不同生态区新疆主栽春小麦品种品质相关性状表现及稳定性

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.12.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究新疆春小麦主栽品种在不同生态区品质相关性状表现及稳定性。方法在4个不同生态区,以新疆8个不同筋力春小麦主栽品种为研究对象,基于小麦品质相关10个性状,利用PertenDA7200型近红外分析仪按AACC39-10方法,测定籽粒蛋白质含量等10个品质指标,分析新疆8个主栽春小麦品种不同生态条件下品质性状表现。结果 8个参试品种籽粒蛋白质含量:14.28%、面筋度:31.21g/100 g、面团稳定时间:8.41 min、吸水率:58.53%、沉降值:31.27 mL、面粉出粉率:74.40%、最大拉伸阻力Rm:716.25EU、延伸度E:165.70mm、拉伸面积:119.33cm ²、容重:793.97g/L。参试强筋组4个品种10个品质性状中面粉出粉率、吸水率和容重3个性状平均表现低于中筋组,其余包括籽粒蛋白质含量、面筋度、面团稳定时间、沉降值、最大拉伸阻力、延伸度、拉伸面积7个品质性状的平均表现都高于中筋组。强筋组参试品种新春26号、新春44号在4个不同生态区品质性状与稳定性表现较好,中筋组参试品种新春6号、新春40号在4个不同生态区品质性状与稳定性表现较好。籽粒蛋白质含量、面筋度、和吸水率3个品质性状强筋组基因型效应最大,中筋组环境效应最大;其余7个品质性状强筋、中筋组均表现环境效应最大。结论 8个参试品种品质整体表现属中强筋水平。10个品质性状均受基因型、环境以及互作共同影响;不同筋力类型参试品种不同品质性状基因型、环境以及两者互作效应不同。不同参试品种同一品质性状稳定性存在差异,同一参试品种的不同品质性状稳定性也存在差异。中筋组新春6号、新春40号品质性状表现好且稳定性高,属春小麦育种核心亲本材料;强筋组新春26号、新春44号品质性状表现好且稳定性高,可用于新疆春小麦品质改良。

关键词: 春小麦; 不同生态区; 品质性状

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the performance and stability of quality-related characters of the major varieties of Xinjiang spring wheat in four different ecological regions. 【Methods】 In the four different ecological regions, eight major cultivars of Xinjiang spring wheat with different gluten strengths were taken as research object and based on the quality-related characters of the wheat, ten quality indexes, including grain protein content, were determined with the aid of PertenDA7200 near-infrared analyzer and with the method of AACC39-10 under different ecological conditions. 【Results】 Content of the grain protein14.28%, degree of gluten strength31.21g/100 g, dough stabilization time: 8.41min, water absorption58.53%, sedimentation value 31.27 mL, flour yield 74.40%, maximum tensile resistance Rm 716.25EU, extension E 165.70 mm, stretching area 119.33 cm ², volume weight793.97 g/L. Among the ten quality characters, flour yield (%), water absorption (%) and volume weight (g/L) of the four varieties in strong gluten strength group were lower than those in middle gluten strength group. The average performance of the other seven quality characters, including content of the grain protein, degree of gluten strength, dough stabilization time, sedimentation value, maximum tensile resistance, extension and stretching area of the four varieties in strong gluten strength group were higher than those in middle gluten strength group. The character and stability of Xinchun No. 26 and Xinchun No. 44 in strong gluten strength group tested and that of Xinchun No. 6 and Xinchun No. 40 in middle gluten strength group tested all had good performance in four different ecological regions. According to the quality-related characters F test, three characters of content of the grain protein, degree of gluten strength and water absorption had the largest genotype effect in strong gluten strength group and the largest environmental effect in middle gluten strength group, and the other seven characters had the largest environmental effect both in strong gluten strength group and middle gluten strengthgroup. 【Conclusion】 Referring to the review and approval standards for national-level wheat variety, overall quality of the eight varieties tested is evaluated as moderately strong gluten strength level. Ten quality characters are all affected by genotype, environment and interaction; Genotype, environment, and interaction effects of different quality characters of different varieties tested with different gluten strength are different. Stability of the same quality character of different varieties tested is different, and that of different quality characters of the same variety tested is also different. Xinchun No. 6 and Xinchun No. 40 in middle gluten strength group have good performance in character and high stability, and they are the core parent material of spring wheat breeding; Xinchun No. 26 and Xinchun No. 44 in strong gluten strength group have good performance in character and high stability, which can be used for quality improvement in Xinjiang spring wheat.

