Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2727-2734.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.016
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Yu1(), LYU Ersuo1, Batu 1, XU Shoujun2, XU Guangxiang3, LI Jianbo2, DU Huiting1, LIU Zhiping1()
Received:
2023-02-18
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-12-07
Correspondence author:
LIU Zhiping(1968-),female,native place:Shangdu County,Inner Mongolia;fellows,Masters,Masters tutors,research field:Genetic Breeding of Barley,(E-mail)lllzp2004@126.com
Supported by:
马宇1(), 吕二锁1, 巴图1, 徐寿军2, 徐广祥3, 李建波2, 杜慧婷1, 刘志萍1()
通讯作者:
刘志萍(1968-),女,内蒙古商都人,研究员,硕士,硕士生导师,研究方向为大麦遗传育种,(E-mail)lllzp2004@126.com
作者简介:
马宇(1993-),女,黑龙江佳木斯人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为大麦遗传育种,(E-mail)mayu3991@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
MA Yu, LYU Ersuo, Batu , XU Shoujun, XU Guangxiang, LI Jianbo, DU Huiting, LIU Zhiping. Adaptability analysis and application evaluation of high and stable yield of new barley variety Mengpimai 5[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2727-2734.
马宇, 吕二锁, 巴图, 徐寿军, 徐广祥, 李建波, 杜慧婷, 刘志萍. 大麦新品种蒙啤麦5号丰产稳产适应性分析及应用评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2727-2734.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.016
品种名称 Variety name | 2012年 | 2013年 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Production (kg/hm2) | 较CK± Compare CK± (%) | 产量位次 Production ranking | 增产点率 Yield increase rate(%) | 产量 Production (kg/hm2) | 较CK± Compare CK± (%) | 产量位次 Production ranking | 增产点率 Yield increase rate(%) | |
10PJ-03 | 5 070.4 | 18.88 | 1 | 60 | 4 393.28 | 3.66 | 8 | 40 |
10PJ-04 | 4 347.2 | -2.56 | 9 | 60 | - | - | - | - |
10PJ-13 | 4 675.2 | 10.54 | 5 | 80 | 4 413.79 | 4.72 | 7 | 60 |
蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 | 4 921.6 | 17.36 | 3 | 80 | 4 914.27 | 16.97 | 2 | 80 |
10PJ-51 | 4 464.0 | 0.72 | 7 | 40 | 4 652.55 | 7.4 | 5 | 60 |
09GW-07 | 5 065.6 | 17.81 | 2 | 80 | 5 032.62 | 17.13 | 1 | 80 |
08PJ-25 | 4 915.2 | 11.34 | 4 | 80 | 4 903.32 | 11.58 | 3 | 80 |
09PJ-31 | 4 272.0 | 0.88 | 10 | 40 | - | - | - | - |
09PJ-38 | 4 256.0 | -9.20 | 11 | 40 | 4 255.15 | -3.69 | 9 | 40 |
09PJ-39 | 4 507.2 | 3.52 | 6 | 60 | 4 812.5 | 13.64 | 4 | 60 |
蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 | 4422.4 | 0 | 8 | - | 4 462.46 | 0 | 6 | - |
Tab.1 Yield performance of barley regional test in Inner Mongolia from 2012 to 2013
品种名称 Variety name | 2012年 | 2013年 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Production (kg/hm2) | 较CK± Compare CK± (%) | 产量位次 Production ranking | 增产点率 Yield increase rate(%) | 产量 Production (kg/hm2) | 较CK± Compare CK± (%) | 产量位次 Production ranking | 增产点率 Yield increase rate(%) | |
