

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 839-846.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.04.007
• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:2021-07-13
出版日期:2022-04-20
发布日期:2022-04-24
通信作者:
赵永峰(1967-),男,宁夏隆德人,研究员,研究方向为食用豆育种及栽培,(E-mail) nxgyzhaoyf@126.com作者简介:黄贵斌(1993-),男,宁夏海原人,研究实习员,硕士研究生,研究方向为食用豆育种与栽培,(E-mail) 825668000@qq.com
基金资助:
HUANG Guibin(
), GUAN Yaobing, NIU Yongqi, ZHOU Lilei, ZHAO Yongfeng(
)
Received:2021-07-13
Published:2022-04-20
Online:2022-04-24
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】研究根瘤菌接种对鹰嘴豆生长发育的影响及减施氮肥条件下固氮效果。【方法】以木鹰1号为材料,设C1(根瘤菌A、1/2氮)、C2(根瘤菌B、1/2氮)、C3(根瘤菌A、不施氮)、C4(根瘤菌B、不施氮)和CK1(不接菌、施全氮)、CK2(不接菌,1/2氮)、CK3(不接菌,不施氮)共7个处理,测定各处理鹰嘴豆的根瘤鲜重、叶绿素含量、干重、产量及其构成因素等指标。【结果】接种根瘤菌的处理鲜重显著增长,干物质积累量在生育后期表现为C1 > C2 > CK1 > CK2 > C3 > C4 > CK3。随着生育期的推进,根瘤菌接种显著提高了植株叶绿素含量。C1、C2处理下的鹰嘴豆的单株荚数、单株粒数、单株粒重以及产量升高,C1处理下的产量为1 928.84 kg/hm2,与全氮对照相比增产8.83%;C2处理下的产量为1 827.59 kg/hm2,增产3.11%。【结论】根瘤菌接种下,鹰嘴豆减施氮肥可稳产、增产,且以1/2氮肥加根瘤菌A效果最好。
中图分类号:
黄贵斌, 关耀兵, 牛永岐, 周丽蕾, 赵永峰. 根瘤菌接种对减施氮肥条件下鹰嘴豆干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 839-846.
HUANG Guibin, GUAN Yaobing, NIU Yongqi, ZHOU Lilei, ZHAO Yongfeng. Effect of Rhizobia Inoculation on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Chickpea under Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 839-846.
| 组合代码 Treatmen tcode | 处理 Treatment |
|---|---|
| C1 | 根瘤菌A拌种+1/2氮肥 |
| C2 | 根瘤菌B拌种+1/2氮肥 |
| C3 | 根瘤菌A拌种+不施氮肥 |
| C4 | 根瘤菌B拌种+不施氮肥 |
| CK1 | 不接种根瘤菌,施用全部氮肥 |
| CK2 | 不接种根瘤菌,施用1/2氮肥 |
| CK3 | 不接种根瘤菌,不施用氮肥 |
表1 不同根瘤菌和施氮量处理
Table 1 Experimental treatment of different rhizobia and nitrogen application rates
| 组合代码 Treatmen tcode | 处理 Treatment |
|---|---|
| C1 | 根瘤菌A拌种+1/2氮肥 |
| C2 | 根瘤菌B拌种+1/2氮肥 |
| C3 | 根瘤菌A拌种+不施氮肥 |
| C4 | 根瘤菌B拌种+不施氮肥 |
| CK1 | 不接种根瘤菌,施用全部氮肥 |
| CK2 | 不接种根瘤菌,施用1/2氮肥 |
| CK3 | 不接种根瘤菌,不施用氮肥 |
图1 减施氮肥和根瘤菌接种下鹰嘴豆根瘤鲜重变化 注:不同字母表示处理间差异达到0.05显著水平。下同
Fig.1 Effects of reduced nitrogen fertilizer and rhizobia inoculation on the fresh weight of chickpea nodule Note:Different letters represented significant difference at 0.05 level.The same as below
| 处理 Treat ment | 开花期 Flower stage | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 44.17a | 49.20a | 40.20a | 9.77ab |
| CK2 | 41.28a | 45.90abc | 31.18a | 9.47ab |
| C1 | 42.68a | 46.74ab | 41.14a | 12.37a |
| C2 | 43.66a | 46.62ab | 37.65a | 10.67ab |
| CK3 | 40.47a | 39.83c | 30.88a | 8.67c |
| C3 | 43.66a | 43.03abc | 36.43a | 10.40ab |
| C4 | 43.61a | 43.72abc | 39.02a | 9.36ab |
表2 减施氮肥和根瘤菌接种下鹰嘴豆叶绿素含量变化
Table 2 Effects of reduced nitrogen fertilizer and rhizobia inoculation on chlorophyll content of chickpea
| 处理 Treat ment | 开花期 Flower stage | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 44.17a | 49.20a | 40.20a | 9.77ab |
| CK2 | 41.28a | 45.90abc | 31.18a | 9.47ab |
| C1 | 42.68a | 46.74ab | 41.14a | 12.37a |
| C2 | 43.66a | 46.62ab | 37.65a | 10.67ab |
| CK3 | 40.47a | 39.83c | 30.88a | 8.67c |
| C3 | 43.66a | 43.03abc | 36.43a | 10.40ab |
| C4 | 43.61a | 43.72abc | 39.02a | 9.36ab |
| 部位 Position | 处理 Treatment | 开花期 Flower stage | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 9.84a | 23.10a | 31.90a | 34.56a | |
