Comparative study on the development of cotton bolls between Gossypium barbadense L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. in Southern Xinjiang

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.001

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 521-530.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.001

• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative study on the development of cotton bolls between Gossypium barbadense L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. in Southern Xinjiang

SHAO Yongjie¹^,²(), ZHAO Yuling¹^,², XIE Zongming³(), HE Liangrong¹()

1. College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
2. Key Laboratory of Genetic Improvement and Efficient Production for Specialty Crops in Arid Southern Xinjiang of XPCC, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
3. Cotton Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Enhancement and Gene Resources Utilization of XPCC,Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China

Received:2024-08-07 Online:2025-03-20 Published:2025-05-14
Correspondence author: XIE Zongming, HE Liangrong
Supported by:
Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of XPCC(NCG202224);National Natural Science Foundation of China " Regulation Mechanism of Heat Stress GhCIPK6 in Cotton"(31550010)

新疆南疆海岛棉与陆地棉棉铃发育比较

邵永杰¹^,²(), 赵玉玲¹^,², 谢宗铭³(), 何良荣¹()

1.塔里木大学农学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.南疆干旱区特色作物遗传改良与高效生产兵团重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300
3.新疆农垦科学院棉花研究所/作物种质创新与基因资源利用兵团重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000

通讯作者: 谢宗铭,何良荣
作者简介:邵永杰(1999-),女,河南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物种质资源,(E-mail) 1932106157@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团农业科技创新工程专项(NCG202224);国家自然科学基金项目“GhCIPK6调控棉花耐热胁迫机理研究”(31550010)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To study and compare the dynamic changes of boll components in the development of cotton bolls and to explore the dynamic development law of Gossypium barbadense L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. in southern Xinjiang in the hope of providing scientific theoretical basis for the management of high-yield and high-quality cultivation and high-yield and high-quality breeding of cotton.【Methods】The bolls of Xinhai No.25 and Xinluzhong No.37 were taken as the research objects, and the external traits of boll development and dry weight of boll components were compared, and besides, logistic fitting was also carried out for comparison. 【Results】External traits: the length, diameter and volume of the bolls reached their maximum values 9, 9 and 15 d later than those of land cotton, and were 15.539 mm, 7.167 mm and 3.4 cm³ less, respectively; the length-to-diameter ratio of island cotton was 0.725 more than that of land cotton; the bolls of island cotton had 3-4 chambers and 20 seeds; the chambers of land cotton had 4-5 chambers and 36 seeds. Boll traits: the dry weight of the boll shells, seeds and fibres of sea island cotton reached its maximum value 12, 9 and 3 d later than that of terrestrial cotton, and 0.419, 0.654 and 1.204 g lighter; the ratio of boll shells∶seeds∶fibres was 29∶46∶25 for sea island cotton, and 24∶43∶33 for terrestrial cotton; the dry matter of each component of the bolls of sea island and terrestrial cotton was fitted with the Logistic equation, and both showed the same dry matter as that of the land. Fitting results were "S" curve, island cotton and land cotton boll fresh boll weight, boll dry weight, volume with boll age change trends were all similar; Island cotton boll length, boll diameter and cotton seed dry weight entered and ended the vigorous growth time 1-4 d later than terrestrial cotton.【Conclusion】The single boll weight, boll chamber and cotton seed number of upland cotton are higher than that of island cotton, the boll period is shorter than that of island cotton, and the proportion of boll shell and cottonseed is lower than that of island cotton, which shows the characteristics of high lint content and significant single boll.

Key words: Gossypium barbadense L.; Gossypium hirsutum L.; boll development; logistic equation