10PJ-03 | 5 070.4 | 18.88 | 1 | 60 | 4 393.28 | 3.66 | 8 | 40 |
10PJ-04 | 4 347.2 | -2.56 | 9 | 60 | - | - | - | - |
10PJ-13 | 4 675.2 | 10.54 | 5 | 80 | 4 413.79 | 4.72 | 7 | 60 |
蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 | 4 921.6 | 17.36 | 3 | 80 | 4 914.27 | 16.97 | 2 | 80 |
10PJ-51 | 4 464.0 | 0.72 | 7 | 40 | 4 652.55 | 7.4 | 5 | 60 |
09GW-07 | 5 065.6 | 17.81 | 2 | 80 | 5 032.62 | 17.13 | 1 | 80 |
08PJ-25 | 4 915.2 | 11.34 | 4 | 80 | 4 903.32 | 11.58 | 3 | 80 |
09PJ-31 | 4 272.0 | 0.88 | 10 | 40 | - | - | - | - |
09PJ-38 | 4 256.0 | -9.20 | 11 | 40 | 4 255.15 | -3.69 | 9 | 40 |
09PJ-39 | 4 507.2 | 3.52 | 6 | 60 | 4 812.5 | 13.64 | 4 | 60 |
蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 | 4422.4 | 0 | 8 | - | 4 462.46 | 0 | 6 | - |
试验地点 Place | 2014年 | 2015年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 (kg/hm2) | 蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 (kg/hm2) | 较对照增产 Increase production compared to the control(%) | 蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 (kg/hm2) | 蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 (kg/hm2) | 较对照增产 Increase production compared to the control(%) | |
巴彦淖尔市 Bayannaoer shi | 5 538.23 | 5 665.67 | 2.30 | 5 008.40 | 5 178.11 | 3.39 |
特尼河农场 Tenihe nong chang | 2 571.21 | 3 188.91 | 24.02 | 2 811.09 | 3 763.12 | 33.87 |
拉布大林农场 Labudalin nong chang | 4 007.50 | 4 797.60 | 19.72 | 2 899.55 | 3 776.61 | 30.25 |
锡盟太仆寺旗 Ximengtaipusiqi | 2 319.34 | 3 358.32 | 44.80 | - | - | - |
呼和浩特市 Huhehaote shi | - | - | - | 5 566.72 | 5 433.28 | -2.40 |
平均 Average | 3 609.07 | 4 252.62 | 22.71 | 4 071.44 | 4 537.78 | 16.28 |
Tab.2 Yield performance of barley production demonstration test in Inner Mongolia from 2014 to 2015
试验地点 Place | 2014年 | 2015年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 (kg/hm2) | 蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 (kg/hm2) | 较对照增产 Increase production compared to the control(%) | 蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 (kg/hm2) | 蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 (kg/hm2) | 较对照增产 Increase production compared to the control(%) | |
巴彦淖尔市 Bayannaoer shi | 5 538.23 | 5 665.67 | 2.30 | 5 008.40 | 5 178.11 | 3.39 |
特尼河农场 Tenihe nong chang | 2 571.21 | 3 188.91 | 24.02 | 2 811.09 | 3 763.12 | 33.87 |
拉布大林农场 Labudalin nong chang | 4 007.50 | 4 797.60 | 19.72 | 2 899.55 | 3 776.61 | 30.25 |
锡盟太仆寺旗 Ximengtaipusiqi | 2 319.34 | 3 358.32 | 44.80 | - | - | - |
呼和浩特市 Huhehaote shi | - | - | - | 5 566.72 | 5 433.28 | -2.40 |
平均 Average | 3 609.07 | 4 252.62 | 22.71 | 4 071.44 | 4 537.78 | 16.28 |