| CK2 | 9.65a | 18.2b | 29.27a | 31.74ab | |
| C1 | 7.67a | 23.80a | 31.98a | 35.29a | |
| 茎秆 Stalk | C2 | 6.38a | 20.35ab | 30.01a | 31.95ab |
| CK3 | 8.35a | 22.18ab | 28.85a | 25.66b | |
| C3 | 8.45a | 18.20b | 27.11a | 26.16b | |
| C4 | 7.27a | 23.39a | 30.11a | 25.75b |
表3 减施氮肥和根瘤菌接种下鹰嘴豆干物质(茎秆)积累变化
Table 3 Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and rhizobia inoculation on the accumulation of dry matter (stem) of chickpea
| 部位 Position | 处理 Treatment | 开花期 Flower stage | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 9.84a | 23.10a | 31.90a | 34.56a | |
| CK2 | 9.65a | 18.2b | 29.27a | 31.74ab | |
| C1 | 7.67a | 23.80a | 31.98a | 35.29a | |
| 茎秆 Stalk | C2 | 6.38a | 20.35ab | 30.01a | 31.95ab |
| CK3 | 8.35a | 22.18ab | 28.85a | 25.66b | |
| C3 | 8.45a | 18.20b | 27.11a | 26.16b | |
| C4 | 7.27a | 23.39a | 30.11a | 25.75b |
| 部位 Position | 处理 Treatment | 开花期 Flower stage | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 6.65a | 13.32a | 11.38a | 1.3 | |
| CK2 | 6.64a | 11.07a | 9.65a | 1.0 | |
| C1 | 5.46a | 15.37a | 13.15a | 1.61a | |
| 叶片 Leaf blade | C2 | 5.27a | 13.98a | 10.73a | 1.4 |
| CK3 | 5.27a | 11.48a | 9.33a | 0.58c | |
| C3 | 5.66a | 11.81a | 7.46a | 0.9 | |
| C4 | 4.93a | 14.94a | 6.04a | 0.86c |
表4 减施氮肥和根瘤菌接种下鹰嘴豆干物质(叶片)积累变化
Table 4 Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and rhizobia inoculation on the accumulation of dry matter (leaves) of chickpea
| 部位 Position | 处理 Treatment | 开花期 Flower stage | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 6.65a | 13.32a | 11.38a | 1.3 | |
| CK2 | 6.64a | 11.07a | 9.65a | 1.0 | |
| C1 | 5.46a | 15.37a | 13.15a | 1.61a | |
| 叶片 Leaf blade | C2 | 5.27a | 13.98a | 10.73a | 1.4 |
| CK3 | 5.27a | 11.48a | 9.33a | 0.58c | |
| C3 | 5.66a | 11.81a | 7.46a | 0.9 | |
| C4 | 4.93a | 14.94a | 6.04a | 0.86c |
| 部位 Position | 处理 Treatment | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 荚果 Pod | CK1 | 5.01a | 39.58a | 68.90a |
| CK2 | 4.07ab | 38.34a | 61.54b | |
| C1 | 5.34a | 41.33a | 70.69a | |
| C2 | 4.81a | 39.56a | 69.13a | |
| CK3 | 2.38b | 37.33a | 38.96c | |
| C3 | 4.96a | 36.55a | 40.93c | |
| C4 | 4.82a | 35.46a | 40.55c |
表5 减施氮肥和根瘤菌接种下鹰嘴豆干物质(荚果)积累变化
Table 5 Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and rhizobia inoculation on the accumulation of chickpea dry matter (pod) in vitro
| 部位 Position | 处理 Treatment | 结荚期 Pots stage | 鼓粒期 Bulging stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 荚果 Pod | CK1 | 5.01a | 39.58a | 68.90a |
| CK2 | 4.07ab | 38.34a | 61.54b | |
| C1 | 5.34a | 41.33a | 70.69a | |
| C2 | 4.81a | 39.56a | 69.13a | |
| CK3 | 2.38b | 37.33a | 38.96c | |
| C3 | 4.96a | 36.55a | 40.93c | |
| C4 | 4.82a | 35.46a | 40.55c |
| 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 主茎分枝 Node number | 主茎节数 Node numbers of main stem | 单株荚数 Main stem pods | 单株粒数 Seeds per plant | 单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g) | 百粒重 100-grain weight (g) | 产量 Area yield (kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 76.7a | 1.67a | 30.00a | 134.00ab | 134.33bc | 25.44a | 26.39ab | 1 772.39ab |
| CK2 | 64.7b | 1.67a | 29.67a | 111.67b | 111.67bc | 24.30a | 24.18ab | 1 573.64c |
