新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 43-51.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.006
• 作物遗传育种 · 耕作栽培 · 种质资源 · 生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
赵经华1(), 杨庭瑞1, 张恒2, 虎胆·吐马尔白1, 马亮1, 陈凯丽1
收稿日期:
2022-05-11
出版日期:
2023-01-20
发布日期:
2023-03-07
通信作者:
赵经华(1979-),男,新疆奇台人,教授,博士,研究方向为节水灌溉,(E-mail)105512275@qq.com基金资助:
ZHAO Jinghua1(), YANG Tingrui1, ZHANG Heng2, Hudan Tumaibai1, MA Liang1, CHEN Kaili1
Received:
2022-05-11
Published:
2023-01-20
Online:
2023-03-07
Correspondence author:
ZHAO Jinghua (1979-), Male, Qitai, Xinjiang, Dr.,professor, research field:research and teaching of water-saving irrigation technology,(E-mail)105512275@qq.comSupported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究多砾石砂土土质条件下不同水肥处理对滴灌春小麦生长发育的影响,为阿勒泰地区小麦的水肥施用提供指导。【方法】设置30 mm(W1)、45 mm(W2)、60 mm(W3)3个灌水水平及尿素施用0 kg/hm2(N0)、300 kg/hm2(N1)、600 kg/hm2(N2)3个施肥水平,利用方差分析及响应面法进行结果优选。【结果】同一灌水水平下,N0处理相比N1、N2处理春小麦株高及干物质积累量较低,其中 N0处理与N2处理株高和干物质积累量差异显著(P<0.05);同一施肥水平下春小麦株高及干物质积累量随着灌水量增加逐渐增加。灌水量对有效穗数有显著影响(P<0.05),对千粒重无显著影响(P>0.05)。施肥量对千粒重和有效穗数无显著影响(P>0.05)。灌水量与施肥量对每穗粒数和产量有极显著影响(P<0.01),水肥交互仅对产量有极显著影响(P<0.01)。【结论】利用响应面法优选后的最佳水肥条件为灌水60 mm,施肥388 kg/hm2,该条件下小麦产量为6 923.1 kg/hm2;W3N1处理(灌水量60 mm,施肥量300 kg/hm2)下小麦的干物质积累、产量构成及产量表现较好,最终产量为7 040.93 kg/hm2,选取W3N1为较好的水肥处理。
中图分类号:
赵经华, 杨庭瑞, 张恒, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 马亮, 陈凯丽. 基于响应面法的多砾石砂土滴灌春小麦水肥条件优选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 43-51.
ZHAO Jinghua, YANG Tingrui, ZHANG Heng, Hudan Tumaibai, MA Liang, CHEN Kaili. Optimal Selection of Water and Fertilizer for Spring Wheat under Drip Irrigation in Gravel Sandy Soil Based on Response Surface Methodology[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 43-51.