Key words: spring wheat; different ecological regions; quality character

中图分类号:

S512

李剑峰, 樊哲儒, 张跃强, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 赵奇. 不同生态区新疆主栽春小麦品种品质相关性状表现及稳定性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2157-2168.

LI Jianfeng, FAN Zheru, ZHANG Yueqiang, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, ZHAO Qi. Study on the Performance of Quality-related Characters of Main Spring Wheat Planted in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2157-2168.

图/表 13

参考文献 19

[1]	吴新元, 芦静, 李冬, 等. 新疆不同类型冬小麦品种品质性状的生态变异[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010,47(2):274-280.
	WU Xinyuan, LU Jing, LI Dong, et al. Variation of different types of grain quality of winter wheat cultivars under different environments in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010,47(2):274-280.
[2]	朱玉平. 江苏省小麦品质性状分析及其分布探讨[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2016,33(3):64-68.
	ZHU Yuping. Assessment of quality properties of wheat varieties planted in Jiangsu province and strategies for improving wheat quality[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2016,33(3):64-68.
[3]	袁建, 鞠兴荣, 汪海峰, 等. 品种及种植地域对小麦主要品质性状影响的研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2000,15(5):54-57.
	YUAN Jian, JU Xingrong, WANG Haifeng, et al. Effects of varieties and planting areas on main quality characters of wheat[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2000,15(5):54-57.
[4]	薛香, 郜庆炉, 杨忠强, 等. 小麦品质性状的主成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(7):38-41.
	XUE Xiang, GAO Qinglu, YANG Zhongqiang, et al. Principal components analysis on major quality traits of winter wheat[J]. Agricultural Bulletin of China, 2011,27(7):38-41.
[5]	李志敏, 董中东, 阎旭霞, 等. 弱筋小麦农艺性状与籽粒蛋白质含量的相关性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007,35(31):9805-9806.
	LI Zhimin, DONG Zhongdong, YAN Xuxia, et al. Relativity analysis of agronomic traits and grain protein content in weak gluten wheat[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2007,35(31):9805-9806.
[6]	吕惠珠, 韩建林, 位国臣, 等. 小麦品质性状间的相关分析[J]. 莱阳农学院学报, 2002,19(4):267-269.
	LÜ Huizhu, HAN Jianlin, WEI Guochen, et al. Correlation analysis of wheat quality traits[J]. Journal of Laiyang Agricultural College, 2002,19(4):267-269.
[7]	郭天财, 张学林, 樊树平, 等. 不同环境条件对三种筋型小麦品质性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(6):917-920.
	GU0 Tiancai, ZHANG Xuelin, FAN Shuping, et al. Effects of different environments on qualitative characters of three gluten wheat cultivars[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003,14(6):917-920.
[8]	马冬云, 郭天财, 王晨阳, 等. 用AMMI模型分析小麦品种品质性状的稳定性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,33(4):74-78.
	MA Dongyun, GUO Tiancai, WANG Chenyang, et al. Analyzing the stability of wheat quality traits with AMMI model[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2005,33(4):74-78.
[9]	高欢欢, 李卫华, 穆培源, 等. 新疆春小麦品种品质性状主成分及聚类分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013,50(2):197-203.
	GAO Huanhuan, LI Weihua, MU Peiyuan, et al. Principal components and cluster analyses of Xinjiang spring wheat quality traits[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013,50(2):197-203.
