两种香料植物秸秆发酵复配后育苗基质效果评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.03.025

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 735-741.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.03.025

两种香料植物秸秆发酵复配后育苗基质效果评价

于秀针(), 穆晓路, 张杰, 赵超, 李浩, 冯斌()

新疆农业科学院农业机械化研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2022-08-27 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-04-18
通信作者: 冯斌(1968-),男,陕西人,研究员,研究方向为畜牧装备技术,(E-mail)1363569430@qq.com
作者简介:于秀针(1985-),女,河北人,高级农艺师,研究方向为有机废弃物处理与作物栽培,(E-mail)279837509@qq.com
基金资助:
自治区公益性科研院所基本科研业务经费(KY2020107);自治区公益性科研院所基本科研业务经费(KY2021138);财政部和农业农村部:国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-37)

Fermention Process of Two Kinds of Spice Plant Waste Stalk and Evaluation on the Effect of Compound Seeling Substrate

YU Xiuzhen(), MU Xiaolu, ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Chao, LI Hao, FENG Bin()

Research Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2022-08-27 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-04-18
Correspondence author: FENG Bin(1968-),male,Shanxi,Research professor,Post expert of China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA,Research area:Animal husbandry equipment technology,(E-mail)1363569430@qq.com
Supported by:
Basic scientific activities of nono-profit institutes supported the government of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region(KY2020107);Basic scientific activities of nono-profit institutes supported the government of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region(KY2021138);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-37)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究薰衣草和薄荷的废弃秸秆作为蔬菜育苗基质的可行性。【方法】对2种香料植物废弃秸秆进行粉碎和发酵,发酵完成后,分别对发酵后2种植物秸秆进行复配,以番茄为试验作物进行育苗试验。【结果】2种秸秆的发酵45℃以上高温均持续36 d以上,含有丰富的易降解有机物;发酵结束的薰衣草和薄荷秸秆的有机质和营养元素含量较高,其中有机质含量分别达到709.8和688.4 g/kg,全氮、全磷、全钾总含量分别达到3.60%和5.33%,速效磷的含量分别提高了15.57%和19.72%,速效钾的含量分别提高了55.10%和123.50%。与珍珠岩、蛭石复配后的2种秸秆基质的理化性状均在适宜的无土栽培基质的范围内,复配后的2种秸秆基质和复配后的草炭基质对番茄的出苗率、生长指标和幼苗质量等无显著差异,复配后的2种秸秆基质,薄荷秸秆基质在番茄育苗效果表现更优。【结论】2种香料植物秸秆作为蔬菜育苗基质的有机原料可以在生产上应用。

关键词: 薰衣草秸秆; 薄荷秸秆; 发酵; 育苗

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the feasibility of lavender and mint stalks with vegetable seedling substrates as the testing materials.【Methods】 The crushing and fermentation experiments were carried out on two kinds of spice plant waste stalks and the two plant stalks after fermentation were compounded separately with tomato as a test crop to carry out a seedling experiment. 【Results】 The fermentation of the two kinds of stalk at a high temperature above 45℃ lasted for more than 36 days, which showed that the two kinds of stalk were rich in easily degradable organic matter. After fermentation, the content of organic matter and nutrients was high, reaching 709.8 and 688.4 g/kg, and the total content of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium reached 3.60% and 5.33%. The contents of available phosphorus increased by 15.57% and 19.72%, respectively, the contents of available potassium increased by 55.10% and 123.50% respectively. The physical and chemical properties of the two stalk substrates after being mixed with perlite and vermiculite were within the range of suitable soilless culture substrates. Compared to the peat substrate after the compound, there was no significant difference in the emergence rate, growth indicators and seedling quality of the two kinds of stalk substrates after the compounding. Of the two stalk substrates, the mint stalk substrate performed better in tomato seedling cultivation. 【Conclusion】 The two kinds of spice plant stalks can be used in production as organic raw materials for vegetable seedling substrates.

Key words: lavender stalk; mint stalk; ferment; substrate utilization

中图分类号:

S188

于秀针, 穆晓路, 张杰, 赵超, 李浩, 冯斌. 两种香料植物秸秆发酵复配后育苗基质效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 735-741.

YU Xiuzhen, MU Xiaolu, ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Chao, LI Hao, FENG Bin. Fermention Process of Two Kinds of Spice Plant Waste Stalk and Evaluation on the Effect of Compound Seeling Substrate[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 735-741.

