基于Box-Behnken响应面法优化杏子干燥工艺

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.11.017

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 2103-2110.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.11.017

• 设施农业·农产品分析检测 • 上一篇下一篇

基于Box-Behnken响应面法优化杏子干燥工艺

王庆惠¹(), 杨嘉鹏²(), 杨忠强¹

1.新疆农业科学院农业机械化研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆工程学院控制工程学院,乌鲁木齐 830022

收稿日期:2020-10-28 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-12-16
通信作者: 杨嘉鹏
作者简介:王庆惠(1980-),女,山东梁山人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农产品加工技术及装备,(E-mail) wangqh1201@126.com
基金资助:
自治区区域协同创新专项(科技援疆计划)(2019E0270);自治区公益性科研院所基本科研业务经费(KY2019027);新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划自然科学项目青年项目(XJEDU2020Y043)

Optimization of Apricot Drying Process Based on Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

WANG Qinghui¹(), YANG Jiapeng²(), YANG Zhongqiang¹

1. Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. School of Control Engineering, Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Urumqi 830022, China

Received:2020-10-28 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-16
Correspondence author: YANG Jiapeng
Supported by:
Regional Collaborative Innovation Project of Xinxiang Uygur Autonomous Region(S & T Supporting Xinjiang Program)(2019E0270);Basic Scientific R & D Program of Public Welfare Research Institutions of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(KY2019027);Youth Project for Natural Science Program in University Scientific Research of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(XJEDU2020Y043)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究提高杏子干制品质与优化干燥工艺,为杏子干燥工艺优化提供依据。【方法】以杏子干制品内酸糖比含量和色泽为评判指标,分别进行不同干燥温度、风速和切分方式条件下单因素干燥试验,分析杏子干燥参数适宜范围,通过Box-Behnken中心组合试验设计,分析响应面优化,确定杏子最优干燥工艺。【结果】随着干燥温度的升高,杏子内糖酸比含量逐渐增加,杏子色泽逐渐变差;随着干燥风速的升高,杏子内糖酸比含量也逐渐增加,但杏子色泽差异不大;与整杏、去核杏相比,切分去核杏内糖酸比含量最高,杏子色泽最好。【结论】杏子最优干燥工艺参数为干燥温度50℃、风速4 m/s,采用切分去核杏的方式,平均综合得分为95.012,与模型预测结果接近,优化结果可靠。

关键词: 杏子; 干燥; 响应面法; 优化; 工艺

Abstract:

【Objective】 To improve the quality of dried apricot, optimize the drying technology and enhance the market competitiveness of dried apricot products. 【Methods】 Taking the content of sugar-acid ratio and color of dried apricot as evaluation indexes, the optimum drying range of apricot was determined by single factor drying tests under different drying temperatures, air velocities and slitting modes. Box-Behnken center combined test design was carried out,and the response surface optimization analysis was performed to determine the drying process of apricot. 【Results】 With the increase of drying temperature, the sugar-acid ratio in apricot increased gradually, and the color of apricot became worse. With the increase of drying air velocities, the sugar-acid ratio in apricot also increased gradually, but the color of apricot was not different. Compared with whole apricot and de-nuclear apricot, the content of sugar-acid ratio of the apricot treated like this was the highest and the color of apricot was the best. 【Conclusion】 The optimum drying parameters of drying apricot were: drying temperature 50℃, air velocity 4 m/s, cut and stones removed. Under this condition, the average comprehensive score was 95.012 which was close to the result predicted by the model and the optimization result was reliable.

Key words: apricot; drying; response surface; optimization; process

中图分类号:

S662.2

王庆惠, 杨嘉鹏, 杨忠强. 基于Box-Behnken响应面法优化杏子干燥工艺[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2103-2110.

WANG Qinghui, YANG Jiapeng, YANG Zhongqiang. Optimization of Apricot Drying Process Based on Box-Behnken Response Surface Method[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2103-2110.

