新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 109-117.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.012
杨波(), 王昊, 陈永伟, 哈蓉, 靳韦, 徐灿, 张敏, 杨桂丽, 杨宏波, 马文礼(
)
收稿日期:
2023-04-20
出版日期:
2024-01-20
发布日期:
2024-02-21
通信作者:
马文礼(1975-),男,宁夏平罗人,研究员,研究方向为作物栽培,(E-mail) mwl7544@163.com作者简介:
杨波(1992-),男,宁夏中卫人,助理农艺师,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)752536645@qq.com
基金资助:
YANG Bo(), WANG Hao, CHEN Yongwei, HA Rong, JIN Wei, XU Can, ZHANG Min, YANG Guili, YANG Hongbo, MA Wenli(
)
Received:
2023-04-20
Published:
2024-01-20
Online:
2024-02-21
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究提高酿酒葡萄苗木品质(质量)和良种繁育速度(效率)的技术,建立酿酒葡萄品种紫大夫、小味儿多和长相思等品种的组培脱毒快繁技术体系,为提高小众酿酒葡萄品种苗木的品质及快速繁殖提供依据。【方法】以3个酿酒葡萄1年生腋芽为外植体,采用正交试验设计方法,分析不同消毒方式对外植体成活率的影响,研究不同浓度6-BA、IBA、NAA和不同培养基组合对腋芽萌发、增殖及生根培养的影响。【结果】腋芽经10%次氯酸钠消毒7.5 min,75%乙醇消毒30 s,0.1%HgCl2消毒10 min能提高腋芽的成活率,降低污染率;经消毒后的外植体接种到添加1.0 mg/L 6-BA和0.05 mg/L NAA的MS培养基中,其萌芽率最高;将启动培养的无菌新芽接种到添加1.0 mg/L 6-BA和0.3 mg/L IBA 的1/2MS培养基中,丛生芽增殖效果最佳,将增殖培养后的单芽切下接种到添加0.4 mg/L IBA和0.4 mg/L NAA的1/2MS生根培养基中,组培苗的生根综合质量最佳。【结论】建立了3个酿酒葡萄品种组培快繁脱毒技术体系。采用热处理结合茎尖进行组培苗的脱毒,能够脱除绝大部分的葡萄病毒。
中图分类号:
杨波, 王昊, 陈永伟, 哈蓉, 靳韦, 徐灿, 张敏, 杨桂丽, 杨宏波, 马文礼. 3个酿酒葡萄品种组培快繁体系的建立及优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 109-117.
YANG Bo, WANG Hao, CHEN Yongwei, HA Rong, JIN Wei, XU Can, ZHANG Min, YANG Guili, YANG Hongbo, MA Wenli. Study on establishment and optimization of rapid tissue culture propagation technology of three wine grape cultivars[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 109-117.
处理 编号 Process number | 10%次氯酸钠 消毒时间 10% sodium hypochlorite disinfection time(min) | 75%乙醇 消毒时间 75%Alcohol disinfection time(s) | 0.1%氯化汞 消毒时间 0.1%Mercury chloride disinfection time(min) |
---|---|---|---|
C1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
C2 | 5 | 30 | 7.5 |
C3 | 5 | 60 | 10 |
C4 | 7.5 | 5 | 7.5 |
C5 | 7.5 | 30 | 10 |
C6 | 7.5 | 60 | 5 |
C7 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
C8 | 10 | 30 | 5 |
C9 | 10 | 60 | 7.5 |
表1 不同酿酒葡萄品种外植体消毒处理
Tab.1 Disinfection treatment of explants of different wine grape
处理 编号 Process number | 10%次氯酸钠 消毒时间 10% sodium hypochlorite disinfection time(min) | 75%乙醇 消毒时间 75%Alcohol disinfection time(s) | 0.1%氯化汞 消毒时间 0.1%Mercury chloride disinfection time(min) |
---|---|---|---|
C1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
C2 | 5 | 30 | 7.5 |
C3 | 5 | 60 | 10 |
C4 | 7.5 | 5 | 7.5 |
C5 | 7.5 | 30 | 10 |
C6 | 7.5 | 60 | 5 |
C7 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
C8 | 10 | 30 | 5 |
C9 | 10 | 60 | 7.5 |
处理编号 Process number | 培养基类型 Type of culture medium | 6-BA (mg/L) | NAA (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
D1 | MS | 0.5 | 0 |
D2 | MS | 1 | 0.05 |
D3 | MS | 1.5 | 0.1 |
D4 | 1/2MS | 0.5 | 0.05 |
D5 | 1/2MS | 1 | 0.1 |
D6 | 1/2MS | 1.5 | 0 |
