294份芥菜型油菜种质资源全生育期抗旱性鉴定

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.009

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 1639-1647.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.009

294份芥菜型油菜种质资源全生育期抗旱性鉴定

罗玉涛¹(), 侯献飞², 顾元国²(), 李强², 苗昊翠², 贾东海², 邓晓娟¹()

1.新疆农业大学农学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院作物研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2024-12-07 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-09-05
通信作者: 邓晓娟(1984-),女,广西全州人,教授,博士,研究方向为作物遗传育种-种子活力,(E-mail)dengzj007@163.com;
顾元国(1981-),男,新疆奇台人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为油料作物遗传育种,(E-mail)86322533@qq.com
作者简介:罗玉涛(1995-),男,新疆昌吉人,硕士,研究方向为油菜抗旱鉴定,(E-mail)928848945@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重大项目(2022ZD0401005);新疆维吾尔自治区油料产业技术体系(XJARS-05-03);新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项(2022A03004-4)

Evaluation of 294 varieties of brassica rapa cruciferae germplasm for drought resistance throughout the growing season

LUO Yutao¹(), HOU Xianfei², GU Yuanguo²(), LI Qiang², MIAO Haocui², JIA Donghai², DENG Xiaojuan¹()

1. College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Institute of Crops, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2024-12-07 Published:2025-07-20 Online:2025-09-05
Supported by:
National Major Project(2022ZD0401005);Oil Industry Technology System of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XJARS 05-03);Major Science and Technology Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022A03004-4)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】干旱是影响新疆芥菜型油菜生产的主要因素之一,鉴定芥菜型油菜全生育期抗旱性,筛选抗旱性强的的芥菜型油菜种质资源,为油菜抗旱育种提供种质资源和理论依据。【方法】以294份芥菜型油菜种质为材料,于2022~2023年在新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院乌鲁木齐试验站设置正常灌溉、复水、干旱3个处理,测定株高及单株产量,运用抗旱系数、平均隶属函数进行抗旱性鉴定及聚类分析。【结果】不同处理下测定指标差异较大。复水处理使油菜株高和单株产量在2022年和2023年分别下降了9.80%、10.09%和22.48%、39.19%;干旱处理则分别下降了21.05%、20.61%和39.82%、57.16%。不同处理下参试材料的抗旱能力存在显著差异。复水处理及干旱处理下DC>0.900的株高及单株产量的频率分别为54.42%、39.46%、18.71%和18.37%。将复水处理及干旱处理各划分为5个等级,即I级(强抗)、II级(抗)、III级(中抗)、IV级(较敏感)和V级(敏感),并建立芥菜型油菜全生育期多元性回归模型,复水处理:Y=0.500X₁+0.499X₂;干旱处理:Y=0.500X₁+0.500X₂。【结论】筛选出CKH037、CKH087、CKH183、CKH189、CKH209和CKH282强抗品种6份。

关键词: 芥菜型油菜; 全生育期; 抗旱性; 抗旱系数; 隶属函数; 聚类分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 Drought is one of the main factors affecting the production of cultivated mustard rapeseed in Xinjiang. This project aims to identify the drought resistance of mustard rapeseed during the whole growth period and screen the materials with strong drought resistance, so as to provide germplasm resources and theoretical basis for drought resistance breeding. 【Methods】 In this study, 294 mustard rapeseed germlines were set up in Anningqu Experimental Base in Urumqi, Xinjiang in 2022-2023 under three treatments: normal irrigation, rewatering and drought. Plant height and yield per plant were measured. Drought resistance coefficient and average membership function were used for drought resistance identification and cluster analysis. 【Results】 Compared with total irrigation, the measurement indexes of different treatments were significantly different. The plant height and yield per plant decreased by 9.80% and 10.09% in 2022 and 19.35% and 38.07% in 2023, respectively. Drought treatment decreased by 21.05%, 20.61%, 39.82% and 57.16%, respectively. The frequencies of plant height and yield per plant with DC>0.900 under rehydration treatment and drought treatment were 54.42%, 46.26%, 18.71% and 18.37%, respectively. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation value of drought resistance of mustard rapeseed was calculated by means of average membership function standardization analysis, and cluster analysis was conducted on the tested varieties based on this value. Re-watering treatment and drought treatment were divided into 5 grades respectively, namely, I (strong resistance), II (resistance), III (medium resistance), IV (more sensitive) and V (sensitive). The regression model of the whole growth period of mustard rapeseed was established, and the rehydration treatment was as follows: Y=0.500X₁+0.499X₂; Drought treatment: Y=0.500X₁+0.500X₂ 【Conclusion】 Six varieties CKH037, CKH087, CKH183, CKH189, CKH209 and CKH282 with strong resistance are selected through the identification of drought resistance.

