

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 30-38.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.004
• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇 下一篇
曹阳1(
), 严玉萍1, 朱波1, 冯振秀1, 周小凤2, 吕博3, 张燕1, 方瑞1
收稿日期:2021-01-25
出版日期:2022-01-20
发布日期:2022-02-18
作者简介:曹阳(1971-),男,河南人,研究员,研究方向为棉花遗传育种,(E-mail) 1725235568@qq.com
基金资助:
CAO Yang1(
), YAN Yuping1, ZHU Bo1, FENG Zhenxiu1, ZHOU Xiaofeng2, LÜ Bo3, ZHANG Yan1, FANG Rui1
Received:2021-01-25
Published:2022-01-20
Online:2022-02-18
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】研究种质性状分布及变异特点,筛选出核心资源,选育出符合新疆棉花产业需求的品种。【方法】以保存396份陆地棉品种资源为材料,采用田间鉴定方法,分析6个表型生育性状、6个经济学性状、5个纤维品质性状及田间黄萎病变异及分布。【结果】供试陆地棉种质具有丰富的遗传多样性,生育期在116~125 d适宜范围的占51.8%; 60.0 cm以上较高株型的材料较少,占比17.9%;始果节高度在20.0 cm以上占比39.9%,可满足新疆机采棉采收需求;铃重以5.0~5.4 g居多,占总数39.4%;衣分整体较高,超过40%的占68.7%;产量差异大,籽棉以4 501~5 250 kg/hm2较多,占总数28.0%,皮棉2 400 kg/hm2以上高产种质占20.0%。发病高峰平均校正病指22.9,病指10.0以下的有73份,10.0~20.0的有125份;纤维长度30.0 mm以上占36.7%,马克隆值 3.7~4.2(A级)占比33.6%,比强度30.0 cN/tex以上占比69.2%,其中超过32.0 cN/tex有104个,占总数26.3%。生育性状变异程度,空果枝数>始果节高>株高>果枝数>始果节位>生育期;经济性状变异程度,皮棉产量>籽棉产量>单株铃数>铃重>籽指>衣分;纤维品质变异程度,比强度>马克隆值>纤维长度,整齐度和伸长率变异很小,变异系数分别为1.21%、1.87%;各种质间黄萎病变异系数高,可选抗病种质利用。【结论】鉴定出红叶材料1份、鸡脚叶材料3份、无酚材料2份及高比强等特异资源。筛选出新陆早82号、新陆早61号、鲁K638等16份品质与产量等性状匹配的、不同地域来源的优异种质。
中图分类号:
曹阳, 严玉萍, 朱波, 冯振秀, 周小凤, 吕博, 张燕, 方瑞. 棉花种质综合性状鉴定及资源利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 30-38.
CAO Yang, YAN Yuping, ZHU Bo, FENG Zhenxiu, ZHOU Xiaofeng, LÜ Bo, ZHANG Yan, FANG Rui. Comprehensive Traits Identification and Resource Utilization Analysis of Cotton Germplasm[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 30-38.