D7 | GS | 0.5 | 0.1 |
D8 | GS | 1 | 0 |
D9 | GS | 1.5 | 0.05 |
表2 不同酿酒葡萄品种外植体启动培养基
Tab.2 Startup medium for explants of different wine grape varieties
处理编号 Process number | 培养基类型 Type of culture medium | 6-BA (mg/L) | NAA (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
D1 | MS | 0.5 | 0 |
D2 | MS | 1 | 0.05 |
D3 | MS | 1.5 | 0.1 |
D4 | 1/2MS | 0.5 | 0.05 |
D5 | 1/2MS | 1 | 0.1 |
D6 | 1/2MS | 1.5 | 0 |
D7 | GS | 0.5 | 0.1 |
D8 | GS | 1 | 0 |
D9 | GS | 1.5 | 0.05 |
处理编号 Process number | 培养基类型 Type of culture medium | 6-BA (mg/L) | IBA (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
E1 | MS | 0.5 | 0.1 |
E2 | MS | 1 | 0.2 |
E3 | MS | 1.5 | 0.3 |
E4 | 1/2MS | 0.5 | 0.2 |
E5 | 1/2MS | 1 | 0.3 |
E6 | 1/2MS | 1.5 | 0.1 |
E7 | GS | 0.5 | 0.3 |
E8 | GS | 1 | 0.1 |
E9 | GS | 1.5 | 0.2 |
表3 不同酿酒葡萄品种继代培养基筛选
Tab.3 Selection of subculture media for different wine grape varieties
处理编号 Process number | 培养基类型 Type of culture medium | 6-BA (mg/L) | IBA (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
E1 | MS | 0.5 | 0.1 |
E2 | MS | 1 | 0.2 |
E3 | MS | 1.5 | 0.3 |
E4 | 1/2MS | 0.5 | 0.2 |
E5 | 1/2MS | 1 | 0.3 |
E6 | 1/2MS | 1.5 | 0.1 |
E7 | GS | 0.5 | 0.3 |
E8 | GS | 1 | 0.1 |
E9 | GS | 1.5 | 0.2 |
处理编号 Process number | 培养基类型 Type of culture medium | IBA (mg/L) | NAA (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
F1 | MS | 0.2 | 0 |
F2 | MS | 0.4 | 0.2 |
F3 | MS | 0.6 | 0.4 |
F4 | 1/2MS | 0.2 | 0.2 |
F5 | 1/2MS | 0.4 | 0.4 |
F6 | 1/2MS | 0.6 | 0 |
F7 | GS | 0.2 | 0.4 |
F8 | GS | 0.4 | 0 |
F9 | GS | 0.6 | 0.2 |
表4 不同酿酒葡萄品种生根培养基筛选
Tab.4 The selection of rooting medium for different wine grape varieties
处理编号 Process number | 培养基类型 Type of culture medium | IBA (mg/L) | NAA (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|
F1 | MS | 0.2 | 0 |
F2 | MS | 0.4 | 0.2 |
F3 | MS | 0.6 | 0.4 |
F4 | 1/2MS | 0.2 | 0.2 |
F5 | 1/2MS | 0.4 | 0.4 |
F6 | 1/2MS | 0.6 | 0 |
F7 | GS | 0.2 | 0.4 |
F8 | GS | 0.4 | 0 |
F9 | GS | 0.6 | 0.2 |
处理编号 Process number | 紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | 长相思Sauvignon blanc | 小味儿多Petit verdot | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
污染率 Pollution rate(%) | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | 污染率 Pollution rate(%) | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | 污染率 Pollution rate(%) | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | |
C1 | 68.75±3.06b | 31.25±0.82b | 38.46±0.78b | 61.54±1.26a | 68.75±2.41c | 31.25±0.61d |
C2 | 81.25±1.02a | 18.75±1.77c | 40.74±0.41b | 59.26±2.82a | 75.00±2.45b | 25.00±1.63e |
C3 | 81.25±2.65a | 18.75±1.22c | 48.00±2.45a | 52.00±1.22b | 62.50±1.63d | 37.50±1.63c |
C4 | 68.75±3.06b | 31.25±1.85b | 50.00±1.63a | 50.00±4.08b | 68.75±2.41c | 31.25±2.24d |
C5 | 67.75±2.24b | 32.25±1.71b | 37.93±1.16b | 62.07±1.28a | 50.00±1.63e | 57.00±1.22a |
