±0.18 b |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids(%) | 29.15±0.14 b | 27.53±0.24 d | 30.50±0.62 a | 26.67±0.26 c | 28.60±0.06 c |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein(mg/g) | 121.84±0.35 c | 158.18±0.69 b | 107.85±1.15 e | 112.63±0.57 d | 181.63±0.40 a |
维生素C Vc(mg/g) | 2.05±0.04 a | 0.97±0.02 d | 1.58±0.02 b | 0.82±0.01 e | 1.15±0.01 c |
总酸Total acid | 0.27±0.01 b | 0.27±0 b | 0.27±0 b | 0.27±0 b | 0.33±0 a |
苹果酸 Malic acid(mg/g) | 2.42±0.03 c | 2.65±0.02 b | 2.62±0.01 b | 3.69±0.0 a | 2.30±0.01 d |
柠檬酸 Citric acid(mg/g) | 0.62±0 c | 0.57±0 d | 1.07±0 b | 0.46±0 e | 2.09±0.03 a |
类黄酮 Flavonoid(mg/g) | 1.97±0.02 c | 3.74±0.03 a | 2.16±0.02 b | 2.15±0.02 b | 1.74±0.02 d |
纤维素 Cellulose(mg/g) | 140.29±0.95 c | 178.56±0.66 a | 136.20±1.85 d | 144.04±1.20 c | 160.73±1.33 b |
半纤维素 Hemicellulose(mg/g) | 102.62±0.39 a | 74.40±0.84 c | 93.37±0.27 b | 63.65±0.43 d | 64.07±0.92 d |
原果胶 Protopectin(mg/g) | 17.62±0.11 b | 13.40±0.47 d | 12.62±0.28 d | 21.04±0.20 a | 16.13±0.48 c |
可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin(mg/g) | 65.97±2.24 d | 113.82±2.27 b | 105.32±2.76 c | 113.54±3.17 b | 146.67±1.92 a |
果胶酶 Pectinase (U/g) | 18.28±0.33 d | 20.30±0.21 c | 15.20±0.08 f | 29.57±0.24 a | 24.70±0.26 b |
纤维素酶 Cellulase(mg /min/g) | 10.29±0.07 e | 13.85±0.06 c | 11.81±0.12 d | 15.24±0.18 b | 18.49±0.10 a |
多酚氧化酶 Polyphenol oxidase(U/g) | 46.86±0.58 b | 29.84±1.05 d | 74.06±1.08 a | 37.35±0.35 c | 29.00±0.46 d |
蜡质层厚度 Thickness of wax layer(μm) | 6.07±0.27 c | 8.80±0.18 a | 6.39±0.14 c | 7.93±0.20 b | 8.64±0.13 a |
角质层厚度 Cuticle thickness(μm) | 7.59±0.18 bc | 8.14±0.22 ab | 8.61±0.05 a | 8.35±0.17 ab | 7.09±0.44 c |
表皮层厚度 Epidermis thickness(μm) | 12.89±0.17 d | 52.57±1.40 a | 16.45±1.73 d | 31.84±2.52 b | 25.07±1.56 c |
亚表皮层厚度 Subcortical thickness(μm) | 27.08±1.36 b | 39.38±3.16 a | 32.53±1.08 ab | 29.62±1.52 b | 39.61±3.02 a |
表皮层层数Number of epidermis layers | 2 | 3~5 | 1~3 | 3~5 | 3~5 |
亚表皮层层数 Number of subepidermal layers | 1~2 | 2~3 | 2 | 1~3 | 2~3 |
表 1 不同鲜食枣果实品质及果皮结构差异比较
Table 1 Comparison of fruit quality and pericarp structure of different fresh jujubes
测定指标 Measurement index | 赛蜜酥 Saimisu | 冬枣 Dongzao | 伏脆蜜 Fucuimi | 乳脆蜜 Rucuimi | 蟠枣 Panzao |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
纵径 Longitudinal diameter(mm) | 32.56±0.21 c | 30.64±0.45 d | 29.99±0.06 d | 42.49±0.77 a | 37.29±0.21 b |
横径 Transverse diameter(mm) | 29.45±0.07 b | 29.42±0.46 b | 27.21±0.23 c | 21.69±0.15 d | 44.57±0.36 a |
单果重 Single fruit weight(g) | 13.30±0.06 c | 13.88±0.06 b | 11.32±0.01 d | 10.63±0.01 e | 36.60±0.38 a |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(mg/g) | 252.82±1.97 d | 243.96±1.79 e | 264.29±1.56 c | 280.84±1.92 a | 270.23±1.39 b |
葡萄糖 Glucose(mg/g) | 58.01±0.11 b | 51.57±0.26 d | 55.11±0.06 c | 47.18±0.19 e | 65.64±0.30 a |
果糖 Fructose(mg/g) | 71.59±0.78 d | 68.82±0.68 e | 74.31±0.21 c | 103.2±0.85 a | 87.62±0.11 b |
蔗糖 Sucrose(mg/g) | 87.86±0.57 c | 93.28±0.95 b | 95.41±0.19 a | 92.43±0.19 b | 93.10±0.45 b |
淀粉 Starch(mg/g) | 47.77±0.46 b | 41.16±0.32 c | 40.46±0.27 c | 57.18±0.39 a | 48.22±0.18 b |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids(%) | 29.15±0.14 b | 27.53±0.24 d | 30.50±0.62 a | 26.67±0.26 c | 28.60±0.06 c |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein(mg/g) | 121.84±0.35 c | 158.18±0.69 b | 107.85±1.15 e | 112.63±0.57 d | 181.63±0.40 a |
