3种增效剂对双氟·氟氯酯防除春麦田阔叶杂草增效作用评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.016

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 1450-1457.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.016

3种增效剂对双氟·氟氯酯防除春麦田阔叶杂草增效作用评价

王燕¹(), 沈煜洋², 陈利², 马晓燕¹, 陈瑞刚¹, 皇甫蓓炯¹, 孔德鹏³(), 高海峰²()

1.奇台县农业技术推广中心, 新疆奇台 831800
2.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆维吾尔自治区农业技术推广总站, 乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2021-10-05 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-07-07
通信作者: 高海峰(1983-),男,河南人,副研究员,研究方向为粮食作物病虫草害防治,(E-mail) ghf20044666@163.com;
孔德鹏(1986-),男,重庆人,高级农艺师,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail) kongdp2008@qq.com
作者简介:王燕(1975-),女,江苏人,高级农艺师,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail) 1405870563@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0200406);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育专项(xjkcpy-003);国家小麦产业技术体系乌鲁木齐综合试验站(CARS-3-49)

Assessment of Synergism of Florasulam Halauxifen-methyl Added with Three Synergists on Controlling Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field

WANG Yan¹(), SHEN Yuyang², CHEN Li², MA Xiaoyan¹, CHEN Ruigang¹, HUANGFU Beijiong¹, KONG Depeng³(), GAO Haifeng²()

1. Qitai Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Qitai Xinjiang 830091,China
2. Key Laboratory of Intergraded Management of Harmful Crop Vermin of China Northwestern Oasis, MOARA, Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China
3. Agricultural Technology Extension Station of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2021-10-05 Published:2022-06-20 Online:2022-07-07
Supported by:
National Key R & D Program Project(2018YFD0200406);Key S & T Innovation Cultivation Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjkcpy-003);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-3-49)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 评价增效剂对春麦田除草剂增效作用,为安全高效应用除草剂及其减量增效提供依据。【方法】 采用随机区组方法,定点取样调查各小区的杂草株数、鲜质量,评价增效剂对双氟·氟氯酯防除春麦田阔叶杂草的增效作用及安全性。【结果】 20%双氟·氟氯酯WG添加增效剂甲基化植物油、乙烯基三乙氧基硅烷或有机硅对春麦田阔叶杂草的株防效和鲜质量防效分别为95.63%~100.00%和96.91%~100.00%,显著高于20%双氟·氟氯酯WG的株防效和鲜质量防效,但添加增效剂各处理株防效和鲜质量防效之间均无显著性差异。添加增效剂各处理增产率为5.33%~6.29%,增加效益为819.44~964.54 元/hm²,但各处理之间无显著性差异。【结论】 生产上可用20%双氟·氟氯酯WG 15.00 g/hm²+甲基化植物油225.00 g/hm²,或乙烯基三乙氧基硅烷67.50 g/hm²,或有机硅225.00 g/hm²,防除春麦田阔叶杂草。

关键词: 春麦田; 双氟·氟氯酯; 增效剂; 增效作用; 评价

Abstract:

【Objective】 To assess the synergistic effects of synergists on herbicides in spring wheat aiming to provide the basis for the safe and efficient application of herbicides.【Method】 Randomized block design was used to research the number and the fresh weight of weeds at fixed spots, and the synergism and safety of florasulam·halauxifen-methyl in controlling broad-leaved weeds in spring wheat field was evaluated.【Result】 The control effects of 20% florasulam·halauxifen-methyl WG with methylated vegetable oil, vinyltriethoxysilane or organic silicon on broadleaf weeds in spring wheat field were 95.63% - 100.00% and 96.91% - 100.00%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of 20% florasulam·halauxifen-methyl WG.However, there was no significant difference in the control effect of different treatment added synergist.The yield increased by 5.33% - 6.29% and the benefit increased by 819.44- 964.54 yuan/hm², but there was no significant difference among the treatments.【Conclusion】 20% florasulam·halauxifen-methyl WG 15.00 g/hm² + methylated vegetable oil 225.00 g/hm² or vinyltriethoxysilane 67.50 g/hm² or organic silicon 225.00 g/hm² can be used to control broad-leaf weeds in spring wheat field.

