Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 161-170.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.018
• Horticultural Special Local Products • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Shuai1(), CHENG Ping2(
), ZHANG Qiwu3, WANG Kai2, WU Shengli1, LI Hong4
Received:
2022-05-11
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-03-07
Correspondence author:
CHENG Ping (1985-), male, native place: Huaining, Anhui. Associate researcher, master, research field: Breeding of new peach varieties, (E-mail)84966324@qq.com
Supported by:
张帅1(), 程平2(
), 张齐武3, 王凯2, 武胜利1, 李宏4
通讯作者:
程平(1985-),男,安徽怀宁人,副研究员,硕士生导师,研究方向为森林培育,(E-mail)84966324@qq.com
作者简介:
张帅(1996-),男,重庆万州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林培育,(E-mail)zszs913@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Shuai, CHENG Ping, ZHANG Qiwu, WANG Kai, WU Shengli, LI Hong. Research on Water Harvesting and Afforestation Technology of Rosa laxaon the Front Mountain belt of the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 161-170.
张帅, 程平, 张齐武, 王凯, 武胜利, 李宏. 天山北坡前山带疏花蔷薇集水造林技术措施筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 161-170.
整地方式 Land preparation method | 处理 Treatment | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | 新梢生长量 Young shoot growth (cm) | 新梢径粗 Shoot diameter (cm) | 地上部分鲜重 Fresh weight of overground part(g) | 地上部分干重 Dry weight of overground part(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 81.67±2.80bc | 45.32±7.55c | 7.71±1.09cde | 145.95±8.15d | 78.52±3.31e |
B | 75.00±4.10d | 31.67±3.51ef | 6.43±0.51cdefg | 126.82±7.3fg | 72.51±2.21hi | |
C | 68.33±3.20de | 30.21±3.11efg | 6.02±1.64defg | 83.67±5.08h | 46.28±2.55j | |
A+B | 95.00±1.30a | 58.34±3.23b | 8.12±0.95bcd | 199.43±6.95b | 114.81±8.04b | |
A+B | 93.33±1.82a | 59.67±4.51b | 8.38±1.33bc | 175.33±5.52c | 105.11±5.19c | |
B+C | 73.33±2.25d | 42.83±3.25c | 7.81±1.3cde | 134.68±6.05ef | 74.43±5.68g | |
A+B+C | 98.33±3.25a | 81.83±3.55a | 11.22±1.72a | 233.36±9.69a | 131.54±8.56a | |
CK | 66.67±2.05f | 27.17±2.36fg | 5.02±0.88fg | 50.29±2.85i | 27.21±1.08k | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 76.67±3.90cd | 40.5±3.12cd | 7.12±1.44cdef | 136.25±5.43e | 76.24±5.88f |
B | 68.33±3.60de | 26.67±3.51fg | 5.73±0.42efg | 120.33±3.05g | 71.31±5.02i | |
C | 66.67±4.35f | 26.2±3.21fg | 5.34±0.81fg | 81.19±3.02h | 46.15±2.91j | |
A+B | 86.67±2.71b | 59.13±3.61b | 8.31±0.98bc | 193.09±11.28b | 111.69±9.25b | |
A+B | 85.00±4.40b | 56.5±3.28b | 8.02±1.91bcd | 169.32±8.31c | 90.5±8.75d | |
B+C | 71.67±1.85de | 35.33±4.73de | 6.6±1.74cdefg | 129.77±4.66ef | 73.57±3.27gh | |
A+B+C | 96.67±2.83a | 77.07±3.72a | 10.02±1.02ab | 228.77±12.89a | 129.22±8.83a | |
CK | 50.00±1.40g | 24.33±3.21g | 4.66±1.44g | 47.89±2.17i | 26.88±1.67k |
Table1 Survival rate and growth of R. laxa under different afforestation techniques
整地方式 Land preparation method | 处理 Treatment | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | 新梢生长量 Young shoot growth (cm) | 新梢径粗 Shoot diameter (cm) | 地上部分鲜重 Fresh weight of overground part(g) | 地上部分干重 Dry weight of overground part(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 81.67±2.80bc | 45.32±7.55c | 7.71±1.09cde | 145.95±8.15d | 78.52±3.31e |
B | 75.00±4.10d | 31.67±3.51ef | 6.43±0.51cdefg | 126.82±7.3fg | 72.51±2.21hi | |
C | 68.33±3.20de | 30.21±3.11efg | 6.02±1.64defg | 83.67±5.08h | 46.28±2.55j | |
