不同氮素水平下紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播对其产量和营养品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.07.028

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同氮素水平下紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播对其产量和营养品质的影响,筛选出最佳氮素水平下的混播比例。【方法】以紫花苜蓿(WL525HQ)和多年生黑麦草(托亚)为材料,采用两因素裂区设计,以施氮量为主区,N₀:不施氮;N₁:总施氮量20%为基肥、分枝期追肥20%、现蕾期追肥60%;N₂:总施氮量20%为基肥、分枝期追肥30%、现蕾期追肥50%;混播比例为副区单播紫花苜蓿(M)、多年生黑麦草(L),播种量分别为22.5、60.0 kg/hm²;紫花苜蓿+多年生黑麦草7∶3(M₇+L₃)、紫花苜蓿+多年生黑麦草6∶4(M₆+L₄)、紫花苜蓿+多年生黑麦草5∶5(M₅+L₅)、紫花苜蓿+多年生黑麦草4∶6(M₄+L₆)、紫花苜蓿+多年生黑麦草3∶7(M₃+L₇);共计21个处理,每个小区播种量按照单播处理的百分比分别播种,3个重复。比较分析各处理的产量和营养品质。【结果】在氮素水平N₀、N₁、N₂处理下,不同茬次紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播干草产量均显著高于单播(P<0.05),M₅+L₅处理干草产量达到1.06 t/hm²。在氮素水平N₀、N₁、N₂处理下,粗蛋白CP、干物质DM、饲料相对值RFV、总可滴化养分TDN和单位面积CP产量含量均显著高于单播(P<0.05),中性洗涤纤维NDF、酸性洗涤纤维ADF均显著低于单播(P<0.05);N₁氮素水平下,除M₇+L₃处理CP含量显著最高(P<0.05),且随多年生黑麦草的比例增加呈先增高后降低的趋势,M₅+L₅处理CP含量最高,M₆+L₄处理DM含量显著最高(P<0.05),M₅+L₅处理RFV、TDN最高(P<0.05)。而M₅+L₅处理NDF、ADF含量显著最低(P<0.05),且随多年生黑麦草的比例增加呈先降低后增高的趋势。【结论】不同氮素水平紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播产量、CP、DM、RFV、TDN、单位面积粗蛋白CP含量均高于单播,NDF、ADF含量低于单播,并在紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播比例5∶5最优,年干草产量达到1.06 t/hm²,粗蛋白含量为26.05%,NDF、ADF分别为26.03%、26.03%;氮素处理的牧草产量和营养品质要高于对照组,且混播中多年生黑麦草的氮素利用率随着其比例的增高而增高,其中以总施氮量(100 kg/hm²)的20%为基肥、分枝期追肥20%,现蕾期追肥60%最优。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿; 多年生黑麦草; 混播; 营养品质; 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】The effects of mixed sowing of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass on yield and nutritional quality under different nitrogen levels were explored, and the proportion of mixed sowing under the best nitrogen level was screened.【Methods】Alfalfa (WL525HQ) and perennial ryegrass (Toya) were used as materials, and a two-factor split-plot design was used.The nitrogen application rate was the main area, N₀ : no nitrogen application ; N₁ : 20% of the total nitrogen application was base fertilizer, 20% of the top dressing at branching stage, and 60% of the top dressing at budding stage ; N₂ : 20% of the total nitrogen application rate was base fertilizer, 30% of the top dressing at branching stage, and 50% of the top dressing at budding stage ; the mixed sowing ratio of alfalfa (M) and perennial ryegrass (L) was 22.5 kg / hm² and 60.0 kg / hm², respectively.Alfalfa + perennial ryegrass 7∶3 (M₇ + L₃), alfalfa + perennial ryegrass 6∶4 (M₆ + L₄), alfalfa + perennial ryegrass 5∶5 (M₅ + L₅), alfalfa + perennial ryegrass 4∶6 (M₄ + L₆), alfalfa + perennial ryegrass 3∶7 (M₃ + L₇) ; the sowing amount of each plot was sowed according to the percentage of single sowing treatment, with 3 replicates.The yield and nutritional quality of each treatment were compared and analyzed.【Results】Under N₀, N₁ and N₂ nitrogen levels, the hay yield of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass mixed sowing in different stubbles was significantly higher than that of single sowing (P<0.05), and the hay yield of M₅ + L₅ treatment reached 1.06 t / hm².Under N₀, N₁ and N₂ nitrogen levels, CP, DM, RFV, TDN and CP yield content per unit area were significantly higher than those of single sowing (P<0.05), and NDF and ADF were significantly lower than those of single sowing (P<0.05).Under N1 nitrogen level, the CP content of M₇ + L₃ treatment was the highest (P < 0.05), and increased first and then decreased with the increase of the proportion of perennial ryegrass.The CP content of M₅ + L₅ treatment was the highest, and the DM content of M₆ + L₄ treatment was the highest (P< 0.05).The RFV and TDN of M₅ + L₅ treatment were the highest (P < 0.05).The contents of NDF and ADF in M₅ + L₅ treatment were the lowest (P < 0.05), and decreased first and then increased with the increase of the proportion of perennial ryegrass.【Conclusion】The yield, CP, DM, RFV, TDN and crude protein content per unit area of mixed sowing of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass at different nitrogen levels were higher than those of monoculture, and the contents of NDF and ADF were lower than those of monoculture.The optimum ratio of mixed sowing of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass was 5∶5.The annual hay yield reached 1.06 t / hm², the crude protein content was 26.05%, and the NDF and ADF were 26.03% and 26.03%, respectively; The forage yield and nutritional quality of nitrogen treatment were higher than that of the control group, and the nitrogen utilization rate of perennial ryegrass in mixed sowing increased with the increase of its proportion.Among them, 20% of the total nitrogen application rate (100kg / hm²) was the base fertilizer, 20% of the topdressing at the branching stage, and 60% of the topdressing at the budding stage was the best.

