

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 1507-1516.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.06.023
何孟竹1,2(
), 王静文1,2, 谢好杰3, 朱晓锋2, 路伟1,4(
), 李海强2(
)
收稿日期:2024-11-05
出版日期:2025-06-20
发布日期:2025-07-29
通信作者:
路伟(1984- ),男,新疆石河子人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为棉花害虫绿色防控,E-mail:teerakon@sina.com;作者简介:何孟竹(1995- ),男,安徽宣城人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花害虫综合治理,(E-mail)1475138106@qq.com
基金资助:
HE Mengzhu1,2(
), WANG Jingwen1,2, XIE Haojie3, ZHU Xiaofeng2, LU Wei1,4(
), LI Haiqiang2(
)
Received:2024-11-05
Published:2025-06-20
Online:2025-07-29
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】筛选出适合新疆南疆阿克苏地区棉花生产上防控棉叶螨的药剂,对棉叶螨进行有效防控。【方法】通过对南疆阿克苏地区主要叶螨截形叶螨Tetranychus truncatus、敦煌叶螨Tetranychus dunchuangensis 开展田间药效试验,分析9种药剂对新疆阿克苏地区棉叶螨的药效情况。【结果】敦煌叶螨药后3 d 30% 乙唑螨腈悬浮剂、24% 联肼· 螺螨酯悬浮剂、40% 稻丰· 仲丁威乳油剂均效果较好,其中30% 乙唑螨腈悬浮剂稀释3 000倍后防效达到了97.21%,另外10% 阿维菌素悬浮剂稀释2 000倍后在药后5 d 时防效达到了98.13%,显著性高于其他8种药剂的防效;在防治棉田截形叶螨时,药后3 d 10.5% 阿维· 哒螨灵微乳剂、22.4% 螺虫乙酯悬浮剂均较好的效果较佳,其中10.5% 阿维· 哒螨灵微乳剂稀释2 500倍后防效达到了91.16%,显著性高于其他7种药剂的防效。【结论】在棉叶螨发生初期,在生产上轮换使用40% 稻丰· 仲丁威乳油剂、24% 联肼· 螺螨酯悬浮剂、30% 乙唑螨腈悬浮剂、10% 阿维菌素悬浮剂这4种药剂防治敦煌叶螨,轮换使用10.5% 阿维· 哒螨灵微乳剂、22.4% 螺虫乙酯悬浮剂2种药剂防治截形叶螨。
中图分类号:
何孟竹, 王静文, 谢好杰, 朱晓锋, 路伟, 李海强. 9种杀螨剂对棉叶螨田间防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(6): 1507-1516.
HE Mengzhu, WANG Jingwen, XIE Haojie, ZHU Xiaofeng, LU Wei, LI Haiqiang. Evaluate on the field control efficacy of nine Acaricides against cotton spider mite[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1507-1516.
| 药剂 Chemicals | 有效成分及含量 Active ingredients and content | 稀释倍数 Dilution factor | 生产厂家 Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20%甲氰菊酯乳油剂 | 甲氰菊酯20% | 1 000 | 台州市大鹏药业有限公司 |
| 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 | 阿维菌素10% | 2 000 | 南京南农农药科技发展有限公司 |
| 40%稻丰·仲丁威乳油剂 | 稻丰散:18%;仲丁威:22% | 133 | 广东大丰植保科技有限公司 |
| 30%乙唑螨腈悬浮剂 | 乙唑螨腈30% | 3 000 | 沈阳科创化学品有限公司 |
| 22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 | 螺虫乙酯22.4% | 4 000 | 河南勇冠乔迪农业科技有限公司 |
| 10.5%阿维·哒螨灵微乳剂 | 哒螨灵10%;阿维菌素0.5% | 2 500 | 河南今越生物技术有限公司 |
| 30.0%苯丁·联苯肼悬浮剂 | 联苯肼酯15%;苯丁锡15% | 2 000 | 陕西上格之路生物科学有限公司 |
| 24.0%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 | 联苯肼酯16%;螺螨酯8% | 2 000 | 湖南农大海特农化有限公司 |
| 23% 阿维·乙螨唑悬浮剂 | 阿维菌素3%;乙螨唑20% | 8 000 | 山东中新科农生物科技有限公司 |
表1 供验药剂有效成分、含量及其稀释倍数
Tab.1 The active ingredients and contents of the test agents along with their dilution factors
| 药剂 Chemicals | 有效成分及含量 Active ingredients and content | 稀释倍数 Dilution factor | 生产厂家 Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20%甲氰菊酯乳油剂 | 甲氰菊酯20% | 1 000 | 台州市大鹏药业有限公司 |
| 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 | 阿维菌素10% | 2 000 | 南京南农农药科技发展有限公司 |
| 40%稻丰·仲丁威乳油剂 | 稻丰散:18%;仲丁威:22% | 133 | 广东大丰植保科技有限公司 |
| 30%乙唑螨腈悬浮剂 | 乙唑螨腈30% | 3 000 | 沈阳科创化学品有限公司 |
| 22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 | 螺虫乙酯22.4% | 4 000 | 河南勇冠乔迪农业科技有限公司 |
| 10.5%阿维·哒螨灵微乳剂 | 哒螨灵10%;阿维菌素0.5% | 2 500 | 河南今越生物技术有限公司 |