A+B | 95.00±1.30a | 58.34±3.23b | 8.12±0.95bcd | 199.43±6.95b | 114.81±8.04b | |
A+B | 93.33±1.82a | 59.67±4.51b | 8.38±1.33bc | 175.33±5.52c | 105.11±5.19c | |
B+C | 73.33±2.25d | 42.83±3.25c | 7.81±1.3cde | 134.68±6.05ef | 74.43±5.68g | |
A+B+C | 98.33±3.25a | 81.83±3.55a | 11.22±1.72a | 233.36±9.69a | 131.54±8.56a | |
CK | 66.67±2.05f | 27.17±2.36fg | 5.02±0.88fg | 50.29±2.85i | 27.21±1.08k | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 76.67±3.90cd | 40.5±3.12cd | 7.12±1.44cdef | 136.25±5.43e | 76.24±5.88f |
B | 68.33±3.60de | 26.67±3.51fg | 5.73±0.42efg | 120.33±3.05g | 71.31±5.02i | |
C | 66.67±4.35f | 26.2±3.21fg | 5.34±0.81fg | 81.19±3.02h | 46.15±2.91j | |
A+B | 86.67±2.71b | 59.13±3.61b | 8.31±0.98bc | 193.09±11.28b | 111.69±9.25b | |
A+B | 85.00±4.40b | 56.5±3.28b | 8.02±1.91bcd | 169.32±8.31c | 90.5±8.75d | |
B+C | 71.67±1.85de | 35.33±4.73de | 6.6±1.74cdefg | 129.77±4.66ef | 73.57±3.27gh | |
A+B+C | 96.67±2.83a | 77.07±3.72a | 10.02±1.02ab | 228.77±12.89a | 129.22±8.83a | |
CK | 50.00±1.40g | 24.33±3.21g | 4.66±1.44g | 47.89±2.17i | 26.88±1.67k |
整地方式 Landpreparati onmethod | 处理 Treatment | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll (mg/g) | 可溶性蛋白 SolubleProtein (mg/g) | 丙二醛 Malondialdehyde (nmol/g) | 脯氨酸 Proline (μg/g) | 过氧化物酶 Peroxidase [U/(g·min)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 1.97±0.08de | 15.84±1.12efg | 13.84±0.52fg | 73.82±2.41de | 174.33±4.04fg |
B | 1.76±0.11efg | 22.23±0.86ab | 17.16±1.66de | 88.77±2.49c | 223.29±3.61bc | |
C | 1.62±0.06fgh | 19.79±1.09cd | 24.17±2.46c | 106.3±2.04b | 205.67±5.69d | |
A+B | 2.54±0.21ab | 13.18±0.92h | 8.37±1.24ij | 47.33±5.4g | 145.43±8.89i | |
A+C | 2.02±0.17de | 17.12±1.58defg | 13.16±1.02g | 67.91±2.51e | 156.33±5.69h | |
B+C | 2.23±0.21cd | 15.49±1.01fg | 11.97±0.69gh | 80.98±4.08d | 176.67±4.16f | |
A+B+C | 2.66±0.11a | 15.31±1.12g | 7.12±0.83j | 25.17±4.03h | 125.33±5.51j | |
CK | 1.34±0.32i | 23.62±0.59ab | 29.21±1.19a | 119.56±2.03a | 247.56±10.15a | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 1.85±0.1ef | 12.96±1.37h | 14.23±1.13fg | 53.71±1.55fg | 214.33±4.04cd |
B | 1.23±0.15i | 25.04±1.92a | 25.97±1.37bc | 93.84±4.29c | 194.56±4.32e | |
C | 1.49±0.17ghi | 21.62±0.71bc | 18.38±1.29d | 111.59±1.09b | 229.67±4.51b | |
A+B | 2.31±0.39bc | 17.76±1.85def | 10.41±0.8hi | 58.84±4.46f | 123.67±5.13j | |
A+C | 2.19±0.46cd | 16.61±1.33efg | 12.31±0.98gh | 49.37±2.8g | 164.67±3.06gh | |
B+C | 1.95±0.26e | 18.07±1.32de | 15.66±1.07ef | 104.28±3.83b | 184.33±5.51ef | |
A+B+C | 2.57±0.33ab | 11.9±1.49h | 8.98±1.38ij | 32.12±1.02h | 113.52±11.14k | |
CK | 1.44±0.08hi | 23.65±1.04ab | 27.59±1.57ab | 126.03±2a | 255.85±4.36a |
Table 2 Physiological indices of R. laxa under different silviculture techniques
整地方式 Landpreparati onmethod | 处理 Treatment | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll (mg/g) | 可溶性蛋白 SolubleProtein (mg/g) | 丙二醛 Malondialdehyde (nmol/g) | 脯氨酸 Proline (μg/g) | 过氧化物酶 Peroxidase [U/(g·min)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 1.97±0.08de | 15.84±1.12efg | 13.84±0.52fg | 73.82±2.41de | 174.33±4.04fg |
B | 1.76±0.11efg | 22.23±0.86ab | 17.16±1.66de | 88.77±2.49c | 223.29±3.61bc | |
C | 1.62±0.06fgh | 19.79±1.09cd | 24.17±2.46c | 106.3±2.04b | 205.67±5.69d | |
A+B | 2.54±0.21ab | 13.18±0.92h | 8.37±1.24ij | 47.33±5.4g | 145.43±8.89i | |