土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density (g/cm3) | 体积含水率 Volumetric moisture content(%) |
---|---|---|
20 | 1.79 | 22.13 |
40 | 1.77 | 20.86 |
60 | 1.75 | 17.22 |
平均Average | 1.77 | 20.07 |
表1 土壤容重和田间持水量
Table 1 Soil bulk density and field water holding capacity
土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density (g/cm3) | 体积含水率 Volumetric moisture content(%) |
---|---|---|
20 | 1.79 | 22.13 |
40 | 1.77 | 20.86 |
60 | 1.75 | 17.22 |
平均Average | 1.77 | 20.07 |
灌水日期 Irrigation date | 灌水周期 Water cycle (d) | 灌水 次数 Irrigation frequ ency | 灌水定额 Irrigation quota (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
4月22日 | / | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
5月17日 | 25 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
5月25日 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月03日 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月12日 | 9 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月20日 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月27日 | 7 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
7月04日 | 7 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
7月11日 | 7 | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
合计Total | 79 | 9 | 285 | 390 | 495 |
表2 春小麦灌溉制度
Table 2 Irrigation system of spring wheat
灌水日期 Irrigation date | 灌水周期 Water cycle (d) | 灌水 次数 Irrigation frequ ency | 灌水定额 Irrigation quota (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
4月22日 | / | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
5月17日 | 25 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
5月25日 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月03日 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月12日 | 9 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月20日 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
6月27日 | 7 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
7月04日 | 7 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 60 |
7月11日 | 7 | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
合计Total | 79 | 9 | 285 | 390 | 495 |
处理Treatments | N0 | N1(kg/hm2) | N2(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
底肥Base fertilizer | 不施肥 | 磷酸氢二铵195 钾镁肥105 | 磷酸氢二铵195 钾镁肥105 |
拔节期Jointing stage | 不施肥 | 尿素120 | 尿素240 |
抽穗扬花期Heading and flowering period | 不施肥 | 尿素120 | 尿素240 |
灌浆期Filling stage | 不施肥 | 尿素60 | 尿素120 |
尿素总计Total urea | / | 300 | 600 |
表3 春小麦各处理施肥
Table 3 Fertilization status of each treatment for spring wheat
处理Treatments | N0 | N1(kg/hm2) | N2(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
底肥Base fertilizer | 不施肥 | 磷酸氢二铵195 钾镁肥105 | 磷酸氢二铵195 钾镁肥105 |
拔节期Jointing stage | 不施肥 | 尿素120 | 尿素240 |
抽穗扬花期Heading and flowering period | 不施肥 | 尿素120 | 尿素240 |
灌浆期Filling stage | 不施肥 | 尿素60 | 尿素120 |
尿素总计Total urea | / | 300 | 600 |
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节孕穗期 Jointing and booting period | 抽穗扬花期 Heading and flowering period | 灌浆期 Filling stage | 成熟期 Mature stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 12.37a | 35.8ab | 56.2c | 59.6e | 59d |
W2N0 | 12.26a | 33.67b | 56.13c | 60.93e | 60.87cd |
W3N0 | 11.11a | 34.47b | 65.47ab | 69.27cd | 68bc |
W1N1 | 11.71a | 37.6ab | 58.87bc | 63.13de | 61.07cd |
W2N1 | 11.7a | 38.13ab | 65.07ab | 72.4abc | 70.93ab |
W3N1 | 11.9a | 37.67ab | 67.07ab | 79.53a | 79.2a |
W1N2 | 11.82a | 40.13a | 66.73ab | 71.33bc | 70.33b |
