氟啶虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫捕食功能反应的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.012

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (10): 1860-1867.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.012

氟啶虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫捕食功能反应的影响

魏引弟(), 马雪, 韩旭, 麻正辉, 张笑丽, 姚永生(), 熊仁次()

塔里木大学植物科学学院/南疆农业有害生物综合治理兵团重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300

收稿日期:2021-03-15 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-10-26
通信作者: 姚永生,熊仁次
作者简介:魏引弟(2000-),女,新疆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为害虫综合治理,(E-mail) 2802770619@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0201900);棉花生物学国家重点实验室开放课题(CB2020A20);大学生创新创业训练计划(202010757012);大学生创新创业训练计划(202110757021)

Effects on Predation Response of Coccinella undecimpunctata Fed on Aphis gossypii Treated with Sublethal Doses of Flonicamid

Yindi WEI(), Xue MA, Xu HAN, Zhenghui MA, Xiaoli ZHANG, Yongsheng YAO(), Renci XIONG()

Key Laboratory for Agricultural IPM in Southern Xinjiang / College of Plant Science, Tarim University, Alar Xinjiang 843300, China

Received:2021-03-15 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-26
Correspondence author: Yongsheng YAO, Renci XIONG
Supported by:
National Key R & D Program Project(2017YFD0201900);State Key Laboratory Project for Cotton Biology(CB2020A20);Innovative Training Program Project for College Students(202010757012);Innovative Training Program Project for College Students(202110757021)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究氟啶虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫捕食功能反应的影响,为合理使用杀虫剂和协同生物防治防控棉蚜提供科学依据。【方法】测定氟啶虫酰胺对棉蚜的毒力,以供试药剂的LC₂₅、LC₅₀为处理浓度,采用浸叶法处理棉蚜,选取活体棉蚜作为十一星瓢虫的食物,分析对其捕食功能反应的影响。【结果】饲喂氟啶虫酰胺不同亚致死浓度处理棉蚜后,十一星瓢虫捕食功能反应等参数及寻找效应均有一定影响,且随药剂浓度增加,对其捕食能力影响越大。饲喂氟啶虫酰胺LC₅₀处理的棉蚜后,十一星瓢虫日捕食量及搜寻能力显著降低,与对照相比,十一星瓢虫1、2、3、4龄幼虫和成虫的瞬时攻击率分别下降0.38%、7.18%、2.19%、16.83%、1.41%,处理一头棉蚜所用的时间分别延长0.002 4 d、0.001 6 d、0.000 6 d、0.000 5 d、0.000 1 d,日最大捕食量分别下降0.72、2.52、7.76、7.01、1.17头/皿。【结论】饲喂氟啶虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫1~4龄幼虫及成虫的瞬时攻击率降低,处理棉蚜所用时间延长,日最大捕食量下降。其中饲喂氟啶虫酰胺LC₅₀处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫各虫态捕食功能有显著影响。

关键词: 十一星瓢虫; 氟啶虫酰胺; 亚致死浓度; 棉蚜; 捕食功能

Abstract:

【Objective】 To provide a scientific basis for the rational use of pesticides and the cooperative biological control of Aphis gossypii by studying the effects on predation response of Coccinella undecimpunctata feeding on A. gossypii treated with sublethal doses of flonicamid. 【Methods】 According to the results of toxicity determination of LC₂₅ and LC₅₀ of flonicamid on A. gossypii, the influence of predation response of C. undecimpunctata feeding on A. gossypii treated with sublethal doses by the leaf soaking method were determined. 【Results】 The results showed that A. gossypii treated with flonicamid of different concentrations had certain influence on the predation function response and search effect of C. undecimpunctata, and with the increase of the concentration of the insecticides, the effect on the predation ability was greater. Especially after feeding A. gossypii treated with flonicamid LC₅₀, the daily maximum consumption and searching ability of C. undecimpunctata were significantly lower than that of CK, C. undecimpunctata‘s 1, 2, 3, 4 instars and adult instantaneous attack rate fell by 0.38%, 7.18%, 2.19%, 16.83% and 1.41%, the handling times required for a head of A. gossypii were extended the 0.002,4 d, 0.001,6 d, 0.000,6 d, 0.000,5 d and 0.000,1 d. The daily maximum consumption decreased by 0.72, 2.52, 7.76, 7.01 and 1.17 heads/dish, respectively. 【Conclusion】 The instantaneous attack rates of C. undecimpunctata of 1-4 instar larva and adult fed on A. gossypii treated with sublethal doses of flonicamid were reduced, the handling time was prolonged to certain degree, and the daily maximum predation amount decreased. Among them, A. gossypii treated with flonicamid LC₅₀ had the most obvious effect on the individual state of C. undecimpunctata.

