双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.004

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 810-822.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.004

• 作物遗传育种·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇下一篇

双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响

丁宇¹^,²^,³(), 张江辉², 白云岗²(), 刘洪波², 郑明², 赵经华¹, 肖军², 韩政宇¹^,²

1.新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆水利水电科学院,乌鲁木齐 830049
3.农业农村部盐碱土改良与利用(干旱半干旱区盐碱地)重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2022-08-16 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-05-06
通信作者: 白云岗(1974-),男,新疆奇台人,教授级高级工程师,博士,研究方向为农业水土工程,(E-mail)xjbaiyg@sina.com
作者简介:丁宇(1998-),男,硕士研究生,河南新乡人,研究方向为节水灌溉技术,(E-mail)dy98206@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目“节水抑盐灌排协同调控技术模式及示范”(2021YFD1900805);自治区公益性科研院所基本科研业务经费项目(KY2022127)

Effects of different dry sowing and wet-out water treatments on cotton physiology, growth characteristics and yield under double film conditions

DING Yu¹^,²^,³(), ZHANG Jianghui², BAI Yungang²(), LIU Hongbo², ZHENG Ming², ZHAO Jinghua¹, XIAO Jun², HAN Zhengyu¹^,²

1. College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering,Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Xinjiang Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Urumqi 830049, China
3. Key Laboratory of Saline-alkali Soil Improvement and Utilization (Saline-Alkali Land In Arid and Semi-Arid Regions), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. China, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2022-08-16 Published:2023-04-20 Online:2023-05-06
Correspondence author: BAI Yungang(1974 -), male, doctor, professor level senior engineer, mainly engaged in agricultural water and soil engineering research (E-mail) xjbaiyg@sina.com
Supported by:
National Key R & D Project "Water Saving and Salt Suppression Irrigation and Drainage Coordinated Regulation Technology Mode and Demonstration"(2021YFD1900805);Basic Scientific R & D Program of Public Welfare Research Institutions of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China(KY2022127)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同灌水定额及滴灌频次对棉花生理、生长特性及产量的影响规律。【方法】在新疆阿克苏地区沙雅县开展大田试验。试验共设计5个不同灌水定额及滴灌频次处理(S₁:675 m³/hm²,S₂:900 m³/hm²,S₃:1 125 m³/hm²,S₄:675 m³/hm²+450 m³/hm²,S₅:675 m³/hm²+300 m³/hm²+150 m³/hm²),1个冬灌对照处理(CK:2 700 m³/hm²),分析不同水分处理对棉花生理、生长状况及产量的影响。【结果】(1)在株高及干物质量表现上,随灌溉定额增加,在苗期至吐絮期呈先减小后升高的趋势,其中CK与S₁处理在苗期无显著差异,与S₃处理在蕾期至吐絮期差异性较小。随滴水频次增加,在苗期至吐絮期呈显著升高趋势,其中CK与S₅处理差异性较小。(2)在叶绿素荧光表现上,随灌溉定额增加叶绿素荧光参数呈显著降低趋势,其中CK显著大于各灌水定额处理。随滴水频次增加叶绿素荧光参数逐渐增加,其中CK与S₅处理荧光参数差异性较小。叶绿素荧光参数Fm'值与棉花群体叶面积指数呈良好线性关系,Fo'值与干物质累积量建立的相关性模型决定系数较高。(3)在群体生理指标及产量表现上,随灌溉定额及滴水频次增加棉花群体生理指标呈逐渐升高的趋势,其中CK与S₅处理差异性较小。各干播湿出处理中S₅处理棉花产量及灌溉水分生产效率显著较高,与CK处理相比,产量大小无显著差异,灌溉水分生产效率升高26.7%。【结论】低出苗水量、高滴水频次处理(S₅)对于棉花生长促进作用更强,作物产量更高,且有着较高的灌溉水分生产效率,能够达到节水增产的目的。

关键词: 棉花; 双膜覆盖; 干播湿出; 水分调控; 生理生长特性; 叶绿素荧光参数

Abstract:

【Objective】This project aims to study the influence of different irrigation quota and drip irrigation frequency on cotton physiology. 【Methods】Growth characteristics and yield by performing field experiments in Shaya County, Aksu Prefecture, Xinjiang. Five different irrigation quota and drip irrigation frequency treatments (S₁:675 m³/hm², S₂:900 m³/hm², S₃:1,125 m³/hm², S₄:675 m³/hm²+450 m³/hm², S₅:675 m³/hm²+300 m³/hm²+150 m³/hm²) and one winter irrigation control treatment (CK:2,700 m³/hm²) were designed to analyze the effects of different water treatments on cotton physiology, growth and yield.【Results】(1) As for the performance of plant height and dry matter quality, with the increase of irrigation quota, it first decreased and then increased from seedling stage to boll opening stage. There was no significant difference between CK and S₁ treatment at seedling stage, and there was little difference between CK and S₃ treatment from bud stage to boll opening stage. With the increase of drip frequency, it increased significantly from seedling stage to boll opening stage, and the difference between CK and S₅ was small. (2) In the performance of chlorophyll fluorescence, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters decreased significantly with the increase of irrigation quota, and CK was significantly greater than that of each irrigation quota treatment. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters increased with the increase of dripping frequency, and the difference between CK and S₅ was small. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fm' had a good linear relationship with the cotton population leaf area index, and the correlation model between Fo' and dry matter accumulation had a high determination coefficient. (3) In terms of population physiological indexes and yield performance, the population physiological indexes of cotton showed a gradually increasing trend with the increase of irrigation quota and drip frequency, and there was little difference between CK and S₅. In each dry sowing and wet-out treatment, S₅ treatment had significantly higher cotton yield and irrigation water production efficiency. Compared with CK treatment, there was no significant difference in yield, and the irrigation water production efficiency increased by 26.7%.【Conclusion】Comprehensive analysis shows that the treatment of low seedling emergence water volume and high dripping frequency (S₅) has a stronger promoting effect on cotton growth, higher crop yield, higher irrigation water production efficiency, and can achieve the purpose of water saving and yield increasing.

Key words: cotton; double film covering; dry sowing and wet-out; water regulation; physiological growth characteristics; chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

中图分类号:

S562

丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 刘洪波, 郑明, 赵经华, 肖军, 韩政宇. 双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 810-822.

DING Yu, ZHANG Jianghui, BAI Yungang, LIU Hongbo, ZHENG Ming, ZHAO Jinghua, XIAO Jun, HAN Zhengyu. Effects of different dry sowing and wet-out water treatments on cotton physiology, growth characteristics and yield under double film conditions[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 810-822.

图/表 15

表1 土壤粒径

Tab.1 Soil particle size analysis

深度 Depth (cm)	>0.05 mm (%)	0.05~ 0.002 mm (%)	<0.002 mm (%)	土壤质地 Soil texture
0~10	35.7	55.2	9.1	粉(砂)壤土
10~20	41.2	53.0	5.8	粉(砂)壤土
20~30	39.9	51.3	8.8	粉(砂)壤土
30~40	36.9	55.0	8.1	粉(砂)壤土
40~60	39.1	52.3	8.6	粉(砂)壤土
60~80	22.4	68.6	9.0	粉(砂)壤土
80~100	25.5	68.9	5.6	粉(砂)壤土

表2 棉花生育期灌水

Tab.2 Irrigation test scheme for cotton growth period

序号 Serial number	灌水日期 (年-月-日) Filling date (Year-Month-Day)	灌水定额 Irrigation quota(m³/hm²)
序号 Serial number	灌水日期 (年-月-日) Filling date (Year-Month-Day)	S₁	S₂	S₃	S₄	S₅	CK
1	2020-11-15	0	0	0	0	0	2 700
2	2021-04-19	675	900	1 125	675	675	0
3	2021-04-22	0	0	0	450	300	0
4	2021-04-25	0	0	0	0	150	0
5	2021-06-02	275	275	275	275	275	275
6	2021-06-15	270	270	270	270	270	270
7	2021-06-30	333	333	333	333	333	333
8	2021-07-16	347	347	347	347	347	347
9	2021-08-01	312	312	312	312	312	312
10	2021-08-16	321	321	321	321	321	321
11	2021-09-02	225	225	225	225	225	225
12	2021-09-17	225	225	225	225	225	225
合计Total	-	2 983	3 208	3 433	3 433	3 433	5 008

图1 种植方式和滴灌带布置

Fig.1 Planting method and drip irrigation belt layout

图2 不同水分处理下棉花株高变化注:S1、S2、S3分别表示干播湿出灌溉定额为675、900、1 125 m3/hm2处理,S3、S4、S5分别表示干播湿出滴水频次为1次、2次、3次滴水处理,CK表示冬灌对照处理;不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05),下同

