调亏灌溉对滴灌核桃树土壤温度及产量的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.012

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 95-104.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.012

• 园艺特产·植物保护·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

调亏灌溉对滴灌核桃树土壤温度及产量的影响

张纪圆¹(), 赵经华¹(), 杨文新¹, 姜有为¹, 廖康², 哈力旦木·吐尔迪³, 热纳古丽·库尔班³

1.新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
3.且末县自然资源局红枣科技推广中心,新疆且末 841900

收稿日期:2020-12-23 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-02-18
通信作者: 赵经华
作者简介:张纪圆 (1994-),女,河南民权人,硕士研究生,研究方向为灌溉节水,(E-mail) zjy18299736479@126.com
基金资助:
新疆教育厅高校科研计划(XJEDU2019Y019);新疆农业大学博士后经费项目;水利工程重点学科项目(SLXK2019-01)

Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Soil Temperature and Yield of Walnut Trees under Drip Irrigation

ZHANG Jiyuan¹(), ZHAO Jinghua¹(), YANG Wenxin¹, JIANG Youwei¹, LIAO Kang², Halidanmu Tuerdi³, Renaguli Kuerban³

1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. College of Forestry and Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
3. Red Jujube Technology Extension Center, Qiemo County Natural Resources Bureau, Qiemo Xinjiang 841900, China

Received:2020-12-23 Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-02-18
Correspondence author: ZHAO Jinghua
Supported by:
University Scientific R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Education Department(XJEDU2019Y019);Postdoctoral Funding Project of Xinjiang Agricultural University;Key Discipline Project of Water Conservancy Engineering(SLXK2019-01)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究调亏灌溉对干旱区滴灌核桃树土壤温度的影响,分析最有利的灌水模式。【方法】研究3个不同灌水量(正常灌水ET_C、轻度缺水75% ET_C和中度缺水50% ET_C),7个处理不同程度水分亏缺对土壤温度、SPAD值、果实体积和产量的影响。【结果】调亏度越大,土壤温度越高,在调亏的生育期内有增温的效果。油脂转化期(Ⅴ)之前,随着土层深度的增加,土壤温度在降低,表现为5 cm>10 cm>20 cm>30 cm>40 cm。在油脂转化期(Ⅴ)和成熟期(Ⅵ)时,开花坐果期+果实膨大期(Ⅱ + Ⅲ)进行中度缺水土壤温度最高。开花坐果期(Ⅱ)调亏时,灌前与灌后的土壤温度差最小。调亏灌溉促进SPAD值的增加,在开花坐果期(Ⅱ)进行调亏果实体积最大。开花坐果期(Ⅱ)轻度缺水获得最高产量为4 150.70 kg/(hm²),水分利用效率(WUE)最高,达到9.25 kg/(hm²·mm)。【结论】结合土壤温度、果实体积、产量及WUE情况,开花坐果期(Ⅱ)轻度缺水是最有益处的处理。

关键词: 滴灌; 调亏灌溉; 核桃树; 土壤温度; 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the effect of regulated deficit irrigation on the soil temperature of walnut trees by drip irrigation in arid areas and determine the most favorable irrigation pattern. 【Methods】 The effects of three different irrigation levels (normal irrigation ET_C, mild water deficit 75% ET_C, and moderate water shortage 50% ET_C) and seven different treatments on soil temperature, SPAD value, fruit volume and yield were studied. 【Results】 The greater the deficit adjustment, the higher the soil temperature, and the more efficient effect of increasing temperature during the growth period of deficit adjustment. Before the fat conversion period(Ⅴ), the soil temperature decreased with the increase of soil depth, which was 5 cm>10 cm> 20 cm> 30 cm> 40 cm. During the period of Ⅴand maturity(Ⅵ), the temperature of soil with moderate water shortage was the highest during the flowering and fruiting stage + fruit expansion stage (Ⅱ + Ⅲ). The difference of soil temperature between pre-irrigation and post-irrigation was the smallest when the deficit was adjusted during periodⅡ. Regulated deficit irrigation promoted the increase of SPAD value, and the volume of regulated deficit fruit was the largest during periodⅡ. The highest yield was 4,150.70 kg/hm ² at light water shortage during Ⅱ period, and the water use efficiency (WUE)was the highest, reaching 9.25 kg/(hm ²·mm). 【Conclusion】 Considering soil temperature, fruit volume, yield, and WUE, mild water shortage during periodⅡis the most beneficial treatment.

