Effects of different ground mulch types on the berry quality of Marselan wine grape and comprehensive evaluation

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.05.011

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To study the effects of different ground mulching types on the berry quality of wine grape Marselan.【Methods】Five-year old grafted Marselan/SO4 was taken as test materials, clean tillage one as the control to study the effects of inter-row spaces of the vineyard covered with black geotextiles (BGM) and inter-row spaces of the vineyard with natural growing grass (GM) on Marselan grape quality.【Results】The results showed that cluster weight, berry weight, longitudinal diameter and transverse diameter were increased by ground mulch.Wilting percent of BGM was the highest, with 5.45%, juice yield was the lowest (32.89%), there was no wilting percent for GM, juice yield was significant higher for GM than CK.Soluble solid and reducing sugar content were decreased for BGM and increased fur GM.BGM and GM decreased titratable acid and pH, but increased sugar/acid.Total phenol, flavonoids, flavanols and tannins content in fruit peel were significantly increased for BGM and GM, anthocyanins content in peel were changed, but there was no difference.FRAP and ABTS antioxidant activity for BGM and GM were increased, but DPPH antioxidant activity for BGM and GM were significantly decreased.The correlation analysis of 26 berry quality indexes showed that there were significant positive or negative correlations, with correlation coefficients ranging from -1.00 to +1.00.【Conclusion】In turpan, grass mulch can be selected as a new model of wine grape cultivation.

Key words: wine grape; ground mulch types; berry quality; antioxidant capacity

摘要：

【目的】研究不同地面覆盖方式对酿酒葡萄品种马瑟兰果实品质的影响。【方法】以5年生SO4砧木嫁接的酿酒葡萄品种马瑟兰为试材,以清耕栽培为对照,研究行间铺设园艺地布(BGM)和生草栽培(GM)2种地面覆盖方式对马瑟兰果实品质的影响。【结果】园艺地布和生草栽培均可以提高葡萄果穗质量、果粒质量和果粒纵横径。园艺地布的葡萄萎蔫率最高为5.45%,出汁率最低为32.89%,生草栽培未出现葡萄萎蔫现象,其出汁率显著高于对照。园艺地布降低了葡萄果实可溶性固形物和还原糖含量,生草栽培提高了葡萄可溶性固形物和还原糖含量。园艺地布和生草栽培均可降低葡萄果实可滴定酸和pH值,提高糖酸比。园艺地布和生草均显著提高了葡萄果皮总酚、类黄酮、黄烷醇和单宁含量,虽然园艺地布和生草改变了葡萄花色苷含量,但和对照间均无差异性。2种地面覆盖方式可提高葡萄果皮FRAP和ABTS的抗氧化活性,但显著降低了DPPH的抗氧化活性。26个葡萄品质指标之间存在不同程度的极显著获显著性正相关或负相关,相关系数介于-1.00~+1.00。【结论】在新疆吐鲁番市可选择生草栽培作为酿酒葡萄优质栽培新模式。

关键词: 酿酒葡萄, 地面覆盖, 果实品质, 抗氧化活性

CLC Number:

S663.1

HU Jinge, BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, CAI Junshe. Effects of different ground mulch types on the berry quality of Marselan wine grape and comprehensive evaluation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1131-1139.

户金鸽, 白世践, 陈光, 蔡军社. 不同地面覆盖方式对酿酒葡萄品种马瑟兰果实品质的影响及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1131-1139.