Key words: alfalfa; perennial ryegrass; mixed sowing; nutritional quality; yield

中图分类号:

S542+.3

马勇, 刘慧, 高红梅, 康雪, 马春晖. 不同氮素水平下紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播对其产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1793-1804.

MA Yong, LIU Hui, GAO Hhongmei, KANG Xue, MA Chunhui. Effects of mixed seeding of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass on yield and nutritional quality under different nitrogen levels[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1793-1804.

图/表 6

参考文献 46

[1]	胡自治. 人工草地在我国21世纪草业发展和环境治理中的重要意义[J]. 草原与草坪, 2000, 20(1): 12-15.
	HU Zizhi. The importance of artificial grassland in the development of prataculture and the control of environment in China of 21 century[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2000, 20(1): 12-15.
[2]	韩永芬, 覃涛英, 付薇, 等. 紫花苜蓿与扁穗雀麦、鸭茅混播效果研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2018, 39(6):62-66.
	HAN Yongfen, QIN Taoying, FU Wei, et al. Effect of Mixed Seeding of Medicago sativa with Bromus catharticus and Dactylis glomerata[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2018, 39(6): 62-66.
[3]	同延安, 梁东丽, 张树兰, 等. 氮肥与环境[C]// 氮素循环与农业和环境学术研讨会论文. 2001.
	TONG Yanan, LIANG Dongli, ZHANG Shulan, et al. Symposium on Nitrogen Fertilizer and Environment[C]// Nitrogen Cycle and Agriculture and Environment Paper, 2001.
[4]	Liu X S, Zhao J W, Liu J Y, et al. Water-phosphorus coupling enhances fine root turnover and dry matter yield of alfalfa under drip irrigation[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2021, 113(5): 4161-4175.
[5]	McDonald I, Baral R, Min D. Effects of alfalfa and alfalfa-grass mixtures with nitrogen fertilization on dry matter yield and forage nutritive value[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2021, 63(2): 305-318. DOI PMID
[6]	Zhang Q B, Liu J Y, Liu X S, et al. Optimizing water and phosphorus management to improve hay yield and water- and phosphorus-use efficiency in alfalfa under drip irrigation[J]. Food Science & Nutrition, 2020, 8(5): 2406-2418.
[7]	刘春英, 孙学映, 朱体超, 等. 不同黑麦草品种生产性能比较与优势品种筛选[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 39-48. DOI
	LIU Chunying, SUN Xueying, ZHU Tichao, et al. Comparison of the production performance of ryegrass cultivars and screening of dominant varieties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 39-48. DOI
[8]	郭宏宇. 基于海流图轻度盐碱地的禾草与苜蓿混播建植研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019.
	GUO Hongyu. Analysis of Mixed Seeding Pasture of Grass and Alfalfa on Saline-alkali Soil in Hailiutu[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019.
[9]	周鹏, 耿燕, 马文红, 等. 温带草地主要优势植物不同器官间功能性状的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 7-16. DOI
	ZHOU Peng, GENG Yan, MA Wenhong, et al. Linkages of functional traits among plant organs in the dominant species of the Inner Mongolia grassland, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1): 7-16. DOI
[10]	陆姣云, 杨惠敏, 田宏, 等. 水分对不同生育时期紫花苜蓿茎叶碳、氮、磷含量及化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(6): 25-34.
	LU Jiaoyun, YANG Huimin, TIAN Hong, et al. Effect of water addition on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, and stoichiometric characteristics of alfalfa stems and leaves at different growth stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(6): 25-34.
[11]	霍延卫. 种植牧草的意义与牧草施肥技术[J]. 畜牧兽医科技信息, 2021, (10): 46-47.
	HUO Yanwei. Significance of planting forage and forage fertilization technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, (10): 46-47.
[12]	陈娟. 优质牧草的种植技术分析[J]. 种子科技, 2021, 39(20): 31-32.
	CHEN Juan. Analysis of planting techniques of high quality forage grass[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2021, 39(20): 31-32.
[13]	邢宇俊, 程智慧, 周艳丽, 等. 保护地蔬菜连作障碍原因及其调控[J]. 西北农业学报, 2004, 13(1): 120-123.
	XING Yujun, CHENG Zhihui, ZHOU Yanli, et al. Causes and modulations of protected vegetable continuous cropping obstacles[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2004, 13(1): 120-123.
[14]	熊乙, 许庆方, 玉柱, 等. 不同苜蓿干草营养成分及饲用价值评价[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(5): 1262-1266. DOI
	XIONG Yi, XU Qingfang, YU Zhu, et al. Evaluation of nutritional components and feeding value of DifferentAlfalfa hay[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(5): 1262-1266. DOI
[15]	蔡宏宇, 董宇, 马艳, 等. 五种非常规饲料营养成分分析与体外降解效果评价[J/OL]. 饲料工业:1-11[2023-06-07].
	CAI Hongyu, DONG Yu, MA Yan, et al. Evaluation of Nutrient Content and In Vitro Degradation Rate of Five Unconventional Feeds[J / OL]. Feed Industry: 1-11 [ 2023-06-07 ].
[16]	马金慧, 范富, 包呼格吉乐图, 等. 不同收获时期的玉米饲用生物学产量和营养价值的比较研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19):104-108.