维生素C Vc(mg/g) | 2.05±0.04 a | 0.97±0.02 d | 1.58±0.02 b | 0.82±0.01 e | 1.15±0.01 c |
总酸Total acid | 0.27±0.01 b | 0.27±0 b | 0.27±0 b | 0.27±0 b | 0.33±0 a |
苹果酸 Malic acid(mg/g) | 2.42±0.03 c | 2.65±0.02 b | 2.62±0.01 b | 3.69±0.0 a | 2.30±0.01 d |
柠檬酸 Citric acid(mg/g) | 0.62±0 c | 0.57±0 d | 1.07±0 b | 0.46±0 e | 2.09±0.03 a |
类黄酮 Flavonoid(mg/g) | 1.97±0.02 c | 3.74±0.03 a | 2.16±0.02 b | 2.15±0.02 b | 1.74±0.02 d |
纤维素 Cellulose(mg/g) | 140.29±0.95 c | 178.56±0.66 a | 136.20±1.85 d | 144.04±1.20 c | 160.73±1.33 b |
半纤维素 Hemicellulose(mg/g) | 102.62±0.39 a | 74.40±0.84 c | 93.37±0.27 b | 63.65±0.43 d | 64.07±0.92 d |
原果胶 Protopectin(mg/g) | 17.62±0.11 b | 13.40±0.47 d | 12.62±0.28 d | 21.04±0.20 a | 16.13±0.48 c |
可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin(mg/g) | 65.97±2.24 d | 113.82±2.27 b | 105.32±2.76 c | 113.54±3.17 b | 146.67±1.92 a |
果胶酶 Pectinase (U/g) | 18.28±0.33 d | 20.30±0.21 c | 15.20±0.08 f | 29.57±0.24 a | 24.70±0.26 b |
纤维素酶 Cellulase(mg /min/g) | 10.29±0.07 e | 13.85±0.06 c | 11.81±0.12 d | 15.24±0.18 b | 18.49±0.10 a |
多酚氧化酶 Polyphenol oxidase(U/g) | 46.86±0.58 b | 29.84±1.05 d | 74.06±1.08 a | 37.35±0.35 c | 29.00±0.46 d |
蜡质层厚度 Thickness of wax layer(μm) | 6.07±0.27 c | 8.80±0.18 a | 6.39±0.14 c | 7.93±0.20 b | 8.64±0.13 a |
角质层厚度 Cuticle thickness(μm) | 7.59±0.18 bc | 8.14±0.22 ab | 8.61±0.05 a | 8.35±0.17 ab | 7.09±0.44 c |
表皮层厚度 Epidermis thickness(μm) | 12.89±0.17 d | 52.57±1.40 a | 16.45±1.73 d | 31.84±2.52 b | 25.07±1.56 c |
亚表皮层厚度 Subcortical thickness(μm) | 27.08±1.36 b | 39.38±3.16 a | 32.53±1.08 ab | 29.62±1.52 b | 39.61±3.02 a |
表皮层层数Number of epidermis layers | 2 | 3~5 | 1~3 | 3~5 | 3~5 |
亚表皮层层数 Number of subepidermal layers | 1~2 | 2~3 | 2 | 1~3 | 2~3 |
x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 | x18 | x19 | x20 | x21 | x22 | x23 | x24 | x25 | x26 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
x2 | -0.211 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
x3 | 0.610* | -0.065 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
x4 | -0.091 | 0.911** | -0.225 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.080 | 0.228 | -0.104 | 0.11 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
x6 | -0.159 | 0.725** | -0.236 | 0.884** | -0.336 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
x7 | 0.758** | 0.349 | 0.762** | 0.311 | 0.141 | 0.161 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
x8 | 0.179 | -0.662** | -0.489 | -0.454 | 0.209 | -0.463 | -0.444 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
x9 | 0.650 | 0.404 | 0.268 | 0.430 | 0.619* | 0.069 | 0.726** | -0.004 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
x10 | -0.222 | -0.588* | -0.257 | 0.774** | -0.469 | 0.970** | 0.048 | -0.427 | -0.111 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
x11 | 0.785** | -0.467 | 0.056 | -0.221 | 0.183 | -0.272 | 0.258 | 0.723** | 0.486 | -0.299 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
x12 | -0.515 | -0.499 | 0.098 | -0.695** | -0.381 | -0.468 | -0.521* | -0.102 | -0.835** | -0.324 | -0.506 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
x13 | 0.212 | -0.643** | -0.226 | -0.887** | -0.043 | 0.859** | 0.360 | -0.159 | 0.476 | 0.780** | 0.173 | -0.837** | 1 | |||||||||||||
x14 | 0.704** | 0.491 | 0.308 | 0.596* | 0.357 | 0.352 | 0.818** | -0.138 | 0.923** | 0.200 | 0.459 | -0.911** | 0.702 | 1 | ||||||||||||