Figures/Tables 5

References 51

[1]	赵德英. 梨园树盘覆盖的土壤生态效应及树体生理响应研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
	ZHAO Deying. Study on the soil ecological effects and physiological response in different groundcover pear tree[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013.
[2]	李寒, 郝赛鹏, 郭素萍, 等. 地布覆盖对苹果园土壤水热环境及果实品质的影响[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2019, (10): 44-47.
	LI Han, HAO Saipeng, GUO Suping, et al. Effects of ground cloth mulching on soil water and heat environment and fruit quality in apple orchard[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2019, (10): 44-47.
[3]	杨熠路, 胡枫, 倪照君, 等. 园艺地布覆盖对桃园土壤和桃果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2021, (8): 24-30.
	YANG Yilu, HU Feng, NI Zhaojun, et al. Effects of black ground fabric mulching on fruit quality and soil in peach orchard[J]. China Fruits, 2021, (8): 24-30.
[4]	郑悦, 李会科, 张泰然, 等. 园艺地布微垄覆盖对渭北旱地矮化苹果根域土壤水分的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(4): 631-640.
	ZHENG Yue, LI Huike, ZHANG Tairan, et al. Effects of black ground fabric micro-ridge mulching on root zone soil moisture of dwarf apple in Weibei dryland, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(4): 631-640.
[5]	赵思明, 曹兵, 万仲武, 等. 园艺地布和秸秆覆盖对枣园土壤温湿度与枣树生长的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(5): 1188-1195. DOI
	ZHAO Siming, CAO Bing, WAN Zhongwu, et al. Effect of garden cloth covering and straw mulching on soil temperature, moisture and jujube growth in jujube orchard[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(5): 1188-1195. DOI
[6]	刘伟, 罗玲, 钟奇, 等. 生草和地布覆盖对攀枝花地区芒果园土壤性质及果实品质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2): 261-270.
	LIU Wei, LUO Ling, ZHONG Qi, et al. Effects of grass planting and ground fabric mulching on soil properties and fruit quality in mango orchards in Panzhihua, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(2): 261-270.
[7]	姚胜蕊, 薛炳烨. 果园地面管理研究进展[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 30(2): 186-192.
	YAO Shengrui, XUE Bingye. A review of orchard floor management[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 1999, 30(2): 186-192.
[8]	王锐, 闫鹏科, 马婷慧, 等. 行内生草对土壤微环境和酿酒葡萄品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(3): 195-203.
	WANG Rui, YAN Pengke, MA Tinghui, et al. Effects of intra-row planted grass on soil microenvironment and wine grape quality[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(3): 195-203.
[9]	孙计平, 张玉星, 吴照辉, 等. 生草对梨园土壤物理特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(5): 194-199.
	SUN Jiping, ZHANG Yuxing, WU Zhaohui, et al. Effect of planting herbage on soil physical properties of pear orchard[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(5): 194-199.
[10]	霍姗姗. 生草对梨园生态环境及果实品质的影响[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2018.
	HUO Shanshan. Effects of Grass Planting on Ecological Environment and Fruit Quality of Pear Orchard[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2018.
[11]	庞群虎, 宋丽华, 王竞, 等. 生草当年对枣园土壤性状及红枣品质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(1): 124-129.
	PANG Qunhu, SONG Lihua, WANG Jing, et al. Effects of growing grasses in jujube orchards on soil properties and fruit quality[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(1): 124-129.
[12]	陈久红, 马建江, 李永丰, 等. 行间生草对‘库尔勒香梨’果园小气候、光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(22): 49-59.
	CHEN Jiuhong, MA Jianjiang, LI Yongfeng, et al. Effects of herbage on ecological environment and photosynthetic characteristics fruits quality of ‘korla fragrant pear’[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019(22): 49-59.
[13]	段卫朋. 行内生草、覆布对‘赤霞珠’果实及其葡萄酒香气品质的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018.
	DUAN Weipeng. Effects of grass and film cover on aroma quality of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape and wine[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018.
[14]	史进. 自然生草对长富2号果园生态环境和果实品质的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016.
	SHI Jin. Effects of nature grass on ecological environment and fruit quality on Malus pumila ‘Nagafu 2’ orchard[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016.
[15]	Alcalde-Eon C, Boido E, Carrau F, et al. Pigment profiles in monovarietal wines produced in Uruguay[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2006, 57(4): 449-459.
[16]	Li M M, Guo Z J, Jia N, et al. Evaluation of eight rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of ‘Marselan’ grapevines[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 248: 58-61.
[17]	Kym A. JANCIS ROBINSON, JULIA HARDING and JOSÉ VOUILLAMOZ: wine grapes: a complete guide to 1, 368 vine varieties, including their origins and flavours. ecco (harper collins), New York, October 2012, xxxvii + 1242 pp., ISBN 978-0062206367 (hardback), US$175[J]. Journal of Wine Economics, 2013, 8(1): 106-109.
[18]	Carreño J, Martínez A, Almela L, et al. Proposal of an index for the objective evaluation of the colour of red table grapes[J]. Food Research International, 1995, 28(4): 373-377.
[19]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
	GAO Junfeng. Experimental guidance for plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
[20]	Stojanovic J, Silva J L. Influence of osmotic concentration, continuous high frequency ultrasound and dehydration on antioxidants, colour and chemical properties of rabbiteye blueberries[J]. Food Chemistry, 2007, 101(3): 898-906.
[21]	Tian S, Wang Y, Du G, et al. Changes in contents and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds during gibberellin-induced development in Vitis vinifera L. ‘Muscat’[J]. Acta Physiol Plant, 2011, 33:2467-2475.
[22]	Wolfe K, Wu X Z, Liu R H. Antioxidant activity of apple peels[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51(3): 609-614. DOI PMID
[23]	Li Y G, Tanner G, Larkin P. The DMACA-HCl protocol and the threshold proanthocyanidin content for bloat safety in forage legumes[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1996, 70(1): 89-101.
[24]	Mercurio M D, Dambergs R G, Herderich M J, et al. High throughout analysis of red wine and grape phenolics-adaptation and validation of methyl cellulose precipitable tannin assay and modified somers color assay to a rapid 96 well plate format[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2007, 55(12): 4651-5657. PMID
[25]	Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier M, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity[J]. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 1995, 28(1): 25-30.
[26]	Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, et al. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay[J]. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 1999, 26(9/10): 1231-1237.