Key words: Coccinella undecimpunctata; flonicamid; sublethal concentration; Aphis gossypii; predation response

中图分类号:

S476

魏引弟, 马雪, 韩旭, 麻正辉, 张笑丽, 姚永生, 熊仁次. 氟啶虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫捕食功能反应的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1860-1867.

Yindi WEI, Xue MA, Xu HAN, Zhenghui MA, Xiaoli ZHANG, Yongsheng YAO, Renci XIONG. Effects on Predation Response of Coccinella undecimpunctata Fed on Aphis gossypii Treated with Sublethal Doses of Flonicamid[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1860-1867.

图/表 4

参考文献 26

[1]	帕提玛·乌木尔汗, 郭佩佩, 马少军, 等. 新疆地区棉蚜田间种群对10种杀虫剂的抗性[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6):273-278.
	Patima Wumuerhan, GUO Peipei, MA Shaojun, et al. Resistance of different field populations of Aphis gossypii to ten insecticides in Xinjiang[J]. Plant Protection, 2019, 45(6):273-278.
[2]	热依汗古丽·阿布都热合曼, 艾合买提·吾斯曼, 魏新政, 等. 2019年新疆棉花主要病虫害发生概况[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(11):7-9.
	Reyihanguli Abudoureheman, Aihemaiti Wusiman, WEI Xinzheng, et al. Overview of main cotton diseases and insect pests in Xinjiang in 2019[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(11):7-9.
[3]	时英爽, 高有华, 蔡超, 等. 新疆棉田吡虫啉残留动态及其防治棉蚜田间用药量确定[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(10):25-29, 37.
	SHI Yingshuang, GAO Youhua, CAI Chao, et al. Imidacloprid residue dynamics in the cotton field of Xinjiang and determination of its dosage for Aphis gossypii[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(10):25-29, 37.
[4]	姚永生. 新疆南部棉区棉蚜与棉长管蚜种间关系的格局变化及影响因素分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017.
	YAO Yongsheng. Interspecific pattern change of Aphis gossypii and Acyrthosiphon gossypii and its' influencing factors in Southern Xinjiang cotton growing region[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2017.
[5]	丁建朋, 韩英, 韩旭, 等. 棉蚜和棉长管蚜对3种杀虫剂的敏感性比较[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(6):270-275.
	DING Jianpeng, HAN Ying, HAN Xu, et al. Sensitivity of Aphis gossypii and Acyrthosiphon gossypii to three insecticides[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(6):270-275.
[6]	王伟, 姚举, 李号宾. 棉田三种瓢虫对棉蚜的捕食功能反应[J]. 中国生物防治, 2008, 24(S1):15-20.
	WANG Wei, YAO Ju, LI Haobin. Functional responses of three ladybugs to Aphis gossypii in cotton field[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2008, 24(S1):15-20.
[7]	曹巍, 苏悦, 马雪, 等. 十一星瓢虫对棉蚜和棉长管蚜的捕食选择性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3):472-480.
	CAO Wei, SU Yue, MA Xue, et al. Prey selectivity of Coccinella undecimpunctata on Aphis gossypii and Acyrthosiphon gossypii[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(3):472-480.
[8]	李秋荣, 祁全梅, 来有鹏. 十一星瓢虫对枸杞棉蚜的捕食作用研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(6):1472-1481.
	LI Qiurong, QI Quanmei, LAI Youpeng. Study on predation of Coccinella undecimpunctata Linnaeus on Aphis gossypii Glover[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(6):1472-1481.
[9]	Nuria Morfin, Paul H. Goodwin, Ernesto Guzman-Novoa. Interaction of Varroa destructor and sublethal clothianidin doses during the larval stage on subsequent adult honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) health, cellular immunity, deformed wing virus levels and differential gene expression[J]. Microorganisms, 2020, 8:858. DOI URL
[10]	Paulo José Balsamo, Caio Eduardo da Costa Domingues, Elaine Cristina Mathias da Silva-Zacarin, et al. Impact of sublethal doses of thiamethoxam and Nosema ceranae inoculation on the hepato-nephrocitic system in young Africanized Apis mellifera[J]. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2020, 59(4):350-361. DOI
[11]	彭建红, 李耀发, 高占林, 等. 新烟碱类杀虫剂亚致死剂量对麦长管蚜和棉蚜取食行为的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4):91-96.
	PENG Jianhong, LI Yaofa, GAO Zhanlin, et al. Effects of the sublethal dose of neonicotinoid insecticides on the feeding behavior of Sitobion miscanthi and Aphis gossypii[J]. Plant Protection, 2019, 45(4):91-96.
[12]	YANG Xiaoxia, GONG Jiuping, ZHANG Xuemei, et al. The responses of the growth, cytochrome P450 isoenzymes activities and the metabolomics in earthworms to sublethal doses of dichlorvos in soil[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 207(1):111547. DOI URL