Key words: Brassica napus; whole reproductive period; drought resistance; drought resistance coefficient; membership function; cluster analysis

中图分类号:

S565.4

罗玉涛, 侯献飞, 顾元国, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 邓晓娟. 294份芥菜型油菜种质资源全生育期抗旱性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1639-1647.

LUO Yutao, HOU Xianfei, GU Yuanguo, LI Qiang, MIAO Haocui, JIA Donghai, DENG Xiaojuan. Evaluation of 294 varieties of brassica rapa cruciferae germplasm for drought resistance throughout the growing season[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(7): 1639-1647.

图/表 7

参考文献 35

[1]	Huang J P, Yu H P, Dai A G, et al. Drylands face potential threat under 2℃ global warming target[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(6): 417-422.
[2]	马柱国, 符淙斌, 杨庆, 等. 关于我国北方干旱化及其转折性变化[J]. 大气科学, 2018, 42(4): 951-961.
	MA Zhuguo, FU Congbin, YANG Qing, et al. Drying trend in northern China and its shift during 1951-2016[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2018, 42(4): 951-961.
[3]	王姣妍. 新疆气候暖湿化背景下干旱分布与演变特征[J]. 干旱环境监测, 2023, 37(1): 15-21.
	WANG Jiaoyan. The distribution and evolution of Xinjiang’s Arid Zone under climate warming and humidification[J]. Arid Environmental Monitoring, 2023, 37(1): 15-21.
[4]	刘洋, 罗其友, 周振亚, 等. 我国主要农产品供需分析与预测[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(5): 120-127. DOI
	LIU Yang, LUO Qiyou, ZHOU Zhenya, et al. Analysis and prediction of the supply and demand of China’s major agricultural products[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2018, 20(5): 120-127. DOI
[5]	刘后利. 油菜的起源与进化[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 1984, 15(3): 2-5.
	LIU Houli. Origin and evolution of rape[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 1984, 15(3): 2-5.
[6]	钱秀珍, 胡琼, 伍晓明. 中国芥菜型油菜的主要特性[J]. 作物品种资源, 1991,(2): 14-15.
	QIAN Xiuzhen, HU Qiong, WU Xiaoming. Main characteristics of Chinese mustard type rapeseed[J]. China Seed Industry, 1991,(2): 14-15.
[7]	刘淑艳, 刘忠松, 官春云. 芥菜型油菜种质资源研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2007, 8(3): 351-358.
	LIU Shuyan, LIU Zhongsong, GUAN Chunyun. Advances in germplasm of oilseed Brassica juncea[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2007, 8(3): 351-358.
[8]	陈宏州. 油菜田日本看麦娘的抗药性研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
	CHEN Hongzhou. Study on resistance of Japonicum japonicum in rape field[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011.
[9]	兰巨生, 胡福顺, 张景瑞. 作物抗旱指数的概念和统计方法[J]. 华北农学报, 1990, 5(2): 20-25. DOI
	LAN Jusheng, HU Fushun, ZHANG Jingrui. The concept and statistical method of drought resistance index in crops[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali—Sinica, 1990, 5(2): 20-25.
[10]	郑桂萍, 李金峰, 钱永德, 等. 农作物综合抗旱性指标的评价分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(10): 109-110, 165.
	ZHENG Guiping, LI Jinfeng, QIAN Yongde, et al. Evaluation on comprehensive drought resistant index of crops[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(10): 109-110, 165. DOI
[11]	张鸿, 李其勇, 朱从桦, 等. 作物抗旱性鉴定的主要评价方法[J]. 四川农业科技, 2017,(6): 7-9.
	ZHANG Hong, LI Qiyong, ZHU Conghua, et al. Main evaluation methods of crop drought resistance identification[J]. Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(6): 7-9.
[12]	龚明. 作物抗旱性鉴定方法与指标及其综合评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 1989, 4(1): 73-81.