[27]	Benzie I F F, Strain J J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1996, 239(1): 70-76. DOI PMID
[28]	颜晓捷, 黄坚钦, 邱智敏, 等. 生草栽培对杨梅果园土壤理化性质和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6): 850-854.
	YAN Xiaojie, HUANG Jianqin, QIU Zhimin, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties and fruit quality with grass cover in a Myrica rubra orchard[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2011, 28(6): 850-854.
[29]	刘蝴蝶, 郝淑英, 曹琴, 等. 生草覆盖对果园土壤养分、果实产量及品质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2003, 34(3):184-186.
	LIU Hudie, HAO Shuying, CAO Qin, et al. Effect of grass cover on soil nutrient and yield and quality of apple[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2003, 34(3): 184-186.
[30]	李祥彬. 生草对蜜柚园生态环境及果树生长发育的影响[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017.
	LI Xiangbin. The Influences of Cover Cropping on the Eco-environments in Pummelo Orchard and the Growth & Development of Fruit Trees[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2017.
[31]	王孝娣, 史祥宾, 刘凤之, 等. 不同草种和生草方式对‘春雪’桃果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2017,(2): 28-31.
	WANG Xiaodi, SHI Xiangbin, LIU Fengzhi, et al. Effects of different grass species and grass growing methods on fruit quality of' Chun Xue' peach[J]. China Fruits, 2017,(2): 28-31.
[32]	韩轩轩, 王鹏飞, 穆霄鹏, 等. 地布覆盖下不同垄型对欧李园土壤温湿度与果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2018,(20): 25-32.
	HAN Xuanxuan, WANG Pengfei, MU Xiaopeng, et al. Effects of different ridge shapes with ground cover on soil temperature, humidity and fruit quality of Chinese dwarf cherry[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018, (20): 25-32.
[33]	刘思, 王志磊, 张军翔. 葡萄行内覆盖对园区微域生态环境及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(6): 73-79, 88.
	LIU Si, WANG Zhilei, ZHANG Junxiang. Effects of within-row mulching on soil microsites in vineyard and fruit quality[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(6): 73-79, 88.
[34]	刘博, 黄华梨, 王多锋, 等. 覆盖方式对干热河谷区枣园土壤温度和树体光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(3): 377-385.
	LIU Bo, HUANG Huali, WANG Duofeng, et al. Effect of mulching methods on soil temperature, photosynthetic characteristic and fruit quality of jujube orchard in dry and hot valley[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 377-385.
[35]	管雪强, 孙德勤, 尚明华, 等. 行内生草对酿酒葡萄微域环境及品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(9): 62-65.
	GUAN Xueqiang, SUN Deqin, SHANG Minghua, et al. Effect of grassing beween lines on soil water content, fruit zone temperature and wine grape quality[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(9): 62-65.
[36]	Hu J G, Bai S J, Zhao R H, et al. Effects of black geotextile mulch and grass mulch on the microclimate, fruit quality and anthocyanin components of ‘Xinyu’ table grape[J]. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 2022: 1-18.
[37]	李宏建, 王宏, 于年文, 等. 地面覆盖对苹果树体生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(3): 296-307.
	LI Hongjian, WANG Hong, YU Nianwen, et al. Effects of mulching on the growth and fruit quality of apple trees[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(3): 296-307.
[38]	王波波. 葡萄园行内生草对土壤及植株矿质营养和果实品质的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
	WANG Bobo. Effects of endophytic grass on soil, plant mineral nutrition and fruit quality in vineyards[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021.
[39]	Xi Z M, Zhang Z W, Cheng Y F, et al. The effect of vineyard cover crop on main monomeric phenols of grape berry and wine in Vitis viniferal L.cv.Cabernet sauvignon[J]. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2010, 9(3): 440-448.
[40]	侯婷, 闫鹏科, 庞群虎, 等. 行内覆盖对果园土壤特性及酿酒葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2019, 53(6): 869-875.
	HOU Ting, YAN Pengke, PANG Qunhu, et al. Effects of intra-row coverage on orchard soil features and wine grape yield and quality[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2019, 53(6): 869-875.
[41]	王波波, 王小龙, 史祥宾, 等. 不同行内生草对葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2021,(8): 58-61.
	WANG Bobo, WANG Xiaolong, SHI Xiangbin, et al. Effects of endophytic grass in different rows on grape fruit quality[J]. China Fruits, 2021,(8): 58-61.
[42]	卢浩成, 魏巍, 陈武, 等. 行间种植马齿苋对玛纳斯‘小味儿多’葡萄和葡萄酒风味轮廓的影响[J]. 北方果树, 2023,(1): 5-11.
	LU Haocheng, WEI Wei, CHEN Wu, et al. Effects of inter-row planting purslane on the flavor profiles of ‘petit verdot’ grape and wine in manas[J]. Northern Fruits, 2023,(1): 5-11.
[43]	段鑫垚. 不同行内覆盖处理对葡萄园土壤性质和葡萄果实品质的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
	DUAN Xinyao. Effects of different mulching treatments on soil properties and grape fruit quality in vineyards[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2021.
[44]	庞群虎. 生草覆盖对酿酒葡萄园土壤环境及酿酒葡萄品质的影响研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2019.
	PANG Qunhu. Effects of grass covering on the soil environment of winemaking vineyards and the quality of wine grapes[D]. Yinchuang: Ningxia University, 2019.
[45]	惠竹梅, 张振文, 成宇峰, 等. 行间生草对赤霞珠葡萄与葡萄酒中主要单体酚的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(9): 3209-3215. DOI
	XI Zhumei, ZHANG Zhenwen, CHENG Yufeng, et al. Effect of vineyard cover crop on main monomeric phenols of grape berry and wine in Vitis viniferal L.cv.Cabernet sauvignon[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(9): 3209-3215.
[46]	Monteiro A, Lopes C M. Influence of cover crop on water use and performance of vineyard in Mediterranean Portugal[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007, 121(4): 336-342.
[47]	Spayd S E, Tarara J M, Mee D L, et al. Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis viniferacv. merlot berries[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2002, 53(3): 171-182.
[48]	刘玉娟. 行间生草对 ‘北红’ 葡萄生长微环境和生长发育的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
	LIU Yujuan. Effects of inter row grass on growth microenvironment and growth and development of ‘Beihong’ grape[D]. Yinchuang: Ningxia University, 2022.
[49]	Caspari H W, Neal S, Naylor A, et al. Use of cover crops and deficit irrigation to reduce vegetative vigor of ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ grapevines in a humid climate[C]. Proceeding of the Fourth International Symposium on Cool Climate Viticulture and Enology, 1997: 63-66.
[50]	Flores G, Blanch G P, Ruiz del Castillo M L. Postharvest treatment with (-) and (+)-methyl jasmonate stimulates anthocyanin accumulation in grapes[J]. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 2015, 62(1): 807-812.
[51]	徐洪宇, 张京芳, 成冰, 等. 26种酿酒葡萄中抗氧化物质含量测定及品种分类[J]. 中国食品学报, 2016, 16(2): 233-241.
	XU Hongyu, ZHANG Jingfang, CHENG Bing, et al. Content Determination of the Antioxidant Substance and Classifying the Grape from26 kinds of the Wine Grapes[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2016, 16(2): 233-241.

