

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 865-871.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.010
董秀丽1,2(
), 韩登旭1,3, 杨杰1,3, 阿布来提·阿布拉1(
), 戴爱梅2(
), 李俊杰2, 王业建1, 刘俊1, 郗浩江1, 梁晓玲1, 李铭东1
收稿日期:2022-07-30
出版日期:2023-04-20
发布日期:2023-05-06
通信作者:
阿布来提·阿布拉(1968-),男,新疆喀什人,研究员,研究方向为玉米遗传育种,(E-mail)abletabl@163.com;作者简介:董秀丽(1983-),女,新疆温泉人,高级农艺师,研究方向为作物栽培,(E-mail)276007481@qq.cm
基金资助:
DONG Xiuli1,2(
), HAN Dengxu1,3, YANG Jie1,3, Abuleti Abula1(
), DAI Aimei2(
), LI Junjie2, WANG Yejian1, LIU Jun1, XI Haojiang1, LIANG Xiaoling1, LI Mingdong1
Received:2022-07-30
Published:2023-04-20
Online:2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
Abuleti abula (1968-),male,kashgar,xinjiang,researcher,research direction: maize genetics and breeding,(E-mail) abletabl@163.com;Supported by:摘要:
【目的】研究新疆北疆地区玉米品种密植条件下的株高、穗位高、穗长、穗粒数、穗粒重、脱粒含水量等主要农艺性状和产量的变化,找出该地区密植条件下玉米产量的主要因子,为筛选出适宜新疆北疆地区种植的耐密高产优质的玉米品种提供科学依据。【方法】采用北疆18个中熟玉米品种为材料,在10.5×104株/hm2密度下,分析各参试玉米品种产量及主要农艺性状。【结果】在密植条件下各参试品种产量差异极显著;产量与行粒数(r=0.565*)、百粒重(r=0.485*)呈显著正相关;18个玉米品种的9个农艺性状可以解释85.6%的产量变异;优化后的线性回归方程为Y=-16.391+0.469X6+0.33X8。【结论】新疆北疆博州地区密植条件下选择玉米品种时,选择穗长稍长、穗粒重较大、百粒重较重且脱水快的品种,华西704,登海1707和华西917可作为新疆博州地区中熟春播地膜玉米栽培选择品种。
中图分类号:
董秀丽, 韩登旭, 杨杰, 阿布来提·阿布拉, 戴爱梅, 李俊杰, 王业建, 刘俊, 郗浩江, 梁晓玲, 李铭东. 密植条件下玉米主要农艺性状的综合性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 865-871.
DONG Xiuli, HAN Dengxu, YANG Jie, Abuleti Abula, DAI Aimei, LI Junjie, WANG Yejian, LIU Jun, XI Haojiang, LIANG Xiaoling, LI Mingdong. Comprehensive analysis of main agronomic traits of maize[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 865-871.
