AMMI Model Analysis of Yield Data of Xinjiang Sweet Potato Region Test

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.007

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To evaluate the ecological adaptability of different sweet potato varieties, verify the discrimination of various experimental areas in Xinjiang, and screen out new sweet potato varieties suitable for planting in Xinjiang in the hope of providing basis for the breeding and promotion of new sweet potato varieties in the region. 【Method】 AMMI model was used to comprehensively evaluate 5 sweet potato varieties and 3 pilots in the regional experiment of sweet potato varieties in Xinjiang Autonomous Region from 2018 to 2019 and analyze the stability and high yield of 5 sweet potato varieties and the discrimination of 3 pilots. 【Result】 The stability of Z15-1 and H6-1 was higher than that of Xushu 18. Z15-1 was a high and stable yield variety, which could be used as a demonstration variety. H6-1, Indonesian purple sweet potato belonged to low-yield and stable varieties; Yanshu No. 25 and Xushu No. 18 were high-yielding and unstable varieties. Wusu had the highest selection of varieties and had strong representativeness, while Yining had low discrimination. 【Conclusion】 Z15-1 shows good overall performance, and can be popularized and planted in Xinjiang sweet potato producing area. Yanshu No. 25 and Xushu No. 18 are high-yielding and unstable varieties, which can be demonstrated and popularized in local areas.

Key words: sweet potato; AMMI model; stability

摘要：

【目的】评价不同甘薯品种的生态适应性,分析新疆各试验区的鉴别力,筛选出适合新疆种植的甘薯新品种,为新疆甘薯新品种的选育和推广提供依据。【方法】采用AMMI模型对2018~2019年新疆甘薯品种区域试验中的5个甘薯品种、3个试验点综合评价,分析5个甘薯品种的稳定性及丰产性,以及3个试验点的鉴别力。【结果】Z15-1和H6-1的稳定性较强,徐薯18号的稳定性较差;Z15-1属于高产稳产品种,可作为示范推广品种;H6-1、印尼紫薯属于低产稳产品种;烟薯25号和徐薯18号属于高产不稳产品种;乌苏试验点对品种的选择性最高,具有较强的代表性,伊宁试验点对品种的鉴别力低。【结论】Z15-1整体表现较好,可在新疆甘薯产区推广种植;烟薯25号和徐薯18号属于高产不稳产品种,可在局部地区示范推广。

关键词: 甘薯, AMMI模型, 稳定性

CLC Number:

S632.2

WANG Xian, LUO Zhengqian, XU Linli, ZHOU Zhiling, TANG Jun, GAO Haifeng, LIU Enliang, JIN Ping. AMMI Model Analysis of Yield Data of Xinjiang Sweet Potato Region Test[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1093-1098.

王仙, 罗正乾, 徐琳黎, 周志林, 唐君, 高海峰, 刘恩良, 金平. 基于甘薯区试产量数据的AMMI 模型分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1093-1098.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1 Analysis of genotypic and environmental interactions of yield

变异来源 Source of variation	自由度 df	平方和 SS	SS(%)	均方 MS	F值 F-value	Prob.
总变异Total variance	44	16 485 692.00		374 674.80
处理Treatment	14	16 160 775.00		1 154 341.00	106.5 $8 * *$	0.000 1
基因Genotype	4	8 960 140.00	55.44	2 240 035.00	206.8 $3 * *$	0.000 1
环境Environment	2	743 336.30	4.60	371 668.10	34.3 $2 * *$	0.000 1
基因型×环境 Genotype×Environment	8	6 457 298.00	39.96	807 162.30	74.5 $3 * *$	0.000 1
PCA1	5	5 912 805.00	91.57	1 182 561.00	6.5 $2 * *$	0.000 3
IPCA1	3	1 289 967.00	22.60	429 988.90	39.7 $0 * *$	0.000 1
IPCA2	1	2 492 247.00	43.67	2 492 247.00	230.1 $1 * *$	0.000 1
误差Error	30	324 917.00		10 830.57