摘要：

【目的】比较研究新疆南疆海岛棉与陆地棉生长发育中棉铃各组分的动态变化,分析海岛棉和陆地棉棉铃的动态发育规律,为棉花高产优质栽培管理及优质育种提供科学的理论依据。【方法】以新海25号和新陆中37号的棉铃为研究对象,对棉铃发育的外部性状、铃部各组分干重进行logistic拟合比较。【结果】外部性状:海岛棉铃长、铃径和体积达到最大值天数分别较陆地棉晚9、9和15 d,并分别减少15.539 mm、7.167 mm和3.4 cm³;海岛棉的长径较陆地棉高0.725。海岛棉铃室为3~4室,棉籽数为20粒;陆地棉为4~5室,棉籽数为36粒。铃部性状:海岛棉棉铃铃壳、棉籽和纤维各干重达到最大值,较陆地棉分别晚12、9和3 d,且分别轻0.419、0.654和1.204 g;铃壳∶棉籽∶纤维比海岛棉为29∶46∶25,陆地棉为24∶43∶33。海岛棉和陆地棉棉铃各组分干物质用Logistic方程拟合结果,均呈“S”型曲线,海岛棉和陆地棉的棉铃鲜铃重、铃壳干重、体积随铃龄变化趋势相似;海岛棉铃长、铃径和棉籽干重进入和结束旺盛生长的时间较陆地棉晚1~4 d。【结论】陆地棉单铃重、铃室和棉籽数等均高于海岛棉,铃期低于海岛棉,铃壳、棉籽所占比重低于海岛棉,表现为衣分高、单铃重的特性。

关键词: 海岛棉, 陆地棉, 棉铃发育, logistic方程

CLC Number:

S562

SHAO Yongjie, ZHAO Yuling, XIE Zongming, HE Liangrong. Comparative study on the development of cotton bolls between Gossypium barbadense L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 521-530.

邵永杰, 赵玉玲, 谢宗铭, 何良荣. 新疆南疆海岛棉与陆地棉棉铃发育比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 521-530.