| 变异来源 Variance source | 平方和 Squariance | df | 均方 Mean square | F | 显著性 significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 组间Between experimental groups | 334.342 | 17 | 19.667 | 39.197 | 0.00 |
| 组内Within the experimental group | 18.063 | 36 | 0.502 | ||
| 总数Total | 352.406 | 53 |
表1 产量结果方差
Tab.1 Variance analysis of yield result
| 变异来源 Variance source | 平方和 Squariance | df | 均方 Mean square | F | 显著性 significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 组间Between experimental groups | 334.342 | 17 | 19.667 | 39.197 | 0.00 |
| 组内Within the experimental group | 18.063 | 36 | 0.502 | ||
| 总数Total | 352.406 | 53 |
| 序号 Code | 品种名称 Variety name | 小区产量 Plot yield (kg) | 折合产量 Equivalent yield (kg/hm2) | 比CK增减 Increase compared with CK ± (%) | 产量位次 Yield rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||||
| 1 | 康地5184 | 16.68 | 15.63 | 15.92 | 13 397.89fGH | -24.18 | 17 |
| 2 | 新农001 | 21.55 | 20.19 | 20.44 | 17 273.09bcBCD | -2.25 | 5 |
| 3 | 亿科9158 | 15.72 | 13.69 | 14.33 | 12 150.61gH | -31.24 | 18 |
| 4 | 西亚3090 | 21.31 | 20.56 | 20.23 | 17 250.86bcBCD | -2.37 | 6 |
| 5 | 华西917 | 21.98 | 21.13 | 22.00 | 18 087.02bAB | 2.36 | 3 |
| 6 | 华西918 | 18.08 | 19.75 | 18.66 | 15 692.45dDE | -11.19 | 9 |
| 7 | 新农玉4320 | 18.51 | 18.00 | 18.34 | 15 236.87eEF | -13.77 | 11 |
| 8 | XY395 | 18.89 | 18.02 | 18.43 | 15 372.99eEF | -13.00 | 10 |
| 9 | 登海1786 | 16.69 | 15.52 | 16.21 | 13 450.67fGH | -23.88 | 16 |
| 10 | Kws3376 | 18.27 | 17.65 | 18.11 | 15 009.08deEFG | -15.06 | 12 |
| 11 | 登海1905 | 16.05 | 16.31 | 16.28 | 13 511.79fGH | -23.53 | 15 |
| 12 | 新农002 | 17.39 | 16.93 | 17.15 | 14 297.94efEFG | -19.09 | 13 |
| 13 | 亿科9254 | 16.52 | 16.56 | 16.65 | 13 814.58fFGH | -21.82 | 14 |
| 14 | 亿科9254 | 18.61 | 19.95 | 19.13 | 16 025.80cdCDE | -9.31 | 8 |
| 15 | 华西704 | 24.68 | 22.55 | 22.77 | 19 445.42aA | 10.05 | 1 |
| 16 | 登海1707 | 23.50 | 23.53 | 22.26 | 19 248.18aA | 8.93 | 2 |
| 17 | 禾山903 | 22.02 | 20.72 | 19.22 | 17 211.97bcBCD | -2.59 | 7 |
| 18 | 华美1号 | 22.12 | 20.38 | 21.11 | 17 670.33bBC | 4 | |
表2 不同玉米品种产量性状比较
Tab.2 Comparison of the yield characters of different maize varieties
| 序号 Code | 品种名称 Variety name | 小区产量 Plot yield (kg) | 折合产量 Equivalent yield (kg/hm2) | 比CK增减 Increase compared with CK ± (%) | 产量位次 Yield rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||||
| 1 | 康地5184 | 16.68 | 15.63 | 15.92 | 13 397.89fGH | -24.18 | 17 |
| 2 | 新农001 | 21.55 | 20.19 | 20.44 | 17 273.09bcBCD | -2.25 | 5 |
| 3 | 亿科9158 | 15.72 | 13.69 | 14.33 | 12 150.61gH | -31.24 | 18 |
| 4 | 西亚3090 | 21.31 | 20.56 | 20.23 | 17 250.86bcBCD | -2.37 | 6 |
| 5 | 华西917 | 21.98 | 21.13 | 22.00 | 18 087.02bAB | 2.36 | 3 |
| 6 | 华西918 | 18.08 | 19.75 | 18.66 | 15 692.45dDE | -11.19 | 9 |
| 7 | 新农玉4320 | 18.51 | 18.00 | 18.34 | 15 236.87eEF | -13.77 | 11 |
| 8 | XY395 | 18.89 | 18.02 | 18.43 | 15 372.99eEF | -13.00 | 10 |
| 9 | 登海1786 | 16.69 | 15.52 | 16.21 | 13 450.67fGH | -23.88 | 16 |
| 10 | Kws3376 | 18.27 | 17.65 | 18.11 | 15 009.08deEFG | -15.06 | 12 |
| 11 | 登海1905 | 16.05 | 16.31 | 16.28 | 13 511.79fGH | -23.53 | 15 |
| 12 | 新农002 | 17.39 | 16.93 | 17.15 | 14 297.94efEFG | -19.09 | 13 |
| 13 | 亿科9254 | 16.52 | 16.56 | 16.65 | 13 814.58fFGH | -21.82 | 14 |
| 14 | 亿科9254 | 18.61 | 19.95 | 19.13 | 16 025.80cdCDE | -9.31 | 8 |
