

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (11): 2722-2732.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.11.013
李志鹏1(
), 杨鹏年1(
), 张胜江2, 盛统民2, 冶秉瑞1, 袁凯1, 王永鹏1
收稿日期:2024-03-11
出版日期:2024-11-20
发布日期:2025-01-08
通信作者:
杨鹏年(1966-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为干旱区地下水资源利用,(E-mail)ypn10@163.com作者简介:李志鹏(1999-),男,河南汝州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业节水灌溉,(E-mail)1173763471@qq.com
基金资助:
LI Zhipeng1(
), YANG Pengnian1(
), ZHANG Shengjiang2, SHENGTongmin 2, YE Bingrui1, YUAN Kai1, WANG Yongpeng1
Received:2024-03-11
Published:2024-11-20
Online:2025-01-08
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】探究灌排协同下冬灌对盐碱土壤的水盐调控效应。【方法】基于野外测箱试验,设置2种地下水埋深:G1(2 m)、G2(3 m)和2种灌水方式:W1(冬灌)、W2(非冬灌),研究不同灌水方式下土壤冻融特征,非生育期土壤返盐特征,灌排协同下冬灌的盐分淋洗效率、排水排盐效率,棉花出苗及苗期生长状况。【结果】冬灌延迟了土壤日冻融循环和日消融循环,且冬灌后冻融、消融持续时间比非冬灌短。土壤完全冻结期随着土层深度增加在冻结时间上滞后,冻结持续时间变短;冬灌可有效淋洗土壤0~60 cm土层的盐分,且2 m埋深排水排盐量大于3 m;翌年播种前冬灌和非冬灌土壤盐分在0~20 cm土层聚集的差异显著,非冬灌土壤盐分高于冬灌。相同灌水方式下,2 m埋深的表层返盐量大于3 m;相同地下水埋深,冬灌返盐程度低于非冬灌;翌年滴水出苗后棉花出苗及苗期生长差异显著,冬灌后翌年滴水出苗的出苗率和苗蕾期长势优于非冬灌后滴水出苗处理。【结论】冬灌可降低气-土界面土壤温度势差,减少0~20 cm土壤冻融交替持续时间,抑制土壤返盐,翌年滴水出苗更有利于棉花促生保苗。灌排协同下,地下排水埋深越大,排水携盐效率越低;灌区在入冬期可利用潜水蒸发与返盐同步变弱的自然特征,通过冬灌将盐分淋洗至地下水中;春季升温期则适时抽取地下水,通过降低地下水位来抑制土壤表层快速返盐,达到灌排协同控制盐分的目标。
中图分类号:
李志鹏, 杨鹏年, 张胜江, 盛统民, 冶秉瑞, 袁凯, 王永鹏. 灌排协同下冬灌期土壤水盐调控效应分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2722-2732.
LI Zhipeng, YANG Pengnian, ZHANG Shengjiang, SHENGTongmin , YE Bingrui, YUAN Kai, WANG Yongpeng. Study on soil water and salt regulation under irrigation and drainage coordination in winter irrigation period[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2722-2732.