| C1 | 73.2a | 1.89a | 30.75a | 155.60a | 177.00a | 27.36a | 27.26a | 1 928.84a |
| C2 | 74.6a | 1.67a | 30.11a | 132.78ab | 144.57b | 25.10a | 25.58ab | 1 827.59ab |
| CK3 | 75.7a | 1.33a | 28.00a | 105.00b | 107.33c | 22.26a | 22.56b | 1 497.29c |
| C3 | 67.3b | 1.67a | 30.17a | 112.00b | 106.29c | 22.54a | 24.93ab | 1 589.39c |
| C4 | 66.8b | 1.56a | 30.11a | 106.67b | 113.00bc | 23.77a | 23.89ab | 1 524.44c |
表6 减施氮肥和根瘤菌接种下鹰嘴豆产量及相关指标变化
Table 6 Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and rhizobia inoculation on yield and related indexes of chickpea
| 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 主茎分枝 Node number | 主茎节数 Node numbers of main stem | 单株荚数 Main stem pods | 单株粒数 Seeds per plant | 单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g) | 百粒重 100-grain weight (g) | 产量 Area yield (kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 76.7a | 1.67a | 30.00a | 134.00ab | 134.33bc | 25.44a | 26.39ab | 1 772.39ab |
| CK2 | 64.7b | 1.67a | 29.67a | 111.67b | 111.67bc | 24.30a | 24.18ab | 1 573.64c |
| C1 | 73.2a | 1.89a | 30.75a | 155.60a | 177.00a | 27.36a | 27.26a | 1 928.84a |
| C2 | 74.6a | 1.67a | 30.11a | 132.78ab | 144.57b | 25.10a | 25.58ab | 1 827.59ab |
| CK3 | 75.7a | 1.33a | 28.00a | 105.00b | 107.33c | 22.26a | 22.56b | 1 497.29c |
| C3 | 67.3b | 1.67a | 30.17a | 112.00b | 106.29c | 22.54a | 24.93ab | 1 589.39c |
| C4 | 66.8b | 1.56a | 30.11a | 106.67b | 113.00bc | 23.77a | 23.89ab | 1 524.44c |
| [1] |
Costa G, Silva-Queiroz-Monici K D, Reis S, et al. Chemical composition, dietary fibre and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes[J]. Food Chemistry, 2006, 94(3):327-330.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Jukanti A K, Gaur P M, Gowda C, et al. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2012, 108(S1):S11.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 陈利云, 张海林, 周志宇. 生物与非生物因素对共生固氮的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2010, 27(6):64-69. |
| CHEN Liyun, ZHANG Hailin, ZHOU Zhiyu. Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on symbiotic nitrogen fixation[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(6):64-69. | |
| [4] | 徐开未, 张小平, 陈远学, 等. “根瘤菌+Mo”菌剂和AM菌剂对花生生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(2):228-232. |
| XU Kaiwei, ZHANG Xiaoping, CHEN Yuanxue, et al. Effects of coinoculation of bradyrhizobium with molybdate and arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi on growth and yield of peanut plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2009, 31(2):228-232. | |
| [5] |
Herrmann L, Chotte J L, Thuita M, et al. Effects of cropping systems,maize residues application and N fertilization on promiscuous soybean yields and diversity of native rhizobia in Central Kenya[J]. Pedobiologia, 2014, 57:75-85.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Chen Y L, Xiao C X, Wu D L, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on grain yield and grain nitrogen concentration in two maize hybrids with contrasting nitrogen remobilization efficiency[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 62(62):79-89.
