Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.015

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 1165-1172.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.015

• Plant Protection·Microbes·Storage and Preservation Processing • Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner

FU Kaiyun¹(), LI Aimei², DING Xinhua¹, JIA Zunzun¹, Ahmat Tuerxun¹, FENG Hongzu², GUO Wenchao¹()

1. Key Laboratory of Intergraded Management of Harmful Crop Vermin of China Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the P.R.C. /Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China
2. College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar Xinjiang 843300, China

Received:2021-12-21 Online:2022-05-20 Published:2022-06-09
Correspondence author: GUO Wenchao
Supported by:
The Innovation Environment (Talent, Base) Construction Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region-Construction of Science and Technology Innovation Base (Resource-Sharing Platform Construction) "Xinjiang Foreign Invasive Biological Monitoring and Detection Data Sharing Platform"(PT2028);The Key Technology Innovation Incubation Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjkcpy-002)

10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价

付开赟¹(), 李爱梅², 丁新华¹, 贾尊尊¹, 吐尔逊·阿合买提¹, 冯宏祖², 郭文超¹()

1.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.塔里木大学农学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300

通讯作者: 郭文超
作者简介:付开赟(1987-),男,浙江人,助理研究员,研究方向为农业害虫综合防治,(E-mail) fukaiyun000@foxmail.com
基金资助:
自治区创新环境(人才、基地)建设专项—科技创新基地建设(资源共享平台建设)“新疆外来入侵生物监测检测数据共享平台”(PT2028);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育专项“新疆重大新发农林入侵生物监测预警与综合防控”(xjkcpy-002)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner. 【Methods】 In order to effectively control the occurrence and damage of tomato leaf miners, the control effects of 10 pesticides were measured after spraying in the field. 【Results】 The results showed that in the field test, the combination of 34% ethidium methoxine 48 mL/667m², 6% spinosad 50 mL/667m² and 0.05% silicone additive 15 mL/667m², 6% spinosad 50 mL/667m², 20% chlorantraniliprole 6.7 mL/667m², 20% chlorantraniliprole 10 mL/667m² could reach 94.59%, 93.10%, 90.97% and 91.29%, respectively in the field control. 【Conclusion】 34% ethoxylate SC 48 mL/667m², 6% spinosad SC 50 mL/667m² and 0.05% silicone additive 15 mL/667m² are suggested to be used turn in field.

Key words: Tuta absoluta(Meyrick); insect population decline rate; pesticide selection; chemical control; field control effect

摘要：

【目的】分析评价10种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果,为研究番茄潜叶蛾种群的化学防治以及综合治理提供一定的科学参考依据。【方法】测定 10 种药剂在田间喷施后对其防治效果。【结果】34% 乙多·甲氧虫 48 mL/667 m²、6% 乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂50 mL/667 m² 与0.05% 有机硅助剂 15 mL/667 m² 组合、 6% 乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂 50 mL/667 m² 与 20% 氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂 6.7 mL/667 m²、20% 氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂10 mL/667 m² 在药后 14 d,其田间防治效果分别可达 94.59%、93.10%、90.97%、91.29%。【结论】生产上使用34% 乙多·甲氧虫SC 48 mL/667m²或6% 乙基多杀菌素SC 50 mL/667m² 与 0.05% 有机硅助剂15 mL/667m² 组合交替进行防治。

关键词: 番茄潜叶蛾, 虫口减退率, 药剂选择, 化学防治, 田间防效

CLC Number:

S436.412

FU Kaiyun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Ahmat Tuerxun, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.

