Effects of Different Rootstocks on Leaf Characteristics of Crimson Seedless Grape

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.015

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To compare and analyze the effects of 6 diffterent rootstocks on leaf appearancetraits,chlorophyll content and leaf tissue structure of Crimson seedless grapes in the hope of providing a theorelical basis for screening out rootstocks that are more conducive to leaf development of the grapes.【Method】 The Crimson seedless grape grafted with 6 rootstocks of 5BB, 101-14MG, 110R, 5C, SO4, and Betta were used as the test materials, and its grafted root seedlings and their own root seedlings were used as double controls for the study.Furthermore, the leaves, petioles, The chlorophyll content and leaf skin thickness, palisade tissue thickness, sponge tissue thickness and other leaf tissue structures were measured.【Results】 Grafting of 6 rootstocks with Crimson seedless grapes affected their leaf characteristics, chlorophyll content and leaf tissue structure.Among them, the leaf length (145.92 mm), leaf width (202.35 mm) and leaf area (145.69 mm²) of the Crimson seedless grape grafted with rootstock 5BB were 17.02%, 21.69% and 33.07% higher than those of Crimson seedlings, respectively.The seedlings grafted with nuclear rootstock were 15.22%, 21.36% and 33.12% higher, respectively.The 5BB rootstock grafted with Crimson seedless could significantly improve the leaf quality.Crimson seedless grafted with 5BB performed best in petiole length (124.59 mm), petiole width (3.95 mm), and petiole thickness (3.60 mm), which was significantly higher than those of other treatments, indicating that 5BB was beneficial to petioles development.Rootstock 101-14MG and Crimson seedless grafted seedlings had the highest chlorophyll content (42.50), which was 19.45% higher than that of Crimson seedless grafted seedlings (35.58), but 4.78% lower than that of the self-rooted seedlings (44.53); different rootstocks and Crimson seedless grafting had different effects on the leaf tissue structure.Among them, the thickness of the leaf tissue of the Crimson seedless grape grafted with the rootstock 110R (207.80 μm), the thickness of the epidermis (21.48 μm), the thickness of the fence tissue (55.94 μm), and the thickness of the sponge tissue (109.75 μm) were significantly higher than those of other stocks and stock combinations.Compared with the control group, it was significantly improved, and the leaf tissue structure was the best.【Conclusion】 Based on various indicators, among the 6 rootstocks, 5BB grafted Crimson seedless leaves and petioles have the best appearance traits.Rootstock 101-14MG and grafted Crimson seedless have the highest chlorophyll content.Rootstock 110R grafted Crimson seedless leaf tissue structure is the best, so rootstocks 5BB, 101-14MG, and 110R are excellent rootstocks that might be more conducive to the growth and development of Crimson seedless leaves.

Key words: rootstock; Crimson seedless grape; leaf characteristics

摘要：

【目的】比较分析6种不同砧木对克瑞森无核葡萄叶片外观性状、叶绿素含量及叶片组织结构的影响,为筛选出有利于克瑞森无核葡萄叶片发育的砧木提供理论依据。【方法】以5BB、101-14MG、110R、5C、SO4、贝达6种砧木嫁接的克瑞森无核葡萄为试材,以克瑞森无核本砧嫁接苗及其自根苗为双对照,测定叶片、叶柄、叶绿素含量及叶片表皮厚度、栅栏组织厚度、海绵组织厚度等叶片组织结构。【结果】6种砧木与克瑞森无核葡萄嫁接对其叶片特性、叶绿素含量及叶片组织结构均会产生影响。其中砧木5BB嫁接的克瑞森无核葡萄叶长(145.92 mm)、叶宽(202.35 mm)、叶面积(145.69 mm²)较自根苗分别高17.02%、21.69%和33.07%,较克瑞森无核本砧嫁接苗分别高15.22%、21.36%和33.12%,砧木5BB嫁接克瑞森无核可显著提高叶片质量。克瑞森无核嫁接5BB在叶柄长(124.59 mm)、叶柄宽(3.95 mm)、叶柄厚(3.60 mm)表现最优,显著高于其他处理,克瑞森无核嫁接5BB有利于叶柄的发育。砧木101-14MG与克瑞森无核嫁接叶绿素含量最高(42.50),比克瑞森无核本砧嫁接苗(35.58)高19.45%,但比自根苗(44.53)低4.78%;不同砧木与克瑞森无核嫁接对叶片组织结构影响不同,其中以砧木110R嫁接的克瑞森无核葡萄叶片厚度(207.80 μm)、下表皮厚度(21.48 μm)、栅栏组织厚度(55.94 μm)、海绵组织厚度(109.75 μm)显著高于其他砧穗组合,相比对照组有明显提升,叶片组织结构最好。【结论】在6个砧木中以5BB嫁接克瑞森无核叶片和叶柄外观性状最优,砧木101-14MG与克瑞森无核嫁接叶绿素含量最高,砧木110R嫁接的克瑞森无核叶片组织结构表现最佳,砧木5BB、101-14MG、110R是较有利于克瑞森无核叶片生长发育的优良砧木。