| 30.0%苯丁·联苯肼悬浮剂 | 联苯肼酯15%;苯丁锡15% | 2 000 | 陕西上格之路生物科学有限公司 |
| 24.0%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 | 联苯肼酯16%;螺螨酯8% | 2 000 | 湖南农大海特农化有限公司 |
| 23% 阿维·乙螨唑悬浮剂 | 阿维菌素3%;乙螨唑20% | 8 000 | 山东中新科农生物科技有限公司 |
| 药剂 Chemicals | 药后1 d 1 day after medication | 药后3 d 3 day after medication | 药后5 d 5 day after medication | 药后7 d 7 day after medication | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | |
| 20%甲氰菊酯乳油剂 20.0% fenpropathrine mulsifiable concentrates | 86.69±0.25cd | 86.79±0.40cd | 91.57±1.41abc | 91.05±1.14c | 92.77±1.96a | 91.35±1.71b | 74.70±1.95ab | 66.95±1.87b |
| 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% Avermectin suspension | 81.23±0.72de | 81.30±1.26de | 78.13±0.93e | 76.77±0.79f | 98.44±0.07a | 98.13±0.08a | 82.81±1.30a | 77.55±1.15a |
| 40%稻丰·仲丁威乳油剂 40% Phenthoate Fenobucarb emulsifiable concentrates | 97.18±0.52a | 97.20±0.50a | 95.19±0.54ab | 94.89±0.43b | 93.05±1.92a | 91.68±1.66b | 81.28±2.91a | 75.55±2.44a |
| 30%乙唑螨腈悬浮剂 30% Tolfenpyrad suspension | 76.29±2.48ef | 76.39±2.75ef | 97.37±1.04a | 97.21±0.77a | 76.32±4.65b | 71.67±4.12d | 77.63±9.35b | 70.78±7.90b |
| 22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 22.4% spirotetramat ethyl ester suspension | 85.73±0.75cd | 85.79±1.08cd | 87.14±3.11bc | 86.35±2.36d | 88.57±1.72a | 86.33±1.40c | 62.86±2.28b | 51.47±1.52c |
| 10.5%阿维·哒螨灵悬浮剂 10.5% Abamectin pyridaben water-soluble | 90.97±0.90bc | 91.01±0.99bc | 81.82±3.45cd | 80.69±2.24e | 70.45±5.09b | 64.66±4.45d | 38.64±4.90c | 19.83±3.83e |
| 30%苯丁·联苯肼悬浮剂 30% Fenbutatin oxide bifenazate Suspension | 71.24±3.62f | 71.38±3.88f | 88.52±1.78abc | 87.82±1.50c | 77.05±2.93b | 72.55±2.57d | 68.85±1.47b | 59.31±1.41d |
| 24%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 24% Bifenazate spiralate suspension | 94.93±1.91ab | 94.91±1.94ab | 94.94±0.79ab | 94.62±0.40b | 89.87±1.72a | 87.89±1.40c | 70.89±3.03b | 61.96±2.63d |
| 23%阿维·乙螨唑悬浮剂 23% Avermectin etoxazole suspension | 90.99±1.01bc | 91.05±1.04bc | 90.91±1.58abc | 90.35±0.98c | 90.91±2.97a | 89.13±2.59c | 66.67±2.90b | 56.45±2.48d |
| CK | -0.99±0.17g | / | -5.82±0.47f | / | -16.40 ±1.12c | / | -23.46±1.95d | / |
表2 9种杀螨剂对棉田敦煌叶螨的田间防效
Tab.2 Field control effects of 9 acaricides on T. dunhuangensis in cotton fields
| 药剂 Chemicals | 药后1 d 1 day after medication | 药后3 d 3 day after medication | 药后5 d 5 day after medication | 药后7 d 7 day after medication | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | |
| 20%甲氰菊酯乳油剂 20.0% fenpropathrine mulsifiable concentrates | 86.69±0.25cd | 86.79±0.40cd | 91.57±1.41abc | 91.05±1.14c | 92.77±1.96a | 91.35±1.71b | 74.70±1.95ab | 66.95±1.87b |
| 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% Avermectin suspension | 81.23±0.72de | 81.30±1.26de | 78.13±0.93e | 76.77±0.79f | 98.44±0.07a | 98.13±0.08a | 82.81±1.30a | 77.55±1.15a |
| 40%稻丰·仲丁威乳油剂 40% Phenthoate Fenobucarb emulsifiable concentrates | 97.18±0.52a | 97.20±0.50a | 95.19±0.54ab | 94.89±0.43b | 93.05±1.92a | 91.68±1.66b | 81.28±2.91a | 75.55±2.44a |
