海岛棉重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.001

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 2861-2869.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.001

• 作物遗传育种·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇下一篇

海岛棉重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性评价

杨龙(), 赵福相, 段雅洁, 蔡永生, 郑凯, 陈琴, 陈全家, 曲延英()

新疆农业大学农学院/棉花教育部工程研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2022-01-22 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-30
通信作者: 曲延英(1962-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为棉花遗传育种,(E-mail)xjyyq5322@126.com
作者简介:杨龙(1994-),男,湖南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花抗旱育种,(E-mail)18373009232@163.com
基金资助:
自治区重大科技专项(2020A01001-2);自治区高校科研计划自然科学青年项目(XJEDU2021Y020);新疆维吾尔自治区天山雪松计划(2018XS05)

Evaluation on Drought Resistance of Recombinant Inbred Lines of Gossypium barbadense L. at Flowering and Boll Stages

YANG Long(), ZHAO Fuxiang, DUAN Yajie, CAI Yongsheng, ZHENG Kai, CHEN Qin, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying()

Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education,Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2022-01-22 Published:2022-12-20 Online:2023-01-30
Correspondence author: QU Yanying(1962-), Female, Urumqi, professor, doctor, doctoral supervisor, research direction: cotton genetics and breeding, (E-mail) xjyyq5322@126.com
Supported by:
Major Science and technology projects of the Autonomous Region(project number: 2020A01001-2);Natural Science Youth Project of the Autonomous Region’s University Research Program(project number: XJEDU2021Y020);Sponsored by the Xinjiang Cedar Project, Ten-zan(2018 XS05)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 构建海岛棉分离群体,筛选抗、敏极端材料,为棉花抗旱种质改良和优质抗逆品种选育提供原材料,为棉花抗旱性研究提供基础。【方法】 以双亲及海海重组自交系群体71个株系为材料,在花铃期进行田间自然干旱胁迫,通过测定形态指标和产量相关指标,采用方差分析、主成分分析、聚类分析等相结合的方法,对双亲及RILs家系进行抗旱性鉴定及评价。【结果】 7个性状被分为植株形态及单株产量相关性状和纤维产量相关性状2个综合因子;RILs材料划分为较敏旱型(28份)、抗旱型(26份)、敏旱型(14份)和强抗旱型(3份)共4个类群。得到多元线性模型:D值=-0.771+0.089×DC_株高+0.117×DC_{有效果枝数}+0.132×DC_铃数+0.343×DC_有效铃数+0.338×DC_{单铃皮棉重}+0.230×DC_{单株籽棉产量}。【结论】 筛选出强抗旱材料HH-16、HH-61、HH-70和敏旱材料HH-051、HH-05,可以应用于抗旱相关基因表达分析及抗逆种质创新研究。有效铃数、单铃皮棉重和单株籽棉产量可以作为棉花自交系田间抗旱性鉴定的主要指标。

关键词: 海岛棉; 重组自交系; 花铃期; 抗旱性评价; 回归分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 To provide raw materials for the improvement of drought-resistant cotton germplasm and breeding of high-quality stress-resistant varieties by constructing isolated populations of Gossypium barbadense L. and screening resistant and sensitive extreme materials,which provides a basis for future research on cotton drought resistance.【Methods】 71 strains of parents and Haihai recombinant inbred line populations were takne as experimental materials, the field was subjected to natural drought stress at the flowering and boll stage, and morphological indicators and yield-related indicators were measured. Meanwhile, variance analysis, principal component analysis, and clustering analysis were employed simultaneously to identify and evaluate the drought resistance of parents and RILs families.【Results】 Principal component analysis of 7 traits could be divided into two comprehensive factors: plant morphology, yield-related traits per plant, and fiber yield-related traits; based on the comprehensive drought resistance measure (D value) for systematic clustering, the RILs materials were divided into four groups: more drought-sensitive type (28), drought-resistant type (26), drought-sensitive type (14) and strong drought-resistant type (3). When the drought resistance coefficient of each trait was used as the independent variable and the D value as the dependent variable for regression analysis, a multivariate linear model was obtained: D value= -0.771+0.089×DC Plant height + 0.117× DC number of effective branches+0.132×DC number of bells+0.343×DC effective number of bells +0.338×DC single boll lint weight+0.230× DC Cotton yield per plant.【Conclusion】 The strong drought-resistant materials HH-16, HH-61, HH-70 and the drought-sensitive materials HH-051 and HH-05 are screened out, which can be applied to the analysis of drought-related gene expression and the innovation of stress-resistant germplasm. The results of principal component analysis and multiple regression analysis show that the effective boll number, lint weight per boll and cotton yield per plant can be used as the main indicators for the identification of drought resistance of cotton inbred lines in the field.

