不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.07.001

新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (7): 1177-1187.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.07.001

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子生物学 • 下一篇

不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响

杜刚锋¹, 汪江涛¹, 孙雪冰¹, 向导², 勾玲¹, 张旺锋¹

1.石河子大学农学院／新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室,新疆石河子 832003;
2.新疆乌兰乌苏农业气象试验站,新疆石河子 832003

收稿日期:2019-04-22 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-09-05
通信作者: 勾玲(1966-),女,重庆涪陵人,教授,博士,研究方向为作物高产抗逆栽培生理,(E-mail)glxj8162@sina.com.cn
作者简介:杜刚锋(1994-),男,新疆伊犁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物高产优质高效栽培,(E-mail)1184809589@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金联合基金重点项目(U1203283)

Effects of Irrigation Method and Irrigation Amount on Cotton Crown Leaf Boll Configuration

DU Gang-feng¹, WANG Jiang-tao¹, SUN Xue-bing¹, XIANG Dao², GOU Ling¹, ZHANG Wang-feng¹

1. Key Laboratory of Oasis Eco－agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps / College of Agronomy, Shihezi University, Shihezi Xinjiang 832003, China;
2. Wulanwusu Agro－Meteorological Experiment Station of Xinjiang, Shihezi Xinjiang 832003, China

Received:2019-04-22 Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-09-05
Correspondence author: GOU Ling (1966-), female, Chongqing Fuling, professor, Ph.D., the research direction is high yield and stress resistance cultivation of crops, (E-mail) glxj8162@sina.com.cn
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1203283)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】分析膜下滴灌和传统漫灌对棉花叶铃配置关系的影响,研究膜下滴灌棉花高产原理,寻求增产新途径。【方法】设置膜下滴灌和传统漫灌两种灌溉方式,并设两个灌水量:3 900和6 000 m³/hm²,共4个处理。测定棉花叶面积、光吸收率、干物质累积和棉花产量构成因子等指标,分析不同灌溉方式对棉花叶铃配置关系及产量的影响。【结果】盛铃后期,相比传统漫灌,膜下滴灌棉花叶面积指数高出30.66%,冠层上部叶面积指数维持在2~2.5,中下部在1~1.5,冠层各部位光吸收量均匀;同时不同冠层结铃比例适中,与各层光分布比例耦合良好,有利于光合产物生产。3 900 m³/hm²灌水量下,膜下滴灌棉花相对传统漫灌棉花增产25.07%;而6 000 m³/hm²灌水量下,膜下滴灌棉花相对传统漫灌棉花减产6.74%,过量灌水不利于膜下滴灌棉花产量形成。【结论】相比传统漫灌,膜下滴灌棉花叶铃配置更合理,光合生产力更强,有利于光合产物向生殖器官转运和产量形成

关键词: 棉花; 膜下滴灌; 传统漫灌; 叶铃配置; 产量

Abstract: 【Objective】 To explore the effects of drip irrigation under plastic film and traditional flooding irrigation on cotton leaf boll configuration, to clarify the principle of high yield of cotton under plastic film drip irrigation, and to seek new ways to further increase field. 【Method】Two kinds of irrigation methods: drip irrigation under plastic film and traditional flooding irrigation, and two irrigation amounts: 3,900 m³/hm² and 6,000 m³/hm², for a total of 4 treatments. The leaf area, light absorption rate, dry matter accumulation and cotton yield components of cotton were measured, and the effects of different irrigation methods on cotton leaf boll configuration and yield were determined. 【Results】The results showed that in the middle and late growth stages, the leaf area of drip irrigation cotton was 30.66% higher than that of traditional flooding irrigation cotton, and the upper leaf area index of DI-3 cotton was maintained between 2 and 2.5, and the leaf index of DI-3 of the middle and lower parts were between 1 and 1.5. Among them, the light absorption of each part of the canopy is uniform; At the same time, the proportion of boll setting in different crowns was moderate, and the light distribution was well coupled, which was beneficial to the production of photosynthetic products. Under the irrigation of 3,900 m³/hm², the yield of cotton under drip irrigation was 25.07% higher than that of traditional flooding irrigation. Under the irrigation of 6,000 m³/hm², the yield of cotton under drip irrigation was 6.74% lower than that of traditional flooding irrigation. So, it was found that excessive irrigation was not conducive to the formation of drip irrigation cotton yield.【Conclusion】 Compared with traditional flooding irrigation, the leaf boll configuration is more reasonable and the photosynthetic productivity of cotton under film drip irrigation is stronger, which is conducive to the transfer of photosynthetic products to the reproductive organs and the formation of yield.