	GONG Ming. Screening methods and indexes of drought resistance in crops and comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 1989, 4(1): 73-81.
[13]	李龙, 毛新国, 王景一, 等. 小麦种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 988-999. DOI
	LI Long, MAO Xinguo, WANG Jingyi, et al. Drought tolerance evaluation of wheat germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(7): 988-999. DOI
[14]	徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 等. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 448-461. DOI
	XU Yinping, PAN Yongdong, LIU Qiangde, et al. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indexes screening of barley resources at mature period[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(3): 448-461. DOI
[15]	王兴荣, 李玥, 张彦军, 等. 青稞种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1279-1287. DOI
	WANG Xingrong, LI Yue, ZHANG Yanjun, et al. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indexes screening of Tibetan hulless barley resources at adult stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1279-1287. DOI
[16]	汪灿, 周棱波, 张国兵, 等. 薏苡种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(9): 1381-1394.
	WANG Can, ZHOU Lingbo, ZHANG Guobing, et al. Identification and indices screening of drought resistance at adult plant stage in Job’s tears germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(9): 1381-1394.
[17]	李庆刚, 周翠萍, 原小燕, 等. 旱地油菜耐旱品种筛选试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020,(6): 30-32.
	LI Qinggang, ZHOU Cuiping, YUAN Xiaoyan, et al. Screening test of drought-tolerant varieties of rapeseed in dry land[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020,(6): 30-32.
[18]	岳瑶琴, 赵彤, 余青兰, 等. 342份油菜种质资源抗旱性评价研究[J]. 青海大学学报, 2023, 41(2): 29-36, 55.
	YUE Yaoqin, ZHAO Tong, YU Qinglan, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of 342 samples of rapeseed germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Qinghai University, 2023, 41(2): 29-36, 55.
[19]	葛道阔, 曹宏鑫, 杨余旺, 等. 干旱胁迫下油菜栽培模拟优化决策系统(Rape-CSODS)的订正及其检验[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2019, 35(1): 56-62.
	GE Daokuo, CAO Hongxin, YANG Yuwang, et al. Modification and verification of rape-CSODS under drought stress[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 35(1): 56-62.
[20]	赵彤, 余青兰, 姚艳梅, 等. 不同品种甘蓝型油菜的抗旱性评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2021, 56(1): 85-93.
	ZHAO Tong, YU Qinglan, YAO Yanmei, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of different of Brassica napus cultivars[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2021, 56(1): 85-93.
[21]	王瑞霞, 李小玉, 田宏先. 晋北区芥菜型油菜抗旱性鉴定及综合抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11): 42-51. DOI
	WANG Ruixia, LI Xiaoyu, TIAN Hongxian. Drought resistance identification and comprehensive drought resistance index screening of rapeseed (Brassica juncea L.) in north Shanxi[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 42-51. DOI
[22]	李继强, 甘蓝型油菜抗旱优异种质筛选[Z]. 甘肃省,张掖市农业科学研究院,2018-12-01.
	LI Jiqiang, Screening of excellent drought resistant germplasm of brassica napus[Z]. Zhangye Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Gansu Province,2018-12-01.
[23]	伍晓明, 陈碧云, 陆光远, 等. 油菜种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
	WU Xiaoming, CHEN Biyun, LU Guangyuan. Descriptors and data standard for rapeseed (Brassica spp. )[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.
[24]	祁旭升, 刘章雄, 关荣霞, 等. 大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定评价方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(4): 665-674.