测定指标 Measurement indexes	对照CK Compare	园艺地布BGM Horticultural ground cloth	生草栽培GM Sod-culture
X₁果穗质量Cluster weight(g)	109.40±45.23 ^b	127.32±20.76 ^b	172.83±61.80^a
X₂紧密度Density	4.67±1.15 ^b	4.33±0.98 ^b	6.17±1.03 ^a
X₃萎蔫率Wilting percent (%)	0.91±2.02 ^b	5.45±6.88^a	0.00±0.00 ^b
X₄出汁率Juice yield(%)	33.42±0.25 ^b	32.89±0.11 ^b	38.29±0.59 ^a
X₅果粒质量Berry weight (g)	0.91±0.09 ^b	0.93±0.04 ^b	1.18±0.05 ^a
X₆果粒纵径Longitudinal diameter(mm)	10.76±0.52 ^c	12.07±0.29 ^b	12.90±0037 ^a
X₇果粒横径Transverse diameter(mm)	10.70±0.42 ^c	11.97±0.44 ^b	12.38±0.32 ^a
X₈果形指数Fruit shape index	1.01±0.04^b	1.01±0.04 ^b	1.04±0.03 ^a
X₉可溶性固形物Soluble solid (°Brix)	24.20±0.00 ^ab	23.73±0.12 ^b	24.47±0.46 ^a
X₁₀还原糖Reducing sugar content (g/mL)	233.33±2.45 ^b	224.40±2.15 ^c	242.80±3.15 ^a
X₁₁可滴定酸Titratable acid (%)	0.84±0.02 ^a	0.80±0.02 ^b	0.83±0.00^ab
X₁₂糖酸比Sugar/acid	27.88±0.97^b	28.06±0.54 ^ab	29.43±0.38^a
X₁₃ pH值pH value	3.48±0.10 ^a	3.30±0.01 ^b	3.28±0.01 ^b
X₁₄L	25.03±0.75 ^a	24.93±1.26 ^a	25.21±0.77^a
X₁₅a	-0.63±0.44 ^ab	-0.28±1.10 ^a	-1.27±0.76 ^b
X₁₆b	-2.82±0.47 ^b	-2.58±0.40 ^b	-1.97±0.39 ^a
X₁₇C	2.92±0.49 ^a	2.77±0.59 ^ab	2.44±0.51^b
X₁₈CIRG	3.68±0.35 ^b	6.43±3.08 ^a	4.91±1.54 ^ab