C6 | 62.50±2.04c | 37.50±1.67a | 39.29±1.46b | 60.71±1.80a | 75.00±2.45b | 25.00±0.41e |
C7 | 62.50±3.67c | 37.50±1.57a | 38.36±0.09b | 63.64±2.77a | 53.75±18.4e | 56.25±0.86a |
C8 | 68.75±2.24b | 31.25±1.36b | 40.00±1.63b | 60.00±3.26a | 51.00±2.04e | 50.00±1.22b |
C9 | 68.75±3.06b | 31.25±2.24b | 48.28±2.02a | 51.72±1.31b | 81.25±1.43a | 18.75±1.02f |
表5 不同处理下3个酿酒葡萄品种外植体成活率变化
Tab.5 The effect of different treatments on the survival rate of explants of 3 wine grape varieties
处理编号 Process number | 紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | 长相思Sauvignon blanc | 小味儿多Petit verdot | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
污染率 Pollution rate(%) | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | 污染率 Pollution rate(%) | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | 污染率 Pollution rate(%) | 成活率 Survival rate(%) | |
C1 | 68.75±3.06b | 31.25±0.82b | 38.46±0.78b | 61.54±1.26a | 68.75±2.41c | 31.25±0.61d |
C2 | 81.25±1.02a | 18.75±1.77c | 40.74±0.41b | 59.26±2.82a | 75.00±2.45b | 25.00±1.63e |
C3 | 81.25±2.65a | 18.75±1.22c | 48.00±2.45a | 52.00±1.22b | 62.50±1.63d | 37.50±1.63c |
C4 | 68.75±3.06b | 31.25±1.85b | 50.00±1.63a | 50.00±4.08b | 68.75±2.41c | 31.25±2.24d |
C5 | 67.75±2.24b | 32.25±1.71b | 37.93±1.16b | 62.07±1.28a | 50.00±1.63e | 57.00±1.22a |
C6 | 62.50±2.04c | 37.50±1.67a | 39.29±1.46b | 60.71±1.80a | 75.00±2.45b | 25.00±0.41e |
C7 | 62.50±3.67c | 37.50±1.57a | 38.36±0.09b | 63.64±2.77a | 53.75±18.4e | 56.25±0.86a |
C8 | 68.75±2.24b | 31.25±1.36b | 40.00±1.63b | 60.00±3.26a | 51.00±2.04e | 50.00±1.22b |
C9 | 68.75±3.06b | 31.25±2.24b | 48.28±2.02a | 51.72±1.31b | 81.25±1.43a | 18.75±1.02f |
处理编号 Process number | 紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | 长相思Sauvignon blanc | 小味儿多Petit verdot | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生根率 Rooting rate(%) | 平均生根数(条) Average number of root(twig) | 生根率 Rooting rate(%) | 平均生根数(条) Average number of root(twig) | 生根率 Rooting rate(%) | 平均生根数(条) Average number of root(twig) | |
F1 | 66.67±0.06 c | 3.67±0.27 f | 86.66±0.13 a | 5.44±3.20 d | 70.00±0.04 bcd | 10.56±1.50 b |
F2 | 81.67±0.06 ab | 8.67±1.09 e | 88.33±0.13 a | 7.83±1.04 bcd | 75.00±0.07 abcd | 11.22±4.32 b |
F3 | 83.33±0.02 ab | 15.44±1.10 cd | 86.66±0.06 a | 7.50±4.44 bcd | 76.67±0.06 abc | 14.56±1.40 ab |
F4 | 88.33±0.02 a | 18.56±2.04 abc | 83.33±0.03 a | 6.78±2.04 bcd | 80.00±0.04 ab | 16.44±6.95 ab |
F5 | 93.33±0.05 a | 20.11±0.57 a | 93.33±0.08 a | 15.83±6.30 a | 85.00±0.04 a | 21.67±1.52 a |
F6 | 85.00±0.08 ab | 13.56±1.77 d | 80.00±0.10 a | 10.67±5.51 abcd | 75.00±0.04 abcd | 11.78±1.85 b |
F7 | 90.00±0.04 a | 19.00±2.23 ab | 91.67±0.06 a | 12.56±2.87 abc | 81.67±0.02 a | 21.44±6.12 a |
F8 | 75.00±0.04 bc | 8.56±2.22 e | 85.00±0.10 a | 6.22±1.35 cd | 66.67±0.06 cd | 9.11±0.16 b |