图/表 7

图1 香料植物秸秆堆制过程中温度变化

Fig.1 Temperature changes during the composting process of spice plant stalk

图2 香料植物秸秆堆制过程中有机质和有机碳含量变化

Fig.2 Changes of organic matter and organic carbon content during composting process of spice plant stalk

图3 香料植物秸秆堆制过程中全氮含量和C/N变化

Fig.3 Changes of total nitrogen content and C/N during composting process of spice plant stalk

表1 香料植物秸秆堆制前后营养成分含量变化

Tab.1 Changes of nutrient contents of spice plant stalk before and after composting

处理 Treatment	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	全磷 Total phosp horus (g/kg)	全钾 Total potassium (g/kg)	速效氮 Available nitrogen (g/kg)	速效磷 Available Phosphorus (g/kg)	速效钾 Available potassium (g/kg)
发酵前薰衣草秸秆 Lavender straw before	18.24	2.10	12.23	5.20	1.22	16.57
发酵后的薰衣草秸秆 Fermonted Lavender straw	19.67	3.00	25.9	1.29	1.41	25.70
发酵前薄荷秸秆 Mint straw before fermentation	15.08	3.60	17.34	5.40	1.42	13.02
发酵后薄荷秸秆 Mint straw after fermentation	16.85	6.30	30.10	1.30	1.70	29.10

表2 香料植物秸秆复配后基质的理化性状

Tab.2 Analysis of physical and chemical properties about the substrates of spice plant stalk after compounding

处理 Treatment	容重 Bulk density (g/cm³)	总孔隙度 Total porosity (%)	通气孔隙 Ventilation porosity(%)	持水孔隙度 Water-holding porosity(%)	气水比 WHP AP	pH	电导率 (ms/cm) EC
T₁ T₂ T₃ T₄ CK	0.18 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.21	68.64 71.32 72.26 74.38 81.09	32.30 24.46 28.05 20.13 18.12	36.34 46.86 44.21 54.25 62.96	1∶1.43 1∶1.92 1∶1.73 1∶2.69 1∶3.47	8.56 9.13 7.68 7.95 7.06	4.07 4.34 2.28 2.66 0.98

表3 不同复配后基质下番茄出苗率及生长变化

Tab.3 Effects of substrates after compounding on the seedling rate and growth of tomato

处理 Treat- ment	出苗率 Emergence rate(%)	株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Plant height (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)
T₁ T₂ T₃ T₄ CK	91.67^b 93.06^b 97.22^a 98.61^a 97.22^a	21.54^b 20.87^b 22.7 $4 a b$ 23.33^a 23.08^a	3.6 $7 b c$ 3.83^b 4.03^a 4.10^a 4.13^a	143.14^b 142.97^b 148.22^a 150.82^a 147.85^a

表3 不同复配后基质下番茄出苗率及生长变化

Tab.3 Effects of substrates after compounding on the seedling rate and growth of tomato

处理 Treat- ment	出苗率 Emergence rate(%)	株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Plant height (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)
T₁ T₂ T₃ T₄ CK	91.67^b 93.06^b 97.22^a 98.61^a 97.22^a	21.54^b 20.87^b 22.7 $4 a b$ 23.33^a 23.08^a	3.6 $7 b c$ 3.83^b 4.03^a 4.10^a 4.13^a	143.14^b 142.97^b 148.22^a 150.82^a 147.85^a

表4 不同复配后基质下番茄幼苗质量变化

Tab.4 Effects of substrate after compounding on the quality of tomato seedlings

处理 Treatment	鲜重 Fresh weight(g/3株)		干重 Dry weight(mg/3株)		根冠比 Rootshoot ratio	壮苗指数 Seedling index
处理 Treatment	地上部 Aboveground	地下部 Underground	地上部 Aboveground	地下部 Underground	根冠比 Rootshoot ratio	壮苗指数 Seedling index
T₁ T₂ T₃ T₄ CK	12.21^b 12.30^b 13.44^a 13.87^a 13.93^a	1.3 $0 b c$ 1.38^b 1.51^a 1.52^a 1.54^a	949.30^b 957.30^b 988.70^a 1 002.30^a 1 012.00^a	136.00^b 137.80^b 142.40^b 147.80^a 149.10^a	0.143^a 0.144^a 0.144^a 0.147^a 0.146^a	0.174^b 0.178^b 0.18 $3 a b$ 0.190^a 0.189^a

表4 不同复配后基质下番茄幼苗质量变化

Tab.4 Effects of substrate after compounding on the quality of tomato seedlings

处理 Treatment	鲜重 Fresh weight(g/3株)		干重 Dry weight(mg/3株)		根冠比 Rootshoot ratio	壮苗指数 Seedling index
处理 Treatment	地上部 Aboveground	地下部 Underground	地上部 Aboveground	地下部 Underground	根冠比 Rootshoot ratio	壮苗指数 Seedling index
T₁ T₂ T₃ T₄ CK	12.21^b 12.30^b 13.44^a 13.87^a 13.93^a	1.3 $0 b c$ 1.38^b 1.51^a 1.52^a 1.54^a	949.30^b 957.30^b 988.70^a 1 002.30^a 1 012.00^a	136.00^b 137.80^b 142.40^b 147.80^a 149.10^a	0.143^a 0.144^a 0.144^a 0.147^a 0.146^a	0.174^b 0.178^b 0.18 $3 a b$ 0.190^a 0.189^a