图/表 10

图1 5HRG-14热泵烘干机的结构及工作原理示意注:1控制系统,2热泵主机,3加热管,4干燥室,5温度传感器,6湿度传感器,7风机,8隔板,9料车,10门

Fig.1 Structure and working principle schematic diagram of 5HRG-14 heat pump dryer Note: 1 Control system; 2 Heat pump; 3 Heating pipe; 4 Drying chamber; 5 Temperature sensor; 6 Humidity sensor; 7 Fan; 8 Division; 9 Charging lorry; 10 Door

表1 响应面试验因素水平和编码

Table 1 Factors and coding of response surface test

编码 Coding	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)
-1	0	45	2
0	0.5	50	4
1	1	55	6

图2 不同干燥温度下杏子糖酸比和色泽变化

Fig.2 Influence of air temperatures on sugar-acid ratio and color of apricot

图3 不同干燥风速下杏子糖酸比和色泽变化

Fig.3 Influence of air velocities on sugar-acid ratio and color of apricot

图4 不同切分方式下杏子糖酸比和色泽变化

Fig.4 Influence of slitting mode on sugar-acid ratio and color of apricot

表2 试验设计

Table 2 Test design and results

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95

表3 响应面拟合回归模型方差

Table 3 Variance Analysis of the regression equation model of response surface

方差来源 Soruce of variation	平方和 Quadratic	自由度 Degree of freedom	方差 Variance	F值 F-value	P	显著性 Significance
回归模型 Regression model	1 155.33	9	128.37	137.19	< 0.000 1	^**
A	0.50	1	0.50	0.53	0.488 5
B	21.13	1	21.13	22.58	0.002 1	^**
C	0.13	1	0.13	0.13	0.725 5
AB	4.00	1	4.00	4.27	0.077 5
AC	9.00	1	9.00	9.62	0.017 3	^*
BC	20.25	1	20.25	21.64	0.002 3	^**
A²	219.79	1	219.79	234.89	< 0.000 1	^**
B²	655.27	1	655.27	700.28	< 0.000 1	^**
C²	126.21	1	126.21	134.88	< 0.000 1	^**
残差 Residual	6.55	7	0.94
失拟项 Loss of quasi item	3.75	3	1.25	1.79	0.289 0
纯误差 Pure error	2.80	4	0.70
合计 Total	1161.88	16

