Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (10): 2495-2501.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.018
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Forestry·Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Huijing(), LI Ziqin, LI Jixin, ZHAO Zhiyong(), SONG Fangyuan()
Received:
2021-11-15
Online:
2022-10-20
Published:
2022-12-21
Correspondence author:
ZHAO Zhiyong, SONG Fangyuan
Supported by:
通讯作者:
赵志永,宋方圆
作者简介:
郭慧静(1993-),女,河南雕县人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为果蔬贮藏与加工,(E-mail) 1505442828@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
GUO Huijing, LI Ziqin, LI Jixin, ZHAO Zhiyong, SONG Fangyuan. Design and Performance Evaluation of Automatic Pressure Tester for Processing Tomato[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2495-2501.
郭慧静, 李自芹, 李冀新, 赵志永, 宋方圆. 加工番茄全自动耐压测定仪的设计与性能评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2495-2501.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.018
Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the structure of tomato fruit pressure tester Note: 1 is the rocking handle, 2 is the screw, 3 is the perforation, 4 is the sliding plate, 5 is the sand pad or water pad, 6 is the fruit to be tested, 7 is the fruit container, 8 is the weighing platform, 9 is the shell, 10 is a compression spring sleeve, 11 is a compression spring, 12 is a bearing, 13 is a positioning cylinder, 14 is a connecting block, 15 is an inflator, 16 is a buffer tank, 17 is an air inlet pipe, 18 is a piston, 19 is an air inlet Port, 20 is the bleed valve, 21 is the cylinder, and 22 is the tension spring.
品种 Variety | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 肉厚 Pulp thickness (mm) | 单果重 Single fruit weight(g) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%) | 粘度 Viscosity (cm/30s) | 番茄红素 Lycopene (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
亨氏1015 Heinz1015 | 1.28b | 7.7a | 64.6a | 5.86b | 8. | 105.7c |
亨氏3402 Heinz3402 | 1.32b | 6.3c | 50.2d | 5.21c | 8.1e | 101.4e |
亨氏3501 Heinz3501 | 1.27b | 7.5a | 55.1c | 6.2a | 9.7a | 111.7b |
石番45 Shifan45 | 1.45a | 7.0b | 60.2b | 6. | 8.7b | 119.2a |
石番56 Shifan56 | 1.25b | 6.0d | 59.7b | 5.25c | 8.5bc | 104.6d |
石番58 Shifan58 | 1.08c | 5.4e | 41.3e | 6.0 | 8. | 98.6f |
Table 1 Determination results of physical and chemical indexes for different varieties of processing tomato
品种 Variety | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 肉厚 Pulp thickness (mm) | 单果重 Single fruit weight(g) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%) | 粘度 Viscosity (cm/30s) | 番茄红素 Lycopene (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
亨氏1015 Heinz1015 | 1.28b | 7.7a | 64.6a | 5.86b | 8. | 105.7c |
亨氏3402 Heinz3402 | 1.32b | 6.3c | 50.2d | 5.21c | 8.1e | 101.4e |
亨氏3501 Heinz3501 | 1.27b | 7.5a | 55.1c | 6.2a | 9.7a | 111.7b |
石番45 Shifan45 | 1.45a | 7.0b | 60.2b | 6. | 8.7b | 119.2a |
石番56 Shifan56 | 1.25b | 6.0d | 59.7b | 5.25c | 8.5bc | 104.6d |
石番58 Shifan58 | 1.08c | 5.4e | 41.3e | 6.0 | 8. | 98.6f |
品种 Variety | 硬度 hardness (N) | 单果耐压力 single fruit stress tolerance (N) | 单果耐压力single fruit stress tolerance(N) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
横放 Horizontal | 变形值 Deformation value(mm) | 竖放 Upright | 变形值 Deformation value(mm) | |||
亨氏1015Heinz1015 | 18.31b | 58b | 25.78c | 9.32d | 29.85b | 12.02b |
亨氏3402Heinz3402 | 16.43d | 50.5d | 24.80d | 9.62c | 21.42d | 9.46d |
亨氏3501Heinz3501 | 17.25c | 44.3e | 26.36b | 8.75e | 21.18e | 7.64f |
石番45Shifan45 | 19.73a | 61.4a | 31.46a | 11.13a | 31.57a | 12.72a |
石番56Shifan56 | 18.26b | 56c | 25.56c | 10.14b | 28.45c | 11.17c |
石番58Shifan58 | 13.93e | 41f | 12.38e | 6.60f | 16.24f | 8.79e |
Table 2 Test results of single fruit stress tolerance for different varieties of processing tomato
品种 Variety | 硬度 hardness (N) | 单果耐压力 single fruit stress tolerance (N) | 单果耐压力single fruit stress tolerance(N) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
横放 Horizontal | 变形值 Deformation value(mm) | 竖放 Upright | 变形值 Deformation value(mm) | |||
亨氏1015Heinz1015 | 18.31b | 58b | 25.78c | 9.32d | 29.85b | 12.02b |
亨氏3402Heinz3402 | 16.43d | 50.5d | 24.80d | 9.62c | 21.42d | 9.46d |