A+C | 2.02±0.17de | 17.12±1.58defg | 13.16±1.02g | 67.91±2.51e | 156.33±5.69h | |
B+C | 2.23±0.21cd | 15.49±1.01fg | 11.97±0.69gh | 80.98±4.08d | 176.67±4.16f | |
A+B+C | 2.66±0.11a | 15.31±1.12g | 7.12±0.83j | 25.17±4.03h | 125.33±5.51j | |
CK | 1.34±0.32i | 23.62±0.59ab | 29.21±1.19a | 119.56±2.03a | 247.56±10.15a | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 1.85±0.1ef | 12.96±1.37h | 14.23±1.13fg | 53.71±1.55fg | 214.33±4.04cd |
B | 1.23±0.15i | 25.04±1.92a | 25.97±1.37bc | 93.84±4.29c | 194.56±4.32e | |
C | 1.49±0.17ghi | 21.62±0.71bc | 18.38±1.29d | 111.59±1.09b | 229.67±4.51b | |
A+B | 2.31±0.39bc | 17.76±1.85def | 10.41±0.8hi | 58.84±4.46f | 123.67±5.13j | |
A+C | 2.19±0.46cd | 16.61±1.33efg | 12.31±0.98gh | 49.37±2.8g | 164.67±3.06gh | |
B+C | 1.95±0.26e | 18.07±1.32de | 15.66±1.07ef | 104.28±3.83b | 184.33±5.51ef | |
A+B+C | 2.57±0.33ab | 11.9±1.49h | 8.98±1.38ij | 32.12±1.02h | 113.52±11.14k | |
CK | 1.44±0.08hi | 23.65±1.04ab | 27.59±1.57ab | 126.03±2a | 255.85±4.36a |
整地方式 Landpreparation method | 处理 Treatment | 净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate [μmol/(m2·s)] | 气孔导度Gs Stomatal conductance [mol/(m2·s)] | 胞间CO2浓度Ci Intercellular CO2 concentration (μmol/mol) | 蒸腾速率Tr Tyanspiration rate [mmol/(m2·s)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 10.85±0.7e | 0.161±0.015ef | 209.18±1.97gh | 2.65±0.09e |
B | 9.64±0.57f | 0.189±0.025c | 223.83±2.88f | 2.19±0.07fg | |
C | 7.47±0.34g | 0.165±0.016cd | 213.81±4.50g | 2.05±0.11gh | |
A+B | 12.42±0.42cd | 0.287±0.014a | 263.66±2.69c | 3.17±0.09d | |
A+C | 13.03±0.41bc | 0.192±0.025c | 249.15±1.4d | 2.37±0.31f | |
B+C | 12.44±0.65cd | 0.221±0.012b | 238.4±7.77e | 1.83±0.06ij | |
A+B+C | 13.34±0.7ab | 0.271±0.011a | 296.89±1.63a | 4.17±0.05a | |
CK | 9.33±0.17f | 0.112±0.011i | 186.78±7.82i | 1.61±0.05k | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 12.67±0.29bcd | 0.183±0.013cd | 205.64±2.18h | 3.41±0.04c |
B | 9.13±0.15f | 0.139±0.028gh | 187.78±1.87i | 2.08±0.14gh | |
C | 10.49±0.33e | 0.144±0.015fg | 249.48±4.68d | 1.74±0.07jk | |
A+B | 13.37±0.17ab | 0.182±0.010cd | 275.61±3.87b | 3.2±0.13d | |
A+C | 10.91±0.57e | 0.176±0.016cde | 259.15±1.74c | 3.45±0.11c | |
B+C | 11.92±0.36d | 0.125±0.021hi | 226.83±3.45f | 1.95±0.06hi | |
A+B+C | 13.89±0.23a | 0.230±0.028b | 274.48±3.74b | 3.89±0.05b | |
CK | 8.18±0.2g | 0.091±0.016j | 168.33±2.52j | 1.58±0.03k |
Table 3 Photosynthetic indices of R. laxa under different silviculture techniques
整地方式 Landpreparation method | 处理 Treatment | 净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate [μmol/(m2·s)] | 气孔导度Gs Stomatal conductance [mol/(m2·s)] | 胞间CO2浓度Ci Intercellular CO2 concentration (μmol/mol) | 蒸腾速率Tr Tyanspiration rate [mmol/(m2·s)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 10.85±0.7e | 0.161±0.015ef | 209.18±1.97gh | 2.65±0.09e |
B | 9.64±0.57f | 0.189±0.025c | 223.83±2.88f | 2.19±0.07fg | |
C | 7.47±0.34g | 0.165±0.016cd | 213.81±4.50g | 2.05±0.11gh | |
A+B | 12.42±0.42cd | 0.287±0.014a | 263.66±2.69c | 3.17±0.09d | |
A+C | 13.03±0.41bc | 0.192±0.025c | 249.15±1.4d | 2.37±0.31f | |
B+C | 12.44±0.65cd | 0.221±0.012b | 238.4±7.77e | 1.83±0.06ij | |
A+B+C | 13.34±0.7ab | 0.271±0.011a | 296.89±1.63a | 4.17±0.05a | |
CK | 9.33±0.17f | 0.112±0.011i | 186.78±7.82i | 1.61±0.05k | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 12.67±0.29bcd | 0.183±0.013cd | 205.64±2.18h | 3.41±0.04c |