付开赟, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

[1]	张润志. 番茄潜麦蛾Tuta absoluta(Povolny)危害状(叶片)[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(6):1271.
	ZHANG Runzhi. Tomato moth Tuta absoluta (Povolny) damage (leaves)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2019, 56(6):1271.
[2]	Batalla-Carrera L, Morton A, Fernando García-del-Pino. Efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes against the tomato leafminer Tuta absolutain laboratory and greenhouse conditions[J]. BioControl, 2010, 55(4):523-530. DOI URL
[3]	Osa A, Hill M P, Zalucki M P, et al. The South America Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Spreads Its Wings in Eastern Africa: Distribution and Socioeconomic Impacts[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019(6):6.
[4]	张桂芬, 马德英, 刘万学, 等. 中国新发现外来入侵害虫--南美番茄潜叶蛾(鳞翅目:麦蛾科)[J]. 生物安全学报, 2019, 28(3):200-203.
	ZHANG Guifen, MA Deying, LIU Wanxue, et al. A Newly Discovered Invasive Pest in China--South American Tomato Leaf Miner (Lepidoptera: Triticidae)[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2019, 28(3):200-203.
[5]	陆永跃. 警惕番茄潜叶蛾Tuta absoluta(Meyrick)在我国持续扩散入侵[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(2):526-528.
	LU Yongyue. Beware of the continuous proliferation and invasion of the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in my country[J]. Entomology of the Environment, 2021, 43(2):526-528.
[6]	李栋, 李晓维, 马琳, 等. 温度对番茄潜叶蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2019, 62(12):1417-1426.
	LI Dong, LI Xiaowei, MA Lin, et al. Effects of temperature on the growth, development and reproduction of tomato leaf miners[J]. Acta Entomology, 2019, 62(12):1417-1426.
[7]	李晓维, 李栋, 郭文超, 等. 番茄潜叶蛾对4种茄科植物的适应性研究[J]. 植物检疫, 2019, 33(3):1-5.
	LI Xiaowei, LI Dong, GUO Wenchao, et al. Adaptation of Tomato Leaf Miner to Four Solanaceae Plants[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2019, 33(3):1-5.
[8]	张桂芬. 南美番茄潜叶蛾Tuta absoluta,a.幼虫及为害状,b.蛹,c.成虫,d.卵[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(2):1.
	ZHANG Guifen. South American tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta, a. larvae and damage, b. pupa, c. adult, d. egg[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(2): 1.
[9]	张桂芬, 刘万学, 万方浩, 等. 世界毁灭性检疫害虫番茄潜叶蛾的生物生态学及危害与控制[J]. 生物安全学报, 2018, 27(3):155-163.
	ZHANG Guifen, LIU Wanxue, WAN Fanghao, et al. Bioecology, damage and control of tomato leafminer, the world's devastating quarantine pest[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2018, 27(3):155-163.
[10]	王俊, 高建诚, 管辉. 番茄潜叶蛾在新疆的发生情况与防控建议[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(12):83-84,79.
	WANG Jun, GAO Jiancheng, GUAN Hui. Occurrence of Tomato Leaf Miner in Xinjiang and Suggestions for Prevention and Control[J]. China Plant Protection Guide, 2021, 41(12): 83-84,79.
[11]	张继峯, 王振华, 张金珠, 等. 滴灌下氮盐交互对加工番茄荧光特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(5):990-1003.
	ZHANG Jifeng, WANG Zhenhua, ZHANG Jinzhu, et al. Effects of nitrogen-salt interaction under drip irrigation on fluorescence characteristics and yield and quality of processed tomatoes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5):990-1003.
[12]	林兴华, 杨子林, 韦丽莉, 等. 临沧市番茄潜麦蛾动态监测与防控技术研究[J]. 云南农业科技, 2021,(1):9-11.
	LIN Xinghua, YANG Zilin, WEI Lili, et al. Research on dynamic monitoring and prevention and control technology of tomato moth in Lincang City[J]. Yunnan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(1):9-11.
[13]	Zhang Y, Tian X, Wang H, et al. Host selection behavior of the host-feeding parasitoid Necremnus tutae on Tuta absoluta[J]. Entomologia Generalis, 2021.
[14]	杨桂群, 范苇, 张倩, 等. 异色瓢虫和龟纹瓢虫幼虫对番茄潜叶蛾低龄幼虫的捕食功能反应[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2021,(9):1-12.
	YANG Guiqun, FAN Wei, ZHANG Qian, et al. Predatory functional responses of La. axyridis and La. tortoise larvae to young larvae of Tomato leaf miner[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2021,(9):1-12.
[15]	马琳, 李晓维, 王树明, 等. 6种杀虫剂对云南地区番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力测定[C]// 北京:中国植物保护学会2019年学术年会论文集, 2019. MALin, LIXiaowei, WANGShuming, et al. Indoor virulence determination of six insecticides against tomato leafminers in Yunnan[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Academic Conference of the Chinese Society for Plant Protection.
[16]	Ingegno B L, Messelink G J, Bodino N, et al. Functional response of the mirid predators Dicyphus bolivari and Dicyphus errans and their efficacy as biological control agents of Tuta absoluta on tomato[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2019.
[17]	阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 等. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12):2291-2298. DOI
	Amire Yashengjiang, Adili Shatar, FU Kaiyun, et al. Control of Tomato Leaf Miner by 9 Insecticides Effect evaluation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(12):2291-2298. DOI
[18]	余细红, 李韶山. 我国生物入侵现状与防制分析[J]. 生物学教学, 2022,(1):1-2.
	YU Xihong, LI Shaoshan. Analysis of the current situation and prevention of biological invasion in my country[J]. Biology Teaching, 2022,(1):1-2.
[19]	高峰. 不得不防的灾害-物种污染[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2016, 36(4):23.
	GAO Feng. Disasters that must be prevented-species pollution[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 2016, 36(4): 23.
[20]	高建诚, 王俊, 马丽娟, 等. 警惕番茄潜叶蛾威胁新疆加工番茄产业安全[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2021,(5):37-39.
	GAO Jiancheng, WANG Jun, MA Lijuan, et al. Beware of tomato leaf miners threatening the safety of processed tomato industry in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(5):37-39.
[21]	张桂芬, 张毅波, 张杰, 等. 苏云金芽胞杆菌G033A对新发南美番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):175-183.
	ZHANG Guifen, ZHANG Yibo, ZHANG Jie, et al. Indoor virulence and field control of Bacillus thuringiensis G033A against newly emerged South American tomato leaf miners Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2020, 36(2):175-183.