Key words: spring wheat field; florasulam·halauxifen-methyl; synergist; synergism; assessment

中图分类号:

王燕, 沈煜洋, 陈利, 马晓燕, 陈瑞刚, 皇甫蓓炯, 孔德鹏, 高海峰. 3种增效剂对双氟·氟氯酯防除春麦田阔叶杂草增效作用评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1450-1457.

WANG Yan, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, MA Xiaoyan, CHEN Ruigang, HUANGFU Beijiong, KONG Depeng, GAO Haifeng. Assessment of Synergism of Florasulam Halauxifen-methyl Added with Three Synergists on Controlling Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1450-1457.

图/表 5

参考文献 21

[1]	高兴祥, 李美, 刘士国, 等. 小麦田不同杂草群落及防除时间对小麦产量的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(4): 908-914.
	GAO Xingxiang, LI Mei, LIU Shiguo, et al. The influence of different weed populations and control time on wheat yield in Shandong[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2018, 45(4): 908-914.
[2]	李广阔, 高海峰, 白微微, 等. 新疆核桃-小麦间作麦田杂草组成及群落特征[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(5): 1137-1144.
	LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng, BAI Weiwei, et al. Species composition and community characteristics of weeds in wheat fields under walnut-wheat intercropping system in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2018, 45(5): 1137-1144.
[3]	李广阔, 高海峰, 白微微, 等. 果麦间作麦田主要杂草种类及群落特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(6): 1112-1118.
	LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng, BAI Weiwei, et al. Species composition and characterization of wheat weed community in fruit tree - wheat intercropping[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(6): 1112-1118.
[4]	高兴祥, 张悦丽, 李美, 等. 山东省小麦田播娘蒿对双氟磺草胺抗性水平及靶标抗性机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2399-2409.
	GAO Xingxiang, ZHANG Yueli, LI Mei, et al. Resistance level and mechanism of Descurainia sophia to florasulam in wheat field of Shandong Province[J]. Scientia Agricultural Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2399-2409.
[5]	毕亚玲, 戴玲玲, 王曹阳, 等. 双环磺草酮与氟氯吡啶酯复配的联合除草剂活性及对水稻的安全性评价[J]. 农药学学报, 2020, 22(1): 68-75.
	BI Yaling, DAI Lingling, WANG Caoyang, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to rice of the combination of benzobicyclon and florpyrauxifen-benzyl[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2020, 22(1): 68-75.
[6]	杨云海, 赵芸, 王凯博, 等. 农药助剂对70%吡虫啉水分散粒剂在小麦叶片上附着性能的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 34(6): 954-964.
	YANG Yunhai, ZHAO Yun, WANG Kaibo, et al. The influence of different adjuvants on the adhesion property of 70% imidacloprid WG on wheat leaves[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Naturw Science), 2019, 34(6): 954-964.
[7]	张健, 高原, 姜英, 等. 助剂激健对甲基二磺隆防除抗精噁噁唑禾草灵菵草的增效作用[J]. 杂草学报, 2019, 37(1): 56-63.
	ZHANG Jian, GAO Yuan, JIANG Ying, et al. Synergistic effect of adjuvant Jijian on mesosulfuron - methyl for the control of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl - resistant Beckmannia syzigachne[J]. Journal of Weeds, 2019, 37(1): 56-63.
[8]	于倩倩, 吴超, 史团省, 等. 不同助剂对除草剂苯磺隆渗透作用的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(7): 155-158.
	YU Qianqian, WU Chao, SHI Tuansheng, et al. Effects of different adjuvants on permeation of herbicide tribenuron - methyl[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(7): 155-158.
[9]	程文超, 李光宁, 相世刚, 等. 安融乐对2种除草剂防除冬小麦田禾本科杂草的增效作用[J]. 杂草学报, 2019, 37(1): 64-70.
	CHENG Wenchao, LI Guangning, XIANG Shigang, et al. Synergistic effect of adjuvant Anngro on grassy weed herbicide efficacy in a winter wheat field[J]. Journal of Weeds, 2019, 37(1): 64-70.
[10]	程文超, 李光宁, 相世刚, 等. 安融乐对除草剂防除冬小麦田阔叶杂草的增效作用[J]. 杂草学报, 2019, 37(2): 57-63.
	CHENG Wenchao, LI Guangning, XIANG Shigang, et al. Adjuvants Anngro synergize broadleaf weed herbicides in winter wheat[J]. Journal of Weeds, 2019, 37(2): 57-63.
[11]	翁华, 魏有海, 郭良芝, 等. 生物助剂与骠马混用防除春小麦田野燕麦的增效作用[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(6): 1308-1310.
	WENG Hua, WEI Youhai, GUO Liangzhi, et al. The synergism of complex microorganism and puma mix of wild oat in spring wheat field[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 53(6): 1308-1310.