W2N2 | 12.79a | 40.07a | 67.4ab | 73.27abc | 71.87ab |
W3N2 | 12.93a | 40.87a | 69.2a | 78ab | 75.73ab |
表4 各水肥处理下不同生育期春小麦的株高变化
Table 4 Plant height of spring wheat at different growth stages under different water and fertilizer treatments(cm)
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节孕穗期 Jointing and booting period | 抽穗扬花期 Heading and flowering period | 灌浆期 Filling stage | 成熟期 Mature stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 12.37a | 35.8ab | 56.2c | 59.6e | 59d |
W2N0 | 12.26a | 33.67b | 56.13c | 60.93e | 60.87cd |
W3N0 | 11.11a | 34.47b | 65.47ab | 69.27cd | 68bc |
W1N1 | 11.71a | 37.6ab | 58.87bc | 63.13de | 61.07cd |
W2N1 | 11.7a | 38.13ab | 65.07ab | 72.4abc | 70.93ab |
W3N1 | 11.9a | 37.67ab | 67.07ab | 79.53a | 79.2a |
W1N2 | 11.82a | 40.13a | 66.73ab | 71.33bc | 70.33b |
W2N2 | 12.79a | 40.07a | 67.4ab | 73.27abc | 71.87ab |
W3N2 | 12.93a | 40.87a | 69.2a | 78ab | 75.73ab |
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节孕穗期 Jointing and booting period | 抽穗扬花期 Heading and flowering period | 灌浆期 Filling stage | 成熟期 Mature stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 7 910.62a | 8 731.03b | 12 326.16a | 13 646.82b | 13 433.63d |
W2N0 | 7 977.32a | 9 384.69ab | 12 739.70a | 14 473.90b | 15 213.82bcd |
W3N0 | 7 843.92a | 8 991.16ab | 12 532.93a | 15 587.79ab | 15 755.39abcd |
W1N1 | 8 390.86a | 10 358.51a | 13 500.08a | 14 027.01b | 14 940.55cd |
W2N1 | 8 164.08a | 10 305.15ab | 13 966.98a | 15 654.49ab | 16 141.15abc |
W3N1 | 8 084.04a | 10 171.75ab | 14 653.99a | 17 455.39a | 17 275.15abc |
W1N2 | 8 070.70a | 10 388.68a | 14 527.26a | 16 262.51ab | 16 234.78abc |
W2N2 | 8 384.19a | 9 731.53ab | 15 227.01a | 18 001.58a | 17 714.92ab |
W3N2 | 8 090.71a | 9 458.06ab | 14 914.12a | 18 115.72a | 18 189.09a |
表5 各水肥处理下不同生育期春小麦的干物质积累变化
Table 5 Dry matter accumulation of spring wheat at different growth stages under different water and fertilizer treatments(kg/hm2)
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节孕穗期 Jointing and booting period | 抽穗扬花期 Heading and flowering period | 灌浆期 Filling stage | 成熟期 Mature stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 7 910.62a | 8 731.03b | 12 326.16a | 13 646.82b | 13 433.63d |
W2N0 | 7 977.32a | 9 384.69ab | 12 739.70a | 14 473.90b | 15 213.82bcd |
W3N0 | 7 843.92a | 8 991.16ab | 12 532.93a | 15 587.79ab | 15 755.39abcd |
W1N1 | 8 390.86a | 10 358.51a | 13 500.08a | 14 027.01b | 14 940.55cd |
W2N1 | 8 164.08a | 10 305.15ab | 13 966.98a | 15 654.49ab | 16 141.15abc |
W3N1 | 8 084.04a | 10 171.75ab | 14 653.99a | 17 455.39a | 17 275.15abc |
W1N2 | 8 070.70a | 10 388.68a | 14 527.26a | 16 262.51ab | 16 234.78abc |
W2N2 | 8 384.19a | 9 731.53ab | 15 227.01a | 18 001.58a | 17 714.92ab |
W3N2 | 8 090.71a | 9 458.06ab | 14 914.12a | 18 115.72a | 18 189.09a |
处理 Treatments | 千粒重 Thousand Grain Weight(g) | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per spike (个) | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number (株/hm2) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 38.5b | 27.32d | 3 741 870b | 3 935.42f | |
W2N0 | 41.97ab | 28.77d | 3 875 270ab | 4 375.46e | |
W3N0 | 42.63ab | 29.22cd | 4 272 135a | 5 073.57d | |
W1N1 | 43ab | 30.17cd | 3 815 240ab | 4 846.91d | |
W2N1 | 43.23ab | 34.9ab | 4 018 675ab | 6 301.77b | |
W3N1 | 45.5a | 36.99a | 4 088 710ab | 7 040.93a | |
