Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 410-416.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.02.018
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Forestry·Soil Fertilizer· Water Saving Irrigation·Agroecological Environment • Previous Articles Next Articles
TAN Huilin1,2(), WU Zhonghong3, JIN Yongseng4, NIU Guiyang2, BAO Dongdong2, CHEN Haiyuan2, ZHANG Zhidong1(
)
Received:
2021-01-21
Online:
2022-02-20
Published:
2022-03-22
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Zhidong
Supported by:
谭慧林1,2(), 吴忠红3, 金永生4, 牛贵洋2, 包东东2, 陈海元2, 张志东1(
)
通讯作者:
张志东
作者简介:
谭慧林(1977-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,正高级工程师,研究方向为食品安全检验,(E-mail) 45118707@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
TAN Huilin, WU Zhonghong, JIN Yongseng, NIU Guiyang, BAO Dongdong, CHEN Haiyuan, ZHANG Zhidong. Determination of StaphlococcusAureus in Food and Evaluation of the Fast Kit[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 410-416.
谭慧林, 吴忠红, 金永生, 牛贵洋, 包东东, 陈海元, 张志东. 食品中金黄色葡萄球菌的快速检测及其评估[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 410-416.
样品情况a Sample | 检测结果bResult | 总数 Total | |
---|---|---|---|
阳性Positive | 阴性Negative | ||
阳性Positive | N11 | N12 | N1.=N11+N12 |
阴性Negative | N21 | N22 | N2.=N21+N22 |
总数Total | N.1=N11+N21 | N.2=N12+N22 | N=N1.+N2. |
显著性差异( | 自由度(df)=1 | ||
灵敏度Sensitivity(p+,%) | p+=N11/N1. | ||
特异性Specificity(p-,%) | p-=N22/N2. | ||
假阴性率False negative rate(pf-,% | pf-=N12/N1.=100-灵敏度 | ||
假阳性率False negative rate(pf+,%) | pf+=N21/N2.=100-特异性 | ||
相对准确度Relative accuracy(%c) | (N11+N22)/(N1.+N2.) |
Table 1 The calculation of properties indexes of the rapid detection method
样品情况a Sample | 检测结果bResult | 总数 Total | |
---|---|---|---|
阳性Positive | 阴性Negative | ||
阳性Positive | N11 | N12 | N1.=N11+N12 |
阴性Negative | N21 | N22 | N2.=N21+N22 |
总数Total | N.1=N11+N21 | N.2=N12+N22 | N=N1.+N2. |
显著性差异( | 自由度(df)=1 | ||
灵敏度Sensitivity(p+,%) | p+=N11/N1. | ||
特异性Specificity(p-,%) | p-=N22/N2. | ||
假阴性率False negative rate(pf-,% | pf-=N12/N1.=100-灵敏度 | ||
假阳性率False negative rate(pf+,%) | pf+=N21/N2.=100-特异性 | ||
相对准确度Relative accuracy(%c) | (N11+N22)/(N1.+N2.) |
样品 Sample | 计数 Counting (CFU) | 统计 Statistics (CFU/g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶10 | 1∶100 | ||||
苹果脆片 Apple chips | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
真空包装的 水果玉米 Fruit corns in vacuum packaging | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 35 | |
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 50 | |
5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 45 | |
4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
Table 2 Amount of S.aureus in the samplesby the standard method
样品 Sample | 计数 Counting (CFU) | 统计 Statistics (CFU/g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶10 | 1∶100 | ||||
苹果脆片 Apple chips | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
真空包装的 水果玉米 Fruit corns in vacuum packaging | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 35 | |
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 50 | |
5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 45 | |
4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
样品 Sample | 计数 Counting (CFU) | 统计 Statistics (CFU/g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶10 | 1∶100 | ||||
苹果脆片 Apple chips | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
真空包装 水果玉米 Fruit corns in vacuum packaging | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 40 | |
3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
Table 3 Amount of S.aureus in the samples by the rapid kit
样品 Sample | 计数 Counting (CFU) | 统计 Statistics (CFU/g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶10 | 1∶100 | ||||
苹果脆片 Apple chips | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
真空包装 水果玉米 Fruit corns in vacuum packaging | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 40 | |
3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