关键词: 砧木, 克瑞森无核, 叶片特性

CLC Number:

S663.1

HU Xin, XIAN He, ZHANG Fuchun, ZHOU Xiaoming, HAN Shouan, WANG Min, DING Xiang, PAN Mingqi, ZHONG Haixia, ZENG Bin, WU Xinyu. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Leaf Characteristics of Crimson Seedless Grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2466-2474.

胡鑫, 仙鹤, 张付春, 周晓明, 韩守安, 王敏, 丁祥, 潘明启, 钟海霞, 曾斌, 伍新宇. 不同砧木对克瑞森无核葡萄叶片特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2466-2474.

Figures/Tables 4

References 28

[1]	韩守安, 廖康, 潘明启, 等. 克瑞森葡萄主干环剥后果实可溶性糖组分及含量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(11): 2021-2027. DOI
	HAN Shouan, LIAO Kang, PAN Mingqi, et al. Analysis of the soluble sugar components and content of the girdling of the main stem of Crimson grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(11): 2021-2027. DOI
[2]	罗龙, 井双泉, 刘怀锋, 等. 着色期通风降温对设施克伦生葡萄品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019,(9): 81-84.
	LUO Long, JING Shuangquan, LIU Huaifeng, et al. The effect of ventilation and temperature reduction during the coloring period on the quality of green grapes in facility[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019,(9): 81-84.
[3]	阮班录, 刘承德, 司春爱. 晚熟克瑞森无核葡萄栽培技术[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2014, 60(4): 115-118.
	RUAN Banlu, LIU Chengde, SI Chun'ai. Cultivation technology of late-ripening Crimson seedless grapes[J]. Shaanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 60(4): 115-118.
[4]	张永辉, 刘力水, 周友缘, 等. 克瑞森无核葡萄在云南干热河谷区引种表现及关键栽培技术[J]. 热带农业科学, 2018, 38(9): 14-17.
	ZHANG Yonghui, LIU Lishui, ZHOU Youyuan, et al. Introduction performance and key cultivation techniques of Crimson seedless grapes in the dry and hot valley of Yunnan[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2018, 38(9): 14-17.
[5]	邱毅, 史祥宾, 魏长存, 等. 新疆产区‘克瑞森无核’葡萄轻简化生产关键技术[J]. 中国果树, 2018,(4): 100-102.
	QIU Yi, SHI Xiangbin, WEI Changcun, et al. The key technology of lightly simplified production of ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes in Xinjiang production area[J]. China Fruits, 2018,(4): 100-102.
[6]	马建江, 罗树祥. 新疆南疆地区“克瑞森”葡萄设施栽培技术[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(6): 43-45.
	MA Jianjiang, LUO Shuxiang. Facility cultivation technology of “Crimson" grapes in southern Xinjiang[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(6): 43-45.
[7]	杨湘, 苏学德, 李鹏程, 等. 不同土壤水势对克瑞森葡萄光合生理及果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(7): 1429-1434.
	YANG Xiang, SU Xuede, LI Pengcheng, et al. Effects of different soil water potentials on photosynthetic physiology and fruit quality of Crimson grape[J]. Journal of Southwest Agriculture, 2020, 33(7): 1429-1434.
[8]	沐婵, 钱荣青, 胡选江, 等. 不同施肥对克瑞森葡萄产量及养分带走量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2020,(6): 181-183,272.
	MU Chan, QIAN Rongqing, HU Xuanjiang, et al. Effects of different fertilization on the yield and nutrient removal of Crimsongrapes[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020,(6): 181-183,272.
[9]	杨江山, 许尔文, 吴玉霞, 等. 临泽县克瑞森无核葡萄设施延后优质丰产栽培技术[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2016,(3): 34-36.
	YANG Jiangshan, XU Erwen, WU Yuxia, et al. Cultivation techniques for high-quality and high-yield cultivation of Crimson seedless grapes in Linze County[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapeswine & Wine, 2016,(3): 34-36.
[10]	Forneck A, Powell K S, Walker M A. Scientific opinion:improving the definition of grape phylloxera biotypes and standardizing biotype screening protocols[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2016, 67: 371-376. DOI URL
[11]	Markus W E, Julia L, and Jacqueline M R, et al. Polyphenolic profiling of roots (Vitis spp.) under grape phylloxera (D.vitifoliae Fitch) attack[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2019, 135: 174-181. DOI PMID
[12]	李超, 白世践, 赵荣华, 等. 葡萄砧木及其应用的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(5): 53-59.
	LI Chao, BAI Shijian, ZHAO Ronghua, et al. Research progress on grape rootstocks and their applications[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2016, 6(5): 53-59.
[13]	李鹏程, 李铭, 郭绍杰, 等. 几种葡萄砧木的引种表现及抗寒性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, (34): 93-97.
	LI Pengcheng, LI Ming, GUO Shaojie, et al. Introduction performance and cold resistance analysis of several grape rootstocks[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, (34): 93-97.