| 30%乙唑螨腈悬浮剂 30% Tolfenpyrad suspension | 76.29±2.48ef | 76.39±2.75ef | 97.37±1.04a | 97.21±0.77a | 76.32±4.65b | 71.67±4.12d | 77.63±9.35b | 70.78±7.90b |
| 22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 22.4% spirotetramat ethyl ester suspension | 85.73±0.75cd | 85.79±1.08cd | 87.14±3.11bc | 86.35±2.36d | 88.57±1.72a | 86.33±1.40c | 62.86±2.28b | 51.47±1.52c |
| 10.5%阿维·哒螨灵悬浮剂 10.5% Abamectin pyridaben water-soluble | 90.97±0.90bc | 91.01±0.99bc | 81.82±3.45cd | 80.69±2.24e | 70.45±5.09b | 64.66±4.45d | 38.64±4.90c | 19.83±3.83e |
| 30%苯丁·联苯肼悬浮剂 30% Fenbutatin oxide bifenazate Suspension | 71.24±3.62f | 71.38±3.88f | 88.52±1.78abc | 87.82±1.50c | 77.05±2.93b | 72.55±2.57d | 68.85±1.47b | 59.31±1.41d |
| 24%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 24% Bifenazate spiralate suspension | 94.93±1.91ab | 94.91±1.94ab | 94.94±0.79ab | 94.62±0.40b | 89.87±1.72a | 87.89±1.40c | 70.89±3.03b | 61.96±2.63d |
| 23%阿维·乙螨唑悬浮剂 23% Avermectin etoxazole suspension | 90.99±1.01bc | 91.05±1.04bc | 90.91±1.58abc | 90.35±0.98c | 90.91±2.97a | 89.13±2.59c | 66.67±2.90b | 56.45±2.48d |
| CK | -0.99±0.17g | / | -5.82±0.47f | / | -16.40 ±1.12c | / | -23.46±1.95d | / |
图1 药后1、3、5、7 d 不同药剂对敦煌叶螨的防治效果 注:A表示药后1 d的防治效果、B表示药后3 d的防治效果、C表示药后5 d的防治效果、D表示药后7 d的防治效果,下同
Fig.1 Control effects of different pesticides on T. dunhuangensis at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after treatment Notes: In the figure, 1 day represents the prevention and control effect after 1 day of medication, 3 days represents the prevention and control effect after 3 days of medication, 5 days represents the prevention and control effect after 5 days of medication, and 7 days represents the prevention and control effect after 7 days of medication,the same as below
| 药剂 Chemicals | 药后1 d 1 day after medication | 药后3 d 3 day after medication | 药后5 d 5 day after medication | 药后7 d 7 day after medication | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | |
| 20%甲氰菊酯乳油剂 20.0% fenpropathrine mulsifiable concentrates | 91.07±0.40abc | 90.86±0.44ab | 77.96±1.18bc | 81.04±1.19c | 69.49±1.64a | 72.30±0.51ab | 70.19±1.40ab | 73.26±0.79ab |
| 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% Avermectin suspension | 88.09±0.34cd | 87.89±0.43b | 73.33±1.71c | 77.06±1.95e | 47.66±2.04b | 52.48±1.53c | 55.89±2.11cd | 60.44±0.84cd |
| 40%稻丰·仲丁威乳油剂 40% Phenthoate Fenobucarb emulsifiable concentrates | 89.02±0.63bc | 89.00±0.59b | 78.26±2.69bc | 81.30±2.40c | 65.76±3.27a | 68.92±2.37b | 53.91±3.79cd | 58.67±2.46cd |
| 30%乙唑螨腈悬浮剂 30% Tolfenpyrad suspension | 88.14±0.99cd | 88.03±0.85b | 82.61±0.64ab | 85.04±0.97b | 68.87±1.07a | 71.74±0.88b | 77.63±0.65a | 79.94±0.37a |
| 22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 22.4% spirotetramat ethyl ester suspension | 83.75±1.45e | 83.85±1.30c | 88.70±0.91a | 90.28±0.66a | 69.35±2.11a | 72.17±1.51ab | 52.63±3.29cd | 57.52±1.96cd |
