Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 386-392.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.02.015
• Plant Protection·Microbes • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xuyan1,2(), JIA Zunzun2, Tuerxun Ahemaiti2, FU Kaiyun2, DING Xinhua2, LI Yawen2, GUO Wenchao2(
), Yasen Shali1(
)
Received:
2024-08-13
Online:
2025-02-20
Published:
2025-04-17
Correspondence author:
GUO Wenchao, Yasen Shali
Supported by:
张旭艳1,2(), 贾尊尊2, 吐尔逊·阿合买提2, 付开赟2, 丁新华2, 李亚文2, 郭文超2(
), 牙森·沙力1(
)
通讯作者:
郭文超,牙森·沙力
作者简介:
张旭艳(1997-),女,甘肃人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业虫害综合防治,(E-mail)723391271@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Xuyan, JIA Zunzun, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, LI Yawen, GUO Wenchao, Yasen Shali. Determination of indoor virulence of four insecticides against Phthorimaea absoluta Meyrick and field control effect[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 386-392.
张旭艳, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 付开赟, 丁新华, 李亚文, 郭文超, 牙森·沙力. 4种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 386-392.
序号 Serial number | 供试药剂 Test reagent | 剂量 处理 Dose treatment | 有效 成分 Active ingredient (g/hm2) | 稀释 倍数 Dilution factor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20%啶虫脒SP (深圳诺普信农化 股份有限公司) | 低 | 120 | 6 250 |
高 | 180 | 4 160 | ||
2 | 5%甲维盐ME (华北制药集团 爱诺有限公司) | 低 | 90 | 8 300 |
高 | 180 | 4 100 | ||
3 | 0.3%印楝素EC (成都绿金生物 科技有限公司) | 低 | 6 000 | 125 |
高 | 9 000 | 80 | ||
4 | 0.5%苦参碱SL (北京三浦百草 绿色植物制剂 有限公司) | 低 | 1 290 | 580 |
高 | 1 725 | 430 | ||
清水(对照) Water(CK) | - | - | - | - |
Tab.1 Reagent treatment and dosage of reagents
序号 Serial number | 供试药剂 Test reagent | 剂量 处理 Dose treatment | 有效 成分 Active ingredient (g/hm2) | 稀释 倍数 Dilution factor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20%啶虫脒SP (深圳诺普信农化 股份有限公司) | 低 | 120 | 6 250 |
高 | 180 | 4 160 | ||
2 | 5%甲维盐ME (华北制药集团 爱诺有限公司) | 低 | 90 | 8 300 |
高 | 180 | 4 100 | ||
3 | 0.3%印楝素EC (成都绿金生物 科技有限公司) | 低 | 6 000 | 125 |
高 | 9 000 | 80 | ||
4 | 0.5%苦参碱SL (北京三浦百草 绿色植物制剂 有限公司) | 低 | 1 290 | 580 |
高 | 1 725 | 430 | ||
清水(对照) Water(CK) | - | - | - | - |
序号 Serial number | 供试药剂 Test agent | 供试虫数 Number of tested wormst | 毒力方程 Toxicity regression equations | LC50值 LC50 value (mg/L) | 95%置信限 Confidence interval | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20%啶虫脒SP | 210 | Y=4.972+0.278X | 1.27 | 0.222 2~7.207 | 0.973 |
2 | 5%甲维盐ME | 210 | Y=4.583+0.612X | 0.68 | 2.349~9.796 | 0.960 |
3 | 0.5%苦参碱EC | 210 | Y=5.668+0.500X | 0.05 | 0.006~0.374 | 0.951 |
4 | 0.3%印楝素SL | 210 | Y=5.199+0.632X | 0.49 | 0.168~1.404 | 0.871 |
Tab.2 Indoor virulence of four insecticides against the 2nd instar larvae of C.tomato
序号 Serial number | 供试药剂 Test agent | 供试虫数 Number of tested wormst | 毒力方程 Toxicity regression equations | LC50值 LC50 value (mg/L) | 95%置信限 Confidence interval | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20%啶虫脒SP | 210 | Y=4.972+0.278X | 1.27 | 0.222 2~7.207 | 0.973 |
2 | 5%甲维盐ME | 210 | Y=4.583+0.612X | 0.68 | 2.349~9.796 | 0.960 |
3 | 0.5%苦参碱EC | 210 | Y=5.668+0.500X | 0.05 | 0.006~0.374 | 0.951 |
4 | 0.3%印楝素SL | 210 | Y=5.199+0.632X | 0.49 | 0.168~1.404 | 0.871 |
序号 Serial number | 处理 Treatments | 虫口基数 (头/40株) Insect base number | 用药后3 d 3 day after application | 用药后7 d 7 day after application | 用药后10 d 10 day after application | 用药后14 d 14 day after application | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | 虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | 虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | 虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | |||
1 | 啶虫脒-L | 47 | 42.4±2.24Bc | 48.69±2.42Bc | 63.68±4.24CDb | 69.68±4.53CDb | 74.5±3.05CDa | 80.76±2.03CDa | 82.89±0.67ABa | 87.78±0.49ABa |