处理编号 Handling number	处理 Deal with	有效成分用量 Active ingredient dosage (gai/hm²)	制剂用量 Preparation dosage (g/mL /667m²)	用水量 (kg/ 667m²) Water consumption	小区面 Community area (m²)	增效剂用量 Synergist dosage g/mL/ 667m²
1	陶氏益农雷通240 g/L甲氧虫酰肼	151.2	42	30	124	-
2	先正达亮泰6% 阿维·氯苯酰	54	60	30	124	-
3	康宽20% 悬浮剂	21	7	30	124	-
4	康宽20% 悬浮剂	30	10	30	124	-
5	禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A	360×10⁸ IU	75	30	124	-
6	禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A	480×10⁸ IU	100	30	124	-
7	康邦20×10⁸ PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒	2.7万亿PIB	90	30	124	-
8	康邦20×10⁸ PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒	3.6万亿PIB	120	30	124	-
9	拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮	76.5	30	30	124	-
10	拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮	12	40	30	124	-
11	瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺	22.5	15	30	124	-
12	瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺	37.5	25	30	124	-
13	陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫	204	40	30	124	-
14	陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫	244.8	48	30	124	-
15	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂	45+0.05%	50+15	30	124	-
16	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂	45+20	50+6.7	30	124	-
17	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂	45+30	50+10	30	124	-
18	艾绿士 + 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼	45+108	50+30	30	124	-
19	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+ 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼	45+108	40+108	30	124	-
20	艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂	45	50	30	124	-
21	艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂	54	60	30	124	-
22	艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂	63	70	30	124	-
23	10% 溴氰虫酰胺油悬剂	21	14	30	124	-
24	康宽 20% 悬浮剂+激健	21	7	30	124	15
25	康宽 20% 悬浮剂+杰效利	21	7	30	124	15
26	康宽 20% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂	21	7	30	124	15
27	清水(UTC)	-	-	-	124	-