| 灌水方式 Irrigation method | 地下水位 Groundwater depth(m) | 冬灌定额 Winter irrigation quota(mm) | 翌年滴水 出苗定额 The following year's drip quota (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌 Winter irrigation | 2 | 210 | 67.50+15 |
| 非冬灌 Non-winter irrigation | 2 | 0 | 67.50+45 |
| 冬灌 Winter irrigation | 3 | 210 | 67.50+15 |
| 非冬灌 Non-winter irrigation | 3 | 0 | 67.50+45 |
表1 不同地下水埋深和灌水方式水盐调控试验设计
Tab.1 Experimental design of water and salt regulation for different groundwater depth and irrigation methods
| 灌水方式 Irrigation method | 地下水位 Groundwater depth(m) | 冬灌定额 Winter irrigation quota(mm) | 翌年滴水 出苗定额 The following year's drip quota (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌 Winter irrigation | 2 | 210 | 67.50+15 |
| 非冬灌 Non-winter irrigation | 2 | 0 | 67.50+45 |
| 冬灌 Winter irrigation | 3 | 210 | 67.50+15 |
| 非冬灌 Non-winter irrigation | 3 | 0 | 67.50+45 |
| 土壤深度 Soil depth (cm) | 灌水方式 Irrigation method | 冬季日冻融循环 Winter daily freeze-thaw cycle | 完全冻结期 Complete freezing period | 春季日消融循环 Spring diurnal ablation cycle | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 起止日期 Start-stop date (M/D) | 持续时间 Duration(d) | 起止日期 Start-stop date (M/D) | 持续时间 Duration(d) | 起止日期 Start-stop date (M/D) | 持续时间 Duration(d) | ||
| 10 | 冬灌 | 11/26~11/28 | 3 | 11/29~翌年2/19 | 83 | 翌年2/20~2/26 | 7 |
| 非冬灌 | 11/18~11/28 | 11 | 11/29~翌年2/06 | 70 | 翌年2/07~2/26 | 20 | |
| 20 | 冬灌 | 11/30~翌年2/22 | 85 | 翌年2/23~2/25 | 3 | ||
| 非冬灌 | 11/29~翌年2/10 | 74 | 翌年2/11~2/18 | 8 | |||
| 30 | 冬灌 | 12/04~翌年2/25 | 84 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 11/30~翌年2/15 | 78 | |||||
| 40 | 冬灌 | 12/07~翌年2/25 | 81 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/02~翌年2/15 | 76 | |||||
| 60 | 冬灌 | 12/14~翌年2/23 | 72 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/11~翌年2/16 | 68 | |||||
| 80 | 冬灌 | 12/22~翌年2/21 | 62 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/22~翌年2/16 | 57 | |||||
| 100 | 冬灌 | 12/28~翌年2/18 | 53 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/28~翌年2/17 | 52 | |||||
表2 土壤冻融持续时间
Tab.2 Soil freeze-thaw duration schedule
| 土壤深度 Soil depth (cm) | 灌水方式 Irrigation method | 冬季日冻融循环 Winter daily freeze-thaw cycle | 完全冻结期 Complete freezing period | 春季日消融循环 Spring diurnal ablation cycle | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 起止日期 Start-stop date (M/D) | 持续时间 Duration(d) | 起止日期 Start-stop date (M/D) | 持续时间 Duration(d) | 起止日期 Start-stop date (M/D) | 持续时间 Duration(d) | ||
| 10 | 冬灌 | 11/26~11/28 | 3 | 11/29~翌年2/19 | 83 | 翌年2/20~2/26 | 7 |
| 非冬灌 | 11/18~11/28 | 11 | 11/29~翌年2/06 | 70 | 翌年2/07~2/26 | 20 | |
| 20 | 冬灌 | 11/30~翌年2/22 | 85 | 翌年2/23~2/25 | 3 | ||
| 非冬灌 | 11/29~翌年2/10 | 74 | 翌年2/11~2/18 | 8 | |||
| 30 | 冬灌 | 12/04~翌年2/25 | 84 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 11/30~翌年2/15 | 78 | |||||
| 40 | 冬灌 | 12/07~翌年2/25 | 81 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/02~翌年2/15 | 76 | |||||
| 60 | 冬灌 | 12/14~翌年2/23 | 72 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/11~翌年2/16 | 68 | |||||
| 80 | 冬灌 | 12/22~翌年2/21 | 62 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/22~翌年2/16 | 57 | |||||
| 100 | 冬灌 | 12/28~翌年2/18 | 53 | ||||
| 非冬灌 | 12/28~翌年2/17 | 52 | |||||
| 盐分通量 边界 Salt flux boundary (cm) | G1W1 | G1W2 | G2W1 | G2W2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigationuntil early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | |
| 0 | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | -180.06 | 88.97 | 254.87 | -172.91 | 66.45 | 183.65 |
| 10 | -200.92 | 95.07 | 265.65 | -194.53 | 80.43 | 189.68 |
| 20 | -217.56 | 98.53 | 292.60 | -224.97 | 86.90 | 215.82 |