Figures/Tables 8

References 23

[1]	娄善伟, 陈少毅, 帕尔哈提·买买提, 等. 棉花延迟吐絮收桃增产与机采收桃的可行性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(15): 84-90. DOI
	LOU Shanwei, CHEN Shaoyi, Paerhati Maimaiti, et al. Research on increasing yield and mechanization picking boll by delaying cotton boll opening[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(15): 84-90. DOI
[2]	日孜旺古力·阿不都热合曼. 海岛棉和陆地棉棉铃生长发育规律的比较[J]. 农产品加工(学刊), 2014,(21): 20-24.
	Riziwangguli Abudoureheman. Comparison of the growth and development of sea island cotton and upland cotton boll[J]. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2014,(21): 20-24.
[3]	赵新华, 束红梅, 王友华, 等. 播期对棉铃生物量和氮累积与分配的影响及其与棉铃品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1707-1714. DOI
	ZHAO Xinhua, SHU Hongmei, WANG Youhua, et al. Effects of sowing date on accumulation and distribution of biomass and nitrogen in cotton bolls[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10): 1707-1714. DOI
[4]	朱建军, 张旺锋, 勾玲, 等. 北疆高产棉田棉铃干物质积累规律研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2004, 31(7): 10-12.
	ZHU Jianjun, ZHANG Wangfeng, GOU Ling, et al. Study on dry matter accumulation of cotton bolls in high-yield cotton fields in northern Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2004, 31(7): 10-12.
[5]	曹新川, 胡守林, 韩秀锋, 等. 海岛棉棉铃阶段性发育与产量品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(2): 300-306.
	CAO Xinchuan, HU Shoulin, HAN Xiufeng, et al. Relationship of stage development of cotton bolls with yield and quality in is-land cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(2): 300-306.
[6]	李江峰, 艾合买提·哈里克, 王大光, 等. 棉铃发育不同时期的质量变化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(21): 15-19. DOI
	LI Jiangfeng, Aihemaiti Halike, Wang Daguang et al. Quality change of cotton boll in different development stages[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(21): 15-19. DOI
[7]	刘萍, 宁新柱, 陈红, 等. 高产杂交棉棉铃发育特点的研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2015, 42(10): 24-26. DOI
	LIU Ping, NING Xinzhu, CHEN Hong, et al. Study on bolls development characteristics of hybrid cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2015, 42(10): 24-26. DOI
[8]	毛廷勇, 胡守林, 陈国栋, 等. 新疆南疆阿拉尔垦区主栽陆地棉品种(系)棉铃发育的特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(12): 2157-2168. DOI
	MAO Tingyong, HU Shoulin, CHEN Guodong, et al. Study on boll development of main upland cotton varieties (lines) in alar reclamation area of southern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(12): 2157-2168. DOI
[9]	杨长琴, 刘敬然, 张国伟, 等. 花铃期干旱和渍水对棉铃碳水化合物含量的影响及其与棉铃生物量累积的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8): 2251-2258.
	YANG Changqin, LIU Jingran, ZHANG Guowei, et al. Effects of drought and waterlogging on carbohydrate contents of cotton boll and its relationship with boll biomass accumulation at the flowering and bolling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(8): 2251-2258. PMID
[10]	张煦怡, 田景山, 随龙龙, 等. 新疆棉区脱叶催熟剂喷施时间对棉铃发育的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(6): 15-20, 35. DOI
	ZHANG Xuyi, TIAN Jingshan, SUI Longlong, et al. The impact of defoliation timing on cotton boll development in Xinjiang Region[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(6): 15-20, 35. DOI
[11]	王修山, 陈方海, 张仁林, 等. 铃壳厚薄对棉铃主要性状的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2002, 29(1): 18-20.
	WANG Xiushan, CHEN Fanghai, ZHANG Renlin, et al. Effect of shell thickness on main characters of cotton boll[J]. China Cotton, 2002, 29(1): 18-20.
[12]	由宝昌, 刘键萍, 梅拥军, 等. 海岛棉铃形与铃重纤维品质关系的研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 1993, 2(1): 27-33.
	YOU Baochang, LIU Jianping, MEI Yongjun, et al. A study of the relations between boll form and boll weight and fibre quality of sea-island cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 1993, 2(1): 27-33.
[13]	苏丽丽, 田彦君, 徐新霞, 等. 遮光条件下氮肥用量对棉铃生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, 24(4): 69-75.
	SU Lili, TIAN Yanjun, XU Xinxia, et al. Effect of nitrogen levels on the growth and yield of cotton bolls under shading conditions[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2015, 24(4): 69-75.
[14]	董合忠, 毛树春, 张旺锋, 等. 棉花优化成铃栽培理论及其新发展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(3): 441-451. DOI
	DONG Hezhong, MAO Shuchun, ZHANG Wangfeng, et al. On boll-setting optimization theory for cotton cultivation and its new development[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(3): 441-451.
[15]	陈源, 王永慧, 肖健, 等. 高品质陆地棉棉铃发育特点[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8): 1371-1376.
	CHEN Yuan, WANG Yonghui, XIAO Jian, et al. Boll development characteristics for high-quality upland cotton cultivars[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(8): 1371-1376.
[16]	刘存敬, 江振兴, 师树新, 等. 陆地棉表型性状与主要育种性状的相关性分析[J]. 河北农业科学, 2015, 19(4): 71-76.
	LIU Cunjing, JIANG Zhenxing, SHI Shuxin, et al. Correlation analysis among morphological characters and breeding traits in upland cotton[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 19(4): 71-76.
[17]	李国锋, 何循宏. 陆地棉5室铃比例与品种及栽培条件的相关性初探[J]. 中国棉花, 2001, 28(3): 13-15.
	LI Guofeng, HE Xunhong. Preliminary study on the correlation between the ratio of 5-room bolls and varieties and cultivation conditions of upland cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2001, 28(3): 13-15.
[18]	雷清泉, 刘松涛, 张传伟. 杂交棉棉铃发育特点的研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2005, 32(6): 21-22.
	LEI Qingquan, LIU Songtao, ZHANG Chuanwei. Study on boll development characteristics of hybrid cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2005, 32(6): 21-22.
[19]	窦巧巧, 张玮涛, 陈秀玲, 等. 花铃期水分亏缺对不同部位果枝棉铃发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(7): 1177-1186. DOI
	DOU Qiaoqiao, ZHANG Weitao, CHEN Xiuling, et al. Effects of water deficit in flowering and boll-setting period on boll development and yield in different fruit branches[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(7): 1177-1186. DOI
[20]	狄佳春, 陈旭升, 赵亮. 陆地棉铃壳率与产量、早熟性及纤维品质的关系[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(9): 25-28. DOI
	DI Jiachun, CHEN Xusheng, ZHAO Liang. Relations of boll shell weight with yield, maturity and fibre quality in Gossypium hirsutum L[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(9): 25-28. DOI
[21]	周可金, 裴训武, 江厚旺, 等. 不同开花期棉铃干物质积累规律研究[J]. 棉花学报, 1996, 8(3): 145-150.
	ZHOU Kejin, PEI Xunwu, JIANG Houwang, et al. Studies on the dynamics of dry matter accumulation o cotton boll at different flower stages[J]. Cotton Science, 1996, 8(3): 145-150.
[22]	陈兵林, 曹卫星, 周治国. 棉花单铃干物质积累分配的分期动态模拟及检验[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(3): 487-493.
	CHEN Binglin, CAO Weixing, ZHOU Zhiguo. Simulation and validation of dry matter accumulation and distribution of cotton bolls at different flowering stages[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(3): 487-493.
[23]	刘明, 范君华, 曹娟, 等. 南疆不同类型海岛棉品种棉铃内同化物积累与分配特性的研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2009, 21(3): 218-223. DOI
	LIU Ming, FAN Junhua, CAO Juan, et al. Study on the characteristics of assimilate accumulation and distribution in cotton bolls of different types of island cotton varieties in southern Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Science, 2009, 21(3): 218-223.