处理编号 Handling number	处理 Deal with	有效成分用量 Active ingredient dosage (gai/hm²)	制剂用量 Preparation dosage (g/mL /667m²)	用水量 (kg/ 667m²) Water consumption	小区面 Community area (m²)	增效剂用量 Synergist dosage g/mL/ 667m²
1	陶氏益农雷通240 g/L甲氧虫酰肼	151.2	42	30	124	-
2	先正达亮泰6% 阿维·氯苯酰	54	60	30	124	-
3	康宽20% 悬浮剂	21	7	30	124	-
4	康宽20% 悬浮剂	30	10	30	124	-
5	禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A	360×10⁸ IU	75	30	124	-
6	禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A	480×10⁸ IU	100	30	124	-
7	康邦20×10⁸ PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒	2.7万亿PIB	90	30	124	-
8	康邦20×10⁸ PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒	3.6万亿PIB	120	30	124	-
9	拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮	76.5	30	30	124	-
10	拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮	12	40	30	124	-
11	瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺	22.5	15	30	124	-
12	瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺	37.5	25	30	124	-
13	陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫	204	40	30	124	-
14	陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫	244.8	48	30	124	-
15	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂	45+0.05%	50+15	30	124	-
16	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂	45+20	50+6.7	30	124	-
17	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂	45+30	50+10	30	124	-
18	艾绿士 + 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼	45+108	50+30	30	124	-
19	艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+ 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼	45+108	40+108	30	124	-
20	艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂	45	50	30	124	-
21	艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂	54	60	30	124	-
22	艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂	63	70	30	124	-
23	10% 溴氰虫酰胺油悬剂	21	14	30	124	-
24	康宽 20% 悬浮剂+激健	21	7	30	124	15
25	康宽 20% 悬浮剂+杰效利	21	7	30	124	15
26	康宽 20% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂	21	7	30	124	15
27	清水(UTC)	-	-	-	124	-

试验处理 Test treatment	施药后虫口减退率 Insect population reduction rate after application (%)
试验处理 Test treatment	药后 3 d 3 d after medicine	药后 7 d 7 days after medicine	药后 10 d 10 days after medicine	药后 14 d 14 days after medicine
1	-6.000 0±0.372 3^ab	-127.000 0±0.626 8^abcde	-175.000 0±0.858 8^ab	-573.333 3±0.998 1^abc
2	61.746 0±0.136 4^a	19.444 4±0.121 1^abc	16.706 3±0.245 8^ab	-129.801 6±0.638 7^a
3	-5.000 0±0.360 9^ab	-175.000 0±0.423 4^abcd	-118.333 3±0.408 6^ab	-350.000 0±0.941 3^abc
4	45.333 3±0.166 5^a	32.000 0±0.142 0^ab	-56.000 0±0.286 4^ab	-38.666 7±0.363 0^a
5	46.476 2±0.265 1^a	-45.381 0±0.394 6^abcd	-110.761 9±0.439 3^ab	-124.190 5±0.341 5^a
6	-83.333 3±0.866 0^ab	-80.000 0±0.958 0^abcd	-300.000 0±1.766 2^abc	-356.666 7±1.726 1^abc
7	-65.694 6±0.348 3^ab	-223.193 8±0.523 1^cde	-443.096 6±0.992 3^abc	-1 281.646 4±1.670 1^cde
8	-138.752 1±1.268 7^bc	-31.287 9±0.302 8^abcd	-314.228 6±2.033 2^abc	-279.141 1±1.014 7^abc
9	-139.239 5±0.877 0^bc	-328.920 0±1.873 1^e	-124.233 3±5.295 3^cd	-1 251.393 3±4.574 5^bcde
10	-38.362 4±0.371 7^ab	-242.331 4±0.530 5^de	-126.429 9±4.194 2^cd	-1 018.021 0±2.922 1^abcd
11	-8.495 7±0.377 8^ab	-141.184 0±0.614 7^abcde	-994.602 6±2.325 0^bc	-1 084.241 5±2.587 0^abcd
12	-76.350 6±0.898 7^ab	-103.219 1±0.645 2^abcde	-1 986.819 8±10.958 9^d	-1 747.367 0±10.034 6^def
13	50.571 3±0.160 5^a	49.380 8±0.177 4^ab	-16.238 4±0.620 6^ab	-194.714 9±0.947 0^abc
14	78.534 3±0.078 8^a	79.520 6±0.050 5^a	74.987 6±0.226 7^a	0.245 5±0.283 4^a
15	79.238 1±0.061 9^a	58.254 0±0.161 6^a	92.952 4±0.055 3^a	-27.968 3±0.483 3^a
16	24.285 7±0.275 8^ab	37.619 0±0.361 1^ab	57.619 0±0.127 0^a	-61.904 8±0.484 2^a
17	2.698 4±0.359 6^ab	-59.523 8±0.759 8^abcd	-45.952 4±0.954 2^ab	-728.651 0±1.630 9^abcd
18	13.168 5±0.145 2^ab	-8.758 2±0.549 8^abcd	-152.718 0±1.025 7^ab	-529.963 3±1.224 6^abc
19	61.976 8±0.186 6^a	83.026 3±0.105 1^a	18.013 1±0.391 9^ab	-143.183 1±0.313 0^a
20	73.029 8±0.071 3^a	59.239 4±0.167 6^a	-5.305 3±0.242 1^ab	-203.929 7±0.593 2^abc
21	76.452 4±0.051 0^a	72.904 8±0.098 8^a	11.904 8±0.294 7^ab	-433.023 8±3.070 2^abc
22	49.532 5±0.054 8^a	2.722 9±0.299 8^abcd	29.588 7±0.186 2^ab	-170.580 0±0.376 7^ab
23	25.777 8±0.172 2^ab	17.333 3±0.257 1^abc	-31.111 1±0.360 7^ab	-229.333 3±0.301 6^abc
24	-1.261 9±0.150 7^ab	-140.357 1±0.282 1^abcde	-600.761 9±1.003 7^abc	-814.809 5±1.033 1^abcd
25	-30.000 0±0.435 9^ab	-200.000 0±0.900 6^bcde	-1 266.666 7±4.604 3^cd	-2 226.666 7±7.366 1^ef
26	0.000 0±0.235 7^ab	-243.333 3±0.348 0^de	-436.666 7±0.901 2^abc	-973.333 3±1.720 5^abcd
27	-233.166 7±1.029 7^c	-727.833 3±2.425 3^f	-2 019.833 3±6.197 8^d	-2 379.500 0±7.763 8^f

