深松对叶丛生长期甜菜形态结构特性及生物量积累特性的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.010

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (10): 2421-2430.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.010

• 作物遗传育种·耕作栽培·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

深松对叶丛生长期甜菜形态结构特性及生物量积累特性的影响

阿不都卡地尔·库尔班¹, 陈友强¹, 刘华君¹(), 潘竟海¹, 李小惠², 林明¹, 鲁伟丹¹, 白晓山¹, 董心久¹, 李思忠¹

1.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.伽师奥都农业有限公司,新疆伽师 844300

收稿日期:2021-12-11 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-12-21
通信作者: 刘华君
作者简介:阿不都卡地尔·库尔班(1992-),男,新疆阿图什人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为甜菜高产高效栽培,(E-mail)xjndkadier@126.com
基金资助:
国家糖料产业技术体系南疆综合试验站项目(CARS-170705);新疆农业科学院青年科技骨干创新能力培养项目(xjnkq-2020014);新疆农科院经济作物研究所青年科技骨干培养项目(JZRC2019Q05);新疆维吾尔自治区区域协同科技援疆计划项目(2021E02026);新疆维吾尔自治区乡村振兴产业发展科技行动项目(2021NC004);喀什地区科技计划项目-甜菜高产高糖抗逆品种引进筛选及应用推广

Effects of Subsoiling on the Characteristics of Morphological Structure and Biomass Accumulation of Sugar Beet in Long-term Leaf Cluster

Abdukadier Kurban¹, CHEN Yongqiang¹, LIU Huajun¹(), PAN Jinghai¹, LI Xiaohui², LIN Ming¹, LU Weidan¹, BAI Xiaoshan¹, DONG Xinjiu¹, LI Sizhong¹

1. Research Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. Jiashi Aodu Agriculture limited company, Xinjiang Jiashi, 844300, China

Received:2021-12-11 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-12-21
Correspondence author: LIU Huajun
Supported by:
South Xinjiang Comprehensive Test Station Project of National Sugar Industry Technology System(CARS-170705);Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Youth Science and Technology Backbone Innovation Capacity Training Project(xjnkq-2020014);Youth Science and Technology Backbone Training Project of Economic Crops Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(JZRC2019Q05);Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Regional Cooperative Science and Technology Assistance Plan Project(2021E02026);Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Rural Revitalization Industry Development Science and Technology Action Project(2021NC004);Kashi Science and Technology Plan Project - Introduction, screening, application and promotion of high-yield, high sugar and stress resistant sugarbeet varieties

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究深松深度对新疆南疆甜菜叶丛生长期植株形态结构及生物量积累影响,为新疆南疆甜菜田合理耕作层的构建提供依据。【方法】采用大田随机区组试验设计,设置4个处理,深松深度分别为35 cm(S₃₅)、45 cm(S₄₅)、55 cm(S₅₅)处理,未作深松处理作对照(CK),研究不同深松深度对甜菜叶丛生长期植株形态结构特性、各器官生物量积累的影响,分析叶片、叶柄形态结构特性与块根形态指标的相关性。【结果】甜菜叶丛生长期叶片长、叶片宽、叶片鲜重、叶柄长、叶柄粗及叶柄鲜重均随叶序的增加呈先增后降的趋势,其中L₅叶片出现最大值,可作为功能叶,且深松深度为55 cm促进甜菜叶丛生长期功能叶片和叶柄的生长。深松55 cm与对照(CK)相比,甜菜叶丛期块根长、块根直径、块根围及块根鲜重显著(P<0.05)增加了25.93%、25.59%、30.15%、19.19%,使单株总鲜重和叶片鲜重比例分别增加了29.99%、9.96%,降低甜菜块根鲜重比例和根冠比8.35%、14.29%。【结论】在新疆南疆深松深度为55 cm能有效促进甜菜叶丛生长期叶片生长,增加甜菜叶片生物量(源)的积累。

