新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 1961-1970.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.11.001
高新(), 樊哲儒, 王重, 李剑峰, 张宏芝, 张跃强(
)
收稿日期:
2020-11-27
出版日期:
2021-11-20
发布日期:
2021-12-16
通信作者:
张跃强(1976-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,研究方向为小麦遗传育种,(E-mail) zhangyqyhm@163.com作者简介:
高新(1988- ),女,新疆人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为小麦遗传育种,(E-mail) gaoxin0564@163.com
基金资助:
GAO Xin(), FAN Zheru, WANG Zhong, LI Jianfeng, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang(
)
Received:
2020-11-27
Published:
2021-11-20
Online:
2021-12-16
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究不同灌溉条件下一个春小麦重组自交系(RIL)冠层温度与产量性状的相关性,为抗旱高产春小麦品种选育和栽培提供参考。【方法】于2014~2016年,对春小麦重组自交系(RIL)群体的188个株系,在充分灌溉和有限灌溉条件下, 分析RIL群体的抽穗期、灌浆初期和灌浆中期的冠层温度与产量的关系。【结果】有限灌溉条件下,春小麦各个生育时期的冠层温度均极显著高于充分灌溉(P<0.01)。在同一灌溉条件下,不同生育期之间的冠层温度也存在极显著差异(P<0.01),且随着生育期的推进,冠层温度呈升高趋势。产量及大部分产量构成因素与各生育时期的冠层温度之间均呈负相关性。冠层温度和产量及其构成因素之间的负相关性由强到弱依次为产量、千粒重、穗粒数、单株粒重。在有限灌溉条件下,产量与各个时期的冠层温度具有明显的线性递减关系,且与灌浆中期的冠层温度具有最明显的线性关系,而在充分灌溉条件下,这种线性递减关系不明显。【结论】有限灌溉条件下,春小麦产量及产量构成因子与冠层温度具有明显负相关性,冠层温度可作为一个重要指标用于指导春小麦育种、栽培等生产实践。
中图分类号:
高新, 樊哲儒, 王重, 李剑峰, 张宏芝, 张跃强. 不同灌溉条件下一个春小麦重组自交系(RIL)冠层温度与产量性状的相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 1961-1970.
GAO Xin, FAN Zheru, WANG Zhong, LI Jianfeng, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang. Correlation Analysis of Canopy Temperature and Yield Characteristics of One Xinjiang Spring Wheat RIL under Different Irrigation Conditions[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 1961-1970.
冠层温度Canopy temperature | 产量性状Yield characteristics | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆初期 Early filling stage | 灌浆中期 Middle filling stage | 平均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV | 产量 Yield (t/hm2) | 千粒重 TKW (g) | 单株有 效穗数 Spike number per plant | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | |
2014充分灌溉 Sufficient irrigation in 2014 | 22.24 | 23.65 | 24.6 | 23.5 | 4.24 | 7.83a | 42.76e | 1.05i | 39.67l |
2014有限灌溉 Deficit irrigation in 2014 | 25.44 | 27.77 | 27.78 | 27 | 6.25 | 6.9b | 42.14e | 1.04i | 34.18m |
2015充分灌溉 Sufficient irrigation in 2015 | 19.11 | 23.94 | 27.99 | 23.68 | 5.21 | 7.93a | 44.45d | 1.17h | 44.1k |
2015有限灌溉 Deficit irrigation in 2015 | 21.64d | 27.94 | 29.22 | 26.27 | 5.57 | 6.25c | 36.73f | 1.05i | 39.85l |
2016充分灌溉 Sufficient irrigation in 2016 | 19.01 | 22.62 | 23.07 | 21.57 | 4.43 | 7ab | 33.9g | 1.03ij | 41.06l |
2016有限灌溉 Deficit irrigation in 2016 | 23.19 | 27.16 | 28.37 | 26.24 | 5.39 | 6.26c | 33.07g | 1.02j | 37.74m |
表1 不同灌溉条件和生育时期下RIL的冠层温度和产量性状变化
Table 1 Canopy temperature and yield characteristics of RIL in different growing stages and irrigations
冠层温度Canopy temperature | 产量性状Yield characteristics | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆初期 Early filling stage | 灌浆中期 Middle filling stage | 平均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV | 产量 Yield (t/hm2) | 千粒重 TKW (g) | 单株有 效穗数 Spike number per plant | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | |
2014充分灌溉 Sufficient irrigation in 2014 | 22.24 | 23.65 | 24.6 | 23.5 | 4.24 | 7.83a | 42.76e | 1.05i | 39.67l |