Key words: drip irrigation; regulated deficit irrigation; walnut tree; soil temperature; yield

中图分类号:

张纪圆, 赵经华, 杨文新, 姜有为, 廖康, 哈力旦木·吐尔迪, 热纳古丽·库尔班. 调亏灌溉对滴灌核桃树土壤温度及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 95-104.

ZHANG Jiyuan, ZHAO Jinghua, YANG Wenxin, JIANG Youwei, LIAO Kang, Halidanmu Tuerdi, Renaguli Kuerban. Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Soil Temperature and Yield of Walnut Trees under Drip Irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 95-104.

图/表 9

表1 研究区土壤质地组成

Table 1 Soil texture composition of the study area

土层 Soil layer (cm)	容重 Bulk density (g/cm³)	土壤粒径比例Soil particle size proportion(%)				土壤性质 Soil properties
土层 Soil layer (cm)	容重 Bulk density (g/cm³)	<0.002 mm	0.002~0.05 mm	0.05~2 mm	>2 mm	土壤性质 Soil properties
0~20	1.38	7.0	56.5	36.5	0	粉砂壤土
20~40	1.42	7.2	67.9	24.9	0	粉砂壤土
40~60	1.40	2.9	15.8	81.3	0	壤砂土
60~80	1.38	0.1	1.7	98.2	0	细砂
80~100	1.35	0.2	8.0	91.8	0	细砂

表2 试验设计

Table 2 Test design

生育期Growth period	时间Time	W₀	W₁	W₂	W₃	W₄	W₅	W₆
萌芽期 (Ⅰ) Germination Period	4.05~4.10	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C
开花坐果期(Ⅱ) Flowering and fruit bearing period	4.11~5.06	ET_C	75%ET_C	50%ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	75%ET_C	50%ET_C
果实膨大期(Ⅲ) Fruit enlarging period	5.07~6.02	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	75%ET_C	50%ET_C	75%ET_C	50%ET_C
硬核期 (Ⅳ) Stone hardening period	6.03~7.08	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C
油脂转化期(Ⅴ) Fat conversion period	7.09~8.31	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C
成熟期(Ⅵ) Maturity	9.01~9.25	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C	ET_C

表3 各处理不同土层深度14:00土壤温度

Table 3 Different soil layers with different treatment depths 14:00 Soil temperature