关键词: 甜菜; 深松深度; 叶丛期; 形态结构; 生物量积累

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of subsoiling depth on the plant morphological structure and biomass accumulation of sugar beet during the growth period in southern Xinjiang, so as to provide a basis for the construction of reasonable tillage layer of sugar beet field in southern Xinjiang. 【Method】 A field randomized block design was used in this study and four subsoiling treatments were set: 35 cm (S₃₅), 45 cm (S₄₅) and 55 cm (S₅₅) to study the effects of different subsoiling depths on plant morphological structure characteristics, biomass accumulation of various organs, and the correlation between morphological structure characteristics of leaves and petioles and morphological indexes of root tubers. 【Results】 The leaf length, leaf width, leaf fresh weight, petiole length, petiole diameter and petiole fresh weight increased first and then decreased with the increase of leaf order during the growth period of beet leaf cluster, among which, the maximum value of L₅ leaf appeared, which could be used as functional leaf and the subsoiling depth of 55 cm promoted the growth of long-term functional leaf and petiole of beet leaf cluster. Compared with CK, the root length, root diameter, root girth and fresh weight of root increased by 25.93%, 25.59%, 30.15% and 19.19%, respectively (P< 0.05), and the ratio of total fresh weight per plant and leaf fresh weight increased by 29.99% and 9.96%, respectively, while the ratio of root fresh weight and root shoot ratio decreased by 8.35% and 14.29%.【Conclusion】 Subsoiling depth of 55 cm in southern Xinjiang can effectively promote the growth of sugar beet leaves.

Key words: sugar beet; subsoiling depth; leaf cluster stage; morphological structure; biomass accumulation

中图分类号:

S566·1

阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 陈友强, 刘华君, 潘竟海, 李小惠, 林明, 鲁伟丹, 白晓山, 董心久, 李思忠. 深松对叶丛生长期甜菜形态结构特性及生物量积累特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2421-2430.

Abdukadier Kurban, CHEN Yongqiang, LIU Huajun, PAN Jinghai, LI Xiaohui, LIN Ming, LU Weidan, BAI Xiaoshan, DONG Xinjiu, LI Sizhong. Effects of Subsoiling on the Characteristics of Morphological Structure and Biomass Accumulation of Sugar Beet in Long-term Leaf Cluster[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2421-2430.