图5 切分方式和温度下综合得分

Fig.5 Effect of slitting mode and air temperatures on comprehensive score

图6 切分方式和速度下综合得分

Fig.6 Effect of slitting mode and air velocities on comprehensive score

图7 温度和速度的交互作用下综合得分

Fig.7 Effect of air temperatures and velocities on comprehensive score

参考文献 20

[1]	靳力为, 任广跃, 段续, 等. 超声波协同作用对真空冻干杏脱水及其品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工艺, 2020, 46(6):133-139, 147.
	JIN Liwei, REN Guangyue, DUAN Xu, et al. Effect of ultrasonic synergy on the dehydration and quality of vacuumfreeze-dried apricots[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(6):133-139, 147.
[2]	新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年鉴[J]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019.
	Statistics Beaurao of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Statistical Yearbook of Xinjiang [J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019.
[3]	王庆惠, 李忠新, 买合木江, 等. 新疆杏制干设备现状与发展建议[J]. 农产品加工学刊, 2014,(3):77-79.
	WANG Qinghui, LI Zhongxin, Maihebujiang , et al. Current situation and development proposals of apricot drying equipment in Xinjiang[J]. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2014,(3):77-79.
[4]	肖红伟, 张世湘, 白竣文, 等. 杏子的气体射流冲击干燥特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(7):318-323.
	XIAO Hongwei, ZHANG Shixiang, BAI Junwen, et al. Air impingement drying characteristics of apricot[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(7):318-323.
[5]	王庆惠, 闫圣坤, 李忠新, 等. 干燥工艺对杏干燥特性及色泽变化影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(1):78-84.
	WANG Qinghui, YAN Shengkun, LI Zhongxin, et al. Effect of Drying Processing on Drying Characteristics and Color Changing of Apricot[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(1):78-84.
[6]	王庆惠, 闫圣坤, 李忠新, 等. 高压静电场对杏子热风干燥特性及色泽影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(9):22-27.
	WANG Qinghui, YAN Shengkun, LI Zhongxin, et al. Hot-air drying characteristics and color changing of apricot using high-voltage electric field[J]. Food Machinery, 2016, 32(9):22-27.
[7]	过利敏, 肖波, 孟伊娜, 等. 温度对明星杏干燥动力学及品质影响规律研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(1): 74-81. DOI
	GUO Limin, XIAO Bo, MENG Yina, et al. Study on the Effect of Temperature on Drying Kineticsand Quality of Star Apricot by the Hot Air Drying[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(1):74-81. DOI
[8]	王宁, 刘文秀, 李凤城, 等. 杏低温薄层干燥试验与建模[J]. 农业机械学报, 2011, 42(1):140-143, 153.
	WANG Ning, LIU Wenxiu, LI Fengcheng, et al. Thin layer drying model of apricot at low temperature[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(1):140-143.
[9]	李琼. 干制温度对杏果实糖转化及香气成分的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2017.
	LI Qiong. The Effects of Drying Temperature on Sugar Conversion and Aroma Components of Apricot Fruit[D]. Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017.
[10]	陈雪, 陶永霞, 马钰泰, 等. 不同制干方法对库买提杏香气的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2020, 20(2):186-194.
	CHEN Xue, TAO Yongxia, MA Yutai, et al. Effect of Different Drying Method on the Aroma of Kumaiti Apricot[J]. Storage and Process, 2020, 20(2):186-194.
[11]	王威. 鲜杏干制过程中褐变机理的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2017.
	WANG Wei. Research the mechanisms of browning during dried progress of apricot[D]. Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017.
[12]	AOAC. Official method of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists(No. 934.06), Arlington, 1990.
[13]	Deng Lizhen, Pang Zhongli, Mujumdar A S, et al. High-humidity hot air impingement blanching (HHAIB) enhances drying quality of apricots by inactivating the enzymes, reducing drying time and altering cellular structure[J]. Food Control, 2019, (96):104-111.
[14]	Deng Lizhen, A.S. Mujumdar A. S., Yang Xuhai, et al. High humidity hot air impingement blanching (HHAIB) enhances drying rate and softens texture of apricot via cell wall pectin polysaccharides degradation and ultrastructure modification[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018,(218):292-300.
[15]	GB 5009. 8-2016,食品中果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖、麦芽糖乳糖的测定[S].
	GB 5009. 8-2016. Determination of fructose, glucose, sucrose and maltose lactose in food[S].
[16]	GB/T 12456-2008,食品中总酸的测定[S].
	GB/T 12456-2008. Determination of total acid in foods[S].
[17]	高海生. 果蔬加工过程中褐变及其控制措施的研究进展[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2013, 27(4):1-7.
	GAO Haisheng. Research on browning and inhibition in fruits and vegetables processing[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2013, 27(4):1-7.
[18]	田呈瑞, 张京芳, 陈锦屏, 等. 杏多酚氧化酶动力学研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 1997, 6(3):78-81.
	TIAN Chengrui, ZHANG Jingfang, CHEN Jinping, et al. Studies on Dynamics of Apricot Polyphenoloxidase[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 1997, 6(3):78-81.
[19]	肖红伟. 西洋参片的气体射流冲击干燥特性和色泽变化动力学[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2010.
	XIAO Hongwei. The drying characteristics and color change kinetics of American ginseng slices undergoing air impingement drying[D]. Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2010.
[20]	侯爽爽. 金银花热风干燥过程中颜色劣变机理及抑制研究[D]. 洛阳:河南科技大学, 2011.
	HOU Shuangshuang. Researchon mechanism of honeysuckle color degeneration in hot air drying and the rejection[D]. Luoyang:Henan University of Science and Technology, 2011.