	MA Jinhui, FAN Fu, BAO Hugejiletu, et al. Comparative study on feeding biological yield and nutritional value of maize in different harvest periods[J]. Feed Research, 2022, 45(19):104-108.
[17]	刘启宇, 云岚, 陈逸凡, 等. 苜蓿——禾草混播草地牧草产量及种间竞争关系的动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3): 181-191. DOI
	LIU Qiyu, YUN Lan, CHEN Yifan, et al. The dynamic analysis of forage yield and interspecific competition in alfalfa-grass mixed pasture[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 181-191. DOI
[18]	方伟. 高寒地区不同禾豆混播组合与比例对牧草产量及品质的影响[J]. 青海草业, 2022, 31(4): 1-8.
	FANG Wei. Effects of different mixtures and proportions of legume-grass mixtures on productivity and quality in alpine cold region[J]. Qinghai Prataculture, 2022, 31(4): 1-8.
[19]	田昌玉, 林治安, 徐久凯, 等. 有机肥氮素利用率的几种典型计算方法比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1909-1916.
	TIAN Changyu, LIN Zhian, XU Jiukai, et al. Comparison of organic fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency calculated by several typical methods[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(10): 1909-1916.
[20]	聂兆君, 秦世玉, 刘红恩, 等. 氮锌配施对冬小麦产量及土壤氮素转化相关酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(3): 431-441.
	NIE Zhaojun, QIN Shiyu, LIU Hongen, et al. Effects of combined application of nitrogen and zinc on winter wheat yield and soil enzyme activities related to nitrogen transformation[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(3): 431-441.
[21]	平措, 吴玉江, 索朗达, 等. 西藏拉萨地区施肥及混播比例对燕麦+箭筈豌豆生产性能的影响[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2022, 42(02):39-42.
	PING Cuo, WU Yujiang, SUO Langda, et al. Effects of Fertilization and Mixed Planting on the Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Oat and Vetch in Lhasa, Tibet[J]. China Herbivore Science, 2022, 42 (02): 39-42.
[22]	王乐, 张玉霞, 于华荣, 等. 氮肥对沙地燕麦生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(7): 1516-1521.
	WANG Le, ZHANG Yuxia, YU Huarong, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on growth characteristics and yield of oats in sandy soil[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(7): 1516-1521.
[23]	魏孔涛, 鱼小军, 白梅梅, 等. 混播比例对半干旱区放牧型混播草地草产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(9): 56-65.
	WEI Kongtao, YU Xiaojun, BAI Meimei, et al. Effect of mixed sowing ratio on the forage yield and quality of grazing mixed sowing grassland in semi-arid area[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(9): 56-65.
[24]	冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 等. 三江源区小黑麦与豆科饲草混播最佳组合及比例研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(2): 232-241.
	FENG Tingxu, DE Kejia, XIANG Xuemei, et al. Optimal combination and proportion of Triticale and leguminous forage grass in established artificial grassland at three-river source region[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2023, 32(2): 232-241.
[25]	赵京东, 宋彦涛, 徐鑫磊, 等. 施氮和刈割对辽西北退化草地牧草产量和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(8): 36-48. DOI
	ZHAO Jingdong, SONG Yantao, XU Xinlei, et al. Effects of nitrogen application and mowing on yield and quality of forage in degraded grassland in northwest Liaoning Province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 36-48. DOI
[26]	何亚灵, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 等. 氮肥水平对豆禾混播草地产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(5): 721-727, 745.
	HE Yaling, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tairu, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield and quality of legume-grass mixtures[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(5): 721-727, 745.[万方]
[27]	陈香来, 潘佳, 陈利军, 等. 施肥对黄土高原紫花苜蓿产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(12): 3145-3154.
	CHEN Xianglai, PAN Jia, CHEN Lijun, et al. Effects of fertilization on hay yield and quality of alfalfa on the Loess Plateau[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(12): 3145-3154.
[28]	王晓力, 王静. 紫花苜蓿种子生产田间管理关键技术[J]. 内蒙古草业, 2004, 16(1): 59.
	WANG Xiaoli, WANG Jing. Key techniques for field management of alfalfa seed production[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Prataculture, 2004, 16(1): 59.
[29]	刘文兰. 紫花苜蓿叶片植物学特征及化学计量特征对植株密度和磷素供给的响应[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018.
	LIU Wenlan. Responses of Botanical Features and Stoichiometric Traits of Alfalfa Leaf to Plant Density and Phosphorus Supply[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018.
[30]	刘敏, 龚吉蕊, 王忆慧, 等. 豆禾混播建植人工草地对牧草产量和草质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1): 179-185.
	LIU Min, GONG Jirui, WANG Yihui, et al. Effects of legume-grass mixed sowing on forage grass yield and quality in artificial grassland[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(1): 179-185.