图/表 6

参考文献 40

[1]	史应武, 娄恺, 李春. 内生真菌对甜菜主要农艺性状及氮糖代谢关键酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(5):946-953.
	SHI Yingwu, LOU Kai, LI Chun. Effects of Endophytic Fungi on Main Agronomic Characters and key enzyme activities of nitrogen and sugar metabolism in Sugar beet[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35 (5): 946-953. DOI URL
[2]	王荣华, 王维成, 刘珣, 等. 关于新疆甜菜产业发展的调研报告[J]. 中国糖料, 2014,(4):86-89.
	WANG Ronghua, WANG Weicheng, LIU Yu, et al. Research Report on the development of beet industry in Xinjiang[J]. China Sugar, 2014,(4): 86-89.
[3]	王燕飞, 李翠芳, 李承业, 等. 我国甜菜栽培模式研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2011,(1):55-57.
	WANG Ronghua, WANG Weicheng, LIU Yu, et al. Research Report on the development of beet industry in Xinjiang[J]. China Sugar, 2011,(1):55-57.
[4]	王亮, 郭仁松, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 等. 深松深度对南疆滴灌棉田水分利用效率与产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(20):144-152.
	WANG Liang, GUO Rensong, Wumaierjiang Kuerban, et al. Effect of subsoiling depth on water use efficiency and yield of drip irrigated cotton field in southern Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(20): 144-152.
[5]	Bai W, Sun Z X, Zheng J M, et al. The combination of subsoil and the incorporation of corn stover affect physicochemical properties of soil and corn yield in semi-arid China[J]. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 98(5/6): 561-570.
[6]	高建胜, 董国豪, 郭建军, 等. 耕层厚度对冬小麦农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(8):54-57.
	GAO Jiansheng, DONG Guohao, GUO Jianjun, et al. Effects of plough layer thickness on Agronomic Traits and yield of winter wheat[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 50 (8): 54-57.
[7]	朱文慧, 张鲜花, 朱进忠. 海拔梯度对新疆梯牧草植株形态学特征的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3):754-762.
	ZHU Wenhui, ZHANG Huahua, ZHU Jinzhong. Effect of altitude gradient on morphological characteristics of echelon grass in Xinjiang[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 754-762.
[8]	Shao Y H, Xie Y X, Wang C Y, et al. Effects of different soil conservation tillage approaches on soil nutrients, water use and wheat-maize yield in rain fed dry-land regions of North China[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016, 81: 37-45. DOI URL
[9]	Wang S B, Guo L L, Han H F, et al. Effect of subsoiling depth on soil physical properties and summer maize (Zeamays L.) yield[J]. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2019, 65(3):131-137. DOI URL
[10]	张黛静, 张艳艳, 王艳杰, 等. 耕层调控与有机肥处理下麦田土壤和小麦冠层结构特性及其相互关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(2):538-546. DOI
	ZHANG Daijing, ZHANG Yanyan, WANG Yanjie, et al. Soil and wheat canopy structure characteristics and their relationship under plough layer regulation and organic fertilizer treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(2): 538-546. DOI
[11]	孙利军, 张仁陟, 黄高宝. 保护性耕作对黄土高原旱地地表土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007, 25(6):207-211.
	SUN Lijun, ZHANG Renzhi, HUANG gaobao. Effects of conservation tillage on physical and chemical properties of Dryland Soil in Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2007, 25(6): 207-211.
[12]	张海林, 高旺盛, 陈阜, 等. 保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2005, 10(1):16-20.
	ZHANG Hailin, GAO exuberant, CHEN Fu, et al. Research status, development trend and Countermeasures of conservation tillage[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2005, 10(1): 16-20.
[13]	白伟, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 等. 耕层土壤虚实结构优化春玉米根系形态提高水分利用效率[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(21):88-97.
	BAI Wei, SUN Zhanxiang, ZHENG Jiaming, et al. Furrow loose and ridge compaction plough layer structure optimizing root morphology of spring maize and improving its water use efficiency[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(21): 88-97.
[14]	Sun X F, Ding Z S, Zhao M, et al. Sub-soiling practices change root distribution and increase post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and yield in summer maize[J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(4): e0174952. DOI URL
[15]	郭护团, 李君, 王庥林, 等. 黄土高原甜菜叶片生长特性及其对块根产量、含糖量的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2002,(5):1203-1208.
	GUO Hutuan, LI Jun, WANG Xilin, et al. Leaf growth characteristics of Sugarbeet and their effects on root tuber yield and sugar content in Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2002,(5): 1203-1208.
[16]	潘竟海, 张恒, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 等. 矮壮素对甜菜糖分积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8):1411-1420. DOI
	PAN Jinghai, ZHANG Heng, Abdukadier Kurban, et al. Effect of chlormequat on sugar accumulation and yield formation of Sugarbeet[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(8): 1411-1420. DOI
[17]	赵亚丽, 薛志伟, 郭海斌, 等. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47 (17): 3359-3371.
	ZHAO Yali, XUE Zhiwei, GUO Haibin, et al. Effects of tillage methods and straw returning on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of winter wheat summer maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47 (17): 3359-3371.
[18]	史振声, 付景昌, 朱敏, 等. 耕层和土壤质量是玉米大幅度、可持续增产的首要限制因子[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2013,(3):52-54.
	SHI Zhensheng, FU Jingchang, ZHU Min, et al. Plough layer and soil quality are the primary limiting factors for maize yield increase[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2013,(3): 52-54.
[19]	廖青, 韦广泼, 刘斌, 等. 机械化深耕深松栽培对甘蔗生长及产量的影响[J]. 广西农业科学, 2010, 41(6): 542-544.
	LIAO Qing, WEI Guangpo, LIU Bin, et al. Effects of mechanized deep tillage and subsoiling on growth and yield of sugarcane[J]. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 41(6): 542-544.
[20]	王崇桃, 李少昆. 玉米生产限制因素评估与技术优先序[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(6):1136-1146.
