Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 797-809.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.04.003
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Tongrui(), GAO Zhen, WANG Jichuan(
), SHI Yuanqiang, LIU Qiang, ZHOU Xiang, CHEN Xuemei, WANG Zhenyang
Received:
2021-07-12
Online:
2022-04-20
Published:
2022-04-24
Correspondence author:
WANG Jichuan
Supported by:
李同蕊(), 高振, 王冀川(
), 石元强, 刘强, 周相, 陈雪梅, 王振洋
通讯作者:
王冀川
作者简介:
李同蕊(1997-),女,宁夏银川人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物生理,(E-mail) 1335801071@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Tongrui, GAO Zhen, WANG Jichuan, SHI Yuanqiang, LIU Qiang, ZHOU Xiang, CHEN Xuemei, WANG Zhenyang. Effects of Different Irrigation Amounts and Densities on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Membrane-Free Cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 797-809.
李同蕊, 高振, 王冀川, 石元强, 刘强, 周相, 陈雪梅, 王振洋. 不同灌水量和密度对无膜棉光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 797-809.
Fig.1 LAI dynamics of membrane-free cotton population under different irrigation amount and density Note:①PBS, FBS, IFS, PFS, BS and BOS of abscissa scale icon indicate the primary bud stage, full bud stage, initial flowering stage, peak flowering stage, boll stage and boll opening stage, respectively; ②Different small in the same column meant significant difference in different density treatments at the same irrigation level (P<0.05).The same as below
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 9.50b | 12.31c | 21.41b | 20.49c | 8.50c |
M2 | 10.61a | 13.37c | 24.01ab | 21.00c | 10.22b | |
M3 | 10.85a | 16.61a | 26.76a | 25.97a | 11.84a | |
M4 | 10.39ab | 15.20b | 24.2 | 23.82b | 11.30ab | |
均值 | 10.34 | 14.37 | 24.11 | 22.82 | 10.47 | |
W2 | M1 | 11.64c | 15.05c | 24.91c | 24.09c | 7.08d |
M2 | 12.13c | 16.6 | 27.3 | 27.49b | 9.05c | |
M3 | 15.55a | 20.80a | 32.15a | 30.44a | 15.83a | |
M4 | 13.82b | 17.86b | 29.1 | 27.68b | 13.99b | |
均值 | 13.29 | 17.6 | 28.36 | 27.42 | 11.49 | |
W3 | M1 | 9.84c | 12.43c | 22.77c | 20.97b | 8.93b |
M2 | 10.7 | 14.0 | 25.19b | 24.2 | 8.54b | |
M3 | 12.22a | 18.28a | 29.73a | 28.63a | 10.77a | |
M4 | 11.7 | 15.9 | 26.04b | 25.5 | 6.85c | |
均值 | 11.14 | 15.18 | 25.98 | 24.84 | 8.77 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 69.46** | 19.76** | 203.75** | 15.47** | 68.12** |
M | 13.43* | 145.11** | 403.46** | 19.89** | 15.89* | |
W×M | 14.92** | 18.34** | 16.04** | 10.62** | 32.33** |
Table 1 Effects of different irrigation volume and density on the P n of membrane-free cotton [μmolCO2/(m2·s)]
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 9.50b | 12.31c | 21.41b | 20.49c | 8.50c |
M2 | 10.61a | 13.37c | 24.01ab | 21.00c | 10.22b | |
M3 | 10.85a | 16.61a | 26.76a | 25.97a | 11.84a | |
M4 | 10.39ab | 15.20b | 24.2 | 23.82b | 11.30ab | |
均值 | 10.34 | 14.37 | 24.11 | 22.82 | 10.47 | |
W2 | M1 | 11.64c | 15.05c | 24.91c | 24.09c | 7.08d |
M2 | 12.13c | 16.6 | 27.3 | 27.49b | 9.05c | |
M3 | 15.55a | 20.80a | 32.15a | 30.44a | 15.83a | |
M4 | 13.82b | 17.86b | 29.1 | 27.68b | 13.99b | |
均值 | 13.29 | 17.6 | 28.36 | 27.42 | 11.49 | |
W3 | M1 | 9.84c | 12.43c | 22.77c | 20.97b | 8.93b |
M2 | 10.7 | 14.0 | 25.19b | 24.2 | 8.54b | |
M3 | 12.22a | 18.28a | 29.73a | 28.63a | 10.77a | |