B | 9.13±0.15f | 0.139±0.028gh | 187.78±1.87i | 2.08±0.14gh | |
C | 10.49±0.33e | 0.144±0.015fg | 249.48±4.68d | 1.74±0.07jk | |
A+B | 13.37±0.17ab | 0.182±0.010cd | 275.61±3.87b | 3.2±0.13d | |
A+C | 10.91±0.57e | 0.176±0.016cde | 259.15±1.74c | 3.45±0.11c | |
B+C | 11.92±0.36d | 0.125±0.021hi | 226.83±3.45f | 1.95±0.06hi | |
A+B+C | 13.89±0.23a | 0.230±0.028b | 274.48±3.74b | 3.89±0.05b | |
CK | 8.18±0.2g | 0.091±0.016j | 168.33±2.52j | 1.58±0.03k |
整地方式 Landpreparation method | 处理 Treatment | 各指标隶属度值 Affiliation value of each indicator | 均值 Average value | 排序 Sorting | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | Z4 | Z5 | ||||
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 8 |
B | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 11 | |
C | 0 | 0.17 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 14 | |
A+B | 0.77 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 3 | |
A+C | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.7 | 0.71 | 5 | |
B+C | 0.77 | 0.5 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 9 | |
A+B+C | 0.91 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.98 | 1 | |
CK | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 15 | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.28 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 7 |
B | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 12 | |
C | 0.47 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 13 | |
A+B | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.6 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 4 | |
A+C | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 6 | |
B+C | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 10 | |
A+B+C | 1 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.8 | 0.91 | 2 | |
CK | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 16 |
Table 4 Comprehensive evaluation of different silviculture techniques and measures for R. laxa
整地方式 Landpreparation method | 处理 Treatment | 各指标隶属度值 Affiliation value of each indicator | 均值 Average value | 排序 Sorting | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | Z4 | Z5 | ||||
水平沟 Horizontal ditch | A | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 8 |
B | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 11 | |
C | 0 | 0.17 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 14 | |
A+B | 0.77 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 3 | |
A+C | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.7 | 0.71 | 5 | |
B+C | 0.77 | 0.5 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 9 | |
A+B+C | 0.91 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.98 | 1 | |
CK | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 15 | |
V形坑 V-shaped pit | A | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.28 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 7 |
B | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 12 | |
C | 0.47 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 13 | |
A+B | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.6 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 4 | |
A+C | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 6 | |
B+C | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 10 | |
A+B+C | 1 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.8 | 0.91 | 2 | |