W1N2 | 40.33ab | 32.64bc | 3 701 850b | 4 178.24ef | |
W2N2 | 42.5ab | 35.19ab | 3 855 260ab | 5 926.93c | |
W3N2 | 41.03ab | 36.97a | 4 028 680ab | 6 097.76bc | |
灌水 | NS | ** | * | ** | |
多元方差分析 MANOVA | 施肥 | NS | ** | NS | ** |
灌水×施肥 | NS | NS | NS | ** |
表6 不同水肥水平对小麦的产量及产量构成方差变化
Table 6 Variance analysis of different water and fertilizer levels on wheat yield and yield composition
处理 Treatments | 千粒重 Thousand Grain Weight(g) | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per spike (个) | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number (株/hm2) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 38.5b | 27.32d | 3 741 870b | 3 935.42f | |
W2N0 | 41.97ab | 28.77d | 3 875 270ab | 4 375.46e | |
W3N0 | 42.63ab | 29.22cd | 4 272 135a | 5 073.57d | |
W1N1 | 43ab | 30.17cd | 3 815 240ab | 4 846.91d | |
W2N1 | 43.23ab | 34.9ab | 4 018 675ab | 6 301.77b | |
W3N1 | 45.5a | 36.99a | 4 088 710ab | 7 040.93a | |
W1N2 | 40.33ab | 32.64bc | 3 701 850b | 4 178.24ef | |
W2N2 | 42.5ab | 35.19ab | 3 855 260ab | 5 926.93c | |
W3N2 | 41.03ab | 36.97a | 4 028 680ab | 6 097.76bc | |
灌水 | NS | ** | * | ** | |
多元方差分析 MANOVA | 施肥 | NS | ** | NS | ** |
灌水×施肥 | NS | NS | NS | ** |
处理 Treat ments | 灌水定额 Irrigation quota (mm) | 尿素总计 Total urea (kg/hm2) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 45 | 600 | 5 926.93 |
W2N0 | 30 | 300 | 4 846.9 |
W3N0 | 30 | 0 | 3 935.42 |
W1N1 | 60 | 0 | 5 073.57 |
W2N1 | 30 | 600 | 4 178.24 |
W3N1 | 45 | 0 | 4 375.46 |
W1N2 | 60 | 600 | 6 097.76 |
W2N2 | 60 | 300 | 7 040.93 |
W3N2 | 45 | 300 | 6 301.77 |
表7 模型参数的设计及运行数据
Table 7 Design and operation data of model parameters
处理 Treat ments | 灌水定额 Irrigation quota (mm) | 尿素总计 Total urea (kg/hm2) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
W1N0 | 45 | 600 | 5 926.93 |
W2N0 | 30 | 300 | 4 846.9 |
W3N0 | 30 | 0 | 3 935.42 |
W1N1 | 60 | 0 | 5 073.57 |
W2N1 | 30 | 600 | 4 178.24 |
W3N1 | 45 | 0 | 4 375.46 |
W1N2 | 60 | 600 | 6 097.76 |
W2N2 | 60 | 300 | 7 040.93 |
W3N2 | 45 | 300 | 6 301.77 |
来源 Origin | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P | R2/调整R2 R2/Adjust R2 | 显著性 Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield | 产量 Yield | ||||||
模型Model | 8.866E+006 | 5 | 1.773E+006 | 12.41 | 0.032 2 | 0.954/0.877 | 显著 |
X1 | 4.597E+006 | 1 | 4.597E+006 | 32.17 | 0.010 9 | ||
X2 | 1.324E+006 | 1 | 1.324E+006 | 9.26 | 0.055 7 | ||
X1X2 | 1.526E+005 | 1 | 1.526E+005 | 1.07 | 0.377 4 | ||
2.302E+005 | 1 | 2.302E+005 | 1.61 | 0.293 9 | |||
2.563E+006 | 1 | 2.563E+006 | 17.93 | 0.024 1 | |||
误差Error | 4.287E+005 | 3 | 1.429E+005 |
表8 产量响应值回归方程方差
Table 8 Variance analysis of regression equation for yield response value
来源 Origin | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P | R2/调整R2 R2/Adjust R2 | 显著性 Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield | 产量 Yield | ||||||
模型Model | 8.866E+006 | 5 | 1.773E+006 | 12.41 | 0.032 2 | 0.954/0.877 | 显著 |
X1 | 4.597E+006 | 1 | 4.597E+006 | 32.17 | 0.010 9 | ||
X2 | 1.324E+006 | 1 | 1.324E+006 | 9.26 | 0.055 7 | ||
X1X2 | 1.526E+005 | 1 | 1.526E+005 | 1.07 | 0.377 4 | ||
2.302E+005 | 1 | 2.302E+005 | 1.61 | 0.293 9 | |||
2.563E+006 | 1 | 2.563E+006 | 17.93 | 0.024 1 | |||
误差Error | 4.287E+005 | 3 | 1.429E+005 |
[1] |
张金波, 严勇亮, 王小波, 等. 新疆春小麦育成品种遗传演变分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(3): 418-426.