[14]	高振, 翟衡, 臧兴隆, 等. 利用低温放热法分析8个葡萄砧木和6个栽培品种芽的抗寒性[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(1): 17-25.
	GAO Zhen, ZHAI Heng, ZANG Xinglong, et al. Using low temperature exothermic method to analyze the cold resistance of 8 grape rootstocks and 6 cultivars buds[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(1): 17-25.
[15]	陈绍莉, 郭修武. 葡萄砧木的抗旱性鉴定与研究[J]. 中国果树, 2009,(1):38-42.
	CHEN Shaoli, GUO Xiuwu. Identification and research on drought resistance of grape rootstocks[J]. China Fruits, 2009,(1): 38-42.
[16]	李敏敏, 袁军伟, 刘长江, 等. 砧木对河北昌黎产区赤霞珠葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):59-63.
	LI Minmin, YUAN Junwei, LIU Changjiang, et al. Effects of rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes in Changli, Hebei[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 59-63.
[17]	沈碧薇, 魏灵珠, 崔鹏飞, 等. 不同砧木对‘瑞都红玉’葡萄生长结果与果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37 (3): 350-361.
	SHEN Biwei, WEI Lingzhu, CUI Pengfei, et al. The effects of different rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of the'Ruidu Hongyu' grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(3): 350-361.
[18]	Lourens, Poorter F, Bongers. Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species[J]. Ecology, 2006, 87(7): 1733-43. PMID
[19]	陈栋, 涂美艳, 李靖, 等. 不同黄化程度桃叶片生理指标及矿质养分含量差异研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(4):1522-1526.
	CHEN Dong, TU Meiyan, LI Jing, et al. Differences in physiological indexes and mineral nutrient contents of peach leaves with different degrees of yellowing[J]. Southwest Agricultural Journal, 2014, 27(4): 1522-1526.
[20]	陈德兴, 王天铎. 叶片叶肉结构对环境光强的适应及对光合作用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 1990,(2):142-148.
	CHEN Dexing, WANG Tianduo. The adaptation of leaf mesophyll structure to environmental light intensity and its influence on photosynthesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1990,(2): 142-148.
[21]	张付春, 宋晓辉, 钟海霞, 等. 砧木对赤霞珠9葡萄叶片质量和光合光效的影响研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(7):1223-1231.
	ZHANG Fuchun, SONG Xiaohui, ZHONG Haixia, et al. The effect of rootstocks on the leaf quality and photosynthetic efficiency of Cabernet Sauvignon 9 grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(7): 1223-1231.
[22]	Bascuñán-Godoy L, Franck N, Zamorano D, et al. Rootstock effect on irrigated grapevine yield under arid climate conditions are explained by changes in traits related to light absorption of the scion[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 218: 284-292.. DOI URL
[23]	程建徽. 3种砧木对金手指葡萄的影响[J]. 山西果树, 2009,(3):55.
	CHENG Jianhui. The influence of three rootstocks on Golden Finger grape[J]. Shanxi Fruit Tree, 2009,(3): 55.
[24]	高展, 彭媛媛, 董凯向, 等. 不同砧木对马瑟兰葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(5): 170-176. DOI
	GAO Zhan, PENG Yuanyuan, DONG Kaixiang, et al. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of Marselan grape[J]. North China Agricultural Journal, 2019, 34(5): 170-176.
[25]	翟晨, 赵宝龙, 潘立忠, 等. 不同抗性砧木对2年生赤霞珠葡萄生长发育的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(10): 104-109.
	ZHAI Chen, ZHAO Baolong, PAN Lizhong, et al. Effects of different resistant rootstocks on the growth and development of 2-year-old Cabernet Sauvignon grapes[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(10): 104-109.
[26]	李双岑, 马丹阳, 王振平. 不同砧木对1年生赤霞珠葡萄光合特性和生长的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016,(2): 45-48.
	LI Shuangcen, MA Danyang, WANG Zhenping. Effects of different rootstocks on photosynthetic characteristics and growth of one-year-old Cabernet Sauvignon grapes[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2016,(2): 45-48.
[27]	李超, 白世践, 陈光, 等. 砧木对‘赤霞珠’葡萄初期生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(4):57-62.
	LI Chao, BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, et al. The effect of rootstock on the initial growth and fruit quality of'Cabernet Sauvignon' grape[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 6(4): 57-62.
[28]	韩晓, 王海波, 王孝娣, 等. 不同砧木对“87-1”葡萄叶片质量及净光合速率的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2017, 46(3): 143-147.
	HAN Xiao, WANG Haibo, WANG Xiaodi, et al. Effects of different rootstocks on the leaf quality and net photosynthetic rate of "87-1" grape[J]. South China Fruit Tree, 2017, 46(3): 143-147.

