不同裂性葡萄品种果皮结构及代谢物质差异分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.010

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 1642-1649.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.010

• 园艺特产·林业·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同裂性葡萄品种果皮结构及代谢物质差异分析

王敏¹(), 韩守安¹, 张雯¹(), 谢辉¹, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木¹, 张付春¹, 钟海霞¹, 弓佳琪², 潘明启¹()

1.新疆农业科学院园艺作物研究所/农业部新疆地区果树科学观测试验站,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆农业大学科学技术学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2021-09-21 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-04
通信作者: 张雯,潘明启
作者简介:王敏(1990-),女,山西灵石人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为生物化学与分子生物学,(E-mail) 807032699@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区青年基金(2021D01B66);现代农业产业技术体系专项资金(CARS-29-zp-8);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育项目(xjkcpy-2020001);国家自然科学基金(31860531)

Analysis of Histological Structure and Cell Wall Metabolites in Different Cracking Grape Varieties

WANG Min¹(), HAN Shouan¹, ZHANG Wen¹(), XIE Hui¹, Aiermaike Caikasimu¹, ZHANG Fuchun¹, ZHONG Haixia¹, GONG Jiaqi², PAN Mingqi¹()

1. Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Pomology (Xinjiang),MOARA / Research Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. College of Science and Technology,Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi,830052,China

Received:2021-09-21 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-04
Correspondence author: ZHANG Wen, PAN Mingqi
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2021D01B66);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-29-zp-8);The key Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of in Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjkcpy-2020001);NSFC(31860531)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同葡萄品种从转色期至成熟期裂果特性的调控因子,为易裂果品种在新疆高效栽培提供数据支撑。【方法】以红地球、里扎玛特、新郁、无核紫、木纳格5个葡萄品种为材料,在转色期至成熟期,测定细胞壁结构性物质水溶性果胶、原果胶、半纤维素含量及代谢水解酶PG、PEP、PL、CE活性,分析采收期细胞壁结构及细胞凋亡情况,研究细胞壁组成成分和细胞凋亡与裂果之间的关系。【结果】红地球为不易裂果品种,里扎玛特为极易裂果品种,其他3个品种为易裂果品种。红地球原果胶采收期含量最高,花后80~90 d原果胶含量增幅最高达到31.6%,里扎玛特的增幅最小为1.1%;花后70~90 d新郁和里扎玛特水溶性果胶含量增幅分别为80.8%和67.2%,红地球水溶性果胶增幅最低,增幅为26.1%,采收期果胶裂解酶酶活性下降;花后80~90 d里扎玛特半纤维素含量显著升高,增幅为134.7%,红地球成熟期含量下降,增幅为-5.9%。里扎玛特角质层不平整有断口与缺链,表皮细胞排列松散细胞间有间隙;新郁亚细胞间由于胞间质降解出现空腔;红地球角质层平整光滑,细胞排列整齐,细胞间无明显间隙。采收期里扎玛特细胞凋亡现象严重,新郁、木纳格、无核紫有不同程度凋亡现象,红地球无明显凋亡现象。【结论】随着采收时间的推移,不易裂果品种原果胶含量及增速显著高于易裂品种,水溶性果胶和半纤维素含量变化规律相反;这3个指标与裂果相关。随着果实的成熟易裂品种在细胞壁代谢相关酶的作用下降解细胞壁结构多糖,果胶转化为水溶性果胶,纤维素转化为半纤维素,致使角质层不平整出现断口与缺链,细胞出现凋亡,降低了果皮的强度及细胞壁的延伸性,诱导了裂果发生。