| 30 | -242.28 | 117.91 | 305.79 | -285.50 | 87.24 | 237.49 |
| 40 | -287.59 | 147.38 | 317.11 | -319.82 | 87.58 | 260.90 |
| 60 | -355.66 | 203.97 | 449.22 | -347.26 | 85.44 | 355.64 |
| 80 | -346.53 | 204.49 | 578.01 | -339.92 | 82.33 | 489.50 |
| 100 | -311.75 | 216.67 | 662.39 | -314.91 | 69.53 | 572.53 |
| 100处 盐分净通量 Net salt flux at 100 | -95.08 | 662.39 | -245.38 | 572.53 | ||
表3 各处理不同土层盐分通量
Tab.3 Salt flux of different soil layers in each treatment(g·m2)
| 盐分通量 边界 Salt flux boundary (cm) | G1W1 | G1W2 | G2W1 | G2W2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigationuntil early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | |
| 0 | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | -180.06 | 88.97 | 254.87 | -172.91 | 66.45 | 183.65 |
| 10 | -200.92 | 95.07 | 265.65 | -194.53 | 80.43 | 189.68 |
| 20 | -217.56 | 98.53 | 292.60 | -224.97 | 86.90 | 215.82 |
| 30 | -242.28 | 117.91 | 305.79 | -285.50 | 87.24 | 237.49 |
| 40 | -287.59 | 147.38 | 317.11 | -319.82 | 87.58 | 260.90 |
| 60 | -355.66 | 203.97 | 449.22 | -347.26 | 85.44 | 355.64 |
| 80 | -346.53 | 204.49 | 578.01 | -339.92 | 82.33 | 489.50 |
| 100 | -311.75 | 216.67 | 662.39 | -314.91 | 69.53 | 572.53 |
| 100处 盐分净通量 Net salt flux at 100 | -95.08 | 662.39 | -245.38 | 572.53 | ||
| 盐储量 变化范围 Salt flux boundary (cm) | G1W1 | G1W2 | G2W1 | G2W2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigationuntil early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | |
| 0~5 | -30.96 | 88.97 | 254.87 | -23.81 | 66.45 | 183.65 |
| 5~10 | -20.86 | 6.10 | 10.78 | -21.62 | 13.98 | 6.03 |
| 10~20 | -16.63 | 3.46 | 26.95 | -30.44 | 6.47 | 26.14 |
| 20~30 | -24.73 | 19.38 | 13.19 | -60.53 | 0.33 | 21.67 |
| 30~40 | -45.30 | 29.48 | 11.32 | -34.32 | 0.35 | 23.40 |
| 40~60 | -68.07 | 56.58 | 132.11 | -27.44 | -2.14 | 94.74 |
| 60~80 | 9.13 | 0.53 | 128.79 | 7.34 | -3.11 | 133.86 |
| 80~100 | 34.78 | 12.18 | 84.38 | 25.01 | -12.80 | 83.03 |
| 100至 地下水位 100 cm to the water table | -461.58 | -201.19 | -637.95 | 136.91 | -67.68 | -556.07 |
| 排水盐量 The amount of salt contained in the drain water | 773.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 178.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 补水盐量 The amount of salt contained in the make-up water | 0.00 | -15.48 | -24.44 | 0.00 | -1.85 | -16.46 |
| 灌水盐量 The amount of salt contained in irrigation water | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
表4 不同处理各时期盐储量变化
Tab.4 Changes of salt reserves in different periods under different treatments(g)
| 盐储量 变化范围 Salt flux boundary (cm) | G1W1 | G1W2 | G2W1 | G2W2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigationuntil early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 冬灌后 Before and after winter irrigation | 冬灌后至 翌年4月初 After winter irrigation until early April of the following year | 冬灌前至 翌年4月初 Before winter irrigation until early April of the following year | |
| 0~5 | -30.96 | 88.97 | 254.87 | -23.81 | 66.45 | 183.65 |
| 5~10 | -20.86 | 6.10 | 10.78 | -21.62 | 13.98 | 6.03 |
| 10~20 | -16.63 | 3.46 | 26.95 | -30.44 | 6.47 | 26.14 |
| 20~30 | -24.73 | 19.38 | 13.19 | -60.53 | 0.33 | 21.67 |
| 30~40 | -45.30 | 29.48 | 11.32 | -34.32 | 0.35 | 23.40 |
| 40~60 | -68.07 | 56.58 | 132.11 | -27.44 | -2.14 | 94.74 |
| 60~80 | 9.13 | 0.53 | 128.79 | 7.34 | -3.11 | 133.86 |
| 80~100 | 34.78 | 12.18 | 84.38 | 25.01 | -12.80 | 83.03 |
| 100至 地下水位 100 cm to the water table | -461.58 | -201.19 | -637.95 | 136.91 | -67.68 | -556.07 |