处理 Treatment	叶长 Leaf length (mm)	叶宽 Leaf width (mm)	叶面积 leaf area (mm²)	叶柄长 Petiole length (mm)	叶柄宽 Petiole width(mm)	叶柄厚 Petiole thic kness(mm)
克瑞森无核/5BB Crimson seedless/5BB	145.92±22.63^a	202.35±23.64^a	145.69±19.77^a	124.59±22.80^a	3.95±0.56^a	3.60±0.47^a
克瑞森无核/101-14MG Crimson seedless/101-14MG	120.23±17.04^c	170.55±33.24^bc	146.85±11.54^a	102.60±19.89^b	3.38±0.41^bcd	2.99±0.45^b
克瑞森无核/110R Crimson seedless/110R	132.42±22.18^abc	186.75±31.78^abc	136.60±18.49^abc	124.04±27.50^a	3.52±0.62^abc	3.10±0.58^b
克瑞森无核/5C Crimson seedless/5C	134.12±27.06^abc	181.03±27.03^bc	139.94±2.78^ab	122.09±28.89^a	3.69±0.73^ab	3.14±0.62^b
克瑞森无核/SO4 Crimson seedless/SO4	135.44±11.69^ab	187.88±22.61^ab	130.09±19.50^abc	108.69±12.21^ab	3.68±0.44^ab	3.03±0.36^b
克瑞森无核/贝达 Crimson seedless/Beta	92.43±11.83^d	132.90±22.36^d	118.76±7.32^abc	82.10±14.80^c	2.91±0.56^d	2.52±0.46^c
克瑞森无核/克瑞森无核 Crimson seedless/Crimson seedless	126.65±13.76^bc	166.73±21.55^c	109.44±12.95^bc	86.01±14.07^c	3.22±0.94^bcd	3.03±0.62^b
克瑞森无核自根 Crimson seedless self-rooted	124.70±14.96^bc	166.29±22.58^c	109.48±9.21^bc	105.31±19.58^b	3.07±0.46^cd	2.46±0.37^c

处理 Treatment	叶长 Leaf length (mm)	叶宽 Leaf width (mm)	叶面积 leaf area (mm²)	叶柄长 Petiole length (mm)	叶柄宽 Petiole width(mm)	叶柄厚 Petiole thic kness(mm)
克瑞森无核/5BB Crimson seedless/5BB	145.92±22.63^a	202.35±23.64^a	145.69±19.77^a	124.59±22.80^a	3.95±0.56^a	3.60±0.47^a
克瑞森无核/101-14MG Crimson seedless/101-14MG	120.23±17.04^c	170.55±33.24^bc	146.85±11.54^a	102.60±19.89^b	3.38±0.41^bcd	2.99±0.45^b
克瑞森无核/110R Crimson seedless/110R	132.42±22.18^abc	186.75±31.78^abc	136.60±18.49^abc	124.04±27.50^a	3.52±0.62^abc	3.10±0.58^b
克瑞森无核/5C Crimson seedless/5C	134.12±27.06^abc	181.03±27.03^bc	139.94±2.78^ab	122.09±28.89^a	3.69±0.73^ab	3.14±0.62^b
克瑞森无核/SO4 Crimson seedless/SO4	135.44±11.69^ab	187.88±22.61^ab	130.09±19.50^abc	108.69±12.21^ab	3.68±0.44^ab	3.03±0.36^b
克瑞森无核/贝达 Crimson seedless/Beta	92.43±11.83^d	132.90±22.36^d	118.76±7.32^abc	82.10±14.80^c	2.91±0.56^d	2.52±0.46^c
克瑞森无核/克瑞森无核 Crimson seedless/Crimson seedless	126.65±13.76^bc	166.73±21.55^c	109.44±12.95^bc	86.01±14.07^c	3.22±0.94^bcd	3.03±0.62^b
克瑞森无核自根 Crimson seedless self-rooted	124.70±14.96^bc	166.29±22.58^c	109.48±9.21^bc	105.31±19.58^b	3.07±0.46^cd	2.46±0.37^c