参考文献 20

[1]	韩鲁佳, 闫巧娟, 刘向阳, 等. 中国农作物秸秆资源及其利用现状[J]. 农业工程学报, 2002,(3):87-91.
	HAN Lujia, YAN Qiaojuan, LIU Xiangyang, et al. Straw Resources and Their Utilization in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2002,(3):87-91.
[2]	包建财, 郁继华, 冯致, 等. 西部七省区作物秸秆资源分布及利用现状[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1):181-187. PMID
	BAO Jiancai, YU Jihua, FENG Zhii, et al. Situation of distribution and utilization of crop straw resources in seven western provincese[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1):181-187. PMID
[3]	刘文杰, 沈玉君, 孟海波, 等. 牛粪好氧发酵挥发性物质排放特征及恶臭物质分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22):222-230.
	LIU Wenjie, SHEN Yujun, MENG Haibo, et al. Emission characteristics of volatile matter and identification of odor substances during aerobic fermentation of cattle manure[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(22):222-230.
[4]	张程, 黄雅洁, 朱咏莉, 等. 基于园林废弃物的孔雀草栽培基质配方研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(19):122-127.
	ZHANG Cheng, HUANG Yajie, HU Yongli, et al. Study on the formula of maidenhair cultivation substrate based on garden waste[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(19):122-127.
[5]	周新伟, 王海候, 陆长婴, 等. 秸秆堆腐物的基质化改良及育苗效应研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(2):182-190.
	ZHOU Xinwei, WANG Haihou, LU Changying, et al. Study on Improvement of Physicochemical Properties by Composting with Straw and Mushroom Residue and Its Effect on Nursery[J]. Environmental Science &Technology, 2019, 42(2):182-190.
[6]	秦志敏, 赵杰. 薰衣草精油对植物病原菌的毒力研究[J]. 上海农业科技, 2012,(6):127-128.
	QIN Zhimin, ZHAO Jie. Study on the virulence of lavender essential oil to plant pathogenic bacteria[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology of Shanghai, 2012,(6):127-128.
[7]	程作慧, 马新耀, 刘耀华, 等. 薰衣草油与肉桂油对朱砂叶螨的生物活性和行为分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(3):493-500.
	CHENG Zuohui, MA Xinyao, LIU Yaohua, et al. Bioactivities and behaviors of lavender and cinnamon oils against carmine spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus(Boisduval) (Acari: Tetranychidae)[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2016, 43(3):493-500.
[8]	任建军, 师光禄, 古继成. 等. 薄荷提取物对朱砂叶螨体内几种酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(12):85-90.
	REN Jianjun, SHI Guanglu, GU Jicheng. Effects of Mentha piperita Extracts on Activities of Several Enzymes of Tetranychus cinnabarinus[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(12):85-90.
[9]	赵亚娥, 郭娜. 薄荷油体外抗蠕形螨效果及杀螨机制[J]. 昆虫知识, 2007, 44(1):74-78.
	ZHAO Yae, GUO Na. The pesticidal effect and mechanism of peppermint oil in vitro against Demodex[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2007, 44(1):74-78.
[10]	NY525-2012. 有机肥料:[S].
	NY525-2012. Organic fertilizer[S].
[11]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:23-35.
	BAO Shidan. Soil agrochemical analysis (Third Ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000:23-35.
[12]	NY/T2118—2012. 蔬菜育苗基质[S].
	NY/T 2118—2012. Vegetable Seedling Matrix[S].
[13]	崔秀敏,. 王秀峰. 黄瓜穴盘育苗基质特性及育苗效果的研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报: (自然科学版), 2001, 32(2) : 124-128.
	CUI Xiumin, WANG Xiufeng. The features of deveral media for plug-seedlings of cucumber and nursery effect[J]. Journal of Shangtong Agricultural Sciences (Natural Science Ed.), 2001, 32(2) : 124-128.
[14]	赵天涛, 梅娟, 赵由才. 固体废物堆肥原理与技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2017.
	ZHAO Tiantao, MEI Juan, ZHAO Youcai. Principles and technology of solid waste composting[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2017.
[15]	张雪辰, 邓双, 王旭东. 快腐剂对畜禽粪便堆肥过程中腐熟度的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2):888-894.
	ZHANG Xuechen, DENG Shuang, WANG Xudong. Impact of decay promoting agent on maturity changes during composting of livestock and poultry manure[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2):888-894.
[16]	次仁吉保, 赵联芳, 王成, 等. 添加菌剂和不同C/N对葡萄枝条堆肥效果的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(2):71-74.
	Cirenjiebao, ZHAO Lianfang, WANG Chen, et al. Effect of Adding Microbial Agents and Different C/N on Composting of Grape Branches[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(2):71-74.
[17 ]	Li Y, Liu B, Zhang X, et al. Effects of Cu exposure on enzyme activities and selection for microbial tolerances during swine-manure composting[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 283: 512-518 DOI PMID
[18]	李雯, 李停锋, 郭君钰, 等. 菌酶协同处理改善玉米秸秆堆肥品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19):192-199.
	LI Wen, LI Tingfeng, GUO Junyu, et al. Effects of synergistic treatment of microorganism and enzyme improving composting quality of maize stoves[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 192-199.
[19]	赵倩, 仪泽会, 毛丽萍. 番茄穴盘育苗基质筛选试验[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(11):1878-1881.
	ZHAO Jing, YI Zehui, MAO Liping. Study on the Selection of Nursery Substrates for Tomato Plug Seedling[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(11):1878-1881.
[20]	郭世荣. 无土栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
	GUO Shirong. Soilless Culture[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011.