| 株高Plant height(cm) | 30.0~39.9 | 40.0~49.9 | 50.0~59.9 | 60.0~69.9 | 70.0~79.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 品种数Number of varieties | 4 | 114 | 207 | 69 | 2 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 1.0 | 28.8 | 52.3 | 17.4 | 0.5 |
| 果枝数(个)Fruit branch number | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 | 8.0~8.9 | 9.0~9.9 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 23 | 109 | 169 | 89 | 6 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 5.8 | 27.5 | 42.7 | 22.5 | 1.5 |
| 始果节位First fruit node position | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 3 | 43 | 237 | 107 | 6 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 0.8 | 10.9 | 59.8 | 27.0 | 1.5 |
| 始果节高度First fruit node height(cm) | ≤10 | 10.1~15.0 | 15.1~20.0 | 20.1~25.0 | 25.1~30.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 1 | 40 | 197 | 146 | 12 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 0.3 | 10.1 | 49.7 | 36.9 | 3.0 |
| 空果枝数(个)Empty fruit branch number | 0~0.9 | 1.0~1.9 | 2.0~2.9 | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 15 | 137 | 178 | 57 | 9 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 3.8 | 34.6 | 44.9 | 14.4 | 2.3 |
| 单株铃数(个)Boll number per plant | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | ≥7.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 24 | 83 | 154 | 90 | 45 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 6.1 | 21.0 | 38.9 | 22.7 | 11.4 |
表1 主要表型性状分布
Table 1 Distribution of main phenotypic characters
| 株高Plant height(cm) | 30.0~39.9 | 40.0~49.9 | 50.0~59.9 | 60.0~69.9 | 70.0~79.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 品种数Number of varieties | 4 | 114 | 207 | 69 | 2 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 1.0 | 28.8 | 52.3 | 17.4 | 0.5 |
| 果枝数(个)Fruit branch number | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 | 8.0~8.9 | 9.0~9.9 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 23 | 109 | 169 | 89 | 6 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 5.8 | 27.5 | 42.7 | 22.5 | 1.5 |
| 始果节位First fruit node position | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 3 | 43 | 237 | 107 | 6 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 0.8 | 10.9 | 59.8 | 27.0 | 1.5 |
| 始果节高度First fruit node height(cm) | ≤10 | 10.1~15.0 | 15.1~20.0 | 20.1~25.0 | 25.1~30.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 1 | 40 | 197 | 146 | 12 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 0.3 | 10.1 | 49.7 | 36.9 | 3.0 |
| 空果枝数(个)Empty fruit branch number | 0~0.9 | 1.0~1.9 | 2.0~2.9 | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 15 | 137 | 178 | 57 | 9 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 3.8 | 34.6 | 44.9 | 14.4 | 2.3 |
| 单株铃数(个)Boll number per plant | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | ≥7.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 24 | 83 | 154 | 90 | 45 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 6.1 | 21.0 | 38.9 | 22.7 | 11.4 |
