新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 458-465.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.02.024
收稿日期:
2021-01-25
出版日期:
2022-02-20
发布日期:
2022-03-22
通信作者:
尚志勇(1980- ),新疆伊宁人,教授,博士,研究方向为非线性振动、结构强度与可靠性,(E-mail) zhiyongshang@163.com作者简介:
纪锋(1993- ),辽宁锦州人,讲师,硕士,研究方向为力学课程和再生混凝土制造与结构强度,(E-mail) 2277321735@qq.com
基金资助:
JI Feng1(), LI Zhiyuan2, SHANG Zhiyong1(
), ZHANG Lianwen1
Received:
2021-01-25
Published:
2022-02-20
Online:
2022-03-22
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】 研究运输过程中不同强度振动对哈密瓜机械损伤及贮藏品质的影响,为寻找减轻运输振动逆境对哈密瓜贮藏品质影响的方法提供理论依据。【方法】 模拟哈密瓜在运输过程中的振动条件,哈密瓜的包装设置为半筐包装方式和全筐包装方式。在经过2、4和6 h的振动处理后分析哈密瓜的机械损伤变化。测定与分析其失重率、可溶性固形物、硬度、果实果胶含量以及相关性水解酶。【结果】 在采收后12 d,半筐处理6 h后(T3)的商品率下降到最低,为70.00%,腐烂指数为0.96,其硬度相比对照降低了12.64%;采收第9 d时,半筐振动6 h处理(T3)的失重率较对照增加幅度最大,增加幅度为8.1%。各个处理的哈密瓜的可溶性固形物含量在13.91~16.52%,总体变化趋势较小。此外,半框振动处理时(T3)的单果平均损伤数最高,可达4.65 g个,损伤面积最大为4.34%。振动还诱导了果胶酯酶(PE)和多聚半乳糖醛酸酶(PG)的大量积累,尤其在采收第9 d,半筐振动6 h 处理(T3)的PE和PG相对对照分别增加了224.13%和361.29%,使细胞壁主要成分原果胶、总果胶含量快速降低,各个处理的哈密瓜的原果胶含量变化范围在0.62~2.13 mg/g和0.79~2.59 mg/g。相对于半筐的包装方式,全筐的包装方式会减轻果实在贮运中受到的机械损伤。【结论】 运输振动不但造成哈密瓜的机械损伤,还会导致哈密瓜的快速软化,降低其储藏品质。相比于半筐处理方式,全筐方式进行哈密瓜包装会降低哈密瓜因运输振动造成的机械损伤,提高哈密瓜的商品价值。
中图分类号:
纪锋, 李志元, 尚志勇, 张连文. 运输过程中振动对哈密瓜的机械损伤和贮藏品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 458-465.
JI Feng, LI Zhiyuan, SHANG Zhiyong, ZHANG Lianwen. Effects of Vibration on Mechanical Damage and Storage Quality of Hami Melon during Transportation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 458-465.
处理 Treat ment | 平均机械损伤数 Average number of injuries per fruit (个) | 平均机械损伤面积 Average area of mechanical damage (%) |
---|---|---|
CK | 0±0.00e | 0±0.00e |
T1 | 4.04±0.35b | 3.07±0.38b |
T2 | 4.54±0.42a | 3.16±0.21b |
T3 | 4.65±0.76a | 4.34±0.41a |
T4 | 3.12±0.41d | 2.56±0.33d |
T5 | 3.16±0.57d | 2.94±0.34b |
T6 | 3.63±0.33c | 2.88±0.25c |
表1 不同振动处理下哈密瓜机械损伤变化
Table 1 The effect of vibration on the mechanical damage of Hami melon.
