“CCS种动源”处理对南瓜生长、产量和品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.04.012

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 884-890.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.04.012

• 园艺特产·农产品加工工程 • 上一篇下一篇

“CCS种动源”处理对南瓜生长、产量和品质的影响

王杰¹(), 崔西², 古力米拉·吾斯曼¹, 如则喀日·艾力¹, 秦勇¹()

1.新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆西域量子农业科技有限公司,乌鲁木齐 830000

收稿日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-04-24
通信作者: 秦勇(1962-),男,甘肃人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜栽培与生理,(E-mail)352167610@qq. com
作者简介:王杰(1997-),男,山东人,硕士研究生,研究方向为蔬菜栽培与生理,(E-mail) 2398506030@qq.com
基金资助:
自治区区域协同创新专项(科技援疆计划)(2018E02036);新疆维吾尔自治区园艺学重点学科基金(2016-10758-3);新疆农业大学 2020年度校级大学生创新项目(2020-11)

Effect of “China Construction Seed” Treatment on Pumpkin Growth, Yield and Quality

WANG Jie¹(), CUI Xi², Gulmila Wusman¹, Rozikari Aili¹, QIN Yong¹()

1. College of Forestry and Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Xinjiang Xiyu Quantum Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830000, China

Received:2021-04-16 Published:2022-04-20 Online:2022-04-24
Supported by:
The Ear-marked Fund for Regional Collaborative Innovation Project(Science and Technology Supporting Xinjiang Plan)(2018E02036);Key Discipline Foundation of Horticulture of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2016-10758-3);Innovation Project of College Students in Xinjiang Agricultural University in 2020(2020-11)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究“CCS(China Construction Seed)种动源能量波种子处理技术”对南瓜种子生长、产量和品质的影响,筛选处理南瓜种子的最适方法。【方法】以南瓜品种“银冠”为材料,分别设置12、24、36 h的不浸种处理以及浸种8 h后处理12 h,共计4个处理。分析不同处理对南瓜生长发育、产量和品质的影响。【结果】T₂处理(不浸种处理24 h)和T₃处理(不浸种处理36 h)的南瓜生长期间的株高、茎粗、叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)指标优于对照处理,果肉中干物质含量、可溶性糖和淀粉含量与对照无明显差异,产量与对照相比分别提高了20.89 %和21.99 %。【结论】使用“CCS种动源”技术处理南瓜种子24和36 h,在保证南瓜品质的前提下,提高南瓜产量具有明显效果。

关键词: 南瓜; 种子处理; 生长发育; 产量; 品质

Abstract:

【Objective】 To screen out the best method for processing pumpkin seeds, pumpkin seeds using the "China Construction Seed energy wave seed treatment technology".【Method】 The pumpkin variety "Yinguan" was taken as the research material and four levels of 12 h, 24 h, 36 h non-soaking dry seed treatment and 8 h post-soaking seed treatment 12 h, totaling 4 treatments were designed to study the effects of different treatments on pumpkin growth, yield and quality, under other consistent cultivation conditions.【Result】 The plant height, stem thickness, and relative content of chlorophyll(SPAD value) in pumpkins of T₂ treatment (non-soaking dry seed treatment 24 h) and T₃ treatment (non-soaking dry seed treatment 36 h) were better than the that of the control treatment during the growth period.The dry matter content, soluble sugar and starch content in the pulp had no significant difference with the control.Compared with the control, the yield increased by 20.89% and 21.99%, respectively.【Conclusion】 Using the "China Construction Seed" technology to treat pumpkin seeds for 24 h and 36 h has a significant effect on increasing the yield of pumpkin, under the premise of ensuring the quality of the pumpkin.The test results provide a reference for high-yield pumpkin planting.

Key words: pumpkin; seed treatment; growth and development; yield; quality

中图分类号:

S642.1

王杰, 崔西, 古力米拉·吾斯曼, 如则喀日·艾力, 秦勇. “CCS种动源”处理对南瓜生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 884-890.