| 铃重Boll weight | 衣分Lint percentage | 籽指Seed index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (%) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) |
| <4.0 | 8 | 2.0 | <35.0 | 22 | 5.6 | 8.0~8.9.0 | 13 | 3.3 |
| 4.0~4.4 | 41 | 10.4 | 35.1~37.9 | 43 | 10.9 | 9.0~9.9 | 90 | 22.7 |
| 4.5~4.9 | 112 | 28.3 | 38.0~39.9 | 59 | 14.9 | 10.0~10.9 | 183 | 46.2 |
| 5.0~5.4 | 156 | 39.4 | 40.0~41.9 | 95 | 24.0 | 11.0~11.9 | 88 | 22.2 |
| 5.5~5.9 | 68 | 17.2 | 42.0~43.9 | 121 | 30.6 | 12.0~12.9 | 15 | 3.8 |
| 6.0~6.4 | 10 | 2.5 | 44.0~45.9 | 46 | 11.6 | 13.0~13.9 | 4 | 1.0 |
| ≥6.5 | 1 | 0.3 | ≥46.0 | 10 | 2.5 | ≥14 | 3 | 0.8 |
表2 室内考种性状分布
Table 2 Distribution of characters in seed examination
| 铃重Boll weight | 衣分Lint percentage | 籽指Seed index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (%) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) |
| <4.0 | 8 | 2.0 | <35.0 | 22 | 5.6 | 8.0~8.9.0 | 13 | 3.3 |
| 4.0~4.4 | 41 | 10.4 | 35.1~37.9 | 43 | 10.9 | 9.0~9.9 | 90 | 22.7 |
| 4.5~4.9 | 112 | 28.3 | 38.0~39.9 | 59 | 14.9 | 10.0~10.9 | 183 | 46.2 |
| 5.0~5.4 | 156 | 39.4 | 40.0~41.9 | 95 | 24.0 | 11.0~11.9 | 88 | 22.2 |
| 5.5~5.9 | 68 | 17.2 | 42.0~43.9 | 121 | 30.6 | 12.0~12.9 | 15 | 3.8 |
| 6.0~6.4 | 10 | 2.5 | 44.0~45.9 | 46 | 11.6 | 13.0~13.9 | 4 | 1.0 |
| ≥6.5 | 1 | 0.3 | ≥46.0 | 10 | 2.5 | ≥14 | 3 | 0.8 |
| 籽棉产量Seed cotton yield | 皮棉产量Lint yield | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) | 平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) |
| <2 250 | 3 | 0.8 | <1 050 | 9 | 2.3 |
| 2 250~3 000 | 10 | 2.5 | 1 051~1 500 | 61 | 15.4 |
| 3 001~3 750 | 47 | 11.9 | 1 501~1 800 | 85 | 21.5 |
| 3 751~4 500 | 100 | 25.3 | 1 801~2 100 | 97 | 24.5 |
| 4 501~5 250 | 111 | 28.0 | 2 101~2 400 | 61 | 15.4 |
| 5 251~6 000 | 80 | 20.2 | 2 401~2 700 | 53 | 13.4 |
| 6 001~6 750 | 28 | 7.1 | 2 701~3 000 | 15 | 3.8 |
| 6 751~7 500 | 9 | 2.3 | 3 001~3 300 | 11 | 2.8 |
| 7 501~8 250 | 5 | 1.3 | 3 301~3 750 | 2 | 0.5 |
| ≥8 251 | 3 | 0.8 | ≥3 751 | 2 | 0.5 |
表3 产量分布
Table 3 Distribution of yield
| 籽棉产量Seed cotton yield | 皮棉产量Lint yield | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) | 平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) |
| <2 250 | 3 | 0.8 | <1 050 | 9 | 2.3 |
| 2 250~3 000 | 10 | 2.5 | 1 051~1 500 | 61 | 15.4 |
| 3 001~3 750 | 47 | 11.9 | 1 501~1 800 | 85 | 21.5 |
| 3 751~4 500 | 100 | 25.3 | 1 801~2 100 | 97 | 24.5 |
| 4 501~5 250 | 111 | 28.0 | 2 101~2 400 | 61 | 15.4 |
| 5 251~6 000 | 80 | 20.2 | 2 401~2 700 | 53 | 13.4 |
| 6 001~6 750 | 28 | 7.1 | 2 701~3 000 | 15 | 3.8 |
| 6 751~7 500 | 9 | 2.3 | 3 001~3 300 | 11 | 2.8 |
| 7 501~8 250 | 5 | 1.3 | 3 301~3 750 | 2 | 0.5 |
| ≥8 251 | 3 | 0.8 | ≥3 751 | 2 | 0.5 |