x15 | -0.723** | 0.048 | -0.087 | -0.283 | 0.256 | -0.390 | -0.449 | -0.268 | -0.417 | -0.373 | -0.734** | 0.679** | -0.674 | -0.637 | 1 | |||||||||||
x16 | -0.510 | 0.573* | -0.826** | 0.730** | 0.119 | 0.683** | -0.363 | 0.051 | 0.023 | 0.641** | -0.207 | -0.433 | 0.657 | 0.098 | -0.075 | 1 | ||||||||||
x17 | 0.651** | 0.260 | 0.868** | 0.094 | 0.297 | -0.132 | 0.906** | -0.483 | 0.670** | -0.245 | 0.118 | -0.289 | 0.03 | 0.645** | -0.113 | -0.563* | 1 | |||||||||
x18 | 0.333 | -0.345 | 0.400 | -0.569* | -0.501 | -0.316 | -0.213 | -0.383 | -0.729* | -0.189 | -0.550* | 0.925** | -0.720** | -0.721** | 0.555* | -0.572* | -0.012 | 1 | ||||||||
x19 | 0.013 | 0.802** | -0.174 | 0.963** | -0.075 | 0.946** | 0.334 | -0.423 | 0.348 | 0.869** | -0.129 | -0.690* | 0.941** | 0.594** | -0.457 | 0.675** | 0.059 | -0.532* | 1 | |||||||
x20 | 0.853** | -0.056 | 0.924** | -0.116 | 0.043 | -0.196 | 0.877** | -0.269 | 0.546* | -0.261 | 0.381 | -0.237 | -0.004 | 0.586* | -0.375 | -0.727** | 0.905** | 0.049 | -0.053 | 1 | ||||||
x21 | 0.843** | 0.185 | 0.841** | 0.158 | 0.081 | 0.040 | 0.964** | -0.361 | 0.686** | -0.058 | 0.352 | -0.452 | 0.252 | 0.766** | -0.476 | -0.513 | 0.921** | -0.143 | 0.208 | 0.960** | 1 | |||||
x22 | -0.193 | -0.172 | 0.480 | -0.542* | 0.092 | -0.602* | -0.001 | -0.335 | -0.228 | -0.608* | -0.458 | 0.685** | -0.801** | -0.434 | 0.752** | -0.631* | 0.336 | 0.722** | -0.656** | 0.214 | 0.043 | 1 | ||||
x23 | 0.730** | 0.037 | -0.004 | 0.294 | 0.369 | 0.121 | 0.474 | 0.423 | 0.762** | 0.019 | 0.818** | -0.861** | 0.585* | 0.796** | -0.779** | 0.139 | 0.266 | -0.843** | 0.355 | 0.365 | 0.475 | -0.647** | 1 | |||
x24 | -0.615* | 0.036 | -0.676** | 0.001 | 0.374 | -0.124 | -0.650** | 0.304 | -0.179 | -0.100 | -0.213 | 0.136 | -0.158 | -0.391 | 0.484 | 0.471 | -0528* | -0.147 | -0.14 | 0.718** | -0.700** | -0.700** | 0.030 | -0.204 | 1 | |
x25 | 0.421 | -0.313 | -0.429 | -0.019 | 0.303 | -0.107 | -0.071 | 0.850** | 0.390 | -0.134 | 0.853** | -0.573* | 0.319 | 0.347 | -0.607* | 0.258 | -0.256 | -0.758** | 0.021 | -0.087 | -0.052 | -0.663** | 0.784** | 0.132 | 1 | |
x26 | 0.724** | -0.155 | 0.306 | -0.114 | 0.479 | -0.346 | 0.486 | 0.364 | 0.650** | -0.391 | 0.707** | -0.493 | 0.061 | 0.570* | -0.41 | -0.325 | 0.479 | -0.447 | -0.122 | 0.533** | 0.525* | -0.138 | 0.624* | -0.126 | 0.488 | 1 |
表 2 不同鲜食枣果实品质及果皮结构的相关性
Table 2 Correlation Analysis of fruit quality and pericarp structure of different fresh jujubes
x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 | x18 | x19 | x20 | x21 | x22 | x23 | x24 | x25 | x26 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
x2 | -0.211 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
x3 | 0.610* | -0.065 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
x4 | -0.091 | 0.911** | -0.225 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.080 | 0.228 | -0.104 | 0.11 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
x6 | -0.159 | 0.725** | -0.236 | 0.884** | -0.336 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
x7 | 0.758** | 0.349 | 0.762** | 0.311 | 0.141 | 0.161 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
x8 | 0.179 | -0.662** | -0.489 | -0.454 | 0.209 | -0.463 | -0.444 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
x9 | 0.650 | 0.404 | 0.268 | 0.430 | 0.619* | 0.069 | 0.726** | -0.004 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