关键词: 葡萄; 裂果; 细胞壁结构物质; 细胞凋亡

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the regulation factors of grape cracking characteristics of different varieties from the verasion period to the maturity stage, and provide data support for the efficient cultivation of easy cracking fruit varieties in Xinjiang.【Methods】 From the verasion period to the mature period, five varieties were taken as the research objects, through the structural substances of the cell wall, water-soluble pectin, propectin, hemicellulose content and metabolic hydrolase PG, PEP, PL and CE enzyme activity were measured and analyzed and finally cell wall structure observation and TUNEL cell apoptosis detection were combined to explore the relationship between cell wall composition and cell apoptosis of fruit cracking.【Results】 80 to 90 days after flowering, the increase in the propectin content Rizamat was 1.1, Red Globe was 31.6,respectively, the Red Globe had the highest increase and the harvest time content was the highest among the five varieties. 70 to 90 days after flowering, the increase in the water-soluble pectin content was 80.8, 67.2% of Xinyu and Rizamat. The Red Globe had the lowest increase 26.1% and the harvest time content was lowest. The activity of pectatelyases of Red Globe decreased. The hemicellulose content of Rizamat increased significantly at maturity, 80 to 90 days after flowering, the increase was 134.7%, the content of Red Globe decreased and had the lowest increase -5.9%. The results of cell structure showed that Rizamat cuticle was uneven with fracture and chain missing, and epidermal cells were loosely arranged with intercellular space. Cavity appeared between subcellular of Xinyu. The stratum corneum of Red Globe was even and smooth, the cells were arranged orderly, and there was no obvious space between the cells. The TUNEL test showed that the programmed cell death was different, the Rizamat was serious during the harvest period, Xinyu, Munake and Black Monukka was milder, but no obvious finding was found in Red Globe.【Conclusion】 During the ripening process of grape fruits, the content and growth rate of the propectin of the non-cracking varieties were significantly higher than easily cracking varieties. The content and growth rate of the water-soluble pectin and hemicelluloses were opposite. As the fruit matures, the easily cracking varieties cell wall structural polysaccharides under the action of enzymes related to cell wall metabolism, propectin is converted into water-soluble pectin, and cellulose is converted into hemicellulose, resulting in uneven surface with fracture and chain missing, and epidermal cells were loosely arranged with intercellular space, and programmed cell death are obvious, which reduces the strength of the peel and the extensibility of the cell wall, and in turn induces the occurrence of fruit cracking.

Key words: grapes; fruit cracking; cell wall structural material; programmed cell death

中图分类号:

S663.1

王敏, 韩守安, 张雯, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 张付春, 钟海霞, 弓佳琪, 潘明启. 不同裂性葡萄品种果皮结构及代谢物质差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1642-1649.

WANG Min, HAN Shouan, ZHANG Wen, XIE Hui, Aiermaike Caikasimu, ZHANG Fuchun, ZHONG Haixia, GONG Jiaqi, PAN Mingqi. Analysis of Histological Structure and Cell Wall Metabolites in Different Cracking Grape Varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1642-1649.