Key words: Gossypium barbadense L.; recombinant inbred line; flowering and boll stage; drought resistance evaluation; regression analysis

中图分类号:

S562

杨龙, 赵福相, 段雅洁, 蔡永生, 郑凯, 陈琴, 陈全家, 曲延英. 海岛棉重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2861-2869.

YANG Long, ZHAO Fuxiang, DUAN Yajie, CAI Yongsheng, ZHENG Kai, CHEN Qin, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation on Drought Resistance of Recombinant Inbred Lines of Gossypium barbadense L. at Flowering and Boll Stages[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2861-2869.

图/表 7

参考文献 28

[1]	毛树春, 李亚兵, 冯璐, 等. 新疆棉花生产发展问题研究[J]. 农业展望, 2014,(11): 43-51.
	MAO Shuchun, LI Yabing, FENG Lu, et al. Research on the development of cotton production in Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 2014,(11): 43-51.
[2]	程林梅, 张原根, 阎继耀, 等. 土壤干旱对棉花生理特性与产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 1995,(4): 233-237.
	CHENG Linmei, ZHANG Yuangen, YAN Jiyao, et al. The effect of soil drought on cotton physiological characteristics and yield[J]. Cotton Science, 1995,(4): 233-237.
[3]	杨长琴, 刘瑞显, 张国伟, 等. 花铃期干旱对棉纤维素累积及纤维比强度的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015, 31(6): 1218-1223.
	YANG Changqin, LIU Ruixian, ZHANG Guowei, et al. The effect of drought during flowering and boll stage on cotton cellulose accumulation and fiber specific strength[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 31(6): 1218-1223.
[4]	季术. 花铃期土壤持续干旱对棉纤维品质和棉纤维发育相关酶活性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2016.
	JI Shu. The effect of continuous soil drought at the flowering and boll stage on cotton fiber quality and cotton fiber development-related enzyme activities[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016.
[5]	郭香墨. 我国专用棉育种现状与发展[J]. 棉花学报, 1995, (2): 65-69.
	GUO Xiangmo. Status and development of special cotton breeding in my country[J]. Cotton Science, 1995,(2): 65-69.
[6]	Niu J Z, Ma S D, Chen H J, et al. The compensation effects of physiology and yield in cotton after drought stress[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2018: 224-225.
[7]	袁钧, 郝秀忍. 棉花耐旱生态指标研究初报[J]. 中国棉花, 1991, (2): 9-10.
	YUAN Jun, HAO Xiuren, et al. A preliminary report on cotton drought tolerance ecological indicators[J]. China Cotton, 1991,(2): 9-10.
[8]	李少昆, 肖璐, 黄文华, 等. 不同时期干旱胁迫对棉花生长和产量的影响Ⅱ棉花生长发育及生理特性的变化[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 3(4): 261-264.
	LI Shaokun, XIAO Lu, HUANG Wenhua, et al. Effects of drought stress on cotton growth and yield in different periods II Changes in cotton growth and physiological characteristics[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 1999, 3(4): 261-264.
[9]	Abid U, Sun H, Yang X Y, et al. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(3): 15-17. DOI URL
[10]	Reza H, Ahmad M, Mohammad N, et al. Survey of the Effect of Different Irrigation Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Sensitive and Tolerant Cotton Cultivars[J]. Majallah-iābvaKhāk, 2017, 30(5): 7-9.
[11]	俞希根, 孙景生. 棉花适宜土壤水分下限和干旱指标研究[J]. 棉花学报, 1999, (1): 35-38.
	YU Xigen, SUN Jingsheng. Study on the lower limit of suitable soil moisture and drought index for cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 1999,(1): 35-38.
[12]	赵福相, 曲延英, 陈全家, 等. 海岛棉种质资源抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7): 1187-1195. DOI
	ZHAO Fuxiang, QU Yanying, CHEN Quanjia, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of island cotton germplasm resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(7): 1187-1195. DOI
[13]	李海明, 刘绍东, 张思平. 陆地棉种质资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(3): 583-597.
	LI Haiming, LIU Shaodong, ZHANG Siping. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance index screening of upland cotton germplasm resources during flowering and boll stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(3): 583-597.
[14]	李志博, 徐建伟, 李衡. 后期持续干旱对北疆棉花生长发育的影响及其抗旱适应性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3): 45-49, 82.
	LI Zhibo, XU Jianwei, LI Heng. The effect of sustained drought in the later period on the growth and development of cotton in northern Xinjiang and its drought resistance adaptability evaluation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3): 45-49, 82.