WANG Jie, CUI Xi, Gulmila Wusman, Rozikari Aili, QIN Yong. Effect of “China Construction Seed” Treatment on Pumpkin Growth, Yield and Quality[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 884-890.

图/表 3

参考文献 29

[1]	王建云. 南瓜营养价值及早春设施栽培技术[J]. 蔬菜, 2014,(7):42-43.
	WANG Jianyun. Nutritional value of pumpkin and cultivation techniques in early spring[J]. Vegetables, 2014,(7):42-43.
[2]	罗双群, 张桂红, 陈海伟, 等. 南瓜功能特性研究进展[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2012,(4):47-49.
	LUO Shuangqun, ZHANG Guihong, CHEN Haiwei, et al. Research advance in functional characteristics of pumpkin[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2012,(4):47-49.
[3]	常慧萍. 南瓜多糖的降血脂作用研究[J]. 生物学杂志, 2008, 25(3) :57-59.
	CHANG Huiping. Studies of pumpkin polysaccharides on decreasing blood lipids[J]. Journal of Biology, 2008, 25(3):57-59.
[4]	包晓玮, 常永志, 朱金芳, 等. 南瓜及红甜菜多糖对小鼠免疫功能的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2011, 32(8): 126-129.
	BAO Xiaowei, CHANG Yongzhi, ZHU Jinfang, et al. Effects of pumpkin polycose and beetroot polycosepolycoseonimmune function of mice[J]. Food Research and Development, 2011, 32(8):126-129.
[5]	孙婕, 申娟利, 吕灵娟, 等. 3种提取方法对南瓜多糖得率及抗氧化性质的影响[J]. 农产品加工, 2011, (8): 38-40.
	SUN Jie, SHEN Juanli, LÜ Lingjuan, et al. Effects of three extracting methods for the rate and antioxidant properties of pumpkin polysaccharides[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2011,(8):38-40.
[6]	屈春勇. 蔬菜种子处理技术研究进展[J]. 河南农业, 2019,(5):14-15.
	QU Chunyong. Research progress of vegetable seed treatment technology[J]. Agriculture of Henan, 2019,(5):14-15.
[7]	沈颖, 黄智文, 田永红, 等. 蔬菜种子处理技术研究进展[J]. 中国种业, 2016,(2):10-13.
	SHEN Ying, HUANG Zhiwen, TIAN Yonghong, et al. Research progress of vegetable seed treatment technology[J]. China Seed Industry, 2016,(2):10-13.
[8]	刘山, 欧阳西荣, 聂荣邦. 物理方法在作物种子处理中的应用现状与发展趋势[J]. 作物研究, 2007,(S1):520-524.
	LIU Shan, OUYANG Xirong, NIE Rongbang. Application status and development trend of physical methods in crop seed treatment[J]. Crop Research, 2007,(S1):520-524.
[9]	黄芸萍, 张华峰, 古斌权, 等. 南瓜砧木种子干热处理试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(5):791-793.
	HUANG Yunping, ZHANG Huafeng, GU Binquan, et al. Research on dry-heat treatment of pumpkin rootstocks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(5):791-793.
[10]	李贞霞, 林紫玉, 沈军, 等. 超低温处理对南瓜种子萌发的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(4):363-366.
	LI Zhenxia, LIN Ziyu, SHEN Jun, et al. Effect of excessively low temperature conservation on germination of pumpkin seeds[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2009, 18(4):363-366.
[11]	蒋燕, 郝文利, 田野. 液氮保存对南瓜种子生理生化特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2009,(2):77-79.
	JIANG Yan, HAO Wenli, TIAN Ye. Influence on physiological and biochemical characteristics of pumpkin seeds after cryopreservation abstract[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2009,(2):77-79.
[12]	赵根, 陈银华, 徐坚, 等. 高压静电场在巨型南瓜种子上的应用初探[J]. 江西农业学报, 2006,(4):110-111.
	ZHAO Gen, CHEN Yinhua, XU Jian, et al. Preliminary study on the application of high voltage electrostatic field on giant pumpkin seeds[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2006,(4):110-111.
[13]	方向前, 赵洪祥, 曹文明, 等. 等离子体处理对无壳南瓜种子生物学性状及产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(19):8955-8956.
	FANG Xiangqian, ZHAO Hongxiang, CAO Wenming, et al. Effects of plasma treatment on biological traits and yield of summer squash (Cucumissatiuus L.) seed[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(19):8955-8956.
[14]	田月娥, 车志平, 刘圣明, 等. 微波处理对8种瓜类种子萌发的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(7):126-130.
	TIAN Yuee, CHE Zhiping, LIU Shengming, et al. Effect of microwave treatment on seed germination of eight kinds of gourds[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(7): 126-130.
[15]	白亚乡, 胡玉才, 迟建卫. 物理技术在农业生产中的应用进展[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003,(3):232-235.
