Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (9): 2331-2340.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.030
• Prataculture·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian·Food Process Engineering • Previous Articles
Bayinhua 1(), LIANG Long2, HE Pengfei1, LI Jiaying1, HE Xin1, HE Sangang2, LI Wenrong2()
Received:
2022-11-20
Online:
2023-09-20
Published:
2023-09-19
Correspondence author:
LI Wenrong (1969 -), female, From Haian Jiangsu, Province, researcher, research direction: Animal Genetics and breeding, (E-mail) Supported by:
巴音花1(), 梁龙2, 何鹏飞1, 李佳莹1, 贺鑫1, 贺三刚2, 李文蓉2()
通讯作者:
李文蓉 (1969-),女,江苏海安人,研究员,研究方向为动物遗传育种,(E-mail)作者简介:
巴音花(1997-),女,新疆温泉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物遗传育种,(E-mail)2648972853@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Bayinhua , LIANG Long, HE Pengfei, LI Jiaying, HE Xin, HE Sangang, LI Wenrong. Comparison of early growth performance of offspring of kazakh sheep with different hybrid combinations[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2331-2340.
巴音花, 梁龙, 何鹏飞, 李佳莹, 贺鑫, 贺三刚, 李文蓉. 哈萨克羊与特克赛尔羊不同杂交组合后代羔羊早期生长性能的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2331-2340.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.030
杂交类型 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | 公羔数量 (只) Number of male lambs | 称重记录 (只·次) Weighing record | 母羔数量 (只) Number of female lambs | 称重记录 (只·次) Weighing record |
---|---|---|---|---|
特克赛尔羊×F1 Texel sheep×F1 | 344 | 2 897 | 342 | 3 078 |
F2×F1 | 84 | 739 | 102 | 964 |
F2×哈萨克羊 F2×Kazakh sheep | 78 | 689 | 117 | 1 148 |
F1×F2 | 55 | 441 | 71 | 705 |
Tab.1 Summary of different hybrid combinations
杂交类型 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | 公羔数量 (只) Number of male lambs | 称重记录 (只·次) Weighing record | 母羔数量 (只) Number of female lambs | 称重记录 (只·次) Weighing record |
---|---|---|---|---|
特克赛尔羊×F1 Texel sheep×F1 | 344 | 2 897 | 342 | 3 078 |
F2×F1 | 84 | 739 | 102 | 964 |
F2×哈萨克羊 F2×Kazakh sheep | 78 | 689 | 117 | 1 148 |
F1×F2 | 55 | 441 | 71 | 705 |
模型 Model | 表达通式 Expression | 拐点月龄 Inflection point months | 拐点体重 Inflection point weight |
---|---|---|---|
Logistic | WT=A(1+Be-kt) | InB/K | A/2 |
Gompertz | WT=A | InB/K | A/e |
Von Bertalanffy | WT=A(1-Be-kt)3 | In3B/K | 8A/27 |
Tab.2 Growth curve model and its characteristic parameters
模型 Model | 表达通式 Expression | 拐点月龄 Inflection point months | 拐点体重 Inflection point weight |
---|---|---|---|
Logistic | WT=A(1+Be-kt) | InB/K | A/2 |
Gompertz | WT=A | InB/K | A/e |
Von Bertalanffy | WT=A(1-Be-kt)3 | In3B/K | 8A/27 |
性别 Sex | 日龄 Day age | 杂交组合Hybrid type(♂×♀) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特克赛尔羊×F1 Texel sheep×F1 | F2×F1 | F2×哈萨克羊 F2×Kazakh sheep | F1×F2 | ||
公羔 Lamb | 出生重 | 5.42±0.88A | 5.48±0.85A | 5.52±0.75A | 4.73±0.86B |
30日龄 | 12.91±2.18A | 13.00±2.23A | 13.12±2.66A | 10.39±1.54B | |
60日龄 | 21.55±3.88A | 21.56±3.33A | 20.47±4.28Aa | 16.76±3.36Bb | |
90日龄 | 29.89±4.99Aa | 29.17±3.35Aa | 29.81±3.09Bab | 24.53±3.12Bb | |
120日龄 | 36.99±5.92a | 38.68±4.99a | 33.94±5.02a | 31.80±5.23b | |