[15]	李忠旺, 陈玉梁, 罗俊杰. 棉花抗旱品种筛选鉴定及抗旱性综合评价方法[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(1): 240-247.
	LI Zhongwang, CHEN Yuliang, LUO Junjie. Drought-resistant cotton varieties screening and identification and comprehensive evaluation method for drought resistance[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2017, 35(1): 240-247.
[16]	高宝云, 张军. 9个冬小麦品种对苗期干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45(3): 340-345.
	GAO Baoyun, ZHANG Jun. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of 9 winter wheat varieties to drought at seedling stage[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(3): 340-345.
[17]	张海燕, 解备涛, 汪宝卿, 等. 不同甘薯品种抗旱性评价及耐旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 419-430. DOI
	ZHANG Haiyan, XIE Beitao, WANG Baoqing, et al. Drought resistance evaluation and drought resistance index screening of different sweet potato varieties[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(3): 419-430. DOI
[18]	王兴荣, 张彦军, 李玥, 等. 干旱胁迫对大豆生长的影响及抗旱性评价方法与指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(1): 49-56.
	WANG Xingrong, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Yue, et al. Effects of drought stress on soybean growth and drought resistance evaluation methods and index screening[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19(1): 49-56.
[19]	陈善福, 舒庆尧. 植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 16(5): 555-560.
	CHEN Shanfu, SHU Qingyao. The biological mechanism of plant drought stress tolerance and its genetic engineering research progress[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(5): 555-560.
[20]	李安西. 棉花丰产栽培技术[J]. 江西棉花, 2005, 27(3): 49.
	LI Anxi. High-yield cotton cultivation techniques[J]. Jiangxi Cotton, 2005, 27(3): 49.
[21]	俞希根, 孙景生. 棉花适宜土壤水分下限和干旱指标研究[J]. 棉花学报, 1999,(1): 35-38.
	YU Xigen, SUN Jingsheng. Study on the lower limit of suitable soil moisture and drought index for cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 1999,(1): 35-38.
[22]	庄振刚, 叶春秀, 李有忠. 新疆陆地棉早熟品种花铃期抗旱性初步评价[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(7): 5-7.
	ZHUANG Zhengang, YE Chunxiu, LI Youzhong. Preliminary evaluation on drought resistance of Xinjiang upland cotton early-maturing varieties during flowering and boll stage[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(7): 5-7.
[23]	张换样, 吴慎杰, 竹梦婕, 等. 全生育期干旱胁迫下棉花主要农艺性状变化研究[J]. 现代农村科技, 2020,(1): 69-70.
	ZHANG Huanyang, WU Shenjie, ZHU Mengjie, et al. Changes in cotton main agronomic characteristics under drought stress during the whole growth period[J]. Modern Rural Science and Technology, 2020,(1): 69-70.
[24]	郑巨云, 梁亚军, 李雪源, 等. 棉花品种资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(2): 150-163.
	ZHENG Juyun, LIANG Yajun, LI Xueyuan, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance of cotton variety resources during flowering and boll stage[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2021, 39(2): 150-163.
[25]	姜梦辉, 孙丰磊, 陈全家. 棉花陆海重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(6): 1635-1643.
	JIANG Menghui, SUN Fenglei, CHEN Quanjia, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance of cotton land-sea recombined inbred line population during flowering and boll stage[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(6): 1635-1643.
[26]	王飞名. 栽培稻抗旱性的性状鉴定与水分适应度研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2008.
	WANG Feiming. Study on the identification of drought resistance and water adaptability of cultivated rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008.
[27]	金黎明, 李力, 荣义华, 等. 转Bt基因抗虫杂交棉产量与重要性状的多元线性回归分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(17): 8894-8896, 8899.
	JIN Liming, LI Li, Rong Yihua, et al. Multiple linear regression analysis of yield and important traits of transgenic Bt hybrid cotton[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(17): 8894-8896, 8899.
[28]	吴晓东, 孙骥, 王子胜, 等. 特早熟杂交棉杂种优势比较及产量构成因素回归分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(5): 19-22.
	WU Xiaodong, SUN Ji, WANG Zisheng, et al. Comparison of heterosis of extra-early maturity hybrid cotton and regression analysis of yield components[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(5): 19-22.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