Fig.2 Effect of different water treatments on cotton plant height Note: S1, S2 and S3 respectively indicate that the irrigation quota of dry sowing and wet sowing is 675, 900 and 1,125m3/hm2, S3, S4 and S5 respectively indicate that the frequency of dry sowing and wet dripping is 1, 2 and 3 dripping treatments, and CK indicates the winter irrigation control treatment; Different small letters indicate significant difference among different treatments (P<0.05), the same as below

图3 不同水分处理下棉花茎粗变化

Fig.3 Effect of different water treatments on cotton stem diameter

图4 不同水分处理下棉花干物质累积量变化

Fig. 4 Effect of different water treatments on dry matter accumulation of cotton

图5 不同灌溉定额及滴水频次处理影响下棉花群体生理指标变化趋势

Fig.5 Change trend of cotton population growth index under the influence of different irrigation quota and drip frequency treatment

图6 不同水分处理下Fo'和Fm'值变化

Fig.6 Effects of different moisture treatments on Fo 'and Fm' values

表3 不同水分处理棉花幼苗叶绿素荧光参数Fv'/Fm'和Yield值的方差及多重比较

Tab.3 Variance Analysis and multiple comparison results of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters Fv'/Fm' and Yield values of Cotton Seedlings under different water treatments

处理 Treatment	Fv'/Fm'	Yield	P
S₁	0.551±0.035^d	0.422±0.020^e	<0.01
S₂	0.612±0.036^c	0.511±0.026^d
S₃	0.665±0.010^c	0.576±0.010^c
S₄	0.696±0.026^b	0.615±0.036^bc
S₅	0.744±0.020^ab	0.654±0.017^ab
CK	0.753±0.026^a	0.663±0.010^a

图7 不同水分处理下棉花幼苗qP值变化

Fig.7 Effect of different water treatments on qP value of cotton seedlings

图8 Fm'实际值与叶面积指数预测值拟合

Fig.8 Fitting results between actual value of Fm' and predicted value of leaf area index

表4 叶面积指数与叶绿素荧光参数相关性

Tab.4 Correlation analysis between leaf area index and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

叶绿素荧光参数 Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	回归方程 Regression equation	决定系数R² Coefficient of determination R²	P
Fo'	0.867^**	y=2.840-0.060x	0.737	<0.01
Fm'	0.896^**	y=1.951-0.001x	0.791	<0.01
Yield	0.775^**	y=2.481-2.297x	0.576	<0.01
Fv'/Fm'	0.711^**	y=2.831-2.489x	0.475	<0.01
qP	0.510*	y=1.817-1.059x	0.214	<0.05

表5 地上干物质累积量与叶绿素荧光参数相关性

Tab.5 Correlation analysis between aboveground dry matter accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

叶绿素荧光参数 Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	回归方程 Regression equation	决定系数R² Coefficient of determination R²	P
Fo'	0.636^**	y=14.315-0.024x	0.367	<0.01
Fm'	0.593^**	y=10.240-0.003x	0.311	<0.01
Yield	0.635^**	y=13.448-10.846x	0.366	<0.01
Fv'/Fm'	0.592^**	y=15.230-11.946x	0.310	<0.01
qP	0.322	y=9.614-3.854x	0.048	>0.05

图9 Fo'实际值与地上干物质量预测值拟合结果

Fig.9 Fitting results between actual value of Fo 'and predicted value of aboveground dry matter mass

表6 不同水分处理棉花产量及水分生产效率

Tab.6 Cotton yield and water production efficiency under different water treatments

处理 Handle	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	灌水量 Irrigation quantity (m³/hm²)	灌溉水分生产效率 Irrigation water production efficiency (kg/m³)
S₁	4 252.3^e	2 983	1.43^c
S₂	4 527.5^d	3 208	1.41^c
S₃	4 876.3^c	3 433	1.42^c
S₄	5 301.5^b	3 433	1.54^b
S₅	5 543.3^a	3 433	1.61^a
CK	5 687.5^a	5 008	1.18^d