	QI Xusheng, LIU Zhangxiong, GUAN Rongxia, et al. Comparison of evaluation methods for drought-resistance at soybean adult stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(4): 665-674.
[25]	祁旭升, 王兴荣, 许军, 等. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087.
	QI Xusheng, WANG Xingrong, XU Jun, et al. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087.
[26]	张彦军, 苟作旺, 王兴荣, 等. 胡麻种质萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(3): 520-527.
	ZHANG Yanjun, GOU Zuowang, WANG Xingrong, et al. Comprehensive valuation of drought resistance of flax germplasm in germination[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(3): 520-527. DOI
[27]	郭雪松. 油菜种质资源耐旱性的鉴定[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2009.
	GUO Xuesong. Identification of drought tolerance of rape germplasm resources[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2009.
[28]	黎裕. 作物抗旱鉴定方法与指标[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1993, 11(1): 91-99.
	LI Yu. The identification method and index for crop drought resistance[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1993, 11(1): 91-99.
[29]	原小燕, 符明联, 张云云, 等. 油菜和甘芥杂交后代薹花期耐旱性鉴定[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(1): 84-93.
	YUAN Xiaoyan, FU Minglian, ZHANG Yunyun, et al. Drought tolerance of rapeseed and hybrids of Brassica napus and Brassica juncea at budding and flowering periods[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2018, 40(1): 84-93.
[30]	符明联, 李根泽, 杨清辉, 等. 隶属函数法鉴定油菜甘芥种间杂交后代的抗旱性[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33(4): 368-373.
	FU Minglian, LI Genze, YANG Qinghui, et al. Drought tolerance identification of interspecific hybrids from Brassica napus and Brassica juncea by subordinate function values[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2011, 33(4): 368-373.
[31]	昌决, 王建林, 胡兴祥. 20份印度芥菜型油菜材料的抗旱性评价[J]. 西藏科技, 2013, (4): 4-7.
	CHANG Jue, WANG Jianlin, HU Xingxiang. Evaluation of drought resistance of 20 Indian mustard type rape materials[J]. Tibet’s Science and Technology, 2013, (4): 4-7.
[32]	殷婷, 余青兰, 赵志刚. 油菜抗旱性产量指标及品种筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(3): 450-463. DOI
	YIN Ting, YU Qinglan, ZHAO Zhigang. Drought resistance yield index and varieties selection of rapeseed[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(3): 450-463. DOI
[33]	王兴荣, 刘章雄, 张彦军, 等. 大豆种质资源不同生育时期抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(6): 1582-1594.
	WANG Xingrong, LIU Zhangxiong, ZHANG Yanjun, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of soybean germplasm resources at multiple growth periods[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(6): 1582-1594.
[34]	武瑞鑫, 李源, 游永亮, 等. 紫花苜蓿全生育期抗旱性鉴定评价方法探讨[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1444-1453. DOI
	WU Ruixin, LI Yuan, YOU Yongliang, et al. Study on drought resistance identification and evaluation methods of alfalfa during whole growth period[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1444-1453. DOI
[35]	关周博, 董育红, 田建华, 等. 干旱胁迫下3个油菜品种地上、地下部生长特征与抗旱性的关系[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(5): 114-118.
	GUAN Zhoubo, DONG Yuhong, TIAN Jianhua, et al. Relationship between growth characteristics of above- and under-ground and drought resistance of three rapeseed cultivars under drought stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(5): 114-118.