| 排水盐量 The amount of salt contained in the drain water | 773.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 178.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 补水盐量 The amount of salt contained in the make-up water | 0.00 | -15.48 | -24.44 | 0.00 | -1.85 | -16.46 |
| 灌水盐量 The amount of salt contained in irrigation water | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -149.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 灌水方式 Irrigation method | 地下水 埋深 Groun- dwater depth (m) | 根层电导率 Root layer conductivity (ms/cm) | 根层含水率 Root layer moisture content (%) | 出苗率 Emergence rate (%) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 叶片数 Number of blades (片/株) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌 Winter irrigation | 2 | 1.85±0.67a | 10.55±1.65a | 91.58±2.22a | 23.09±3.66a | 4.69±0.36a | 11.40±1.46a |
| 3 | 1.44±0.06a | 8.32±0.63a | 89.03±0.72a | 30.28±4.41a | 5.05±0.59a | 13.40±2.73a | |
| 非冬灌 Non-winter irrigation | 2 | 4.87±0.81a | 10.38±0.33a | 51.40±6.93a | 15.97±2.98a | 3.27±0.61a | 7.90±0.97a |
| 3 | 4.00±0.94a | 7.20±0.51b | 63.15±1.36a | 17.96±1.93a | 3.98±0.33a | 10.80±1.17a | |
| 灌水方式 Irrigation method | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| 地下水埋深 Groundwater depth | ns | ** | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
| 灌水方式×地下水位 Irrigation method and Groundwater depth | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | |
表5 不同埋深与灌水处理棉花出苗率及苗期植株生长
Tab.5 Cotton seedling emergence rate and plant growth at seedling stage under different burying depth and irrigation treatment
| 灌水方式 Irrigation method | 地下水 埋深 Groun- dwater depth (m) | 根层电导率 Root layer conductivity (ms/cm) | 根层含水率 Root layer moisture content (%) | 出苗率 Emergence rate (%) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 叶片数 Number of blades (片/株) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冬灌 Winter irrigation | 2 | 1.85±0.67a | 10.55±1.65a | 91.58±2.22a | 23.09±3.66a | 4.69±0.36a | 11.40±1.46a |
| 3 | 1.44±0.06a | 8.32±0.63a | 89.03±0.72a | 30.28±4.41a | 5.05±0.59a | 13.40±2.73a | |
| 非冬灌 Non-winter irrigation | 2 | 4.87±0.81a | 10.38±0.33a | 51.40±6.93a | 15.97±2.98a | 3.27±0.61a | 7.90±0.97a |
| 3 | 4.00±0.94a | 7.20±0.51b | 63.15±1.36a | 17.96±1.93a | 3.98±0.33a | 10.80±1.17a | |
| 灌水方式 Irrigation method | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| 地下水埋深 Groundwater depth | ns | ** | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
| 灌水方式×地下水位 Irrigation method and Groundwater depth | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | |
| [1] | 王海江. 玛纳斯河流域土壤盐渍化过程和格局特征及盐渍土改良模式探讨[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014. |
| WANG Haijiang. Processes, Patterns and Reclamation of Soil Salinization at Manas River Basin, Xinjiang, China[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014. | |
| [2] | 王少丽, 王修贵, 丁昆仑, 等. 中国的农田排水技术进展与研究展望[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2008, 27(1): 108-111. |
| WANG Shaoli, WANG Xiugui, DING Kunlun, et al. Advancement and prospect of farmland drainage in China[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2008, 27(1): 108-111. | |
| [3] | 崔亚莉, 张德强, 邵景力, 等. 地下水浅埋区土壤水TDS变化规律分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(1): 185-188. |
| CUI Yali, ZHANG Deqiang, SHAO Jingli, et al. Study on variation and influence factor of soil-water TDS in shallow groundwater areas[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2004, 18(1): 185-188. | |
| [4] | Mahmood K, Morris J, Collopy J, et al. Groundwater uptake and sustainability of farm plantations on saline sites in Punjab Province, Pakistan[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2001, 48(1): 1-20. |