两种香料植物秸秆发酵复配后育苗基质效果评价

Fermention Process of Two Kinds of Spice Plant Waste Stalk and Evaluation on the Effect of Compound Seeling Substrate

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李华静, 王晓东. 酵母菌0939-5产挥发性抑菌物质固态发酵工艺优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1773-1779.
[2]	李佩琪, 孙庆培, 王志慧, 秦新政, 樊永红. 棉秆固体发酵中木质素降解与酶活性变化的关联分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1423-1432.
[3]	杨寒珺, 黄星宇, 王旭哲, 张凤华, 鲁为华, 张凡凡. 田间晾晒时间对饲用油菜发酵品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1433-1441.
[4]	杨梦琪, 南珊珊, 张晓羊, 王海亮, 李佳橙, 牛俊丽, 聂存喜, 张文举. 发酵棉籽粕膳食纤维对黄羽肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能及肠道形态的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1011-1019.
[5]	徐鹏飞, 王旭哲, 杨寒珺, 黄星宇, 付东青, $\boxed{\hbox{鲁为华}}$, 孙新文. 添加糖蜜对棉秆微贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 715-726.
[6]	黄星宇, 孙海荣, 杨寒珺, 张凡凡, $\boxed{\hbox{鲁为华}}$. 添加甜叶菊渣对绢蒿青贮发酵品质及苦味掩盖(去除)的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 742-749.
[7]	王挺, 张凡凡, 黄华, 杨光维, 陈卫国, 张力, 马春晖. 基于模糊相似优先比法评价规模化牧场全株玉米青贮饲料品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 215-225.
[8]	古宁宁, 张蒲, 谢彦如, 唐丹, 赵志信, 董瑞芳, 崔拥民, 秦勇. 基质中化肥施入量对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1929-1934.
[9]	葛慧, 郭增祥, 赵万千, 王惠珍, 王盼, 刘东, 赵鑫, 杜弢. 播期和播种量对当归熟地种苗及成药产量与质量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1537-1544.
[10]	高宇洁, 詹发强, 陈澄, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 王宁, 侯新强, 侯敏, 史应武, 龙宣杞. 黑曲霉拮抗菌Xenorhabdus bovienii445筛选、鉴定及发酵优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1203-1215.
[11]	钟浩杰, 姚新奎, 罗鹏辉, 孟军, 姚岳扬, 王川坤, 任万路. 基于代谢组学分析补喂发酵豆粕对伊犁马驹粪便代谢物的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2800-2807.
[12]	陈雅, 雷静, 廉苇佳, 韩琛, 吴斌, 阿依加马丽·加帕尔. 响应面法优化杏酒发酵工艺[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1519-1528.
[13]	雷静, 陈雅, 廉苇佳, 韩琛, 阿依加马丽·加帕尔, 任红松. 应用响应面法优化桑椹果叶酒发酵工艺[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(6): 1113-1123.
[14]	姚文英, 彭翠兰, 杨海俊, 杜红斌. 不同有机肥用量树叶复混基质对西葫芦的育苗效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 247-253.
[15]	张俊瑜, 郭同军, 桑断疾, 王文奇, 张志军, 王承敏. 饲粮中不同棉秆比例对绵羊瘤胃发酵参数和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 383-392.