测定指标 Measurement indexes	对照CK Compare	园艺地布BGM Horticultural ground cloth	生草栽培GM Sod-culture
X₁果穗质量Cluster weight(g)	109.40±45.23 ^b	127.32±20.76 ^b	172.83±61.80^a
X₂紧密度Density	4.67±1.15 ^b	4.33±0.98 ^b	6.17±1.03 ^a
X₃萎蔫率Wilting percent (%)	0.91±2.02 ^b	5.45±6.88^a	0.00±0.00 ^b
X₄出汁率Juice yield(%)	33.42±0.25 ^b	32.89±0.11 ^b	38.29±0.59 ^a
X₅果粒质量Berry weight (g)	0.91±0.09 ^b	0.93±0.04 ^b	1.18±0.05 ^a
X₆果粒纵径Longitudinal diameter(mm)	10.76±0.52 ^c	12.07±0.29 ^b	12.90±0037 ^a
X₇果粒横径Transverse diameter(mm)	10.70±0.42 ^c	11.97±0.44 ^b	12.38±0.32 ^a
X₈果形指数Fruit shape index	1.01±0.04^b	1.01±0.04 ^b	1.04±0.03 ^a
X₉可溶性固形物Soluble solid (°Brix)	24.20±0.00 ^ab	23.73±0.12 ^b	24.47±0.46 ^a
X₁₀还原糖Reducing sugar content (g/mL)	233.33±2.45 ^b	224.40±2.15 ^c	242.80±3.15 ^a
X₁₁可滴定酸Titratable acid (%)	0.84±0.02 ^a	0.80±0.02 ^b	0.83±0.00^ab
X₁₂糖酸比Sugar/acid	27.88±0.97^b	28.06±0.54 ^ab	29.43±0.38^a
X₁₃ pH值pH value	3.48±0.10 ^a	3.30±0.01 ^b	3.28±0.01 ^b
X₁₄L	25.03±0.75 ^a	24.93±1.26 ^a	25.21±0.77^a
X₁₅a	-0.63±0.44 ^ab	-0.28±1.10 ^a	-1.27±0.76 ^b
X₁₆b	-2.82±0.47 ^b	-2.58±0.40 ^b	-1.97±0.39 ^a
X₁₇C	2.92±0.49 ^a	2.77±0.59 ^ab	2.44±0.51^b
X₁₈CIRG	3.68±0.35 ^b	6.43±3.08 ^a	4.91±1.54 ^ab

