Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2240-2246.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.019
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing·Soil Fertilizer·Water Saving Irrigation·Prataculture·Food Process Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
YUAN Huawei1(), WEI Yi1, ZHAO Yu1, TAO Tao1, ZHOU Min1, JIANG Jiajun1, LI Li1, XU Zhou1, TANG Jiang2, LOU Kai1()
Received:
2020-12-07
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2023-01-16
Correspondence author:
LOU Kai
Supported by:
袁华伟1(), 魏溢1, 赵余1, 陶涛1, 周敏1, 江佳骏1, 李莉1, 徐洲1, 唐江2, 娄恺1()
通讯作者:
娄恺
作者简介:
袁华伟(1967-),男,四川安岳人,研究员,博士,研究方向为发酵食品生产与品质控制, (E-mail)843204747@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YUAN Huawei, WEI Yi, ZHAO Yu, TAO Tao, ZHOU Min, JIANG Jiajun, LI Li, XU Zhou, TANG Jiang, LOU Kai. Formulation Optimization of Cookie With Okara Pleurotus eryngii Mycelium[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2240-2246.
袁华伟, 魏溢, 赵余, 陶涛, 周敏, 江佳骏, 李莉, 徐洲, 唐江, 娄恺. 豆渣杏鲍菇菌丝曲奇饼干的配方优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2240-2246.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.019
水平 Level | A菌丝体 添加量 Mycelium addition (%) | B糖粉 添加量 Sugar addition (%) | C黄油 添加量 Butter addition (%) | D鸡蛋 添加量 Egg addition (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 31 | 4 | 43 |
2 | 6 | 32 | 4 | 45 |
3 | 7 | 33 | 4 | 47 |
Table 1 Factors level of orthogonal experiment for formula optimization
水平 Level | A菌丝体 添加量 Mycelium addition (%) | B糖粉 添加量 Sugar addition (%) | C黄油 添加量 Butter addition (%) | D鸡蛋 添加量 Egg addition (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 31 | 4 | 43 |
2 | 6 | 32 | 4 | 45 |
3 | 7 | 33 | 4 | 47 |
项目Item | 评分标准 Standard for evaluation | 得分 Score |
---|---|---|
色泽(20分) Color(20 points) | 呈深黄且均匀,无焦边,有油润感 呈深黄色,表面色泽较均匀,稍有过焦、过白现象 颜色过深,有过焦、过白现象 | 15~20 10~15 1~10 |
气味(15分) Odor(15 points) | 有明显的香味,无异味 有微微香味,无异味 有焦糊的苦味,无香味,有异味 | 10~15 5~10 1~5 |
口感滋味(30分) Flavor(30 points) | 口感酥松可口,不黏牙 口感较酥松,不黏牙 口感坚硬,紧实发艮,黏牙 | 20~30 10~20 1~10 |
外观形态(15分) Shape(15 points) | 外形完整,线路清楚,饼形摊散适度,无连边 外形完整,纹路较清楚,饼形摊散适度,少许连边 外形不完整,纹路不清楚,饼形摊散不足,有连边 | 10~15 5~10 1~5 |
组织结构(20分) Tissues structure (20 points) | 断面结构呈细密多孔状,无较大孔洞 断面结构呈分散多孔状,空洞大小不一 断面结构无孔洞 | 15~20 10~15 1~10 |
Table2 Cookie sensory evaluation score table
项目Item | 评分标准 Standard for evaluation | 得分 Score |
---|---|---|
色泽(20分) Color(20 points) | 呈深黄且均匀,无焦边,有油润感 呈深黄色,表面色泽较均匀,稍有过焦、过白现象 颜色过深,有过焦、过白现象 | 15~20 10~15 1~10 |
气味(15分) Odor(15 points) | 有明显的香味,无异味 有微微香味,无异味 有焦糊的苦味,无香味,有异味 | 10~15 5~10 1~5 |
口感滋味(30分) Flavor(30 points) | 口感酥松可口,不黏牙 口感较酥松,不黏牙 口感坚硬,紧实发艮,黏牙 | 20~30 10~20 1~10 |
外观形态(15分) Shape(15 points) | 外形完整,线路清楚,饼形摊散适度,无连边 外形完整,纹路较清楚,饼形摊散适度,少许连边 外形不完整,纹路不清楚,饼形摊散不足,有连边 | 10~15 5~10 1~5 |
组织结构(20分) Tissues structure (20 points) | 断面结构呈细密多孔状,无较大孔洞 断面结构呈分散多孔状,空洞大小不一 断面结构无孔洞 | 15~20 10~15 1~10 |
实验号 Experiment number | A | B | C | D | 评分 Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 70.08 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 83.48 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 77.32 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 90.42 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 89.04 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 83.88 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 80.78 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 83.38 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 87.72 |
k1j | 230.88 | 241.28 | 237.34 | 246.84 | |
k2j | 263.34 | 255.9 | 261.62 | 248.14 | |
k3j | 251.88 | 248.92 | 247.14 | 251.12 | |
k1j均值 K1j average value | 76.96 | 80.43 | 79.11 | 82.28 | |
k2j均值 K1j average value | 87.78 | 85.30 | 87.21 | 82.71 | |