[13]	Ashfaq A S, Jay F B. Lethal and sublethal effects of an insect growth regulator, pyriproxyfen, on obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2010, 103(2):340-347. PMID
[14]	杨琼. 温室大棚蔬菜害虫和天敌发生动态及药剂对主要害虫天敌的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014.
	YANG Qiong. Dynamics of pests and natural enemies in greenhouse vegetables and effects of pesticides on natural enemies of main pests[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014.
[15]	杨国庆, 陆珍珍, 高鑫, 等. 环氧虫啶对灰飞虱种群增长和拟水狼蛛捕食功能的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(6):65-69,74.
	YANG Guoqing, LU Zhenzhen, GAO Xin, et al. Effects of cycloxaprid on the population growth of Laodelphax striatellus and the predatory capacity of Pirata subpiraticus[J]. Plant Protection, 2014, 40(6):65-69,74.
[16]	张傲雪. 绿色防控技术对稻飞虱和天敌的影响及亚致死剂量吡蚜酮对黑肩绿盲蝽的评价[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2019.
	ZHANG Aoxue. Effects of green control techniques on rice planthopper and its natural enemies and evaluation of sublethal dose of pymetrozine on Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2019.
[17]	王峰巍, 王甦, 张帆, 等. 不同温度对经吡虫啉处理的异色瓢虫捕食能力的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2010, 32(4):504-509.
	WANG Fengwei, WANG Su, ZHANG Fan, et al. Influence of imidacloprid on predatory capacity of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) under different temperatures[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2010, 32(4):504-509.
[18]	王佳佳, 付雪, 王雪, 等. 吡虫啉对异色瓢虫种群控害功能的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(5):1088-1097.
	WANG Jiajia, FU Xue, WANG Xue, et al. Effect of imidacloprid on Harmonia axyridis, a biological control for pest insects[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2019, 56(5):1088-1097.
[19]	袁伟宁, 陈威, 方圆, 等. 两种杀虫剂亚致死剂量对龟纹瓢虫捕食功能反应的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2015, 35(6):65-70.
	YUAN Weining, CHEN Wei, FANG Yuan, et al. Effects of sublethal doses of two insecticides on predation of Propylaea japonica[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2015, 35(6):65-70.
[20]	陈文胜, 崔志新, 刘丽屏, 等. 杀虫剂亚致死剂量对六斑月瓢虫捕食作用的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2008, 47(12):1445-1446,1450.
	CHEN Wensheng, CUI Zhixin, LIU Liping, et al. Effects of sublethal doses of insecticides on predation of Menochilus sexmaculatus[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 47(12):1445-1446,1450.
[21]	王小艺, 沈佐锐. 亚致死剂量杀虫剂对异色瓢虫捕食作用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(12):2278-2284.
	WANG Xiaoyi, SHEN Zuorui. Effects of sublethal doses of insecticides on predation of Harmonia axyridis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(12):2278-2284.
[22]	符振实, 唐思琼, 苏杰, 等. 三种杀虫(螨)剂对双尾新小绥螨捕食作用的影响[J/OL]. 中国生物防治学报, https://doi.org/10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.01.018.
	FU Zhenshi, TANG Siqiong, SU Jie, et al. Effect of three insecticides (acaricides) on predation function of Neoseiulus bicaudus[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, https://doi.org/10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.01.018.
[23]	邱良妙, 占志雄. 5种杀虫剂亚致死剂量对龟纹瓢虫捕食作用的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(10):1872-1876.
	QIU Liangmiao, ZHAN Zhixiong. Sublethal doses of five insecticides on predation of Propylaea japonica (Thunberg)[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012, 33(10):1872-1876.
[24]	李宜儒, 李琼, 胡昌雄, 等. 吡虫啉对南方小花蝽捕食西花蓟马功能反应的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报 (自然科学), 2019, 34(4):590-596.
	LI Yiru, LI Qiong, HU Changxiong, et al. Effect of imidacloprid concentrations on predatory functional responses of Orius similis to Frankliniella occidentalis[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2019, 34(4):590-596.
[25]	杨巧燕, 陈威, 孙小玲, 等. 多异瓢虫捕食豌豆蚜功能对3种杀虫剂亚致死剂量的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(7):1418-1425.
	YANG Qiaoyan, CHEN Wei, SUN Xiaoling, et al. Response of the functional of Hippodamia variegate preying on pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum to sublethal doses of 3 insecticides[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(7):1418-1425.
[26]	陈威. 三种杀虫剂对多异瓢虫亚致死效应的研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2013.
	CHEN Wei. Sublethal effects of three insecticides on Harmonia axyridis[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2013.