DOI URL |
| [7] | 赵永峰, 王斐, 关耀兵, 等. 干旱区鹰嘴豆的氮磷钾肥最优施用量[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(9):143-146. |
| ZHAO Yongfeng, WANG Fei, GUAN Yaobing, et al. Optimum application amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer for chickpeas in arid area[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(9):143-146. | |
| [8] |
朱元刚, 初金鹏, 张秀, 等. 不同播期冬小麦氮素出籽效率与氮素利用及转运的相关性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1151-1160.
PMID |
|
ZHU Yuangang, CHU Jinpeng, ZHANG Xiu, et al. Correlation between nitrogen fruiting efficiency and nitrogen utilization and remobilization in winter wheat at different sowing dates[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(4):1151-1160.
DOI PMID |
|
| [9] | 石德杨, 李艳红, 夏德军, 等. 种植密度对夏玉米根系特性及氮肥吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):2006-2017. |
| SHI Deyang, LI Yanhong, XIA Dejun, et al. Effects of Planting Density on Root Characteristics and Nitrogen Uptake in Summer Maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11):2006-2017. | |
| [10] | 马霞, 王丽丽, 李卫军, 等. 不同施氮水平下接种根瘤菌对苜蓿固氮效能及种子生产的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1):95-102. |
| MA Xia, WANG Lili, LI Weijun, et al. Effects of different inoculation nitrogen levels on nitrogen fixation and seed production of alfalfa inoculated with rhizobia[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1):95-102. | |
| [11] | 董守坤, 刘丽君, 孙聪姝, 等. 利用(15)N标记研究氮素水平对大豆根瘤生长的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(4):985-988. |
| DONG Shoukun, LIU Lijun, SUN Congshu, et al. Effects of nitrogen levels on nodule growth of soybean using 15N tracing method[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2011, 17(4):985-988. | |
| [12] | 吴科生, 宋尚有, 李隆, 等. 氮肥和接种根瘤菌对豌豆/玉米间作产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(11):1274-1280. |
| WU Kesheng, SONG Shangyou, LI Long, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application and rhizobial inoculation on yield and water use efficiency of pea/maize intercropping system[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(11):1274-1280. | |
| [13] | 郑浩宇, 黄炳林, 王孟雪, 等. 氮肥减施与接种根瘤菌对大豆光合与产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2019, 38(3):413-420. |
| ZHENG Haoyu, HUANG Binglin, WANG Mengxue, et al. The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Rhizobium Inoculation on Soybean Photosynjournal and Yield[J]. Soybean Science, 2019, 38(3):413-420. | |
| [14] | Chandra R, Pareek N. Comparative performance of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria with rhizobia on symbiosis and yields in Urdbean and Chickpea[J]. Journal of Food Legumes, 2015, 28(1):86-89. |
| [15] | Nawaz F, Khan N, Shah J A, et al. Yield and yield components of chickpea as affected by various levels of FYM and rhizobium inoculation[J]. Pure and Applied Biology, 2017, 6(1):346. |
| [16] | 索炎炎, 张翔, 司贤宗, 等. 氮肥管理与根瘤菌接种模式对花生生长、氮吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(6):866-871. |
| SUO Yanyan, ZHANG Xiang, SI Xianzong, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management and rhizobium inoculation methods on growth,nitrogen uptake and yield of peanut[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2018, 40(6):866-871. | |
| [17] | 姬月梅, 罗瑞萍, 赵志刚, 等. 不同施氮量及施氮方式对大豆根瘤生长及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(6):887-893. |
| JI Yuemei, LUO Ruiping, ZHAO Zhigang, et al. Effects of different nitrogen application rates and nitrogen application methods on growth and yield of soybean root nodules[J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(6):887-893. | |
| [18] | 张明聪, 何松榆, 侯宇佳, 等. 增加密度减量施氮和接种根瘤菌对红小豆氮素吸收及产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020,(2):133-139,165. |
| ZHANG Mingcong, HE Songyu, HOU Yujia, et al. Effects of increasing planting density with reduced application nitrogen and rhizobium inoculation methods on Nabsorption and yield of adzuki bean plants[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020,(2):133-139,165. | |