[12]	吴仁海, 孙慧慧, 王彦兵, 等. 9种助剂对精噁唑禾草灵、炔草酯除草活性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(12): 84-87.
	WU Renhai, SUN Huihui, WANG Yanbing, et al. Influence of nine adjuvants on weed control effects of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and clodinafop-propargyl[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 44(12): 84-87.
[13]	叶红玉, 徐源盛, 南天竹. 10%苯磺隆加增效剂防除麦田阔叶杂草药效试验[J]. 农药, 2006, 45(2): 127-128.
	YE Hongyu, XU Yuansheng, NAN Tianzhu. Broadleaf weed control field efficacy in wheat with 10% tribenuron plus synergist[J]. Agrochemicals, 2006, 45(2): 127-128.
[14]	王成菊, 张文吉. 助剂在除草剂应用中的作用及发展前景[J]. 农药学学报, 2003, 5(1): 12-20.
	WANG Chengju, ZHANG Wenji. A review and prospect on herbicide adjutants[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2003, 5(1): 12-20.
[15]	郭文超, 张淳, 李新唐, 等. 新疆麦田杂草种类、分布危害及其综合防治技术[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2008, 45(4): 676-681.
	GUO Wenchao, ZHANG Chun, LI Xintang, et al. Types,distribution,damage and integrative control techniques of weeds in wheat field of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 45(4): 676-681.
[16]	赵冰梅, 张芳, 余璐, 等. 70%氟唑磺隆WDG防除春小麦田杂草效果及应用技术研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(6): 1089-1094.
	ZHAO Bingmei, ZHANG Fang, YU Lu, et al. Study of the control effect on weed and applied technique of using 70% flucarbazone WDG in spring wheat field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(6): 1089-1094.
[17]	吴明荣, 唐伟, 陈杰. 我国小麦田除草剂应用及杂草抗药性现状[J]. 农药, 2013, 52(6): 457-460.
	WU Mingrong, TANG Wei, CHEN Jie. Herbicide application and resistance in wheat field of China[J]. Agrochemicals, 2013, 52(6): 457-460.
[18]	张海飞, 付清河, 邵冲, 等. 新型生物基农药增效剂的研发与应用[J]. 合成材料老化与应用, 2016, 45(2): 106-108, 115.
	ZHANG Haifei, FU Qinghe, SHAO Chong, et al. Research and application on the new biological pesticide synergist[J]. Synthetic Materials Aging and Application, 2016, 45(2): 106-108, 115.
[19]	李晓琴, 姚永定, 闫雪, 等. 不同除草剂对冬小麦田阔叶及禾本科杂草的防除效果[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(11): 1899-1902.
	LI Xiaoqin, YAO Yongding, YAN Xue, et al. Study on the control effect of different herbicides on broadleaf and gramineous weeds in winter wheat field[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(11): 1899-1902.
[20]	邓庭和, 张士勤, 王文和, 等. 增效剂激健对小麦除草剂的减量增效作用[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2017, 37(11): 58-60.
	DENG Tinghe, ZHANG Shiqing, WANG Wenhe, et al. The effect of synergist ‘Jijian’ on the reduction and synergism of wheat herbicide[J]. China Plant Protection, 2017, 37(11): 58-60.
[21]	沈常超, 唐文伟, 曾东强, 等. 河南省不同区域麦田主要杂草群落防治药剂筛选[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(10): 86-91.
	SHENG Changchao, TANG Wenwei, ZENG Dongqiang, et al. Screening of herbicides to control main weed communities in different regions of Hennan province[J]. Journal of Hennan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(10): 86-91.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	4	0	0	50

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	35	19
比例	65%	35%

摘要

364

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	364

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	106	258
比例	29%	71%

处理 Treat ment	防治效果 Control effect(%)
处理 Treat ment	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum	卷茎蓼 Polygonum convolvulus	田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis
1	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
2	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
3	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
4	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
5	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
6	100.00±0.00^a	99.34±0.66^a	100.00±0.00^a
7	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
8	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
9	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
10	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
11	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
12	-	-	-