虫态 Stage	猎物密度 Prey density	处理 Pesticide
虫态 Stage	猎物密度 Prey density	CK	F LC₂₅	F LC₅₀
1龄幼虫 1st instar	5	2.80±0.20^a	2.80±0.20^a	2.80±0.20^a
	10	5.20±0.20^a	5.00±0.24^ab	4.80±0.20^ab
	15	6.80±0.37^a	6.60±0.40^a	6.80±0.24^a
	20	7.60±0.24^a	7.40±0.24^a	7.60±0.20^a
	25	7.80±0.20^a	7.60±0.24^a	7.80±0.24^a
2龄幼虫 2nd instar	10	6.20±0.20^a	5.80±0.20^ab	5.60±0.24^abc
	20	10.40±0.51^a	10.00±0.32^a	9.60±0.24^ab
	30	14.20±0.58^a	13.80±0.58^a	13.20±0.73^ab
	40	17.80±0.37^a	16.80±0.49^ab	15.80±0.37^bc
	50	19.00±0.32^a	17.80±0.20^ab	17.40±0.40^bc
3龄幼虫 3rd instar	30	15.60±0.24^a	15.20±0.20^a	15.00±0.20^a
	60	26.80±0.37^a	26.00±0.55^a	25.40±0.24^a
	90	35.00±0.32^a	34.20±0.58^ab	33.20±0.20^b
	120	46.00±0.32^a	45.00±0.32^a	44.60±0.24^a
	150	53.00±0.32^a	51.80±0.58^ab	50.40±0.51^b
4龄幼虫 4th instar	50	33.40±0.51^a	32.20±0.37^a	27.80±0.20^b
	90	43.00±0.45^a	41.00±0.32^b	37.80±0.20^c
	130	52.00±0.55^a	49.40±0.40^b	45.20±0.20^c
	170	69.00±0.32^a	66.20±0.37^b	59.20±0.37^c
	210	90.00±0.55^a	89.20±0.58^a	80.00±1.10^b
成虫 Adult	50	29.00±0.32^a	28.60±0.24^a	28.40±0.24^a
	90	40.60±0.24^a	40.20±0.20^a	40.20±0.20^a
	130	45.00±0.71^a	45.00±0.32^a	44.60±0.75^a
	170	62.80±0.37^a	61.00±0.84^ab	60.00±0.71^b
	210	75.00±0.32^a	74.80±0.37^a	74.40±0.24^a