| 调查时间 Investigation time | 项目 Project | 0 | 0.1~5.0 | 5.1~10.0 | 10.1~20.0 | 20.1~35.0 | ≥35.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6月底病指 Disease index at the end of June | 品种数 | 218 | 169 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 占总数(%) | 55.1 | 42.7 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8月底校正病指 Correction of disease index at the end of August | 品种数 | 5 | 21 | 47 | 125 | 127 | 71 |
| 占总数(%) | 1.3 | 5.3 | 11.9 | 31.6 | 32.1 | 17.9 |
表4 种质黄萎病病指分布
Table 4 Distribution of disease index of Verticillium wilt in the tested germplasm resources
| 调查时间 Investigation time | 项目 Project | 0 | 0.1~5.0 | 5.1~10.0 | 10.1~20.0 | 20.1~35.0 | ≥35.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6月底病指 Disease index at the end of June | 品种数 | 218 | 169 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 占总数(%) | 55.1 | 42.7 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8月底校正病指 Correction of disease index at the end of August | 品种数 | 5 | 21 | 47 | 125 | 127 | 71 |
| 占总数(%) | 1.3 | 5.3 | 11.9 | 31.6 | 32.1 | 17.9 |
| 纤维长度Fiber length(mm) | 22.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0-30.9 | 31.0~31.9 | 32.0~35.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 品种数Number of varieties | 52 | 199 | 98 | 35 | 12 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 13.1 | 50.3 | 24.7 | 8.8 | 3.0 |
| 整齐度Uniformity(%) | <77.0 | 77.0~79.9 | 80.0~82.9 | 83.0~85.9 | ≥86.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 0 | 0 | 6 | 220 | 170 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 55.6 | 42.9 |
| 马克隆值Micronaire value | 3.7~4.2 | 3.5~3.6 | 4.3~4.9 | 3.4及以下 | 5.0及以上 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 133 | 13 | 219 | 9 | 22 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 33.6 | 3.3 | 55.3 | 2.3 | 5.6 |
| 比强度Fiber strength(cN/tex) | 20.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0~31.9 | 32.0~33.9 | ≥34.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 45 | 77 | 73 | 97 | 104 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 11.4 | 19.4 | 18.4 | 24.5 | 26.3 |
| 伸长率Elongation(%) | ≤6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.9 | ≥7.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 21 | 50 | 126 | 109 | 90 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 5.3 | 12.6 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 22.7 |
表5 纤维品质性状分布
Table 5 Distribution table of fiber quality characters
| 纤维长度Fiber length(mm) | 22.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0-30.9 | 31.0~31.9 | 32.0~35.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 品种数Number of varieties | 52 | 199 | 98 | 35 | 12 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 13.1 | 50.3 | 24.7 | 8.8 | 3.0 |
| 整齐度Uniformity(%) | <77.0 | 77.0~79.9 | 80.0~82.9 | 83.0~85.9 | ≥86.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 0 | 0 | 6 | 220 | 170 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 55.6 | 42.9 |
| 马克隆值Micronaire value | 3.7~4.2 | 3.5~3.6 | 4.3~4.9 | 3.4及以下 | 5.0及以上 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 133 | 13 | 219 | 9 | 22 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 33.6 | 3.3 | 55.3 | 2.3 | 5.6 |