| [19] | 李彦连, 王传雷, 徐保民, 等. 徐豆24大豆根瘤菌共生匹配性筛选及应用[J/OL]. 大豆科学, 2020, 15(7):1-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1227.S.20200630.1656.004.html. |
| LI Yanlian, WANG Chuanlei, XU Baomin, et al. Screening and Application of Suitable Symbiotic Combination between Rhizobia and Soybean Cultivar Xudou 24[J/OL]. Soybean Science, 2020, 15(7):1-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1227.S.20200630.1656.004.html. | |
| [20] | Alam F, Bhuiyan M A H, Alam S S, et al. Effect of Rhizobium sp. BARIRGm901 inoculation on nodulation, nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes in gray terrace soil[J]. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2015, 79(10):1660-1668. |
| [21] |
Rafaela G B, Fernanda C C, Marcos R V, et al. Mycorrhizae enhance nitrogen fixation and photosynjournal in phosphorus-starved soybean (Glycine max L.Merrill)[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 140(8):26-33.
DOI URL |
| [22] | 姬月梅, 赵志刚, 罗瑞萍, 等. 不同施氮量条件下大豆品种接种根瘤菌筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(23):80-83. |
| JI Yuemei, ZHAO Zhigang, LUO Ruiping, et al. Screening of rhizobium inoculated with soybean varieties under different nitrogen application rates[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(23):80-83. | |
| [23] | 梁福琴, 关大伟, 党蓓蕾, 等. 根瘤菌和氮素对大豆植株特性及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017,(8):28-31. |
| LIANG Fuqin, GUAN Dawei, Dang Peilei, et al. Effects of rhizobium and nitrogen on characteristics and yield of soybean plants[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017,(8):28-31. | |
| [24] | Kyei-Boahen S, Savala C E N, Chikoye D, et al. Growth and yield responses of cowpea to inoculation and phosphorus fertilization in different environments[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, (8):646. |
| [25] | Elsheikh E A E, Elnesairy N N B, Mahdi A A M, et al. Effect of Sinorhizobium inoculation and chicken manure on nodulation and forage yield of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under irrigation in a semi-arid environment[J]. University of Khartoum Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 14(2):182-197. |
| [26] |
Getachew Z, Abera G, Beyene S. Rhizobium inoculation and sulphur fertilizer improved yield, nutrients uptake and protein quality of soybean (Glysine max L.) varieties on Nitisols of Assosa area, Western Ethiopia[J]. African Journal of Plant Science, 2017, 11(5):123-132.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
Qin L, Zhao J, Tian J, et al. The high-affinity phosphate transporter GmPT5 regulates phosphate transport to nodules and nodulation in soybean[J]. Plant Physiology, 2012, 159(4):1634-1643.
DOI PMID |
| [1] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
| [2] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
| [3] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
| [4] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
| [5] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
| [6] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
| [7] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
| [8] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
| [9] | 袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
| [10] | 袁以琳, 颜安, 左筱筱, 侯正清, 张振飞, 肖淑婷, 孙哲, 马梦倩, 赵宇航. 氮肥减量配施生物有机肥对春小麦增产及土壤培肥的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
| [11] | 牛婷婷, 马明生, 张军高. 秸秆还田和覆膜对旱作雨养农田土壤理化性质及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
| [12] | 赵敏华, 宋秉曦, 张宇鹏, 高志红, 朱勇勇, 陈晓远. 旱作条件下氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮肥偏生产力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
| [13] | 李锁丞, 柳延涛, 董红业, 孙振博, 李紫薇, 张春媛, 王开勇, 李强, 杨明凤. 不同施钾量对滴灌花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1926-1936. |
| [14] | 张彩虹, 王国强, 姜鲁艳, 刘涛, 德贤明. 低能耗组装式深冬生产型日光温室环境因子变化及番茄性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2043-2053. |
| [15] | 杨梅, 赵红梅, 迪丽热巴·夏米西丁, 杨卫君, 张金汕, 惠超. 氮肥减量配施生物质炭对春小麦群体结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||