基于Box-Behnken响应面法优化杏子干燥工艺

Optimization of Apricot Drying Process Based on Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95

[1]	王宁, 史应武, 牛新湘, 杨红梅, 楚敏, 詹发强, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 龙宣杞, 丁荣荣. 棉花根际溶磷菌WJP-7发酵培养基优化及防病增产效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1263-1270.
[2]	林青, 秦新政, 高雁, 曾军, 娄恺, 时红玲, 霍向东. 中度嗜盐菌Halomonas salifodinae N35-6产四氢嘧啶的培养基优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3065-3071.
[3]	张伟, 靳范, 李谦绪, 张俊三, 翟修萍, 王善博. 玉米籽粒联合收获机清选装置优化设计与试验[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3102-3112.
[4]	陈凤, 董宇, 蔡宏宇, 张苏江, 雷曼红, 孙禹. 一株盐碱绿藻的SE培养基优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2509-2520.
[5]	赵经华, 杨庭瑞, 张恒, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 马亮, 陈凯丽. 基于响应面法的多砾石砂土滴灌春小麦水肥条件优选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 43-51.
[6]	袁华伟, 魏溢, 赵余, 陶涛, 周敏, 江佳骏, 李莉, 徐洲, 唐江, 娄恺. 豆渣杏鲍菇菌丝曲奇饼干的配方优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2240-2246.
[7]	叶勒生·托合达别克, 涂振东, 李斌斌, 娜迪拉·外力, 陈紫芸, 李学文. 响应面优化甜高粱汁酶解工艺分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1632-1641.
[8]	许铭强, 孟伊娜, 张婷, 马燕, 孟新涛, 邹淑萍, 张谦. 厚皮甜瓜脆片压差膨化干燥工艺[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1429-1437.
[9]	高宇洁, 詹发强, 陈澄, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 王宁, 侯新强, 侯敏, 史应武, 龙宣杞. 黑曲霉拮抗菌Xenorhabdus bovienii445筛选、鉴定及发酵优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1203-1215.
[10]	廉苇佳, 徐彦军, 艾斯坎尔·买提尼牙孜, 唐秋菊, 陈雅, 刘峰娟. 不同促干剂对无核白葡萄干燥速率及感官品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1277-1283.
[11]	马燕, 许铭强, 李喜弟, 孟新涛, 邹淑萍, 张婷, 张谦. 响应面法优化辣椒籽油碱异构化制备共轭亚油酸工艺及其氧化稳定性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 908-915.
[12]	廉苇佳, 陈雅, 韩琛, 李海峰, 刘志刚, 徐桂香, 雷静, 吴久赟. 响应面法优化热泵干燥绿色葡萄干防褐变工艺[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 625-633.
[13]	杨璐, 范少丽, 李宏, 程平, 张志刚. 基于响应面法优化桑葚果酒主发酵工艺及其品质评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 634-644.
[14]	毛吾兰, 祝兆帅, 杨莉玲, 崔宽波, 朱占江. 杏果切分去核机构优化及作业参数分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3084-3092.
[15]	曹林青, 詹发强, 杨蓉, 侯新强, 包慧芳, 侯敏, 王宁, 龙宣杞. 一株拮抗葡萄灰霉病的嗜线虫致病杆菌发酵条件优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2688-2695.

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95

序号 Number	切分方式A Division mode A	温度B Temperature B (℃)	速度C Speed C (m/s)	综合得分 Synthesis score
1	0	0	0	95
2	0	0	0	94
3	0	0	0	94
4	1	0	-1	80
5	0	0	0	93
6	-1	1	0	75
7	0	1	-1	81
8	0	-1	1	76
9	1	-1	0	72
10	1	1	0	77
11	-1	-1	0	74
12	0	1	1	75
13	1	0	1	84
14	-1	0	1	80
15	0	-1	-1	73
16	-1	0	-1	82
17	0	0	0	95