	BAI Yaxiang, HU Yucai, CHI Jianwei. Application progress of phycicaltechniques in agriculture[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2003,(3):232-235.
[16]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验技术与原理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI Hesheng. Techniques and Principles of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[17]	刘宜生, 王长林, 王迎杰, 等. 早熟南瓜吉祥1号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2001,(1):29-30.
	LIU Yisheng, WANG Changlin, WANG Yingjie, et al. A new winter squash F₁ hybrid-‘Jixiang No.1’[J]. China Vegetables, 2001,(1):29-30.
[18]	萧浪涛, 王三根. 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005: 98-112.
	XIAO Langtao, WANG Sangen. Plant Physiology [M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press of China, 2005: 98-112.
[19]	宋廷宇, 吴春燕, 常雪, 等. 西葫芦叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量相关性分析[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2014, 39(3):67-70.
	SONG Tingyu, WU Chunyan, CHANG Xue, et al. Analysis on correlation between leaf SPAD value and chlorophyll content of squash[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 39(3):67-70.
[20]	王宣仓. 3个南瓜品种苗期形态指标比较试验[J]. 蔬菜, 2016,(9):15-18.
	WANG Xuancang. Comparison test of three pumpkin varieties' morphological indexes at seedling stage[J]. Vegetables, 2016,(9):15-18.
[21]	唐军, 王东兴, 沟丽红, 等. 种子磁化处理促生增产效果试验[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2009,(1):82-83.
	TANG Jun, WANG Dongxing, GOU Lihong, et al. Effect of seed magnetization treatment on promoting growth and yield[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology and Equipment, 2009,(1):82-83.
[22]	刘岩一, 董科, 王溯, 等. 花生种子磁化处理试验研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014,(5):99-100.
	LIU Yanyi, DONG Ke, WANG Suo, et al. Experimental study on magnetization treatment of peanut seeds[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014,(5):99-100.
[23]	龙荣华, 沙毓沧, 浦恩达, 等. 南瓜良种良法配套栽培技术[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2018, 31(8):62-63.
	LONG Ronghua, SHA Yucang, PU Enda, et al. Cultivation techniques of pumpkin varieties[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2018, 31(8):62-63.
[24]	程利峰, 戴思慧, 陈绍祥, 等. 不同施肥方式对南瓜生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2019, 32(9):22-24.
	CHENG Lifeng, DAI Sihui, CHEN Shaoxiang, et al. Effects of different fertilization methods on growth, yield and quality of pumpkin[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2019, 32(9):22-24.
[25]	孙小武. 2014年度南瓜产业技术发展报告[C]// 中国园艺学会南瓜研究分会籽用南瓜产业发展经验交流会暨学术研讨会论文集, 2015.
	SUN Xiaowu. Pumpkin Industry Technology Development Report[C] // Proceedings of the Seed Pumpkin Industry Development Experience Exchange Meeting and Academic Symposium of the Pumpkin Research Branch of the Chinese Horticultural Society, 2014.
[26]	魏淇茏, 刘新平. 新疆耕地生态安全动态变化分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(4):5-7.
	WEI Qilong, LIU Xinping. Analysis on the dynamic changes of Xinjiang farmland ecological security[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(4):5-7.
[27]	耿德仁. 农作物种子磁化技术的推广与应用[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2011,(24):38-40.
	GENG Deren. Popularization and application of crop seed magnetization technology[J]. Agricultural Technology & Equipment, 2011,(24):38-40.
[28]	俞金龙, 徐丽珊, 郁金中, 等. 南瓜果实发育和储藏过程中碳水化合物代谢的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2010, 22(3):341-344.
	YU Jinlong, XU Lishan, YU Jinzhong, et al. Changes of carbohydrate metabolism within growth and storage process of pumpkin fruit[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2010, 22(3):341-344.
[29]	孙玉良. 黄瓜、南瓜和瓠瓜种子发育过程中生理生化指标的研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2012.
	SUN Yuliang. The study on development and indicators of physiological and biochemical of cucumber, pumpkin and cucurbit abstract[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2012.