亨氏3501Heinz3501 | 17.25c | 44.3e | 26.36b | 8.75e | 21.18e | 7.64f |
石番45Shifan45 | 19.73a | 61.4a | 31.46a | 11.13a | 31.57a | 12.72a |
石番56Shifan56 | 18.26b | 56c | 25.56c | 10.14b | 28.45c | 11.17c |
石番58Shifan58 | 13.93e | 41f | 12.38e | 6.60f | 16.24f | 8.79e |
品种 Variety | 平均耐压力average stress tolerance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
变形值 Deformation value (mm) | 烂果率 Rotten fruit rate (%) | 重量损失率 Weight loss rate (%) | 耐压性 Pressure resistance (mm/个) | |
亨氏1015Heinz1015 | 22.6e | 6.32d | 6.0d | 3.58b |
亨氏3402Heinz3402 | 26.0b | 10.28b | 11.18b | 2.53c |
亨氏3501Heinz3501 | 26.3b | 10.17b | 11.63b | 2.59c |
石番45Shifan45 | 27.7a | 2.04e | 2.24e | 13.58a |
石番56Shifan56 | 24.3c | 8.25c | 9.08c | 2.95c |
石番58Shifan58 | 23.1d | 18.92a | 13.51a | 1.22d |
Table 3 Test results of average stress tolerance for different varieties of processing tomato
品种 Variety | 平均耐压力average stress tolerance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
变形值 Deformation value (mm) | 烂果率 Rotten fruit rate (%) | 重量损失率 Weight loss rate (%) | 耐压性 Pressure resistance (mm/个) | |
亨氏1015Heinz1015 | 22.6e | 6.32d | 6.0d | 3.58b |
亨氏3402Heinz3402 | 26.0b | 10.28b | 11.18b | 2.53c |
亨氏3501Heinz3501 | 26.3b | 10.17b | 11.63b | 2.59c |
石番45Shifan45 | 27.7a | 2.04e | 2.24e | 13.58a |
石番56Shifan56 | 24.3c | 8.25c | 9.08c | 2.95c |
石番58Shifan58 | 23.1d | 18.92a | 13.51a | 1.22d |
Fig.3 Schematic diagram of test results of processing tomato stress tolerance Note: Picture A is the test result of single tomato stress resistance; Picture B is the test result of average tomato stress resistance (Heinz 3402 as an example)
[1] | 黄志莲. 番茄皮渣的保存[J]. 新疆畜牧业, 2013,(12): 40-41. |
HUANG Zhilian. The preservation of tomato skin residue[J]. Xinjiang Animal Husbandry, 2013,(12): 40-41. | |
[2] | 姚彤, 陈丰. 新疆成为亚洲最大的番茄生产和加工基地[J]. 大陆桥视野, 2012,(8): 74-75. |
YAO Tong, CHEN Feng. Xinjiang becomes the largest tomato production and processing base in Asia[J]. Land Bridge Vision, 2012,(8): 74-75. | |
[3] | 新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年鉴[J]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019. |
Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook[J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019. | |
[4] | 甘中祥, 闫德林, 李倍金, 等. 新疆加工番茄机械收获发展探讨[J]. 西北园艺(综合), 2015,(3): 17-19. |
GAN Zhongxiang, YAN Delin, LI Beijin, et al. Discussion on the development of processing tomato harvesting machinery in Xinjiang[J]. Northwest Horticulture (General), 2015,(3): 17-19. | |
[5] | 邓小蓉, 宋方圆, 赵志永, 等. 新疆加工番茄采后损耗分析与减损对策[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(4): 191-195. |
DENG Xiaorong, SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, et al. Detraction countermeasures and analysis of postharvest wastage of Xinjiang processing tomatoes[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(4): 191-195. | |
[6] | 张静, 白瑞, 贾莹, 等. 番茄种质资源的多样性和聚类分析[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2018, 31(2): 11-14. |
ZHANG Jing, BAI Rui, JIA Ying, et al. Diversity and cluster analysis of tomato germplasm resources[J]. Chinese Melons, 2018, 31(2): 11-14. | |
[7] | 杨涛, 杨生保, 李宁, 等. 番茄ILs 果实耐压力测定及与其它果实性状相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(8) : 1373-1381. |
YANG Tao, YANG Shengbao, LI Ning, et al. Determination ofpressure tolerance of tomato fruits and correlation analysis of fruittraits with other fruits[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(8) : 1373-1381. | |
[8] | 王虹, 周心智, 杨丽, 等. 质构仪测定番茄硬度方法的比较[J]. 南方农业, 2009, 3(6):40-43. |
WANG Hong, ZHOU Xinzhi, YANG Li, et al. Comparison of the methods of texture analyzer for measuring tomato hardness[J]. Southern Agriculture, 2009, 3(6): 40-43. | |
[9] | 宋方圆, 赵志永, 李冀新. 筛选品质优良的新疆主栽加工番茄品种[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(7):96-104. |
SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, LI Jixin. Screening of high-quality main processed tomato varieties in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(7): 96-104. | |
[10] | 赵有为, 任成伟. 介绍一种测定番茄果实耐压性的装置[J]. 中国蔬菜, 1985, 1(2): 25-30. |
ZHAO Youwei, REN Chengwei. Introducing a device for measuring the pressure tolerance of tomato fruits[J]. China Vegetables, 1985, 1(2): 25-30. | |