处理 Treatment	上表皮厚度 Thickness of Upper- epidermis(μm)	下表皮厚度 Thickness of Lower- epidermis(μm)	叶片厚度 Thickness of leaf(μm)	栅栏组织厚 Thickness of Palisade tissue(μm)	海绵组织厚度 Thickness of Spongy tissue(μm)	栅栏组织/ 海绵组织 Palisade tissue/ Spongy tissue
克瑞森无核/5BB Crimson seedless/5BB	12.58±3.27^d	20.81±6.11^a	183.18±12.61^d	56.83±10.38^a	81.45±13.85^d	0.72±0.20^a
克瑞森无核/101-14MG Crimson seedless/101-14MG	16.40±3.03^bc	16.23±2.67^b	187.77±9.19^cd	46.03±7.07^b	98.80±10.40^b	0.47±0.09^f
克瑞森无核/110R Crimson seedless/110R	15.75±1.67^bc	21.48±3.92^a	207.80±8.95^a	55.94±6.46^a	109.75±14.11^a	0.52±0.10def
克瑞森无核/5C Crimson seedless/5C	16.32±2.87^bc	15.80±2.95^bc	172.33±8.89^e	48.60±5.45^b	88.61±11.35^c	0.56±0.12^bcd
克瑞森无核/SO4 Crimson seedless/SO4	16.61±3.20^b	19.94±3.96^a	191.95±13.12^c	55.50±9.08^a	91.75±10.34^c	0.61±0.13^b
克瑞森无核/贝达 Crimson seedless/Beta	14.74±2.35^c	14.06±2.52^c	182.56±8.79^d	48.52±6.94^b	100.36±8.86^b	0.49±0.09^ef
克瑞森无核/克瑞森无核 Crimson seedless/Crimson seedless	16.34±3.94^bc	14.14±3.39^c	175.51±10.70^e	53.09±6.49^a	89.26±12.19^c	0.61±0.11^bc
克瑞森无核自根 Crimson seedless self-rooted	18.26±3.42^a	19.38±4.12^a	197.08±6.72^b	53.20±4.49^a	97.92±8.47^b	0.55±0.07^cde

处理 Treatment	上表皮厚度 Thickness of Upper- epidermis(μm)	下表皮厚度 Thickness of Lower- epidermis(μm)	叶片厚度 Thickness of leaf(μm)	栅栏组织厚 Thickness of Palisade tissue(μm)	海绵组织厚度 Thickness of Spongy tissue(μm)	栅栏组织/ 海绵组织 Palisade tissue/ Spongy tissue
克瑞森无核/5BB Crimson seedless/5BB	12.58±3.27^d	20.81±6.11^a	183.18±12.61^d	56.83±10.38^a	81.45±13.85^d	0.72±0.20^a
克瑞森无核/101-14MG Crimson seedless/101-14MG	16.40±3.03^bc	16.23±2.67^b	187.77±9.19^cd	46.03±7.07^b	98.80±10.40^b	0.47±0.09^f
克瑞森无核/110R Crimson seedless/110R	15.75±1.67^bc	21.48±3.92^a	207.80±8.95^a	55.94±6.46^a	109.75±14.11^a	0.52±0.10def
克瑞森无核/5C Crimson seedless/5C	16.32±2.87^bc	15.80±2.95^bc	172.33±8.89^e	48.60±5.45^b	88.61±11.35^c	0.56±0.12^bcd
克瑞森无核/SO4 Crimson seedless/SO4	16.61±3.20^b	19.94±3.96^a	191.95±13.12^c	55.50±9.08^a	91.75±10.34^c	0.61±0.13^b
克瑞森无核/贝达 Crimson seedless/Beta	14.74±2.35^c	14.06±2.52^c	182.56±8.79^d	48.52±6.94^b	100.36±8.86^b	0.49±0.09^ef
克瑞森无核/克瑞森无核 Crimson seedless/Crimson seedless	16.34±3.94^bc	14.14±3.39^c	175.51±10.70^e	53.09±6.49^a	89.26±12.19^c	0.61±0.11^bc
克瑞森无核自根 Crimson seedless self-rooted	18.26±3.42^a	19.38±4.12^a	197.08±6.72^b	53.20±4.49^a	97.92±8.47^b	0.55±0.07^cde