| 15 | 华西704 | 24.68 | 22.55 | 22.77 | 19 445.42aA | 10.05 | 1 |
| 16 | 登海1707 | 23.50 | 23.53 | 22.26 | 19 248.18aA | 8.93 | 2 |
| 17 | 禾山903 | 22.02 | 20.72 | 19.22 | 17 211.97bcBCD | -2.59 | 7 |
| 18 | 华美1号 | 22.12 | 20.38 | 21.11 | 17 670.33bBC | 4 | |
| 性状 Character | 株高 Variety name X1 | 穗位高 Plant height X2 | 穗长 Ear length X3 | 穗粗 Ear diameter X4 | 突尖 Bald tip length X5 | 行粒数 Number of rows X6 | 穗粒重 Grain weight per ear X7 | 百粒重 100 grain weight X8 | 脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture X9 | 小区产量 Plot yield Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 X1 Plant height | 0.858** | -0.064 | -0.043 | -0.056 | -0.034 | -0.063 | 0.084 | -0.158 | 0.077 | |
| 穗位高 X2 Ear height | 0.874** | -0.191 | -0.084 | 0.04 | -0.058 | -0.183 | -0.077 | -0.096 | -0.167 | |
| 穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.267 | 0.136 | 0.256 | -0.076 | 0.388 | 0.752** | 0.366 | 0.22 | 0.177 | |
| 穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.096 | 0.035 | 0.413 | -0.045 | 0.177 | 0.530* | 0.307 | 0.099 | 0.093 | |
| 突尖 X5 Bald length | -0.135 | -0.033 | -0.212 | -0.114 | 0.152 | 0.116 | 0.311 | 0.027 | 0.315 | |
| 行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.264 | 0.198 | 0.728** | 0.359 | -0.052 | 0.424 | -0.049 | -0.426 | 0.454 | |
| 穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.198 | 0.066 | 0.853** | 0.601** | -0.043 | 0.677** | 0.533* | 0.364 | 0.16 | |
| 百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.085 | -0.067 | 0.248 | 0.295 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 0.431 | 0.131 | 0.517* | |
| 脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.143 | -0.089 | 0.145 | 0.095 | 0.025 | -0.29 | 0.289 | 0.131 | -0.526* | |
| 小区产量 Y Plot yield | 0.216 | -0.021 | 0.398 | 0.21 | 0.203 | 0.565* | 0.352 | 0.485* | -0.484* |
表3 主要农艺性状与小区产量的相关性
Tab.3 Correlation analysis of main agronomic characters and plot yield
| 性状 Character | 株高 Variety name X1 | 穗位高 Plant height X2 | 穗长 Ear length X3 | 穗粗 Ear diameter X4 | 突尖 Bald tip length X5 | 行粒数 Number of rows X6 | 穗粒重 Grain weight per ear X7 | 百粒重 100 grain weight X8 | 脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture X9 | 小区产量 Plot yield Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 X1 Plant height | 0.858** | -0.064 | -0.043 | -0.056 | -0.034 | -0.063 | 0.084 | -0.158 | 0.077 | |
| 穗位高 X2 Ear height | 0.874** | -0.191 | -0.084 | 0.04 | -0.058 | -0.183 | -0.077 | -0.096 | -0.167 | |
| 穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.267 | 0.136 | 0.256 | -0.076 | 0.388 | 0.752** | 0.366 | 0.22 | 0.177 | |
| 穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.096 | 0.035 | 0.413 | -0.045 | 0.177 | 0.530* | 0.307 | 0.099 | 0.093 | |
| 突尖 X5 Bald length | -0.135 | -0.033 | -0.212 | -0.114 | 0.152 | 0.116 | 0.311 | 0.027 | 0.315 | |
| 行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.264 | 0.198 | 0.728** | 0.359 | -0.052 | 0.424 | -0.049 | -0.426 | 0.454 | |
| 穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.198 | 0.066 | 0.853** | 0.601** | -0.043 | 0.677** | 0.533* | 0.364 | 0.16 | |
| 百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.085 | -0.067 | 0.248 | 0.295 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 0.431 | 0.131 | 0.517* | |