处理方法 Treatment method
灌水 Well watered				复水 Rehydration				干旱 Drought stress
年份 Years	2022年株高	2023年株高	2022年单株产量	2023年单株产量	2022年株高	2023年株高	2022年单株产量	2023年单株产量	2022年株高	2023年株高	2022年单株产量	2023年单株产量
平均值 Mean	129.86	118.95	17.89	18.09	117.14	106.95	13.90	11.00	102.52	94.44	10.79	7.75
标准差 SD	21.31	20.47	8.59	8.73	18.83	17.80	6.20	5.21	19.17	23.13	5.15	4.49
变异系数 CV(%)	16.40	17.21	48.02	48.26	16.07	16.64	44.60	47.36	18.70	24.09	47.73	57.94
下降幅度 Change amplitude (%)	0	0	0	0	9.80	10.09	22.48	39.19	21.05	20.61	39.82	57.16

处理方法 Treatment method
灌水 Well watered				复水 Rehydration				干旱 Drought stress
年份 Years	2022年株高	2023年株高	2022年单株产量	2023年单株产量	2022年株高	2023年株高	2022年单株产量	2023年单株产量	2022年株高	2023年株高	2022年单株产量	2023年单株产量
平均值 Mean	129.86	118.95	17.89	18.09	117.14	106.95	13.90	11.00	102.52	94.44	10.79	7.75
标准差 SD	21.31	20.47	8.59	8.73	18.83	17.80	6.20	5.21	19.17	23.13	5.15	4.49
变异系数 CV(%)	16.40	17.21	48.02	48.26	16.07	16.64	44.60	47.36	18.70	24.09	47.73	57.94
下降幅度 Change amplitude (%)	0	0	0	0	9.80	10.09	22.48	39.19	21.05	20.61	39.82	57.16

参数 Parameter	复水处理Rehydration treatment				干旱处理Drought treatment
参数 Parameter	株高 Plant height (2022)	株高 Plant height (2023)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2022)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2023)	株高 Plant height (2022)	株高 Plant height (2023)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2022)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2023)
最大值 Max	1.548	1.491	1.988	1.995	1.683	1.298	1.825	1.980
最小值Min	0.642	0.622	0.213	0.087	0.445	0.116	0.104	0.024
均值 Average	0.915	0.916	0.934	0.767	0.804	0.814	0.758	0.562
标准差SD	0.12	0.13	0.39	0.37	0.15	0.21	0.37	0.35
变异系数 CV(%)	13.11	14.19	41.76	48.24	18.66	25.80	48.81	62.28

参数 Parameter	复水处理Rehydration treatment				干旱处理Drought treatment
参数 Parameter	株高 Plant height (2022)	株高 Plant height (2023)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2022)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2023)	株高 Plant height (2022)	株高 Plant height (2023)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2022)	单株产量 Yield per plant (2023)
最大值 Max	1.548	1.491	1.988	1.995	1.683	1.298	1.825	1.980
最小值Min	0.642	0.622	0.213	0.087	0.445	0.116	0.104	0.024
均值 Average	0.915	0.916	0.934	0.767	0.804	0.814	0.758	0.562
标准差SD	0.12	0.13	0.39	0.37	0.15	0.21	0.37	0.35
变异系数 CV(%)	13.11	14.19	41.76	48.24	18.66	25.80	48.81	62.28

指标 Indexes	株高(复水) Plant height (rehydration)	单株产量(复水) Yield per plant (rehydration)	株高 (干旱) Plant height (drought)	单株产量 (干旱) Yield per plant (drought)	平均隶属值 (复水) $A\mu ($x) (rehydration)	平均隶属值 (干旱) $A\mu ($x) (drought)
株高(复水) Plant height(rehydration)	1
单株产量(复水) Yield per plant (rehydration)	0.987^**	1
株高(干旱) Plant height(drought)	0.962^**	0.922^**	1
单株产量(干旱) Yield per plant (drought)	0.989^**	0.990^**	0.955^**	1
平均隶属值(复水) $A\mu ($x)(rehydration)	0.996^**	0.985^**	0.957^**	0.991^**	1
平均隶属值(干旱) $A\mu ($x)(drought)	0.993^**	0.979^**	0.965^**	0.987^**	0.993^**	1