| 比强度Fiber strength(cN/tex) | 20.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0~31.9 | 32.0~33.9 | ≥34.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 45 | 77 | 73 | 97 | 104 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 11.4 | 19.4 | 18.4 | 24.5 | 26.3 |
| 伸长率Elongation(%) | ≤6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.9 | ≥7.0 |
| 品种数Number of varieties | 21 | 50 | 126 | 109 | 90 |
| 占总数Percentage(%) | 5.3 | 12.6 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 22.7 |
| 种质名称 Germplasm name | 生育期 Growth period (d) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 纤维长度 Fiber length (mm) | 马值隆值 Micronaire value | 比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 校正病指 Corrected disease index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新陆早82号(Y17) | 119 | 42.7 | 3 871.5 | 28.7 | 4.3 | 32.7 | 19.7 |
| K2725 | 118 | 45.5 | 3 471.0 | 29.5 | 4.3 | 31.8 | 8.9 |
| 石K14 | 117 | 40.6 | 3 387.8 | 29.6 | 4.4 | 32.6 | 18.7 |
| 鲁K638 | 130 | 42.8 | 3 222.0 | 28.5 | 5.2 | 29.3 | 0.0 |
| JF-2 | 121 | 40.4 | 3 180.0 | 32.3 | 3.8 | 36.9 | 2.4 |
| 新陆早61号 | 121 | 43.1 | 3 153.8 | 30.4 | 4.2 | 35.6 | 5.2 |
| 国欣棉3号 | 129 | 41.6 | 3 134.3 | 30.8 | 4.7 | 32.9 | 16.2 |
| SW1 | 123 | 42.7 | 3 111.0 | 29.9 | 3.8 | 37.1 | 12.5 |
| G2-2-5 | 123 | 41.4 | 3 054.8 | 32.0 | 4.3 | 39.2 | 1.0 |
| 晋棉36号 | 121 | 44.2 | 2 861.3 | 28.8 | 4.8 | 31.0 | 11.9 |
| B4-23 | 125 | 44.5 | 2 840.3 | 30.2 | 4.6 | 33.2 | 4.6 |
| 光叶岱字棉 | 119 | 43.6 | 2 827.5 | 30.0 | 4.2 | 37.0 | 15.3 |
| 新陆中15号 | 126 | 42.4 | 2 739.0 | 29.5 | 4.1 | 35.2 | 18.5 |
| 新陆中42号 | 120 | 42.8 | 2 716.5 | 29.5 | 4.0 | 32.0 | 11.2 |
| 邯棉885 | 130 | 43.4 | 2 675.3 | 30.9 | 4.4 | 34.7 | 17.0 |
| 豫棉20 | 128 | 41.4 | 2 625.0 | 30.6 | 4.2 | 32.0 | 6.7 |
表6 筛选出的16份优异种质主要性状
Table 6 Results of main traits of the 16 selected excellent germplasm
| 种质名称 Germplasm name | 生育期 Growth period (d) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 纤维长度 Fiber length (mm) | 马值隆值 Micronaire value | 比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 校正病指 Corrected disease index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新陆早82号(Y17) | 119 | 42.7 | 3 871.5 | 28.7 | 4.3 | 32.7 | 19.7 |
| K2725 | 118 | 45.5 | 3 471.0 | 29.5 | 4.3 | 31.8 | 8.9 |
| 石K14 | 117 | 40.6 | 3 387.8 | 29.6 | 4.4 | 32.6 | 18.7 |
| 鲁K638 | 130 | 42.8 | 3 222.0 | 28.5 | 5.2 | 29.3 | 0.0 |
| JF-2 | 121 | 40.4 | 3 180.0 | 32.3 | 3.8 | 36.9 | 2.4 |
| 新陆早61号 | 121 | 43.1 | 3 153.8 | 30.4 | 4.2 | 35.6 | 5.2 |
| 国欣棉3号 | 129 | 41.6 | 3 134.3 | 30.8 | 4.7 | 32.9 | 16.2 |
| SW1 | 123 | 42.7 | 3 111.0 | 29.9 | 3.8 | 37.1 | 12.5 |
| G2-2-5 | 123 | 41.4 | 3 054.8 | 32.0 | 4.3 | 39.2 | 1.0 |
| 晋棉36号 | 121 | 44.2 | 2 861.3 | 28.8 | 4.8 | 31.0 | 11.9 |
| B4-23 | 125 | 44.5 | 2 840.3 | 30.2 | 4.6 | 33.2 | 4.6 |
| 光叶岱字棉 | 119 | 43.6 | 2 827.5 | 30.0 | 4.2 | 37.0 | 15.3 |