F9 | 86.67±0.06 ab | 15.78±0.16 bcd | 90.00±0.09 a | 13.72±1.70 ab | 65.00±0.04 d | 14.00±5.00 ab |
表6 不同处理下酿酒葡萄品种生根变化
Tab.6 The effects of different treatments various varieties of wine grapes on rooting of various varieties
处理编号 Process number | 紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | 长相思Sauvignon blanc | 小味儿多Petit verdot | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生根率 Rooting rate(%) | 平均生根数(条) Average number of root(twig) | 生根率 Rooting rate(%) | 平均生根数(条) Average number of root(twig) | 生根率 Rooting rate(%) | 平均生根数(条) Average number of root(twig) | |
F1 | 66.67±0.06 c | 3.67±0.27 f | 86.66±0.13 a | 5.44±3.20 d | 70.00±0.04 bcd | 10.56±1.50 b |
F2 | 81.67±0.06 ab | 8.67±1.09 e | 88.33±0.13 a | 7.83±1.04 bcd | 75.00±0.07 abcd | 11.22±4.32 b |
F3 | 83.33±0.02 ab | 15.44±1.10 cd | 86.66±0.06 a | 7.50±4.44 bcd | 76.67±0.06 abc | 14.56±1.40 ab |
F4 | 88.33±0.02 a | 18.56±2.04 abc | 83.33±0.03 a | 6.78±2.04 bcd | 80.00±0.04 ab | 16.44±6.95 ab |
F5 | 93.33±0.05 a | 20.11±0.57 a | 93.33±0.08 a | 15.83±6.30 a | 85.00±0.04 a | 21.67±1.52 a |
F6 | 85.00±0.08 ab | 13.56±1.77 d | 80.00±0.10 a | 10.67±5.51 abcd | 75.00±0.04 abcd | 11.78±1.85 b |
F7 | 90.00±0.04 a | 19.00±2.23 ab | 91.67±0.06 a | 12.56±2.87 abc | 81.67±0.02 a | 21.44±6.12 a |
F8 | 75.00±0.04 bc | 8.56±2.22 e | 85.00±0.10 a | 6.22±1.35 cd | 66.67±0.06 cd | 9.11±0.16 b |
F9 | 86.67±0.06 ab | 15.78±0.16 bcd | 90.00±0.09 a | 13.72±1.70 ab | 65.00±0.04 d | 14.00±5.00 ab |
处理 编号 Process number | 紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | 长相思Sauvignon blanc | 小味儿多Petit verdot | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生根综 合质量 Comprehensive quality of rooting | 平均根长 Average root length (cm) | 平均根粗 Average root diameter (mm) | 生根综 合质量 Comprehensive quality of rooting | 平均根长 Average root length (cm) | 平均根粗 Average root diameter (mm) | 生根综 合质量 Comprehensive quality of rooting | 平均根长 Average root length (cm) | 平均根粗 Average root diameter (mm) | |
F1 | 2.71±0.17 g | 5.85±0.08c | 1.03±0.02 a | 4.01±1.12 cd | 8.87±0.04b | 1.47±0.05ab | 4.98±0.16 d | 7.97± 0.31a | 1.09± 0.07b |
F2 | 3.55±0.08 f | 3.91±0.03g | 1.00± 0.02a | 3.20±0.27 cd | 3.19±0.04fg | 1.58±0.31a | 4.63±0.02 e | 5.82± 0.26c | 1.25± 0.10a |
F3 | 5.36±0.09 d | 4.33± 0.09f | 1.01± 0.01a | 3.13±1.03 cd | 3.27± 0.08ef | 1.17±0.05cd | 5.34±0.08 c | 5.28± 0.13d | 0.98±0.08 bc |
F4 | 7.28±0.15 a | 8.78±0.08b | 1.14±0.04 a | 2.62±0.42 d | 2.03± 0.02h | 0.93±0.10de | 6.40±0.08 b | 6.85± 0.24b | 0.93±0.01 c |
F5 | 6.84±0.26 b | 5.39±0.09d | 1.01± 0.01a | 6.34±1.52 a | 7.67±0.06c | 1.35±0.12abc | 7.62±0.14 a | 7.09±0.07 b | 0.99± 0.08bc |
F6 | 6.15±0.04 c | 9.34± 0.09a | 1.10±0.09 a | 5.75±1.17 ab | 11.19±0.07a | 1.25±0.12bc | 5.03±0.02 d | 7.99± 0.11a | 0.89±0.08cd |