CK | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 16 |
[1] | 程维明, 周成虎, 汤奇成, 等. 天山北坡前山带景观分布特征的遥感研究[J]. 地理学报, 2001,(5): 540-547. |
CHENG Weiming, ZHOU Chenghu, TANG Qicheng, et al. RS Research of Landscape Distribution Characteristics of Northern Piedmont, Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, (5): 540-547. | |
[2] | 刘超, 闫小月, 姜逢清. 天山北坡前山带降水分布型对荒漠植被的影响——基于逐日降水数据和NDVI分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21):7790-7804. |
LIU Chao, YAN Xiaoyue, JIANG Feng qing. Influence of precipitation distribution on desert vegetation of Northern Piedmont,Tianshan Mountains: analysis based on daily NDVI and precipitation data[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 7790-7804. | |
[3] | 田浩, 刘琳, 张正勇, 等. 天山北坡经济带关键性生态空间评[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(1):401-414. |
TIAN Hao, LIU Lin, ZHANG Zhengyong, et al. Evaluation on the critical ecological space of the economic belt of Tianshan northslope[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 401-414. | |
[4] | 吴淑芳, 冯浩, 吴普特. 干旱半干旱地区径流林业研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,(4):150-154. |
WU Shufang, FENG Hao, WU Pute. Progress and prospect of runoff forestry in arid and semiarid regions[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, (4): 150-154. | |
[5] | 陈晓光, 于寒青, 刘文祥, 等. 基于MDC方法评价林下劣地碳氮提升对短期恢复措施的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4):280-287. |
CHEN Xiaoguang, YU Hanqing, LIU Wenxiang, et al. Assessment of the Response of Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Enhancement in Erosion-Degraded Land to Short-Term Restoration Measures Based On Minimum Detectable Change Method[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(4): 280-287. | |
[6] | 赵艳云, 程积民, 王延平, 等. 半干旱区环境因子对柠条灌木林结构的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005,(3):10-14. |
ZHAO Yanyun, CHENG Jimin, WANG Yanping, et al. Influence of Environmental Factors on Formation of Morphological Structure of Caragana Korshiskii. In Semi-arid Region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, (3): 10-14. | |
[7] | 朱聿申, 陈宇轩, 查同刚, 等. 大鱼鳞坑双苗造林技术在黄土沟壑区的应用效果[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(3):560-568. |
ZHU Yushen, CHEN Yuxuan, ZHA Tonggang, et al. Application of Double-seedling Afforestation Technique in Big Fish-scale Pits in the Loess Gully Area[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(3): 560-568. | |
[8] | 吴贤忠, 李毅, 高志永, 等. 白膜、黑膜全年覆盖下的土壤水、热、盐变化[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(11):1701-1709. |
WU Xianzhong, LI Yi, GAO Zhiyong, et al. Variations in soil moisture, heat and salt under year round mulching of white and black film[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(11): 1701-1709. | |
[9] | 王正安, 余治家, 马杰, 等. 不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(5):226-231,237. |
WANG Zhengan, YU Zhijia, MA Jie, et al. Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 226-231,237. | |
[10] | MI J Z, LIU J H, XU S T. Effects of Sandy Soil Amendment on Soil Moisture and Growth Status of Millet with Rainfed Sandy Soil in a Semi-Arid Region[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 3848:1092-1093. |
[11] |
Bandiera M, Mosca G, Vamerali T. Humic acids affect root characteristics of fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers.) in metal-polluted wastes[J]. Desalination, 2009, 246(1-3): 78-91.