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	处理 Treatment	开花坐果期(Ⅱ) Flowering and fruit bearing period	果实膨大期(Ⅲ) Fruit enlarging period	硬核期(Ⅳ) Stone hardening period	油脂转化期(Ⅴ) Fat conversion period	成熟期(Ⅵ) Maturity
5	W₀	15.03^c	17.29^c	20.06^cd	19.48^d	18.94^c
	W₁	15.13^c	15.70^d	19.86^d	19.97^c	17.40^e
	W₂	15.31^c	15.60^d	20.36^c	19.16^d	17.42^e
	W₃	16.48^b	16.82^c	20.1 $5 c d$	20.19^c	18.15^d
	W₄	16.39^b	18.07^b	20.79^b	20.81^b	19.96^a
	W₅	16.37^b	17.8 $2 b c$	20.7 $0 b c$	20.72^b	19.52^b
	W₆	18.56^a	20.61^a	23.41^a	22.42^a	19.96^a
10	W₀	14.37^d	15.87^c	19.28^e	19.41^c	18.36^b
	W₁	14.97^c	15.42^d	19.79^d	19.12^c	17.56^c
	W₂	15.04^c	15.23^d	19.76^d	19.20^c	16.87^d
	W₃	15.48^b	15.6 $7 c d$	19.67^d	19.74^b	17.60^c
	W₄	15.37^b	16.72^b	20.20^c	19.23^c	18.42^b
	W₅	15.37^b	16.57^b	21.07^b	19.6 $3 b c$	17.1 $9 c d$
	W₆	17.42^a	19.16^a	22.19^a	21.18^a	19.41^a
20	W₀	14.35^f	15.53^e	19.01^f	19.23^d	18.22^b
	W₁	14.59^e	15.06^f	19.19^e	19.43^c	17.61^c
	W₂	14.58^e	14.75^g	19.25^e	19.25^d	17.25^c
	W₃	15.44^b	15.64^d	19.61^d	19.46^c	17.75^b
	W₄	14.75^d	15.82^c	19.77^c	18.82^e	17.78^b
	W₅	14.92^c	16.08^b	20.36^b	19.69^b	17.23^c
	W₆	16.51^a	18.12^a	21.77^a	21.78^a	19.13^a
30	W₀	13.96^g	15.09^e	18.61^f	19.17^d	18.40^b
	W₁	14.32^f	15.01^f	19.21^d	18.72^e	17.51^c
	W₂	14.52^e	14.81^g	19.05^e	19.63^c	17.59^c
	W₃	15.31^b	15.60^d	19.19^d	19.63^c	18.00^b
	W₄	14.70^d	15.74^c	19.63^c	19.33^d	17.9 $6 b c$
	W₅	14.80^c	16.07^b	20.37^b	20.11^b	17.61^c
	W₆	16.81^a	18.51^a	22.20^a	22.08^a	19.84^a
40	W₀	13.79^g	14.92^e	18.48^f	19.07^g	18.15^b
	W₁	14.22^f	14.96^d	19.03^d	19.57^d	17.76^a
	W₂	14.34^e	14.80^f	18.92^e	20.13^b	19.82^b
	W₃	15.15^b	15.54^c	19.33^c	19.36^f	17.99^b
	W₄	14.44^d	15.56^c	19.40^c	19.50^e	18.21^b
	W₅	14.54^c	15.88^b	20.28^b	19.86^c	17.79^b
	W₆	16.08^a	17.84^a	21.73^a	21.62^a	20.07^a

表3 各处理不同土层深度14:00土壤温度

Table 3 Different soil layers with different treatment depths 14:00 Soil temperature

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	处理 Treatment	开花坐果期(Ⅱ) Flowering and fruit bearing period	果实膨大期(Ⅲ) Fruit enlarging period	硬核期(Ⅳ) Stone hardening period	油脂转化期(Ⅴ) Fat conversion period	成熟期(Ⅵ) Maturity
5	W₀	15.03^c	17.29^c	20.06^cd	19.48^d	18.94^c
	W₁	15.13^c	15.70^d	19.86^d	19.97^c	17.40^e
	W₂	15.31^c	15.60^d	20.36^c	19.16^d	17.42^e
	W₃	16.48^b	16.82^c	20.1 $5 c d$	20.19^c	18.15^d
	W₄	16.39^b	18.07^b	20.79^b	20.81^b	19.96^a
	W₅	16.37^b	17.8 $2 b c$	20.7 $0 b c$	20.72^b	19.52^b
	W₆	18.56^a	20.61^a	23.41^a	22.42^a	19.96^a
10	W₀	14.37^d	15.87^c	19.28^e	19.41^c	18.36^b
	W₁	14.97^c	15.42^d	19.79^d	19.12^c	17.56^c
	W₂	15.04^c	15.23^d	19.76^d	19.20^c	16.87^d
	W₃	15.48^b	15.6 $7 c d$	19.67^d	19.74^b	17.60^c
	W₄	15.37^b	16.72^b	20.20^c	19.23^c	18.42^b
	W₅	15.37^b	16.57^b	21.07^b	19.6 $3 b c$	17.1 $9 c d$
	W₆	17.42^a	19.16^a	22.19^a	21.18^a	19.41^a
20	W₀	14.35^f	15.53^e	19.01^f	19.23^d	18.22^b
	W₁	14.59^e	15.06^f	19.19^e	19.43^c	17.61^c
	W₂	14.58^e	14.75^g	19.25^e	19.25^d	17.25^c
	W₃	15.44^b	15.64^d	19.61^d	19.46^c	17.75^b
	W₄	14.75^d	15.82^c	19.77^c	18.82^e	17.78^b
	W₅	14.92^c	16.08^b	20.36^b	19.69^b	17.23^c
	W₆	16.51^a	18.12^a	21.77^a	21.78^a	19.13^a
30	W₀	13.96^g	15.09^e	18.61^f	19.17^d	18.40^b
	W₁	14.32^f	15.01^f	19.21^d	18.72^e	17.51^c
	W₂	14.52^e	14.81^g	19.05^e	19.63^c	17.59^c
	W₃	15.31^b	15.60^d	19.19^d	19.63^c	18.00^b
	W₄	14.70^d	15.74^c	19.63^c	19.33^d	17.9 $6 b c$
	W₅	14.80^c	16.07^b	20.37^b	20.11^b	17.61^c
	W₆	16.81^a	18.51^a	22.20^a	22.08^a	19.84^a
40	W₀	13.79^g	14.92^e	18.48^f	19.07^g	18.15^b
	W₁	14.22^f	14.96^d	19.03^d	19.57^d	17.76^a
	W₂	14.34^e	14.80^f	18.92^e	20.13^b	19.82^b
	W₃	15.15^b	15.54^c	19.33^c	19.36^f	17.99^b
	W₄	14.44^d	15.56^c	19.40^c	19.50^e	18.21^b
	W₅	14.54^c	15.88^b	20.28^b	19.86^c	17.79^b
	W₆	16.08^a	17.84^a	21.73^a	21.62^a	20.07^a