225

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	86	0	0	139

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	203	22
比例	90%	10%

摘要

482

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	482

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	349	133
比例	72%	28%

性状 Traits	处理 Deal	基因型 Genotype	环境 Environment	基因与环境互作 GE_interaction	遗传力 Heritability
株高Plant height	74.35^**	7.91^**	45.58^**	1.18	0.85
有效果枝数Number of effective branches	21.17^**	2.64^**	176.83^**	1.06	0.61
铃数Number of bells	3.99^*	1.71^**	19.43^**	0.89	0.42
有效铃数Effective number of bells	19.43^**	1.77^**	183.91^**	1.00	0.43
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight	5.76^**	1.61^**	14.95^**	0.62	0.38
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton	47.21^**	1.48^**	248.25^**	0.87	0.33
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant	25.49^**	1.84^**	204.68^**	0.96	0.46

性状 Traits	处理 Deal	基因型 Genotype	环境 Environment	基因与环境互作 GE_interaction	遗传力 Heritability
株高Plant height	74.35^**	7.91^**	45.58^**	1.18	0.85
有效果枝数Number of effective branches	21.17^**	2.64^**	176.83^**	1.06	0.61
铃数Number of bells	3.99^*	1.71^**	19.43^**	0.89	0.42
有效铃数Effective number of bells	19.43^**	1.77^**	183.91^**	1.00	0.43
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight	5.76^**	1.61^**	14.95^**	0.62	0.38
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton	47.21^**	1.48^**	248.25^**	0.87	0.33
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant	25.49^**	1.84^**	204.68^**	0.96	0.46

性状 Traits	处理 Deal	亲本Parents		RILs(n=71)Recombinant inbred Lines
性状 Traits	处理 Deal	PimaS-7	5917	均值 Mean value	标准差 Standard deviation	极小值 Min-value	极大值 Maximum	峰度 Kurtosis	偏度 Degree of deviation	变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%)	T检验 T test
株高 Plant height	W	74.15	96.49	74.42	8.79	55.75	101.18	55.75	101.18	11.81	<0.001
株高 Plant height	D	61.79	80.67	68.01	7.11	50.10	83.80	50.10	83.80	10.45	<0.001
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches	W	5.71	7.41	5.30	0.73	3.93	7.88	3.93	7.88	13.68	<0.001
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches	D	6.47	6.51	4.91	0.70	3.44	6.74	3.44	6.74	14.21	<0.001
铃数 Number of bells	W	9.69	10.55	7.05	0.93	5.13	9.82	5.13	9.82	13.20	<0.037
铃数 Number of bells	D	9.58	8.24	7.43	1.16	4.76	10.19	4.76	10.19	15.59	<0.037
有效铃数 Effective number of bells	W	7.70	9.03	6.14	0.91	4.31	9.24	4.31	9.24	14.79	0.007
有效铃数 Effective number of bells	D	8.25	6.99	5.75	0.85	4.04	7.45	4.04	7.45	14.78	0.007
单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight	W	1.21	1.26	1.24	0.12	1.00	1.59	1.00	1.59	9.49	0.008
单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight	D	1.28	1.31	1.19	0.13	0.83	1.45	0.83	1.45	10.96	0.008
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton	W	24.07	35.32	21.28	3.22	15.48	30.85	15.48	30.85	15.15	<0.001
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton	D	26.94	26.33	18.95	3.20	11.73	24.98	11.73	24.98	16.91	<0.001
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant	W	8.77	11.47	7.58	1.24	5.12	10.67	5.12	10.67	16.37	<0.001
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant	D	10.09	9.27	6.78	1.25	3.96	9.53	3.96	9.53	18.44	<0.001