x10 | -0.222 | -0.588* | -0.257 | 0.774** | -0.469 | 0.970** | 0.048 | -0.427 | -0.111 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
x11 | 0.785** | -0.467 | 0.056 | -0.221 | 0.183 | -0.272 | 0.258 | 0.723** | 0.486 | -0.299 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
x12 | -0.515 | -0.499 | 0.098 | -0.695** | -0.381 | -0.468 | -0.521* | -0.102 | -0.835** | -0.324 | -0.506 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
x13 | 0.212 | -0.643** | -0.226 | -0.887** | -0.043 | 0.859** | 0.360 | -0.159 | 0.476 | 0.780** | 0.173 | -0.837** | 1 | |||||||||||||
x14 | 0.704** | 0.491 | 0.308 | 0.596* | 0.357 | 0.352 | 0.818** | -0.138 | 0.923** | 0.200 | 0.459 | -0.911** | 0.702 | 1 | ||||||||||||
x15 | -0.723** | 0.048 | -0.087 | -0.283 | 0.256 | -0.390 | -0.449 | -0.268 | -0.417 | -0.373 | -0.734** | 0.679** | -0.674 | -0.637 | 1 | |||||||||||
x16 | -0.510 | 0.573* | -0.826** | 0.730** | 0.119 | 0.683** | -0.363 | 0.051 | 0.023 | 0.641** | -0.207 | -0.433 | 0.657 | 0.098 | -0.075 | 1 | ||||||||||
x17 | 0.651** | 0.260 | 0.868** | 0.094 | 0.297 | -0.132 | 0.906** | -0.483 | 0.670** | -0.245 | 0.118 | -0.289 | 0.03 | 0.645** | -0.113 | -0.563* | 1 | |||||||||
x18 | 0.333 | -0.345 | 0.400 | -0.569* | -0.501 | -0.316 | -0.213 | -0.383 | -0.729* | -0.189 | -0.550* | 0.925** | -0.720** | -0.721** | 0.555* | -0.572* | -0.012 | 1 | ||||||||
x19 | 0.013 | 0.802** | -0.174 | 0.963** | -0.075 | 0.946** | 0.334 | -0.423 | 0.348 | 0.869** | -0.129 | -0.690* | 0.941** | 0.594** | -0.457 | 0.675** | 0.059 | -0.532* | 1 | |||||||
x20 | 0.853** | -0.056 | 0.924** | -0.116 | 0.043 | -0.196 | 0.877** | -0.269 | 0.546* | -0.261 | 0.381 | -0.237 | -0.004 | 0.586* | -0.375 | -0.727** | 0.905** | 0.049 | -0.053 | 1 | ||||||
x21 | 0.843** | 0.185 | 0.841** | 0.158 | 0.081 | 0.040 | 0.964** | -0.361 | 0.686** | -0.058 | 0.352 | -0.452 | 0.252 | 0.766** | -0.476 | -0.513 | 0.921** | -0.143 | 0.208 | 0.960** | 1 | |||||
x22 | -0.193 | -0.172 | 0.480 | -0.542* | 0.092 | -0.602* | -0.001 | -0.335 | -0.228 | -0.608* | -0.458 | 0.685** | -0.801** | -0.434 | 0.752** | -0.631* | 0.336 | 0.722** | -0.656** | 0.214 | 0.043 | 1 | ||||
x23 | 0.730** | 0.037 | -0.004 | 0.294 | 0.369 | 0.121 | 0.474 | 0.423 | 0.762** | 0.019 | 0.818** | -0.861** | 0.585* | 0.796** | -0.779** | 0.139 | 0.266 | -0.843** | 0.355 | 0.365 | 0.475 | -0.647** | 1 | |||
x24 | -0.615* | 0.036 | -0.676** | 0.001 | 0.374 | -0.124 | -0.650** | 0.304 | -0.179 | -0.100 | -0.213 | 0.136 | -0.158 | -0.391 | 0.484 | 0.471 | -0528* | -0.147 | -0.14 | 0.718** | -0.700** | -0.700** | 0.030 | -0.204 | 1 | |
x25 | 0.421 | -0.313 | -0.429 | -0.019 | 0.303 | -0.107 | -0.071 | 0.850** | 0.390 | -0.134 | 0.853** | -0.573* | 0.319 | 0.347 | -0.607* | 0.258 | -0.256 | -0.758** | 0.021 | -0.087 | -0.052 | -0.663** | 0.784** | 0.132 | 1 | |
x26 | 0.724** | -0.155 | 0.306 | -0.114 | 0.479 | -0.346 | 0.486 | 0.364 | 0.650** | -0.391 | 0.707** | -0.493 | 0.061 | 0.570* | -0.41 | -0.325 | 0.479 | -0.447 | -0.122 | 0.533** | 0.525* | -0.138 | 0.624* | -0.126 | 0.488 | 1 |
果实性状 Fruit characters | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
可溶性蛋白Soluble protein | 0.732 | 0.616 | -0.143 | -0.241 |
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 0.409 | -0.522 | 0.592 | 0.434 |
葡萄糖Glucose | 0.226 | 0.802 | 0.533 | -0.105 |