| 脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.143 | -0.089 | 0.145 | 0.095 | 0.025 | -0.29 | 0.289 | 0.131 | -0.526* | |
| 小区产量 Y Plot yield | 0.216 | -0.021 | 0.398 | 0.21 | 0.203 | 0.565* | 0.352 | 0.485* | -0.484* |
| 项目 Item | 未标准化系数 Non-standardized coefficient | 标准误差 Standard error | 标准系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常量 Constant | -16.391 | 13.858 | -1.183 | 0.271 | |
| 株高 X1 Plant height | 9.663 | 4.996 | 0.626 | 1.934 | 0.089 |
| 穗位高 X2 Ear height | -14.69 | 6.717 | -0.685 | -2.187 | 0.06 |
| 穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.3 | 0.432 | 0.219 | 0.693 | 0.508 |
| 穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.736 | 1.503 | 0.089 | 0.489 | 0.638 |
| 突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.468 | 0.565 | 0.141 | 0.828 | 0.432 |
| 行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.469 | 0.197 | 0.898 | 2.376 | 0.045 |
| 穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | -0.055 | 0.032 | -0.823 | -1.734 | 0.121 |
| 百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.33 | 0.114 | 0.647 | 2.906 | 0.02 |
| 脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -7.384 | 21.294 | -0.085 | -0.347 | 0.738 |
表4 回归系数输出结果
Tab.4 The output results of regression coefficient
| 项目 Item | 未标准化系数 Non-standardized coefficient | 标准误差 Standard error | 标准系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常量 Constant | -16.391 | 13.858 | -1.183 | 0.271 | |
| 株高 X1 Plant height | 9.663 | 4.996 | 0.626 | 1.934 | 0.089 |
| 穗位高 X2 Ear height | -14.69 | 6.717 | -0.685 | -2.187 | 0.06 |
| 穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.3 | 0.432 | 0.219 | 0.693 | 0.508 |
| 穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.736 | 1.503 | 0.089 | 0.489 | 0.638 |
| 突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.468 | 0.565 | 0.141 | 0.828 | 0.432 |
| 行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.469 | 0.197 | 0.898 | 2.376 | 0.045 |
| 穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | -0.055 | 0.032 | -0.823 | -1.734 | 0.121 |
| 百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.33 | 0.114 | 0.647 | 2.906 | 0.02 |
| 脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -7.384 | 21.294 | -0.085 | -0.347 | 0.738 |
| 性状 Character | 简单 相关性 Simple CV | 直接通 径系数 Direct path coefficient | 间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | 合计 Total | |||
| 株高 X1 Plant height | 0.216 | 0.626 | - | -0.596 | 0.058 | 0.009 | -0.019 | 0.237 | -0.163 | 0.055 | 0.012 | -0.407 |
| 穗位高 X2 Ear height | -0.021 | -0.685 | 0.545 | - | 0.030 | 0.003 | -0.005 | 0.178 | -0.163 | -0.043 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| 穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.398 | 0.219 | 0.167 | -0.093 | - | 0.037 | -0.030 | 0.654 | -0.702 | 0.160 | -0.012 | 0.014 |
| 穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.21 | 0.089 | 0.060 | -0.024 | 0.090 | - | -0.016 | 0.322 | -0.495 | 0.191 | -0.008 | 0.061 |
| 突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.203 | 0.141 | -0.085 | 0.023 | -0.046 | -0.010 | - | -0.047 | 0.035 | 0.194 | -0.002 | 0.147 |
| 行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.565* | 0.898* | 0.165 | -0.136 | 0.159 | 0.032 | -0.007 | - | -0.557 | -0.013 | 0.025 | -0.497 |