DOI URL |
[12] | 汤东, 程平, 杨建军, 等. 天山北坡山前植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6):1683-1694. |
TANG Dong, CHENG Ping, YANG Jianjun, et al. Physiological responses of plants to drought stress in the Northern Piedmont, Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1683-1694. | |
[13] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001:134-170. |
LI Hesheng. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001: 134-170. | |
[14] | Rao M V, Paliyath G, Ormrod D P. Ultraviolet-B- and ozone-induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant physiology, 1996, 110(1). |
[15] | 李娟, 雷霞, 王小利, 等. 干旱胁迫对高羊茅航天诱变新品系生理特性的影响及综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(10):87-98. |
LI Juan, LEI Xia, WANG Xiaoli, et al. Effects of drought stress on the physiological characteristics of new lines of Festuca arundinacea induced by spaceflight and their comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(10): 87-98. | |
[16] | 陈峰, 肖斌, 张柏玉. 安息香属3个树种苗木光合特性与生长性状比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(4):137-139. |
CHEN Feng, XIAO Bin, ZHANG Baiyu. Comparison of Photosynthesis Characteristics and Growth Character for Three Tree Species Seedlings of Styrax[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(4): 137-139. | |
[17] | 董蕾, 陈博, 李吉跃, 等. 5个楸树无性系抗旱性的综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(4):30-35. |
DONG Lei, CHEN Bo, LI Jiyue, et al. Drought resistance evaluation of 5 Catalpa bungei clones[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(4): 30-35. | |
[18] | 杨淑红, 朱镝, 任媛媛, 等. 干旱胁迫下3个杨树品种叶片膜透性及部分渗透调节物质的变化[J]. 上海农业学报, 2016, 32(6):118-123. |
YANG Shuhong, ZHU Di, REN Yuanyuan, et al. Change of leaf membrane permeability and some osmotic regulation substances of 3 poplar varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2016, 32(6): 118-123. | |
[19] | 李英武, 柳晔, 海钦. 宁南山区抗旱集流整地及树种配置技术[J]. 林业实用技术, 2008,(5):23-24. |
LI Yingwu, LIU Ye, HAI Qin. Drought-resistant land preparation and tree species allocation techniques in the mountainous areas of Ningnan[J]. Practical Forestry Technology, 2008, (5): 23-24 | |
[20] | 郑长瑞. 不同整地方式对油茶生长的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2013, 40(3):117-119,127. |
ZHENG Changrui. Effects of Different Site Preparing Modes on the Growth of Camellia oleifera Abel[J]. 2013, 40(3): 117-119,127. | |
[21] | 刘文宏, 赵安成, 张西宁. 黄土高原沟壑区集水造林整地形式试验研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2006,(10):62-64. |
LIU Wenhong, ZHAO Ancheng, ZHANG Xining. Experimental study on the form of water harvesting afforestation in the gully area of Loess Plateau[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2006, (10): 62-64. | |
[22] |
LIU C A, JIN S L, ZHOU L M, et al. Effects of plastic film mulch and tillage on maize productivity and soil parameters[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 31(4): 241-249.
DOI URL |
[23] | 禄兴丽, 段雅欣, 李闪闪, 等. 覆膜对半干旱地区马铃薯生长生理性状及作物产量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(7):1582-1594. |
LU Xingli, DUAN Yaxin, LI Shanshan, et al. Effect of film mulching on potato physiological characters and production in semi-arid area[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2021, 57(7): 1582-1594 | |
[24] | Canellas L P, Silva S F, Olk D, et al. Foliar application of Herbaspirillum seropedicae and humic acid increase maize yields[J]. J Food Agric Environ, 2015, 13(1): 146-153. |
[25] | García A C, Berbara R L L, Farías L P, et al. Humic acids of vermicompost as an ecological pathway to increase resistance of rice seedlings to water stress[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 11(13): 3125-3134. |
[26] | 李柯妮, 王康才, 牛灵慧, 等. 保水技术对干旱胁迫下桔梗种子萌发及幼苗生长和生理特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(11):2280-2289. |
LI Keni, WANG Kangcai, NIU Linghui, et al. Effect of Water Conservation Technique on Seeds Germination,Seedling Growrh and Physiological Characteristics of Platycodon grandiflorum[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(11): 2280-2289. | |
[27] |
Gomes F P, Oliva M A, Mielke M S, et al. Osmotic adjustment, proline accumulation and cell membrane stability in leaves of Cocos nucifera submitted to drought stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 126(3): 379-384.