| 10.5%阿维·哒螨灵悬浮剂 10.5% Abamectin pyridaben water-soluble | 92.49±0.40ab | 92.35±0.47a | 89.72±0.96a | 91.16±0.83a | 69.43±2.23a | 72.25±1.28ab | 64.43±4.40bc | 68.10±3.08bc |
| 30%苯丁·联苯肼悬浮剂 30% Fenbutatin oxide bifenazate Suspension | 85.22±0.39de | 84.80±0.48c | 85.31±2.58ab | 87.37±2.68b | 75.30±4.46a | 77.58±3.01a | 64.27±6.74bc | 67.95±5.29bc |
| 24%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 24% Bifenazate spiralate suspension | 92.83±0.59a | 92.87±0.51a | 75.61±2.27bc | 79.02±2.57d | 43.33±4.41b | 48.55±2.04d | 26.69±6.53e | 34.25±4.25e |
| 23%阿维·乙螨唑悬浮剂 23% Avermectin etoxazole suspension | 84.01±2.58e | 83.57±2.36c | 83.11±0.94ab | 85.47±1.41b | 49.78±2.76b | 54.40±1.40c | 49.18±3.18d | 54.42±1.89d |
| CK | 2.12±0.38f | / | -1.80±0.12d | / | -7.89±0.50c | / | -6.54±0.65f | / |
表3 9种杀螨剂对棉田截形叶螨的田间防效
Tab.3 Field control effects of 9 acaricides on T. truncatus in cotton fields
| 药剂 Chemicals | 药后1 d 1 day after medication | 药后3 d 3 day after medication | 药后5 d 5 day after medication | 药后7 d 7 day after medication | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | 虫口减退率 Pest Reduction Rate (%) | 防效 Control Efficacy (%) | |
| 20%甲氰菊酯乳油剂 20.0% fenpropathrine mulsifiable concentrates | 91.07±0.40abc | 90.86±0.44ab | 77.96±1.18bc | 81.04±1.19c | 69.49±1.64a | 72.30±0.51ab | 70.19±1.40ab | 73.26±0.79ab |
| 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% Avermectin suspension | 88.09±0.34cd | 87.89±0.43b | 73.33±1.71c | 77.06±1.95e | 47.66±2.04b | 52.48±1.53c | 55.89±2.11cd | 60.44±0.84cd |
| 40%稻丰·仲丁威乳油剂 40% Phenthoate Fenobucarb emulsifiable concentrates | 89.02±0.63bc | 89.00±0.59b | 78.26±2.69bc | 81.30±2.40c | 65.76±3.27a | 68.92±2.37b | 53.91±3.79cd | 58.67±2.46cd |
| 30%乙唑螨腈悬浮剂 30% Tolfenpyrad suspension | 88.14±0.99cd | 88.03±0.85b | 82.61±0.64ab | 85.04±0.97b | 68.87±1.07a | 71.74±0.88b | 77.63±0.65a | 79.94±0.37a |
| 22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 22.4% spirotetramat ethyl ester suspension | 83.75±1.45e | 83.85±1.30c | 88.70±0.91a | 90.28±0.66a | 69.35±2.11a | 72.17±1.51ab | 52.63±3.29cd | 57.52±1.96cd |
| 10.5%阿维·哒螨灵悬浮剂 10.5% Abamectin pyridaben water-soluble | 92.49±0.40ab | 92.35±0.47a | 89.72±0.96a | 91.16±0.83a | 69.43±2.23a | 72.25±1.28ab | 64.43±4.40bc | 68.10±3.08bc |
| 30%苯丁·联苯肼悬浮剂 30% Fenbutatin oxide bifenazate Suspension | 85.22±0.39de | 84.80±0.48c | 85.31±2.58ab | 87.37±2.68b | 75.30±4.46a | 77.58±3.01a | 64.27±6.74bc | 67.95±5.29bc |
| 24%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 24% Bifenazate spiralate suspension | 92.83±0.59a | 92.87±0.51a | 75.61±2.27bc | 79.02±2.57d | 43.33±4.41b | 48.55±2.04d | 26.69±6.53e | 34.25±4.25e |
| 23%阿维·乙螨唑悬浮剂 23% Avermectin etoxazole suspension | 84.01±2.58e | 83.57±2.36c | 83.11±0.94ab | 85.47±1.41b | 49.78±2.76b | 54.40±1.40c | 49.18±3.18d | 54.42±1.89d |
| CK | 2.12±0.38f | / | -1.80±0.12d | / | -7.89±0.50c | / | -6.54±0.65f | / |