铃龄 Days after anthesis (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	铃壳Sheel		棉籽Seed		纤维Fiber
铃龄 Days after anthesis (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	衣分 Lint Percentage (%)
0	0.048	0.044	91.58	0.004	8.42	-	-	-
3	0.053	0.046	86.26	0.007	13.74	-	-	-
6	0.107	0.084	78.55	0.023	21.45	-	-	-
9	0.194	0.137	70.47	0.057	29.53	-	-	-
12	0.466	0.311	66.74	0.113	24.25	0.042	9.01	27.10
15	0.974	0.651	66.84	0.249	25.56	0.074	7.6	22.91
18	1.409	0.813	57.7	0.481	34.14	0.115	8.16	19.30
21	1.621	0.968	59.72	0.549	33.87	0.104	6.42	15.93
24	2.01	1.129	56.17	0.699	34.78	0.182	9.05	20.66
27	2.605	1.213	46.56	1.108	42.53	0.284	10.9	20.40
30	2.878	1.38	47.95	1.159	40.27	0.339	11.78	22.63
33	3.447	1.685	48.88	1.305	37.86	0.457	13.26	25.94
36	3.901	1.737	44.53	1.515	38.84	0.649	16.64	29.99
39	3.780	1.427	37.75	1.561	41.3	0.792	20.95	33.66
42	3.767	1.392	36.95	1.622	43.06	0.753	19.99	31.71
45	4.865	1.642	33.76	2.132	43.82	1.091	22.42	33.85
48	4.468	1.156	25.87	1.96	43.86	1.352	30.27	40.82
51	5.038	1.745	34.64	2.199	43.65	1.093	21.7	33.20
54	5.697	1.543	27.08	2.684	47.11	1.47	25.81	35.39
57	5.675	1.641	28.92	2.792	49.2	1.242	21.88	30.79
60	5.665	1.685	29.74	2.624	46.32	1.356	23.94	34.07
63	6.029	1.711	28.38	2.751	45.62	1.567	26	36.29
66	5.540	1.488	26.86	2.763	49.87	1.290	23.28	31.83