样品 Sample | 计数Accounting | 统计 Statistics (CFU/g) | 回收率 Rate of recovery (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶10 | 1∶100 | |||||||
苹果脆片 (加标100 CFU/g) Apple chips (artificial pollution treatments, 100 CFU/g ) | 9 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 93.3 |
8 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
苹果脆片 (加标1 000 CFU/g) Apple chips (artificial pollution treatments, 1,000 CFU/g ) | 97 | 96 | 108 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 1 053 | 102.5 |
107 | 102 | 105 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
Table 4 Average recovery in different spiked levels for S.aureus by the standard method
样品 Sample | 计数Accounting | 统计 Statistics (CFU/g) | 回收率 Rate of recovery (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶10 | 1∶100 | |||||||
苹果脆片 (加标100 CFU/g) Apple chips (artificial pollution treatments, 100 CFU/g ) | 9 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 93.3 |
8 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
苹果脆片 (加标1 000 CFU/g) Apple chips (artificial pollution treatments, 1,000 CFU/g ) | 97 | 96 | 108 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 1 053 | 102.5 |
107 | 102 | 105 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
阴性对照 Negative Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
国标法检测结果 Results by the GB method (CFU/g) | 0 | 26 | 86 | 123 | 862 | 1 053 |
测试片法检测结果 Results by the rapid kit method (CFU/g) | 0 | 20 | 80 | 120 | 810 | 1 140 |
0 | 20 | 90 | 110 | 910 | 1 180 | |
0 | 20 | 80 | 100 | 870 | 1 100 | |
0 | 30 | 80 | 110 | 860 | 1 020 | |
0 | 30 | 80 | 120 | 880 | 1 040 | |
0 | 20 | 90 | 120 | 910 | 1 030 | |
0 | 20 | 80 | 110 | 820 | 1 120 | |
0 | 20 | 90 | 110 | 840 | 1 030 | |
0 | 30 | 90 | 110 | 900 | 1 150 | |
0 | 30 | 80 | 100 | 810 | 1 010 |
Table 5 Comparison of results detectedby the standard method and the rapid kit
阴性对照 Negative Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
国标法检测结果 Results by the GB method (CFU/g) | 0 | 26 | 86 | 123 | 862 | 1 053 |
测试片法检测结果 Results by the rapid kit method (CFU/g) | 0 | 20 | 80 | 120 | 810 | 1 140 |
0 | 20 | 90 | 110 | 910 | 1 180 | |
0 | 20 | 80 | 100 | 870 | 1 100 | |
0 | 30 | 80 | 110 | 860 | 1 020 | |
0 | 30 | 80 | 120 | 880 | 1 040 | |
0 | 20 | 90 | 120 | 910 | 1 030 | |
0 | 20 | 80 | 110 | 820 | 1 120 | |
0 | 20 | 90 | 110 | 840 | 1 030 | |
0 | 30 | 90 | 110 | 900 | 1 150 | |
0 | 30 | 80 | 100 | 810 | 1 010 |
样品实际状态a Sample | 测试片检测结果b Results | 合计Total | |
---|---|---|---|
阳性Postive | 阴性 Negative | ||
阳性Postive(>100 CFU/g) | 28 | 2 | 30 |
阴性Negative(≤100 CFU/g) | 0 | 30 | 30 |
合计 | 30 | 30 | 60 |
评估指标Evaluation indexs | |||
灵敏度 Sensitivity | 特异性 Specificity | 假阴性率 False negative rate | 假阳性率 False negative rate |
93% | 100% | 6.6% | 0% |
Table 6 Estimation and analysis the fast kit for S.aureusdetermination
样品实际状态a Sample | 测试片检测结果b Results | 合计Total | |
---|---|---|---|
阳性Postive | 阴性 Negative | ||
阳性Postive(>100 CFU/g) | 28 | 2 | 30 |
阴性Negative(≤100 CFU/g) | 0 | 30 | 30 |
合计 | 30 | 30 | 60 |
评估指标Evaluation indexs | |||
灵敏度 Sensitivity | 特异性 Specificity | 假阴性率 False negative rate | 假阳性率 False negative rate |
93% | 100% | 6.6% | 0% |
[1] | 周莉, 王永, 王法云, 等. 食品中金黄色葡萄球菌概况及新型检测技术研究进展[J]. 中国酿造, 2016, 35(2):1-4. |
ZHOU Li, WANG Yong, WANG Fayun, et al. Recent advance of general situation and novel detection technologies of Staphylococcus aureus in food[J]. China Brewing, 2016, 35(2):1-4. | |
[2] | 李琼琼, 范一灵, 宋明辉, 等. 食源性金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素及其检测方法[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2016, 7(2):555-560. |
LI Qiongqiong, FAN Yili, SONG Minghui, et al. Research advances on foodborne Staphylococcal enterotoxins and its detection methods[J]. Food Safety and Quality Detection Technology, 2016, 7(2):555-560. | |
[3] |
Necidova L, Bogdanovicova K, Harustiakova D, et al. Short communication: Pasteurization as a means of inactivating staphylococcal enterotoxin A, B, and C in milk[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(11):8638-8643.