性状 Traits	处理 Deal	亲本Parents		RILs(n=71)Recombinant inbred Lines
性状 Traits	处理 Deal	PimaS-7	5917	均值 Mean value	标准差 Standard deviation	极小值 Min-value	极大值 Maximum	峰度 Kurtosis	偏度 Degree of deviation	变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%)	T检验 T test
株高 Plant height	W	74.15	96.49	74.42	8.79	55.75	101.18	55.75	101.18	11.81	<0.001
株高 Plant height	D	61.79	80.67	68.01	7.11	50.10	83.80	50.10	83.80	10.45	<0.001
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches	W	5.71	7.41	5.30	0.73	3.93	7.88	3.93	7.88	13.68	<0.001
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches	D	6.47	6.51	4.91	0.70	3.44	6.74	3.44	6.74	14.21	<0.001
铃数 Number of bells	W	9.69	10.55	7.05	0.93	5.13	9.82	5.13	9.82	13.20	<0.037
铃数 Number of bells	D	9.58	8.24	7.43	1.16	4.76	10.19	4.76	10.19	15.59	<0.037
有效铃数 Effective number of bells	W	7.70	9.03	6.14	0.91	4.31	9.24	4.31	9.24	14.79	0.007
有效铃数 Effective number of bells	D	8.25	6.99	5.75	0.85	4.04	7.45	4.04	7.45	14.78	0.007
单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight	W	1.21	1.26	1.24	0.12	1.00	1.59	1.00	1.59	9.49	0.008
单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight	D	1.28	1.31	1.19	0.13	0.83	1.45	0.83	1.45	10.96	0.008
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton	W	24.07	35.32	21.28	3.22	15.48	30.85	15.48	30.85	15.15	<0.001
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton	D	26.94	26.33	18.95	3.20	11.73	24.98	11.73	24.98	16.91	<0.001
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant	W	8.77	11.47	7.58	1.24	5.12	10.67	5.12	10.67	16.37	<0.001
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant	D	10.09	9.27	6.78	1.25	3.96	9.53	3.96	9.53	18.44	<0.001

性状 Traits	株高 Plant height	有效果枝数 Number of effective branches	铃数 Number of bells	有效铃数 Effective number of bells	单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight	单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton	单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant
株高Plant height	1
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches	0.430^**	1
铃数Number of bells	0.444^**	0.767^**	1
有效铃数Effective number of bells	0.446^**	0.852^**	0.826^**	1
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight	-0.160	-0.126	-0.144	-0.128	1
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton	0.372^**	0.730^**	0.726^**	0.824^**	0.336^**	1
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant	0.291^*	0.690^**	0.640^**	0.830^**	0.434^**	0.933^**	1

海岛棉重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性评价

Evaluation on Drought Resistance of Recombinant Inbred Lines of Gossypium barbadense L. at Flowering and Boll Stages

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

性状Traits	因子载荷Load factor
性状Traits	PC₁	PC₂
株高Plant height	0.59	-0.28
有效果枝数Number of effective branches	0.90	-0.03
铃数Number of bells	0.89	-0.09
有效铃数Effective number of bells	0.96	0.02
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight	-0.09	0.96
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton	0.87	0.44
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant	0.81	0.56
特征值Eigenvalues	4.35	1.43
贡献率Contribution rate	60.89	21.63
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate	60.89	82.52
因子权重Factor weight	0.74	0.26