处理 Treat ment | 平均机械损伤数 Average number of injuries per fruit (个) | 平均机械损伤面积 Average area of mechanical damage (%) |
---|---|---|
CK | 0±0.00e | 0±0.00e |
T1 | 4.04±0.35b | 3.07±0.38b |
T2 | 4.54±0.42a | 3.16±0.21b |
T3 | 4.65±0.76a | 4.34±0.41a |
T4 | 3.12±0.41d | 2.56±0.33d |
T5 | 3.16±0.57d | 2.94±0.34b |
T6 | 3.63±0.33c | 2.88±0.25c |
[1] | Remón S. Burlat Cherry Quality after Long Range Transport Optimisation of Packaging Conditions[J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2003, (4):425-434. |
[2] | 杨军, 廖新福, 沙勇龙, 等. 冷链运输对哈密瓜品质及腐烂率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(7):1277-1282. |
YANG Jun, LIAO Xinfu, SHA Yonglong, et al. Effect of Low Temperature Chain Transportation on Qualities and Decay Rate of Hami Melon Fruit[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(7):1277-1282. | |
[3] | 曾媛媛, 王锡昌, 周然, 宋喆文, 谢晶, 周研. 运输振动对哈密瓜贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(3):141-144,148. |
[4] | 申琳, 生吉萍, 罗云波. 运输中的机械损伤对贮藏初期苹果活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1999, 4(5):107-110. |
SHEN Lin, SHENG Jiping, LUO Yunbo. Effects of Mechanical Damage in Transportation on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism of Apples at the Early Stage of Storage[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1999, 4(5):107-110. | |
[5] |
Slaughter D C, Hinsch R T, Thompson J F. Assessment of Vibration Injury to Bartlett pears[J]. Trans of the ASAE, 1993, 36(4):1043-1047.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Gentry J P, Mitchell F G, Sommer N F. Engineering and Quality Aspects of Deciduous Fruits Packed by Volume-Filling and Hand-placing Methods[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1965, 8(4):584-585.
DOI URL |
[7] | 赵芸, 马少博, 胡云峰, 等. 运输过程中振动对蔬菜品质的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(5):75-79. |
ZHAO Yun, MA Shaobo, HU Yunfeng, et al. Effect of Vibration During Transportation on the Quality of Vegetables[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 24(5):75-79. | |
[8] | 王士奎, 李文香, 王丽娇, 等. 不同温度对PE包装平菇保鲜效果的比较[J]. 包装与食品机械, 2012, 30(5):5-8. |
WANG Shikui, LI Wenxiang, WANG Lijiao, et al. Comparison of Fresh-Keeping Effect of PE-packaged PleurtusOstreatus by Different Storage Temperatures[J]. Packaging and Food Machinery, 2012, 30(5):5-8. | |
[9] | 寇兴凯, 王士奎, 李文香, 等. 微真空贮藏方式对平菇保鲜品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2014, 35(16):318-322. |
KOU Xingkai, WANG Shikui, LI Wenxiang, et al. Effect of Micro-Vacuum Storage Method on Fresh-Keeping Quality of Pleurtus Ostreatus[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, 35(16):318-322. | |
[10] | Nagel C W, Patterson M E. Pectin enzymes and development of the pears(Pyrus communis)[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1967, 32:292-329. |
[11] |
Deng Yun, Wu Ying, Li Yunfei. Changes in Firmness, Cell Wall Composition and Cell Wall Hydrolases of Grapes Stored in High Oxygen Atmospheres[J]. Food Research International, 2005, 38(7):769-776.
DOI URL |
[12] | 方建雄, 华雪增, 刘愚. 储藏温度和气体状况对苹果果胶、多聚半乳糖醛酸酶变化的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 1991, 17(1):99-104. |
FANG Jianxiong, HUA Xuezeng, LIU Yu. Effect of Storage Temperature and Atmosphere on the Changes in Pectin and Polygalacturonase in Apple Fruits[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 1991, 17(1):99-104. | |
[13] | 康维民, 肖念新, 蔡金星, 等. 稳定条件下梨的振动损伤研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2004, 35(3):105-108. |
KANG Weimin, XIAO Nianxin, CAI Jinxing, et al. Study on Vibration Damage of Pear under Stable Vibration Condition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2004, 35(3):105-108. | |
[14] | 孙京超, 杜秉健, 赵伟, 等. 振动防护和涂膜保鲜等不同处理措施对苹果采后贮藏特性的影响[J]. 包装与食品机械, 2019, 37(1):1-5. |
SUN Jingchao, DU Bingjian, ZHAO Wei, et al. Influence of Different Methods such as Vibration Protection and Edible Film Preservation on Post-harvest Storage Characteristics of Apples[J]. Packaging and Food Machinery, 2019, 37(1):1-5. | |
[15] | 刘美爽. 贮运过程中振动损伤对蓝莓品质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9):40-50. |
LIU Meishuang. Effect of Vibration Damage on Blueberry Quality during Storage and Transportation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(9):40-50. | |
[16] | 曾媛媛, 周然, 蒋春啟, 等. 不同等级道路运输振动对哈密瓜品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(9):282-289. |
ZENG Yuanyuan, ZHOU Ran, JIANG Chunqi, et al. Effect of Transport Vibration in Different Levels of Road on Hamimelons(Cucumismelo var.saccharinus) Quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(9):282-289. | |
[17] | 周然. 黄花梨运输振动损伤与冷藏品质变化的试验研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007. |
ZHOU Ran. Studies on the Quality Changes of Huanghua Pears during Transport and Storage[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007. | |
[18] |
GUO Qin, WU Bin, PENG Xinyuan, et al. Effects of Chlorine Dioxide Treatment on Respiration Rate and Ethylene Synjournal of Postharvest Tomato Fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2014, 93:9-14.