图/表 5

参考文献 23

[1]	吴建阳, 何冰, 陈妹, 等. 果实裂果机理研究进展与展望[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(4): 38-45.
	WU Jianyang, HE Bing, CHENG Mei, et al. Progress and prospects of mechanisms in fruit cracking[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 44(4): 38-45.
[2]	张群, 周文化, 谭欢, 等. 葡萄果肉组织的能量水平和细胞壁代谢对其自溶软化的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(1):264-272.
	ZHANG Qun, ZHOU Wenhua, TAN Huan, et al. Effects of Energy Level and Cell Wall Metabolism on Aril Breakdown in Grape Fruits[J]. Food Science, 2018, 39(1):264-272. DOI URL
[3]	陈晶晶, 段雅婕, 莫亿伟, 等. 裂果性不同的番荔枝品种果皮中细胞壁代谢相关基因的表达分析[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(5): 769-776, 998.
	CHEN Jingjing, DUAN Yajie, MO Yiwei, et al. Expression analysis of cell wall metabolism geneinpericarp of custard apple cultivars with different fruit cracking characters[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 32(5): 769-776, 998.
[4]	高美玲, 于长宝, 李佳益. 小型西瓜果皮酶系与裂果性的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(10): 228-230.
	GAO Meilin, YU Changbao, LI Jiayi. Relationship between pericarp enzyme system and fruit cracking in small watermelon[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(10): 228-230.
[5]	唐岩. 枣裂果机制及其影响因素的研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2013
	TANG Yan. Research in Mechanism and Factors of Fruit Cracking of Ziziphus jujube[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
[6]	张川, 王亚晨, 崔守尧, 等. 耐裂果与易裂果番茄果实发育过程中果实组织衰老与裂果的关系[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(4):534-542.
	ZHANG Chuan, WANG Yachen, CUI Shouyao, et al. The relationship between fruit tissue senescence and fruit cracking incracking-resistant and susceptible tomato during fruit ripening[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016, 39(4):534-542.
[7]	丁改秀, 王保明, 仓国营, 等. ‘凯特'杏成熟期果面遇雨积水是裂果的主要诱因[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(9):1103-1110.
	DING Gaixiu, WANG Baoming, CANG Guoying, et al. The stagnant rain water on the fruit surface causes fruit cracking during maturation in apricot[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(9):1103-1110.
[8]	王保明, 下改秀, 王小原, 等. 枣果实裂果的组织结构及水势变化的原因[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, (21): 4558-4568.
	WANG Baoming, DING Gaixiu, WANG Xiaoyuan, et al. Changes of Histological Structure and Water Potential of Huping Jujube Fruit Cracking[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,(21): 4558-4568.
[9]	王旭旭, 樊秀彩, 李傲. 葡萄品种资源裂果性状调查与分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(11): 2099-2108.
	WANG Xuxu, FAN Xiucai, LI Ao, et al. Investigation and Analysis on Cracking Trait in Grape Berry[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43(11):2099-2108.
[10]	Opara L U, Studman C J, Banks N H. Fruit skin splitting and cracking. Horticultural Reviews, Volume 19[M]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997:217-262.
[11]	Zhang T, Tang H, Vavylonis D, et al. Disentangling loosening from softening: insights into primary cell wall structure[J]. The Plant Journal, 2019, 100(25): 1101-1117. DOI URL
[12]	Rysuke Yokoyama. A Genomic Perspective on the Evolutionary Diversity of the Plant Cell Wall[J]. Plants, 2020, (9): 1195.
[13]	裴健翔, 李燕青, 程存刚, 等. 不同钙制剂对‘寒富'苹果果实硬度及相关细胞壁代谢物质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(9):1059-1066.
	PEI Jianxiang, LI Yanqing, CHENG Cungang, et al. Effects of different calcium agents on fruit firmness and related cell wall metabolites in‘Hanfu'apple[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(9):1059-1066.
[14]	李建国, 黄旭明, 黄辉白. 裂果易发性不同的荔枝品种果皮中细胞壁代谢酶活性的比较[J]. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2003,(2):141-146.
	LI Jianguo, HUANG Xuming, HUANG Huibai. Comparison of the Activities of Enzymes Related to Cell-Wall Metabolism in Pericarp between Litchi Cultivars Susceptible and Resis-tant to Fruit Cracking[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2003,(2):141-146.
[15]	郭红彦, 白晋华, 段风琴, 等. 钙处理对‘壶瓶枣'裂果细胞壁降解酶活性及组织结构的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(8):1486-1494.
	GUO Hongyan, BAI Jinhua, DUAN Fengqin, et al. Effect of Ca Cl2 Treatment on Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes Activities and Microstructure of Fruit Cracking of Zizyhpus jujuba Mill. ‘Huping zao'[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46(8):1486-1494.
[16]	刘欢, 林敏娟, 高疆生, 等. 枣果皮细胞壁代谢酶活性与抗裂果的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(5):845-854. DOI
	LIU Huan, LIN Minjuan, GAO Jiangsheng, et al. Study on the Relationship between the Activity of Cell Wall Metabolic Enzymes and Anti-Cracked in Jujube Peel[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(5):845-854. DOI
[17]	Hoda A, Khalils H A. Cracking and fruit quality of pomegranate(Punica granatum L.) as affected by preharvest sprays of some growth regulators and mineral nutrients[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Ornamental Plants, 2013, 5(2): 71-76.
[18]	杜巍, 李新岗, 王长柱, 等. 枣裂果机制研究[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(3):374-381.
	DU Wei, LI Xingang, WANG Changzhu, et al. Mechanism of fruit cracking in Zizyphus jujuba[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012, 29(3):374-381.
[19]	庞洪翔, 廖康, 吴少鹏, 等. 木纳格等葡萄品种果实组织结构差异分析[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2015, 38(5):370-375.
	PANG Hongxiang, LIAO Kang, WU Shaopeng, et al. Analysis on Structural Difference of the Fruit of Munake Grape Varieties[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2015, 38(5):370-375.
[20]	刘世鹏, 文欣, 刘申. 枣果皮结构与枣裂果性的相关性[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(4):20-24.
	LIU Shipcng, WEN Xin, LI Shen. Correlation of Fruit Crack and Anatomical Structure in Jujube Fruit[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(4):20-24.
[21]	Li W C, Wu J Y, Zhang H N, et al. Denovo assembly and characterization of pericarp transcriptome and identification of Candidate genes in response to fruit cracking in Litchi chinensis Sonn[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15(10): 17667-17685. DOI URL
[22]	丁勤, 韩明玉, 田玉命. 油桃裂果与膜脂过氧化的关系[J]. 西北农业学报, 2004, 13(4): 200-202, 206.
	DING Qin, HAN Mingyu, TIAN Yuming. Effects of Fruit Cracking on Accumulation of Superoxide Free Radical and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation of Nectarine Fruit during Maturation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2004, 13(4): 200-202, 206.
[23]	郭淑华. 果树果实的裂果及其防止措施研宄进展[J]. 现代园艺, 2013, (9):37-38.
	GUO Shuhua. Progress in research on fruit cracking and its prevention measures in fruit trees[J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2013,(9):37-38.