| [1] | 李金叶. 新疆农业优势特色产业选择研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2007, 28(2): 181-184. |
| LI Jinye. On choices of agricultural characteristic advantage industry of Xinjiang[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2007, 28(2): 181-184. | |
| [2] | Boubou A, Migeon A, Roderick G K, et al. Recent emergence and worldwide spread of the red tomato spider mite, Tetranychus evansi: genetic variation and multiple cryptic invasions[J]. Biological Invasions, 2011, 13(1): 81-92. |
| [3] | Hong XY, Zhang ZQ, Li GQ. Tetranychidae of China: a review of progress, with a check list[C]. Xin Jie-Liu Centenary: Progress in Chinese Acarology. Zoosymposia, 2010, 4 (1): 133-157. |
| [4] | Yi T C, Ochoa R. Revision of Bryobiella Tuttle Baker (Acari, Tetranychidae), with ontogenetic development and redescription of B. desertorum[J]. Zootaxa, 2018, 4540(1): 93-131. |
| [5] | Kowsika S, Ramaraju K. Incidence and Report of Phytophagous Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)from Different Host Plants With Key to the Major Species in this Genus[J]. Trends in Biosciences, 2015, 8(11): 2969-2974. |
| [6] | 马广民. 朱砂叶螨取食诱导的棉花防御反应及其对棉蚜发育的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017. |
| MA Guangmin. Cotton defense response induced by Tetranychus cinnabarinus feeding and its influence on the development of cotton aphid[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2017. | |
| [7] | 李娟. 中国叶螨科分类修订及系统发育研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2020. |
| LI Juan. Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic study of Tetranychidae in China[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2020. | |
| [8] | 唐睿, 孙宪银, 卓富彦, 等. 近5年中国棉花主要病虫害发生演替及防控分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2208-2219. |
| TANG Rui, SUN Xianyin, ZHUO Fuyan, et al. Investigation and research on the dynamic occurrence of major crop diseases and pests and the succession of control strategy in China during 2015-2019[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2208-2219. | |
| [9] | 李贤超, 丁丽丽, 张强, 等. 2022年新疆生产建设兵团棉花主要病虫害发生趋势预测[J]. 中国棉花, 2022, 49(4): 1-2. |
| LI Xianchao, DING Lili, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Forecast on the occurrence trend of cotton diseases and insect pests in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in 2022[J]. China Cotton, 2022, 49(4): 1-2. | |
| [10] | 余璐, 张强, 李红. 2019年新疆兵团棉花主要病虫害发生特点及原因分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47 (2): 4-5,23. |
| YU Lu, ZHANG Qiang, Li Hong. Analysis of the Characteristics and Causes of Major Cotton Diseases and Pests in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in 2019[J]. Cotton, 2020, 47(2): 4-5,23. | |
| [11] | 何林, 赵志模, 邓新平, 等. 朱砂叶螨对3种杀螨剂的抗性选育及抗性治理研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, (4): 403-408. |
| HE Ling, ZHAO Zhimu, DENG Xinping, et al. A study on the resistance breeding and resistance management of Tetranychus cinnabarinus to three acaricides[J]. 2003, (4): 403-408. | |