| 穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.352 | -0.823 | 0.124 | -0.045 | 0.187 | 0.053 | -0.006 | 0.608 | - | 0.279 | -0.025 | 1.051 |
| 百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.485* | 0.647* | 0.053 | 0.046 | 0.054 | 0.026 | 0.042 | -0.018 | -0.355 | - | -0.011 | -0.215 |
| 脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.484* | -0.085 | -0.090 | 0.061 | 0.032 | 0.008 | 0.004 | -0.260 | -0.238 | 0.085 | - | -0.309 |
表5 产量与主要农艺性状间的通径系数
Tab.5 Path analysis between yield and main agronomic characters
| 性状 Character | 简单 相关性 Simple CV | 直接通 径系数 Direct path coefficient | 间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | 合计 Total | |||
| 株高 X1 Plant height | 0.216 | 0.626 | - | -0.596 | 0.058 | 0.009 | -0.019 | 0.237 | -0.163 | 0.055 | 0.012 | -0.407 |
| 穗位高 X2 Ear height | -0.021 | -0.685 | 0.545 | - | 0.030 | 0.003 | -0.005 | 0.178 | -0.163 | -0.043 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| 穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.398 | 0.219 | 0.167 | -0.093 | - | 0.037 | -0.030 | 0.654 | -0.702 | 0.160 | -0.012 | 0.014 |
| 穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.21 | 0.089 | 0.060 | -0.024 | 0.090 | - | -0.016 | 0.322 | -0.495 | 0.191 | -0.008 | 0.061 |
| 突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.203 | 0.141 | -0.085 | 0.023 | -0.046 | -0.010 | - | -0.047 | 0.035 | 0.194 | -0.002 | 0.147 |
| 行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.565* | 0.898* | 0.165 | -0.136 | 0.159 | 0.032 | -0.007 | - | -0.557 | -0.013 | 0.025 | -0.497 |
| 穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.352 | -0.823 | 0.124 | -0.045 | 0.187 | 0.053 | -0.006 | 0.608 | - | 0.279 | -0.025 | 1.051 |
| 百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.485* | 0.647* | 0.053 | 0.046 | 0.054 | 0.026 | 0.042 | -0.018 | -0.355 | - | -0.011 | -0.215 |
| 脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.484* | -0.085 | -0.090 | 0.061 | 0.032 | 0.008 | 0.004 | -0.260 | -0.238 | 0.085 | - | -0.309 |
| 性状 Trait | 主成分 Principal components | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 株高 Plant height | 0.477 | -0.762 | 0.342 | 0.137 |
| 穗位高 Ear height | 0.348 | -0.809 | 0.372 | 0.159 |
| 穗长 Ear length | 0.891 | 0.124 | -0.185 | 0.048 |
| 穗粗 Ear width | 0.643 | 0.273 | -0.034 | 0.046 |
| 突尖 Bared tip | -0.143 | 0.226 | 0.643 | -0.551 |
| 行粒数 Row gtains | 0.776 | -0.122 | -0.352 | -0.399 |
| 穗粒重 Grain weight per panicil | 0.916 | 0.324 | 0.011 | 0.04 |
| 百粒重 100-grain weight | 0.36 | 0.419 | 0.625 | -0.166 |
| 脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture | 0.081 | 0.467 | 0.298 | 0.744 |
| 特征值 Characteristic root | 3.154 | 1.889 | 1.307 | 1.093 |
| 贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 20.986 | 14.523 | 12.149 |
| 累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 56.029 | 70.552 | 82.701 |
表6 因子载荷矩阵及其贡献率
Tab.6 Rotated factor pattern, characteristic root and contribution rate
| 性状 Trait | 主成分 Principal components | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 株高 Plant height | 0.477 | -0.762 | 0.342 | 0.137 |
| 穗位高 Ear height | 0.348 | -0.809 | 0.372 | 0.159 |
| 穗长 Ear length | 0.891 | 0.124 | -0.185 | 0.048 |
| 穗粗 Ear width | 0.643 | 0.273 | -0.034 | 0.046 |
| 突尖 Bared tip | -0.143 | 0.226 | 0.643 | -0.551 |
| 行粒数 Row gtains | 0.776 | -0.122 | -0.352 | -0.399 |