品种 Grape variety	浸果24 h累计裂果率 The cumulative rate of fruit cracking after 24 hours(%)
品种 Grape variety	花后70 d	花后80 d	花后90 d
新郁 Xinyu	44.00±3.46^B	52.00±2.00^B	64.67±1.16^B
红地球 Red Globe	0.00±0.00^D	1.33±1.16^C	3.33±1.16^C
里扎玛特 Rizamat	76.67±1.16^A	92.33±2.00^A	99.33±1.16^A
木纳格 Munake	38.67±1.16^C	52.67±3.06^B	62.00±2.00^B
无核紫 Black Monukka	43.33±3.06^BC	56.67±1.16^B	63.33±3.06^B

品种 Grape variety	浸果24 h累计裂果率 The cumulative rate of fruit cracking after 24 hours(%)
品种 Grape variety	花后70 d	花后80 d	花后90 d
新郁 Xinyu	44.00±3.46^B	52.00±2.00^B	64.67±1.16^B
红地球 Red Globe	0.00±0.00^D	1.33±1.16^C	3.33±1.16^C
里扎玛特 Rizamat	76.67±1.16^A	92.33±2.00^A	99.33±1.16^A
木纳格 Munake	38.67±1.16^C	52.67±3.06^B	62.00±2.00^B
无核紫 Black Monukka	43.33±3.06^BC	56.67±1.16^B	63.33±3.06^B

品种 Grape variety	角质层厚度 Thethickness of cuticle (μm)	表皮细胞长 (μm)	表皮细胞宽 (μm)	表皮细胞面积 The thickness of cuticle (μm²)	亚表皮细胞长 (μm)	亚表皮细胞宽 (μm)	亚表皮细胞面积 The thickness of cuticle (μm²)
新郁 Xinyu	2.53±0.56^C	45.62±0.41^A	16.34±0.28^A	526.15±13.16^A	103.36±0.2^A	45.37±0.42^A	3 235.23±38.37^A
红地球 RedGlobe	3.68±0.04^B	33.75±0.28^B	16.10±0.23^A	295.06±8.90^C	65.24±0.26^D	43.91±0.34^A	1 980.33±33.06^C
里扎玛特 Rizamat	4.12±0.12^A	45.27±0.45^A	15.89±0.08^A	424.44±8.30^B	83.24±1.39^C	36.08±0.54^B	1 905.63±67.46^C
木纳格 Munake	2.50±0.02^C	28.72±0.26^C	5.76±0.04^C	157.59±4.96^D	95.68±0.78^B	35.19±0.13^B	2 786.36±33.17^B
无核紫 Black Monukka	2.12±0.03^D	28.39±0.14^C	7.62±0.04^B	219.55±5.68^D	45.97±0.76^E	20.63±0.04^C	608.76±20.64^D