	WANG Chongtao, LI Shaokun. Assessment of limiting factors and techniques prioritization for maize production in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(6): 1136-1146.
[21]	Munkholm L J, Schjning P, Rasmussen KJ, Non-inversion tillage effects on soil mechanical properties of a humid sandy loam[J]. Soil and Tillage Rsearch, 2001, 62: 1-14.
[22]	罗锡文, 邵耀坚, 邱国庆, 等. 土壤深松技术在甘蔗生产中的应用[J]. 农业机械学报, 1997,(1):40-43.
	LUO Xiwen, SHAO Yaojian, QIU Guoqing, et al. Application of soil subsoiling technology in sugarcane production[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1997,(1): 40-43.
[23]	胡树平, 孟天天, 赵卉, 等. 深松对向日葵光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(1):116-120.
	HU Shuping, MENG Tiantian, ZHAO Hui, et al. Effects of subsoiling on photosynthetic performance and yield of sunflower[J]. Crops, 2019,(1): 116-120.
[24]	潘金华, 陈雯雯, 吕成文, 等. 条带深松对皖南旱地烤烟生长发育、SPAD值及经济性状的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2015, 42(23):54-58.
	PAN Jinhua, CHEN Wenwen, LV Chengwen, et al. Effects of strip subsoiling on growth, SPAD value and economic traits of flue-cured tobacco in Dryland of Southern Anhui[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 42(23): 54-58.
[25]	梁强, 谢金兰, 李毅杰, 等. 不同收获方式对蔗田土壤容重及甘蔗宿根出苗的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(7):1221-1224.
	LIANG Qiang, XIE Jinlan, LI Yijie, et al. Effects of Different Harvest Methods on soil bulk density and ratoon emergence of sugarcane[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2014, 45(7): 1221-1224.
[26]	廖青, 韦广泼, 陈桂芬, 等. 蔗叶还田对土壤微生物、理化性状及甘蔗生长的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(2):658-662.
	LIANG Qiang, XIE Jinlan, LI Yijie, et al. Effects of Different Harvest Methods on soil bulk density and ratoon emergence of sugarcane[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2011, 24(2):658-662.
[27]	任永哲, 徐艳花, 丁锦平, 等. 非生物因素调控植物根系发育可塑性的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9):34-38.
	REN Yongzhe, XU Yanhua, DING Jinping, et al. Research progress of abiotic factors regulating plant root development plasticity[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(9): 34-38.
[28]	翟振, 李玉义, 逄焕成, 等. 黄淮海北部农田犁底层现状及其特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49( 12) : 2322-2332.
	ZHAI Zhen, LI Yuyi, PANG Huancheng, et al. Present situation and characteristics of plow bottom in northern Huang Huai Hai[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(12): 2322-2332.
[29]	慕自新, 张岁岐, 郝文芳, 等. 玉米根系形态性状和空间分布对水分利用效率的调控[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(11):2895-2900.
	MU Zixin, ZHANG Suiqi, HAO Wenfang, et al. Regulation of root morphology and spatial distribution on water use efficiency of maize[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(11): 2895-2900.
[30]	孔凡磊, 陈阜, 张海林, 等. 轮耕对土壤物理性状和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(8): 150-155.
	KONG Fanlei, CHEN Fu, ZHANG Hailin, et al. Effects of rotation tillage on soil physical properties and winter wheat yield[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(8): 150-155.
[31]	齐华, 刘明, 张卫建, 等. 深松方式对土壤物理性状及玉米根系分布的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(4): 191-196. DOI
	QI Hua, LIU Ming, ZHANG Weijian, et al. Effects of subsoiling methods on soil physical properties and root distribution of maize[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012, 27(4): 191-196.
[32]	高中超, 宋柏权, 王翠玲, 等. 不同机械深耕的改土及促进作物生长和增产效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(12):79-86.
	GAO Zhongchao, SONG Baiquan, WANG Cuiling, et al. Effects of deep ploughing with different machines on soil improvement and crop growth and yield increase[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(12): 79-86.
[33]	Liu X, Zhang X, Chen S, et al. Subsoil compaction and irrigation regimes affect the root-shoot relation and grain yield of winter wheat[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2015,(154): 59-67.
[34]	杨青华, 高尔明, 马新明. 不同土壤类型对玉米根系干重变化及其分布的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2001,(5):238-240.
	YANG Qinghua, GAO Erming, MA Xinming. Effects of different soil types on dry weight change and distribution of maize roots[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2001,(5): 238-240.
[35]	郑毅, 张福锁. 土壤结构和耕作对根际微生态系统的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2003,(2):193-197.
	ZHENG Yi, ZHANG Fusuo. Effects of soil structure and tillage on rhizo-sphere microecosystem[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2003,(2): 193-197.
[36]	Cao H X, Liu Y, Liu Y X, et al. Biomass-based rice (Oryza sativa L.) aboveground architectural parameter models[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 11(10):1621-1632.. DOI URL
[37]	刘岩, 陆建飞, 曹宏鑫, 等. 基于生物量的水稻叶片主要几何属性模型研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(11): 4093-4099.
	LIU Yan, LU Jianfei, CAO Hongxin, et al. Main geometrical parameter models of rice blade based on biomass[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(11):4093-4099.
[38]	宋有洪, 郭焱, 李保国, 等. 基于器官生物量构建植株形态的玉米虚拟模型[J]. 生态学报, 2003, (12): 2579-2586.
	SONG Youhong, GUO Yan, LI Baoguo, et al. Reffye P. Virtual maize model: II.Plant morphological constructing based on organ biomass accumulation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003,(12): 2579-2586.
[39]	刘永霞, 岳延滨, 刘岩, 等. 不同品种和氮肥条件下水稻根系主要几何参数动态的量化研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(9):1782-1790.
	LIU Y X, YUE Y B, LIU Y, et al. Quantitative research of dynamic models of the main geometric parameters of rice root system of different varieties under different nitrogen conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(9): 1782-1790.
[40]	陈超, 潘学标, 张立祯, 等. 棉花地上部生长的功能—结构模型研究[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(12): 2237-2245. DOI
	CHEN Chao, PAN Xuebiao, ZHANG Lizheng, et al. Functional and structural model for above-ground growth in cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(12): 2237-2245. DOI