F7 | 5.80±0.20 c | 2.41±0.19h | 0.85±0.08b | 4.44±0.86 bc | 3.37± 0.04e | 0.78±0.01e | 6.41±0.11 b | 2.57± 0.31f | 0.76± 0.01de |
F8 | 3.78±0.18 f | 5.07± 0.08e | 0.69±0.13 c | 3.38±0.69 cd | 5.59± 0.15d | 0.88±0.01e | 3.45±0.12 f | 3.36±0.04e | 0.57± 0.02f |
F9 | 4.91±0.27 e | 2.13±0.04 i | 0.69±0.06 c | 4.64±0.40 bc | 3.05± 0.04g | 0.73±0.05e | 4.43±0.25 e | 2.42± 0.16f | 0.64± 0.07ef |
表7 不同处理下3个酿酒葡萄品种生根综合质量变化
Tab.7 The effects of different treatments on the comprehensive rooting quality of three wine grape varieties
处理 编号 Process number | 紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | 长相思Sauvignon blanc | 小味儿多Petit verdot | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生根综 合质量 Comprehensive quality of rooting | 平均根长 Average root length (cm) | 平均根粗 Average root diameter (mm) | 生根综 合质量 Comprehensive quality of rooting | 平均根长 Average root length (cm) | 平均根粗 Average root diameter (mm) | 生根综 合质量 Comprehensive quality of rooting | 平均根长 Average root length (cm) | 平均根粗 Average root diameter (mm) | |
F1 | 2.71±0.17 g | 5.85±0.08c | 1.03±0.02 a | 4.01±1.12 cd | 8.87±0.04b | 1.47±0.05ab | 4.98±0.16 d | 7.97± 0.31a | 1.09± 0.07b |
F2 | 3.55±0.08 f | 3.91±0.03g | 1.00± 0.02a | 3.20±0.27 cd | 3.19±0.04fg | 1.58±0.31a | 4.63±0.02 e | 5.82± 0.26c | 1.25± 0.10a |
F3 | 5.36±0.09 d | 4.33± 0.09f | 1.01± 0.01a | 3.13±1.03 cd | 3.27± 0.08ef | 1.17±0.05cd | 5.34±0.08 c | 5.28± 0.13d | 0.98±0.08 bc |
F4 | 7.28±0.15 a | 8.78±0.08b | 1.14±0.04 a | 2.62±0.42 d | 2.03± 0.02h | 0.93±0.10de | 6.40±0.08 b | 6.85± 0.24b | 0.93±0.01 c |
F5 | 6.84±0.26 b | 5.39±0.09d | 1.01± 0.01a | 6.34±1.52 a | 7.67±0.06c | 1.35±0.12abc | 7.62±0.14 a | 7.09±0.07 b | 0.99± 0.08bc |
F6 | 6.15±0.04 c | 9.34± 0.09a | 1.10±0.09 a | 5.75±1.17 ab | 11.19±0.07a | 1.25±0.12bc | 5.03±0.02 d | 7.99± 0.11a | 0.89±0.08cd |
F7 | 5.80±0.20 c | 2.41±0.19h | 0.85±0.08b | 4.44±0.86 bc | 3.37± 0.04e | 0.78±0.01e | 6.41±0.11 b | 2.57± 0.31f | 0.76± 0.01de |
F8 | 3.78±0.18 f | 5.07± 0.08e | 0.69±0.13 c | 3.38±0.69 cd | 5.59± 0.15d | 0.88±0.01e | 3.45±0.12 f | 3.36±0.04e | 0.57± 0.02f |
F9 | 4.91±0.27 e | 2.13±0.04 i | 0.69±0.06 c | 4.64±0.40 bc | 3.05± 0.04g | 0.73±0.05e | 4.43±0.25 e | 2.42± 0.16f | 0.64± 0.07ef |
品种 Varieties | 检测病毒类型The detect virus type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRaV-1 | GLRaV-3 | GLRaV-5 | GVA | GFkV | GFLV | |
黑比诺Pinot noir | — | — | — | + | — | — |
桑娇维塞Sangiovese | — | — | — | + | — | — |
霞多丽Chardonnay | — | — | — | + | — | — |
马尔贝克Malbec | — | — | — | + | — | — |
长相思Sauvignon blanc | — | — | — | + | — | — |
小味儿多Petit verdot | — | — | — | — | — | — |
紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | — | — | — | — | — | — |
表8 几个酿酒葡萄品种病毒检测结果
Tab.8 The virus detection results of several wine grape varieties