图1 Ⅱ期各层灌水前后土壤温度的日变化

Fig.1 Diurnal variation of soil temperature before and after irrigation in each layer of stage Ⅱ

图2 Ⅲ期各层灌水前后土壤温度日变化

Fig.2 Diurnal variation of soil temperature before and after irrigation in each layer of stage Ⅲ

图3 Ⅱ + Ⅲ期各层灌水前后土壤温度日变化

Fig.3 Diurnal variation of soil temperature before and after irrigation in each layer of stage Ⅱ + Ⅲ

图4 调亏灌溉下核桃叶片的SPAD值

Fig.4 SPAD value of walnut leaves under regulated deficit irrigation

图5 调亏灌溉下核桃树果实体积变化

Fig.5 Changes of walnut tree fruit volume under regulated deficit irrigation

表4 调亏灌溉下核桃产量和WUE变化

Table 4 Walnut yield and water use efficiency under regulated deficit irrigation

处理 Treat ment	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	耗水量 Water consumption (mm)	水分利用效率 WUE [kg/(hm²·mm)]
W₀	3 874.95^b	461.34^a	8.40^c
W₁	4 150.70^a	448.83^b	9.25^a
W₂	3 787.88^bc	438.50^bc	8.64^b
W₃	3 769.69^bc	445.24^b	8.47^bc
W₄	3 651.28^c	440.07^bc	8.30^c
W₅	3 534.34^d	433.89^c	8.15^d
W₆	3 274.51^e	416.79^d	7.86^e