M4 | 11.7 | 15.9 | 26.04b | 25.5 | 6.85c | |
均值 | 11.14 | 15.18 | 25.98 | 24.84 | 8.77 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 69.46** | 19.76** | 203.75** | 15.47** | 68.12** |
M | 13.43* | 145.11** | 403.46** | 19.89** | 15.89* | |
W×M | 14.92** | 18.34** | 16.04** | 10.62** | 32.33** |
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 0.27c | 0.32c | 0.49b | 0.32c | 0.1 |
M2 | 0.32b | 0.37c | 0.53b | 0.45b | 0.1 | |
M3 | 0.41a | 0.59a | 0.74a | 0.59a | 0.15a | |
M4 | 0.38a | 0.50b | 0.70a | 0.5 | 0.08c | |
均值 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.11 | |
W2 | M1 | 0.34c | 0.41d | 0.66c | 0.49b | 0.08c |
M2 | 0.3 | 0.51c | 0.74c | 0.5 | 0.11b | |
M3 | 0.46a | 0.68a | 1.07a | 0.71a | 0.11b | |
M4 | 0.4 | 0.56b | 0.93b | 0.68a | 0.15a | |
均值 | 0.4 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.11 | |
W3 | M1 | 0.28b | 0.41c | 0.54c | 0.43d | 0.13b |
M2 | 0.3 | 0.46c | 0.70b | 0.53c | 0.07c | |
M3 | 0.43a | 0.65a | 0.91a | 0.67a | 0.18a | |
M4 | 0.4 | 0.51b | 0.87a | 0.58b | 0.11b | |
均值 | 0.36 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.12 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 15.49** | 102.0** | 105.07** | 31.02** | 39.05** |
M | 10.78* | 15.26* | 286.54** | 15.77* | 3.80ns | |
W×M | 9.19** | 42.23** | 73.28* | 13.46** | 17.84** |
Table 2 Effects of different irrigation volume and density on the Gs of membrane-free cotton [mol/(m2·s)]
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 0.27c | 0.32c | 0.49b | 0.32c | 0.1 |
M2 | 0.32b | 0.37c | 0.53b | 0.45b | 0.1 | |
M3 | 0.41a | 0.59a | 0.74a | 0.59a | 0.15a | |
M4 | 0.38a | 0.50b | 0.70a | 0.5 | 0.08c | |
均值 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.11 | |
W2 | M1 | 0.34c | 0.41d | 0.66c | 0.49b | 0.08c |
M2 | 0.3 | 0.51c | 0.74c | 0.5 | 0.11b | |
M3 | 0.46a | 0.68a | 1.07a | 0.71a | 0.11b | |
M4 | 0.4 | 0.56b | 0.93b | 0.68a | 0.15a | |
均值 | 0.4 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.11 | |
W3 | M1 | 0.28b | 0.41c | 0.54c | 0.43d | 0.13b |
M2 | 0.3 | 0.46c | 0.70b | 0.53c | 0.07c | |
M3 | 0.43a | 0.65a | 0.91a | 0.67a | 0.18a | |
M4 | 0.4 | 0.51b | 0.87a | 0.58b | 0.11b | |
均值 | 0.36 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.12 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 15.49** | 102.0** | 105.07** | 31.02** | 39.05** |
M | 10.78* | 15.26* | 286.54** | 15.77* | 3.80ns | |
W×M | 9.19** | 42.23** | 73.28* | 13.46** | 17.84** |
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 4.05d | 7.13d | 8.23d | 4.24c | 1.08d |
M2 | 5.62c | 8.01c | 9.62c | 5.90b | 2.75c | |
M3 | 8.11a | 9.26a | 11.31b | 6.76a | 3.38a | |
M4 | 6.31b | 8.30b | 10.35a | 6.11b | 2.04b | |
均值 | 6.02 | 8.18 | 9.88 | 5.75 | 2.31 | |
W2 | M1 | 6.43b | 8.16b | 9.70c | 6.26b | 2.67d |
M2 | 7.83a | 8.5 | 12.54b | 6.43b | 3.35c | |
M3 | 7.58a | 10.64a | 13.87a | 8.38a | 4.52a | |
M4 | 6.70b | 8.95c | 13.40a | 6.53b | 3.95b | |
均值 | 7.14 | 9.08 | 12.38 | 6.9 | 3.62 | |
W3 | M1 | 5.80d | 6.78c | 9.04a | 6.31b | 1.66d |
M2 | 6.24c | 8.23b | 11.27b | 5.84b | 2.45c | |
M3 | 8.36a | 10.47a | 12.78a | 7.23a | 3.62a | |
M4 | 7.75b | 8.51b | 11.00b | 6.20b | 2.74b | |
均值 | 7.04 | 8.5 | 11.02 | 6.4 | 2.62 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 5.07* | 27.80** | 32.66** | 6.11* | 22.86** |