品种 Varieties | 检测病毒类型The detect virus type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRaV-1 | GLRaV-3 | GLRaV-5 | GVA | GFkV | GFLV | |
黑比诺Pinot noir | — | — | — | + | — | — |
桑娇维塞Sangiovese | — | — | — | + | — | — |
霞多丽Chardonnay | — | — | — | + | — | — |
马尔贝克Malbec | — | — | — | + | — | — |
长相思Sauvignon blanc | — | — | — | + | — | — |
小味儿多Petit verdot | — | — | — | — | — | — |
紫大夫Dunkelfelder T | — | — | — | — | — | — |
[1] | 韦伟, 单守明. 葡萄脱毒与快繁技术研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(1):259-265. |
WEI Wei, SHAN Shouming. Research Progress on Virus-free Grape and Rapid Propagation Technology[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(1):259-265. | |
[2] | 胡泽军, 张亚红, 张晓煜, 等. 宁夏贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄不同子产区土壤肥力特征与评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(6):35-41. |
HU Zejun, ZHANG Yahong, ZHANG Xiaoyu, et al. Characteristics and evaluation of soil fertility in different grape production areas at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain,Ningxia[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,(6):35-41. | |
[3] | 朱峰, 杨微. 宁夏贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄产业发展措施探讨[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018,(21):98,101. |
ZHU Feng, YANG Wei. Discussion on the development measures of wine grape industry at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain in Ningxia[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018,(21):98,101. | |
[4] | 刘世松. 进口葡萄酒对我国葡萄酒产业的影响及对策[J]. 中国市场, 2011,(45):157-163. |
LIU Shisong. Influence of imported wine on Chinese wine industry and Its Countermeasures[J]. China Market, 2011,(45):157-163. | |
[5] | 齐向丽, 师校欣, 杜国强. ‘红国王’葡萄组织培养快速繁殖[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(3):982-987. |
QI Xiangli, SHI Xiaoxin, DU Guoqiang. Rapid Propagation of ‘Hongguowang’ Grape Tissue Culture in Vitro[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(3):982-987. | |
[6] | 沈传进, 王利民, 张平, 等. 鲜食葡萄组织培养快速繁育系统的建立[J]. 河北农业科学, 2011, 15(7):16-21. |
SHEN Chuanjin, WANG Limin, ZHANG Ping, et al. Tissue culture rapid proliferation system establishment of table Grape[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 15(7):16-21. | |
[7] | 林茜, 高营营, 覃换玲, 等. ‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄组培脱毒快繁技术研究[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(3):435-443. |
LIN Qian, GAO Yingying, QIN Huanling, et al. Study on the technology of virus-free and rapid propagation of ‘Shine Muscat’grape in tissue culture[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(3):435-443. | |
[8] | 闵首军, 李爱玲. 葡萄组织快繁技术研究[J]. 农学学报, 2012, 2(10):55-57,67. |
MIN Shoujun, LI Ailing. Study on Rapid Propagation Technology of Grape Tissues[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2012, 2(10):55-57,67.