2014有限灌溉 Deficit irrigation in 2014 | 25.44 | 27.77 | 27.78 | 27 | 6.25 | 6.9b | 42.14e | 1.04i | 34.18m |
2015充分灌溉 Sufficient irrigation in 2015 | 19.11 | 23.94 | 27.99 | 23.68 | 5.21 | 7.93a | 44.45d | 1.17h | 44.1k |
2015有限灌溉 Deficit irrigation in 2015 | 21.64d | 27.94 | 29.22 | 26.27 | 5.57 | 6.25c | 36.73f | 1.05i | 39.85l |
2016充分灌溉 Sufficient irrigation in 2016 | 19.01 | 22.62 | 23.07 | 21.57 | 4.43 | 7ab | 33.9g | 1.03ij | 41.06l |
2016有限灌溉 Deficit irrigation in 2016 | 23.19 | 27.16 | 28.37 | 26.24 | 5.39 | 6.26c | 33.07g | 1.02j | 37.74m |
变异来源 Source of variance | 年份 Year | 平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F-Value | P值 P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灌溉条件 Irrigation | 2014 | 1 510.84 | 1 | 1 510.84 | 1 391.11 | <0.001 |
2015 | 1 258.74 | 1 | 1 258.74 | 1 146.51 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 4 119.77 | 1 | 4 119.77 | 5 559.92 | <0.001 | |
生育期 Growth stage | 2014 | 1 366.94 | 2 | 683.47 | 113.33 | <0.001 |
2015 | 26 517.52 | 2 | 13 258.76 | 3 424.81 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 9 143.99 | 2 | 4 571.99 | 643.80 | <0.001 | |
抽穗期 Heading | 2014 | 1 932.17 | 1 | 1 932.17 | 460.98 | <0.001 |
2015 | 1 200.13 | 1 | 1 200.13 | 473.67 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 3 288.50 | 1 | 3 288.50 | 2 453.94 | <0.001 | |
灌浆初期 Early filling stage | 2014 | 3 204.72 | 1 | 3 204.72 | 2 251.62 | <0.001 |
2015 | 3 010.24 | 1 | 3 010.24 | 1 811.16 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 5 312.34 | 1 | 5 312.34 | 2 140.91 | <0.001 | |
灌浆中期 Middle filling stage | 2014 | 257.34 | 1 | 257.34 | 226.48 | <0.001 |
2015 | 286.54 | 1 | 286.54 | 199.27 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 3 884.41 | 1 | 3 884.41 | 4 492.27 | <0.001 |
表2 不同灌溉条件和生育时期对小麦冠层温度方差
Table 2 Analysis of variance of the influence of growing stage and irrigation to canopy temperature of RIL
变异来源 Source of variance | 年份 Year | 平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F-Value | P值 P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灌溉条件 Irrigation | 2014 | 1 510.84 | 1 | 1 510.84 | 1 391.11 | <0.001 |
2015 | 1 258.74 | 1 | 1 258.74 | 1 146.51 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 4 119.77 | 1 | 4 119.77 | 5 559.92 | <0.001 | |
生育期 Growth stage | 2014 | 1 366.94 | 2 | 683.47 | 113.33 | <0.001 |
2015 | 26 517.52 | 2 | 13 258.76 | 3 424.81 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 9 143.99 | 2 | 4 571.99 | 643.80 | <0.001 | |
抽穗期 Heading | 2014 | 1 932.17 | 1 | 1 932.17 | 460.98 | <0.001 |
2015 | 1 200.13 | 1 | 1 200.13 | 473.67 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 3 288.50 | 1 | 3 288.50 | 2 453.94 | <0.001 | |
灌浆初期 Early filling stage | 2014 | 3 204.72 | 1 | 3 204.72 | 2 251.62 | <0.001 |
2015 | 3 010.24 | 1 | 3 010.24 | 1 811.16 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 5 312.34 | 1 | 5 312.34 | 2 140.91 | <0.001 | |
灌浆中期 Middle filling stage | 2014 | 257.34 | 1 | 257.34 | 226.48 | <0.001 |
2015 | 286.54 | 1 | 286.54 | 199.27 | <0.001 | |
2016 | 3 884.41 | 1 | 3 884.41 | 4 492.27 | <0.001 |