| [12] | 江改青, 黄孟丽, 李雪银, 等. 江苏草莓二斑叶螨对5种杀螨剂的抗药性监测[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2023,(11): 98-103. |
| JIANG Gaiqing, HUANG Mengli, LI Xueyin, et al. Resistance monitoring of Tetranychus urticae Koch to five acaricides in Jiangsu Province[J]. China Vegetables, 2023,(11): 98-103. | |
| [13] | 林乾, 罗怿, 王小柯, 等. 6种药剂对柑橘全爪螨的室内毒力[J]. 农技服务, 2023, 40 (10): 66-68 |
| LIN Qian, LUO Yi, WANG Xiaoke, et al. Indoor toxicity of six pesticides Panonychus citri[J]. Agricultural Technology Services, 2023, 40 (10): 66-68. | |
| [14] | 马亚杰, 马小艳, 任相亮, 等. 不同杀螨剂对新疆棉田田间药效[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48 (2): 17-19,37 |
| MA Yajie, MA Xiaoyan, REN Xiangliang, et al. and others Field efficacy of different acaricides on Tetranychus turkestani in cotton field of Xinjiang[J]. Cotton, 2021, 48(2): 17-19,37. | |
| [15] | 董瑞, 徐丹丹, 李玉焕, 等. 不同药剂对二斑叶螨和截形叶螨的田间防效研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2024,(1): 96-100. |
| DONG Rui, XU Dandan, LI Yuhuan, et al. Field control efficacy of different pesticides to Tetranychus urticae and T. truncatus[J]. China Vegetables, 2024,(1): 96-100. | |
| [16] | 王慧芙, 金道超. 中国蜱螨学研究的回顾和展望[J]. 昆虫知识, 2000, 37(1): 36-41. |
| WANG Huifu, JIN Daochao. Review and prospect of Acari studies in China[J]. Entomological Knowledge, 2000, 37(1): 36-41. | |
| [17] | 郭文超, 许建军, 吐尔逊, 等. 新疆玉米害螨种类分布及危害的研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2001, 38 (4): 198-201. |
| GUO Wencao, XU Jianjun, Tuerxin, et al. A Study on the Distribution and Harm of Maize Mite Species in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2001, 38(4): 198-201. | |
| [18] | 洪晓月, 薛晓峰, 王进军, 等. 作物重要叶螨综合防控技术研究与示范推广[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2013, 50(2): 321-328. |
| HONG Xiaoyue, XUE Xiaofeng, WANG Jinjun, et al. Integrated control techniques for spider mites on important crops[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2013, 50(2): 321-328. | |
| [19] | 刘敏, 李永涛, 李婷, 等. 三唑锡亚致死浓度对土耳其斯坦叶螨运动速率的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2015, 52(3): 593-599. |
| LIU Min, LI Yongtao, LI Ting, et al. Effects of sub-lethal concentrations of Azocyclotin on the movement rates of Tetranychus turkestani (Ugarov et Nikolskii)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2015, 52(3): 593-599. | |
| [20] | 段祥坤, 李永涛, 陈林, 等. 新型杀螨剂丁氟螨酯对土耳其斯坦叶螨亚致死效应[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(2): 372-380. |
| DUAN Xiangkun, LI Yongtao, CHEN Lin, et al. Sublethal effects of a novel acaricide Cyflumetofen on Tetranychus turkestani[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2015, 37(2): 372-380. | |
| [21] | 郭艳兰, 焦旭东, 杨帅, 等. 和截形叶螨在不同寄主植物上的种群动态及寄主选择性[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2013, 35 (2): 140-147. |
| GUO Yanli, JIAO Xudong, YANG Shuai, et al. Population dynamics and host selectivity of Tetranychus turkestani and Tetranychus truncatus on different host[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2013, 35(2): 140-147. | |