DOI URL |
[19] | Water R H. The Chemistry and Technology of Pectin [M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991:1-22. |
[20] |
Redgwell R J, Macrae E, Hallett I, et al. In Vivo and in Vitro Swelling of Cell Walls during Fruit Ripening[J]. Planta, 1997, 203(2):162-173.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Yashoda H M, Prabha T N, Tharanathan R N. Mango Ripening-role of Car-bohydrases in Tissue Softening[J]. Food chemistry, 2007, 102(3):691-698.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Yuan L, Bi Y, Ge Y H, et al. Postharvest Hot Water Dipping Reduces Decay by Inducing Disease Resistance and Maintaining Firmness in Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) Fruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 16(2):101-110.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Fagundes C, Palou L, Monteiro A R, et al. Effect of Antifungal Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-beeswax Edible Coatings on Gray Mold Development and Quality Attributes of Cold-stored Cherry tomato Fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2014, 92(2):1-8.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Dong T, Xia R, Wang M, et al. Changes in Dietary Fibre, Polygalacturonase, Cellulase of Navel Orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck ‘Cara Cara’) Fruits under Different Storage Conditions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2008, 116(4):414-420.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Lohani S, Trivedi P K, Nath P. Changes in Activities of Cell Wall Hydrolases during Ethylene-induced Ripening in Banana:Effect of 1-MCP, ABA and IAA[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2004, 31(2):119-126.
DOI URL |
[26] | Chonhenchob V, Singh S P. Packaging Performance Comparison for Distribution and Export of Papaya Fruit[J]. Packaging Ttechnology and Science, 2005, 18(3):125-131. |
[1] | 李自芹, 李文绮, 陶登峰, 贾文婷, 金新文, 雷用东, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1947-1954. |
[2] | 许进宗, 包建平. 不同滴灌灌水量对库尔勒香梨果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1696-1709. |
[3] | 李慧, 毕莹, 王新宇, 雷雅馨, 张琪, 黄帅, 热扎·库忘德克, 王静. 核桃青皮多酚调控对哈密瓜采后活性氧代谢水平及腐烂率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2966-2975. |
[4] | 李自芹, 陈雅, 李文绮, 贾文婷, 郭慧静, 宋方圆, 赵志永, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H2O2处理对绿糖心冬枣贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215. |
[5] | 田敬宇, 高雁, 高兴旺, 曾军, 赵鹏安, 苏比努尔·居来提. 哈密瓜种植对根际土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262. |
[6] | 谭新赞, 沈从举, 代亚猛, 李帆, 贾首星, 蒙贺伟. 1SZL-300型振动深松整地联合作业机的研制[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2566-2573. |
[7] | 闫淼, 熊韬, 黄全生, 吴婷, 吴海波, 赵准, 胡国智. 外源水杨酸对单盐胁迫下哈密瓜叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2123-2129. |
[8] | 徐斌, 张婷, 潘俨, 王梓名, 张连文, 谢晓定. 物流运输振动对采后哈密瓜贮藏期软化和细胞壁降解酶的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2130-2135. |
[9] | 徐斌, 阿塔吾拉·铁木尔, 张婷, 潘俨, 张连文, 谢晓定. 不同贮藏温度对西州密25号哈密瓜果实软化的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1135-1143. |
[10] | 郭慧静, 宋方圆, 李冀新, 赵志永. 蟠桃专用包装盒在模拟运输中减振功能分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1284-1291. |
[11] | 郑素慧, 何庆, 张健, 关军锋, 秦南南, 杨怡靖铭, 刘雪艳, 吴斌. 茉莉酸甲酯对红地球葡萄采后贮藏品质和病害的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 190-198. |
[12] | 刘会芳, 韩宏伟, 王强, 庄红梅, 王浩. 哈密瓜叶色黄绿突变体Cmygl-1快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 276-281. |
[13] | 李中祥, 温浩军, 王国良, 周倩倩. 高地隙自走式喷雾机底盘悬架减振特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2250-2255. |
[14] | 闫淼, 胡国智, 熊韬, 冯炯鑫. 新疆不同品种哈密瓜品质特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1802-1808. |
[15] | 房世杰, 徐斌, 潘俨, 张婷. 两种哈密瓜不同贮藏温度果实质地变化关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(9): 1626-1634. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 94
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 194
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||