生育时期 Growth stage | 年份 Year | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆初期 Prime grain filling | 灌浆中期 Medium grain filling | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
充分灌溉 Full irrigation | 有限灌溉 Limited irrigation | 充分灌溉 Full irrigation | 有限灌溉 Limited irrigation | 充分灌溉 Full irrigation | 有限灌溉 Limited irrigation | ||
抽穗期 Heading | 2014 | 1 | 1 | ||||
2015 | 1 | 1 | |||||
2016 | 1 | 1 | |||||
灌浆初期 Early filling stage | 2014 | 0.473** | 0.022 | 1 | 1 | ||
2015 | 0.537** | 0.291** | 1 | 1 | |||
2016 | 0.215** | 0.282** | 1 | 1 | |||
灌浆中期 Middle filling stage | 2014 | 0.551** | 0.518** | 0.431** | 0.439** | 1 | 1 |
2015 | 0.506** | 0.003 | 0.686** | 0.533** | 1 | 1 | |
2016 | 0.067 | 0.199** | 0.294** | 0.268** | 1 | 1 |
表3 不同生育时期冠层温度的相关系数
Table 3 Correlation coefficient of canopy temperature in different growing stages
生育时期 Growth stage | 年份 Year | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆初期 Prime grain filling | 灌浆中期 Medium grain filling | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
充分灌溉 Full irrigation | 有限灌溉 Limited irrigation | 充分灌溉 Full irrigation | 有限灌溉 Limited irrigation | 充分灌溉 Full irrigation | 有限灌溉 Limited irrigation | ||
抽穗期 Heading | 2014 | 1 | 1 | ||||
2015 | 1 | 1 | |||||
2016 | 1 | 1 | |||||
灌浆初期 Early filling stage | 2014 | 0.473** | 0.022 | 1 | 1 | ||
2015 | 0.537** | 0.291** | 1 | 1 | |||
2016 | 0.215** | 0.282** | 1 | 1 | |||
灌浆中期 Middle filling stage | 2014 | 0.551** | 0.518** | 0.431** | 0.439** | 1 | 1 |
2015 | 0.506** | 0.003 | 0.686** | 0.533** | 1 | 1 | |
2016 | 0.067 | 0.199** | 0.294** | 0.268** | 1 | 1 |
性状 Trait | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆初期 Prime grain filling | 灌浆中期 Medium grain filling | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014年 | 2015年 | 2016年 | 2014年 | 2015年 | 2016年 | 2014年 | 2015年 | 2016年 | ||
产量 Yield(t/hm2) | 充分灌溉 | -0.064 | -0.225** | -0.022 | -0.029 | -0.048 | -0.091 | -0.151** | -0.088 | -0.092 |
有限灌溉 | -0.355** | -0.016 | -0.148** | -0.330** | -0.700** | -0.181** | -0.545** | -0.409** | -0.390** | |
千粒重 TKW(g) | 充分灌溉 | -0.107* | -0.154** | -0.034 | -0.023 | -0.122* | -0.089 | -0.097 | -0.103* | -0.037 |
有限灌溉 | -0.08 | -0.059 | -0.079 | -0.214** | -0.571** | -0.028 | -0.290** | -0.327** | -0.186** | |
单株有效穗数 Spike number per plant | 充分灌溉 | -0.112* | -0.064 | -0.101 | 0.068 | 0.033 | -0.136** | -0.260** | -0.071 | -0.099 |
有限灌溉 | 0.025 | 0.007 | -0.023 | -0.031 | -0.057 | 0.009 | -0.01 | 0.004 | -0.121* | |
小穗数 Spikelet number per spike | 充分灌溉 | -0.128* | -0.103* | -0.038 | 0.039 | -0.025 | -0.003 | 0.028 | -0.03 | 0.073 |
有限灌溉 | -0.170** | 0.063 | -0.171** | -0.166** | 0.073 | -0.007 | 0.156** | 0.038 | -0.054 | |
穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 充分灌溉 | -0.125* | -0.052 | -0.039 | -0.134** | -0.007 | -0.151** | -0.08 | -0.04 | -0.029 |
有限灌溉 | -0.201** | -0.025 | -0.064 | -0.248** | -0.187** | -0.165** | -0.146** | -0.057 | -0.196** | |
穗粒重 Grain weight per spike | 充分灌溉 | -0.099 | -0.027 | -0.054 | -0.119* | 0.006 | -0.131* | -0.129* | -0.03 | -0.05 |
有限灌溉 | -0.185** | -0.009 | -0.101 | -0.246** | -0.442** | -0.089 | -0.195** | -0.185** | -0.220** | |
