深松深度对棉花冠层光合特征及产量的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.003

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 2878-2884.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·土壤肥料 • 上一篇下一篇

深松深度对棉花冠层光合特征及产量的影响

马君¹(), 王静², 李春艳³, 王亮¹, 师维军¹, 崔建平¹, 田立文¹(), 郭仁松¹()

1.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所/农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆农业广播电视学校,乌鲁木齐 830052
3.新疆维吾尔自治区农业技术推广总站,乌鲁木齐 830000

收稿日期:2023-04-08 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2024-01-03
作者简介:马君(1983-),男,甘肃武威人,副研究员,研究方向为棉花栽培与种质资源,(E-mail)125329076@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31860358);农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室开放课题(25107020-201804);新疆农业科学院青年骨干创新能力培养基金项目(xjnkq-2019012);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2020D01B36);国家棉花产业技术体系喀什综合试验站(CARS-15-50)

Effect of subsoiling depth on canopy photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton

MA Jun¹(), WANG Jing², LI Chunyan³, WANG Liang¹, SHI Weijun¹, CUI Jianping¹, TIAN Liwen¹(), GUO Rensong¹()

1. Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiological Ecology and Tillage of Desert Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Urumqi 830091, China
2. Xinjiang Agricultural Radio and Television School, Urumqi 830052, China
3. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Urumqi 830000, China

Received:2023-04-08 Published:2023-12-20 Online:2024-01-03
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China Projects(31860358);Key Laboratory of Physiological Ecology and Cultivation of Desert Oasis Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs(25107020-201804);Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Young Backbone Innovation Capacity Training Fund Projects(xjnkq-2019012);Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2020D01B36);National Cotton Industry Technology System Projects(CARS-15-50)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】在新疆自然生态条件下,研究深松深度对棉花冠层光合特征及产量的影响,为进一步分析深松对棉花产量的调节作用提供理论依据。【方法】以新陆中88号为材料,在常年翻耕棉田设置不深松(CK)、深松30 cm(S₁)、深松40 cm(S₂)、深松50 cm(S₃)4个处理,研究不同深松深度对棉花关键生育期冠层结构、光合特征及干物质积累和产量的影响。【结果】棉花叶面积指数生育期呈单峰曲线,盛花期叶面积指数达到峰值,深松处理较CK增加0.92%~12.94%。叶倾角和冠层开度变化趋势与叶面积指数相反,盛花期为最小值,深松较CK叶倾角增加1.86%~5.29%,冠层开度降低32.7%~59.1%。初花期净光合速率随深松深度增加呈增大趋势,而蒸腾速率和气孔导度则以S₂最高,盛花期和盛铃期净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度分别以S₂、S₃最高,但S₂和S₃差异不显著(P>0.05)。深松处理干物质快速积累起始期较CK提前1~3 d,持续期延长2~4 d,最大积累速率提高2.18%~18.01%,单铃重增加3.58%~9.12%,籽棉产量增加11.02%~21.93%,其中以深松40 cm最高。【结论】深松40 cm(S₂)结合常规翻耕措施,可有效改善棉花冠层结构,促进叶片光合作用,提高干物质积累强度,提升籽棉产量。

关键词: 棉花; 深松; 冠层结构; 光合特征; 干物质积累

Abstract:

【Objective】Under the natural ecological conditions in Xinjiang, the effects of subsoiling depth on photosynthetic characteristics of the cotton canopy and yield were investigated to provide the theoretical basis for further clarifying the regulation effect of subsoiling on cotton yield.【Methods】The Xinluzhong No.88 variety was used as the experimental material and four treatments, no subsoiling (CK), subsoiling 30 cm (S₁), subsoiling 40 cm (S₂), and subsoiling 50 cm (S₃), were set up in the perennial tillage cotton field to examine the effects of different subsoiling depths on canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield of cotton at key growth stages.【Results】The leaf area index and growth period of cotton showed a single peak curve, and the leaf area index reached the peak at the full flowering stage, where the leaf area index of subsoiling treatment increased by 0.92%-12.94% compared with CK.However, the trends of leaf inclination and the degree of canopy opening were opposite to that of the leaf area index, and the minimum value was found at the flowering stage.Compared with CK, the leaf inclination of subsoiling increased by 1.86%-5.29%, and the degree of canopy opening decreases by 32.7%-59.1%.The net photosynthetic rate at the early flowering stage increased with the depth of subsoiling, while the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were the highest in S₂.The net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance at full flowering and full boll stage were the highest in S₂ and S₃, respectively, while there was no significant difference between S₂ and S₃ (P>0.05).Compared with CK, the initial stage of rapid accumulation of dry matter in subsoiling treatment was 1-3 days earlier than that in CK, and the duration was extended to 2-4 days.The maximum accumulation rate increased by 2.18%-18.01%, the boll weight increased by 3.58%-9.12%, and the seed cotton yield increased by 11.02%-21.93%, among which subsoiling 40 cm is the highest.【Conclusion】The combination of subsoiling with a depth of 40 cm(S₂) and conventional tillage can effectively improve cotton canopy structure, promote leaf photosynthesis, increase dry matter accumulation intensity of cotton, and increase seed cotton yield.

Key words: cotton; subsoiling; canopy structure; photosynthetic characteristics; dry matter accumulation

中图分类号:

S562

马君, 王静, 李春艳, 王亮, 师维军, 崔建平, 田立文, 郭仁松. 深松深度对棉花冠层光合特征及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2878-2884.

MA Jun, WANG Jing, LI Chunyan, WANG Liang, SHI Weijun, CUI Jianping, TIAN Liwen, GUO Rensong. Effect of subsoiling depth on canopy photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2878-2884.