| 新陆中15号 | 126 | 42.4 | 2 739.0 | 29.5 | 4.1 | 35.2 | 18.5 |
| 新陆中42号 | 120 | 42.8 | 2 716.5 | 29.5 | 4.0 | 32.0 | 11.2 |
| 邯棉885 | 130 | 43.4 | 2 675.3 | 30.9 | 4.4 | 34.7 | 17.0 |
| 豫棉20 | 128 | 41.4 | 2 625.0 | 30.6 | 4.2 | 32.0 | 6.7 |
| [1] | 刘剑光, 赵君, 吴巧娟, 等. 棉花新种质系的性状鉴定与育种利用评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(4):1414-1418. |
| LIU Qianguang, ZHAO Jun, WU Qiaojuan. Identification and Appraisal on Characters of New Germplasm Lines in Upland Cotton[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(4):1414-1418. | |
| [2] | 杜雄明, 刘方, 王坤波, 等. 棉花种质资源收集鉴定与创新利用[J]. 棉花学报, 2017,(z1):51-61. |
| DU Xiongming, LIU Fang, WANG Kunbo. Collection, Evaluation and Utilization of Cotton Germplasm[J]. Cotton Science, 2017,(z1):51-61. | |
| [3] | 孙君灵, 周忠丽, 贾银华, 等. “十一五”棉花优异创新种质简介[J]. 江西棉花, 2011, 33(4):55-57. |
| SUN Junling, ZHOU Zhongli, JIA Yinhua, et al. Brief introduction of excellent and innovative Cotton Germplasm during the Eleventh five-year Plan[J]. Jiangxi Cotton, 2011, 33(4):55-57. | |
| [4] | 卢新雄, 辛霞, 刘旭. 作物种质资源安全保存原理与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019. |
| LU Xinxiong, XIN Xia, LIU XU, Principle and Technology of safe Preservation of crop Germplasm Resources [M]. Beijing: science Press, 2019. | |
| [5] | 喻树迅. 我国棉花遗传育种进展与展望[J]. 棉花学报, 2003, 15(2):120-124. |
| YU Shuxun. The Evolutions and Prospect of Cotton Genetics and Breeding in China[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2003, 15(2):120-124. | |
| [6] | 曹阳, 严玉萍, 朱波, 等. 棉花核心种质的创制及性状鉴定研究[J]. 绿洲农业科学与工程, 2018, 4(1):3-10. |
| CAO Yang, YAN Yuping, ZHU Bo, et al. Study on the Establishment and character Identification of Cotton Core Collection[J]. Oasis Agriculture Science and Engineering, 2018, 4(1):3-10. | |
| [7] | 胡玉枢. 辽宁棉花种质资源研究思路与方法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2016,(4):42-45. |
| HU Yushu. Research ideas and methods of Cotton Germplasm Resources in Liaoning Province[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences | |
| [8] | 吴香华, 肖水平, 孙亮庆, 等. 江西新引进棉花种质资源的鉴定与筛选[J]. 江西棉花, 2011, 33(4):19-24. |
| WU Xianghua, XIAO Shuiping, SUN Liangqin, et al. Identification and Screening of the Newly Introduced Cotton Germplasm Resources in Jiangxi Province[J]. Jiangxi Cotton, 2011, 33(4):19-24. | |
| [9] | 王林辉, 余正军, 刘少卿, 等. 27个棉花育种材料的产量度部分纤堆品质差异分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 35(1):9-12. |
| WANG Linhui, YU Zhengjun, LIU Shaoqing, et al. Differences analysis on yield and fiber quality of 27 cotton varieties[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences Ed.), 2009, 35(1):9-12. | |
| [10] |
石志钰, 裴雅琨, 朱玉涛, 等. 基于数字图像棉花黄萎病诊断与防治的管理远程监测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6):1166-1174.
DOI |
|
SHI Zhiyu, FEI Yakun, ZHU Yutao, et al. Study on remote monitoring of cotton verticillium wilt diagnosis and control management based on digital image[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6):1166-1174.