M | 2.27ns | 5.89* | 28.81** | 4.31Ns | 20.66** | |
W×M | 134.73** | 34.50** | 134.65** | 43.02** | 201.73** |
Table 3 Effects of different irrigation volume and density on the Tr of membrane-free cotton [mmol H 2 O/(m2·s)]
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 4.05d | 7.13d | 8.23d | 4.24c | 1.08d |
M2 | 5.62c | 8.01c | 9.62c | 5.90b | 2.75c | |
M3 | 8.11a | 9.26a | 11.31b | 6.76a | 3.38a | |
M4 | 6.31b | 8.30b | 10.35a | 6.11b | 2.04b | |
均值 | 6.02 | 8.18 | 9.88 | 5.75 | 2.31 | |
W2 | M1 | 6.43b | 8.16b | 9.70c | 6.26b | 2.67d |
M2 | 7.83a | 8.5 | 12.54b | 6.43b | 3.35c | |
M3 | 7.58a | 10.64a | 13.87a | 8.38a | 4.52a | |
M4 | 6.70b | 8.95c | 13.40a | 6.53b | 3.95b | |
均值 | 7.14 | 9.08 | 12.38 | 6.9 | 3.62 | |
W3 | M1 | 5.80d | 6.78c | 9.04a | 6.31b | 1.66d |
M2 | 6.24c | 8.23b | 11.27b | 5.84b | 2.45c | |
M3 | 8.36a | 10.47a | 12.78a | 7.23a | 3.62a | |
M4 | 7.75b | 8.51b | 11.00b | 6.20b | 2.74b | |
均值 | 7.04 | 8.5 | 11.02 | 6.4 | 2.62 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 5.07* | 27.80** | 32.66** | 6.11* | 22.86** |
M | 2.27ns | 5.89* | 28.81** | 4.31Ns | 20.66** | |
W×M | 134.73** | 34.50** | 134.65** | 43.02** | 201.73** |
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 333.29a | 243.26a | 207.32a | 211.07a | 274.72a |
M2 | 321.23a | 232.63b | 168.73b | 196.17b | 257.47b | |
M3 | 303.30b | 189.76c | 154.8 | 179.67c | 248.84b | |
M4 | 297.34b | 172.08d | 141.39c | 165.20d | 210.56c | |
均值 | 313.79 | 209.43 | 168.06 | 188.03 | 247.90 | |
W2 | M1 | 343.67a | 232.85a | 191.31a | 194.40a | 248.86a |
M2 | 332.17a | 212.09b | 134.90b | 181.23b | 225.90a | |
M3 | 311.41b | 164.42c | 123.05b | 179.30b | 214.77a | |
M4 | 290.05c | 160.54d | 117.97b | 154.87c | 199.03a | |
均值 | 319.33 | 192.48 | 141.81 | 177.45 | 222.14 | |
W3 | M1 | 340.08a | 239.00a | 167.14a | 190.60a | 265.56a |
M2 | 338.60a | 223.33a | 154.1 | 177.73b | 240.4 | |
M3 | 327.22a | 168.30b | 137.8 | 162.87c | 222.93b | |
M4 | 292.19b | 153.86b | 126.41b | 159.73c | 204.76b | |
均值 | 324.52 | 196.12 | 146.39 | 172.73 | 233.43 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 27.63** | 121.46** | 21.68** | 54.09** | 1.10ns |
M | 17.29* | 4.07ns | 17.04* | 29.58** | 0.63ns | |
W×M | 10.93** | 27.05** | 13.06** | 26.51** | 0.55ns |
Table 4 Effects of different irrigation water and density on the Ci of membrane-free cotton cells (μmolCO2/mol)
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 初蕾期 Primary bud stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Peak flowering stage | 铃期 Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 333.29a | 243.26a | 207.32a | 211.07a | 274.72a |
M2 | 321.23a | 232.63b | 168.73b | 196.17b | 257.47b | |
M3 | 303.30b | 189.76c | 154.8 | 179.67c | 248.84b | |
M4 | 297.34b | 172.08d | 141.39c | 165.20d | 210.56c | |
均值 | 313.79 | 209.43 | 168.06 | 188.03 | 247.90 | |
W2 | M1 | 343.67a | 232.85a | 191.31a | 194.40a | 248.86a |
M2 | 332.17a | 212.09b | 134.90b | 181.23b | 225.90a | |
M3 | 311.41b | 164.42c | 123.05b | 179.30b | 214.77a | |
M4 | 290.05c | 160.54d | 117.97b | 154.87c | 199.03a | |
均值 | 319.33 | 192.48 | 141.81 | 177.45 | 222.14 | |
W3 | M1 | 340.08a | 239.00a | 167.14a | 190.60a | 265.56a |
M2 | 338.60a | 223.33a | 154.1 | 177.73b | 240.4 | |