单株粒重 Grain weight per plant | 充分灌溉 | -0.057 | -0.035 | -0.065 | -0.092 | -0.006 | -0.140** | -0.049 | -0.075 | -0.064 |
有限灌溉 | -0.144** | -0.026 | -0.099 | -0.231** | -0.375** | -0.083 | -0.179** | -0.160** | -0.184** |
表4 冠层温度与产量及其产量构成因素之间的相关系数
Table 4 Correlation coefficient of canopy temperature to yield and yield component
性状 Trait | 抽穗期 Heading | 灌浆初期 Prime grain filling | 灌浆中期 Medium grain filling | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014年 | 2015年 | 2016年 | 2014年 | 2015年 | 2016年 | 2014年 | 2015年 | 2016年 | ||
产量 Yield(t/hm2) | 充分灌溉 | -0.064 | -0.225** | -0.022 | -0.029 | -0.048 | -0.091 | -0.151** | -0.088 | -0.092 |
有限灌溉 | -0.355** | -0.016 | -0.148** | -0.330** | -0.700** | -0.181** | -0.545** | -0.409** | -0.390** | |
千粒重 TKW(g) | 充分灌溉 | -0.107* | -0.154** | -0.034 | -0.023 | -0.122* | -0.089 | -0.097 | -0.103* | -0.037 |
有限灌溉 | -0.08 | -0.059 | -0.079 | -0.214** | -0.571** | -0.028 | -0.290** | -0.327** | -0.186** | |
单株有效穗数 Spike number per plant | 充分灌溉 | -0.112* | -0.064 | -0.101 | 0.068 | 0.033 | -0.136** | -0.260** | -0.071 | -0.099 |
有限灌溉 | 0.025 | 0.007 | -0.023 | -0.031 | -0.057 | 0.009 | -0.01 | 0.004 | -0.121* | |
小穗数 Spikelet number per spike | 充分灌溉 | -0.128* | -0.103* | -0.038 | 0.039 | -0.025 | -0.003 | 0.028 | -0.03 | 0.073 |
有限灌溉 | -0.170** | 0.063 | -0.171** | -0.166** | 0.073 | -0.007 | 0.156** | 0.038 | -0.054 | |
穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 充分灌溉 | -0.125* | -0.052 | -0.039 | -0.134** | -0.007 | -0.151** | -0.08 | -0.04 | -0.029 |
有限灌溉 | -0.201** | -0.025 | -0.064 | -0.248** | -0.187** | -0.165** | -0.146** | -0.057 | -0.196** | |
穗粒重 Grain weight per spike | 充分灌溉 | -0.099 | -0.027 | -0.054 | -0.119* | 0.006 | -0.131* | -0.129* | -0.03 | -0.05 |
有限灌溉 | -0.185** | -0.009 | -0.101 | -0.246** | -0.442** | -0.089 | -0.195** | -0.185** | -0.220** | |
单株粒重 Grain weight per plant | 充分灌溉 | -0.057 | -0.035 | -0.065 | -0.092 | -0.006 | -0.140** | -0.049 | -0.075 | -0.064 |
有限灌溉 | -0.144** | -0.026 | -0.099 | -0.231** | -0.375** | -0.083 | -0.179** | -0.160** | -0.184** |
[1] | 刘瑞文, 董振国. 冠层温度和气温的差与冬小麦生长的关系[J]. 生态学报, 1993, 13(4):377-379. |
LIU Ruiwen, DONG Zhengguo. The Relationship between Difference of Canopy and Air Temperatures and Growth in Winter Wheat[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1993, 13(4):377-379. | |
[2] | Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M. Association of canopy temperature depression with yield of durum wheat genotypes under supplementary irrigated and rainfed conditions.[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2011, 5(2):138-146. |
[3] | 张嵩午, 王长发, 周春菊, 等. 冠层温度中间型小麦及其性状特征[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2000, 20(3):40-45. |
ZHANG Songwu, WANG Changfa, ZHOU Chunju, et al. Middle Typal Wheat and Its Specif ic Character[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2000, 20(3):40-45. | |
[4] | Followell C A, Rod K S, Knott C A . Canopy temperature and grain yield of irrigated wheat in Kentucky[J]. 2019. |
[5] |
闫川, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 等. 穗肥施量对水稻植株形态、群体生态及穗叶温度的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12):2176-2183.