| 穗粒重 Grain weight per panicil | 0.916 | 0.324 | 0.011 | 0.04 |
| 百粒重 100-grain weight | 0.36 | 0.419 | 0.625 | -0.166 |
| 脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture | 0.081 | 0.467 | 0.298 | 0.744 |
| 特征值 Characteristic root | 3.154 | 1.889 | 1.307 | 1.093 |
| 贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 20.986 | 14.523 | 12.149 |
| 累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 56.029 | 70.552 | 82.701 |
| [1] | 董继广, 姜军侠, 白伟, 等. 陕西杨凌国家区试玉米品种病虫害抗性调查[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(16):174-178, 137. |
| DONG Jiguang, JIANG Junxia, BAI Wei, et al. Investigation on pest resistance of Maize Varieties in Yangling National Regional Test[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2019, 47(16): 174-178, 137. | |
| [2] | 戴景瑞, 鄂立柱. 我国玉米育种科技创新问题的几点思考[J]. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(1):1-5. |
| DAI Jingrui, ER Lizhu. Reflections on the Technological Innovation of Maize breeding in China[J]. Journal of Maize Science, 2010, 18(1):1-5. | |
| [3] | 崔莹, 董雪, 葛立群. 中国玉米种业市场市场现状和发展研究[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2016,(2):75-78. |
| CUI Ying, DONG Xue, GE Liqun, et al. Study on the development and market status of maize in China[J]. Horticulture & Seed, 2016,(2):75-78. | |
| [4] | 杨金慧, 毛建昌, 李发民. 玉米杂交种农艺性状与子粒产量的相关和通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2003, 19(4):28-30. |
| YANG Jinhui, MAO Jianchang, LI Famin. Correlation and path analysis between agronomic traits and grain yield of maize hybrids[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2003, 19(4):28-30. | |
| [5] | 李军虎. 夏玉米杂交种主要农艺性状与产量的遗传相关和通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 1997,(3):16-19. |
| LI Junhu. Genetic correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits and yield in summer maize hybrids[J]. Journal of Maize Science, 1997,(3):16-19. | |
| [6] | 梁晓玲, 阿布来提, 冯国俊, 等. 玉米杂交种的产量比较及主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2001,(1):16-20. |
| LIANG Xiaoling, Abuleti, FENG Guojun, et al. Yield comparison and correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits of maize hybrids[J]. Journal of Maize Science, 2001,(1):16-20. | |
| [7] | 徐磊, 谭福忠, 师臣, 等. 黑龙江省西部干旱区玉米产量与产量构成因素的相关性分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020,(7):1-6. |
| XU Lei, TAN Fuzhong, SHI Chen, et al. Correlation analysis of corn yield and yield components in arid areas of western Heilongjiang Province[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(7):1-6. | |
| [8] | 张绍星, 肖春华, 邹楠, 等. 玉米品种高产稳产的综合评价研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(4):425-430. |
| ZHANG Shaoxing, XIAO Chunhua, ZOU Nan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of high and stable yield of maize varieties[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2017, 35(4):425-430. | |
| [9] | 阿依古丽·艾买提, 别力克孜·阿西木, 阿布来提, 等. 南疆地区春播玉米产量与主要农艺性状的相关研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2006, 43(6):490-492. |
| Ayiguli Aimaiti, Belizzi Asimu, Abulaiti, et al. Spring sowing corn yield and its correlation with main agronomic traits in southern Xinjiang region[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 43(6):490-492. | |
| [10] |
史宏. 不同生态类型大豆农艺性状与产量关系的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(1):150-159.