[31]	王丹, 王俊杰, 李凌浩, 等. 旱作条件下苜蓿与冰草不同混播方式的产草量及种间竞争关系[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(5): 27-31.
	WANG Dan, WANG Junjie, LI Linghao, et al. Forage yield and interspecific competition of mixed sowing of alfalfa and wheatgrass under dry farming[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(5): 27-31.
[32]	何玮, 张新全, 杨春华. 刈割次数、施肥量及混播比例对牛鞭草和白三叶混播草地牧草品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2006, 23(4): 39-42.
	HE Wei, ZHANG Xinquan, YANG Chunhua. The effects of cutting frequency, seeding rates and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and quality of mixture pasture ofHemarthria compressaandTrifolium repens[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2006, 23(4): 39-42.
[33]	Xu R R, Shi W, Kamran M, et al. Grass-legume mixture and nitrogen application improve yield, quality, and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of grazed pastures in the Loess Plateau[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1088849.
[34]	冯琴, 王斌, 王腾飞, 等. 不同播种量毛苕子与燕麦混播对草地生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3439-3446. DOI
	FENG Qin, WANG Bin, WANG Tengfei, et al. Effects of mixed sowing of vetch and oat on production performance and nutrient quality of grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3439-3446. DOI
[35]	Cong W F, Hoffland E, Li L, et al. Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen[J]. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(4): 1715-1726.
[36]	郝凤. 紫花苜蓿氮效率差异机制与氮营养阶段生育期划分的研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2017.
	HAO Feng. Study on Nitrogen Efficiency Mechanism and Division Growth Period by Nitrogen Nutrition Stage of Alfalfa[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2017.
[37]	陈波浪, 吴海华, 曹公利, 等. 不同肥力水平下立架栽培甜瓜干物质累积和氮、磷、钾养分吸收特性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(1): 142-149.
	CHEN Bolang, WU Haihua, CAO Gongli, et al. Characteristics of dry matter accumulation and N, P and K assimilations of trellis-cultivated melon under different fertility rates[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(1): 142-149.
[38]	冯琴, 王斌, 海艺蕊, 等. 毛苕子不同播种量与燕麦混播对群落竞争及燕麦生物量分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2423-2429. DOI
	FENG Qin, WANG Bin, HAI Yirui, et al. Effects of mixed sowing of vetch and oat on community competition and biomass allocation of oats[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2423-2429. DOI
[39]	Fan K K, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Guo X S, et al. Suppressed N fixation and diazotrophs after four decades of fertilization[J]. Microbiome, 2019, 7(1): 143.
[40]	巨晓棠, 张福锁. 关于氮肥利用率的思考[J]. 生态环境, 2003, 12(2): 192-197.
	JU Xiaotang, ZHANG Fusuo. Thinking about nitrogen recovery rate[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2003, 12(2): 192-197.
[41]	马雪琴. 高寒牧区播期和氮肥对燕麦产量及其构成和氮素吸收利用与分配的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2007.
	MA Xueqin. Effects of sowing date and N application on yield and its components, N uptake and allocation in oats in alpine region[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2007.
[42]	田永雷, 张玉霞, 朱爱民, 等. 施氮对科尔沁沙地饲用燕麦产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(5): 54-58.
	TIAN Yonglei, ZHANG Yuxia, ZHU Aimin, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of oat in Horqin sandy land[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(5): 54-58.
[43]	苟志文, 胡发龙, 赵财, 等. 氮肥后移满足绿洲灌区全膜覆盖玉米的氮素需求[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4): 888-895.
	GOU Zhiwen, HU Falong, ZHAO Cai, et al. Postponed topdressing of nitrogen fertilizers to meet nitrogen requirement of maize under full plastic film mulching in Oasis Irrigation Region[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 888-895.
[44]	杨蕊, 耿石英, 王小燕. 江汉平原不同氮肥运筹模式下豆麦和稻/麦轮作系统小麦产量和经济效益差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 441-448. DOI
	YANG Rui, GENG Shiying, WANG Xiaoyan. Differences of wheat yield and economic benefits between soybean-wheat and rice-wheat cropping under different nitrogen fertilization patterns in Jianghan Plain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(2): 441-448. DOI
[45]	Simili da Silva M, Tremblay G F, Bélanger G, et al. Forage energy to protein ratio of several legume-grass complex mixtures[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2014, 188: 17-27.
[46]	Bo P T, Dong Y L, Zhang R F, et al. Optimization of alfalfa-based mixed cropping with winter wheat and ryegrass in terms of forage yield and quality traits[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(13): 1752.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	3	0	0	28