DOI |
|
| [11] | 张文蔚, 赵磊, 王升正, 等. 10个棉花品种(系)田间人工病圃黄萎病抗性稳定性分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2012, 39(5);20-22. |
| ZHANG Wenwei, ZHAO Lei, WANG Shengzheng, et al. Stability Analysis on Verticillium Wilt Resistance of Ten Cotton Cultivars in Disease Nursery[J]. China Cotton, 2012, 39(5);20-22. | |
| [12] | 杜雄明, 周忠丽. 棉花种质资源调查标准和描述规范[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
| DU Xiongming, ZHOU Zhongli. Investigation Standard and description Standard of Cotton Germplasm Resources [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. | |
| [13] | 王爱玉, 赵金辉, 王志伟, 等. 抗虫棉数量性状的相关及通径分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(9):24-26. |
| WANG Aiyu, ZHAO Jinhui, WANG Zhiwei, et al. Correlation and Path Analysis of Quantitative Traits in Insect-Resistant Cotton[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 46(9):24-26. | |
| [14] | 潘存祥, 许勇, 纪海波, 等. 西瓜种质资源表型多样性及聚类分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(1):59-63. |
| PAN Cunxiang, XU Yong, JI Haibo, et al. Phenotypic Diversity and Clustering Analysis of Watermelon Germplasm[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(1):59-63. | |
| [15] | 曹阳, 严玉萍, 冯振秀, 等. 棉花F1性状与亲本关系分析[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(4):28-31. |
| CAO Yang, YAN Yuping, GENG Zhenxiu, et al. Analysis on relationship of cotton traits between F1 hybrid and parents[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 41(4):28-31. | |
| [16] | 孙振纲, 姜艳丽, 陈耕, 等. 山西陆地棉品种资源农艺性状鉴定结果分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(12):15-16,19. |
| SUN Zhengan, JIANG Yanli, CHEN Gen, et al. Analysis on Identification Results of Agronomical Characters of Cotton Germplasm Resources in Shanxi Province[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(12):15-16,19. | |
| [17] | 田琴, 司爱君, 陈红, 等. 新陆早系列棉花品种产量性状与品质性状的相关性[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(2):1-4. |
| TIAN Qin, SHI Aijun, CHEN Hong, et al. Correlation between Yield and Quality Trait of Xinluzao Series Cotton Varieties[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(2):1-4. | |
| [18] | 张冬梅, 张艳军, 李存东, 等. 论棉花轻简化栽培[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(2):163-168. |
| ZHANG Dongmei, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Cundong, et al. On Light and Simplified Cotton Cultivation[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(2):163-168. | |
| [19] | 谢标洪, 孔令甲, 邱新平, 等. 棉花种质资源和品种(系)的抗黄萎病性鉴定[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2001, 47(4):23-24. |
| XIE Biaohong, KONG Lingjia, QIU Xinping, et al. Identification of Resistance to Verticillium Wilt of Cotton Germplasm Resources and varieties (Lines)[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2001, 47(4):23-24. | |
| [20] | 陈志宏, 李新一, 王加亭, 等. 中国苜蓿种质资源保护及创新利用[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(5):59-63. |
| CHEN Zhihong, LI Xinyi, WANG Jiating, et al. Conservation and Innovative Utilization of Alfalfa Germplasm Resources in China[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(5):59-63. | |
| [21] | 熊宗伟, 王雪姣, 顾生浩, 等. 中国主产棉区气象因子和纤维品质的相关性研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(2):95-104. |
| XIONG Zhongwei, WANG Xuejiao, GU Shenghao, et al. Correlation between Meteorological Factors and Cotton Fiber Quality in Major Cotton-producing Region of China[J]. Cotton Science, 2014, 26(2):95-104. |
| [1] | 苗红萍, 王晓伟, 田聪华, 李志, 张玉新, 戴俊生. 塔里木河流域棉花生产与布局演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
| [2] | 王俊铎, 崔豫疆, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产优势区域分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
| [3] | 郑巨云, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 耿世伟, 孙丰磊, 阳妮, 李雪源, 王俊铎. 新疆机采棉花生产关键技术模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
| [4] | 李杰, 刘佳, 王亮, 张娜, 杨延龙, 郑子漂, 魏鑫, 王萌, 周子馨, 阳妮, 龚照龙, 侯献飞, 黄启秀, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 张济鹏, 张鹏忠. “棉、油、糖”科技成果转化现状及应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
| [5] | 扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
| [6] | 李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
| [7] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
| [8] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
| [9] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
| [10] | 王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
| [11] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
| [12] | 田海燕, 张占琴, 颉建辉, 王建江, 杨相昆. 加工番茄果实番茄红素与主要品质性状的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
| [13] | 张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
| [14] | 陈勇, 周蕾, 隋春, 蔺彩霞. 32份板蓝根栽培种质在新疆产区的性状表现[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
| [15] | 董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||