铃龄 Days after anthesis (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	铃壳Sheel		棉籽Seed		纤维Fiber
铃龄 Days after anthesis (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	衣分 Lint Percentage (%)
0	0.048	0.044	91.58	0.004	8.42	-	-	-
3	0.053	0.046	86.26	0.007	13.74	-	-	-
6	0.107	0.084	78.55	0.023	21.45	-	-	-
9	0.194	0.137	70.47	0.057	29.53	-	-	-
12	0.466	0.311	66.74	0.113	24.25	0.042	9.01	27.10
15	0.974	0.651	66.84	0.249	25.56	0.074	7.6	22.91
18	1.409	0.813	57.7	0.481	34.14	0.115	8.16	19.30
21	1.621	0.968	59.72	0.549	33.87	0.104	6.42	15.93
24	2.01	1.129	56.17	0.699	34.78	0.182	9.05	20.66
27	2.605	1.213	46.56	1.108	42.53	0.284	10.9	20.40
30	2.878	1.38	47.95	1.159	40.27	0.339	11.78	22.63
33	3.447	1.685	48.88	1.305	37.86	0.457	13.26	25.94
36	3.901	1.737	44.53	1.515	38.84	0.649	16.64	29.99
39	3.780	1.427	37.75	1.561	41.3	0.792	20.95	33.66
42	3.767	1.392	36.95	1.622	43.06	0.753	19.99	31.71
45	4.865	1.642	33.76	2.132	43.82	1.091	22.42	33.85
48	4.468	1.156	25.87	1.96	43.86	1.352	30.27	40.82
51	5.038	1.745	34.64	2.199	43.65	1.093	21.7	33.20
54	5.697	1.543	27.08	2.684	47.11	1.47	25.81	35.39
57	5.675	1.641	28.92	2.792	49.2	1.242	21.88	30.79
60	5.665	1.685	29.74	2.624	46.32	1.356	23.94	34.07
63	6.029	1.711	28.38	2.751	45.62	1.567	26	36.29
66	5.540	1.488	26.86	2.763	49.87	1.290	23.28	31.83

铃龄 Boll age (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	铃壳Sheel		棉籽Seed		纤维Fiber
铃龄 Boll age (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	衣分 Lint Percentage (%)
0	0.047 25	0.045 00	95.24	0.002 25	4.76	-	-
3	0.047 90	0.040 50	84.55	0.007 40	15.45	-	-
6	0.217 52	0.162 52	74.72	0.055 00	25.28	-	-
9	0.590 00	0.403 60	68.41	0.114 80	19.46	0.071 6	12.14	38.41
12	0.947 00	0.577 00	60.93	0.239 00	25.24	0.131 0	13.83	35.41
15	2.003 00	1.164 00	58.11	0.596 60	29.79	0.242 4	12.10	28.89
18	2.996 00	1.547 00	51.64	1.105 00	36.88	0.344 0	11.48	23.74
21	3.161 60	1.501 40	47.49	1.235 80	39.09	0.424 4	13.42	25.56
24	3.670 00	1.645 20	44.83	1.468 20	40.01	0.556 6	15.17	27.49
27	3.909 40	1.776 40	45.44	1.599 00	40.90	0.534 0	13.66	25.04
30	4.486 60	1.821 00	40.59	1.746 00	38.92	0.919 6	20.50	34.50
33	4.451 60	1.747 40	39.25	1.740 20	39.09	0.964 0	21.66	35.65
36	5.464 80	1.935 80	35.42	2.118 00	38.76	1.411 0	25.82	39.98
39	6.474 80	2.164 60	33.43	2.577 60	39.81	1.732 6	26.76	40.20
42	6.508 00	2.058 80	31.63	2.548 80	39.16	1.900 4	29.20	42.71
45	6.981 00	1.999 00	28.63	2.972 50	42.58	2.009 5	28.79	40.34
48	7.764 40	2.110 00	27.18	3.446 00	44.38	2.208 4	28.44	39.06
51	8.226 00	1.988 40	24.17	3.564 00	43.33	2.673 6	32.50	42.86
54	8.370 80	1.904 20	22.75	3.487 40	41.66	2.979 2	35.59	46.07
57	8.623 80	2.002 40	23.22	3.643 20	42.25	2.978 2	34.53	44.98