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	11	20
比例	35%	65%

摘要

106

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	106

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	31	75
比例	29%	71%

处理 Treatments		粗蛋白 CP(%)	干物质 DM(%)	中性洗涤纤维 NDF(%)	酸性洗涤纤维 ADF(%)	饲料相对价值 RFV	总可消化养分 TND	单位面积 CP产量 (unit area)CP (%)
N₀	M	20.27±0.01^Cc	23.35±0.01^Bc	35.31±0.01^Ab	22.79±0.01^Aab	144.54±7.0^Ab	71.12±0.37^Bc	68.97±4.72^Bb
	L	17.65±0.02^Bd	28.90±0.02^Ba	47.31±0.01^Aa	25.48±0.01^Aa	132.59±4.41^Ac	71.19±0.94^Bc	25.80±4.61^Cc
	M₇+L₃	24.21±0.12^Ba	27.59±0.01^Bb	31.92±0.02^Ac	20.27±0.12^Ac	151.13±5.31^Aa	74.49±1.50^Bb	115.71±9.25^Ba
	M₆+L₄	22.32±0.01^Bb	24.98±0.01^Bbc	33.78±0.01^Ab	23.71±0.02^Aab	150.57±5.98^Aa	71.16±1.14^Bc	82.01±2.23^Cb
	M₅+L₅	23.32±0.01^Bab	25.17±0.01^Bbc	28.09±0.01^Bd	17.95±0.01^Bd	154.40±6.00^Aa	75.95±0.75^Bb	81.53±8.09^Bb
	M₄+L₆	23.65±0.01^Aab	26.43±0.03^Babc	24.51±0.07^Ce	15.38±0.03^Ce	153.08±4.2^Aa	78.05±0.54^Aa	74.81±14.25^Bb
	M₃+L₇	22.33±0.02^Ab	23.79±0.01^Bce	27.45±0.01^Cd	15.47±0.01^Ce	153.65±3.91^Aa	78.22±0.95^Aa	87.52±7.31^Bb
N₁	M	25.05±0.01^Ab	27.63±0.01^Ac	30.47±0.03^Bb	19.43±0.02^Ba	145.24±9.73^Ab	75.43±0.76^Ab	119.52±1.49^Ab
	L	17.43±0.03^Ad	33.76±0.01^Aa	48.98±0.02^Ba	19.62±0.05^Ba	130.76±0.30^Ab	72.54±1.40^Ac	48.73±4.78^Ac
	M₇+L₃	26.39±0.05^Aa	27.39±0.03^Bc	30.61±0.02^Bb	18.96±0.02^Bab	151.02±3.11^Aa	75.94±0.91^Ab	164.49±7.12^Aa
	M₆+L₄	24.86±0.02^Ac	30.02±0.02^Aa	30.43±0.01^Bb	20.02±0.03^Ba	150.82±1.31^Aa	74.91±0.48^Ab	175.01±5.47^Aa
	M₅+L₅	26.05±0.01^Aa	25.31±0.02^Bc	26.03±0.03^Cc	15.34±0.04^Cb	154.00±1.78^Aa	78.07±0.70^Aa	168.03±12.21^Aa
	M₄+L₆	22.44±0.03^Ac	19.29±0.03^Cd	29.33±0.02^Bb	18.08±0.02^Bb	152.90±7.36^Aa	74.99±0.66^Bb	112.92±9.31^Ab
	M₃+L₇	22.74±0.01^Bc	27.05±0.02^Ac	31.07±0.02^Bb	20.28±0.02^Ba	150.61±4.00^Aa	74.10±0.30^Bbc	116.01±8.62^Ab
N₂	M	23.06±0.01^Bc	27.86±0.01^Abc	27.65±0.02^Bd	18.64±0.01^Bbc	142.56±3.24^Ab	75.33±0.25^Aab	82.07±9.12^Be
	L	19.00±0.02^Bf	34.23±0.04^Aa	40.64±0.03^Ba	18.04±0.02^Bbc	136.49±3.29^Ac	74.32±0.19^Ab	48.19±8.06^Bf
	M₇+L₃	25.43±0.01^Ba	29.59±0.01^Abc	30.14±0.01^Bc	16.50±0.05^Bc	148.72±4.25^Aab	74.55±047^Bb	183.65±7.01^Aa
	M₆+L₄	22.00±0.03^Bd	28.95±0.02^Abc	29.33±0.01^Bc	19.19±0.01^Babc	150.18±3.91^Aa	74.52±1.04^Ab	121.01±4.43^Bc
	M₅+L₅	23.87±0.01^Ab	28.75±0.01^Abc	30.24±0.01^Ac	20.02±0.01^Aabc	148.12±3.14^Aab	77.83±4.38^ABa	141.85±9.98^ABb
	M₄+L₆	20.24±0.05^Be	31.69±0.01^Aab	35.10±0.01^Ab	23.55±0.03^Aa	152.02±4.77^Aa	70.53±0.90^Cc	106.19±9.99^Ad
	M₃+L₇	24.20±0.01^Ab	26.23±0.01^Ac	35.76±0.02^Ab	21.53±0.01^Aab	152.08±1.31^Aa	73.51±0.37^Bbc	101.03±1.25^ABd