k3j均值 K1j average value | 83.96 | 82..97 | 82.38 | 83.71 | |
R | 10.82 | 4.87 | 8.09 | 1.43 | |
主次因素 Primary and secondary factors | A>C>B>D | ||||
最佳组合 Best Combination |
Table 3 Range analysis of orthogonal experiment for formula optimization
实验号 Experiment number | A | B | C | D | 评分 Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 70.08 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 83.48 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 77.32 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 90.42 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 89.04 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 83.88 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 80.78 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 83.38 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 87.72 |
k1j | 230.88 | 241.28 | 237.34 | 246.84 | |
k2j | 263.34 | 255.9 | 261.62 | 248.14 | |
k3j | 251.88 | 248.92 | 247.14 | 251.12 | |
k1j均值 K1j average value | 76.96 | 80.43 | 79.11 | 82.28 | |
k2j均值 K1j average value | 87.78 | 85.30 | 87.21 | 82.71 | |
k3j均值 K1j average value | 83.96 | 82..97 | 82.38 | 83.71 | |
R | 10.82 | 4.87 | 8.09 | 1.43 | |
主次因素 Primary and secondary factors | A>C>B>D | ||||
最佳组合 Best Combination |
质构参数 Texture parameters | 普通曲奇饼干 Ordinary cookies | 豆渣杏鲍菇菌丝体饼干 Bean dregs Pleurotus eryngii mycelium cookies |
---|---|---|
硬度 Hardness (N) | 149.13±0.62 | 116.74±0.56 |
咀嚼性 Chewiness (N) | 1.48±0.01 | 2.95±0.01 |
黏性 Viscosity (N·s) | -0.20±0.01 | -0.19±0.01 |
脆性 Fragility (N) | 104.65±1.02 | 93.12±0.87 |
氨基酸态氮 Amino acid nitrogen (g/100g) | 0.96±0.01 | 1.03±0.02 |
感官评分 Cookie sensory evaluation (score) | 87.39±1.02 | 90.42±0.98 |
Table 4 Quality comparison of cookie
质构参数 Texture parameters | 普通曲奇饼干 Ordinary cookies | 豆渣杏鲍菇菌丝体饼干 Bean dregs Pleurotus eryngii mycelium cookies |
---|---|---|
硬度 Hardness (N) | 149.13±0.62 | 116.74±0.56 |
咀嚼性 Chewiness (N) | 1.48±0.01 | 2.95±0.01 |
黏性 Viscosity (N·s) | -0.20±0.01 | -0.19±0.01 |
脆性 Fragility (N) | 104.65±1.02 | 93.12±0.87 |
氨基酸态氮 Amino acid nitrogen (g/100g) | 0.96±0.01 | 1.03±0.02 |
感官评分 Cookie sensory evaluation (score) | 87.39±1.02 | 90.42±0.98 |
检测项目 Test items | 依照标准 Standard | 检测方法 Test method | 限量值 Limited value | 检测结果 Test results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
理化指标 Physico-chemical factor | 水分(H2O)% | GB5009.3-2010 | 直接干燥法 | ≤4.0 | 3.60±0.03 |
酸价(KOH)(mg/g) | GB5009.229-2016 | 冷溶剂自动电位滴定法 | ≤5 | 0.50±0.01 | |
过氧化值(以脂肪计)(g/100g) | GB5009.227-2016 | 滴定法 | ≤0.25 | 0.14±0.00 | |
脂肪(g/100g) | GB5009.6-2016 | 索氏抽提法 | ≥16.0 | 27.32±0.25 | |
微生物指标 Microbiological indicators | 菌落总数(CFU/g) | GB4789.2-2016 | 平板计数法 | ≤105 | 600±10 |
大肠杆菌数(CFU/g) | GB4789.3-2016 | 平板计数法 | ≤102 | 30±1 | |
霉菌(CFU/g) | GB4789.15-2016 | 平板计数法 | ≤50 | 未检出 |
Table 5 Quality test results of cookie with okara Pleurotus eryngii Mycelium
检测项目 Test items | 依照标准 Standard | 检测方法 Test method | 限量值 Limited value | 检测结果 Test results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
理化指标 Physico-chemical factor | 水分(H2O)% | GB5009.3-2010 | 直接干燥法 | ≤4.0 | 3.60±0.03 |
酸价(KOH)(mg/g) | GB5009.229-2016 | 冷溶剂自动电位滴定法 | ≤5 | 0.50±0.01 | |
过氧化值(以脂肪计)(g/100g) | GB5009.227-2016 | 滴定法 | ≤0.25 | 0.14±0.00 | |
脂肪(g/100g) | GB5009.6-2016 | 索氏抽提法 | ≥16.0 | 27.32±0.25 | |
微生物指标 Microbiological indicators | 菌落总数(CFU/g) | GB4789.2-2016 | 平板计数法 | ≤105 | 600±10 |
大肠杆菌数(CFU/g) | GB4789.3-2016 | 平板计数法 | ≤102 | 30±1 | |
霉菌(CFU/g) | GB4789.15-2016 | 平板计数法 | ≤50 | 未检出 |
[1] |
VONG W C, LIU S Q. Biovalorisation of okara (soybean residue) for food and nutrition[J]. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2016, 52:139 -147.