铃龄 Boll age (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	铃壳Sheel		棉籽Seed		纤维Fiber
铃龄 Boll age (d)	单铃干重 Boll weight (g)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	重量 Weight (g)	比率 Ratio (%)	衣分 Lint Percentage (%)
0	0.047 25	0.045 00	95.24	0.002 25	4.76	-	-
3	0.047 90	0.040 50	84.55	0.007 40	15.45	-	-
6	0.217 52	0.162 52	74.72	0.055 00	25.28	-	-
9	0.590 00	0.403 60	68.41	0.114 80	19.46	0.071 6	12.14	38.41
12	0.947 00	0.577 00	60.93	0.239 00	25.24	0.131 0	13.83	35.41
15	2.003 00	1.164 00	58.11	0.596 60	29.79	0.242 4	12.10	28.89
18	2.996 00	1.547 00	51.64	1.105 00	36.88	0.344 0	11.48	23.74
21	3.161 60	1.501 40	47.49	1.235 80	39.09	0.424 4	13.42	25.56
24	3.670 00	1.645 20	44.83	1.468 20	40.01	0.556 6	15.17	27.49
27	3.909 40	1.776 40	45.44	1.599 00	40.90	0.534 0	13.66	25.04
30	4.486 60	1.821 00	40.59	1.746 00	38.92	0.919 6	20.50	34.50
33	4.451 60	1.747 40	39.25	1.740 20	39.09	0.964 0	21.66	35.65
36	5.464 80	1.935 80	35.42	2.118 00	38.76	1.411 0	25.82	39.98
39	6.474 80	2.164 60	33.43	2.577 60	39.81	1.732 6	26.76	40.20
42	6.508 00	2.058 80	31.63	2.548 80	39.16	1.900 4	29.20	42.71
45	6.981 00	1.999 00	28.63	2.972 50	42.58	2.009 5	28.79	40.34
48	7.764 40	2.110 00	27.18	3.446 00	44.38	2.208 4	28.44	39.06
51	8.226 00	1.988 40	24.17	3.564 00	43.33	2.673 6	32.50	42.86
54	8.370 80	1.904 20	22.75	3.487 40	41.66	2.979 2	35.59	46.07
57	8.623 80	2.002 40	23.22	3.643 20	42.25	2.978 2	34.53	44.98

		W_m/d	a	b	t₀/d	V_m/(g/d)	t₁/d	t₂/d	Δ_t/d	方程Equation	R²
海岛棉 Gossypium barbadense	棉铃鲜重	20.56	3.51	-0.19	18.77	0.96	11.73	25.81	14.08	y =20.56 / (1+3.51 e^-0^.¹⁸⁷^X)	0.984 0
	铃壳干重	1.61	3.56	-0.19	18.73	0.08	11.80	25.66	13.86	y =1.61 / (1+3.559 e^-0^.¹⁹^X)	0.971 9
	棉籽干重	2.97	3.44	-0.09	36.66	0.07	22.62	50.70	28.08	y =2.97 / (1+3.439 e^-0^.⁰⁹⁴^X)	0.981 7
	纤维干重	1.44	5.49	-0.15	37.88	0.05	28.79	46.96	18.17	y =1.44 / (1+5.492 e^-0^.¹⁴⁵^X)	0.975 6
	铃长	56.43	1.96	-0.18	11.05	2.50	3.62	18.48	14.86	y =56.43 / (1+1.958 e^-0^.¹⁷⁷^X)	0.983 6
	铃径	29.79	1.54	-0.16	9.41	1.22	1.37	17.45	16.08	y =29.79 / (1+1.54 e^-0^.¹⁶^X)	0.991 3
	体积	21.45	3.47	-0.18	19.19	0.97	11.91	26.46	14.55	y =21.45 / (1+3.473 e^-0^.¹⁸¹^X)	0.979 8
陆地棉 Gossypium hirsutum	棉铃鲜重	30.25	4.10	-0.28	14.72	2.11	9.99	19.45	9.46	y =30.25 / (1+4.10 e^-0^.²⁷⁹^X)	0.986 5
	铃壳干重	1.97	3.47	-0.24	14.62	0.12	9.07	20.18	11.11	y =1.97 / (1+3.47 e^-0^.²³⁷^X)	0.977 3
	棉籽干重	4.04	3.14	-0.09	33.29	0.10	19.31	47.27	27.96	y =4.04 / (1+3.14 e^-0^.⁰⁹⁴^X)	0.975 2
	纤维干重	3.68	4.21	-0.10	41.83	0.09	28.74	54.92	26.18	y =3.68 / (1+4.21 e^-0^.¹⁰¹^X)	0.990 9
	铃长	45.69	1.57	-0.2	7.91	2.26	1.26	14.56	13.30	y =45.69 / (1+1.57 e^-0^.¹⁹⁸^X)	0.992 1
	铃径	36.66	1.51	-0.20	7.42	1.86	0.95	13.90	12.95	y =36.66 / (1+1.51 e ^-0^.²⁰³^X)	0.981 3
	体积	25.28	5.54	-0.41	13.35	2.62	10.18	16.53	6.35	y =25.28 / (1+5.54 e ^-0^.⁴¹⁵^X)	0.985 9