M3 | 327.22a | 168.30b | 137.8 | 162.87c | 222.93b | |
M4 | 292.19b | 153.86b | 126.41b | 159.73c | 204.76b | |
均值 | 324.52 | 196.12 | 146.39 | 172.73 | 233.43 | |
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||
F | W | 27.63** | 121.46** | 21.68** | 54.09** | 1.10ns |
M | 17.29* | 4.07ns | 17.04* | 29.58** | 0.63ns | |
W×M | 10.93** | 27.05** | 13.06** | 26.51** | 0.55ns |
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 单株铃数 Bolls per plant (个/株) | 收获株数 Harvest plant number (104/hm2) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 4.01c | 2.91c | 23.38a | 2 731.35d | |||||
M2 | 4.29b | 3.94b | 21.04b | 3 549.18c | ||||||
M3 | 5.05a | 4.26a | 19.36c | 4 164.55a | ||||||
M4 | 5.12a | 4.38a | 16.87d | 3 779.82b | ||||||
均值 | 4.62 | 3.87 | 20.16 | 3 556.23 | ||||||
W2 | M1 | 4.46b | 6.13c | 23.28a | 6 356.19c | |||||
M2 | 4.8 | 6.90b | 20.65b | 6 836.84b | ||||||
M3 | 5.09a | 7.59a | 19.41b | 7 496.79a | ||||||
M4 | 5.26a | 7.88a | 16.68c | 6 913.66b | ||||||
均值 | 4.90 | 7.13 | 20.01 | 6 900.87 | ||||||
W3 | M1 | 4.18b | 6.13c | 23.16a | 5 932.68c | |||||
M2 | 4.5 | 6.76b | 21.10b | 6 541.62b | ||||||
M3 | 4.99a | 7.10a | 19.44b | 6 890.71a | ||||||
M4 | 4.83b | 7.29a | 17.54c | 6 178.65c | ||||||
均值 | 4.65 | 6.82 | 20.31 | 6 385.92 | ||||||
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||||||
F | W | 2.76ns | 362.11** | 1.84ns | 1 053.15** | |||||
M | 48.85** | 68.07** | 15.76** | 52.17** | ||||||
W×M | 11.51** | 175.62** | 27.38** | 390.14** |
Table 5 Effects of water volume and density on yield and its composition
灌水量 Irrigation amount | 密度 Density | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 单株铃数 Bolls per plant (个/株) | 收获株数 Harvest plant number (104/hm2) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | M1 | 4.01c | 2.91c | 23.38a | 2 731.35d | |||||
M2 | 4.29b | 3.94b | 21.04b | 3 549.18c | ||||||
M3 | 5.05a | 4.26a | 19.36c | 4 164.55a | ||||||
M4 | 5.12a | 4.38a | 16.87d | 3 779.82b | ||||||
均值 | 4.62 | 3.87 | 20.16 | 3 556.23 | ||||||
W2 | M1 | 4.46b | 6.13c | 23.28a | 6 356.19c | |||||
M2 | 4.8 | 6.90b | 20.65b | 6 836.84b | ||||||
M3 | 5.09a | 7.59a | 19.41b | 7 496.79a | ||||||
M4 | 5.26a | 7.88a | 16.68c | 6 913.66b | ||||||
均值 | 4.90 | 7.13 | 20.01 | 6 900.87 | ||||||
W3 | M1 | 4.18b | 6.13c | 23.16a | 5 932.68c | |||||
M2 | 4.5 | 6.76b | 21.10b | 6 541.62b | ||||||
M3 | 4.99a | 7.10a | 19.44b | 6 890.71a | ||||||
M4 | 4.83b | 7.29a | 17.54c | 6 178.65c | ||||||
均值 | 4.65 | 6.82 | 20.31 | 6 385.92 | ||||||
ANOVA检验F值 F value of ANOVA | ||||||||||
F | W | 2.76ns | 362.11** | 1.84ns | 1 053.15** | |||||
M | 48.85** | 68.07** | 15.76** | 52.17** | ||||||
W×M | 11.51** | 175.62** | 27.38** | 390.14** |
[1] | 董合干. 地膜残留对棉花产量影响的极限研究[D]. 石河子:石河子大学, 2013. |
DONG Hegan. The limit effect of film residue on cotton yields[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2013. | |
[2] | 喻树迅. 无膜棉对中国棉花产业转型升级的意义[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(3):1-5. |
YU Shuxun. The Significance of filmless cotton to promote the transformation and upgrading of China's cotton industry[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(3):1-5. | |
[3] | 李志刚, 叶含春, 肖让. 不同灌水量对棉花光合特性的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(22):14-17,29. |