| [5] | Ceuppens J, Wopereis M C S. Impact of non-drained irrigated rice cropping on soil salinization in the Senegal River Delta[J]. Geoderma, 1999, 92(1/2): 125-140. |
| [6] | 赵波, 王振华, 李文昊. 滴灌方式及定额对北疆冬灌棉田土壤水盐分布及次年棉花生长的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(6): 139-148. |
| ZHAO Bo,WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao. Effects of winter drip irrigation mode and quota on water and salt distribution in cotton field soil and cotton growth next year in northern Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(6): 139-148. | |
| [7] | Liu Z P, Jiao X Y, Lu S H, et al. Effects of winter irrigation on soil salinity and jujube growth in arid regions[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(6): e0218622. |
| [8] | Liu M X, Yang J S, Li X M, et al. Distribution and dynamics of soil water and salt under different drip irrigation regimes in Northwest China[J]. Irrigation Science, 2013, 31(4): 675-688. |
| [9] | Chen W P, Hou Z N, Wu L S, et al. Evaluating salinity distribution in soil irrigated with saline water in arid regions of Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(12): 2001-2008. |
| [10] | 杜建民, 王占军, 俞鸿千, 等. 苜蓿草田地下滴灌适宜冬灌量[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(1): 166-172. |
| DU Jianmin, WANG Zhanjun, YU Hongqian, et al. Optimum winter irrigation amount of subsurface drip irrigation in alfalfa grassland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(1): 166-172. | |
| [11] | BahçeciĪ,Nacar A S. Subsurface drainage and salt leaching in irrigated land in south-east Turkey[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2009, 58(3): 346-356. |
| [12] | 张展羽, 张月珍, 张洁, 等. 基于DRAINMOD-S模型的滨海盐碱地农田暗管排水模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(6): 782-788. |
| ZHANG Zhanyu, ZHANG Yuezhen, ZHANG Jie, et al. Simulating subsurface pipe drainage in saline-alkali farmland along coastlines using the DRAINMOD-S model[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(6): 782-788. | |
| [13] | 张丽, 焦平金, 董勤各, 等. 暗管间距和埋深对田间水盐运移变化的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(0-9):92-101. |
| Zhang Li, Jiao Pingjin, Dong Qinge, et al. Effects of tube spacing and buried depth on field water and salt migration[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage: 2023, 42(0-9):92-101. | |
| [14] | 王振华, 衡通, 李文昊, 等. 滴灌条件下排水暗管间距对土壤盐分淋洗的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(8): 253-261. |
| WANG Zhenhua, HENG Tong, LI Wenhao, et al. Effects of drainage pipe spacing on soil salinity leaching under drip irrigation condition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(8): 253-261. | |
| [15] | 秦文豹, 李明思, 李玉芳, 等. 滴灌条件下暗管滤层结构对排水、排盐效果的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(7): 80-85. |
| QIN Wenbao, LI Mingsi, LI Yufang, et al. Proposed gravel filters for pipe-drain to improve the efficacy of the drainage system under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 36(7): 80-85. | |
| [16] | 钱颖志, 朱焱, 伍靖伟, 等. 考虑排盐和控盐的干旱区暗管布局参数研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(13): 74-83. |
| QIAN Yingzhi, ZHU Yan, WU Jingwei, et al. Subsurface drains layout in arid areas with purposes of salt control and discharge[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(13): 74-83. | |
| [17] | 李杰, 王红雨, 马俊毅, 等. 基于渗流槽试验的吸附性外包滤料改善暗管排水脱盐效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(16):121-130. |
| Li Jie, Wang Hongyu, Ma Junyi, et al. Improvement of desalting effect of closed pipe drainage by adsorbent filter material based on seepage tank test[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(16):121-130. | |