150日龄 | 38.14±4.79 | 40.67±3.23 | 36.07±5.77 | 34.15±1.61 | |
180日龄 | 42.19±3.87 | 43.55±3.67 | 39.94±5.47 | 37.41±4.62 | |
母羔 Female lamb | 出生重 | 5.20±0.83A | 5.22±0.77A | 5.30±0.61A | 4.66±0.79B |
30日龄 | 12.62±2.23A | 13.09±1.41A | 13.12±1.59A | 10.01±2.41B | |
60日龄 | 20.64±3.21A | 20.31±3.20A | 19.98±2.37A | 15.44±3.55B | |
90日龄 | 28.95±3.71Aa | 27.90±3.56Aab | 26.73±3.99Ab | 23.12±3.25B | |
120日龄 | 33.65±5.14A | 36.18±4.84ABa | 31.73±3.96ABab | 29.76±3.35Bb | |
150日龄 | 34.96±5.34 | 39.59±1.54 | 33.86±6.22 | 32.42±5.36 | |
180日龄 | 39.33±5.02A | 41.11±3.95A | 37.02±5.36A | 34.71±6.68B |
Tab.3 Comparison of cumulative growth of lambs in different stages of different hybrid combinations
性别 Sex | 日龄 Day age | 杂交组合Hybrid type(♂×♀) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特克赛尔羊×F1 Texel sheep×F1 | F2×F1 | F2×哈萨克羊 F2×Kazakh sheep | F1×F2 | ||
公羔 Lamb | 出生重 | 5.42±0.88A | 5.48±0.85A | 5.52±0.75A | 4.73±0.86B |
30日龄 | 12.91±2.18A | 13.00±2.23A | 13.12±2.66A | 10.39±1.54B | |
60日龄 | 21.55±3.88A | 21.56±3.33A | 20.47±4.28Aa | 16.76±3.36Bb | |
90日龄 | 29.89±4.99Aa | 29.17±3.35Aa | 29.81±3.09Bab | 24.53±3.12Bb | |
120日龄 | 36.99±5.92a | 38.68±4.99a | 33.94±5.02a | 31.80±5.23b | |
150日龄 | 38.14±4.79 | 40.67±3.23 | 36.07±5.77 | 34.15±1.61 | |
180日龄 | 42.19±3.87 | 43.55±3.67 | 39.94±5.47 | 37.41±4.62 | |
母羔 Female lamb | 出生重 | 5.20±0.83A | 5.22±0.77A | 5.30±0.61A | 4.66±0.79B |
30日龄 | 12.62±2.23A | 13.09±1.41A | 13.12±1.59A | 10.01±2.41B | |
60日龄 | 20.64±3.21A | 20.31±3.20A | 19.98±2.37A | 15.44±3.55B | |
90日龄 | 28.95±3.71Aa | 27.90±3.56Aab | 26.73±3.99Ab | 23.12±3.25B | |
120日龄 | 33.65±5.14A | 36.18±4.84ABa | 31.73±3.96ABab | 29.76±3.35Bb | |
150日龄 | 34.96±5.34 | 39.59±1.54 | 33.86±6.22 | 32.42±5.36 | |
180日龄 | 39.33±5.02A | 41.11±3.95A | 37.02±5.36A | 34.71±6.68B |
性别 Sex | 杂交组合 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | 不同生长阶段日增重 Daily weight gain at different growth stages (g/d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~30 d | 30~60 d | 60~90 d | 90~120 d | 120~150 d | 150~180 d | ||
公羔 Lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 236.06±65.90Aa | 255.28±95.90a | 255.28±95.90 | 257.92±90.61a | 94.5±25.04 | 84.96±64.40 |
F2×F1 | 257.83±60.79Aa | 297.58±66.62Aa | 297.58±66.62 | 205.26±150.37 | 65.6±1.82 | 136.01±3.70 | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 220.43±82.72 | 226.42±76.43b | 226.42±76.43a | 221.05±53.62 | 70.5±17.16 | 167.22±64.20 | |
F1×F2 | 184.06±41.01B | 201.01±78.12Bb | 201.01±78.12b | 208.67±51.05b | 67.6±2.61 | 113.4±24.22 | |
母羔 Female lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 243.39±64.31Aa | 256.62±76.18A | 274.88±70.02A | 215.71±62.53a | 81.67±22.59 | 147.05±64.88a |
F2×F1 | 255.9±44.24A | 262.55±53.25A | 253.79±40.74 | 213.61±31.09 | 67.27±21.68 | 59.8±14.15ab | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 218.04±52.25Ab | 241.17±75.56A | 262.41±64.18Aa | 180.29±55.83 | 76.67±36.52 | 101.13±12.11bc | |
F1×F2 | 175.29±45.29 | 174.30±69.81B | 219.52±46.92Bb | 180.67±45.02b | 69.93±14.64 | 105.47±20.01c |