LI Zhigang, YE Hanchun, XIAO Rang. Influence of different irrigation water on photosynthetic characteristics of cotton[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Science, 2013, 40(22):14-17,29. | |
[4] | Cowling S A, Field C B. Environmental control of leaf area production: Implications for vegetation and land-surface modeling[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2003, 17(1):7-14. |
[5] | Drewry D T, Kumar P, Long S, et al. Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability:1.Inter play between vertical structure and photosynthetic pathway[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 2010, 115(G4) :985-989. |
[6] | Drewry D T, Kumar P, Long S, et al. Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 2.Role of acclimation under elevated CO2[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 2010, 115(G4):6291-6297. |
[7] | 王瑞. 花铃期持续土壤干旱影响棉花产量品质形成的生理生态机制研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2016. |
WANG Rui. Ecological and physiological responses of cotton to drought during flowering and boll-forming period[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agriculture University, 2016 | |
[8] | 张东升, 韩硕, 王旗, 等. 枣棉间作条件下棉花密度对棉花光合特性及产量影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(4):334-341. |
ZHANG Dongsheng, HAN Shuo, WANG Qi, et al. Effect of plant density on photosynjournal characters and yield of cotton in the jujube-cotton intercropping systems[J]. Cotton Science, 2014, 26(4):334-341. | |
[9] | 王孝刚, 张教海, 夏松波, 等. 密度对麦后直播棉生育特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(2):222-224,241. |
WANG Xiaogang, ZHANG Jiaohai, XIA Songbo, et al. The effect of density on growth characteristics and yield and quality in field seeding cotton after wheat[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 56(2):222-224,241. | |
[10] | 牛媛, 杨相昆, 张占琴, 等. 揭膜种植方式下不同灌水量对棉花光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(16):82-88. |
NIU Yuan, YANG Xiangkun, ZHANG Zhanqing, et al. Effects of different irrigation amount on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton under planting method of uncovering plastic film[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(16):82-88. | |
[11] | 王冀川, 马富裕, 冯胜利, 等. 加工番茄叶面积指数动态的知识模型研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 26(1):35-40. |
WANG Jichuan, MA Fuyu, FENG Shengli, et al. Studies on dynamic knowledge model for design of leaf area index in processing tomato[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2008, 26(1):35-40. | |
[12] | 陈云, 刘伟, 胡彦, 等. 紫背天葵光合日变化规律及影响因子分析[J]. 文山学院学报, 2020, 33(3):18-21,36. |
CHEN Yun, LIU Wei, HU Yan, et al. The analysis of diurnal variation and influence factors of photosynjournal of Gynura Bicolor DC[J]. Journal of Wenshan university, 2020, 33(3):18-21,36. | |
[13] |
Jiang J, Huo Z L, Feng S Y, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation with saline water on spring wheat growth and yield in arid Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2013, 5(2):143-154.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Bouthiba A, Debaeke P, Hamoudi S A. Varietal differences in the response of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.var.durum) to irrigation strategies in a semi-arid region of Algeria[J]. Irrigation Science, 2008, 26(3):239-251.