试验处理 Test treatment	施药后虫口减退率 Insect population reduction rate after application (%)
试验处理 Test treatment	药后 3 d 3 d after medicine	药后 7 d 7 days after medicine	药后 10 d 10 days after medicine	药后 14 d 14 days after medicine
1	-6.000 0±0.372 3^ab	-127.000 0±0.626 8^abcde	-175.000 0±0.858 8^ab	-573.333 3±0.998 1^abc
2	61.746 0±0.136 4^a	19.444 4±0.121 1^abc	16.706 3±0.245 8^ab	-129.801 6±0.638 7^a
3	-5.000 0±0.360 9^ab	-175.000 0±0.423 4^abcd	-118.333 3±0.408 6^ab	-350.000 0±0.941 3^abc
4	45.333 3±0.166 5^a	32.000 0±0.142 0^ab	-56.000 0±0.286 4^ab	-38.666 7±0.363 0^a
5	46.476 2±0.265 1^a	-45.381 0±0.394 6^abcd	-110.761 9±0.439 3^ab	-124.190 5±0.341 5^a
6	-83.333 3±0.866 0^ab	-80.000 0±0.958 0^abcd	-300.000 0±1.766 2^abc	-356.666 7±1.726 1^abc
7	-65.694 6±0.348 3^ab	-223.193 8±0.523 1^cde	-443.096 6±0.992 3^abc	-1 281.646 4±1.670 1^cde
8	-138.752 1±1.268 7^bc	-31.287 9±0.302 8^abcd	-314.228 6±2.033 2^abc	-279.141 1±1.014 7^abc
9	-139.239 5±0.877 0^bc	-328.920 0±1.873 1^e	-124.233 3±5.295 3^cd	-1 251.393 3±4.574 5^bcde
10	-38.362 4±0.371 7^ab	-242.331 4±0.530 5^de	-126.429 9±4.194 2^cd	-1 018.021 0±2.922 1^abcd
11	-8.495 7±0.377 8^ab	-141.184 0±0.614 7^abcde	-994.602 6±2.325 0^bc	-1 084.241 5±2.587 0^abcd
12	-76.350 6±0.898 7^ab	-103.219 1±0.645 2^abcde	-1 986.819 8±10.958 9^d	-1 747.367 0±10.034 6^def
13	50.571 3±0.160 5^a	49.380 8±0.177 4^ab	-16.238 4±0.620 6^ab	-194.714 9±0.947 0^abc
14	78.534 3±0.078 8^a	79.520 6±0.050 5^a	74.987 6±0.226 7^a	0.245 5±0.283 4^a
15	79.238 1±0.061 9^a	58.254 0±0.161 6^a	92.952 4±0.055 3^a	-27.968 3±0.483 3^a
16	24.285 7±0.275 8^ab	37.619 0±0.361 1^ab	57.619 0±0.127 0^a	-61.904 8±0.484 2^a
17	2.698 4±0.359 6^ab	-59.523 8±0.759 8^abcd	-45.952 4±0.954 2^ab	-728.651 0±1.630 9^abcd
18	13.168 5±0.145 2^ab	-8.758 2±0.549 8^abcd	-152.718 0±1.025 7^ab	-529.963 3±1.224 6^abc
19	61.976 8±0.186 6^a	83.026 3±0.105 1^a	18.013 1±0.391 9^ab	-143.183 1±0.313 0^a
20	73.029 8±0.071 3^a	59.239 4±0.167 6^a	-5.305 3±0.242 1^ab	-203.929 7±0.593 2^abc
21	76.452 4±0.051 0^a	72.904 8±0.098 8^a	11.904 8±0.294 7^ab	-433.023 8±3.070 2^abc
22	49.532 5±0.054 8^a	2.722 9±0.299 8^abcd	29.588 7±0.186 2^ab	-170.580 0±0.376 7^ab
23	25.777 8±0.172 2^ab	17.333 3±0.257 1^abc	-31.111 1±0.360 7^ab	-229.333 3±0.301 6^abc
24	-1.261 9±0.150 7^ab	-140.357 1±0.282 1^abcde	-600.761 9±1.003 7^abc	-814.809 5±1.033 1^abcd
25	-30.000 0±0.435 9^ab	-200.000 0±0.900 6^bcde	-1 266.666 7±4.604 3^cd	-2 226.666 7±7.366 1^ef
26	0.000 0±0.235 7^ab	-243.333 3±0.348 0^de	-436.666 7±0.901 2^abc	-973.333 3±1.720 5^abcd
27	-233.166 7±1.029 7^c	-727.833 3±2.425 3^f	-2 019.833 3±6.197 8^d	-2 379.500 0±7.763 8^f