DOI |
YAN Cuan, DING Yanfeng, WANG Qiangsheng, et al. Effect of Panicle Fertilizer Application Rate on Morphological, Ecological, Characteristics, and Organ Temperature of Rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinca, 2008, 34(12):2176-2183. | |
[6] | 周春菊, 张嵩午, 王林权, 等. 不同施肥条件下冷、暖型小麦冠层温度的差异[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(10):45-54. |
ZHOU Chunju, ZHANG Songwu, WANG Linquan, et al. Differences of canopy temperature between cold type wheat and warm type wheat under different fertilization conditions[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2006, 34(10):45-54. | |
[7] |
Tanner C B. Plant Temperatures[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1963, 55(2):210-211.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Costa J M, Grant OM, Chaves MM. Thermography to explore plant-environment interactions[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(13):3937-3949.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Gonzalez-Dugo V, Lopez-Lopez M, Espada for M, et al. Transpiration from canopy temperature: Implications for the assessment of crop yield in almond orchards[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2019, 105:78-85.
DOI |
[10] | Zheng E, Zhang C, Qi Z, et al. Canopy Temperature Response to the Paddy Water Content and Its Relationship with Fluorescence Parameters and Dry Biomass[J]. Agricultural Research, 2020:1-10. |
[11] |
Reynolds M, Manes Y, Izanloo A, et al. Phenotyping approaches for physiological breeding and gene discovery in wheat[J]. Annals of Applied Biology, 2010, 155(3):309-320.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Lopes M S, Reynolds M P, Jalal-Kamali M R, et al. The yield correlations of selectable physiological traits in a population of advanced spring wheat lines grown in warm and drought environments[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 128(2):129-136.
DOI URL |
[13] | 胡单, 王长发. 大麦冠层温度及其与光合性能的关联[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(2):62-67. |
HU Dan, WANG Changfa. Relationships between Canopy Temperature and Physiological Characters of Barley[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2011, 20(2):62-67. | |
[14] | 高继平, 韩亚东, 王晓通, 等. 水稻齐穗期冠层温度分异及其相关特性的研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2011, 42(4):399-405. |
GAO Jipin, HAN Yadong, WANG Xiaotong, et al. Canopy Temperature Difference and the Related Characteristics at Heading Stage in Rice[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2011, 42(4):399-405. | |
[15] | 李永平, 王长发, 赵丽, 等. 不同基因型大豆冠层冷温现象的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(11):80-83. |
LI Yongpin, WANG Changfa, ZHAO Li, et al. Low temperature phenomena of soybean of different genotype[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2007, 35(11):80-83. | |
[16] | 任学敏, 朱雅, 王小立, 等. 花生产量性状与冠层温度的关系[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(12):39-45. |
REN Xuemin, ZHU Ya, WANG Xiaoli, et al. Relationships between Yield Characteristics and Canopy temperature of Peanut[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2014, 42(12):39-45. | |
[17] | 韩磊, 王长发, 王建, 等. 棉花冠层温度分异现象及其生理特性的研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2007, 16(3):85-88. |
HAN Lei, WANG Changfa, WANG Jian, et al. The Study on Differences of the Canopy Temperature and Physiological Characteristics of Cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2007, 16(3):85-88. | |
[18] | 苗芳, 张嵩午, 张宾, 等. 绿豆的冠层温度分异现象及其叶片结构特征[J]. 西北农业学报, 2005, 14(4):5-9. |
MIAO Fang, ZHANG Songwu, ZHANG Bi, et al. Canopy Temperature Difference of Mung Bean and Its Leaf Structure Characteristics[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2005, 14(4):5-9. | |
[19] | 王一, 王长发, 邹燕, 等. 豌豆冠层温度分异现象及其生理特性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(4):133-136. |
WANG Yi, WANG Changfa, ZOU Yan, et al. Study on Canopy Temperature and Physiological Characteristics of Different Peas[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2009, 18(4):133-136. | |
[20] | 申国安, 王竹林, 李万昌, 等. 小麦冠层温度的遗传和配合力分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 28(6):43-47. |
SHEN Guoan, WANG Zulin, LI Wanchang, et al. Analysis of the inheritance and combining ability of the canopy temperature in wheat[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2000, 28(6):43-47. | |
[21] | Amani I, Fischer R A, Reynolds M P. Canopy Temperature Depression Association with Yield of Irrigated Spring Wheat Cultivars in a Hot Climate[J]. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science, 2010, 176(2):119-129. |
[22] |
Reynolds M P, Singh R P, Ibrahim A, et al. Evaluating physiological traits to complement empirical selection for wheat in warm environments[J]. Euphytica, 1998, 100(1-3):85-94.