DOI URL |
[15] | 郭增江, 于振文, 石玉, 等. 不同土层测墒补灌对小麦旗叶光合特性和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(4):731-738. |
GUO Zhenjiang, YU Zhenwen, SHI Yu, et al. Photosynjournal characteristics of flag leaf and dry matter accumulation and allocation in winter wheat under supplemental irrigation after measuring moisture content in different soil layers[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(4):731-738. | |
[16] |
张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 等. 种植密度对新疆高产棉花群体光合作用、冠层结构及产量形成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(2):164-171.
DOI |
ZHANG Wangfeng, WANG Zhenling, YU Songlie, et al. Effect of planting density on canopy photosynjournal, canopy structure and yield formation of high-yield cotton groups in Xinjiang China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2004, 28(2):164-171.
DOI |
|
[17] | 牛玉萍, 陈宗奎, 陈厚川, 等. 不同滴灌模式下种植密度对棉花冠层结构特性的调节[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(10):1765-1777. |
NIU Yuping, CHEN Zhongkui, CHEN Houchuan, et al. Effect of planting density on canopy structure characteristics of cotton under different drip irrigation patterns[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(10):1765-1777. | |
[18] | 陈立宇, 张立峰, 路战远, 等. 痕量灌溉对棉花花铃期光合性能日变化及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(4):9-16. |
CHEN Liyu, ZHANG Lifeng, LU Zhanyuan, et al. The effects of trace irrigation on the yield and daily change of photosynjournal during flowering and boll stage of cotton[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(4):9-16. | |
[19] | 辛明华, 王占彪, 李小飞, 等. 南疆棉区机采种植模式下棉花种植密度研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(1):46-52. |
XIN Minghua, WANG Zhanbiao, LI Xiaofei, et al. Study on suitable planting density of cotton under machine-picked planting mode in South Xinjiang[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(1):46-52. | |
[20] |
Ennahli S, Earl H J. Physiological limitations to photosynthetic carbon assimilation in cotton under water stress[J]. Crop Science, 2005, 45(6):2374-2382.
DOI URL |
[21] | 段鹏飞, 赵地. 密度对棉花主茎叶衰老特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2017, 40(5):12-17. |
DUAN Pengfei, ZHAO Di. Effect of density on leaf senescence, yield and quality of cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Heibei, 2017, 40(5):12-17. | |
[22] |
冯克云, 王宁, 南宏宇, 等. 水分亏缺下化肥减量配施有机肥对棉花光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1):125-137.
DOI |
FENG Keyun, WANG Ning, NAN Hongyu, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer application under water deficit on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1):125-137.
DOI |
|
[23] |
杜刚锋, 汪江涛, 孙雪冰, 等. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7):1177-1186.
DOI |
DU Gangfeng, WANG Jiangtao, SUN Xuebing, et al. Effects of irrigation method and irrigation amount on cotton crown leaf boll configuration[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(7):1177-1186.