果糖Fructose | 0.589 | -0.681 | 0.390 | 0.188 |
蔗糖Sucrose | 0.251 | 0.116 | -0.314 | 0.873 |
淀粉Starch | 0.414 | -0.747 | 0.451 | -0.242 |
总酸Total acid | 0.754 | 0.454 | 0.440 | 0.042 |
类黄酮Flavonoid | -0.028 | 0.047 | -0.989 | -0.113 |
可溶性果胶Soluble pectin | 0.855 | 0.200 | -0.059 | 0.443 |
原果胶Protopectin | 0.286 | -0.751 | 0.424 | -0.375 |
纤维Cellulose | 0.562 | 0.343 | -0.701 | -0.248 |
半纤维Hemicellulose | -0.937 | 0.254 | 0.155 | -0.159 |
果胶酶Pectinase | 0.773 | -0.602 | 0.126 | -0.137 |
纤维素酶Cellulase | 0.976 | 0.071 | 0.098 | 0.163 |
多酚氧化酶Polyphenol oxidase | -0.776 | 0.035 | 0.229 | 0.579 |
苹果酸Malic acid | 0.151 | -0.963 | -0.119 | 0.173 |
柠檬酸Citric acid | 0.520 | 0.655 | 0.469 | 0.274 |
Vc含量 Vc content | -0.761 | 0.368 | 0.454 | -0.256 |
纵径Longitudinal diameter | 0.632 | -0.664 | 0.383 | -0.056 |
横径Transverse diameter | 0.532 | 0.778 | 0.305 | -0.103 |
单果重Single fruit weight | 0.712 | 0.586 | 0.377 | -0.048 |
可溶性固形物Soluble solids | -0.587 | 0.589 | 0.354 | 0.356 |
蜡质层厚度Thickness of wax layer | 0.864 | 0.045 | -0.452 | -0.018 |
角质层厚度Cuticle thickness | -0.406 | -0.439 | -0.396 | 0.525 |
表皮层厚度Epidermis thickness | 0.460 | -0.098 | -0.865 | -0.092 |
亚表皮层厚度Subcortical thickness | 0.566 | 0.495 | -0.390 | 0.201 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 9.911 | 7.370 | 5.268 | 2.569 |
贡献率(%)Contribution rate | 38.119 | 28.346 | 20.260 | 9.881 |
累积贡献率 (%)Cumulative contribution rate | 38.119 | 66.465 | 86.725 | 96.606 |
表 3 4个主成分的特征向量、特征值、贡献率及累积贡献率
Table 3 The eigenvectors, eigenvalues, contribution rates and cumulative contribution rates of 4 PCAs
果实性状 Fruit characters | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
可溶性蛋白Soluble protein | 0.732 | 0.616 | -0.143 | -0.241 |
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 0.409 | -0.522 | 0.592 | 0.434 |
葡萄糖Glucose | 0.226 | 0.802 | 0.533 | -0.105 |
果糖Fructose | 0.589 | -0.681 | 0.390 | 0.188 |
蔗糖Sucrose | 0.251 | 0.116 | -0.314 | 0.873 |
淀粉Starch | 0.414 | -0.747 | 0.451 | -0.242 |
总酸Total acid | 0.754 | 0.454 | 0.440 | 0.042 |
类黄酮Flavonoid | -0.028 | 0.047 | -0.989 | -0.113 |
可溶性果胶Soluble pectin | 0.855 | 0.200 | -0.059 | 0.443 |
原果胶Protopectin | 0.286 | -0.751 | 0.424 | -0.375 |
纤维Cellulose | 0.562 | 0.343 | -0.701 | -0.248 |
半纤维Hemicellulose | -0.937 | 0.254 | 0.155 | -0.159 |
果胶酶Pectinase | 0.773 | -0.602 | 0.126 | -0.137 |
纤维素酶Cellulase | 0.976 | 0.071 | 0.098 | 0.163 |
多酚氧化酶Polyphenol oxidase | -0.776 | 0.035 | 0.229 | 0.579 |
苹果酸Malic acid | 0.151 | -0.963 | -0.119 | 0.173 |
柠檬酸Citric acid | 0.520 | 0.655 | 0.469 | 0.274 |
Vc含量 Vc content | -0.761 | 0.368 | 0.454 | -0.256 |
纵径Longitudinal diameter | 0.632 | -0.664 | 0.383 | -0.056 |
横径Transverse diameter | 0.532 | 0.778 | 0.305 | -0.103 |
单果重Single fruit weight | 0.712 | 0.586 | 0.377 | -0.048 |
可溶性固形物Soluble solids | -0.587 | 0.589 | 0.354 | 0.356 |
蜡质层厚度Thickness of wax layer | 0.864 | 0.045 | -0.452 | -0.018 |
角质层厚度Cuticle thickness | -0.406 | -0.439 | -0.396 | 0.525 |
表皮层厚度Epidermis thickness | 0.460 | -0.098 | -0.865 | -0.092 |
亚表皮层厚度Subcortical thickness | 0.566 | 0.495 | -0.390 | 0.201 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 9.911 | 7.370 | 5.268 | 2.569 |
贡献率(%)Contribution rate | 38.119 | 28.346 | 20.260 | 9.881 |
累积贡献率 (%)Cumulative contribution rate | 38.119 | 66.465 | 86.725 | 96.606 |
品种 Cultivars | 主成分得分Principal component score | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |||