| [22] | 蒋珏瑛琪. 土耳其斯坦叶螨和截形叶螨外部形态比较研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018. |
| JIANG Jueyingqi. Comparative study on the external morphology of Tetranychus turkestani and Tetranychus truncatus[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2018. | |
| [23] | 徐丹丹, 李文静, 张友军, 等. 二斑叶螨对不同甜瓜品种的取食和产卵选择性[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(5): 1070-1075. |
| XU Dandan, LI Wenjing, ZHANG Youjun, et al. Feeding and oviposition preferences of Tetranychus urticae on different melon varieties[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2019, 41(5): 1070-1075. | |
| [24] | 邱晔, 杨润, 陆明星, 等. 不同西甜瓜品种对截形叶螨生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2021, 58(2): 390-397. |
| QIU Ye, YANG Run, LU Mingxing, et al. Effects of melon cultivars on the growth, development and reproduction of Tetranychus truncatus Ehara (Acarina: Tetranychidae)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2021, 58(2): 390-397. | |
| [25] | 陆承志. 新疆农业害螨名录[J]. 塔里木农垦大学学报, 2003, (3): 23-27. |
| LU Chengzhi. List of Agricultural Mite Pests in[J]. Journal of Tarim Agricultural Reclamation University, 2003,(3): 23-27. | |
| [26] | 李海强, 李号宾, 丁瑞丰, 等. 转(Bt Cry1Ac+CP_4EPSPS)基因抗虫抗草甘膦棉花对草甘膦的耐受性研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40 (1): 209-214. |
| LI Haiqiang, LI Haobing, DING Ruifeng, et al. Study on the tolerance of glyphosate in transgenic cotton with Bt Cry1Ac+CP_4EPSPS gene for insect resistance and glyphosate resistance[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40 (1): 209-214. | |
| [27] | 刘波, 桂连友. 我国朱砂叶螨研究进展[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 农学卷, 2007, (3): 9-12 |
| LIU Bo, GUI Lianyou. Research progress of Tetranychus cinnabarinus in China. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Ed): Agricultural Science Volume, 2007,(3): 9-12. | |
| [28] | Adesanya A W, Lavine M D, Moural T W, et al. Mechanisms and management of acaricide resistance for Tetranychus urticae in agroecosystems[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2021, 94(3): 639-663. |
| [29] | 马艳, 彭军, 崔金杰. 不同类型杀螨剂对棉叶螨的室内活性及田间药效[J]. 西北农业学报, 2008, 17(6): 217-221. |
| MA Yan, PENG Jun, CUI Jinjie. Contact toxicities and field efficiency of different acaricides against the cotton red spider mites(Tetranychus cinnabarinus)[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2008, 17(6): 217-221. | |
| [30] | 甄丛爱, 买合吐木古力·艾孜不拉, 张帅, 等. 棉叶螨的抗药性现状与治理策略[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(3): 559-577. |
| Zhen Congai, Maihetumuguli Aizibula, Zhang Shuai, et al. Current status of insecticide resistance in cotton spider mites and resistance management strategies[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2023, 50(3): 559-577. | |
| [31] | 赵卫东. 二斑叶螨的抗药性及其机理研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2002. |
| ZHAO Weidong. Study on the resistance of Tetranychus urticae and its mechanism[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2002. | |