参考文献 30

[1]	李晶, 王俊杰, 陈金木. 新疆水权改革经验与启示[J]. 中国水利, 2017,(13):17-19.
	LI Jing, WANG Junjie, CHEN Jinmu. Reform of water right system in Xinjiang: experiences and suggestions[J]. China Water Resources, 2017,(13):17-19.
[2]	热奴·尼扎木东. 推进南疆特色林果业发展的路径思考[J]. 南方农业, 2019, 13(12):129-130.
	Renu Nunizhamudong. Thinking on the path of promoting the development of characteristic forestry and fruit industry in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Southern Agriculture, 2019, 13(12):129-130.
[3]	郑和祥, 郭克贞, 郝万龙. 作物生长指标与土壤水分状况及地温关系研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(3):210-212.
	ZHENG Hexiang, GUO Kezhen, HAO Wanlong. Study on the relation of soil moisture and soil temperature to crop growth[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 18(3):210-212.
[4]	Heloisa O, Dos Santos R C C V. Effect of Soil Temperature in the Emergence of Maize Seeds[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2019, 11(1).
[5]	Curtin D B M H H. Temperature and moisture effects on microbial biomass and soil organic matter mineralization[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 6(76):2055-2067.
[6]	滑磊. 果树生长与土壤条件的关系[J]. 河北果树, 2016,(3):3-5.
	HUA Lei. Relationship between fruit tree growth and soil conditions[J]. The Fruit Trees in Hebei, 2016,(3):3-5.
[7]	张建兵, 熊黑钢, 李宝富, 等. 干旱区农田土壤水分地温变化规律及其相互关系[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(2):127-133.
	ZHANG Jianbing, XIONG Heigang, LI Baofu, et al. The variation rule and interrelationship of farmland soil moisture content and ground temperature in arid areas[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(2):127-133.
[8]	李萌, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 张江辉, 等. 不同水分处理下香梨地土壤温度变化特征的研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2015,(8):29-32.
	LI Meng, HU Dantumaerbai, ZHANG Jianghui, et al. A study on characteristic of soil temperature in pear field under different water treatments[J]. Water-Saving Irrigation, 2015,(8):29-32.
[9]	李仙岳, 郭宇, 丁宗江, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对不同时间尺度地温与玉米产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(9):247-256.
	LI Xianyue, GUO Yu, DING Zongjiang, et al. Influence of different film mulchings on soil temperature at different time scales and maize yield[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(9):247-256.
[10]	何振嘉. 覆盖方式对涌泉根灌枣树土壤水热效应及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(12):130-139.
	HE Zhenjia. Effects of covering methods on soil hydrothermal effect and yield of jujube trees under bubbled-root effects[J]. China Agricultural Science and Technology Daily, 2018, 20(12):130-139.
[11]	Meng Duan J X X M. Modeling water and heat transfer in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum applied to maize growth under plastic film mulching[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2019, 2(6):144-161. DOI URL
[12]	邹慧, 黄兴法, 龚时宏. 水分调亏对地下滴灌夏玉米田水热动态的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2012, 43(9):72-77.
	ZOU Hui, HUANG Xingfa, GONG Shihong. Effects of Water Deficit on Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes in Subsurface Drip Irrigated Summer Corn Field[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2012, 43(9):72-77.
[13]	卫新东, 贺军奇, 汪有科. 控水条件下桃树地土壤温度变化特征研究[J]. 节水灌溉. 2011(6):7-9.
	WEI Xindong, HE Junqi, WANG Youke. Study on Variation Characteristic of Soil Temperature under Water-control in Peach Garden[J]. Water-Saving Irrigation, 2011,(6):7-9.
[14]	S. Andersson S I N. Infuence of pH and temperature on microbial activity, substrate availability of soil-solution bacteria and leaching of dissolved organic carbon in a mor humus[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2001,(6).
[15]	程福厚, 李绍华, 孟昭清. 调亏灌溉条件下鸭梨营养生长、产量和果实品质反应的研究[J]. 果树学报, 2003,(1):22-26.
	CHENG Fuhou, LI Shaohua, MENG Zhaoqing. Study on nutrient growth yield and fruit quality of Pear under regulated deficit irrigation[J]. Journal of Fruit Trees, 2003,(1):22-26.
[16]	赵霞, 张芮, 成自勇, 等. 不同生育期调亏灌溉对荒漠绿洲区葡萄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(10):20-23.
	ZHAO Xia, ZHANG Rui, CHENG Ziyong, et al. Effects of controlled deficit irrigation on grape growth, yield and quality in desert oasis area.[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 36(10):20-23.
[17]	杨虎, 戈长水, 应武, 等. 遮荫对水稻冠层叶片SPAD值及光合、形态特性参数的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3):580-587.
	YANG Hu, GE Zhangshui, YING Wu, et al. Effects of shading on SPAD values, photosynthetic and morphological characteristics of rice canopy leaves[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2014, 20(3):580-587.