参考文献 27

[1]	陆红娜, 康绍忠, 杜太生, 等. 农业绿色高效节水研究现状与未来发展趋势[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1):155-162.
	LU hongna, KANG Shaozhong, DU Taisheng, et al. Research status and future development trend of green, efficient and water saving in agriculture[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(1): 155-162.
[2]	王振华, 杨培岭, 郑旭荣, 等. 膜下滴灌系统不同应用年限棉田根区盐分变化及适耕性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(4):90-99.
	WANG Zhenhua, YANG Peiling, ZHENG Xurong, et al. Changes of salt content in root zone of cotton field and its suitability for cultivation in different application years of drip irrigation system under film[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(4): 90-99.
[3]	陈绪兰, 孙春梅, 刘萍. 棉花“干播湿出”技术在新疆库尔勒推广实践[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(5):41-42,45.
	CHEN Xulan, SUN Chunmei, LIU Ping. Popularization and practice of cotton "dry sowing and wet out" technology in Korla, Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(5): 41-42,45.
[4]	艾先涛, 王俊铎, 赛建国, 等. 新疆棉花双膜覆盖增温效应分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(3):430-436.
	AI Xiantao, WANG Junduo, SAI Jianguo, et al. Analysis on the warming effect of cotton double film mulching in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(3): 430-436.
[5]	陈学庚, 赵岩. 棉花双膜覆盖精量播种机的研制[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(4):106-112.
	CHEN Xuegeng, ZHAO Yan. Development of cotton precision seeder with double film mulching[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(4): 106-112.
[6]	张迎春, 张富仓, 范军亮, 等. 滴灌技术参数对南疆棉花生长和土壤水盐的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(24):107-117.
	ZHANG Yingchun, ZHANG Fucang, FAN Junliang, et al. Effects of drip irrigation technical parameters on cotton growth and soil water and salt in southern Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(24): 107-117.
[7]	王克全, 王国栋, 梁飞, 等. 灌溉定额对膜下滴灌春玉米土壤水热空间分布及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(11):25-29,41.
	WANG Kequan, WANG Guodong, LIANG Fei, et al. Effects of irrigation quota on spatial distribution of soil moisture and heat and yield of spring maize under drip irrigation under plastic film[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(11): 25-29,41.
[8]	汪保华, 王亚峰, 谢晓玲, 等. 盐胁迫下棉花叶绿素荧光参数的变化[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(7):1509-1512.
	WANG Baohua, WANG Yafeng, XIE Xiaoling, et al. Changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cotton under salt stress[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 53(7): 1509-1512.
[9]	张玲, 王华, 周静, 等. NaCl胁迫对两个辣椒品种幼苗叶绿素荧光参数等生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(4):597-604. DOI
	ZHANG Ling, WANG Hua, ZHOU Jing, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and other physiological characteristics of two pepper varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(4): 597-604. DOI
[10]	王可玢, 许春辉, 赵福洪, 等. 水分胁迫对小麦旗叶某些体内叶绿素a荧光参数的影响[J]. 生物物理学报, 1997(2):123-128.
	WANG Kefen, XU Chunhui, ZHAO Fuhong, et al. Effects of water stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in some flag leaves of wheat[J]. Journal of Biophysics, 1997(2): 123-128.
[11]	Wang Shihong, Mao Lili, Shi Jialiang, et al. Effects of plant density and nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use in cotton stubble retaining fields[J]. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2021, 20(8):2090-2099.
[12]	张金珠, 王振华, 虎胆·吐马尔白. 干旱区秸秆覆盖对滴灌棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2014, 32(4):350-355.
	ZHANG Jinzhu, WANG Zhenhua, Hudan Tumaerbai. Effects of straw mulch on cotton growth and yield under drip irrigation in arid areas[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2014, 32(4): 350-355.
[13]	张守仁. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J]. 植物学通报, 1999,(4):444-448.
	ZHANG Shouren. Significance and discussion of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic parameters[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999(4): 444-448.
[14]	尤鑫, 龚吉蕊. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及实例辨析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2012, 41(5):90-94.
	YOU Xin, GONG Jirui. Significance and case analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic parameters[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2012, 41(5): 90-94.
[15]	王娟, 危常州, 朱金龙, 等. 不同生育期干旱胁迫对棉花叶片生理指标及生物量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(4):596-604.
	WANG Juan, WEI Changzhou, ZHU Jinlong, et al. Effects of drought stress at different growth stages on physiological indexes and biomass of cotton leaves[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(4): 596-604.
[16]	随龙龙, 田景山, 姚贺盛, 等. 播期温度对新疆膜下滴灌棉花出苗率及苗期生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(21):4040-4051. DOI
	SUI Longlong, TIAN Jingshan, YAO Hesheng, et al. Effects of sowing temperature on emergence rate and seedling growth of cotton under drip irrigation under mulch in Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(21): 4040-4051.
[17]	杨九刚, 何继武, 马英杰, 等. 灌水频率和灌溉定额对膜下滴灌棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2011,(3):29-32,38.
	YANG Jiugang, HE Jiwu, MA Yingjie, et al. Effects of irrigation frequency and irrigation quota on cotton growth and yield under film drip irrigation[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2011,(3): 29-32,38.
[18]	赵波, 王振华, 李文昊. 滴灌方式及定额对北疆冬灌棉田土壤水盐分布及次年棉花生长的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(6):139-148.
	ZHAO Bo, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao. Effects of drip irrigation methods and quotas on soil water and salt distribution and cotton growth in the next year in winter irrigated cotton fields in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(6): 139-148.
[19]	孙文君, 江晓慧, 付媛媛, 等. 盐分胁迫对棉花幼苗叶片叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(7):23-28,121.
	SUN Wenjun, JIANG Xiaohui, FU Yuanyuan, et al. Effects of salt stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cotton seedling leaves[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(7): 23-28,121.
[20]	于凤, 高丽, 闫志坚, 等. 库布齐沙地6种植物叶绿素荧光参数比较[J]. 草业科学, 2012, 29(1):83-87.
	YU Feng, GAO Li, YAN Zhijian, et al. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of six plants in Kubuqi sandy land[J]. Pratacultural science, 2012, 29(1): 83-87.
[21]	黄艳萍, 袁萍, 沈晓萌, 等. 水分胁迫对广藿香叶绿素荧光特征的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(1):171-173,177.
	HUANG Yanping, YUAN Ping, SHEN Xiaomeng, et al. Effects of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of patchouli[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(1): 171-173,177.
[22]	吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 王志高, 等. 干旱和复水对草莓叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(14):3941-3946.
	WU Ganlin, DUAN Renyan, WANG Zhigao, et al. Effects of drought and rehydration on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of strawberry leaves[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(14): 3941-3946.
[23]	刘瑞显, 王友华, 陈兵林, 等. 花铃期干旱胁迫下氮素水平对棉花光合作用与叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008,(4):675-683.
	LIU Ruixian, WANG Youhua, CHEN Binglin, et al. Effects of nitrogen level on Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of cotton under drought stress at flowering and bolling stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, (4): 675-683.
[24]	丁怡人, 李冬梅, 马露露, 等. 滴灌棉花叶绿素荧光参数与棉花生长指标反演模型研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(6):234-242,248.
	DING Yiren, LI Dongmei, MA Lulu, et al. Study on inversion model of cotton chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and cotton growth indexes under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2020, 38(6): 234-242,248.
[25]	杨莹攀, 孙文君, 付媛媛, 等. 水盐胁迫对早熟棉花品种"中棉619"幼苗生长的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(5):39-45.
	YANG Yingpan, SUN Wenjun, FU Yuanyuan, et al. Effects of water and salt stress on seedling growth of early maturing cotton variety "Zhongmian 619"[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(5):39-45.
[26]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 等. 不同灌水频率水分胁迫对北疆棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021,(5):49-54.
	JIANG Zhu, ZHANG Jianghui, BAI Yungang, et al. Effects of water stress at different irrigation frequencies on cotton growth and yield in Northern Xinjiang[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021, (5): 49-54.
[27]	王永东. 膜下滴灌灌溉制度对棉花生长和产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江水利, 2015, 1(12):21-25.
	WANG Yongdong. Effects of drip irrigation under film on cotton growth and yield[J]. Heilongjiang Water Resources, 2015, 1(12): 21-25.