处理 Treat ment	防治效果 Control effect(%)
处理 Treat ment	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum	卷茎蓼 Polygonum convolvulus	田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis
1	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
2	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
3	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
4	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
5	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
6	100.00±0.00^a	99.34±0.66^a	100.00±0.00^a
7	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
8	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
9	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
10	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
11	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
12	-	-	-

处理 Treat ment	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum		卷茎蓼 Polygonum convolvulus		田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis
处理 Treat ment	株防效 Control effect (%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)	株防效 Control effect(%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)	株防效 Control effect(%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)
1	95.77±2.53^a	96.53±2.66^a	96.25±3.74^a	95.62±4.38^a	97.50±2.50^a	99.10±0.90^a
2	95.54±1.60^a	97.66±0.78^a	97.25±1.38^a	96.55±2.68^a	98.75±0.63^a	99.37±0.37^a
3	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	98.42±1.07^a	99.00±0.58^a
4	95.10±3.28^a	97.49±3.56^a	97.02±2.98^a	94.97±5.03^a	95.69±4.31^a	99.63±0.37^a
5	96.53±0.45^a	97.69±2.15^a	98.81±1.19^a	99.46±0.54^a	99.09±0.90^a	99.62±0.37^a
6	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
7	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	98.93±1.07^a	99.35±0.65^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
8	98.85±1.15^a	96.50±6.07^a	96.92±3.08^a	97.26±2.74^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
9	97.96±2.04^a	98.53±2.54^a	99.60±0.40^a	99.44±0.56^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
10	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
11	88.15±4.54^b	91.04±2.61^b	89.22±1.09^b	87.85±0.76^b	94.45±5.55^a	97.24±2.76^a
12	-	-	-	-	-	-

处理 Treat ment	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum		卷茎蓼 Polygonum convolvulus		田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis
处理 Treat ment	株防效 Control effect (%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)	株防效 Control effect(%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)	株防效 Control effect(%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)
1	95.77±2.53^a	96.53±2.66^a	96.25±3.74^a	95.62±4.38^a	97.50±2.50^a	99.10±0.90^a
2	95.54±1.60^a	97.66±0.78^a	97.25±1.38^a	96.55±2.68^a	98.75±0.63^a	99.37±0.37^a
3	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	98.42±1.07^a	99.00±0.58^a
4	95.10±3.28^a	97.49±3.56^a	97.02±2.98^a	94.97±5.03^a	95.69±4.31^a	99.63±0.37^a
5	96.53±0.45^a	97.69±2.15^a	98.81±1.19^a	99.46±0.54^a	99.09±0.90^a	99.62±0.37^a
6	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
7	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	98.93±1.07^a	99.35±0.65^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
8	98.85±1.15^a	96.50±6.07^a	96.92±3.08^a	97.26±2.74^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
9	97.96±2.04^a	98.53±2.54^a	99.60±0.40^a	99.44±0.56^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
10	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
11	88.15±4.54^b	91.04±2.61^b	89.22±1.09^b	87.85±0.76^b	94.45±5.55^a	97.24±2.76^a
12	-	-	-	-	-	-

处理 Treat ment	药后20 d 20 daysafter treatment	药后40 d 40 days after treatment
处理 Treat ment	株防效 Control effect(%)	株防效 Control effect(%)	鲜质量防效 Fresh Weight control effect(%)
1	100.00±0.00^a	97.09±1.37^a	98.23±1.11^a
2	100.00±0.00^a	97.16±0.15^a	98.22±0.34^a
3	100.00±0.00^a	99.44±0.27^a	99.57±0.29^a
4	100.00±0.00^a	95.63±1.92^a	97.30±1.39^a
5	100.00±0.00^a	97.32±0.45^a	97.05±0.67^a
6	99.60±0.40^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
7	100.00±0.00^a	99.49±0.45^a	99.95±0.06^a
8	100.00±0.00^a	98.06±0.91^a	98.00±1.20^a
9	100.00±0.00^a	98.21±1.46^a	96.91±1.11^a
10	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a	100.00±0.00^a
11	100.00±0.00^a	89.22±2.87^b	91.99±1.56^b
12	-	-	-