测定指标 Measurement indexes	对照CK Compare	园艺地布BGM Horticultural ground cloth	生草栽培GM Sod-culture
X₁₉花色苷含量Anthocyanins (mg/kg)	740.57±9.86^a	777.37±126.34 ^a	664.32±18.59 ^a
X₂₀总酚含量Total phenol content (mg/g)	0.75±0.02^c	2.26±0.13 ^a	1.28±0.01 ^b
X₂₁类黄酮含量Flavonoids (mg/g)	1.72±0.02 ^c	8.04±0.26 ^a	3.75±0.07 ^b
X₂₂黄烷醇含量Flavanols (mg/g)	2.62±0.08 ^c	5.45±0.10 ^a	3.19±0.05 ^b
X₂₃单宁含量Tannins content (mg/kg)	86.36±1.29^c	130.36±2.21^a	108.79±2.21 ^b
X₂₄DPPH(μg/g)	283.97±0.33 ^a	269.30±2.33 ^c	277.30±4.21^b
X₂₅FRAP(mg/g)	7.99±0.03 ^c	20.57±1.17 ^a	11.31±0.22 ^b
X₂₆ABTS(mg/g)	2.97±0.16 ^b	5.40±0.11 ^a	3.17±0.21 ^b

测定指标 Measurement indexes	对照CK Compare	园艺地布BGM Horticultural ground cloth	生草栽培GM Sod-culture
X₁₉花色苷含量Anthocyanins (mg/kg)	740.57±9.86^a	777.37±126.34 ^a	664.32±18.59 ^a
X₂₀总酚含量Total phenol content (mg/g)	0.75±0.02^c	2.26±0.13 ^a	1.28±0.01 ^b
X₂₁类黄酮含量Flavonoids (mg/g)	1.72±0.02 ^c	8.04±0.26 ^a	3.75±0.07 ^b
X₂₂黄烷醇含量Flavanols (mg/g)	2.62±0.08 ^c	5.45±0.10 ^a	3.19±0.05 ^b
X₂₃单宁含量Tannins content (mg/kg)	86.36±1.29^c	130.36±2.21^a	108.79±2.21 ^b
X₂₄DPPH(μg/g)	283.97±0.33 ^a	269.30±2.33 ^c	277.30±4.21^b
X₂₅FRAP(mg/g)	7.99±0.03 ^c	20.57±1.17 ^a	11.31±0.22 ^b
X₂₆ABTS(mg/g)	2.97±0.16 ^b	5.40±0.11 ^a	3.17±0.21 ^b

地面覆盖方式 Ground mulch types	主成分得分 Principal component score			综合得分 Compreh ensive score
地面覆盖方式 Ground mulch types	CI₁	CI₂	CI₃	综合得分 Compreh ensive score
对照CK	-1.224	-4.007	-1.102	-2.131
园艺地布BGM Horticultural ground cloth	4.464	4.055	0.047	2.472
生草栽培GM Sod-culture	-3.329	2.952	0.056	-0.341
贡献率 Contribution rate(%)	0.461	0.380	0.077