品种名称 Variety name | 2012年 | 2013年 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小区 产量 Plot yield (kg) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异 系数 Coeffi- cient of varia- tion (%) | 高稳 系数 High stability coeffi- cient (%) | 高稳系 数位次 High stability coeffi- cient order | 适应性 参数 Adapta- bility para- meters | 小区 产量 Plot yield (kg) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异 系数 Coeffi- cient of varia- tion (%) | 高稳 系数 High stability coeffi- cient (%) | 高稳系 数位次 High stability coeffi- cient order | 适应性 参数 Adapta- bility para- meters | |
10PJ-03 | 6.34 | 2.95 | 46.50 | 55.74 | 2 | 1.01 | 5.49 | 2.04 | 37.09 | 56.29 | 5 | 0.84 |
10PJ-04 | 5.43 | 3.00 | 55.25 | 39.98 | 10 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
10PJ-13 | 5.84 | 2.60 | 44.44 | 53.37 | 4 | 0.89 | 5.52 | 1.97 | 35.78 | 57.72 | 4 | 0.82 |
蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 | 6.15 | 2.59 | 42.16 | 58.50 | 1 | 0.89 | 6.14 | 2.10 | 34.24 | 65.82 | 1 | 0.87 |
10PJ-51 | 5.58 | 3.01 | 53.87 | 42.31 | 8 | 1.03 | 5.82 | 2.38 | 40.87 | 56.03 | 6 | 0.98 |
09GW-07 | 6.33 | 2.99 | 47.17 | 55.00 | 3 | 1.02 | 6.29 | 2.54 | 40.39 | 61.10 | 3 | 1.05 |
08PJ-25 | 6.14 | 3.25 | 52.90 | 47.57 | 5 | 1.11 | 6.13 | 2.76 | 45.10 | 54.82 | 7 | 1.14 |
09PJ-31 | 5.34 | 2.50 | 46.83 | 46.68 | 6 | 0.85 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
09PJ-38 | 5.32 | 3.49 | 65.55 | 30.13 | 11 | 1.19 | 5.32 | 3.02 | 56.83 | 37.41 | 9 | 1.25 |
09PJ-39 | 5.63 | 2.85 | 50.63 | 45.72 | 7 | 0.97 | 6.02 | 2.20 | 36.64 | 62.09 | 2 | 0.91 |
蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 | 5.53 | 3.00 | 54.21 | 41.62 | 9 | 1.02 | 5.58 | 2.75 | 49.37 | 46.01 | 8 | 1.14 |
Tab.3 Adaptability analysis of high and stable yield in barley regional test in Inner Mongolia from 2012 to 2013
品种名称 Variety name | 2012年 | 2013年 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小区 产量 Plot yield (kg) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异 系数 Coeffi- cient of varia- tion (%) | 高稳 系数 High stability coeffi- cient (%) | 高稳系 数位次 High stability coeffi- cient order | 适应性 参数 Adapta- bility para- meters | 小区 产量 Plot yield (kg) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异 系数 Coeffi- cient of varia- tion (%) | 高稳 系数 High stability coeffi- cient (%) | 高稳系 数位次 High stability coeffi- cient order | 适应性 参数 Adapta- bility para- meters | |
10PJ-03 | 6.34 | 2.95 | 46.50 | 55.74 | 2 | 1.01 | 5.49 | 2.04 | 37.09 | 56.29 | 5 | 0.84 |
10PJ-04 | 5.43 | 3.00 | 55.25 | 39.98 | 10 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
10PJ-13 | 5.84 | 2.60 | 44.44 | 53.37 | 4 | 0.89 | 5.52 | 1.97 | 35.78 | 57.72 | 4 | 0.82 |
蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 | 6.15 | 2.59 | 42.16 | 58.50 | 1 | 0.89 | 6.14 | 2.10 | 34.24 | 65.82 | 1 | 0.87 |
10PJ-51 | 5.58 | 3.01 | 53.87 | 42.31 | 8 | 1.03 | 5.82 | 2.38 | 40.87 | 56.03 | 6 | 0.98 |
09GW-07 | 6.33 | 2.99 | 47.17 | 55.00 | 3 | 1.02 | 6.29 | 2.54 | 40.39 | 61.10 | 3 | 1.05 |