| [32] | 张颂函, 陈秀, 赵莉. 4种杀虫剂对草莓叶螨的田间药效研究[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2019, 40(10): 50-53. |
| ZHANG Songhan, CHEN Xiu, ZHAO Li. Study on Field control efficacy of four pesticides against strawberry mites[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2019, 40(10): 50-53. | |
| [33] | 王小军, 包建红, 张燕娜, 等. 土耳其斯坦叶螨对杀螨剂的抗性选育及解毒酶活力变化[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(4): 70-75. |
| WANG Xiaojun, BAO Jianhong, ZHANG Yanna, et al. Selection for insecticide resistance of Tetranychus turkestani strains and change in the activity of detoxification enzymes[J]. Plant Protection, 2017, 43(4): 70-75. |
| [1] | 马佳璇, 李雪萍, 李潇, 许世洋, 李建军, 杨成德, 孟欢, 漆永红. 番茄茄镰孢根腐病抗性品种鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(5): 1249-1257. |
| [2] | 刘帅, 阿尔孜姑丽·肉孜, 哈孜依, 王兵, 贾尊尊, 丁新华, 付开赟, 李克梅, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超. 深点食螨瓢虫对各虫态截形叶螨的捕食功能反应分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1190-1200. |
| [3] | 齐平, 索银·图娅, 魏杨, 张硕, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 阿地里·艾合买提. 10种药剂防治梅下毛瘿螨的田间防效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2761-2768. |
| [4] | 张建强, Abdramane salah zene, 王江来, 李佳佳, 张晓梦, 吴康莉, 田永强. 芹菜叶斑病病原菌细极链格孢药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1748-1757. |
| [5] | 初占宇, 贾培松, 罗影, 努尔孜亚·亚力买买提, 付永平, 李玉. 白灵菇褐腐病防治药剂药效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2682-2687. |
| [6] | 耿亚玲, 李耀发, 浑之英, 王华, 田婷婷, 王玲慧, 贾宏军, 袁立兵. 冀南棉田杂草发生种类及防治药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1876-1881. |
| [7] | 宋博, 艾米都拉·克尤木, 朱晓锋, 徐兵强, 阿布都克尤木·卡德尔, 杨森. 库尔勒香梨腐烂病发生及防治药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8): 1527-1534. |
| [8] | 符振实, 白洪瑞, 唐思琼, 苏杰, 陈静, 陆宴辉, 张建萍. 3种杀螨剂与双尾新小绥螨联合防治棉叶螨[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6): 1127-1135. |
| [9] | 阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 丁新华, 何江, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超, 李晓维. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12): 2291-2298. |
| [10] | 吴金龙, 冯宏祖, 马小艳, 王兰, 张亚林, 武刚. 棉田棉蚜飞防药剂筛选及农药减量增效药效分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1): 167-172. |
| [11] | 瓦热斯·为力, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪, 阿不都赛买提·乃合买提, 木拉提江, 玛依热. 生物复合药肥对棉叶螨及棉花生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(9): 1701-1709. |
| [12] | 李双建, 王小武, 王志慧, 付开赟, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 何江, 丁新华, 郭文超. 春播玉米田杂草化学防除药效筛选及其安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3): 551-559. |
| [13] | 胡迪, 张宣, 罗进仓, 南宏宇, 李怡萍. 河西走廊地区棉蚜发生动态及植物源农药药效分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1): 38-45. |
| [14] | 崔美娜,戴建国,王守会,张国顺,薛金利. 基于无人机多光谱影像的棉叶螨识别方法[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(8): 1457-1466. |
| [15] | 杨安沛,张航,白微微,田明昭,叶新宇,李广阔,王锁牢. 几种药剂对甜菜叶螨的田间防治效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(4): 719-725. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||