处理 treatment	块根长 Root length (cm)	块根直径 Root diameter (cm)	块根围 Root circumference (cm)	块根鲜重 Fresh weight of root (g)
S₅₅	14.23±0.70^a	5.30±0.33^a	18.00±1.15^a	164.23±10.72^a
S₄₅	13.33±0.87^a	4.88±0.24^ab	17.20±1.39^ab	156.27±11.96^ab
S₃₅	12.80±0.70^ab	4.51±0.36^bc	15.13±0.21^bc	147.63±9.69^ab
CK	11.30±0.92^b	4.22±0.33^c	13.83±1.76^c	137.87±9.36^b

处理 treatment	块根长 Root length (cm)	块根直径 Root diameter (cm)	块根围 Root circumference (cm)	块根鲜重 Fresh weight of root (g)
S₅₅	14.23±0.70^a	5.30±0.33^a	18.00±1.15^a	164.23±10.72^a
S₄₅	13.33±0.87^a	4.88±0.24^ab	17.20±1.39^ab	156.27±11.96^ab
S₃₅	12.80±0.70^ab	4.51±0.36^bc	15.13±0.21^bc	147.63±9.69^ab
CK	11.30±0.92^b	4.22±0.33^c	13.83±1.76^c	137.87±9.36^b

处理 treat ment	绿叶数 Number of green leaves (个)	地上部Above ground		地下部Under ground	根冠比 Root shoot ratio	单株总鲜重 Total fresh weight per plant (g)
处理 treat ment	绿叶数 Number of green leaves (个)	叶片鲜重比例 Fresh weight ratio of leaves(%)	叶柄鲜重比例 Fresh weight ratio of petiole (%)	块根鲜重比例 Fresh weight ratio of root tuber(%)	根冠比 Root shoot ratio	单株总鲜重 Total fresh weight per plant (g)
S₅₅	17.33±1.53^a	38.32±0.75^a	26.43±0.70^a	35.25±1.45^b	0.54±0.03^b	465.63±12.08^a
S₄₅	17.00±1.00^a	37.38±0.85^ab	26.37±0.33^a	36.26±1.15^ab	0.57±0.03^ab	430.63±20.93^b
S₃₅	16.33±1.53^a	36.34±0.74^b	25.77±0.35^a	37.89±1.00^a	0.61±0.03^a	389.37±15.83^c
CK	14.67±1.53^a	34.85±0.79^c	26.68±0.45^a	38.46±1.08^a	0.63±0.03^a	358.20±15.55^d