08PJ-25 | 6.14 | 3.25 | 52.90 | 47.57 | 5 | 1.11 | 6.13 | 2.76 | 45.10 | 54.82 | 7 | 1.14 |
09PJ-31 | 5.34 | 2.50 | 46.83 | 46.68 | 6 | 0.85 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
09PJ-38 | 5.32 | 3.49 | 65.55 | 30.13 | 11 | 1.19 | 5.32 | 3.02 | 56.83 | 37.41 | 9 | 1.25 |
09PJ-39 | 5.63 | 2.85 | 50.63 | 45.72 | 7 | 0.97 | 6.02 | 2.20 | 36.64 | 62.09 | 2 | 0.91 |
蒙啤麦1号 Mengpimai 1 | 5.53 | 3.00 | 54.21 | 41.62 | 9 | 1.02 | 5.58 | 2.75 | 49.37 | 46.01 | 8 | 1.14 |
性状 Character | 相关 系数 Corre- lation coeffi- cient | 直接 系数 Direct coeffi- cient | 间接系数 Indirect coefficient | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效 穗数 Effective ear number | 单株 粒数 Number of grains per plant | 千粒重 1 000 grain weight | |||
有效穗数 Effective ear number | 0.673 | 0.543 | - | 0.422 | -0.292 |
单株粒数 Number of grains per plant | 0.749 | 0.667 | 0.344 | - | -0.262 |
千粒重 1 000 grain weight | 0.403 | -0.41 | 0.387 | 0.426 | - |
Tab.4 Path analysis of yield components of Mengpimai 5
性状 Character | 相关 系数 Corre- lation coeffi- cient | 直接 系数 Direct coeffi- cient | 间接系数 Indirect coefficient | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效 穗数 Effective ear number | 单株 粒数 Number of grains per plant | 千粒重 1 000 grain weight | |||
有效穗数 Effective ear number | 0.673 | 0.543 | - | 0.422 | -0.292 |
单株粒数 Number of grains per plant | 0.749 | 0.667 | 0.344 | - | -0.262 |
千粒重 1 000 grain weight | 0.403 | -0.41 | 0.387 | 0.426 | - |
测定指标 Measurement indicators | 蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 | 国家优级 National premium | 国家一级 National level |
---|---|---|---|
千粒重 1000 grain weight(g) | 53.8 | ≥38 | ≥35 |
饱满粒 Plumpness(%) | 93.45 | ≥85 | ≥80 |
瘦小粒 Thin granule(%) | 5.22 | ≤4 | ≤5 |
发芽率 Germination percentage(%) | 98 | ≥97 | ≥95 |
籽粒蛋白质含量 Grain protein content(%) | 13.6 | 10~12.5 | 10~12.5 |
淀粉含量 Starch(%) | 55.47 | - | - |
纤维 Fiber(%) | 3.61 | - | - |
脂肪 Fat(%) | 2.44 | - | - |
灰分 Ash content(%) | 1.96 | - | - |
β-葡聚糖 β-glucan(%) | 4.39 | - | - |
麦芽浸出物 (以干基计) Malt extract (on a dry basis)(%) | 80 | ≥79 | ≥77 |
库尔巴哈值 Kolbach index(%) | 40.5 | 40~45 | 40~45 |
糖化力 Diastatic power(WK) | 435 | ≥260 | ≥240 |
α-氨基酸(以干基计) α-Amino acid (on a dry basis) (mg/100g) | 153 | ≥150 | ≥140 |
Tab.5 Grain and malt quality of Mengpimai 5
测定指标 Measurement indicators | 蒙啤麦5号 Mengpimai 5 | 国家优级 National premium | 国家一级 National level |
---|---|---|---|
千粒重 1000 grain weight(g) | 53.8 | ≥38 | ≥35 |
饱满粒 Plumpness(%) | 93.45 | ≥85 | ≥80 |
瘦小粒 Thin granule(%) | 5.22 | ≤4 | ≤5 |
发芽率 Germination percentage(%) | 98 | ≥97 | ≥95 |
籽粒蛋白质含量 Grain protein content(%) | 13.6 | 10~12.5 | 10~12.5 |
淀粉含量 Starch(%) | 55.47 | - | - |
纤维 Fiber(%) | 3.61 | - | - |
脂肪 Fat(%) | 2.44 | - | - |
灰分 Ash content(%) | 1.96 | - | - |