Comparative study on the development of cotton bolls between Gossypium barbadense L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. in Southern Xinjiang

新疆南疆海岛棉与陆地棉棉铃发育比较

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[2]	GONG Junming, XIONG Xianpeng, ZHANG Caixia, SHAO Dongnan, CHENG Shuaishuai, SUN Jie. Functional analysis of 4-coumarate: CoA ligase gene Gh4CL30 in upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1301-1309.
[3]	WANG Kaidi, GAO Chenxu, PEI Wenfeng, YANG Shuxian, ZHANG Wenqing, SONG Jikun, MA Jianjiang, WANG Li, YU Jiwen, CHEN Quanjia. Identification of TRM gene family and fiber quality related excellent haplotype analysis in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 521-536.
[4]	MAO Tingyong, LIU Chan, YANG Beifang, LI Yabing, ZHOU Yun, WANG Dong, CHEN Guodong, WAN Sumei. Response characteristics of source and sink organs of drip irrigation cotton to chemical topping [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 288-299.
[5]	HUANG Xinglei, WANG Weiran, WANG Meng, ZHU Jiahui, LIN Feng, QIN Guoli, YANG Jing, Alifu Aierxi, WU Quanzhong, KONG Jie. Diversity evaluation of machine-picked agronomic traits in Gossypium barbadense L. germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 1-8.
[6]	GENG Feifei, MENG Chaomin, QING Guixia, ZHOU Jiamin, ZHANG Fuhou, LIU Fengju. Cloning and expression analysis of phosphorus efficient gene GhMYB4 in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1406-1412.
[7]	WEN Jia, HUANG Chenjue, JI Zihan, LI Libei, FENG Zhen, YU Shuxun. Association analysis of dynamic plant height trait using SSR marker in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2892-2901.
[8]	DOU Qiaoqiao, ZHANG Weitao, CHEN Xiuling, HE Qingyu, DAI Jianmin, DUAN Songjiang, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of Water Deficit in Flowering and Boll-setting Period on Boll Development and Yield in Different Fruit Branches [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(7): 1177-1186.
[9]	Omarjan Kurban, Nusrat Osiman, Arman Ablimet, LI Jie, ZHANG Pengzhong, Tursunjan Mamat. Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis of Main Characters of Different Cotton Cultivars in Oasis Arid Area in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(4): 643-652.
[10]	MIN Kaili, CHAO Xiangbao, TENG Lu, CAI Yongsheng, LEI Huichen, YAN Zhongjian, ZHENG Kai, CHEN Quanjia. Cloning and Expression Analysis of GbHCT10 Gene of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(2): 206-215.
[11]	JIN Yinan, DONG Helin, LI Pengcheng, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, XU Wenxiu, ZHENG Cangsong. Effects of soil potassium level on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of early cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2236-2243.
[12]	ZHANG Yan, YAO Yinkun, HU We, GAO Yuan, TANG Mingyao. Effects of Phosphate Fertilizer Application on P Accumulation, Distribution,Utilization and Yield of Cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 2004-2011.
[13]	MAO Ting-yong, HU Shou-lin, CHEN Guo-dong, LI Ya-bing, ZHANG Wei, XU Wen-xiu, ZHANG Yong, CHEN Jia-lin, WAN Su-mei. Study on Boll Development of Main Upland Cotton Varieties (Lines) in Alar Reclamation Area of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(12): 2157-2168.
[14]	LI Jian-feng , FAN Zhe-ru , ZHANG Yue-qiang , WANG Zhong , GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hong-zhi , ZHAO Qi. Studies on Grain Filling Dynamics of Spring Wheat in Xinjiang by Logistic Equation Fitting [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2006-2014.
[15]	WANG Long, LI Li-bei, MA Qi-feng, GENG Hong-wei, CHEN Quan-jia, QU Yan-ying, FAN Shu-li. Association Analysis of Verticillum Wilt Resistance Trait Using SSR Marker in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(9): 1569-1578.