处理 Treatments		粗蛋白 CP(%)	干物质 DM(%)	中性洗涤纤维 NDF(%)	酸性洗涤纤维 ADF(%)	饲料相对价值 RFV	总可消化养分 TND	单位面积 CP产量 (unit area)CP (%)
N₀	M	20.27±0.01^Cc	23.35±0.01^Bc	35.31±0.01^Ab	22.79±0.01^Aab	144.54±7.0^Ab	71.12±0.37^Bc	68.97±4.72^Bb
	L	17.65±0.02^Bd	28.90±0.02^Ba	47.31±0.01^Aa	25.48±0.01^Aa	132.59±4.41^Ac	71.19±0.94^Bc	25.80±4.61^Cc
	M₇+L₃	24.21±0.12^Ba	27.59±0.01^Bb	31.92±0.02^Ac	20.27±0.12^Ac	151.13±5.31^Aa	74.49±1.50^Bb	115.71±9.25^Ba
	M₆+L₄	22.32±0.01^Bb	24.98±0.01^Bbc	33.78±0.01^Ab	23.71±0.02^Aab	150.57±5.98^Aa	71.16±1.14^Bc	82.01±2.23^Cb
	M₅+L₅	23.32±0.01^Bab	25.17±0.01^Bbc	28.09±0.01^Bd	17.95±0.01^Bd	154.40±6.00^Aa	75.95±0.75^Bb	81.53±8.09^Bb
	M₄+L₆	23.65±0.01^Aab	26.43±0.03^Babc	24.51±0.07^Ce	15.38±0.03^Ce	153.08±4.2^Aa	78.05±0.54^Aa	74.81±14.25^Bb
	M₃+L₇	22.33±0.02^Ab	23.79±0.01^Bce	27.45±0.01^Cd	15.47±0.01^Ce	153.65±3.91^Aa	78.22±0.95^Aa	87.52±7.31^Bb
N₁	M	25.05±0.01^Ab	27.63±0.01^Ac	30.47±0.03^Bb	19.43±0.02^Ba	145.24±9.73^Ab	75.43±0.76^Ab	119.52±1.49^Ab
	L	17.43±0.03^Ad	33.76±0.01^Aa	48.98±0.02^Ba	19.62±0.05^Ba	130.76±0.30^Ab	72.54±1.40^Ac	48.73±4.78^Ac
	M₇+L₃	26.39±0.05^Aa	27.39±0.03^Bc	30.61±0.02^Bb	18.96±0.02^Bab	151.02±3.11^Aa	75.94±0.91^Ab	164.49±7.12^Aa
	M₆+L₄	24.86±0.02^Ac	30.02±0.02^Aa	30.43±0.01^Bb	20.02±0.03^Ba	150.82±1.31^Aa	74.91±0.48^Ab	175.01±5.47^Aa
	M₅+L₅	26.05±0.01^Aa	25.31±0.02^Bc	26.03±0.03^Cc	15.34±0.04^Cb	154.00±1.78^Aa	78.07±0.70^Aa	168.03±12.21^Aa
	M₄+L₆	22.44±0.03^Ac	19.29±0.03^Cd	29.33±0.02^Bb	18.08±0.02^Bb	152.90±7.36^Aa	74.99±0.66^Bb	112.92±9.31^Ab