处理 treat ment	绿叶数 Number of green leaves (个)	地上部Above ground		地下部Under ground	根冠比 Root shoot ratio	单株总鲜重 Total fresh weight per plant (g)
处理 treat ment	绿叶数 Number of green leaves (个)	叶片鲜重比例 Fresh weight ratio of leaves(%)	叶柄鲜重比例 Fresh weight ratio of petiole (%)	块根鲜重比例 Fresh weight ratio of root tuber(%)	根冠比 Root shoot ratio	单株总鲜重 Total fresh weight per plant (g)
S₅₅	17.33±1.53^a	38.32±0.75^a	26.43±0.70^a	35.25±1.45^b	0.54±0.03^b	465.63±12.08^a
S₄₅	17.00±1.00^a	37.38±0.85^ab	26.37±0.33^a	36.26±1.15^ab	0.57±0.03^ab	430.63±20.93^b
S₃₅	16.33±1.53^a	36.34±0.74^b	25.77±0.35^a	37.89±1.00^a	0.61±0.03^a	389.37±15.83^c
CK	14.67±1.53^a	34.85±0.79^c	26.68±0.45^a	38.46±1.08^a	0.63±0.03^a	358.20±15.55^d

指标Index		L₁	L₂	L₃	L₄	L₅	L₆	L₇	L₈
块根长 Root length	叶片长	0.55	0.44	0.43	0.53	0.73^**	0.52	0.61^*	0.49
	叶片宽	0.50	0.70^*	0.76^**	0.62^*	0.61^*	0.62^*	0.61^*	0.4
	叶片鲜重	0.75^**	0.89^**	0.72^**	0.86^**	0.83^**	0.74^**	0.82^**	0.58^*
	叶柄长	0.29	0.78^**	0.57	0.52	0.37	0.36	0.45	0.48
	叶柄粗	0.50	0.22	0.44	0.46	0.53	0.69^*	0.61^*	0.45
	叶柄鲜重	0.66^*	0.69^*	0.67^*	0.35	0.39	0.77^**	0.76^**	0.71^**
块根直径 Root diometer	叶片长	0.57	0.38	0.46	0.62^*	0.68^*	0.56	0.65^*	0.62^*
	叶片宽	0.55	0.79^**	0.66^*	0.68^*	0.69^*	0.58^*	0.55	0.54
	叶片鲜重	0.80^**	0.92^**	0.65^*	0.79^**	0.82^**	0.77^**	0.87^**	0.63^*
	叶柄长	0.29	0.73^**	0.57	0.56	0.34	0.36	0.27	0.4
	叶柄粗	0.41	0.15	0.42	0.40	0.50	0.73^**	0.59^*	0.52
	叶柄鲜重	0.54	0.78^**	0.65^*	0.32	0.33	0.77^**	0.81^**	0.82^**
块根围 Root circumferent	叶片长	0.39	0.41	0.43	0.58^*	0.78^**	0.51	0.71^**	0.49
	叶片宽	0.49	0.63^*	0.68^*	0.55	0.57	0.69^*	0.70^*	0.38
	叶片鲜重	0.75^**	0.89^**	0.78^**	0.81^**	0.91^**	0.77^**	0.82^**	0.64^*
	叶柄长	0.40	0.72^**	0.57	0.44	0.38	0.44	0.31	0.51
	叶柄粗	0.45	0.20	0.51	0.42	0.50	0.67^*	0.70^*	0.50
	叶柄鲜重	0.52	0.61^*	0.65^*	0.45	0.27	0.77^**	0.76^**	0.74^**
块根鲜重 Fresh weight of root	叶片长	0.47	0.29	0.43	0.59^*	0.63^*	0.51	0.54	0.56
	叶片宽	0.44	0.74^**	0.62^*	0.67^*	0.64^*	0.45	0.58^*	0.42
	叶片鲜重	0.67^*	0.86^**	0.58^*	0.77^**	0.80^**	0.70^*	0.80^**	0.54
	叶柄长	0.29	0.60^*	0.57	0.40	0.36	0.34	0.22	0.34
	叶柄粗	0.41	0.01	0.49	0.25	0.45	0.75^**	0.59^*	0.46
	叶柄鲜重	0.51	0.74^**	0.70^*	0.34	0.19	0.71^**	0.69^*	0.70^*