DOI URL |
[2] |
COLLETTI A, ATTROVIO A, BOFFA L, et al. Valorisation of by-products from soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) processing[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(9):2129-2161.
DOI URL |
[3] | 吴占威, 胡志和. 大豆豆渣的生理功能及其在食品中的应用[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(19):366-370. |
WU Zhanwei, HU Zhihe. Physiological Functions of Okara and Its Application in Foods[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(19):366-370. | |
[4] |
VONG W C, LIU S Q. Changes in volatile profile of soybean residue (okara) upon solid-state fermentation by yeasts[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2017, 97(1):135-143.
DOI PMID |
[5] | 申春莉, 李曼, 沙见宇, 等. 灵芝菌丝体固态发酵豆渣的营养成分变化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(12):114-119. |
SHEN Chunli, LI Man, SHA Jianyu, et al. Nutrient changes in solid-state fermented okara with Ganoderma lucidum[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(12):114-119. | |
[6] |
Vong W C, Hua X Y, Liu S Q. Solid-state fermentation with Rhizopus oligosporus and Yarrowia lipolytica improved nutritional and flavour properties of okara[J]. LWT-Food Science Technology, 2018, 90:316-322.
DOI URL |
[7] | 吴永祥, 吴丽萍, 朴银美. 药( 食) 真菌发酵豆渣的主要功能物质及生物活性变化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(15):100-106. |
WU Yongxiang, WU Liping, PARK Eunmi, et al. Changes in main functional substances and biological activities of okara fermented with medicinal and edible fungi[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(15):100-106. | |
[8] |
LI S Q, SHAH N P. Characterization, antioxidative and bifidogenic effects of polysaccharides from Pleurotus eryngii after heat treatments[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 197: 240-249.
DOI URL |
[9] |
YUAN B, MA N, ZHAO L, et al. In vitro and in vivo inhibitory effects of a Pleurotus eryngii protein on colon cancer cells[J]. Food and Function, 2017, 8(10):3553-3562.
DOI URL |
[10] |
REN Z Z, LI J, XU N, et al. Anti-hyperlipidemic and antioxidant effects of alkali-extractable mycelia polysaccharides by Pleurotus eryngii var. tuolensis[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 175:282-292.
DOI URL |
[11] | YUAN B, ZHAO L, RAKARIYATHAM K, et al. Isolation of a novel bioactive protein from an edible mushroom Pleurotus eryngii and its anti-inflammatory potential[J]. Food & Function, 2017, 8(6):2175-2183. |
[12] | 袁华伟, 陶涛, 周敏, 等. 豆渣固态发酵培养杏鲍菇菌丝体[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2018, 18(12):65-69. |
YUAN Huawei, TAO Tao, ZHOU Min, et al. Solid State Fermentation of Soybean Residue to Cultivate Pleurotus Eryngii Mycelia[J]. Journal of Yibin university, 2018, 18(12):65-69. | |
[13] | 李颖, 崔少宁, 谢玮, 等. 豆渣饼干的研制[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2019, 32(12):22-24. |
LI Ying, CUI Shaoning, XIE Wei, et al. The development of soybean dreg biscuit[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2019, 32(12):22-24. | |
[14] | 刘晶晶, 俞琴玉, 蔡娇娇, 等. 杏鲍菇饼干的生产工艺及货架期预测[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(1):257-260. |
LIU Jingjing, YU Qinyu, CAI Jiaojiao, et al. Study on technology of Pleurotus eryngii biscuits and its shelf life determination[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, 38(1):257-260. | |
[15] | 邓楚君, 康芳芳, 靳羽慧, 等. 杏鲍菇韧性饼干制备工艺研究[J]. 食用菌, 2017, (4):59-61. |
DENG Chujun, KANG Fangfang, JIN Yuhui, et al. Study on the preparation technology of Pleurotus eryngii tough biscuit[J]. Edible Fungi, 2017, (4):59-61. | |
[16] | GB 5009. 235-2016. 食品中氨基酸态氮的测定[S]. |
GB 5009.235-2016. Determination of Amino Acid Nitrogen in Food[S]. | |