DOI |
|
[9] | 王婷, 肖慧琳, 唐美玲, 等. ‘黑虎香’葡萄离体快繁技术研究[J]. 烟台果树, 2020,(1):17-18. |
WANG Ting, XIAO Huiling, TANG Meiling, et al. Study on in vitro Rapid Propagation of ‘Heihuxiang’ grape[J]. Yantai Fruits, 2020,(1):17-18. | |
[10] |
蔡文博, 段虹, 王军, 等. 4个鲜食葡萄品种组培快繁体系的建立[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(2):248-254.
DOI |
CAI Wenbo, DUAN Hong, WANG Jun, et al. Establishment of in vitro rapid micropropagation of four table grape cultivars[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(2):248-254.
DOI |
|
[11] | 冯文华, 代红军. ‘赤霞珠’葡萄组培快繁体系研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2016, 40(13):104-106. |
FENG Wenhua, DAI Hongjun. Study on tissue culture and rapid propagation system of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016, 40(13):104-106. | |
[12] | 刘娜, 许轲, 张文, 等. 四个酿酒葡萄品种组培快繁体系的初建[J]. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49(10):1071-1076. |
LIU Na, XU Ke, ZHANG Wen, et al. Preliminary establishment of in vitro rapid micropropagation of four grape-wine(Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2013, 49(10):1071-1076. | |
[13] | 徐美隆, 刘静, 王巧珍, 等. 酿酒葡萄‘赤霞珠’组织培养快繁技术优化[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(22):117-120. |
XU Meilong, LIU Jing, WANG Qiaozhen. Optimization of Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Grape[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(22):117-120. | |
[14] | 王婷, 卢建声, 唐美玲, 等. 蛇龙珠组培繁殖试验初报[J]. 烟台果树, 2019,(1):9-10. |
WANG Ting, LU Jiansheng, TANG Meiling, et al. Preliminary report on tissue culture and propagation of Rosa laevigata[J]. Yantai Fruits, 2019,(1):9-10. | |
[15] | 李琴, 舒木林, 甘祖燕, 等. 大花美人蕉种子高效无菌萌发及离体快繁体系的建立[J]. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(4):667-676. |
LI Qin, SHU Mulin, GAN Zuyan, et al. Establishment of efficient seed germination and in vitro rapid propagation system of Canna generalis[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2022, 58(4):667-676. | |
[16] | 叶伟, 刘凉琴, 史学正, 等. 基质中添加多孔改良剂对南方高丛蓝浆果品种‘蓝美1号’组培苗茎段瓶外生根的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(3):69-71. |
YE Wei, LIU Liangqin, SHI Xuezheng, et al. Effects of substrate complemented with porous soil amendment on ex vitro rooting of stem segments of tissue culture seedlings of Vaccinium corymbosum‘Lanmei 1’[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2020, 29(3):69-71. | |
[17] | 陈卫平, 尚红莺, 周军, 等. 贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄的生态适应性[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(9):1855-1860. |
CHEN Weiping, SHANG Hongying, ZHOU Jun, et al. Ecological Adaptability of Wine Grape at the Eastern Foot of Helan Mountain[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2007, 27(9):1855-1860. | |
[18] | 胡文斌, 张少飞, 孙娜. 陇南红提葡萄茎段组织培养研究[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2018, 46(1):6-9. |
HU Wenbin, ZHANG Shaofei, SUN Na. Stem Tissue Culture of Red Grape in Longnan Area[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2018, 46(1):6-9. | |
[19] | 陈玉霞, 邱建辉, 谷峰. 葡萄新品种组织培养快繁技术研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(4):106-109. |
CHEN Yuxia, QIU Jianjun, GU Feng. Study on Tissue Culture Rapid Propagation Technology of New Grape Varieties[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(4):106-109. | |
[20] | 刘晓芹, 冯美, 王振平, 等. 葡萄砧木组培快繁研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(17):8866-8868,8876. |
LIU Xiaoqin, FENG Mei, WANG Zhenping, et al. Study on Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation of Grape Rootstock[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(17):8866-8868,8876. | |
[21] |
Miransari M, Smith D L. Plant hormones and seed germination[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2014, 99:110-121.