Tab.4 Comparison of daily gain of lambs of different hybrid combinations at different stages
性别 Sex | 杂交组合 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | 不同生长阶段日增重 Daily weight gain at different growth stages (g/d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~30 d | 30~60 d | 60~90 d | 90~120 d | 120~150 d | 150~180 d | ||
公羔 Lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 236.06±65.90Aa | 255.28±95.90a | 255.28±95.90 | 257.92±90.61a | 94.5±25.04 | 84.96±64.40 |
F2×F1 | 257.83±60.79Aa | 297.58±66.62Aa | 297.58±66.62 | 205.26±150.37 | 65.6±1.82 | 136.01±3.70 | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 220.43±82.72 | 226.42±76.43b | 226.42±76.43a | 221.05±53.62 | 70.5±17.16 | 167.22±64.20 | |
F1×F2 | 184.06±41.01B | 201.01±78.12Bb | 201.01±78.12b | 208.67±51.05b | 67.6±2.61 | 113.4±24.22 | |
母羔 Female lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 243.39±64.31Aa | 256.62±76.18A | 274.88±70.02A | 215.71±62.53a | 81.67±22.59 | 147.05±64.88a |
F2×F1 | 255.9±44.24A | 262.55±53.25A | 253.79±40.74 | 213.61±31.09 | 67.27±21.68 | 59.8±14.15ab | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 218.04±52.25Ab | 241.17±75.56A | 262.41±64.18Aa | 180.29±55.83 | 76.67±36.52 | 101.13±12.11bc | |
F1×F2 | 175.29±45.29 | 174.30±69.81B | 219.52±46.92Bb | 180.67±45.02b | 69.93±14.64 | 105.47±20.01c |
杂交组合 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | 性别 Sex | 模型名称 Model | 模型参数 Model parameter | 模型拟合度 Model fit | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | K | R2 | |||
特克赛尔羊×F1 Texel sheep×F1 | 公羔 | Logistic | 42.79 | 5.499 | 0.028 | 0.997 |
Gompertz | 46.37 | 2.135 | 0.017 | 0.998 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 48.91 | 0.531 | 0.014 | 0.997 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 42.49 | 0.524 | 0.016 | 0.994 | |
Gompertz | 40.81 | 2.098 | 0.019 | 0.996 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 42.49 | 0.524 | 0.016 | 0.994 | ||
F2×F1 | 公羔 | Logistic | 43.27 | 5.176 | 0.028 | 0.995 |
Gompertz | 46.63 | 2.074 | 0.017 | 0.997 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 48.99 | 0.521 | 0.014 | 0.996 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 39.49 | 5.176 | 0.029 | 0.996 | |
Gompertz | 42.20 | 2.063 | 0.018 | 0.995 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 44.04 | 0.518 | 0.015 | 0.994 | ||
F2×哈萨克羊 F2×Kazakh sheep | 公羔 | Logistic | 40.88 | 5.197 | 0.027 | 0.995 |
Gompertz | 44.61 | 2.07 | 0.016 | 0.996 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 47.27 | 0.52 | 0.013 | 0.995 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 37.58 | 4.843 | 0.028 | 0.977 | |
Gompertz | 40.47 | 1.99 | 0.017 | 0.997 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 42.43 | 0.504 | 0.014 | 0.997 | ||
F2×F1 | 公羔 | Logistic | 42.657 | 6.023 | 0.022 | 0.994 |
Gompertz | 50.198 | 2.256 | 0.012 | 0.996 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 56.676 | 0.557 | 0.009 | 0.996 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 33.364 | 4.965 | 0.026 | 0.992 | |