品种 Grape variety	角质层厚度 Thethickness of cuticle (μm)	表皮细胞长 (μm)	表皮细胞宽 (μm)	表皮细胞面积 The thickness of cuticle (μm²)	亚表皮细胞长 (μm)	亚表皮细胞宽 (μm)	亚表皮细胞面积 The thickness of cuticle (μm²)
新郁 Xinyu	2.53±0.56^C	45.62±0.41^A	16.34±0.28^A	526.15±13.16^A	103.36±0.2^A	45.37±0.42^A	3 235.23±38.37^A
红地球 RedGlobe	3.68±0.04^B	33.75±0.28^B	16.10±0.23^A	295.06±8.90^C	65.24±0.26^D	43.91±0.34^A	1 980.33±33.06^C
里扎玛特 Rizamat	4.12±0.12^A	45.27±0.45^A	15.89±0.08^A	424.44±8.30^B	83.24±1.39^C	36.08±0.54^B	1 905.63±67.46^C
木纳格 Munake	2.50±0.02^C	28.72±0.26^C	5.76±0.04^C	157.59±4.96^D	95.68±0.78^B	35.19±0.13^B	2 786.36±33.17^B
无核紫 Black Monukka	2.12±0.03^D	28.39±0.14^C	7.62±0.04^B	219.55±5.68^D	45.97±0.76^E	20.63±0.04^C	608.76±20.64^D

不同裂性葡萄品种果皮结构及代谢物质差异分析

Analysis of Histological Structure and Cell Wall Metabolites in Different Cracking Grape Varieties

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.
[2]	朱学慧, 张雯, 马云龙, 何鹏飞, 韩守安, 王敏, 田嘉, 谢辉. 不同生态环境下葡萄光合特性差异性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1913-1921.
[3]	王曼, 张政, 伊丽达娜·迪力夏提, 吴斌. 木纳格葡萄谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶VvGST1基因克隆与序列分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1922-1930.
[4]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[5]	贺腾飞, 刘英玉, 张柳青, 陈旺, 李泽亚, 胡芸, 蒋金豆, 祖力胡马尔·艾力. 新疆牛羊源金黄色葡萄球菌D353质粒pD353序列分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1806-1812.
[6]	韦伟, 单守明, 徐文娣, 李光宗. 山葡萄‘双优’组织培养生根期愈伤组织的转录组分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1451-1459.
[7]	周伟权, 侯毅兴, 刘春燕, 阿克居里德孜·努尔改里得, 薛靖, 李树德, 周龙. 不同葡萄砧穗组合嫁接对根系生长特性及解剖结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1170-1180.
[8]	常雪花, 闫波雯, 翟荣臻, 张政, 吴斌, 魏佳. 二氧化硫对木纳格葡萄采后糖含量及糖代谢途径的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1216-1225.
[9]	高帆, 马忠杰, 许贵善, 王彦, 彭婉婉, 冯昕炜, 袁国宏. 日粮中添加不同比例葡萄籽对多浪羊十二指肠细菌菌群结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1020-1027.
[10]	王勇, 苏来曼·艾则孜, 李玉玲, 孙锋, 伍国红, 杨涛, 郭平峰. 红宝石无核×红旗特早葡萄杂交后代核性状遗传分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 872-879.
[11]	陈丽靓, 鲁倩君, 马媛媛, 刘迎, 赵宝龙, 孙军利. 不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 880-888.
[12]	钟海霞, 孟阿静, 周晓明, 纪佳慧, 乔江霞, 潘明启, 张付春, 伍新宇. 木纳格葡萄种子发育过程中生理生化指标变化特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 601-607.
[13]	许昌, 张光弟, 张浩宇, 贾毅男, 张昆明, 王江龙, 侯晓健. 叶面喷施硅素对玫瑰香果实风味物质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 359-367.
[14]	梁雎, 刘国宏, 王保民, 何桥, 阿布来克·尼亚孜, 郭红梅, 李兴婷, 任红松. 不同来源葡萄种质资源果实叶酸含量及ISSR比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2982-2992.
[15]	户金鸽, 白世践. 无核白葡萄营养系果实品质及葡萄干特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2751-2763.