[10]	张向前, 陈欢, 乔玉强, 等. 安徽不同生态区弱筋小麦产量和品质差异分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(12):1763-1771.
	ZHANG Xiangqian, CHEN Huan, QIAO Yuqiang. The Difference in yield and gluten wheat that planting in different ecological areas of Anhui province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2018,27(12):1763-1771.
[11]	赵广才, 万富世, 常旭虹, 等. 强筋小麦产量和蛋白质含量的稳定性及其调控研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(5):895-901.
	ZHAO Guangcai, WAN Fushi, CHANG Xuhong, et al. Study on stability and regulation of grain yield and protein content in strong gluten wheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007,40(5):895-901.
[12]	张学林, 郭天财, 朱云集, 等. 追氮时期对不同筋型小麦品质性状的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2006,40(2):113-116.
	ZHANG Xuelin, GUO Tiancai, ZHU Yunji, et al. Effects of nitrogen topdressing stage on quality characters of different kinds of gluten wheat[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2006,40(2):113-116.
[13]	贾辉辉, 冯国华, 刘东涛, 等. 长期定位施肥对不同筋力型小麦品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(6):850-855.
	JIA Huihui, FENG Guohua, LIU Dongtao, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization on quality ofwheat cultivars with different gluten contents[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015,35(6):850-855.
[14]	樊虎玲, 郝明德, 李志西, 等. 黄土高原旱地化肥和有机肥配施对小麦品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005,23(5):72-76.
	FAN Huling, HAO Mingde, LI Zhixi, et al. Effect of fertilizer and organic fertilizer on wheat quality in dryland of Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2005,23(5):72-76.
[15]	桑伟, 穆培源, 徐红军, 等. 新疆春小麦品种主要品质性状及其与新疆拉面加工品质的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2008,25(5):772-779.
	SANG Wei, MU Peiyuan, XU Hongjun, et al. Main quality traits of the spring wheat cultivars from xinjiang and their correlations with processing quality of Xinjiang hand—stretched noodle[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2008,25(5):772-779.
[16]	栾姗姗, 贾永红, 王伟, 等. 新疆春小麦品种蛋白质品质性状的变化[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013,22(1):41-47.
	LUAN Shanshan, JIA Yonghong, WANG Wei, et al. The change on protein quality characteristics ofdifferent spring wheat cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2013,22(1):41-47.
[17]	姚艳荣, 贾秀领, 马瑞崑, 等. 冀中南强筋小麦品种品质性状稳定性差异及地域和气候因子效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2006,21(z2):23-28.
	YAO Yanrong, JIA Xiuling, MA Ruikun, et al. Stability variation and regional climatic impact on quality of high-gluten wheat cultivars in central-south region of Hebei[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2006,21(z2):23-28.
[18]	乔玉强, 马传喜, 司红起, 等. 基因型和环境及其互作效应对小麦品质的影响及品质稳定性分析[J]. 激光生物学报, 2008,17(6):768-774.
	QIAO Yuqiang, MA Chuanxi, SI Hongqi, et al. The effects of genotype,environment and G×E interaction on wheat quality and the analysis of stability[J]. Acta Laser Biology Sinica, 2008,17(6):768-774.
[19]	孙振纲, 许琦. 小麦品质稳定性研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学, 2010,38(12):90-93.
	SUN Zhengang, XU Qi. Study on quality stability in wheat[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010,38(12):90-93.