Table 1 Analysis of genotypic and environmental interactions of yield

变异来源 Source of variation	自由度 df	平方和 SS	SS(%)	均方 MS	F值 F-value	Prob.
总变异Total variance	44	16 485 692.00		374 674.80
处理Treatment	14	16 160 775.00		1 154 341.00	106.5 $8 * *$	0.000 1
基因Genotype	4	8 960 140.00	55.44	2 240 035.00	206.8 $3 * *$	0.000 1
环境Environment	2	743 336.30	4.60	371 668.10	34.3 $2 * *$	0.000 1
基因型×环境 Genotype×Environment	8	6 457 298.00	39.96	807 162.30	74.5 $3 * *$	0.000 1
PCA1	5	5 912 805.00	91.57	1 182 561.00	6.5 $2 * *$	0.000 3
IPCA1	3	1 289 967.00	22.60	429 988.90	39.7 $0 * *$	0.000 1
IPCA2	1	2 492 247.00	43.67	2 492 247.00	230.1 $1 * *$	0.000 1
误差Error	30	324 917.00		10 830.57

Fig.1 The biplot of AMMI1

Fig.2 The biplot of AMMI2

Table 2 Stability parameter of cultivar

品种 Varieties	平均产量 Mean Yield(kg/667m²)	IPCA1	IPCA2	稳定性参数(D_i) Stability parameter (D_i)	位次
Z15-1	2 712.565 7	-10.662 8	-0.357 6	10.67	4
H6-1	1 901.670 9	10.254 2	0.343 9	10.26	5
印尼紫薯 Indonesia purple potato	2 195.723 3	20.901 3	0.700 9	20.91	2
烟薯25号 Yanshu 25	2 677.94	-13.683 4	-0.458 8	13.69	3
徐薯18号 Xushu 18	2 434.005 6	106.858 4	-6.809 3	107.08	1

Table 3 Discernment parameter of test site

试验点 Pilot	产量平均 Mean Yield (kg/667m²)	IPCA1	IPCA2	稳定性参数(D_i) Stability parameter (D_i)	位次
安宁渠Anningqu	2 456.57 5	-20.710 3	-0.694 5	20.72	2
乌苏Wusu	2 420.172 1	21.444 3	0.719 1	21.45	1
伊宁Yining	2 319.321 7	-0.734	-0.024 6	0.73	3