图/表 8

参考文献 19

[1]	刘雪花, 支金虎, 柴朝晖, 等. 连作障碍消减措施对棉花产量形成和化感自毒作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3):509-520. DOI
	LIU Xuehua, ZHI Jinhu, CHAI Zhaohui, et al. Effects of different abatement measures of continuous cropping obstacle on yield formation and allelopathic autotoxicity of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(3):509-520. DOI
[2]	李子玉, 张小均, 刘慧, 等. 新疆绿洲连作棉田土壤活性有机氮组分的变化[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 40(3):291-296. DOI
	LI Ziyu, ZAHNG Xiaojun, LIU Hui, et al. The change about soil active organic nitrogen of continuous cropping cotton fields in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Shihezi University(Natural Science), 2022, 40(3):291-296.
[3]	王亮, 郭仁松, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 等. 深松深度对南疆滴灌棉田水分利用效率与产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(20):144-152.
	WANG Liang, GUO Rensong, Wumaierjiang Kuerban, et al. Effects of subsoiling depth on water use efficiency and yield of cotton field under drip irrigation in south Xinjiang, China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(20):144-152.
[4]	王富贵, 于晓芳, 高聚林, 等. 不同类型玉米品种冠层结构及其光合特性对深松增密的响应[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(2):33-44.
	WANG Fugui, YU Xiaofang, GAO Julin, et al. Response of canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics of different maize varieties to subsoiling tillage and increasing density[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Nat.sci.Ed.), 2019, 47(2):33-44.
[5]	Satendra Kumar, Saini S K, Amit Bhatnagar. Effect of Subsoiling and Preparatory Tillage on Sugar Yield, Juice Quality and Economics of Sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid) in Sugarcane Plant-Ratoon Cropping System[J]. Society for Sugar Research & Promotion, 2012, 14(4):398-404.
[6]	张总正, 秦淑俊, 李娜, 等. 深松和施氮对夏玉米产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4):790-798.
	Zhang Zongzheng, Qin Shujun, LI Na, et al. Effects of subsoiling and N fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency and yield of summer maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(4):790-798.
[7]	李雪霏, 刘明, 张卫建, 等. 不同深松方式与氮肥运筹对玉米生长发育及光合特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(1):120-124.
	LI Xuefei, LIU Ming, ZHANG Weijian, et al. Effect of different deep loosening modes and nitrogen fertilizer supply way on growth and photosynthetic characteristics in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(1):120-124.
[8]	Haytham M Salem, Constantino Valero, Miguel Ángel Muñoz, et al. Short-term effects of four tillage practices on soil physical properties, soil water potential, and maize yield[J]. Geoderma, 2015, 237/238(1):60-70. DOI URL
[9]	杜明伟, 姚炎帝, 罗宏海, 等. 新疆杂交棉超高产冠层结构特征及群体光合性能研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2008, 45(S2):12-19.
	DU Mingwei, YAO Yandi, LUO Honghai, et al. Studying on the canopy structure and photosynthesis potential of population hybrid cotton fields with high yield[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 45(S2):12-19.
[10]	张昊, 林涛, 汤秋香, 等. 种植模式对机采棉冠层光能利用与产量形成的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(12):54-63.
	Zhang Hao, Lin Tao, Tang Qiuxiang, et al. Effects of planting pattern on canopy light utilization and yield formation in machine-harvested cotton field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(12):54-63.
[11]	王全九, 王康, 苏李君, 等. 灌溉施氮和种植密度对棉花叶面积指数与产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(12):300-312.
	WANG Quanjiu, WANG Kang, SU Lijun, et al. Effect of Irrigation Amount,Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Cotton Leaf Area Index and Yield[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(12):300-312.
[12]	王春雷. 深松对不同种植密度下春玉米冠层光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2020, 48(6):22-29. DOI
	WANG Chunlei. Effects of soil subsoiling on canopy photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring maize under different planting densities[J]. Journal of northern agriculyure, 2020, 48(6):22-29.
[13]	尹斌, 高聚林, 王志刚, 等. 高产春玉米灌浆期碳氮积累、转运及叶片衰老特性对深松深度的响应[J]. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(2):98-103.
	YIN Bin, GAO Julin, WANG Zhigang, et al. Response on Carbon-nitrogen Accumulation and Transportation and Leaf Senescence Characters of High Yield SpringMaize by Subsoiling Depth in Filling Stage[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(2):98-103.
[14]	许菁, 贺贞昆, 冯倩倩, 等. 耕作方式对冬小麦-夏玉米光合特性及周年产量形成的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1):101-109.
	XU Jing, HE Zhenkun, FENG Qianqian, et al. Effect of tillage method on photosynthetic characteristics and annual yield formation of winter wheat-summer maize cropping system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(1):101-109.
[15]	胡树平, 孟天天, 赵卉, 等. 深松对向日葵光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(1):116-120.
	Hu Shuping, Meng Tiantian, Zhao Hui, et al. Effects of subsoiling on photosynthetic performance and yield of sunflower[J]. Crops, 2019,(1):116-120.
[16]	晋鹏宇, 任伟, 陶洪斌, 等. 深松对夏玉米物质生产、光合性能及根系生长的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(1):114-120.
	JIN Pengyu, REN Wei, TAO Hongbin, et al. Effects of subsoiling on dry matter production, photosynthetic performance and root development of summer maize[J]. Maize Science, 2014, 22(1):114-120.
[17]	Schneider F, Don A, Hennings I, et al. The effect of deep tillage on crop yield-What do we really know[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2017, 174:193-204. DOI URL
[18]	郑成岩, 于振文, 张永丽, 等. 土壤深松和补灌对小麦干物质生产及水分利用率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(7) :2260-2271.
	ZHENG Chengyan, YU Zhenwen, ZHANG Yongli, et al. Effects of subsoiling and supplemental irrigation on dry matter production and water use efficiency in wheat. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(7) :2260-2271. DOI URL
[19]	赵亚丽, 刘卫玲, 程思贤, 等. 深松(耕)方式对砂姜黑土耕层特性、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(13):2489-2503. DOI
	ZHAO Yali, LIU Weiling, CHENG Sixian, et al. Effects of pattern of deep tillage on topsoil features, yield and water use efficiency in lime concretion black soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(13):2489-2503. DOI