虫态 Stage	猎物密度 Prey density	处理 Pesticide
虫态 Stage	猎物密度 Prey density	CK	F LC₂₅	F LC₅₀
1龄幼虫 1st instar	5	2.80±0.20^a	2.80±0.20^a	2.80±0.20^a
	10	5.20±0.20^a	5.00±0.24^ab	4.80±0.20^ab
	15	6.80±0.37^a	6.60±0.40^a	6.80±0.24^a
	20	7.60±0.24^a	7.40±0.24^a	7.60±0.20^a
	25	7.80±0.20^a	7.60±0.24^a	7.80±0.24^a
2龄幼虫 2nd instar	10	6.20±0.20^a	5.80±0.20^ab	5.60±0.24^abc
	20	10.40±0.51^a	10.00±0.32^a	9.60±0.24^ab
	30	14.20±0.58^a	13.80±0.58^a	13.20±0.73^ab
	40	17.80±0.37^a	16.80±0.49^ab	15.80±0.37^bc
	50	19.00±0.32^a	17.80±0.20^ab	17.40±0.40^bc
3龄幼虫 3rd instar	30	15.60±0.24^a	15.20±0.20^a	15.00±0.20^a
	60	26.80±0.37^a	26.00±0.55^a	25.40±0.24^a
	90	35.00±0.32^a	34.20±0.58^ab	33.20±0.20^b
	120	46.00±0.32^a	45.00±0.32^a	44.60±0.24^a
	150	53.00±0.32^a	51.80±0.58^ab	50.40±0.51^b
4龄幼虫 4th instar	50	33.40±0.51^a	32.20±0.37^a	27.80±0.20^b
	90	43.00±0.45^a	41.00±0.32^b	37.80±0.20^c
	130	52.00±0.55^a	49.40±0.40^b	45.20±0.20^c
	170	69.00±0.32^a	66.20±0.37^b	59.20±0.37^c
	210	90.00±0.55^a	89.20±0.58^a	80.00±1.10^b
成虫 Adult	50	29.00±0.32^a	28.60±0.24^a	28.40±0.24^a
	90	40.60±0.24^a	40.20±0.20^a	40.20±0.20^a
	130	45.00±0.71^a	45.00±0.32^a	44.60±0.75^a
	170	62.80±0.37^a	61.00±0.84^ab	60.00±0.71^b
	210	75.00±0.32^a	74.80±0.37^a	74.40±0.24^a