DOI URL |
[22] | 苏玲, 宫磊, 尹向田, 等. 贵妃玫瑰葡萄组培技术探究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(8):51-53,65. |
SU Ling, GONG Lei, YIN Xiangtian, et al. Study on Tissue Culture Technology of the Guifeimeigui Grape[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(8):51-53,65. | |
[23] | 齐永顺, 张志华, 王同坤, 等. 同源四倍体玫瑰香葡萄嫩枝扦插不定根发生过程中内源激素的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(4):565-570. |
QI Yongshun, ZHANG Zhihua, WANG Tongkun, et al. Changes of Endogenous Hormones in Adventitious Root Formation in Softwood Cuttings of Autotetraploid Grape Muscat Hamburg[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009, 36(4):565-570. | |
[24] | 张尊平, 范旭东, 胡国君, 等. 葡萄试管苗热处理脱毒技术研究[J]. 中国果树, 2013,(1):39-41. |
ZHANG Zunping, FAN Xudong, HU Guojun, et al. Study on virus-free treatment technology of grape testtube seedlings[J]. China Fruits, 2013,(1):39-41. |
[1] | 沈晓贺, 朱占江, 杨莉玲, 刘佳, 阿布力孜·巴斯提. 新疆酿酒葡萄生产机械化现状与发展趋势[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 147-152. |
[2] | 户金鸽, 白世践, 陈光, 蔡军社. 不同地面覆盖方式对酿酒葡萄品种马瑟兰果实品质的影响及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1131-1139. |
[3] | 付强, 王琴, 徐彩芹, 牛俊丽, 牛建新, 王建友. 黑核桃组培中消毒及防止褐化最适浓度分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1499-1505. |
[4] | 白世践, 户金鸽, 薛锋, 张雯, 谢辉, 赵荣华, 陈光, 蔡军社. 结果高度对‘厂’形栽培葡萄果穗微域环境、果实发育及酒品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1907-1918. |
[5] | 杨静, 王为然, 王萌, 朱家辉, 宁新民, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 闵玲, 孔杰. 新疆海岛棉胚性愈伤组织培养体系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1321-1329. |
[6] | 张莉, 杨晓龙, 王海亮, 南珊珊, 马雪儿, 聂存喜, 张文举, 陈程. 一株棉酚降解菌株的筛选鉴定及对棉粕的脱毒效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3057-3065. |
[7] | 钟海霞, 丁祥, 周晓明, 潘明启, 张付春, 韩守安, 张雯, 谢辉, 王敏, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 伍新宇. 新疆10个酿酒葡萄品种(系)可溶性糖组分及含量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(7): 1323-1331. |
[8] | 路洁, 闫鹏科, 马婷慧, 王锐. 有机替代对土壤特性及酿酒葡萄根活力和浆果品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8): 1465-1473. |
[9] | 王伟, 布丽根·加冷别克, 胡晓东, 夏俊芳, 张志东, 顾美英, 武运. 基于高通量测序技术的酿酒葡萄产区土壤微生物多样性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5): 859-868. |
[10] | 杨文婷, 陈程, 张文举. 棉酚降解酶对棉籽粕酶解脱毒的条件参数优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(6): 1122-1126. |
[11] | 彭媛媛, 高展, 董凯向, 周龙, 杜展成. 不同采收期对新疆焉耆盆地酿酒葡萄及葡萄酒品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(7): 1252-1263. |
[12] | 周茜萍;王梦瑶;吕新华;祝建波;孙黎. 两种油葵自交系再生体系的建立[J]. , 2017, 54(7): 1208-1215. |
[13] | 韩宏伟;廖晴;玛尔哈巴·吾斯满;王浩;庄红梅;王强;沙红. 德国鸢尾组培快繁过程中内生菌的分离、鉴定及控制药剂筛选[J]. , 2017, 54(4): 652-659. |
[14] | 周霞, 夏红梅, 贾永钊, 徐叶挺, 韩宏伟, 王志明, 廖志立. 金钻蔓绿绒的组培苗繁殖生产技术研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(12): 2227-2231. |
[15] | 侯敏;包慧芳;王宁;詹发强;杨蓉;龙宣杞;崔卫东. 高效降解棉酚菌株的筛选及脱毒条件的研究[J]. , 2016, 53(6): 1114-1121. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||