DOI PMID |
[4] | Cheng K, Wang S, Xu Y. Different roles of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin in different subtypes of nasal polyps[J]. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2017, (13):321-326. |
[5] | 李毅. 金黄色葡萄球菌及其肠毒素研究进展[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2004, 14(4):392-395. |
LI Yi. Research advances on foodborne staphylococcal enterotoxins and its detection methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene, 2004, 14(4):392-395. | |
[6] | GB 4789.10-2010,食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验金黄色葡萄球菌检验[S]. |
GB 4789.10-2010.National food safety standard for Food microbiological examination: Staphylococcus aureus[S]. | |
[7] | 孙葳, 赵虹, 王伟杰. 食品金黄色葡萄球菌检测方法探究[J]. 现代食品, 2017,(13):37-39. |
SUN Wei, ZHAO Hong, WANG Weijie. Study on the Detection Method of Staphylococcus aureus in Food[J]. Modern Food, 2017,(13):37-39. | |
[8] | Chariya C, Yingrit C, Sugunya S, et al. Enteropathogenic bacteria and enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ready-to-eat foods in Khon Kaen, Thailand[J]. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 2006, 37(5):983-990. |
[9] |
Jampasa S, Wonsawat W, Rodthongkum N, et al. Electrochemical detection of human papillomavirus DNA type 16 using a pyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acid probe immobilized on screen-printed carbon electrodes[J]. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2014, 54(12):428-434.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Fu S, Cheng J, Wei C, et al. Development of diagnostic SCAR markers for genomic DNAamplifications in breast carcinoma by DNA cloning of high-GC RAMP-PCR fragments[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(27):43866-43877.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Duarte C M, Carneiro C, Cardoso S, et al. Semi-quantitative method for Staphylococci magneticdetection in raw milk[J]. Journal of Dairy Research, 2017, 84(1):80-88.
DOI URL |
[12] | 李雪晶, 富莉静, 薛志清, 等. 单测试片法定性快速检测乳中金黄色葡萄球菌的研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2019, 10(24):8519-8524. |
LI Xuejing, FU Lijing, XUE Zhiqing, et al. Rapid qualitative detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk by single test method[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2019, 10(24):8519-8524. | |
[13] | 贾景建, 张新伟, 马蒙. 酶底物法快速测定食品中金黄色葡萄球菌[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(20):5360-5364. |
JIA Jingjian, ZHANG Xinwei, MA Meng. Rapid determination of Staphylococcus aureus in food by enzyme substrate technique[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2018, 9(20):5360-5364. | |
[14] | 林舒. 浅淡3M纸片法检测食品中金黄色葡萄球菌[J]. 医学信息, 2010, 23(6):23-24. |
LIN Shu. Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus in food by 3M paper method[J]. Medical Information, 2010, 23(6):23-24. | |
[15] | Lei Z W, Food microbiology laboratory quality management handbook [M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006. |
[16] | 国家食品药品监督管理局. 食药监办科[2017]43 号总局办公厅关于印发食品快速检测方法评价技术规范的通知[EB/OL].(2017-03-31) [2019-07-14]. http://samr.cfda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1605/171311.html. |
China Food and Drug Administration. Food and Drug Administration Branch.General Office 43 about Circular on printing and distributing evaluation the technical specifications for food safety rapid detection.[EB/OL].(2017-03-31) [2019-07-14]. http://samr.cfda.gov.cn/WS01/CL1605/171311.html. | |
[17] | GB 29921-2003,《食品安全国家标准食品中致病菌限量》[S]. |
GB 29921-2003, National food safety standard Food microbiological Limit of pathogenic bacteria in food[S]. | |
[18] | Sandt C H, Krouse D A, Cook C R, et al. The key role of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in investigation of a large multiserotype and multistate food-borne outbreak of Salmonella infection centered in Pennsylvania[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006, 44:3208-3212. |
[19] |
Fischbach MA, Walsh CT. Antibiotics for emerging pathogens[J]. Science, 2009, 325(5944):1089-1093
DOI PMID |
[20] | SN/T 3266-2012,《食品微生物检验方法确认技术规范》[S]. |