蟠枣Panzao | 4.458 | 2.722 | 1.930 | 0.099 | 3.012 | 1 |
冬枣Dongzao | 0.612 | 0.997 | -4.225 | -0.621 | -0.501 | 2 |
乳脆蜜Rucuimi | 1.701 | -4.990 | 0.379 | 0.258 | -0.677 | 3 |
伏脆蜜Fucuimi | -3.307 | 0.953 | 0.296 | 2.502 | -0.704 | 4 |
赛蜜酥Saimisu | -3.465 | 0.319 | 1.620 | -2.238 | -1.131 | 5 |
表 4 不同品种果实品质性状的主成分得分及综合评价
Table 4 Principal component scores and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality traits of different varieties
品种 Cultivars | 主成分得分Principal component score | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |||
蟠枣Panzao | 4.458 | 2.722 | 1.930 | 0.099 | 3.012 | 1 |
冬枣Dongzao | 0.612 | 0.997 | -4.225 | -0.621 | -0.501 | 2 |
乳脆蜜Rucuimi | 1.701 | -4.990 | 0.379 | 0.258 | -0.677 | 3 |
伏脆蜜Fucuimi | -3.307 | 0.953 | 0.296 | 2.502 | -0.704 | 4 |
赛蜜酥Saimisu | -3.465 | 0.319 | 1.620 | -2.238 | -1.131 | 5 |
[1] | 曲泽洲, 王永蕙. 中国果树志:枣卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1993. |
QU Zezhou, Wang Yonghui. Chorography of Chinese fruit trees:jujube volume [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1993. | |
[2] | 刘平, 刘孟军, 刘嘉彬, 等. 鲜食枣新品种‘雨娇’[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(9):1839-1840. |
LIU Ping, LIU Mengjun, LIU Jiabin, et al. A new fresh jujube variety 'Yujiao'[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43 (9):1839-1840. | |
[3] | 姜闯. 南疆红枣产业发展中存在的问题及对策[J]. 山西果树, 2012,(2):43-45. |
JIANG Chuang. Problems and Countermeasures in the development of Ziziphus Jujuba industry in southern Xinjiang[J]. Shanxi Fruit Tree, 2012,(2):43-45. | |
[4] | 金新文, 姚雪东, 刘成江, 等. 新疆南疆地区红枣产业发展现状及对策[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(10):434-437. |
JIN Xinwen, YAO Xuedong, LIU Chengjiang, et al. Development status and Countermeasures of jujube industry in southern Xinjiang[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42 (10):434-437. | |
[5] | 闫忠业, 伊凯, 刘志, 等. 富士苹果果实主要营养元素含量变化与品质的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(6):167-169. |
YAN Zhongye, YI Kai, LIU Zhi, et al. Relationship between changes of main nutrient elements and fruit quality of Fuji Apple[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46 (6):167-169. | |
[6] | 张淑文, 梁森苗, 郑锡良, 等. 杨梅优株果实品质的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(8):977-986. |
ZHANG Shuwen, LIANG Senmiao, ZHENG Xiliang, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of Myrica rubra[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35 (8):977-986. | |
[7] | 林蝉蝉, 何舟阳, 单文龙, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析综合评价杨凌地区红色鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(4):520-532. |
LIN Chanchan, HE Zhouyang, SHAN Wenlong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of red fresh grape in Yangling area based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37 (4):520-532. | |
[8] | 刘丙花, 孙锐, 王开芳, 等. 不同蓝莓品种果实品质比较与综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(1):70-76. |
LIU Binghua, SUN Rui, WANG Kaifang, et al. Comparison and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of different blueberry varieties[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40 (1):70-76.
DOI URL |
|
[9] | 牟红梅, 于强, 李庆余, 等. 基于主成分分析的烟台地区西洋梨果实品质综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(8):1084-1092. |
MOU Hongmei, YU Qiang, LI Qingyu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of western pear fruit quality in Yantai area based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36 (8):1084-1092. | |