2 | 啶虫脒-H | 50 | 54.28±2.98Ad | 59.15±3.43Ad | 70.54±3.79BCc | 75.35±4.08BCc | 81.95±1.56ABCDb | 86.20±1.48ABCDb | 93.65±3.82Aa | 95.45±2.74Aa |
3 | 甲维盐-L | 57 | 49.08±1.84ABc | 54.76±0.83ABc | 75.28±0.94Bb | 79.6±0.71Bb | 86.7±2.85ABa | 89.89±2.18ABa | 91.66±2.87Aa | 94.06±2.05Aa |
4 | 甲维盐-H | 61 | 55.61±5.09Ab | 60.50±4.62Ab | 87.01±2.29Aa | 89.45±1.67Aa | 91.74±1.71Aa | 93.75±1.25Aa | 95.19±1.61Aa | 96.49±1.17Aa |
5 | 印楝素-L | 38 | 22.88±6.67Cc | 31.25±6.30Cc | 51.25±3.27EFb | 59.77±2.59EFb | 80.51±4.65BCDa | 85.32±3.34BCDa | 91.66±5.89Aa | 94.24±3.93Aa |
6 | 印楝素-H | 40 | 29.24±3.61Cc | 37.07±2.87Cc | 65.75±2.69BCDb | 71.88±1.55BCDb | 84.01±2.39ABCa | 87.82±1.92ABCa | 91.28±5.03Aa | 94.02±3.44Aa |
7 | 苦参碱-L | 49 | 27.01±1.76Cd | 35.03±1.77Cd | 44.17±2.587Fc | 53.97±1.64Fc | 61.89±4.43Fb | 71.05±3.35Eb | 76.25±5.09Ba | 82.99±3.68Ba |
8 | 苦参碱-H | 45 | 28.24±2.54Cd | 36.22±1.41Cd | 58.04±4.33DEc | 65.00±4.71DEc | 71.63±3.93Eb | 78.23±3.56DEb | 86.98±1.75ABa | 90.71±1.24ABa |
9 | CK | 47 | -12.43±2.14Dab | - | -21.44±4.80Gbc | - | -21.44±3.49Gcd | - | -40.22±3.98Cd | - |
Tab.3 Changes of field control effects of four insecticides on tomato leafminer
序号 Serial number | 处理 Treatments | 虫口基数 (头/40株) Insect base number | 用药后3 d 3 day after application | 用药后7 d 7 day after application | 用药后10 d 10 day after application | 用药后14 d 14 day after application | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | 虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | 虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | 虫口减退率 Reducing rates for the pest(%) | 校正防效 Control efficacyaff (%) | |||
1 | 啶虫脒-L | 47 | 42.4±2.24Bc | 48.69±2.42Bc | 63.68±4.24CDb | 69.68±4.53CDb | 74.5±3.05CDa | 80.76±2.03CDa | 82.89±0.67ABa | 87.78±0.49ABa |
2 | 啶虫脒-H | 50 | 54.28±2.98Ad | 59.15±3.43Ad | 70.54±3.79BCc | 75.35±4.08BCc | 81.95±1.56ABCDb | 86.20±1.48ABCDb | 93.65±3.82Aa | 95.45±2.74Aa |
3 | 甲维盐-L | 57 | 49.08±1.84ABc | 54.76±0.83ABc | 75.28±0.94Bb | 79.6±0.71Bb | 86.7±2.85ABa | 89.89±2.18ABa | 91.66±2.87Aa | 94.06±2.05Aa |
4 | 甲维盐-H | 61 | 55.61±5.09Ab | 60.50±4.62Ab | 87.01±2.29Aa | 89.45±1.67Aa | 91.74±1.71Aa | 93.75±1.25Aa | 95.19±1.61Aa | 96.49±1.17Aa |
5 | 印楝素-L | 38 | 22.88±6.67Cc | 31.25±6.30Cc | 51.25±3.27EFb | 59.77±2.59EFb | 80.51±4.65BCDa | 85.32±3.34BCDa | 91.66±5.89Aa | 94.24±3.93Aa |
6 | 印楝素-H | 40 | 29.24±3.61Cc | 37.07±2.87Cc | 65.75±2.69BCDb | 71.88±1.55BCDb | 84.01±2.39ABCa | 87.82±1.92ABCa | 91.28±5.03Aa | 94.02±3.44Aa |
7 | 苦参碱-L | 49 | 27.01±1.76Cd | 35.03±1.77Cd | 44.17±2.587Fc | 53.97±1.64Fc | 61.89±4.43Fb | 71.05±3.35Eb | 76.25±5.09Ba | 82.99±3.68Ba |
8 | 苦参碱-H | 45 | 28.24±2.54Cd | 36.22±1.41Cd | 58.04±4.33DEc | 65.00±4.71DEc | 71.63±3.93Eb | 78.23±3.56DEb | 86.98±1.75ABa | 90.71±1.24ABa |
9 | CK | 47 | -12.43±2.14Dab | - | -21.44±4.80Gbc | - | -21.44±3.49Gcd | - | -40.22±3.98Cd | - |
[1] | Desneux N, Luna M G, Guillemaud T, et al. The invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond: the new threat to tomato world production[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2011, 84(4): 403-408. |
[2] | Biondi A, Guedes R N C, Wan F H, et al. Ecology, worldwide spread, and management of the invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: past, present, and future[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2018, 63: 239-258. |
[3] | Chen L M, Li X W, Zhang J M, et al. Comprehensive metabolome and volatilome analyses in eggplant and tomato reveal their differential responses to Tuta absoluta infestation[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 757230. |