Key words: cotton; drip irrigation under film; traditional flooding irrigation; leaf boll configuration; yield

中图分类号:

S562

杜刚锋, 汪江涛, 孙雪冰, 向导, 勾玲, 张旺锋. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7): 1177-1187.

DU Gang-feng, WANG Jiang-tao, SUN Xue-bing, XIANG Dao, GOU Ling, ZHANG Wang-feng. Effects of Irrigation Method and Irrigation Amount on Cotton Crown Leaf Boll Configuration[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(7): 1177-1187.

参考文献 38

[1]	Jackson B S, Gerik T J. (1990).Boll shedding and boll load in nitrogen-stressed cotton . Agronomy Journal, 82(3):483-488.
[2]	杨铁钢, 谈春松, 郭红霞. 棉花营养生长和生殖生长关系研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2003, 30(7):13-16.YANG Tie-gang, TANG Chun-song, GUO Hong-xia. (2003).Study on the relationship between vegetative growth and reproductive growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) [J]. China Cotton, 30(7):13-16. (in Chinese)
[3]	Boedhram N, Arkebauer T J, Batchelor W D. (2001).Season-long characterization of vertical distribution of leaf area in Corn[J]. Agronomy Journal, 93(6):1,235-1,242.
[4]	Subedi K D, Ma B L. (2005).Ear position, leaf area, and contribution of individual leaves to grain yield in conventional and leafy maize hybrids . Crop Science, 45(6):2,246.
[5]	Mathew J P, Herbert S J, Shuhuan Z, et al. (2000).Differential response of soybean yield components to the timing of light enrichment. Agronomy Journal, 92(6):1,156-1,162.
[6]	Campbell C S, Heilman J L, Mclnnes K J, et al. (2001).Seasonal variation in radiation use efficiency of irrigated rice . Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 110(1):45-54.
[7]	Ruiz R A, Bertero H D. (2008).Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars . European Journal of Agronomy, 29(2-3):144-152.
[8]	张新国, 陈谦, 张巨松, 等. 超高产棉花器官同伸关系及棉铃空间分布特征的初步研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(1):36-41.ZHANG Xin-guo, CHEN Qian, ZGANG Ju-song, et al. (2010).A study on relation of together growth of organs and cotton bolls spatial distribution of super high-yielding cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 47(1):36-41. (in Chinese)
[9]	Read J J, Reddy K R, Jenkins J N. (2006).Yield and fiber quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition .European Journal Agronomy, 24(3):282-290.
[10]	杜明伟, 冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 等. 杂交棉标杂A_1和石杂2号超高产冠层特性及其与群体光合生产的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(6):1 068-1 077.DU Ming-wei, FENG Guo-yi, YAO Yang-di, et al. (2009).Canopy characteristics and its correlation with photosynthesis of super high-yielding hybrid cotton biaoza A-1 and shiza 2[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 35(6):1,068-1,077.(in Chinese)
[11]	Stewart D W, Costa C, Dwyer L M, et al. Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize . Agronomy Journal, 2003, 95(6):1,465-1,474.
[12]	张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 等. 膜下滴灌对新疆高产棉花群体光合作用冠层结构和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(6):632-637.ZHANG Wang-feng, WANG Zhen-lin, YU Song-lie, et al. (2002).Effect of under-mulch-drip irrigation on canopy apparent photosynthesis, canopy structure and yield formation in high-yield cotton of Xinjiang [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 35(6):632-637.(in Chinese)
[13]	Zhang D, Luo Z, Liu S, et al. (2016).Effects of deficit irrigation and plant density on the growth, yield and fiber quality of irrigated cotton . Field Crops Research, 197:1-9.
[14]	Cowling S A, Field C B. (2003). Environmental control of leaf area production: Implications for vegetation and land-surface modeling . Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17(1):7-14.
[15]	Drewry D T, Kumar P, Long S, et al. (2010). Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 1. Interplay between vertical structure and photosynthetic pathway . Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 115(G4):985-989.
[16]	Drewry D T, Kumar P, Long S, et al. (2010).Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 2. Role of acclimation under elevated CO2. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 115(G4):6,291-6,297.
[17]	Rui Wang, Shu Ji, Zhiguo Zhou, et al.(2016).Drought effects on cotton yield and fiber quality on different fruiting branches . Crop Science, 56:1,265-1,276.
[18]	Yang C, Luo Y, Sun L, et al. (2015).Effect of deficit irrigation on the growth, water use characteristics and yield of cotton in Arid Northwest China . Pedosphere, (6).
[19]	Plénet D, Etchebest S, Mollier A, et al. (2000). Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency. I. Leaf growth . Plant & Soil, 223(1-2):119-132.