Gompertz | 36.529 | 2.021 | 0.016 | 0.993 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 38.772 | 0.511 | 0.012 | 0.993 |
Tab.5 Relevant estimates of indicators of Logistic, Gompertz and Von Bertalanffy models
杂交组合 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | 性别 Sex | 模型名称 Model | 模型参数 Model parameter | 模型拟合度 Model fit | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | K | R2 | |||
特克赛尔羊×F1 Texel sheep×F1 | 公羔 | Logistic | 42.79 | 5.499 | 0.028 | 0.997 |
Gompertz | 46.37 | 2.135 | 0.017 | 0.998 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 48.91 | 0.531 | 0.014 | 0.997 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 42.49 | 0.524 | 0.016 | 0.994 | |
Gompertz | 40.81 | 2.098 | 0.019 | 0.996 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 42.49 | 0.524 | 0.016 | 0.994 | ||
F2×F1 | 公羔 | Logistic | 43.27 | 5.176 | 0.028 | 0.995 |
Gompertz | 46.63 | 2.074 | 0.017 | 0.997 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 48.99 | 0.521 | 0.014 | 0.996 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 39.49 | 5.176 | 0.029 | 0.996 | |
Gompertz | 42.20 | 2.063 | 0.018 | 0.995 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 44.04 | 0.518 | 0.015 | 0.994 | ||
F2×哈萨克羊 F2×Kazakh sheep | 公羔 | Logistic | 40.88 | 5.197 | 0.027 | 0.995 |
Gompertz | 44.61 | 2.07 | 0.016 | 0.996 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 47.27 | 0.52 | 0.013 | 0.995 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 37.58 | 4.843 | 0.028 | 0.977 | |
Gompertz | 40.47 | 1.99 | 0.017 | 0.997 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 42.43 | 0.504 | 0.014 | 0.997 | ||
F2×F1 | 公羔 | Logistic | 42.657 | 6.023 | 0.022 | 0.994 |
Gompertz | 50.198 | 2.256 | 0.012 | 0.996 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 56.676 | 0.557 | 0.009 | 0.996 | ||
母羔 | Logistic | 33.364 | 4.965 | 0.026 | 0.992 | |
Gompertz | 36.529 | 2.021 | 0.016 | 0.993 | ||
Von Bertalanffy | 38.772 | 0.511 | 0.012 | 0.993 |
性别 Sex | 杂交组合 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | Gompertz模型参数 Model parameter | 拐点日龄 Inflection point months | 拐点体重 Inflection point weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | K | ||||
公羔 Lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 46.37 | 2.14 | 0.017 | 44.62 | 17.06 |
F2×F1 | 46.64 | 2.07 | 0.017 | 42.91 | 17.16 | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 44.62 | 2.07 | 0.016 | 45.47 | 16.41 | |
F1×F2 | 50.20 | 2.26 | 0.012 | 67.80 | 18.47 | |
母羔 Female lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 40.82 | 2.10 | 0.019 | 39.00 | 15.02 |
F2×F1 | 42.21 | 2.06 | 0.018 | 40.23 | 15.53 | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 40.47 | 1.99 | 0.017 | 40.48 | 14.89 | |
F1×F2 | 36.53 | 2.02 | 0.016 | 42.97 | 13.44 |
Tab.6 Relevant parameters of Gompertz model fitting in different hybrid groups
性别 Sex | 杂交组合 Hybrid type (♂×♀) | Gompertz模型参数 Model parameter | 拐点日龄 Inflection point months | 拐点体重 Inflection point weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | K | ||||