DOI |
| SHI Hong. Relationship between agronomic traits and yield of soybean of different ecological types[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinia, 2016, 33(1):150-159. | |
| [11] | 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6. |
| DU Jiaju, CHEN Zhiwei. Method of path analysis with SPSS linear regression[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2010, 45(2):4-6. | |
| [12] | 任洪雷, 李春霞, 龚士琛, 等. 利用SPSS实现玉米杂交种主要农艺性状与产量的相关和通径分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(3):86-90. |
| REN Honglei, LI Chunxia, GONG Shichen, et al. Correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits and yield of maize hybrids using SPSS[J]. Crops, 2019,(3):86-90. | |
| [13] | 沈恩庭, 房春兴, 唐怀坡. 适合玉米机收的含水量与产量关系的试验研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(24):31-33. |
| SHEN Enting, FANG Chunxing, TANG Huaipo. Experimental study on the relationship between water content and yield of maize[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 19(24):31-33. | |
| [14] |
鲁珊, 肖荷霞, 毛彩云, 等. 不同类型玉米主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19):11-14.
DOI |
| LU Shan, XIAO Hexia, MAO Caiyun, et al. Correlation and Path Analysis of Major Agronomic Traits of Maize Types[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(19):11-14. | |
| [15] | 李建中, 于广军, 许洛, 等. 抗逆丰产宜机收夏玉米品种筛选[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(22):21-23. |
| LI Jianzhong, YU Guangjun, XU Luo, et al. Selection of summer maize varieties with stress resistance and high yield suitable for machine harvesting[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(22): 21-23. | |
| [16] | 李少昆. 我国玉米机械粒收质量影响因素及粒收技术的发展方向[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(3):265-272. |
| LI Shaokun. Influencing factors of corn mechanical harvesting quality and development direction of corn mechanical harvesting technology in China[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural science Ed.), 2017, 35(3):265-272. | |
| [17] |
杨杰, 韩登旭, 王业建, 等. 新疆干旱区密植条件下不同玉米品种主要农艺性状及耐密性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9):1569-1577.
DOI |
|
YANG Jie, HAN Dengxu, WANG Yejian, et al. Study on Main Agronomic Traitsand Density Tonlerance of Different Maize Varieties under Dense Planting Conditions in Arid Areas of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9):1569-1577.
DOI |
|
| [18] | 吴伟华, 柳家友, 袁刘正, 等. 花期高温对不同玉米品种主要农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(6):33-36. |
| WU Weihua, LIU Jiayou, YUAN Liuzheng, et al. Effects of high temperature at flowering stage on Main Agronomic Characters and yield of Different Maize Varieties[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(6):33-36. | |
| [19] |
孟静娇, 陈百翠, 李琰聪, 等. 区域试验中玉米品种的高产稳产性综合分析与评判[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(21):11-18.
DOI |
|
MENG Jingjiao, CHEN Baicui, LI Yancong, et al. Comprehensive analysis and evaluation of high and stable yield of Maize Varieties in regional trials[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21):11-18.
DOI |
|
| [20] | 王浥州, 张万旭, 王克如, 等. 新疆玉米机械收获籽粒含水率与相关形状的关系[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(9):1417-1427. |
| WANG Suzhou, ZHANG Wanxu, WANG Keru, et al. The relationship between moisture content and related shape of maize mechanical harvest in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculture Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(9):1417-1427. |
| [1] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
| [2] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
| [3] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
| [4] | 曾婉盈, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤, 李思忠, 钱松廷, 高卫时, 张立明. 甜菜品系叶丛快速生长期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
| [5] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
| [6] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
| [7] | 陈勇, 周蕾, 隋春, 蔺彩霞. 32份板蓝根栽培种质在新疆产区的性状表现[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
| [8] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
| [9] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
| [10] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
| [11] | 袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
| [12] | 苗雨, 陈翠霞, 马艳明, 邢国芳, 董裕生, 陈智军, 王仙, 向莉. 276份中亚大麦种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895. |
| [13] | 牛婷婷, 马明生, 张军高. 秸秆还田和覆膜对旱作雨养农田土壤理化性质及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
| [14] | 赵敏华, 宋秉曦, 张宇鹏, 高志红, 朱勇勇, 陈晓远. 旱作条件下氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮肥偏生产力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
| [15] | 胡华兵, 孙琳琳, 刘建雄, 贺碧微, 刘珣, 郇町, 李有芳. 滴灌甜菜糖分积累与温度的相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1916-1925. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||