试验处理 Test treatment	施药后的田间校正防效 Field correction control effect after application (%)
试验处理 Test treatment	3 d	7 d	10 d	14 d
1	60.378 9±0.114 9^ab	66.868 2±0.110 8^abcde	84.490 2±0.056 9^a	65.213 5±0.087 4^a
2	83.083 1±0.068 5^a	85.442 8±0.046 6^abcd	94.801 8±0.019 8^a	85.100 7±0.070 9^a
3	63.322 8±0.155 8^ab	86.446 3±0.032 4^abc	85.541 7±0.038 5^a	78.742 0±0.033 8^a
4	81.235 1±0.063 5^ab	90.534 4±0.021 5^ab	90.150 3±0.024 4^a	91.289 7±0.042 0^a
5	75.639 2±0.135 4^ab	75.857 9±0.066 9^abcde	85.036 4±0.058 1^a	87.851 9±0.036 2^a
6	21.191 6±0.405 2^abc	71.228 2±0.158 9^abcde	64.825 6±0.234 4^abc	64.500 1±0.192 7^a
7	29.855 1±0.273 9^abc	45.096 3±0.170 9^de	62.527 0±0.112 5^abc	25.360 8±0.165 9^a
8	-24.174 0±0.730 1^c	77.242 5±0.082 4^abcde	74.343 1±0.137 4^ab	77.165 7±0.078 1^a
9	2.383 2±0.442 9^bc	37.528 4±0.297 0^e	27.705 6±0.210 1^bcd	25.749 1±0.343 5^a
10	44.005 6±0.252 9^abc	45.390 0±0.174 9^de	21.034 3±0.322 2^cd	26.616 9±0.348 4^a
11	62.275 9±0.114 0^ab	55.351 5±0.218 9^bcde	28.242 6±0.201 0^bcd	24.297 0±0.320 3^a
12	37.224 1±0.246 9^abc	74.383 0±0.038 2^abcde	4.096 1±0.280 7^c	31.533 5±0.162 4^a
13	78.707 6±0.106 3^ab	93.090 2±0.016 7^ab	93.418 5±0.026 4^a	83.170 4±0.052 1^a
14	89.422 7±0.046 0^a	96.931 1±0.006 7^a	98.331 8±0.014 9^a	94.586 0±0.013 4^a
15	92.122 3±0.035 3^a	94.547 1±0.018 0^ab	99.243 0±0.007 2^a	93.097 8±0.025 5^a
16	71.297 2±0.150 0^ab	94.615 1±0.019 7^ab	96.683 2±0.014 2^a	90.969 6±0.040 7^a
17	62.672 3±0.190 3^ab	73.331 5±0.142 0^abcde	86.617 2±0.084 9^a	47.006 1±0.201 9^a
18	62.488 4±0.127 8^ab	76.100 0±0.167 7^abcde	83.405 6±0.083 3^a	59.503 8±0.144 2^a
19	82.321 4±0.102 0^ab	96.232 5±0.023 3^ab	93.489 3±0.040 4^a	87.414 7±0.026 3^a
20	89.297 7±0.027 9^a	91.950 0±0.048 3^ab	92.700 0±0.024 6^a	79.266 1±0.087 3^a
21	88.691 5±0.034 6^a	96.441 9±0.009 9^ab	94.045 1±0.023 7^a	60.666 1±0.312 2^a
22	78.849 6±0.006 1^ab	83.550 5±0.072 9^abcd	94.685 5±0.027 6^a	84.690 5±0.051 4^a
23	74.894 0±0.044 2^ab	84.347 0±0.079 7^abcd	91.577 0±0.025 5^a	81.019 6±0.057 7^a
24	62.463 8±0.089 3^ab	58.928 7±0.114 7^abcde	51.128 2±0.144 8^abc	43.919 0±0.195 9^a
25	39.756 0±0.301 2^abc	49.610 0±0.163 3^cde	1.809 4±0.400 7^c	-70.490 0±0.810 2^b
26	61.987 9±0.139 6^ab	47.795 3±0.115 4^cde	62.723 4±0.137 1^abc	33.017 0±0.253 8^a

Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner

10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	ZHANG Shuai, GAO Guowen, WU Lili, ZHAO Haiyan, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, DING Xinhua, LI Kemei, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of the synergistic application of seed coating agents, synergists, and micro fertilizers for the prevention and control of corn stem rot disease [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27.
[2]	ZHAO Yingying, ZHANG Jungao, LI Jin, LIANG Jing, GAO Xiangyu, GU Aixing, LIE Bin. Preliminary Study on the Synergistic Effects of Bacillus subtilis KXZ-33 and Chemical Pesticides against Cotton Fusarium wilt [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1216-1222.
[3]	WU Minhua, WU Jiaying, YU Xinhua, ZHANG Kaixuan, LU Haibo, ZHAO Haichao, LIU Zigang, HUANG Zhihong. Effects of Yuhuangjin on Microstructure and Bending Strength of Spring Maize Stem [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2402-2410.
[4]	LI Jiangyu, ZHAO Qiang, WU Xueqin, MA Chunmei, REN Ruofei, XU Doudou, TIAN Yanqing. Effects of Moulding Agent on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2352-2357.
[5]	HE Qingyu, ZHANG Jusong, DAI Jianmin, DOU Qiaoqiao, XIE Ling. Effects of Delayed Chemical Control on the Shaping of Plant Type and Yield Composition after Drought and Rehydration in Cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 11-19.
[6]	Amire Yashengjiang, Adili Shataer, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, HE Jiang, Tuershun Ahemaiti, GUO Wenchao, LI Xiaowei. Control Effects of 9 Pesticides on Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta (meyrick) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(12): 2291-2298.
[7]	. Effects of Different Control Methods in Melon-cotton Intercropping Field on Aphis gossypii (Glover) and Its Main Enemy Population Dynamics [J]. , 2015, 52(11): 2097-2102.
[8]	YANG An-pei;WANG Suo-lao;ZHANG Hang;CAO Yu;SUN Gui-rong. Study on Control Effects of Five Insecticides on Beet Stem Weevil [J]. , 2015, 52(11): 2093-2096.
[9]	BI Hai-yan;ZHU Xiao-feng;Abudukeyoumu Kader;XU Bing-qiang;YANG Sen;ZHAO Li. Field Control Effect Evaluation of Different Pesticides against Contarinia sp. [J]. , 2014, 51(5): 915-919.