| [18] | 李彦鑫, 徐丽, 齐菲, 等. 滨海盐碱农田暗管排盐渗流场模拟[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2023, 31(7): 1110-1120. |
| LI Yanxin, XU Li, QI Fei, et al. Seepage field simulation of subsurface pipe salt drainage processes in coastal saline-alkali farmland[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(7): 1110-1120. | |
| [19] | 陈文岭. 微咸水膜下滴灌棉花根系—水—盐—微量元素相互作用研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2018. |
| CHEN Wenling. Study on the Interactions of Cotton Root-soil Moisture-salinity-trace Element under Mulched Drip Irrigation with Brackish Water[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2018. | |
| [20] | 王康. 磁化水灌溉模式对土壤水盐分布与棉花生长影响[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2021. |
| WANG Kang. Effect of Magnetized Water Irrigation Mode on Soil Water and Salt Distribution and Cotton Growth[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2021. | |
| [21] | 曹伟, 张胜江, 张明. 基于灰色关联分析的地下水化学成分特征[J]. 节水灌溉, 2009,(8): 7-9. |
| CAO Wei,ZHANG Shengjiang, ZHANG Ming. Analysis of groundwater chemical composition characteristic based on gray relation analysis[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2009,(8): 7-9. | |
| [22] | 彭振阳, 黄介生, 伍靖伟, 等. 秋浇条件下季节性冻融土壤盐分运动规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(6): 77-81. |
| PENG Zhenyang, HUANG Jiesheng, WU Jingwei, et al. Salt movement of seasonal freezing-thawing soil under autumn irrigation condition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(6): 77-81. | |
| [23] | 刘绪军, 景国臣, 杨亚娟, 等. 冻融交替作用对表层黑土结构的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(1): 42-46. |
| LIU Xujun, JING Guochen, YANG Yajuan, et al. Effects of alternate freezing and thawing on the structure of black topsoil[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 13(1): 42-46. | |
| [24] | 马效松, 付强, 徐淑琴, 等. 不同冻融时期土壤水分运动参数特征分析及数值模拟[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2020, 28(4): 774-787. |
| MA Xiaosong, FU Qiang, XU Shuqin, et al. Analysis and simulation of soil moisture movement parameters during different freezing-thawing periods[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2020, 28(4): 774-787. |
| [1] | 苗红萍, 王晓伟, 田聪华, 李志, 张玉新, 戴俊生. 塔里木河流域棉花生产与布局演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
| [2] | 王俊铎, 崔豫疆, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产优势区域分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
| [3] | 郑巨云, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 耿世伟, 孙丰磊, 阳妮, 李雪源, 王俊铎. 新疆机采棉花生产关键技术模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
| [4] | 李杰, 刘佳, 王亮, 张娜, 杨延龙, 郑子漂, 魏鑫, 王萌, 周子馨, 阳妮, 龚照龙, 侯献飞, 黄启秀, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 张济鹏, 张鹏忠. “棉、油、糖”科技成果转化现状及应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
| [5] | 扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
| [6] | 李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
| [7] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
| [8] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
| [9] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
| [10] | 王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
| [11] | 张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
| [12] | 董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
| [13] | 赖成霞, 杨延龙, 李春平, 玛依拉·玉素音, 王燕, 杨栋, 阳妮, 葛风伟, 汪鹏龙, 马君. 落叶型棉花黄萎病的生物学特征及药剂防治分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2034-2042. |
| [14] | 刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
| [15] | 高君, 侯献飞, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 汪天玲, 黄奕, 陈晓露, 李强. 棉花-花生轮作模式对花生干物质积累量分配及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1648-1656. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||