处理 Treat ment	茎粗 Stem diameter(cm)			蔓长 Vine(cm)
处理 Treat ment	抽蔓期 Vine period	开花期 Anthesis	采收期 Harvest period	开花期 Anthesis	采收期 Harvest period	抽蔓期 Vine period	开花期 Anthesis
T₀	17.90±0.12^b	22.79±0.09^b	23.68±0.22^c	227.39±1.11^c	525.00±1.26^c	68.21±1.56^b	106.96±0.26^a
T₁	17.96±0.08^b	21.84±0.08^c	24.35±0.15^bc	238.00±0.10^b	549.33±2.19^c	63.68±0.75^c	106.29±0.59^a
T₂	17.97±0.73^b	23.45±0.21^a	25.19±0.20^a	237.06±0.57^b	642.33±5.81^a	70.43±0.06^b	97.64±0.47^b
T₃	18.08±0.12^b	23.01±0.23^ab	24.64±0.20^ab	238.67±1.17^b	588.00±13.65^b	61.52±0.25^c	106.93±0.64^a
T₄	19.22±0.12^a	23.12±0.15^ab	24.62±0.29^ab	247.83±1.11^a	663.00±11.01^a	78.31±0.81^a	107.08±0.57^a

处理 Treat ment	茎粗 Stem diameter(cm)			蔓长 Vine(cm)
处理 Treat ment	抽蔓期 Vine period	开花期 Anthesis	采收期 Harvest period	开花期 Anthesis	采收期 Harvest period	抽蔓期 Vine period	开花期 Anthesis
T₀	17.90±0.12^b	22.79±0.09^b	23.68±0.22^c	227.39±1.11^c	525.00±1.26^c	68.21±1.56^b	106.96±0.26^a
T₁	17.96±0.08^b	21.84±0.08^c	24.35±0.15^bc	238.00±0.10^b	549.33±2.19^c	63.68±0.75^c	106.29±0.59^a
T₂	17.97±0.73^b	23.45±0.21^a	25.19±0.20^a	237.06±0.57^b	642.33±5.81^a	70.43±0.06^b	97.64±0.47^b
T₃	18.08±0.12^b	23.01±0.23^ab	24.64±0.20^ab	238.67±1.17^b	588.00±13.65^b	61.52±0.25^c	106.93±0.64^a
T₄	19.22±0.12^a	23.12±0.15^ab	24.62±0.29^ab	247.83±1.11^a	663.00±11.01^a	78.31±0.81^a	107.08±0.57^a