品种 Varieties	蛋白含量 Protein content	效应 Effect	方差 Variance	变异度 Variability	回归系数 Regression coefficient	适应地区 Adaptation area	综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation
新春26号 Xinchun26	15.18	0.753	0.133	2.402	-0.061	E1~E4	很好
新春44号 Xinchun44	14.28	-0.152	0.405	4.457	-0.547	E2	不好
新春38号 Xinchun38	14.14	-0.290	0.111	2.355	1.633	E1~E4	较差
新春37号 Xinchun37	14.12	-0.310	0.730	6.050	2.975	E4	不好
新春6号 Xinchun6	14.41	0.282	0.258	3.523	0.552	E1~E4	很好
新春40号 Xinchun40	14.29	0.155	0.067	1.811	1.407	E1~E4	好
新春46号 Xinchun46	14.02	-0.107	0.365	4.309	0.127	E1~E4	一般
新春11号 Xinchun11	13.80	-0.330	0.269	3.754	1.913	E1~E4	较差

品种 Varieties	蛋白含量 Protein content	效应 Effect	方差 Variance	变异度 Variability	回归系数 Regression coefficient	适应地区 Adaptation area	综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation
新春26号 Xinchun26	15.18	0.753	0.133	2.402	-0.061	E1~E4	很好
新春44号 Xinchun44	14.28	-0.152	0.405	4.457	-0.547	E2	不好
新春38号 Xinchun38	14.14	-0.290	0.111	2.355	1.633	E1~E4	较差
新春37号 Xinchun37	14.12	-0.310	0.730	6.050	2.975	E4	不好
新春6号 Xinchun6	14.41	0.282	0.258	3.523	0.552	E1~E4	很好
新春40号 Xinchun40	14.29	0.155	0.067	1.811	1.407	E1~E4	好
新春46号 Xinchun46	14.02	-0.107	0.365	4.309	0.127	E1~E4	一般
新春11号 Xinchun11	13.80	-0.330	0.269	3.754	1.913	E1~E4	较差

品种 Varieties	面筋度 Gluten	效应 Effect	方差 Variance	变异度 Variability	回归系数 Regression coefficient	适应地区 Adaptation area	综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation
新春26号 Xinchun26	33.27	1.695	1.042	3.067	-0.928	E1	较好
新春44号 Xinchun44	31.36	-0.218	1.794	4.270	1.055	E1~E4	一般
新春38号 Xinchun38	30.85	-0.724	0.917	3.102	1.920	E1~E4	较差
新春37号 Xinchun37	30.82	-0.752	3.367	5.952	1.951	E4	不好
新春6号 Xinchun6	31.52	0.668	0.861	2.944	0.930	E1~E4	很好
新春40号 Xinchun40	31.05	0.202	0.290	1.733	1.336	E1~E4	较好
新春11号 Xinchun11	30.54	-0.306	0.753	2.840	1.588	E1~E4	一般
新春46号 Xinchun46	30.29	-0.564	2.565	5.287	0.145	E1~E4	较差

品种 Varieties	面筋度 Gluten	效应 Effect	方差 Variance	变异度 Variability	回归系数 Regression coefficient	适应地区 Adaptation area	综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation
新春26号 Xinchun26	33.27	1.695	1.042	3.067	-0.928	E1	较好
新春44号 Xinchun44	31.36	-0.218	1.794	4.270	1.055	E1~E4	一般
新春38号 Xinchun38	30.85	-0.724	0.917	3.102	1.920	E1~E4	较差
新春37号 Xinchun37	30.82	-0.752	3.367	5.952	1.951	E4	不好
新春6号 Xinchun6	31.52	0.668	0.861	2.944	0.930	E1~E4	很好
新春40号 Xinchun40	31.05	0.202	0.290	1.733	1.336	E1~E4	较好
新春11号 Xinchun11	30.54	-0.306	0.753	2.840	1.588	E1~E4	一般
新春46号 Xinchun46	30.29	-0.564	2.565	5.287	0.145	E1~E4	较差

品种 Varieties	稳定时间 Stability time (min)	效应 Effect	方差 Variance	变异度 Variability	回归系数 Regression coefficient	适应地区 Adaptation area	综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation
新春26号 Xinchun26	8.83	0.125	0.034	2.104	0.960	E1~E4	很好
新春38号 Xinchun38	8.77	0.064	0.087	3.361	0.824	E1~E4	好
新春44号 Xinchun44	8.67	-0.035	0.110	3.831	1.214	E1~E4	较好
新春37号 Xinchun37	8.55	-0.154	0.003	0.637	1.002	E1~E4	较差
新春11号 Xinchun11	8.63	0.496	0.285	6.186	1.104	E1~E4	很好
新春46号 Xinchun46	8.19	0.054	0.735	10.471	0.207	E1,E3	一般
新春40号 Xinchun40	8.00	-0.134	0.408	7.984	1.186	E1~E4	一般
新春6号 Xinchun6	7.72	-0.416	0.134	4.750	1.503	E1~E4	较差