DOI |
ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang, WANG Xiaobo, et al. Analysis of the genetic evolution of cultivated spring wheat varieties in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(3): 418-426.
DOI |
|
[2] | 陈凯丽, 赵经华, 马英杰, 等. 不同水氮处理对阿勒泰地区滴灌春小麦生长、产量及水氮利用的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2017, 40(2): 85-91. |
CHEN Kaili, ZHAO Jinghua, MA Yingjie, et al. Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on the growth, yield,water and nitrogen utilization of spring wheat under drip irrigation in Altay area[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017, 40(2): 85-91. | |
[3] | 陈凯丽, 赵经华, 黄红建, 等. 不同滴灌灌水定额对小麦的耗水特性和产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(3): 65-68. |
CHEN Kaili, ZHAO Jinghua, HUANG Hongjian, et al. Effect of different irrigation quota on water consumption characteristics and yield of wheat[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 36(3): 65-68. | |
[4] | 杨荣赞, 王龙, 余航, 等. 小麦生育期内田间土壤水分动态变化过程及其模型模拟[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(4): 717-725. |
YANG Rongzan, WANG Long, YU Hang, et al. The dynamic process and model simulation of soil moisture in wheat growth period[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2020, 35(4): 717-725. | |
[5] | 王冀川, 徐雅丽, 高山, 等. 滴灌小麦根系生理特性及其空间分布[J]. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(5): 65-70. |
WANG Jichuan, XU Yali, GAO Shan, et al. The physiological characteristics and root spatial distribution of spring wheat in drip irrigation field[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 65-70. | |
[6] | 蒋桂英, 刘建国, 魏建军, 等. 灌溉频率对滴灌小麦土壤水分分布及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(4): 38-42. |
JIANG Guiying, LIU Jianguo, WEI Jianjun, et al. Effects of irrigation frequency on soil water distribution and water use efficiency in wheat field under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(4): 38-42. | |
[7] | 张松超, 张建芳, 王冀川, 等. 不同种植方式和施氮量对滴灌冬小麦生理特征及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(4): 1-10. |
ZHANG Songchao, ZHANG Jianfang, WANG Jichuan, et al. Effects of different planting patterns and nitrogen applicationson physiological characteristics and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 1-10. | |
[8] | 张旭, 李莎, 蔡煜, 等. 干旱区不同水氮梯度滴灌冬小麦干物质积累动态特征及产量效应[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(9): 2018-2026. |
ZHANG Xu, LI Sha, CAI Yu, et al. Analysis on DMA dynamic characteristics and yield of winter wheat with different water and nitrogen gradients under drip irrigation in arid area[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(9): 2018-2026. | |
[9] | 黄兴法, 刘晓晖, 张晓航, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区水肥制度对滴灌春小麦生长及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(S2): 9-12. |
HUANG Xingfa, LIU Xiaohui, ZHANG Xiaohang, et al. Effect of water-fertilizer scheduling on yield of spring wheat under drip irrigation in yellow river irrigation region of Ningxia hui autonomous region[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(S2): 9-12. | |
[10] | 陈凯丽, 赵经华, 付秋萍, 等. 不同水氮处理对滴灌冬小麦生长、产量和耗水特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(4): 125-132. |
CHEN Kaili, ZHAO Jinghua, FU Qiuping, et al. The effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on the growth,yield and water consumption characteristics of winter wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(4): 125-132. | |
[11] |
高翠民, 杨永辉, 何方, 等. 不同灌溉技术下水氮耦合对小麦光合特性、灌水利用特性及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(5): 72-80.