References 22

[1]	岳海旺, 李春杰, 李媛, 等. 河北省春播玉米品种产量稳定性及试验点辨别力综合分析[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(7): 1267-1280.
	YUE Haiwang, LI Chunjie, LI Yuan, et al. Comprehensive analysis of yield stability andtesting site discrimination of spring sowing maize variety in Hebei province[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(7): 1267-1280.
[2]	曹元元, 丁逸帆, 左示敏, 等. 基于GGE 双标图和AMMI模型对江苏省水稻区试品种的丰产性和稳定性分析[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(6): 38-43, 51.
	CAO Yuanyuan, DING Yifan, ZUO Shimin, et al. Analysis of yielding ability and stability of rice varieties tested in Jiangsu province based on GGE biplot and AMMI model[J]. Seed, 2021, 40(6):38-43, 51.
[3]	汪洲涛, 苏炜华, 阙友雄, 等. 应用AMMI和HA-GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种产量稳定性和试点代表性[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(6): 790-800.
	WANG Zhoutao, SU Weihua, QUE Youxiong, et al. Analysis of yield stability and test site representativeness ofsugarcane trials using combined AMMI and HA-GGE biplot models[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(6): 790-800.
[4]	王欣, 李强, 曹清河, 等. 中国甘薯产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3):483-492.
	WANG Xin, LI Qiang, CAO Qinghe, et al. Current status and future prospective of sweet potato production and seed industry in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3):483-492.
[5]	Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT agriculture data. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en.
[6]	Wolfgang J G, Manrique K, Zhan D, et al. Genotype×environmentinteractionsforadiverseset of Sweet potato clonesevaluated across varying ecogeographic conditions in Peru[J]. Crop Science, 2005, 45:2160-2171. DOI URL
[7]	Chiona M. Towards Enhancement of β-Carotene Content of High Dry Mass Sweet potato Genotypes in Zambia[D]. School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 2009.
[8]	Osiru M O, Olanya O M, Adipala E, et al. Yield stability analysis of Ipomoea batatas L. cultivars in diverse environments[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2009, 3:213-220.
[9]	Kivuva B M, Githiri S M, Yencho G C, et al. Genotype × environment interaction for storageroot yield in sweetpotato under managed drought stress conditions[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2014, 6(10): 1-16. DOI URL
[10]	后猛, 李强, 辛国胜, 等. 甘薯块根产量性状生态变异及其与品质的相关性[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(9):1095-1099.
	HOU Meng, LI Qiang, XIN Guosheng, et al. Variability of sweet potato storage root under different ecological environments and its correlation with quality traits[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(9): 1095-1099.
[11]	Abdullah A M, Mohamed M H, Md J A, et al. Farmers’preference yield, and GGE-Biplot analysis-based evaluation of four sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Varieties Grown in Multiple Environments[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13:3730. DOI URL
[12]	卢会翔, 唐道彬, 吴正丹, 等. 甘薯产量、品质及农艺性状的基因型与环境效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(9): 1158-1168.
	LU Huixiang, TANG Daobin, WU Zhengdan, et al. Genotypic variation and environmental effects on yield, quality and agronomic traits of sweet potato[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(9): 1158-1168.
[13]	肖富良, 黄天宝, 吕伟生, 等. 红壤旱地食用型甘薯主要农艺性状的稳定性分析及适应性评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(7):6-12.
	XIAO Fuliang, HUANG Tianbao, LÜ Weisheng, et al. Stability analysis and adaptability evaluation of main agronomic characters of edible sweet potato in Red Upland soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangx, 2021, 33(7):6-12.
[14]	贾赵东, 谢一芝, 尹晴红, 等. 甘薯品种产量性状的稳定性和适应性分析[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2008, 29(2):77-81.
	JIA Zhaodong, XIE Yizhi, YIN Qinghong, et al. Stability and adaptability analysis on yield characters of sweet potato varieties[J]. Joumal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Ed.), 2008, 29(2):77-81.
[15]	陆国权. 甘薯重要品质性状的基因型差异及其环境效应研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2002.
	LU Guoquan. Genotype variation and environmental effects on some important quality traits of sweetpotatoes (Ipomoea batata (L) Lam.)[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2002.
[16]	聂迎彬, 穆培源, 桑伟, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图法在新疆冬小麦区域试验产量分析上的应用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(9):1569-1575.
	NIE Yingbin, MU Peiyuan, SANG Wei, et al. Application of AMMI model and GGE biplot method to yield analysis of winter wheat in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 49(9):1569-1575.
[17]	李鸿文, 林存亮, 李诚, 等. 应用AMMI模型分析冬性饲草型小黑麦品种稳定性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(5):802-807.
	LI Hongwen, LIN Cunliang, LI Cheng, et al. AMMI model was used to analyze the stability of winter forage triticale varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 49(5):802-807.
[18]	穆培源, 庄丽, 张吉贞, 等. 应用AMMI模型分析春小麦区试数据的研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2003,(1):1-5.
	MU Peiyuan, ZHUANG Li, ZHANG Jizhen, et al. Analysis of regional trial data of spring wheat using AMMI model[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2003,(1):1-5.
[19]	王磊, 杨仕华, 沈希宏, 等. 作物品种区试数据分析的主效可加互作可乘模型(AMMI) 图形[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1998, 21(2):18-23.
	WANG Lei, YANG Shihua, SHEN Xihong, et al. Additive main effects and multiplicative iteraction model(AMMI) graphs used in the plant variety trial data analysis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1998, 21(2):18-23.
[20]	陆国权, 黄华宏, 何腾弟. 甘薯维生素C和胡萝卜素含量的基因型、环境及基因型与环境互作效应的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(5): 482-486.
	LU Guoquan, HUANG Huahong, HE Tengdi. Genotype and environmental effects on vitamin C and carotene contents in sweetpotato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(5): 482-486.
[21]	刘丽华, 胡远富, 陈乔, 等. 利用 AMMI模型分析寒地水稻3个品质性状的基因型与环境互作[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10):1849-1855. DOI
	LIU Lihua, HU Yuanfu, CHEN Qiao, et al. Interaction of genotypes with environments for three quality traits of rice in cold region by AMMI model[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(10):1849-1855. DOI
[22]	林坤, 郭凤芝, 葛振勇, 等. 鲁西南地区10个小麦品种丰产性和稳产性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(36):6-10.
	LIN Kun, GUO Fengzhi, GE Zhenyong, et al. High yield and stability of 10 wheat cultivars in Southwest Shandong[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(36):6-10.