[10] | 蒋卉, 丁慧萍, 白红进. 新疆南疆引进鲜食枣品种品质性状的综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(3):55-59. |
JIANG Hui, DING Huiping, BAI Hongjin. Comprehensive evaluation on quality traits of introduced fresh jujube varieties in southern Xinjiang[J]. Food science, 2016, 37 (3):55-59. | |
[11] | 苏娟娟. 陕北鲜食枣果实品质性状研究[D]. 杨陵: 西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
SU Juanjuan. Study on fruit quality of fresh jujube in Northern Shaanxi[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019. | |
[12] | 张萍, 史彦江, 宋锋惠, 等. 南疆灰枣主要营养品质性状的变异及相关性研究[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 28(1):77-81. |
ZHANG Ping, SHI Yanjiang, SONG Fenghui, et al. Study on variation and correlation of main nutritional quality traits of jujube in southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2011, 28 (1):77-81. | |
[13] | 樊保国, 李月梅, 李登科. 鲜食枣品质性状的综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(2):79-82,87. |
FAN Baoguo, LI Yuemei, LI Dengke. Comprehensive evaluation of quality characters of fresh jujube[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27 (2):79-82,87. | |
[14] |
阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 樊丁宇, 岳婉婉, 等. 新疆枣花芽分化和单花发育过程观察与分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5):798-805.
DOI |
ABUDOUKAYOUMU Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, YUE Wanwan, et al. Observation and analysis of flower bud differentiation and single flower development of Ziziphus jujuba in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57 (5):798-805. | |
[15] | 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. |
Gao Junfeng. Experimental guidance of plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. | |
[16] | 陈刚, 李胜. 植物生理学实验[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016. |
CHEN Gang, LI Sheng. Experiment of plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2016. | |
[17] | 彭勇菲, 李学营, 彭建营. 19个早中熟鲜食枣品种果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2019, 42(6):51-56,64. |
PENG Yongfei, LI Xueying, PENG Jianying. Fruit quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 19 early and middle maturing fresh jujube varieties[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2019, 42 (6):51-56,64. | |
[18] | 王永康. 枣种质资源鉴定评价技术规范及遗传多样性研究[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2014. |
WANG Yongkang. Technical specification for identification and evaluation of Jujube Germplasm Resources and Study on genetic diversity[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[19] | 陈文涛, 袁德义, 张日清, 等. 鲜食枣品质的综合评价[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 40(1):32-36. |
CHEN Wentao, YUAN Deyi, ZHANG Riqing, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fresh jujube quality[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 40(1):32-36. | |
[20] | 郭红彦, 白晋华, 段风琴, 等. 钙处理对壶瓶枣裂果细胞壁降解酶活性及组织结构的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(8):1486-1494. |
GUO Hongyan, BAI Jinhua, DUAN Fengqin, et al. Effect of calcium treatment on cell wall degrading enzyme activity and tissue structure of Hupingzao fruit cracking[J]. Acta horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46 (8):1486-1494. | |
[21] |
段卞慧, 冯一峰, 林敏娟, 等. 引进16个鲜食枣品种品质性状的主成分分析和综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(12):2198-2210.