294份芥菜型油菜种质资源全生育期抗旱性鉴定

Evaluation of 294 varieties of brassica rapa cruciferae germplasm for drought resistance throughout the growing season

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treatments	多元线性回归方程 Multiple linear regression equation	决定系数 R²	P值 P-value	检验组相关性系数 Correlation coefficient of inspection group
复水处理Aμ(X)值 Rehydration treatment Aμ(X)-value	Y=0.500X₁+0.499X₂	0.999	0.000 1	0.999
干旱处理Aμ(X)值 drought stress treatments Aμ(X)-value	Y=0.500X₁+0.500X₂	0.999	0.000 1	0.999

[1]	顾美英, 葛春辉, 楚敏, 唐琦勇, 朱静, 艾尼江·尔斯满, 易鸳鸯, 徐万里, 张志东. 基于主成分-隶属函数分析法评价复合菌对小麦根际土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1612-1623.
[2]	赵月, 罗正乾, 王清清, 徐琳黎, 王仙, 向莉, 于月华, 刘恩良. 甘薯品种抗旱性评价及抗旱品种筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1677-1686.
[3]	施俊杰, 侯献飞, 于月华, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 胡凤仪, 高君, 崔福洋, 尚随腾. 高油酸花生全生育期耐盐性鉴定与品种筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(6): 1354-1364.
[4]	何成龙, 白茹, 王志军, 毛永乐, 姚瑞赟, 王艺雯, 张宗翊. 不同轻基质配比对突尼斯软籽石榴容器苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(6): 1442-1452.
[5]	樊德鹏, 陈玉鹏, 石洁, 琚艳君, 邢斌德, 江应红, 刘易, 赵多勇. 新疆不同马铃薯品种品质性状的综合分析与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(5): 1111-1120.
[6]	刘旭欢, 于姗, 刘跃, 石书兵. 不同品种春小麦种子萌发期耐低温性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 820-828.
[7]	郝曦煜, 张仲鹃, 郑成栋, 张斯文, 张瑾, 郑春秀, 吴世凯, 王雪. 不同鲜食玉米品种(系)农艺性状与产量的比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 837-849.
[8]	李明, 郑焕斌, 王明晶, 赵北方, 张斯童, 杨素欣. 盐胁迫对大豆苗期根系的影响及GWAS分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 627-643.
[9]	伊风艳, 孙世贤, 郭呈宇, 闫晓红, 房永雨, 杨鼎, 丁海君. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下11份野生冰草种质资源萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 723-731.
[10]	叶朵朵, 孟新涛, 古丽米热·祖努纳, 阿比代姆·阿卜杜热伊木, 库尔班娜依·吐尔逊麦麦提, 张婷, 马燕, 潘俨. 非浓缩还原(NFC)枸杞汁加工过程中品质变化特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 361-372.
[11]	王贺亚, 罗静静, 孟玲, 李怀胜, 艾海峰, 贾东海. 基于主成分和聚类分析综合评价塔额盆地油菜新品种(系)[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 118-128.
[12]	曾婉盈, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤, 李思忠, 钱松廷, 高卫时, 张立明. 甜菜品系叶丛快速生长期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151.
[13]	李金瑶, 徐贵青, 王立生, 吕平, 石东方, 郑伟华. 氮肥对头状沙拐枣幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340.
[14]	苗雨, 陈翠霞, 马艳明, 邢国芳, 董裕生, 陈智军, 王仙, 向莉. 276份中亚大麦种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895.
[15]	刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.