DOI |
|
[24] | 刘素华, 彭延, 彭小峰, 等. 调亏灌溉与合理密植对旱区棉花生长发育及产量与品质的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(2):184-188. |
LIU Shuhua, PENG Yan, PENG Xiaofeng, et al. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation and plant density on plant growth and yield and fiber quality of cotton in dry land area[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(2):184-188. | |
[25] |
马卉, 牛玉萍, 夏军, 等. 滴灌模式和种植密度对棉花叶片衰老特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(11):1972-1982.
DOI |
MA Hui, NIU Yuping, XIA Jun, et al. Effect of drip irrigation pattern and planting density on leaf senescence of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(11):1972-1982.
DOI |
|
[26] | 王洪博, 曹辉, 高阳, 等. 南疆无膜滴灌棉花灌溉制度对土壤水分和产量品质的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(5):26-34. |
WANG Hongbo, CAO Hui, GAO Yang, et al. The effects of drip-irrigation scheduling without mulching on soil moisture, yield and quality of cotton in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(5):26-34. |
[1] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[2] | Areziguli Tuxun, GAO Jie. Effects of drought stress and planting density on physiological characteristics and yield of onion bulblets [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2211-2222. |
[3] | Paziliye Ahemati, WANG Xinyong, ZHOU Yan, SONG Bin, Yusuf Abulitifu. Effects of microbial inoculants on physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of walnut leaves [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2299-2306. |
[4] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[5] | LI Suocheng, LIU Yantao, DONG Hongye, SUN Zhenbo, LI Ziwei, ZHANG Chunyuan, WANG Kaiyong, LI Qiang, YANG Mingfeng. Effects of potassium nutrition on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1926-1936. |
[6] | Arezigu Tuxun, JIA Kai, GAO Jie. Effects of different substrates and planting densities on onion bulblet yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1993-2003. |
[7] | MEI Chuang, FENG Beibei, MA Liya, ZHANG Zhenjun, ZHANG Jinshan, MA Yanhong, WANG Jixun, YAN Peng. Effects of density transformation on microenvironment and spectral characteristics of Fuji orchards in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1682-1688. |
[8] | DONG Zhenlin, WAN Sumei, XIONG Shiwu, MA Yunzhen, MAO Tingyong, YANG Beifang, LUO Lei, LIU Chaoqun, CHEN Guodong, LI Yabing. Effects of different planting densities on agronomic traits and yield of Zhongmian 113 [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1102-1111. |
[9] | LIU Chaoqun, DONG Helin, WAN Sumei, ZHENG Cangsong, LUO Lei, MA Yunzhen, DONG Zhenlin, CHEN Guodong, LI Pengcheng. Study on suitable planting density of cotton with different row spacing configurations in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1112-1121. |
[10] | ZHANG Yijia, CHENG Ping, WANG Lei, WU Sheng li. Effects of different irrigation rates on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of dwarfed close-planted apple trees [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1140-1150. |
[11] | SONG Xianming, HOU Xianfei, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang, GUO Meili, ZENG Youling, JIA Donghia. Effects of planting density and row spacing on growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 804-813. |
[12] | ZHANG Junyao, WANG Jiayong, TANG Jianghua, LOU Shanwei, LI Wenshan, XU Wenxiu, MENG Lingyi, HE Hongtao, SANG Junmin. Effect of sowing period and density on growth and development and yield of Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 547-555. |
[13] | WU Gang, TIAN Yangqing, ZHAO Qiang, LI Xinxin, Munire Abudulaini, ZHANG Jiahao, WANG Wenqing, ZHAN Dongxia, MA Chunmei. Influence of different promoters compounded with DPC on the spatial and temporal distribution of cotton boll and yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 279-287. |
[14] | MAO Tingyong, LIU Chan, YANG Beifang, LI Yabing, ZHOU Yun, WANG Dong, CHEN Guodong, WAN Sumei. Response characteristics of source and sink organs of drip irrigation cotton to chemical topping [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 288-299. |
[15] | LIU Huifang, WANG Qiang, HAN Hongwei, ZHUANG Hongmei, WANG Hao, CHANG Yanan. Effects of salt, alkali and complex salt alkali stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activity of tomato seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2658-2666. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 77
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 148
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||