[20]	李艳大, 汤亮, 张玉屏, 等. 水稻冠层光截获与叶面积和产量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16):3 296-3 305.LI Yan-da, TANG Liang, ZHANG Yu-ping, et al. (2010).Relationship of PAR interception of canopy to leaf area and yield in rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43(16):3,296-3,305.(in Chinese)
[21]	冯国艺, 姚炎帝, 罗宏海, 等. 新疆超高产棉花冠层光分布特征及其与群体光合生产的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5):1 286-1 294.FENG Guo-yi, YAO Yang-di, LUO Hong-hai, et al. (2012).Canopy light distribution and its correlation with photosynthetic production in super-high yielding cotton fields of Xinjiang, Northwest China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23(5):1,286-1,294. (in Chinese)
[22]	杜明伟, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 等. 新疆超高产杂交棉的光合生产特征研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(6):1 952-1 962.DU Ming-wei, LUO Hong-hai, ZHANG Ya-li, et al. (2009). Photosynthesis characteristics of super-high-yield hybrid cotton in Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42(6):1,952-1,962.(in Chinese)
[23]	Demmig-Adams B, Adams W W. (1992).Photoprotection and Other Responses of Plants to High Light Stress . Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43(1):599-626.
[24]	Fernáandez C J, Mcinnes K J, Cothren J T. (1996).Water status and leaf area production in water- and nitrogen-stressed cotton. Crop Science, 36(5):1,224-1,233.
[25]	Chaves M M, Pereira J S, Maroco J, et al. (2002).How plants cope with water stress in the field Photosynthesis and growth . Annals of Botany, 89(7):907-916.
[26]	Li Z, Wakao S, Fischer B B, et al. (2009).Sensing and responding to excess light . Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60(1):239-260.
[27]	冯国艺. 超高产棉花冠层结构形成机理及调控研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2012.FENG Guo-yi. (2012). Studies on the formation mechanism and regulation of canopy structure in super-high-yield cotton (Gossypium spp.)[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, (in Chinese)
[28]	Ertek A, Ri za Kanber. (2003).Effects of different drip irrigation programs on the boll number and shedding percentage and yield of cotton . Agricultural Water Management, 60(1):1-11.
[29]	Da delen N, Basa al H, Yi lmaz E, et al. (2009).Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey . Agricultural Water Management, 96(1):111-120.
[30]	Ahmed A , Nithya R , Glen R , et al. (2015). Yield, Quality, and Spectral Reflectance Responses of Cotton under Subsurface Drip Irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 107(4):1,355-1,364.
[31]	Wanjura D F, Upchurch D R, Mahan J R, et al. (2002). Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation . Agricultural Water Management, 55(3):217-237.
[32]	Da delen N, Yi lmaz E, Sezgin F, et al. (2006).Water-yield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey . Agricultural Water Management, 82(1-2):0-85.
[33]	Delaune P B, Sij J W, Park S C, et al. (2012).Cotton production as affected by irrigation level and transitioning tillage systems. Agronomy Journal,104(4):991.
[34]	Hunsaker D J, French A N, Waller P M, et al. (2015). Comparison of traditional and ET-based irrigation scheduling of surface-irrigated cotton in the arid southwestern USA. Agricultural Water Management, 159:209-224.
[35]	Yazar A, Sezen S M, Sesveren S. (2007). LEPA and trickle irrigation of cotton in the Southeast Anatolia Project (GAP) area in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, 54(3):189-203.
[36]	Singh Y, Rao S S, Regar P L. (2010).Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on seed cotton yield, water productivity and yield response factor in shallow soils of semi-arid environment . Agricultural Water Management, 97(7):0-970.
[37]	Fereres E, Soriano M A. (2006).Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use . Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2):147-159.
[38]	Janat M, Somi G. (2001).Performance of cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation. II. Field water-use efficiency and dry matter distribution . Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32(19-20):3,063-3,076.

不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响

Effects of Irrigation Method and Irrigation Amount on Cotton Crown Leaf Boll Configuration

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[6]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[7]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[8]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[9]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[10]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[11]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[12]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[13]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[14]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[15]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.