[4] | 张桂芬, 张毅波, 冼晓青, 等. 新发重大农业入侵害虫番茄潜叶蛾的发生为害与防控对策[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(4): 51-58. |
ZHANG Guifen, ZHANG Yibo, XIAN Xiaoqing, et al. Damage of an important and newly invaded agricultural pest, Phthorimaea absoluta, and its prevention and management measures[J]. Plant Protection, 2022, 48(4): 51-58. | |
[5] | 张桂芬, 冼晓青, 张毅波, 等. 警惕南美番茄潜叶蛾Tuta absoluta(Meyrick)在中国扩散[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(2): 281-286. |
ZHANG Guifen, XIAN Xiaoqing, ZHANG Yibo, et al. Warning of the dispersal of a newly invaded alien species, tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), in China[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(2): 281-286. | |
[6] | 陆永跃. 警惕番茄潜叶蛾Tuta absoluta(Meyrick)在我国持续扩散入侵[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(2): 526-528. |
LU Yongyue. Beware of the continuous spread and invasion of tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta(Meyrick) in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2021, 43(2): 526-528. | |
[7] | 谈钇汐. 新疆番茄潜叶蛾发生、扩散规律及监测技术研究[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2023. |
TAN Yixi. Study on the occurrence, diffusion and monitoring technology of tomato leaver moth in Xinjiang[D]. Ala’er: Tarim University, 2023. | |
[8] | 张润志. 番茄潜麦蛾Tuta absoluta(Povolny)危害状(果实)[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(5): 996. |
ZHANG Runzhi. Damage of tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta(Povolny) (fruit)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2019, 56(5): 996. | |
[9] | Roditakis E, Vasakis E, García-Vidal L, et al. A four-year survey on insecticide resistance and likelihood of chemical control failure for tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta in the European/Asian region[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2018, 91(1): 421-435. |
[10] | Langa T P, Dantas K C T, Pereira D L, et al. Basis and monitoring of methoxyfenozide resistance in the South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2022, 95(1): 351-364. |
[11] | Roditakis E, Vasakis E, Grispou M, et al. First report of Tuta absoluta resistance to diamide insecticides[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2015, 88(1): 9-16. |
[12] | 王少丽, 史彩华, 徐丹丹, 等. 入侵性南美番茄潜叶蛾高效药剂筛选及其抗性基因突变检测[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2021,(11): 33-36. |
WANG Shaoli, SHI Caihua, XU Dandan, et al. Screening of efficient insecticide against invasive Tuta absoluta(Meyrick) and detection of its resistance gene mutation[J]. China Vegetables, 2021,(11): 33-36. | |
[13] | Kumar J S, Jayaraj J, Shanthi M, et al. Toxicity of insecticides to tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) populations from Tamil Nadu[J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2020. |
[14] | Oben T T, Arrey D B, Mbah G T, et al. Botanicals, as a sustainable agroecological alternative to synthetic pesticide for controlling leaf miner (pinworm) and Fusarium wilt disease of tomato[J]. Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 14(8): 1022-1037. |
[15] | A. T M, S. H E, N. A A, et al. The Potential of a Novel Concept of an Integrated Bio and Chemical Formulate Based on an Entomopathogenic Bacteria, Bacillus thuringiensis, and a Chemical Insecticide to Control Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta ‘(Meyrick)’ (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (17): 10582. |
[16] |
Garba M, Streito J C, Gauthier N. First report of three predatory bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato fields infested by the invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta in Niger: an opportunity for biological control?[J]. Phytoparasitica, 2020, 48(2): 215-229.