DOI URL |
[28] | 邱孟柯, 回振龙, 黄晓鹏, 等. 黄腐酸对雾培马铃薯幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(3):155-161. |
Qiu Mengke, HUI Zhenlong, HUANG Xiaopeng, et al. Influences of fulvic acid on drought resistance of aeroponic potato seedlings[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(3): 155-161. | |
[29] | 张永青. 拉萨半干旱河谷河滩地抗旱造林技术研究[D]. 拉萨: 西藏大学, 2010. |
ZAHNG Yongqing. Study on Drought Resistant Forestation Technology of Lhasa Semi-arid Valley and Overflow Land[D]. Lhasa: Tibet University, 2010. | |
[30] |
马艳芝, 王向东, 客绍英, 等. 覆膜处理对北柴胡幼苗生长的影响及评价[J]. 农学学报, 2017, 7(6):67-71.
DOI |
MA Yanzhi, WANG Xiangdong, KE Shaoying, et al. Bupleurum chinense DC.:Effects and Evaluation of Different Coating Treatments on Seedling Growth[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2017, 7(6): 67-71. | |
[31] | GB/T 15776-2016.造林技术规程[S]. |
GB/T 15776-2016.Artificial afforestation technical regulations[S]. |
[1] | WEI Lizhi, Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan, Tangnuer Yeerken, WANG Qiang, XU Dong. Characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica cones and needles traits in response to altitudinal gradients [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2465-2474. |
[2] | ZHANG Yiran, Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan, Baihetiguli Kayier, QI Zhiying. Spatial distribution pattern and prediction of Rhus typhina L. roots sucker in urban green space system [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 2023-2033. |
[3] | XI Li, LI Siyao, XIA Xiaoying, CHEN Yuwen, LI Lin, WANG Jie, MA Xiaolong, Mierzhati Kenijialimu, Aliye Maimaiti, WANG Weixia. Study on soil nutrient characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. Tianschanica forest with different canopy densities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2216-2222. |
[4] | XIA Xiaoying, LI Siyao, WANG Jie, MA Xiaolong, XI Li, Mierzhati Kenijialimu, Aliye Maimaiti, WANG Weixia. Effects of topographic factors on soil organic carbon in Picea schrenkiana forest on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 965-973. |
[5] | XU Shun, LI Chengcheng, Nuerali Abulahati, YANG Yunfei, HAN Dayong. Effects of Functional Leaves with Different Leaf Positions on the Formation of Spike Biomass in Two Habitats of Wetland and Dryland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 472-478. |
[6] | Aliya Alimu, CONG Xiaohan, XIA Xiaoying, XI Li, WANG Weixia. Characteristics of Soil Nutrient under Different Land Use Patterns [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 925-933. |
[7] | WANG Weixia, Aliya Alimu, YANG Guang, WANG Zhenxi. Effects of Land Use Patterns on Soil Liable Organic Carbon and Dissolved Organic Carbon in Typical Arid Desert Oasis Area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 441-450. |
[8] | ZHAO Xuelin,WANG Tiantian,MENG Wenjun,LAN Yan,ZHU Lin. Soil Moisture Dynamics and Water Balance of Hedysarum mongolicum Turez and Artemisia ordosica Shrubs in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(5): 937-946. |
[9] | LUO Lei,WANG Lei,LIU Ping,LI Xi-guang,GAO Ya-qi. Ecosystem health evaluation for Shawan forest in middle part of tianshan mountain in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(8): 1505-1515. |
[10] | ZOU Zhuo-ying, PAN Cun-de, LI Gui-hua, YU Ge-bi, ZHANG Fan, LIU Bo, GUO Ke. The Community Diversity in Pyrogenic Succession of Kanas Taiga and Its Measure Indices [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(5): 785-796. |
[11] | WANG Weixia, YANG Guang, WANG Zhenxi. Effects of Regeneration Patterns on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Picea schrenkiana var tianshanica [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(8): 1474-1483. |
[12] | YANG Yongqiang, WANG Zhenxi, SHI Yuxia, LIAN Ling, GAO Yali. The Extraction of Single Wood Canopy of Picea Schrenkiana var tianshanica Forest Based on UAV Image [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(8): 1484-1492. |
[13] | YANG Guang, Aliya Alimu, WANG Weixia. Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Soil Organic Carbon in Aksu Area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(8): 1542-1550. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 46
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 762
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||