DOI URL |
[23] | 朱云集, 李向阳, 郭天财, 等. 小麦灌浆期间冠层温度与产量关系研究[J]. 河南科学, 2004, 22(6):798-801. |
ZHU Yuji, LI Xiangyang, GUO Tiancai, et al. Study on connection between Wheat Canopy Temperature and Yield in filling stage[J]. Henan Science, 2004, 22(6):798-801. | |
[24] | 徐银萍, 宋尚有, 樊廷录, 等. 旱地冬小麦灌浆期冠层温度与产量和水分利用效率的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2007(3):528-532. |
XU Yinpin, SONG Shangyou, FAN Tinglu, et al. Relationship of Canopy Temperature with Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Various Genotypes of Dryland Winter Wheat during Grain Filling Stage[J]. Journal o f Triticeae Crops, 2007(3):528-532. | |
[25] |
Mario G, Matthewp R, Williamr R, et al. Spectral Water Indices for Assessing Yield in Elite Bread Wheat Genotypes under Well-Irrigated, Water-Stressed, and High-Temperature Conditions[J]. Crop Science, 2010, 50(1):197-214.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Reynolds M P, Balota M, Delgado M, et al. Physiological and Morphological Traits Associated With Spring Wheat Yield Under Hot, Irrigated Conditions[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 1994, 21(6):717-730.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Francesco G, Rosella M, Giovanni P. Has long-term selection for yield in durum wheat also induced changes in leaf and canopy traits[J]. Field Crops Research, 2008, 106(1):68-76.
DOI URL |
[28] | Gutierrez M, Reynolds M P, Raun W R, et al. Indirect selection for grain yield in spring bread wheat in diverse nurseries worldwide using parameters locally determined in north-west Mexico[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2012, 150(1):23-43. |
[29] |
Royo C, Villegas D, Moral L F G D, et al. Comparative performance of carbon isotope discrimination and canopy temperature depression as predictors of genotype differences in durum wheat yield in Spain[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002, 53(5):561-569.
DOI URL |
[30] | 邓强辉, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 作物冠层温度的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(6):1162-1165. |
DEND Qianghui, PAN Xiaohua, SHI Qinhua. Research advances on crop canopy temperature[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(6):1162-1165. | |
[31] | 郎坤, 刘泉汝, 卞城月, 等. 推迟拔节水灌溉对宽幅精播麦田冠层温度与叶片水分利用效率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(15):5262-5268. |
LANG Kun, LIU Quanru, BIAN Chenyue, et al. Effect of delayed irrigation at jointing stage on canopy temperature and leaf water use efficiency of winter wheat in wide-precision planting pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(15):5262-5268. | |
[32] | 赵刚, 樊廷录, 李尚中, 等. 不同品种冬小麦冠层温度与抗旱性和水分利用效率的关系研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2010, 31(3):334-337. |
ZHAO Gang, FAN Tinglu, LI Shangzhong, et al. Study of Relationship of Canopy Temperature with Drought Resistance and Water Use Efficiency on Different Genotype Winter Wheat[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2010, 31(3):334-337. | |
[33] |
DeJonge K C, Taghvaeian S, Trout T J, et al. Comparison of canopy temperature-based water stress indices for maize[J]. Agricultural water management, 2015, 156:51-62.