β-葡聚糖 β-glucan(%) | 4.39 | - | - |
麦芽浸出物 (以干基计) Malt extract (on a dry basis)(%) | 80 | ≥79 | ≥77 |
库尔巴哈值 Kolbach index(%) | 40.5 | 40~45 | 40~45 |
糖化力 Diastatic power(WK) | 435 | ≥260 | ≥240 |
α-氨基酸(以干基计) α-Amino acid (on a dry basis) (mg/100g) | 153 | ≥150 | ≥140 |
[1] | 杨红燕, 徐肖, 栾海业, 等. 啤酒大麦新品种苏啤8号的选育及栽培技术[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2021, 38(1):60-62. |
YANG Hongyan, XU Xiao, LUAN Haiye, et al. Breeding and Cultivation Techniques of a new beer barley variety super 8[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2021, 38(1):60-62. | |
[2] |
赵准, 李剑, 宋瑞娇, 等. 施氮量对青贮大麦生产性能、氮肥利用率和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5):910-917.
DOI |
ZHAO Zhun, LI Jian, SONG Ruijiao, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Production Performance,Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Barley Silage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(5):910-917.
DOI |
|
[3] | 吕二锁, 巴图, 郭呈宇, 等. 内蒙古东部旱区大麦新品种蒙啤麦5号播期与密度效应分析[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2018, 35(6):17-20. |
LYU Ersuo,Batu, GUO Chengyu, et al. Analysis of Effects of Sowing Date and Density on the Yield of the New Barley Variety 'Mengpimai 5' in Arid Farmland of Eastern Inner Mongolia[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2018, 35(6):17-20. | |
[4] | 杨树明, 普晓英, 张京, 等. 不同地区啤酒大麦品种农艺性状鉴定与分类研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(1):37-41. |
YANG Shuming, PU Xiaoying, ZHANG Jing, et al. Agronomic Characteristics and Classification of Malting Barley from Different Regions[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2011, 12(1):37-41. | |
[5] | 曾亚文, 普晓英, 杜娟, 等. 云南专用大麦产业发展研究进展[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2010,(1):8-13. |
ZENG Yawen, PU Xiaoying, DU Juan, et al. Research Progress on the development of special barley industry in Yunnan[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2010,(1):8-13. | |
[6] | 吕二锁, 巴图, 郭呈宇, 等. 啤酒大麦新品种蒙啤麦5号的选育及栽培技术[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2019, 36(4):61-63. |
LYU Ersuo,Batu, GUO Chengyu, et al. Breeding and Cultivation Techniques of the New Malting Barley Variety' Mengpimai 5'[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2019, 36(4):61-63. | |
[7] | 温振民, 张永科. 用高稳系数法估算玉米杂交种高产稳产性的探讨[J]. 作物学报, 1994, 20(4):508-512. |
WEN Zhenmin, ZHANG Yongke. Study of a Method for Estimation Performance of the High and Stable Yield of Maize Hybrids by the High-stably Yielding Coefficient[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1994, 20(4):508-512. | |
[8] |
Francis T R, Kannenberg L W. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method fur grouping genotypes[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1978, 58(4):1035-1039.