[17] | GB 5009. 227-2016. 食品中过氧化值的测定[S]. |
GB 5009.227-2016. Determination of Peroxide Value in Food [S]. | |
[18] | GB 5009. 229-2016. 食品中酸价的测定[S]. |
GB 5009.227-2016. Determination of Peroxide Value in Food[S]. | |
[19] | GB 5009. 3-2010. 食品中水分的测定[S]. |
GB 5009.3-2010. Determination of Moisture in Food[S]. | |
[20] | GB 7100-2015. 饼干[S]. |
GB 7100-2015. Biscuits[S]. | |
[21] | 王颖周, 仰振中, 潘阳, 等. 玉米曲奇饼干配方优化及其质构研究[J]. 包装与食品机械, 2013, 31(3):22-24+6. |
WANG Yingzhou, YANG Zhenzhong, PAN Yang, et al. Study on the Formula and Texture Characteristics of Corn Cookies[J]. Packaging and Food Machinery, 2013, 31(3):22-24+6. | |
[22] |
TAVARES B O, SILVA E P, SILVA V S N, et al. Stability of gluten free sweet biscuit elaborated with rice bran, broken rice and okara[J]. Food Sci Technol. 2016, 36(2):296-303.
DOI URL |
[23] | 苟青松, 胡伟, 王展, 等. 添加豆渣对苏打饼干制作过程及品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(16):39-44. |
GOU Qingsong, HU Wei, WANG Zhang, et al. Effect of Bean Pule on Processing and Quality of Soda Biscuits[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(16):39-44. | |
[24] | BIAO Y, CHEN X, WANG S, et al. Impact of mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii) flour upon quality attributes of wheat dough and functional cookies-baked products[J]. Food Science & Nutrition. 2020; 8(1):361-370. |
[25] | 李云波, 钱静, 靳羽慧, 等. 添加杏鲍菇粉对韧性饼干品质特性的影响[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版, 2018, 46(2):24-28. |
LI Yunbo, QIAN Jing, JIN Yuhui, et al. Effect of Pleurotus eryngii powder addition on the characteristics of semi hard biscuit[J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology, 2018, 46(2):24-28. | |
[26] | 刘传富, 董海洲, 侯汉学. 影响饼干质量的关键因素分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2002, (8):87-89. |
LIU Chuanfu, DONG Haizhou, HOU Hanxue. Analysis of the kev factors influencing biscuits' quality[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2002, (8):87-89. | |
[27] |
GONG S X, XU B, GU X Z, et al. Study on the effects of sugar alcohols and Angelica keiskei flour on cookie quality, antioxidant, and nutrition[J]. Cereal Chem. 2020, 97(3):714-722.
DOI URL |
[28] | 王小平, 雷激, 孙曼兮. 低糖紫薯酥性饼干配方优化[J]. 食品科技, 2016, 41(1): 116-121. |
WANG Xiaoping, LEI Ji, SUN Manxi. Formulation optimization of low sugar purple sweet potato crisp biscuit[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2016, 41(1): 116-121.
DOI URL |
[1] | HOU Liangzhong, GUO Tongjun, ZHANG Junyu, SU Lingling, Guzalnur Amat, WEN Xiaoyan, ZHU Xiaofang, YANG Jianzhong, WANG Wenqi. Effect Evaluation of Mixed Storage of Different Proportions of Seed Pumpkin Waste and Corn Straw [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 567-573. |
[2] | CAO Junmei, Halidan Yikeremu, LIU Na, LIU Lianzheng, ZHOU Anding, WU Xinyuan, NIE Shihui, ZHANG Xinzhong, LU Jing, Burelihan Tuoheti. Relationship between Quality Traits of Leading Xinjiang Winter Wheat Cultivar and Sensory Evaluation of Ordinary [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(5): 840-851. |
[3] | Yibadaiti Yimiti;Ainiwaer Aishan;LI Xin-ze;CUI Wei-dong;Aihemaiti Rexiti. Effects of Formaldehyde Additives on Sensory Evaluation Index of Refermented Half-dry Silage of Xinjiang Sorghum Small Reed Stapf's [J]. , 2015, 52(10): 1932-1938. |
[4] | Baerguli Sufuer;Ainiwaer Aishan;AN Sha-zhou;Yibadaiti Yimiti;Sirejiguli Ashan. Effects of Adding Formaldehyde Additives on Fermented Half-Dry Silage of Sorghum Sudanense Stapf for Nutrients Change Rule [J]. , 2014, 51(10): 1900-1906. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||