公羔 Lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 46.37 | 2.14 | 0.017 | 44.62 | 17.06 |
F2×F1 | 46.64 | 2.07 | 0.017 | 42.91 | 17.16 | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 44.62 | 2.07 | 0.016 | 45.47 | 16.41 | |
F1×F2 | 50.20 | 2.26 | 0.012 | 67.80 | 18.47 | |
母羔 Female lamb | 特克赛尔羊×F1 | 40.82 | 2.10 | 0.019 | 39.00 | 15.02 |
F2×F1 | 42.21 | 2.06 | 0.018 | 40.23 | 15.53 | |
F2×哈萨克羊 | 40.47 | 1.99 | 0.017 | 40.48 | 14.89 | |
F1×F2 | 36.53 | 2.02 | 0.016 | 42.97 | 13.44 |
[1] | 张树强, 李庆梅. 绵羊地方品种改良中的问题与措施[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2021, 17(8): 90-91. |
ZHANG Shuqiang, LI Qingmei. Problems and measures in the improvement of local sheep breeds[J]. China Livestock and Poultry Seed Industry 2021, 17(8): 90-91. | |
[2] | 王爱芳, 贾旭升. 对哈萨克羊良繁体系建设的探讨[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2012, 8(11):56-58. |
WANG Aifang, JIA Xusheng. Discussion on the construction of Kazakh sheep fine and traditional system[J]. China Livestock and Poultry Seed Industry, 2012, 8 (11): 56-58. | |
[3] | 吐来力江·哈木太, 吐尔逊江·吾木尔艾力, 艾比拜木, 等. 哈萨克羊不同杂交后代屠宰性能比较分析[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2021, 41(5): 64-66. |
Tulailijiang Hamutai, Tuersunjiang Wumueraili, Abibaimu, et al. Comparative analysis of slaughter performance of different hybrid offspring of Kazak sheep[J]. Chinese Herbivore Science, 2021, 41(5): 64-66. | |
[4] | 李志强. 哈萨克羊及其杂交后代生长发育规律的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2020. |
LI Zhiqiang. Study on the growth and development law of Kazak sheep and their hybrid offspring[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[5] | 刘榜. 家畜育种学(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2019. |
LIU Bang. Livestock Breeding (6 th Ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press. 2019. | |
[6] | 杨红远, 马兴跃. 云上黑山羊生长曲线拟合的多模型比较[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(4): 163-166. |
YANG Hongyuan, MA Xingyue. Multi model comparison of growth curve fitting of black goats[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2022, 58(4): 163-166. | |
[7] | Moreira R P, Pedrosa V B, Paula Roberta Falcão, et al. Curvas de crescimento de fêmeas da raça Ile de France criadas em confinamento, 2016. |
[8] | 孔凡虎, 朱应民, 李渤南, 等. 牙山黑绒山羊生长发育规律的研究[J] 中国草食动物科学, 2017, 37(6): 70-72. |
KONG Fanhu, ZHU Yingmin, LI Bonan, et al. Study on the growth and development law of Yashan Black Cashmere Goat[J]. Chinese Herbivore Science, 2017, 37(6): 70-72. | |
[9] | 周智德, 白天麟, 王占强, 等. 祁连山高寒牧区无角陶赛特羊与甘肃高山细毛羊杂交一代羔羊生长曲线探讨[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2012, 32(4): 16-18. |
ZHOU Zhide, BAI Tianlin, WANG Zhanqiang, et al. Discussion on the growth curve of the first generation of crossbred lambs between hornless Taosaite sheep and Gansu Alpine Fine Wool Sheep in the alpine pastoral area of Qilian Mountain[J]. Chinese Herbivore Science, 2012, 32 (4): 16-18. | |
[10] | 袁飞, 罗海玲, 陈瑜, 等. 南江黄羊早期生长发育曲线拟合研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2012, 48(1): 15-18. |
YUAN Fei, LUO Hailing, CHEN Yu, et al. Study on fitting of early growth and development curve of Nanjiang Yellow sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, 2012, 48(1): 15-18. | |