	M₃+L₇	22.74±0.01^Bc	27.05±0.02^Ac	31.07±0.02^Bb	20.28±0.02^Ba	150.61±4.00^Aa	74.10±0.30^Bbc	116.01±8.62^Ab
N₂	M	23.06±0.01^Bc	27.86±0.01^Abc	27.65±0.02^Bd	18.64±0.01^Bbc	142.56±3.24^Ab	75.33±0.25^Aab	82.07±9.12^Be
	L	19.00±0.02^Bf	34.23±0.04^Aa	40.64±0.03^Ba	18.04±0.02^Bbc	136.49±3.29^Ac	74.32±0.19^Ab	48.19±8.06^Bf
	M₇+L₃	25.43±0.01^Ba	29.59±0.01^Abc	30.14±0.01^Bc	16.50±0.05^Bc	148.72±4.25^Aab	74.55±047^Bb	183.65±7.01^Aa
	M₆+L₄	22.00±0.03^Bd	28.95±0.02^Abc	29.33±0.01^Bc	19.19±0.01^Babc	150.18±3.91^Aa	74.52±1.04^Ab	121.01±4.43^Bc
	M₅+L₅	23.87±0.01^Ab	28.75±0.01^Abc	30.24±0.01^Ac	20.02±0.01^Aabc	148.12±3.14^Aab	77.83±4.38^ABa	141.85±9.98^ABb
	M₄+L₆	20.24±0.05^Be	31.69±0.01^Aab	35.10±0.01^Ab	23.55±0.03^Aa	152.02±4.77^Aa	70.53±0.90^Cc	106.19±9.99^Ad
	M₃+L₇	24.20±0.01^Ab	26.23±0.01^Ac	35.76±0.02^Ab	21.53±0.01^Aab	152.08±1.31^Aa	73.51±0.37^Bbc	101.03±1.25^ABd

处理 Treatments	土地当量比(LER)
处理 Treatments	N₀	N₁	N₂
M₇+L₃	1.60±0.23^Ba	1.67±0.36^Ba	1.92±0.33^Aa
M₆+L₄	1.08±0.06^Cb	1.36±0.11^Bb	1.61±0.11^Aab
M₅+L₅	1.55±0.24^Aa	1.61±0.41^Aa	1.72±0.28^Aab
M₄+L₆	1.24±0.17^Aab	1.44±0.48^Aab	1.36±0.10^Ab
M₃+L₇	1.23±0.19^Aab	1.38±0.42^Aab	1.40±0.10^Ab

处理 Treatments	土地当量比(LER)
处理 Treatments	N₀	N₁	N₂
M₇+L₃	1.60±0.23^Ba	1.67±0.36^Ba	1.92±0.33^Aa
M₆+L₄	1.08±0.06^Cb	1.36±0.11^Bb	1.61±0.11^Aab
M₅+L₅	1.55±0.24^Aa	1.61±0.41^Aa	1.72±0.28^Aab
M₄+L₆	1.24±0.17^Aab	1.44±0.48^Aab	1.36±0.10^Ab
M₃+L₇	1.23±0.19^Aab	1.38±0.42^Aab	1.40±0.10^Ab