3种增效剂对双氟·氟氯酯防除春麦田阔叶杂草增效作用评价

Assessment of Synergism of Florasulam Halauxifen-methyl Added with Three Synergists on Controlling Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

处理 Treat ment	药剂 Herbicides	增效剂 Synergist	有效成分用 Dosage(g/hm²)
处理 Treat ment	药剂 Herbicides	增效剂 Synergist	药剂 Herbi cides	增效剂 Syne rgist
1	20%双氟· 氟氯酯水分散粒剂	甲基化植物油	15	225
2			15	450
3			15	675
4		乙烯基三乙氧基硅烷	15	67.5
5			15	112.5
6			15	225
7		有机硅	15	450
8			15	225
9			15	450
10		-	15	675
11			15	-
12	-	-	-

处理 Treat ment	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	增产率 Yield increase rate(%)	增加效益 Increased benefits (yuan/ hm²)
1	6 385.70±74.30^a	5.67±1.17^a	870.70±173.77^a
2	6 383.57±35.77^a	5.66±1.56^a	865.27±225.93^a
3	6 422.50±37.68^a	6.29±1.26^a	964.54±179.79^a
4	6 391.50±48.46^a	5.77±0.97^a	885.49±136.60^a
5	6 365.60±111.33^a	5.33±1.63^a	819.44±250.77^a
6	6 373.90±56.45^a	5.47±0.63^a	840.61±84.83^a
7	6 408.20±49.56^a	6.07±1.92^a	928.07±281.08^a
8	6 377.25±70.05^a	5.52±0.76^a	849.15±108.69^a
9	6 381.60±65.11^a	5.60±0.86^a	860.24±123.81^a
10	6 417.35±36.83^a	6.21±1.49^a	951.40±215.83^a
11	6 367.65±66.75^a	5.36±0.45^a	824.67±57.83^a
12	6 044.25±87.38^b	-	-

[1]	曾婉盈, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤, 李思忠, 钱松廷, 高卫时, 张立明. 甜菜品系叶丛快速生长期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151.
[2]	张帆, 陈晓露, 王洁, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 苗昊翠, 李强. 混合盐碱胁迫对花生种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182.
[3]	刘晶, 杜明川, 张文婷, 鲍海娟, 景美玲, 杜文华. 青海不同地区小黑麦种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190.
[4]	沈煜洋, 洪高洁, 范贵强, 陈利, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 杀虫剂减施和添加助剂对红枣-小麦间作麦田蚜虫防效的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2257-2268.
[5]	陈勇, 周蕾, 隋春, 蔺彩霞. 32份板蓝根栽培种质在新疆产区的性状表现[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314.
[6]	刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
[7]	阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 潘竟海, 陈友强, 刘华君, 董心久, 白晓山, 李思忠, 高卫时, 沙红, 李小惠. 基于产量相关性状综合评价晚播甜菜品种的适应性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1368-1377.
[8]	杨君妍, 闫淼, 吴海波, 杨文莉, 王豪杰, 毛建才, 翟文强, 李俊华. 高温对不同厚皮甜瓜品种种子萌发的影响及其耐热性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396.
[9]	朱韬, 雷庆元, 马亮. 不同水氮用量对复播玉米生长发育、产量及利用效率的影响和选优模型验证[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 835-844.
[10]	钱涛, 吴莉莉, 李磊, 安尼瓦尔·库尔班, 丁瑞丰. 砜吡草唑与二甲戊灵混配对棉田阔叶杂草的防效及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 861-868.
[11]	张家拓, 宋占腾, 玛尔哈巴·帕尔哈提, 李静, 汪晖, 张锐利, 朱靖蓉. 不同品种恰玛古(芜菁)营养品质分析及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 926-936.
[12]	魏杨, 陈国祥, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 买买托合提·吐孙, 田光宇. 5种农药对梨小食心虫的室内毒力测定及田间药效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 665-671.
[13]	包艳丽, 苏武峥, 张利召, 李琼诗. 新疆绿色农业发展水平区域差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 773-780.
[14]	杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 冯国瑞, 达吾来·杰克山, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 刘琪, 艾尔居玛·吐卢汗, 彭云承. 基于主成分分析的玉米杂交组合脱水性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 318-325.
[15]	欧源, 罗莎莎, 王如月, 孙雅丽, 虎海防. 盐胁迫对美国黑核桃幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 393-401.