DOI |
[17] |
付开赟, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 等. 10种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.
DOI |
FU Kaiyun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, et al. Evaluation of 10 kinds of insecticides on the control effect of tomato leaf miner[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.
DOI |
|
[18] |
阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 等. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12): 2291-2298.
DOI |
Amire Yashengjiang; Adili Shataer; FU Kaiyun, et al. Control effects of 9 pesticides on tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (meyrick)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(12): 2291-2298.
DOI |
|
[19] | 郭文秀, 夏小菊, 李丽莉, 等. 番茄潜叶蛾及其他4种番茄常发害虫的高效兼治药剂筛选[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(11): 40-48. |
GUO Wenxiu, XIA Xiaoju, LI Lili, et al. Effective pesticide screening for common control of Phthorimaea absoluta and other four pests of tomato[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 55(11): 40-48. | |
[20] | Roditakis E, Skarmoutsou C, Staurakaki M, et al. Determination of baseline susceptibility of European populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) to indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole using a novel dip bioassay method[J]. Pest Management Science, 2013, 69(2): 217-227. |
[21] | 张桂芬, 刘万学, 万方浩, 等. 世界毁灭性检疫害虫番茄潜叶蛾的生物生态学及危害与控制[J]. 生物安全学报, 2018, 27(3): 155-163. |
ZHANG Guifen, LIU Wanxue, WAN Fanghao, et al. Bioecology,damage and management of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta(Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a worldwide quarantine pest[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2018, 27(3): 155-163. | |
[22] | 杨石有, 张蕊, 李宏琳, 等. 3种喷雾助剂对5%氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂防治番茄潜叶蛾的增效作用[J/OL]. 植物保护, 1-5[2023-12-05]. |
YANG, ZHANG R, LI, et al. Synergistic effect of three spray additives on the control of tomato leaf miner with 5% chlorantraniliprole suspension[J/OL]. Plant Protection, 1-5[2023-12-05]. | |
[23] | 庾琴, 郭晓君, 封云涛, 等. 6种杀虫剂对南美番茄潜叶蛾的毒力及田间防效[J]. 生物安全学报, 2022, 31(4): 345-350. |
YU Qin, GUO Xiaojun, FENG Yuntao, et al. Toxicity of six insecticides on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) and control efficacy in field trials[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2022, 31(4): 345-350. | |
[24] | 许海阳, 贺晓红, 赵慧琳, 等. 不同药剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果初探[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2022,(5): 174-176. |
XU Haiyang, HE Xiaohong, ZHAO Huilin, et al. Control effects of different pesticides on tomato leaf miner[J]. Agricultural Technology & Equipment, 2022,(5): 174-176. | |
[25] | 杨帆, 望勇, 骆海波, 等. 13种化学杀虫剂对草地贪夜蛾的室内杀卵活性和田间防效[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(8): 37-42. |
YANG Fan, Wang Yong, Luo Haibo, et al. Ovicidal activity and control efficacy of thirteen chemical insecticides against Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(8): 37-42. | |
[26] | 曾荣樟. 苦参碱杀虫粉剂对淡竹毒蛾防效分析[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2015, 13 (1): 18-20. |
ZENG Rongzhang. Analysis of the control effect of matrine insecticide powder on the poisonous moth of light bamboo[J]. World Bamboo and Rattan Newsletter, 2015, 13 (1): 18-20. | |
[27] | 侯长江. 1.2%烟碱·苦参碱乳油防治落叶松舞毒蛾田间药效试验[J]. 农药, 2013, 52 (6): 437-438,443. |
HOU Changjiang. Field efficacy test of 1.2% nicotine and matrine EC in the control of larch dance moth[J]. Agrochemicals, 2013, 52 (6): 437-438,443. | |
[28] | 谢军保, 曾凡礼, 谢元生, 等. 0.3%苦参碱防治稻纵卷叶螟田间药效试验[J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2010, 16 (11): 171. |
XIE Junbao, ZENG Fanli, XIE Yuansheng, et al. Field efficacy test of 0.3% matrine for the control of rice leaf roller borer[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 16 (11): 171. | |
[29] | 夏丽娟, 李靖, 梁竟宇, 等. 印楝素对亚洲玉米螟的毒力与防效及对寄主作物高粱的安全性评价[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(3): 539-544. |