SN/T 3266-2012, Technical Specification for validation of microbiological examination methods for food[S]. | |
[21] | 刘培培. 2018年大丰城区菜市场熟食中致病菌检测情况分析[J]. 医学信息, 2020, (1):130-132. |
LIU Peipei. Analysis of pathogenic bacteria in cooked food in Dafeng City in 2018[J]. Medical Information, 2020,(1):130-132. | |
[22] | 宋晓红, 刘晔, 乔玫, 等. 山西省2010~2016年九类食品中金黄色葡萄球菌污染监测[J]. 中国公共卫生管理, 2019,(2):241-244. |
SONG Xiaohong, LIU Ye, QIAO Mei, et al. Surveillance of Staphylococcus aureus contamination in nine food categories in Shanxi Province from 2010 to 2016[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health Management, 2019,(2):241-244. | |
[23] | 侯海燕, 李兵兵, 刘靓, 等. 2015-2016年淮安市食品中食源性致病菌监测结果分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2018, 23(6):709-711. |
HOU Haiyan, LI Bingbing, LIU Liang, et al. Surveillance results analysis of food-borne pathogenic bacteria in foods in Huai'an from 2015 to 2016[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2018, 23(6):709-711. | |
[24] | 尹丹韩, 林捷, 方陈玉, 等. 食源性致病菌快速检测仪器现场评价分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(10):2384-2389. |
YIN Danhan, LIN Jie, FANG Chenyu, et al. Analysis on the on-site assessment of foodborne pathogen rapid detection equipments[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2018, 9(10):2384-2389. |
[1] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[2] | ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
[3] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[4] | CHEN Yong, ZHOU Lei, SUI Chun, LIN Caixia. The characteristics of 32 cultivated germplasms of Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus in Xinjiang production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
[5] | LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
[6] | Abudukadier Kurban, PAN Jinghai, CHEN Youqiang, LIU Huajun, DONG Xinjiu, BAI Xiaoshan, LI Sizhong, GAO Weishi, LI Xiaohui. Comprehensive evaluation of adaptability of late sowing sugar-beet varieties based on yield correlation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1368-1377. |
[7] | YANG Junyan, YAN Miao, WU Haibo, YANG Wenli, WANG Haojie, MAO Jiancai, ZHAI Wenqiang, LI Junhua. The impact of high temperature on different thick -skinned melon varieties and comprehensive evaluation of its heat resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396. |
[8] | ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844. |
[9] | QIAN Tao, WU Lili, LI Lei, Anniwaer Kuerban, DING Ruifeng. Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 861-868. |
[10] | ZHANG Jiatuo, SONG Zhanteng, Maerhaba Paerhati, LI Jing, WANG Hui, ZHANG Ruili, ZHU Jingrong. Nutritional quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of different chamagu(Brassica rapa L.) varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 926-936. |
[11] | WEI Yang, CHEN Guoxiang, Adili Sattar, Mahamatopiti Tusun, TIAN Guangyu. Indoor toxicity determination and field efficacy trials of several pesticides against Grapholita molesta in walnut production areas of Hotan County [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 665-671. |
[12] | BAO Yanli, SU Wuzheng, ZHANG Lizhao, LI Qiongshi. Analysis regional difference of green agriculture development level in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 773-780. |
[13] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, Dawulai Jiekeshan, Buayixiamu Namanti, LIU Qi, Aierjuma Tuluhan, PENG Yuncheng. Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 318-325. |
[14] | OU Yuan, LUO Shasha, WANG Ruyue, SUN Yali, HU Haifang. Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of american black walnut seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 393-401. |
[15] | LIU Zhenya, SU Xuanle, TANG Li, JIANG Siming, LI Yapeng, DAN Hongxia, ZHANG Wangbin. Toxicity determination of Twenty-two antibiotics against oear fire blight and its safety evaluation on floral organ [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 461-468. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 42
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 177
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||