DOI |
DUAN Bianhui, FENG Yifeng, LIN Minjuan, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of 16 introduced fresh jujube varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54 (12):2198-2210.
DOI |
|
[22] | 吴硕, 贾彦丽, 智福军, 等. 31份枣资源19个性状的多元统计分析[J]. 河北农业科学, 2020, 24(5):56-62,70. |
WU Shuo, JIA Yanli, ZHI Fujun, et al. Multivariate statistical analysis of 19 characters of 31 jujube resources[J]. Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 24 (5):56-62,70. | |
[23] | 刘隋赟昊, 韩超, 于婷, 等. 21个鲜食枣品种的引种试验研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(6):1023-1033. |
LIU Suiyunhao, HAN Chao, YU Ting, et al. Experimental study on the introduction of 21 fresh jujube varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53 (6):1023-1033. | |
[24] | 冯耀飞, 张慧艳, 王加强, 等. 交城骏枣优树选择[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,(4):402-404. |
FENG Yaofei, ZHANG Huiyan, WANG Jiaqiang, et al. Selection of excellent jujube trees in Jiaocheng[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2005,(4):402-404. | |
[25] | 冯一峰. 新疆引进优良鲜食枣品种的评价与筛选[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2015. |
FENG Yifeng. Evaluation and selection of introduced fresh jujube varieties in Xinjiang[D]. Alaer: Tarim University, 2015. |
[1] | 靳娟, 李丽莉, 杨磊, 樊丁宇, 郝庆. 新疆红枣产业发展现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[2] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[3] | 张福林, 李宁, 刘宇翔, 陈怡佳, 余庆辉, 闫会转. 外源2,4-表油菜素内酯及褪黑素对樱桃番茄果实品质和果皮形态结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1738-1747. |
[4] | 户金鸽, 白世践, 陈光, 蔡军社. 不同地面覆盖方式对酿酒葡萄品种马瑟兰果实品质的影响及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1131-1139. |
[5] | 高沐甜, 肖艳梅, 廖志杰, 黄成. 玉米-大刍草渗入系群体籽粒及品质性状的综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 885-891. |
[6] | 王季姣, 潘越, 王世伟, 韩政伟, 马勇, 虎海防, 王宝庆. 土壤养分与北冰红山葡萄果实品质间的典型相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 355-364. |
[7] | 户金鸽, 白世践, 郑明. 无核白及芽变长粒无核白葡萄的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2954-2965. |
[8] | 徐斌, 王征, 宋占腾, 玛尔哈巴·帕尔哈提, 朱靖蓉, 车凤斌, 李永海, 武凤艳, 苗福红. 11份野生沙棘种质资源果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031. |
[9] | 唐丽, 田可川, 张昕宁, 刘黎, 阿布力克木·阿地力, 杨智, 杨存明, 张晓雪, 黄锡霞, 田月珍. 不同生长阶段和田羊体重体尺指标的聚类与主成分分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2853-2860. |
[10] | 张金荣, 卢士玲, 罗瑞峰, 马小宁, 王国栋. 叶面喷施硒肥对3种葡萄果实硒含量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2417-2426. |
[11] | 李新豫, 开乃斯·哈比江, 李长城, 赵蕾, 张志刚, 赵世荣. 不同成熟度杏果实常温贮藏条件下品质变化规律分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2444-2457. |
[12] | 胡志伟, 杨娜, 汤智辉, 支金虎, 迟春明. 水肥耦合对主干型苹果树果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2458-2464. |
[13] | 白世践, 户金鸽, 李帅, 薛锋, 张雯, 潘绪兵, 魏登攀, 赵荣华, 蔡军社. 2种栽培模式对酿酒葡萄马瑟兰果际微域环境和果实发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 79-91. |
[14] | 欧阳单华, 赵康, 宋东博, 柳自清, 郭旺珍, 刘燕, 顾爱星, 阿扎提古丽·麦麦提图尔, 艾力卡尔江·艾麦尔. 35份棉花品系对黄萎病抗性鉴定及综合分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 9-18. |
[15] | 刘玉芳, 张志刚, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同温度和成熟度对杏贮藏期腐烂率和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 96
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 1170
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||