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	10	0	0	87

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	55	42
比例	57%	43%

摘要

306

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	306

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	109	197
比例	36%	64%

年份 Years	处理 Treat- ments	模拟方程 Simulation equations	t₀	t₁	t₂	Δt	最大积累速率 Vm (kg/ (hm²·d))	干物质积累特征值 GT (kg/hm²)	R²
年份 Years	处理 Treat- ments	模拟方程 Simulation equations	(d)				最大积累速率 Vm (kg/ (hm²·d))	干物质积累特征值 GT (kg/hm²)	R²
2019	CK	y=17 309.708 2/(1+e⁽⁶^.^{145 9-0}^.^{076 8}^t⁾)	80	63	97	34	332.39	11 398.44	0.999 5
	S₁	y=20 675.030 2/(1+e⁽⁵^.^{404 2-0}^.^{061 2}^t⁾)	88	67	110	43	316.71	13 614.51	0.999 7
	S₂	y=22 537.336 2/(1+e⁽⁵^.^{629 1-0}^.^{067 8}^t⁾)	83	64	102	39	382.50	14 840.84	0.999 3
	S₃	y=22 870.000 8/(1+e⁽⁵^.^{852 5-0}^.^{066 9}^t⁾)	87	68	107	39	382.98	15 059.90	0.999 9
2020	CK	y=20 070.107 1/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{639 6-0}^.^{083 7}^t⁾)	91	76	107	31	420.01	13 216.17	0.976 3
	S₁	y=21 202.263 7/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{841 9-0}^.^{085 2}^t⁾)	92	77	107	31	452.08	13 961.69	0.983 3
	S₂	y=24 308.204 7/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{449 6-0}^.^{083 2}^t⁾)	90	74	105	32	505.42	16 006.95	0.983 8
	S₃	y=23 306.083 2/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{078 2-0}^.^{079 32}^t⁾)	89	73	106	33	462.16	15 347.06	0.989 0

年份 Years	处理 Treat- ments	模拟方程 Simulation equations	t₀	t₁	t₂	Δt	最大积累速率 Vm (kg/ (hm²·d))	干物质积累特征值 GT (kg/hm²)	R²
年份 Years	处理 Treat- ments	模拟方程 Simulation equations	(d)				最大积累速率 Vm (kg/ (hm²·d))	干物质积累特征值 GT (kg/hm²)	R²
2019	CK	y=17 309.708 2/(1+e⁽⁶^.^{145 9-0}^.^{076 8}^t⁾)	80	63	97	34	332.39	11 398.44	0.999 5
	S₁	y=20 675.030 2/(1+e⁽⁵^.^{404 2-0}^.^{061 2}^t⁾)	88	67	110	43	316.71	13 614.51	0.999 7
	S₂	y=22 537.336 2/(1+e⁽⁵^.^{629 1-0}^.^{067 8}^t⁾)	83	64	102	39	382.50	14 840.84	0.999 3
	S₃	y=22 870.000 8/(1+e⁽⁵^.^{852 5-0}^.^{066 9}^t⁾)	87	68	107	39	382.98	15 059.90	0.999 9
2020	CK	y=20 070.107 1/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{639 6-0}^.^{083 7}^t⁾)	91	76	107	31	420.01	13 216.17	0.976 3
	S₁	y=21 202.263 7/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{841 9-0}^.^{085 2}^t⁾)	92	77	107	31	452.08	13 961.69	0.983 3
	S₂	y=24 308.204 7/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{449 6-0}^.^{083 2}^t⁾)	90	74	105	32	505.42	16 006.95	0.983 8
	S₃	y=23 306.083 2/(1+e⁽⁷^.^{078 2-0}^.^{079 32}^t⁾)	89	73	106	33	462.16	15 347.06	0.989 0