[11] | 张军霞, 方德成, 贺娜, 等. 高原型藏羊早期生长曲线拟合分析[J] .草业科学, 2021, 38(2): 358-363. |
ZHANG Junxia, FANG Decheng, HE Na, et al. Growth curve fitting analysis of early Tibetan Plateau Sheep[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(2): 358-363. | |
[12] | 田得红, 岳炳辉, 周佰成, 等. 高寒地区无角陶赛特羊与青海藏羊杂交一代羔羊生长发育模型及趋势分析[J]. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2017 (1): 36-37,39. |
TIAN Dehong, YUE Binghui, ZHOU Baicheng, et al. Growth and development model and trend analysis of the first generation of cross between hornless Taosaite sheep and Qinghai Tibetan sheep in Alpine Region[J]. Shanghai Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Communication, 2017(1): 36-37,39. | |
[13] | 石丰运, 党鹏举, 李少斌, 等. 子午岭黑山羊早期生长性能及生长曲线拟合研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2022,(4): 42-46,52. |
SHI Fengyun, DANG Pengju, LI Shaobin, et al. Study on early growth performance and growth curve fitting of Ziwuling black goat[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2022,(4): 42-46,52. | |
[14] | 张国俊, 陈瑜, 陈勇, 等. 南江黄羊快长系早期生长发育规律与产肉性能研究[C]. 第十二届2015中国羊业发展大会论文汇编, 2015: 236-239. |
ZHANG Guojun, CHEN Yu, CHEN Yong, et al. Study on early growth and development law and meat production performance of fast growing line of Nanjiang Yellow sheep[C]. Compilation of papers of the 12th (2015) China Sheep Industry Development Conference, 2015: 236-239. | |
[15] | Satoh D. Model selection among growth curve models that have the same number of parameters[J]. Cogent Mathematics & Statistics, 2019, 6(1). |
[16] | 张浩, 吴常信, 李俊英, 等. 藏鸡和低地鸡种的生长曲线拟合与杂种优势分析[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2005, 41(5): 34-37. |
ZHANG Hao, WU Changxin, LI Junying, et al. Growth curve fitting and Heterosis Analysis of Tibetan and lowland chicken breeds[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, 2005, 41(5): 34-37. | |
[17] | 赵青, 赵艳, 钟土木, 等. 金华猪生长激素基因多态性分析及生长曲线比较[J]. 中国兽医学报 2009, 29(12): 1632-1635. |
ZHAO Qing, ZHAO Yan, ZHONG Tumu, et al. Analysis of growth hormone gene polymorphism and comparison of growth curves in Jinhua Pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2009, 29 (12): 1632-1635. | |
[18] | 梁新亮, 王丽, 谢云龙, 等. 西北高寒牧区不同湖羊杂交组合后代生长模型分析[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(12): 3004-3012. |
LIANG Xinliang, WANG Li, XIE Yunlong, et al. Analysis on growth model of offspring of different Hu sheep hybrids in northwest alpine pastoral area[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(12): 3004-3012. | |
[19] | 曹忻, 赵有璋. 无角陶赛特羔羊和波德代羔羊的生长发育模型[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2006,(2): 15-19. |
CAO Xin, ZHAO Youzhang. Growth and development models of hornless Dorset lamb and Boddai lamb[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2006,(2): 15-19. | |
[20] | 王可, 崔绪奎, 刘昭华, 等. 济宁青山羊生长曲线的拟合与分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(4): 112-115. |
WANG Ke, CUI xukui, LIU Zhaohua, et al. Fitting and analysis of growth curve of Jining Green Goat[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 50(4): 112-115. | |