DOI |
GAO Cuimin, YANG Yonghui, HE Fang, et al. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on photosynthetic characteristics,irrigation water use characteristics and yield in winter wheatunder different irrigation technologies[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(5): 72-80. | |
[12] | SL 13-2015-2015.灌溉试验规范[S]. |
SL 13-2015-2015.Specification for Irrigation Experiment[S]. | |
[13] | 闫永銮, 郝卫平, 梅旭荣, 等. 拔节期水分胁迫-复水对冬小麦干物质积累和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32(2): 190-195. |
YAN Yongluan, HAO Weiping, MEI Xurong, et al. Effects of waterstress-rewatering at jointing stage on dry matter accumulation and WUE of winter wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2011, 32(2): 190-195. | |
[14] | Vembu V, Ganesan G. Heat treatment optimization for tensile properties of 8011 Al/15% SiCp metal matrix composite using response surface methodology[J]. Defence Technology, 2015, 4(11): 390-395. |
[15] | 严勇亮, 丛花, 张金波, 等. 水氮调控对两种穗型冬小麦品种农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(8): 1388-1393. |
YAN Yongliang, CONG Hua, ZHANG Jinbo, et al. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen on agronomic traits and yield in winter wheat with two spike-types[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(8): 1388-1393. | |
[16] | 王玲玲, 吴文革, 李瑞, 等. 施氮量对弱筋小麦籽粒品质与氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 35(5): 1-8. |
WANG Lingling, WU Wenge, LI Rui, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate on grain quality and nitrogen utilization of weak gluten wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 35(5): 1-8. | |
[17] | 丛鑫, 张立志, 徐征和, 等. 水氮互作对冬小麦水肥利用效率与经济效益的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(3): 315-324. |
CONG Xin, ZHANG Lizhi, XU Zhenghe, et al. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen interaction on water and fertilizer use efficiency and economic benefits of winter wheat[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(3): 315-324. | |
[18] | 王俊, 申立中, 杨永忠, 等. 基于响应曲面法的非道路用高压共轨柴油机设计点优化标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(3): 31-39. |
WANG Jun, SHEN Lizhong, YANG Yongzhong, et al. Optimizing calibration of design points for non-road high pressure common rail diesel engine base on response surface methodology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(3): 31-39. | |
[19] | 王子凌, 信欣, 刘琴, 等. 响应面法优化CANON工艺处理猪场沼液脱氮性能研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(10): 2326-2334. |
WANG Ziling, XIN Xin, LIU Qin, et al. Optimization of denitrification performance of CANON process for treating anaerobic digester liquor of swine wastewater by response surface methodology[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(10): 2326-2334. |
[1] | 王春生, 李剑峰, 张跃强, 樊哲儒, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 夏建强, 王芳平, 赵奇. 新疆主栽春小麦品种花药培养力基因型差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086. |
[2] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[3] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[4] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[5] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
[6] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[7] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[8] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
[9] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[10] | 袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[11] | 袁以琳, 颜安, 左筱筱, 侯正清, 张振飞, 肖淑婷, 孙哲, 马梦倩, 赵宇航. 氮肥减量配施生物有机肥对春小麦增产及土壤培肥的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
[12] | 刘旭欢, 于姗, 刘跃, 石书兵. 不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887. |
[13] | 牛婷婷, 马明生, 张军高. 秸秆还田和覆膜对旱作雨养农田土壤理化性质及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
[14] | 赵敏华, 宋秉曦, 张宇鹏, 高志红, 朱勇勇, 陈晓远. 旱作条件下氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮肥偏生产力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
[15] | 李锁丞, 柳延涛, 董红业, 孙振博, 李紫薇, 张春媛, 王开勇, 李强, 杨明凤. 不同施钾量对滴灌花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1926-1936. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 44
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||