双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响

Effects of different dry sowing and wet-out water treatments on cotton physiology, growth characteristics and yield under double film conditions

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	苗红萍, 王晓伟, 田聪华, 李志, 张玉新, 戴俊生. 塔里木河流域棉花生产与布局演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226.
[2]	王俊铎, 崔豫疆, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产优势区域分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69.
[3]	郑巨云, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 耿世伟, 孙丰磊, 阳妮, 李雪源, 王俊铎. 新疆机采棉花生产关键技术模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74.
[4]	李杰, 刘佳, 王亮, 张娜, 杨延龙, 郑子漂, 魏鑫, 王萌, 周子馨, 阳妮, 龚照龙, 侯献飞, 黄启秀, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 张济鹏, 张鹏忠. “棉、油、糖”科技成果转化现状及应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94.
[5]	扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100.
[6]	李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102.
[7]	张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[8]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[9]	黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[10]	王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[11]	张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[12]	董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844.
[13]	赖成霞, 杨延龙, 李春平, 玛依拉·玉素音, 王燕, 杨栋, 阳妮, 葛风伟, 汪鹏龙, 马君. 落叶型棉花黄萎病的生物学特征及药剂防治分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2034-2042.
[14]	刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
[15]	高君, 侯献飞, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 汪天玲, 黄奕, 陈晓露, 李强. 棉花-花生轮作模式对花生干物质积累量分配及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1648-1656.