[21] | 陈玲, 吕晓阳, 王庆增, 等. 湖羊生长发育曲线模型预测及趋势分析. 中国畜牧兽医, 2014, 41(12): 239-243. |
CHEN Ling, LYU Xiaoyang, WANG Qingzeng, et al. Prediction and trend analysis of growth and development curve model of Hu sheep[J]. Chinese Animal Husbandry And Veterinary, 2014, 41(12): 239-243. | |
[22] | 张高振, 姜俊芳, 宋雪梅, 等. 湖羊早期生长曲线的拟合[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2009, 41(12): 31-34. |
ZHANG Gaozhen, JIANG Junfang, SONG Xuemei, et al. Fitting of early growth curve of Hu sheep[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2009, 41(12): 31-34. | |
[23] | 李彦飞, 田可川, 陶卫东, 等. 影响南疆绒山羊早期生长性状的非遗传因素分析[C]. 中国畜牧兽医学会家禽生态学分会学术研讨会论文集, 2014: 57-61. |
LI Yanfei, TIAN Kechuan, TAO Weidong, et al. Analysis of non genetic factors affecting early growth traits of Nanjiang Cashmere Goat[C]. Proceedings of the Symposium of Poultry Ecology Branch of China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society, 2014: 57-61. |
[1] | YANG Mengqi, NAN Shanshan, ZHANG Xiaoyang, WANG Hailiang, LI Jiacheng, NIU Junli, NIE Cunxi, ZHANG Wenju. Effects of fermented cotton meal fiber on growth performance, slaughter performance and intestinal morphology of yellow feather broilers [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 1011-1019. |
[2] | GUAN Jinglin, GUO Tengda, CHEN Yongzhen, LIU Jinsuo, SHI Letian, ZHANG Guanghui, CHEN Pengju. Effects of Different Protein Sources on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Broilers [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2734-2741. |
[3] | SHI Zhang-jing, LI Ying-xue, LIU Yan-feng, LIU Wu-jun, YANG Hui-guo, PAN Yi-qi. Effects of Different Straw Sources NDF on the Production Performance, Organ Development and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Bashibai Sheep [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(7): 1343-1349. |
[4] | WANG Yong-li;Halidai Rehemujiang;Eni Halike;Maierhaba Abudunaibi;Aibibula Yimamu. Effects of the Aerial Parts of Ural Licorice on the Growth Performance and the Blood Characteristics of Bachu Goat [J]. , 2016, 53(1): 190-196. |
[5] | CHEN Xue-ji;LI Xiao-bing;DENG Hai-feng;YANG Kai-lun. Effects of Supplemental GABA on Growth Performance and the Level of Plasma Hormone of Yili Nursing Foals [J]. , 2015, 52(12): 2320-2326. |
[6] | WANG Wen-qi;LUO Yong-ming;LIU Yan-feng;XIAheman;WANG Shi-chang;HOU Guang-tian. Effects of Diets with Different Cotton Stalk Levels of Total Mixed Ration on Growth Performance and Rumen Fermentation Parameters in Sheep [J]. , 2015, 52(11): 2111-2116. |
[7] | LI Hai-ying;ZHANG Li-hua;ZHAI Wei-shuang;LI Xiao-bin;YANG Kai-lun. Effect of Sodium Butyrate Used as Substitute for Antibiotics Feed Additive on Production Performance and Immune Organ Index of White Broilers [J]. , 2014, 51(4): 755-760. |
[8] | YANG Hua;YANG Yong-lin;FENG Jian-li;YAN Yun-feng;LIU Shou-ren. The Comparison of Some Blood Immune Parameters in Sheep [J]. , 2013, 50(11): 2118-2124. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||