XIA Lijuan, LI Jing, LIANG Jingyu, et al. Toxicity and field efficacy of azadirachtin against Ostrinia furnacalis Guenee and safety evaluation to Sorghum[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2022, 45(3): 539-544. |
[1] | ZHANG Shuai, GAO Guowen, WU Lili, ZHAO Haiyan, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, DING Xinhua, LI Kemei, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of the synergistic application of seed coating agents, synergists, and micro fertilizers for the prevention and control of corn stem rot disease [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27. |
[2] | FU Kaiyun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Ahmat Tuerxun, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172. |
[3] | YAN Hongjiang, LI Weizheng, LIANG He, NING Zongxiong, LU Wei. Indoor Toxicity and Field Efficacy of Three Neonicotinoids Against Aphis gossypii [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8): 1454-1459. |
[4] | LIU Jiamei, LIU Bing, WANG Peiling, LU Yanhui. Toxicity of Three Botanical Insecticides to Aphis gossypii and Their Selectivity to Hippodamia variegata [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2069-2076. |
[5] | Zhixiong LI, Yindi WEI, Yue SU, Bingrun CHEN, Guohui HOU, Hui WEN, Yongsheng YAO, Jing CHEN. Effects of Sublethal Doses of Three Insecticides on the Growth and Reproduction of Aphis gossypii and Acyrthosiphon gossypii [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1851-1859. |
[6] | DOU Yanan, AN Jingjie, GAO Zhanlin, DANG Zhihong, PAN Wenliang, LI Yaofa. Temperature Effect on the Toxicity of Diamide Insecticides to Spodoptera exigua Hübner [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 658-664. |
[7] | TU Xuewei, AN Jingjie, DOU Yanan, GAO Zhanlin, DANG Zhihong, PAN Wenliang, ZHAO Guocun, LI Yaofa. Evaluation of the Safety and Control Effects of Five Insecticides Seed Dressing on Cotton Seedling Aphids [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 616-622. |
[8] | WANG Zhihui, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, FU Kaiyun, Tursun Ahmat, HE Jiang, GUO Wenchao. An Ultra Low Spray Control Technique for Corn Borer Based on Synergist and Insecticide [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2): 311-318. |
[9] | FAN Weiyan, ZHANG Jiayu, YANG Desong, ZHANG Guoqiang, CHEN Liusheng. Indoor Toxicity Test and Pesticide Screening of Five Pesticides to the Stephanitis nashi Esaki et Takeya [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2): 303-310. |
[10] | LI Haiqiang, WANG Dong mei, LI Haobin, PAN Hongsheng, DING Ruifeng, Ahtam·Uwayis, LIU Jian. Indoor Toxicities of Nine Insecticides to Apolygus lucorum Meyer-Dür in Agricultural District [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 2075-2082. |
[11] | XU Min, YANG Ni-na, XU Dong, CONG Shen-bo, CHEN Li-zhen, WAN Peng, LI Wen-jing. Sublethal Effects of Sulfoxaflor on the Development, Reproduction and Insecticidal Susceptibility of Adelphocoris suturalis Jakovlev (Hemiptera: Miridae) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(3): 465-471. |
[12] | GUO Zhi-gang,AN Jing-jie,GAO Zhan-lin,DANG Zhi-hong, PAN Wen-liang,YUAN Wen-long, LI Yao-fa. Bioactivity of Benzoylphenylurea Insecticides Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür)by Different Bioassay Methods [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(1): 61-66. |
[13] | HU Di, ZHANG Xuan, LUO Jin - cang, NAN Hong - yu, LI Yi - ping. Study on Occurrence Dynamics of Aphis gossypii and Botanical Pesticide Control Technology in Hexi Corridor Region [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(1): 38-45. |
[14] | . Studies on the Control Effect of Ultra-Low Volume Aerial Spray Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Against the Corn Borer [J]. , 2017, 54(3): 479-488. |
[15] | . Studies on Control Effect of Asian Corn Borer, Pyrausta nubilalis Guenée in Fields and Economic Benefit Evaluation in Xinjiang Desert and Oasis Ecological Zone [J]. , 2016, 53(4): 663-672. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 10
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 42
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||