剂量 Dose	虫态 Stage	Holling-II圆盘方程 Holling-II equation	相关系数 Relate coefficient	瞬时攻击率 Instantaneous attack rate (α)	处理时间 (d) Handling time (T_h)	日最大捕食量 (head) Maximum consumption (Na_max)
CK	1龄幼虫	Na=0.678 1N/(1+0.038 4N)	0.989 4	0.678 1	0.056 6	17.67
LC₂₅		Na=0.688 1N/(1+0.042 9N)	0.992 8	0.688 1	0.062 3	16.05
LC₅₀		Na=0.674 3N/(1+0.039 8N)	0.994 1	0.674 3	0.059 0	16.95
CK	2龄幼虫	Na=0.725 7N/(1+0.017 7N)	0.997 9	0.725 7	0.024 4	40.98
LC₂₅		Na=0.673 3N/(1+0.016 3N)	0.998 7	0.024 5	0.675 0	40.82
LC₅₀		Na=0.653 9N/(1+0.017 0N)	0.999 4	0.653 9	0.026 0	38.46
CK	3龄幼虫	Na=0.594 8N/(1+0.005 1N)	0.996 9	0.594 8	0.008 5	117.65
LC₂₅		Na=0.578 3N/(1+0.005 0N)	0.996 7	0.578 3	0.008 7	114.94
LC₅₀		Na=0.572 9N/(1+0.005 2N)	0.995 3	0.572 9	0.009 1	109.89
CK	4龄幼虫	Na=0.868 1N/(1+0.007 1N)	0.916 1	0.868 1	0.008 2	121.95
LC₂₅		Na=0.832 3N/(1+0.007 1N)	0.900 2	0.832 3	0.008 5	117.65
LC₅₀		Na=0.699 8N/(1+0.006 1N)	0.938 4	0.699 8	0.008 7	114.94
CK	成虫	Na=0.763 2N/(1+0.007 0N)	0.943 0	0.763 2	0.009 2	108.70
LC₂₅		Na=0.751 3N/(1+0.006 9N)	0.949 0	0.751 3	0.009 2	108.70
LC₅₀		Na=0.749 1N/(1+0.007 0N)	0.949 0	0.749 1	0.009 3	107.53

剂量 Dose	虫态 Stage	Holling-II圆盘方程 Holling-II equation	相关系数 Relate coefficient	瞬时攻击率 Instantaneous attack rate (α)	处理时间 (d) Handling time (T_h)	日最大捕食量 (head) Maximum consumption (Na_max)
CK	1龄幼虫	Na=0.678 1N/(1+0.038 4N)	0.989 4	0.678 1	0.056 6	17.67
LC₂₅		Na=0.688 1N/(1+0.042 9N)	0.992 8	0.688 1	0.062 3	16.05
LC₅₀		Na=0.674 3N/(1+0.039 8N)	0.994 1	0.674 3	0.059 0	16.95
CK	2龄幼虫	Na=0.725 7N/(1+0.017 7N)	0.997 9	0.725 7	0.024 4	40.98
LC₂₅		Na=0.673 3N/(1+0.016 3N)	0.998 7	0.024 5	0.675 0	40.82
LC₅₀		Na=0.653 9N/(1+0.017 0N)	0.999 4	0.653 9	0.026 0	38.46
CK	3龄幼虫	Na=0.594 8N/(1+0.005 1N)	0.996 9	0.594 8	0.008 5	117.65
LC₂₅		Na=0.578 3N/(1+0.005 0N)	0.996 7	0.578 3	0.008 7	114.94
LC₅₀		Na=0.572 9N/(1+0.005 2N)	0.995 3	0.572 9	0.009 1	109.89
CK	4龄幼虫	Na=0.868 1N/(1+0.007 1N)	0.916 1	0.868 1	0.008 2	121.95
LC₂₅		Na=0.832 3N/(1+0.007 1N)	0.900 2	0.832 3	0.008 5	117.65
LC₅₀		Na=0.699 8N/(1+0.006 1N)	0.938 4	0.699 8	0.008 7	114.94
CK	成虫	Na=0.763 2N/(1+0.007 0N)	0.943 0	0.763 2	0.009 2	108.70
LC₂₅		Na=0.751 3N/(1+0.006 9N)	0.949 0	0.751 3	0.009 2	108.70
LC₅₀		Na=0.749 1N/(1+0.007 0N)	0.949 0	0.749 1	0.009 3	107.53