处理 Treat ment	单株结果数 Number of results per plant (a)	坐果节位 Fruit set position (a)	单果重 Fruit weight (kg)	单株产量 Yield per plant (kg)	小区产量 35 m²yield (kg)	产量Yield (kg/667 m²)
T₀	1.83±0.02^c	8.22±0.11^a	1.71±0.00^d	3.64±0.09^b	145.60	2 774.42
T₁	2.28±0.04^b	7.39±0.15^bc	1.99±0.02^bc	4.13±0.31^ab	165.20	3 148.24
T₂	2.22±0.04^b	7.11±0.11^c	2.03±0.03^b	4.40±0.21^a	176.00	3 354.06
T₃	2.50±0.10^a	7.33±0.10^bc	2.16±0.04^a	4.44±0.13^a	177.60	3 384.55
T₄	2.00±0.04^c	7.61±0.06^b	1.91±0.03^c	4.20±0.10^ab	168.00	3 201.60

处理 Treat ment	单株结果数 Number of results per plant (a)	坐果节位 Fruit set position (a)	单果重 Fruit weight (kg)	单株产量 Yield per plant (kg)	小区产量 35 m²yield (kg)	产量Yield (kg/667 m²)
T₀	1.83±0.02^c	8.22±0.11^a	1.71±0.00^d	3.64±0.09^b	145.60	2 774.42
T₁	2.28±0.04^b	7.39±0.15^bc	1.99±0.02^bc	4.13±0.31^ab	165.20	3 148.24
T₂	2.22±0.04^b	7.11±0.11^c	2.03±0.03^b	4.40±0.21^a	176.00	3 354.06
T₃	2.50±0.10^a	7.33±0.10^bc	2.16±0.04^a	4.44±0.13^a	177.60	3 384.55
T₄	2.00±0.04^c	7.61±0.06^b	1.91±0.03^c	4.20±0.10^ab	168.00	3 201.60

处理 Treat ment	纵径 Vertical diameter (mm)	横径 Transverse diameter (mm)	含水量 Water content (%)	干物质含量 Dry matter content (%)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%)	可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg/g)	淀粉 Starch (%)
T₀	113.96±1.18^d	173.38±0.85^b	79.09	20.91±0.00^c	26.00±0.00^c	9.50±0.32^a	4.64±0.00^d
T₁	118.18±0.73^c	181.25±0.79^a	80.07	19.93±0.00^d	27.07±0.00^a	4.71±0.29^b	8.48±0.00^a
T₂	120.30±0.36^a	182.11±0.52^a	77.20	22.80±0.00^b	26.03±0.00^c	5.38±0.40^b	5.72±0.00^b
T₃	119.54±0.46^ab	182.92±0.46^a	78.23	21.77±0.00^c	25.80±0.00^c	5.25±0.29^b	4.59±0.00^d
T₄	118.66±0.17^bc	182.75±0.54^a	73.54	26.47±0.00^a	26.47±0.00^b	5.43±0.26^b	5.37±0.00^c

“CCS种动源”处理对南瓜生长、产量和品质的影响

Effect of “China Construction Seed” Treatment on Pumpkin Growth, Yield and Quality

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	靳娟, 李丽莉, 杨磊, 樊丁宇, 郝庆. 新疆红枣产业发展现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110.
[2]	方辉, 丁银灯, 范贵强, 高永红, 黄天荣. 新疆南疆小麦产业发展的现状及品质特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80.
[3]	杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 彭云承, 达吾来·杰克山, 冯国瑞, 唐式敏. 鲜食糯玉米籽粒营养品质的差异变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093.
[4]	张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[5]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[6]	黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[7]	王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[8]	张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[9]	刘晶, 杜明川, 张文婷, 鲍海娟, 景美玲, 杜文华. 青海不同地区小黑麦种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190.
[10]	田海燕, 张占琴, 颉建辉, 王建江, 杨相昆. 加工番茄果实番茄红素与主要品质性状的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202.
[11]	张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[12]	陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[13]	乔雅洁, 付慧鑫, 乔雪, 孟新涛, 张婷, 潘俨. 不同贮藏温度条件下鲜牛肉品质的变化规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2323-2329.
[14]	张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[15]	候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.