[18]	何钊全, 成自勇, 张芮, 等. 灌水控制上限对酿造葡萄地积温和生长特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(6):32-37.
	HE Zhaoquan, CHENG Ziyong, ZHANG Rui, et al. Effects of irrigation upper control limit to the accumulated soil temperature and growth characteristics of wine grape[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(6):32-37.
[19]	张俊鹏, 刘祖贵, 孙景生, 等. 不同水分和覆盖处理对土壤水热和夏玉米生长的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(2):25-28.
	ZHANG Junpeng, LIU Zugui, SUN Jingsheng, et al. Effects of Different Moisture and Mulching Treatments on Soil Hydrothermal Regimes and Summer Maize Growth[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(2):25-28.
[20]	刘春芬, 刘文兆, 林文, 等. 黄土塬区不同地膜覆盖度下土壤水热状况研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(6):62-67.
	LIU Chunfen, LIU Wenzhao, LIN Wen, et al. Soil Hydrothermal Status Under Different Degrees of Film Mulching Coverage on the Loess Tableland[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(6):62-67.
[21]	赵经华, 洪明, 马英杰, 等. 不同灌水处理对干旱区滴灌核桃树土壤温度的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(6):327-333.
	ZHAO Jinghua, HONG Ming, MA Yingjie, et al. Effect of Different Irrigation Treatments on Soil Temperature of Walnut Tree Irrigated by Drip Irrigation in Arid Area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(6):327-333.
[22]	许耀照, 张芬琴, 陈修斌, 等. 水分胁迫对彩椒幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(2):182-189.
	XU Yaozhao, ZHANG Fenqin, CHEN Xiubin, et al. Effects of water stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of color pepper seedlings[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(2):182-189.
[23]	曾化伟. 土壤水分与施氮量对辣椒部分生理特性及产量品质的影响[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学, 2007.
	ZENG Huawei. Effects of soil moisture and nitrogen application on physiological characteristics and yield and quality of pepper[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2007.
[24]	李磊. 调亏灌溉对酿酒葡萄综合特性及葡萄酒质量的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2017.
	LI Lei. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on wine grapes comprehensive characteristics and wine quality[D]. Yinchuan: Ninxia University, 2017.
[25]	沈媛媛. 不同水分胁迫对核桃叶片SPAD及光合特性的影响研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2017.
	SHEN Yuanyuan. SPAD and photosynthetic characteristics of Walnut leaves under different water stress[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2017.
[26]	崔宁博, 杜太生, 李忠亭, 等. 不同生育期调亏灌溉对温室梨枣品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7):32-38.
	CUI Ningbo, DU Taisheng, LI Zhongting, et al. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation at different growth stages on greenhouse pear-jujube quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(7):32-38.
[27]	武阳, 王伟, 雷廷武, 等. 调亏灌溉对滴灌成龄香梨果树生长及果实产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(11):118-124.
	WU Yang, WANG Wei, LEI Tingwu, et al. Impact of regulated deficit irrigation on growth and fruit yield of mature fragrant pear trees under trickle irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(11):118-124.
[28]	强薇, 赵经华, 付秋萍, 等. 调亏灌溉对滴灌核桃树生长及产量的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(8):186-190.
	QIANG Wei, ZHAO Jinghua, FU Qiuping, et al. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on growth and yield of walnut trees under drip irrigation[J]. Resources and Environment in Arid Areas, 2018, 32(8):186-190.
[29]	钟韵, 费良军, 曾健, 等. 根域水分亏缺对涌泉灌苹果幼树产量品质和节水的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(21):78-87.
	ZHONG Yun, FEI Liangjun, ZENG Jian, et al. Effects of root-zone water deficit on yield, quality and water use efficiency of young apple trees under surge-root irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(21):78-87.
[30]	Riccardo G, Giovanni C, Clizia G, et al. Fruit growth, yield and oil quality changes induced by deficit irrigation at different stages of olive fruit development[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212:88-98. DOI

调亏灌溉对滴灌核桃树土壤温度及产量的影响

Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Soil Temperature and Yield of Walnut Trees under Drip Irrigation

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[9]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[10]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[11]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[12]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[13]	张永强, 陈传信, 聂石辉, 徐其江, 赛力汗·赛, 雷钧杰. 矮壮素滴施时期对冬小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力的调控分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878.
[14]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[15]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.