处理 Treatments		CP(叶) CP (leaves)	CP(茎) CP (stems)	茎(DM) Stem (DM)	叶(DM) Leaf (DM)	吸氮量 Nitrogen uptake	氮素利用率 Nitrogen utilization rate	株高(豆) Plant height (Legumes)	株高(禾) Plant height (Grasses)
N₀	L	13.41±0.21^Bb	7.47±0.21^Be	33.31±0.31^Bb	28.89±0.31^Ca	26.10±1.91^Ba		49.5±0.30^Bc	31.6±1.96^Ab
	M₇+L₃	14.96±0.10^Ab	9.37±0.31^Bd	27.96±0.31^Ad	22.58±0.32^Ac	9.38±2.08^Cc		56.7±2.08^Aa	42.3±2.41^Aa
	M₆+L₄	14.54±0.12^Bb	10.58±0.21^Bc	35.41±0.25^Aa	27.22±0.36^Aab	12.01±1.26^Bbc		55.5±1.50^Aa	26.6±1.91^Ac
	M₅+L₅	14.10±0.13^Ab	10.24±0.51^Bc	32.60±0.23^Bb	27.97±0.88^Aab	9.81±1.06^Cc		54.4±1.21^Aab	26.8±0.20^Bc
	M₄+L₆	17.60±0.50^Aa	12.30±0.52^Ab	23.89±0.24^Ce	22.44±0.84^Cc	14.01±1.46^Bb		56.4±3.24^Aa	34.0±2.64^Ab
	M₃+L₇	16.71±0.51^Aa	13.62±0.41^Aa	33.52±0.65^Ab	26.21±0.56^Ab	14.89±2.35^Cb		51.7±1.61^Bbc	30.7±1.52^Ab
N₁	L	13.59±0.21^Bc	9.44±0.21^Bc	36.39±0.01^Aa	33.82±0.21^Aa	57.96±6.87^Aa		54.2±0.85^Ac	34.7±1.47^Ac
	M₇+L₃	15.03±0.05^Abc	7.76±0.24^Cd	23.08±0.56^Bd	20.26±0.11^Bf	23.23±2.14^Ae	13.89±0.21^Ac	57.7±3.86^Aabc	42.8±1.96^Aa
	M₆+L₄	18.39±0.13^Aa	12.36±0.10^Aa	23.65±0.85^Bd	21.76±0.23^Be	31.22±3.57^Ace	19.21±0.35^Abc	57.3±5.74^Aabc	28.8±1.36^Ad
	M₅+L₅	16.21±0.25^Ab	11.99±0.05^Aa	31.17±0.95^Bc	25.04±0.35^Bd	34.60±3.36^Ac	24.80±0.33^Ab	56.5±3.74^Abc	32.3±2.41^Ac
	M₄+L₆	15.35±0.63^Bbc	10.35±0.09^Bb	32.10±0.23^Abc	26.14±0.25^Bc	38.19±7.22^Abc	24.19±0.72^Ab	61.3±2.08^Aab	38.0±1.73^Ab
	M₃+L₇	15.16±0.23^Bbc	9.85±0.56^Bbc	32.55±0.87^Bb	27.31±0.25^Ab	44.62±1.24^Ab	29.62±0.12^Aa	63.2±0.72^Aa	33.2±1.05^Ac
N₂	L	14.91±0.25^Ace	9.95±0.58^Ab	33.10±0.25^Ba	29.61±0.35^Ba	53.42±7.38^Aa		50.1±0.90^Bc	33.7±1.13^Abc
	M₇+L₃	15.72±0.23^Ac	10.14±0.36^Ae	27.06±0.35^Aa	22.91±0.58^Ad	16.07±3.37^Be	6.73±0.35^Be	59.7±0.57^Aab	39.1±4.41^Aa
	M₆+L₄	18.65±0.35^Aa	12.03±0.58^Af	24.81±0.54^Ba	19.74±0.65^Be	29.30±3.87^Ac	17.29±0.38^Bbc	58.1±1.87^Ab	28.8±0.58^Ac
	M₅+L₅	15.27±0.23^Ac	9.06±0.56^Ba	35.92±0.56^Aa	26.99±0.98^Cb	21.79±2.01^Be	11.99±0.30^Bce	56.3±3.75^Ab	29.3±1.08^ABc
	M₄+L₆	16.98±0.35^Ab	12.14±0.65^Ac	31.39±0.58^Ba	29.18±0.58^Aa	32.20±2.56^bAc	18.20±0.25^Bb	59.5±1.80^Aab	34.7±3.40^Aab
	M₃+L₇	14.12±0.68^Ce	9.35±0.65^Bd	30.03±0.57^Ca	23.81±0.54^Bc	38.77±2.54^b	23.77±0.25^Ba	61.9±0.98^Aa	35.6±3.54^Aab