年份 Years	处理 Treatments	收获株数 Number of harvests (10⁴株/hm²)	单株铃数 Boll number per plant (个/株)	单铃重 Boll weight (g)	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Cotton yield (kg/hm²)	皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm²)
2019	CK	19.61^c	4.99^b	5.39^b	45.70^a	5 275.96^c	2 411.11^c
	S₁	20.40^b	5.08^ab	5.54^ab	45.72^a	5 741.21^b	2 624.69^b
	S₂	21.25^a	5.10^a	5.70^a	45.99^a	6 177.38^a	2 840.82^a
	S₃	20.93^a	5.10^a	5.67^a	45.61^a	6 058.33^a	2 763.10^a
2020	CK	20.10^a	4.53^b	4.95^c	46.27^a	4 507.12^c	2 085.45^c
	S₁	20.35^a	4.85^ab	5.17^b	46.51^a	5 102.66^b	2 373.25^b
	S₂	20.35^a	5.05^a	5.56^a	46.30^a	5 713.87^a	2 645.52^a
	S₃	20.20^a	5.03^a	5.61^a	46.84^a	5 700.10^a	2 669.93^a

年份 Years	处理 Treatments	收获株数 Number of harvests (10⁴株/hm²)	单株铃数 Boll number per plant (个/株)	单铃重 Boll weight (g)	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Cotton yield (kg/hm²)	皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm²)
2019	CK	19.61^c	4.99^b	5.39^b	45.70^a	5 275.96^c	2 411.11^c
	S₁	20.40^b	5.08^ab	5.54^ab	45.72^a	5 741.21^b	2 624.69^b
	S₂	21.25^a	5.10^a	5.70^a	45.99^a	6 177.38^a	2 840.82^a
	S₃	20.93^a	5.10^a	5.67^a	45.61^a	6 058.33^a	2 763.10^a
2020	CK	20.10^a	4.53^b	4.95^c	46.27^a	4 507.12^c	2 085.45^c
	S₁	20.35^a	4.85^ab	5.17^b	46.51^a	5 102.66^b	2 373.25^b
	S₂	20.35^a	5.05^a	5.56^a	46.30^a	5 713.87^a	2 645.52^a
	S₃	20.20^a	5.03^a	5.61^a	46.84^a	5 700.10^a	2 669.93^a

深松深度对棉花冠层光合特征及产量的影响

Effect of subsoiling depth on canopy photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

[1]	苗红萍, 王晓伟, 田聪华, 李志, 张玉新, 戴俊生. 塔里木河流域棉花生产与布局演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226.
[2]	王俊铎, 崔豫疆, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产优势区域分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69.
[3]	郑巨云, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 耿世伟, 孙丰磊, 阳妮, 李雪源, 王俊铎. 新疆机采棉花生产关键技术模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74.
[4]	李杰, 刘佳, 王亮, 张娜, 杨延龙, 郑子漂, 魏鑫, 王萌, 周子馨, 阳妮, 龚照龙, 侯献飞, 黄启秀, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 张济鹏, 张鹏忠. “棉、油、糖”科技成果转化现状及应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94.
[5]	扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100.
[6]	李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102.
[7]	张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[8]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[9]	黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[10]	王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[11]	张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[12]	董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844.
[13]	赖成霞, 杨延龙, 李春平, 玛依拉·玉素音, 王燕, 杨栋, 阳妮, 葛风伟, 汪鹏龙, 马君. 落叶型棉花黄萎病的生物学特征及药剂防治分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2034-2042.
[14]	刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
[15]	杨明花, 刘强, 冯国瑞, 廖必勇, 达吾来·杰克山, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 陈艳萍. 鲜食糯玉米适宜采收期与籽粒含水量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1626-1630.