[11] | Robinson A V. Method and apparatus for non-destructive measurement of firmness index and calculation of firmness[P]. United States: US00591826, 1999. |
[12] | CN204027936U.用于测定加工番茄果实耐压性的装置[P]. |
CN204027936U.Apparatus for measuring the pressure tolerance of processed tomato fruits[P]. | |
[13] | 王海波, 李慧峰, 何平, 等. 苹果不同果形果实性状及其相关性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2013, (3): 22-25. |
WANG Haibo, LI Huifeng, HE Ping, et al. Fruit traits of different apple shapes and their correlation analysis[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2013,(3): 22-25. | |
[14] | 滕秀兰, 蒲陆梅, 王兴民. 分光光度法测定番茄红素[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2013, 49(11):1385-1386,1388. |
TENG Xiulan, PU Lumei, WANG Xingmin. Determination of lycopene by spectrophotometry[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part B: Chemistry, 2013, 49(11): 1385-1386,1388. | |
[15] | 王子华, 付志一, 邓西民. 果实硬度和脆性的测量方法探索[C]. 北京: 北京力学会第十六届学术年会论文集. 2010. |
WANG Zihua, FU Zhiyi, DENG Ximin. Research on the measurement methods of fruit hardness and brittleness[C]. Beijing:Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of Beijing Society of Mechanics, 2010. | |
[16] | 何连顺, 姜涛, 张革. 机采优质加工番茄新品种石番45号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2019, (11): 89-91. |
HE Lianshun, JIANG Tao, ZHANG Ge. A new processing tomato variety-'Shifan No.45' with machine-picking and high-quality[J]. China Vegetables, 2019, (11): 89-91. | |
[17] | 刘超. 新疆番茄加工产业的现状及发展前景分析[J]. 现代食品, 2018, 2(13):4-5,9. |
LIU Chao. Analysisonthe status quo and development prospect of processing tomato industry in Xinjiang[J]. Modern Food, 2018, 2(13):4-5,9. | |
[18] | 韩泽群, 姜波. 加工番茄品质性状的鉴定指标和筛选方法[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(16):3812-3816. |
HAN Zequn, JIANG Bo. Identification indexes and screening methods of processing tomato quality traits[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 53(16):3812-3816. | |
[19] | 王子华, 付志一, 邓西民. 果实硬度和脆性的测量方法探索[C]. 北京力学会第十六届学术年会论文集. 2010. |
WANG Zihua, FU Zhiyi, DENG Ximin. Research on the measurement methods of fruit hardness and brittleness[C]. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of Beijing Society of Mechanics, 2010. |
[1] | LIN Qing, SHI Yingwu, WANG Na, HUA Lanlan, YANG Hongmei, CHU Min, ZENG Jun, GAO Yan, HUO Xiangdong. Screening and Identification of Systemic Resistant Inducing Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Their Effects on Growth and Disease Prevention of Processing Tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1466-1474. |
[2] | HE Wei, LUO Wenfang, YU Zhenhua, XU Jianjun, SUN Xiaojun. Growth Promoting Effect and Safety Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis JTB8-2 on Processed Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1260-1269. |
[3] | WANG Fei, QIU Guang, LUO Wenfang, SUN Xiaojun, YANG Hongmei, LIU Chengjun, XU Jianjun, HE Wei. Study on Application Technology of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B1619 in Promoting Healthy Growth of Tomato Seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1252-1259. |
[4] | WANG Haiqi, PANG Shengqun, DU Hongyan, JI Xuehua, MA Haixiang, ZHANG Xiaoyan. Correlation Analysis between Source Hormone Content and Plant Growth during Processing Tomato Growth [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(1): 40-48. |
[5] | SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, LI Jixin. Selection of Main-Planted Tomato Varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(7): 1267-1275. |
[6] | HE Wei;XU Jian-jun;YANG Hua;CUI Yuan-yu;SUN Xiao-jun. Study on Pest Species and Population Dynamics Based on Application of Insect Sex Lures in Processing Tomato Fields [J]. , 2016, 53(9): 1618-1624. |
[7] | TIAN Tong;LIU Xin-ping;ZHAO Jun. Performance Evaluation of Utilization of Agro-Pastoral Resources in Tarim River Basin [J]. , 2015, 52(5): 975-979. |
[8] | TIAN Tong;LIU Xin-ping;ZHAO Jun. Performance Evaluation of Utilization of Agro-Pastoral Resources in Tarim River Basin [J]. , 2015, 52(5): 975-979. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||