DOI URL |
[34] | Zhang Y, Wang Z, Fan Z, et al. Phenotyping and evaluation of CIMMYT WPHYSGP nursery lines and local wheat varieties under two irrigation regimes[J]. Breeding Science, 2019. |
[35] | 樊廷录, 宋尚有, 徐银萍, 等. 旱地冬小麦灌浆期冠层温度与产量和水分利用效率的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(11):4491-4497. |
FAN Tinglu, SONG Shangyou, XU Yingpin, et al. Relationship between canopy temperature and water use efficiency grain yield among dryland winter wheat genotypes during grain filling stage[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(11):4491-4497. | |
[36] |
Winter S R. Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought-resistant winter wheat[J]. Crop Science, 1988, 28(3):512-516.
DOI URL |
[37] | 李树华, 白海波, 吕学莲, 等. 春小麦碳同位素分辨率与冠层温度的相关性研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(2):313-319. |
LI Shuhua, BAI Haibo, LÜ Xuelian, et al. Study on Correlation between Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Canopy Temperature Discrimination and Canopy Temperature of Wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2013, 33(2):313-319. | |
[38] | 牟会荣. 旱地春小麦籽粒碳同位素分辨率及冠层温度与产量的关系[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 26(26):10567-10569. |
MU Huirong. Relationships among Grain Carbon Isotope Discrimination, Canopy Temperature and Yield in Spring Wheat under Drought Conditions[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 26(26):10567-10569. | |
[39] |
Reynolds M P, Balota M, Delgado M, et al. Physiological and Morphological Traits Associated With Spring Wheat Yield Under Hot, Irrigated Conditions[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 1994, 21(6):717-730.
DOI URL |
[40] | 刘建军, 肖永贵, 祝芳彬, 等. 不同基因型冬小麦冠层温度与产量性状的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29(2):283-288. |
LIU Jianjun, XIAO Yonggui, ZHU Fangbin, et al. Effect of Canopy Temperature on Yield Traits of Different Genotypes of Winter Wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2009, 29(2):283-288. | |
[41] | 李向阳, 朱云集, 郭天财. 不同小麦基因型灌浆期冠层和叶面温度与产量和品质关系的初步分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(2):88-91. |
LI Xiangyang, ZHU Yunji, GUO Tiancai. Preliminary Analysis on the Relationship between Wheat Canopy Temperature and Yield with Quality in Filling Stage in Different Genotypes[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2004, 24(2):88-91. | |
[42] | Hou M, Tian F, Zhang T, et al. Evaluation of canopy temperature depression, transpiration, and canopy greenness in relation to yield of soybean at reproductive stage based on remote sensing imagery[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 222. |
[43] | 张冬玲, 张洪娜, 郝晨阳, 等. 花后冠层温度对小麦产量的影响及几个关联SSR位点的效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(4):548-556. |
ZHANG Donglin, ZHANG Hongna, HAO Chenyang, et al. Influence of Canopy Temperature (CT) During Grain-Filling Period on Yield and Effects of Several CT-Associated SSR Loci[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinca, 2015, 41(4):548-556. |
[1] | 王春生, 李剑峰, 张跃强, 樊哲儒, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 夏建强, 王芳平, 赵奇. 新疆主栽春小麦品种花药培养力基因型差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086. |
[2] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[3] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[4] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[5] | 曾婉盈, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤, 李思忠, 钱松廷, 高卫时, 张立明. 甜菜品系叶丛快速生长期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[6] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
[7] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[8] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[9] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
[10] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[11] | 袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[12] | 袁以琳, 颜安, 左筱筱, 侯正清, 张振飞, 肖淑婷, 孙哲, 马梦倩, 赵宇航. 氮肥减量配施生物有机肥对春小麦增产及土壤培肥的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
[13] | 刘旭欢, 于姗, 刘跃, 石书兵. 不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887. |
[14] | 牛婷婷, 马明生, 张军高. 秸秆还田和覆膜对旱作雨养农田土壤理化性质及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
[15] | 赵敏华, 宋秉曦, 张宇鹏, 高志红, 朱勇勇, 陈晓远. 旱作条件下氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮肥偏生产力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 289
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 227
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||