类群 Group	分类 Classification	抗旱等级 Drought resistance rating	平均D值 Mean of D	数量 Quantity
1	较敏旱型材料	III	0.42	29
2	抗旱型材料	II	0.60	27
3	敏旱型材料	IV	0.23	14
4	强抗旱型材料	I	0.84	3
2	PimaS-7	II	0.62
3	5917	IV	0.34

模型项 Model project	系数 Coefficient	标准系数 Standard coefficient	T检验 T test	显著性 Statistical significance	容差 Tolerance	共线性 Collinearity
调整R² Adjusted R-Square	0.999
德宾德宾-瓦特逊检验Durbin-Watson test	2.022
常量Constant	-0.771		-80.652	<0.001
株高DCPlant height DC	0.089	0.071	18.313	<0.001	0.720	1.390
有效果枝数DC Number of effective branches DC	0.173	0.179	28.208	<0.001	0.270	3.697
铃数DCNumber of bells DC	0.132	0.155	25.594	<0.001	0.296	3.373
有效铃数DCEffective number of bells DC	0.343	0.413	42.617	<0.001	0.116	8.610
单铃皮棉重DCLint boll weight DC	0.338	0.254	42.826	<0.001	0.311	3.212
单株籽棉产量DCYield of single plant seed cotton DC	0.230	0.267	25.583	<0.001	0.100	9.975

[1]	曾婉盈, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤, 李思忠, 钱松廷, 高卫时, 张立明. 甜菜品系叶丛快速生长期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151.
[2]	张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[3]	马合木提·阿不来提, 木合塔尔·扎热, 米热古力·外力, 哈地尔·依沙克. 核桃叶缘焦枯病与其养分含量的相关性回归分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 945-953.
[4]	黄幸磊, 王为然, 王萌, 朱家辉, 林峰, 秦国礼, 杨静, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 吴全忠, 孔杰. 海岛棉种质资源机采农艺性状相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 1-8.
[5]	段松江, 彭增莹, 申莹莹, 木丽迪尔·拜波拉提, 吴一凡, 崔建平, 张巨松. 不同海岛棉品种产量及纤维品质对氮肥的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579.
[6]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[7]	秦国礼, 王为然, 王萌, 杨静, 黄幸磊, 刘志清, 朱家辉, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 孔杰, 陈国栋. 草甘膦对海岛棉农艺性状及光合作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2861-2868.
[8]	刘晨曦, 朱雨婷, 周强, 陈瑾, 赵文杰, 郑凯. 海岛棉β-胡萝卜素异构酶GbD27-6基因克隆及表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2869-2877.
[9]	陈丽, 马静, 朱志明, 刘炜, 孙建昌. 基于水稻RIL群体的加工品质性状QTL分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2419-2425.
[10]	马晓梅, 李保成, 董承光, 周小凤, 王新, 田琴, 赵素琴, 王刚. 早熟陆地棉品种叶片形态学指标与脱叶规律相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1301-1311.
[11]	宋吉坤, 辛玥, 李龙云, 刘国元, 裴文锋, 马建江, 曲延英, 于霁雯, 吴嫚. 利用基因芯片分析比较Giza75和SG747纤维发育差异表达基因[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1312-1330.
[12]	杨静, 王为然, 王萌, 朱家辉, 宁新民, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 闵玲, 孔杰. 新疆海岛棉胚性愈伤组织培养体系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1321-1329.
[13]	陆小双, 张梦洁, 韩万里, 龙遗磊, 刘鹏飞, 陈全家, 曲延英, 邓晓娟. 海岛棉抗枯萎病性状与 SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2365-2373.
[14]	窦巧巧, 张玮涛, 陈秀玲, 何庆雨, 代健敏, 段松江, 张巨松. 花铃期水分亏缺对不同部位果枝棉铃发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(7): 1177-1186.
[15]	闵凯丽, 晁祥保, 滕露, 蔡永生, 雷慧辰, 严中建, 郑凯, 陈全家. 海岛棉GbHCT10基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 206-215.