DOI URL |
[9] | 俞世蓉, 吴兆苏. 小麦品种区域试验上几个问题的探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 1986, 19(3):20-25. |
YU Shirong, WU Zhaosu. Disscussions on some Problems in the Regional Tests of Wheat Cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1986, 19(3):20-25. | |
[10] | 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6. |
DU Jiaju, CHEN Zhiwei. Method of path analysis with SPSS linear regression[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2010, 45(2):4-6. | |
[11] |
姚金保, 张鹏, 马鸿翔. 长江中下游地区小麦新品种丰产稳产性的评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(24):1-6.
DOI |
YAO Jinbao, ZHANG Peng, MA Hongxiang. High and Stable Yield Ability of New Wheat Varieties in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River: Evaluation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(24):1-6.
DOI |
|
[12] | 张俊灵, 闫金龙, 冯丽云, 等. 国审小麦新品种长6990的丰产稳产性及适应性分析[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(10):139-142,154,167. |
ZHANG Junling, YAN Jinlong, FENG Liyun. Analysis of High Yield,Stable Yield and Adaptability of Newly State-approved Wheat Variety Chang 6990[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(10):139-142,154,167. | |
[13] |
舒文涛, 耿臻, 杨青春, 等. 国审大豆新品种周豆23号丰产性、稳产性、适应性分析[J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(12):8-10.
DOI |
SHU Wentao, GENG Zhen, YANG qingchun, et al. High Yield, Stability and Adaptability:A National Authorized New Soybean Variety Zhoudou 23[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2016, 6(12):8-10. | |
[14] | 王淑君, 邢璐, 季珊珊, 等. 豫杂谷1号在西北、东北地区的丰产稳产性分析[J]. 中国种业, 2020,(9):61-65. |
WANG Shujun, XING Lu, JI Shanshan, et al. Analysis of High and Stable Yield of Yuzagu No.1 in Northwest and Northeast China[J]. China Seed Industry, 2020,(9):61-65. | |
[15] | 王鹤卿, 陶采成. 二棱大麦产量构成三要素效应的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 1994,(6):19-20,18. |
WANG Heqing, TAO Caicheng. Study on the Effect of Three Factors on Yield Components of Two Rowed Wheat[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 1994,(6):19-20,18. | |
[16] | 周凤云, 李伯群, 余国东, 等. 小麦新品种渝麦13号丰产性、稳产性及适应性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(3):894-898. |
ZHOU Fengyun, LI Boqun, YU Guodong, et al. Analysis of High-yield,Stability and Adaptation of New Wheat Variety Yumai13[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 26(3):894-898. | |
[17] | 刘静, 冯国华, 刘东涛, 等. 江麦23丰产稳产性及产量构成因素分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(8):40-42. |
LIU Jing, FENG Guohua, LIU Dongtao, et al. Analysis of High Yield,Stable Yield and Yield Components of Wheat Variety Jiangmai 23[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(8):40-42. | |
[18] | 黄杰, 王君, 葛昌斌, 等. 基于AMMI模型的小麦品种丰产稳产适应性及品质分析[J]. 作物研究, 2021, 35(6):609-613,620. |
HUANG Jie, WANG Jun, GE Changbin, et al. Analysis of High and Stable Yield Adaptability and Quality of Wheat Varieties Based on AMMI Model[J]. Crop Research, 2021, 35(6):609-613,620. | |
[19] | 冯辉, 王树杰, 郜战宁, 等. 大麦品种驻大麦4号产量构成因素的通径分析[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(7):76-77,81. |
FENG Hui, WANG Shujie, GAO Zhanning, et al. Path Analysis on Yield Components of Barley Cultivar Zhudamai No.4[J]. Seed, 2017, 36(7):76-77,81. | |
[20] | 赵加涛, 刘猛道, 杨向红, 等. 保大麦20号高产稳产性及产量构成因素分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(16):30-32. |
ZHAO Jiatao, LIU Mengdao, YANG Xianghong, et al. Analysis on the High-yield and Stable Yield of Baodamai 20 and Its Yield Components[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(16):30-32. |