深松对叶丛生长期甜菜形态结构特性及生物量积累特性的影响

Effects of Subsoiling on the Characteristics of Morphological Structure and Biomass Accumulation of Sugar Beet in Long-term Leaf Cluster

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴梦露, 孙清明, 吴娇娇, 王凯, 杨旸, 杨益众, 苏宏华. 重金属镉胁迫对甜菜夜蛾体内保幼激素和蜕皮激素滴度的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2291-2297.
[2]	杨梦琪, 南珊珊, 张晓羊, 王海亮, 李佳橙, 牛俊丽, 聂存喜, 张文举. 发酵棉籽粕膳食纤维对黄羽肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能及肠道形态的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1011-1019.
[3]	陈英花, 白如霄, 王娟, 范守杰, 张新疆, 危常州. 叶面喷施油菜素内酯和亚精胺对甜菜生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 698-705.
[4]	程文亮, 宋文钰, 王浩东, 许同心, 吴彩兰, 王春娟, 杨德松. 基于QuEChERS-GC/MS法对土壤和甜菜中精异丙甲草胺的残留降解动态测定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 706-714.
[5]	王旭, 和海秀, 范守杰, 彭椿皓, 王瑞楠, 孟玲, 徐巧, 白如霄, 崔瑜. 生物降解地膜对甜菜生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2735-2741.
[6]	荣华, 张卢慧, 刘龙, 郑童童, 雷斌, 郭庆元. 甜菜黄萎病菌生物学特性及16种杀菌剂的毒力比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1984-1992.
[7]	毛廷勇, 孔杰, 胡守林, 张伟, 陈佳林, 李燕芳, 万素梅, 陈国栋. 不同陆地棉纤维发育重要阶段形态学差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 279-290.
[8]	赵志强, 张卢慧, 赵全新, 郭庆元. 新疆发现甜菜新病害甜菜黄萎病[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 425-432.
[9]	孙琳琳, 胡华兵, 刘建雄, 袁团团, 郇町, 丁兆斐, 刘珣, 刘长兵. 甜菜营养生长期糖分积累及块根膨大规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2431-2437.
[10]	林明, 鲁伟丹, 曹禹, 李蔚农, 陈友强, 刘华君, 潘竟海, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 王志敏. 新疆不同甜菜种植区域生产成本比较效益分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2438-2445.
[11]	刘琪龙, 韩海霞, 包晓玮, 钟志明, 马强. 甜菜红素喷雾干燥粉抗氧化活性及其咀嚼片的研制[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(6): 1145-1153.
[12]	沙红, 高燕, 董心久, 高卫时, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨洪泽. 利用流式细胞术检测甜菜染色体倍性和DNAC-值[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(5): 822-828.
[13]	陈友强, 杨洪泽, 孔繁阳, 潘金龙, 潘竞海, 刘华君, 阿布都·卡地尔, 俞天胜, 林明. 不同甜菜品种SPAD值与块根产量及含糖率的相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2200-2207.
[14]	潘竟海, 张恒, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 刘华君, 杨洪泽, 李锦虎, 伊力达尔江·阿不力米提, 张保. 矮壮素对甜菜糖分积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8): 1411-1420.
[15]	窦亚楠, 安静杰, 高占林, 党志红, 潘文亮, 李耀发. 双酰胺类杀虫剂对甜菜夜蛾毒力的温度效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4): 658-664.