剂量 Dose	虫态 Stage	寻找效应方程 Search effect equation	相关系数(R) Relate coefficient
CK	1龄幼虫	S=0.678 1/(1+0.038 4N)	0.989 4
LC₂₅		S=0.688 1/(1+0.042 9N)	0.992 8
LC₅₀		S=0.674 3/(1+0.039 8N)	0.994 1
CK	2龄幼虫	S=0.725 7/(1+0.017 7N)	0.997 9
LC₂₅		S=0.673 3/(1+0.016 3N)	0.998 9
LC₅₀		S=0.653 9/(1+0.017 0N)	0.999 4
CK	3龄幼	S=0.594 8/(1+0.005 1N)	0.996 9
LC₂₅		S=0.578 3/(1+0.005 0N)	0.996 7
LC₅₀		S=0.572 9/(1+0.005 2N)	0.995 3
CK	4龄幼	S=0.868 1/(1+0.007 1N)	0.916 1
LC₂₅		S=0.832 3/(1+0.007 1N)	0.900 2
LC₅₀		S=0.699 8/(1+0.006 1N)	0.938 4
CK	成虫	S=0.763 2/(1+0.007 0N)	0.943 0
LC₂₅		S=0.751 3/(1+0.006 9N)	0.949 0
LC₅₀		S=0.749 1/(1+0.007 0N)	0.949 0

氟啶虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理棉蚜对十一星瓢虫捕食功能反应的影响

Effects on Predation Response of Coccinella undecimpunctata Fed on Aphis gossypii Treated with Sublethal Doses of Flonicamid

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	文霞, 田立超, 高桂珍. 四斑月瓢虫对紫薇长斑蚜的捕食功能反应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2266-2272.
[2]	薛正轩, 蔡志平, 张智健, 彭天祥, 黄志伟, 黄恩泽, 王佩玲, 陆宴辉. 基于铷元素标记技术分析多异瓢虫在甘草带与棉田间的迁移范围[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1741-1747.
[3]	李耀发, 安静杰, 窦亚楠, 孙小诺, 张谦, 柳春红, 党志红, 高占林. 播期对黄河流域棉花苗蚜种群动态和棉花产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2496-2500.
[4]	王小丽, 韩睿, 张全成, 赵鹏程, 王俊刚. 不同地理种群棉蚜三种关键性酶活差异及其与抗性相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 2007-2013.
[5]	李艳兵, 郭小虎, 努尔什瓦克·阿达力别克, 帕提玛·乌木尔汗, 马德英. 人工助迁多异瓢虫和化防2种模式对棉蚜的防效及天敌种群动态影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1173-1179.
[6]	陈文静, 赵静, 张金磊, 鲁立良, 冯丽凯. 噻虫嗪在棉叶中残留消解动态及对棉蚜的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1678-1684.
[7]	麻正辉, 苏悦, 马雪, 羊河, 侯国辉, 陈柄润, 韩旭, 姚永生. 噻虫嗪种子包衣棉花对棉蚜和棉长管蚜解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1685-1693.
[8]	张谦, 王燕, 黄山松, 董明, 冯国艺, 王永强, 刘旭, 梁青龙, 林永增, 祁虹, 王树林. 增效剂对常用烟碱类杀虫剂防治棉蚜的减量增效作用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1435-1440.
[9]	安静杰, 高占林, 党志红, 郭江龙, 柳春红, 李耀发. 棉蚜有翅成蚜对不同波段光谱的选择性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1441-1446.
[10]	闫虹江, 李维政, 梁赫, 宁忠雄, 路伟. 3种新烟碱类杀虫剂对棉蚜的室内毒力测定及田间药效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1454-1459.
[11]	李娜, 刘冰, 陆宴辉. 氟啶虫胺腈对新疆棉田棉蚜及其天敌种群的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2062-2068.
[12]	刘佳美, 刘冰, 王佩玲, 陆宴辉. 植物源杀虫剂对棉蚜毒力及多异瓢虫的安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2069-2076.
[13]	李志雄, 魏引弟, 苏悦, 陈柄润, 侯国辉, 闻慧, 姚永生, 陈婧. 3种杀虫剂亚致死剂量对棉蚜和棉长管蚜生长与繁殖的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1851-1859.
[14]	方涛, 张军高, 樊国全, 陈勇, 梁晶, 李进, 周小云, 王莉, 郑瑞明, 鄢蓉, 雷斌. 28种植物提取物对棉蚜的杀虫活性测定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1868-1875.
[15]	李国英, 焦瑞莲, 任毓忠, 张莉, 武刚, 刘政. 新疆棉田僵铃和裂铃发生原因分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9): 1724-1733.