[1] | YANG Hanjun, HUANG Xingyu, WANG Xuzhe, ZHANG Fenghua, LUWeihua , ZHANG Fanfan. Effect of drying time in the field on the quality of fermentation of Brassica napus [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1433-1441. |
[2] | XU Pengfei, WANG Xuzhe, YANG Hanjun, HUANG Xingyu, FU Dongqing, $\boxed{\hbox{LU Weihua}}$, SUN Xinwen. Effects of Adding Molasses on the Micro-Storage Quality and Aerobic Stability of Cotton Stalks [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 715-726. |
[3] | Shamixinuer Yasen, LI Xiaorong, CAI Darun, LI Juan, LIU Zhigang, YANG Yang, LI Bo, CHEN Xunji, CHEN Guo. Analysis of influencing factors on corn starch content determination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 301-308. |
[4] | HE Tingting, WANG Xuzhe, SONG Lei, MA Chunhui. Effects of Different Additives on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Cyperus esculentus Silage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1767-1775. |
[5] | WANG Xian, LUO Zhengqian, XU Linli, ZHOU Zhiling, TANG Jun, GAO Haifeng, LIU Enliang, JIN Ping. AMMI Model Analysis of Yield Data of Xinjiang Sweet Potato Region Test [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1093-1098. |
[6] | MA Yan, XU Mingqiang, LI Xidi, MENG Xintao, ZOU Shuping, ZHANG Ting, ZHANG Qian. Optimization of Preparation of Conjugated Linoleic Acid by Alkali Isomerization of Pepper Seed Oil by Response Surface Methodology and Its Oxidation Stability [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 908-915. |
[7] | DU Yuemei, GAO Liping, SHAO Hua. Study on UF and DN of Furoxime and Its Metabolites in Rice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(3): 663-673. |
[8] | DING Feng, PU Shenghai, LÜ Yuping, MA Xiaopeng, SHEN Xiaoming, MO Yan. Effects of Different Irrigation Quotas on Water Consumption Characteristics and Water Production Efficiency of Rice under Film Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1577-1584. |
[9] | LI Ming-dong, LIANG Xiao-ling, Abulaiti·Abula, HAN Deng-xu, YANG Jie, XI Hao-jiang, SHANG Jia-xin, TENG Yuan-xu, YANG Xin-jun, LI Zhao-feng, WANG Ye-jian. Analysis and Evaluation of the Heat Resistance of Maize Inbred Lines at Grain Filling Stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(8): 1382-1387. |
[10] | LI Qing-yun1, PAN Cun-de1, YU Ge-bi2, LI Gui-hua. The Community Stability along the Pyrogenic Succession after Severe Fires in Kanas Taiga [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2054-2061. |
[11] | GAO Jun, YIN Xiao-jun, WANG Chuan-jian, ZHANG Ya. Spatial-temporal Distribution of NPP and Its Climatic Driving Factors in the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountain [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(2): 352-361. |
[12] | ZHANG Qing-qing;YU Hui;AN Sha-zhou;Tuerxunnayi Reyimu;JING Chang-qing. Study on Grassland Eco-economic Function Regionalization in Manas River Basin [J]. , 2017, 54(5): 969-977. |
[13] | NIU Hai-sheng;XU Wen-xiu;Keyumu mijitikeyumu;Saierdaluofu·M. Study on the Productive Potentiality of main Main Crops in Tajikistan [J]. , 2014, 51(3): 583-588. |
[14] | CUI Meng-ning;ZHU Mei-ling;LI Zhu;WANG Xi-bo. Research of Xinjiang Beef Cattle Industry's Total Factor Productivity Based on DEA-Malmquist Index [J]. , 2014, 51(2): 363-369. |
[15] | ZHANG Jie;LIU Xing-ping;YAN Qi. Study on the Social Stability Risk Evaluation of Rural Area Land Expropriation in Xinjiang [J]. , 2013, 50(9): 1743-1747. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||