新疆棉田硫丹防虫替代技术的筛选与评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.06.010

新疆农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (6): 1071-1080.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.06.010

新疆棉田硫丹防虫替代技术的筛选与评价

唐睿¹, 余浪², 高永健³, 王昊杨⁴, 郑哲⁴, 卡哈尔曼·胡吉², 杨涵⁵, 张金平¹, 张峰¹, 杨普云⁶, 郭荣⁶

1.植物病虫害生物学国家重点实验室/农业农村部-CABI生物安全联合实验室/中国农业科学院植物保护研究所,北京 100081;
2.新疆维吾尔自治区植保站,乌鲁木齐 830011;
3.沙湾县农业局,新疆沙湾 832100;
4.生态环境部对外合作与交流中心,北京 100035;
5.联合国开发计划署,北京 100600;
6.全国农业技术推广服务中心,北京 100125

收稿日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-05-11
通信作者: 郭荣(1962-),女,北京人,推广研究员,研究方向为农业病虫害防治,(E-mail)guorong@agri.gov.cn
作者简介:唐睿(1984-),男,云南昆明人,博士,研究方向为昆虫化学生态与生物防治,(E-mail)minamo@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0201908);全球环境基金中国硫丹淘汰项目(C/V/S/18/019)

Assessment and screen of alternative pest control approaches for endosulfan in Xinjiang cotton production area

TANG Rui¹, YU Lang², GAO Yongjian³, WANG Haoyang⁴, ZHENG Zhe⁴, Kahaerman Huji², YANG Han⁵, ZHANG Jinping¹, ZHANG Feng¹, YANG Puyun⁶, GUO Rong⁶

1.State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests/MARA-CABI Joint Laboratory for Bio-safety, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2.Xinjiang Provincial Plant Protection Centre, Urumqi 830011, China;
3.Shawan Plant Protection Bureau, Shihezi Xinjiang 832100, China;
4.Foreign Economic Cooperation Office, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100035, China;
5.UNDP, Beijing 100600, China;
6.NATESC, Beijing 100125, China

Received:2020-01-20 Published:2020-05-11
Correspondence author: GUO Rong (1962-), female, born in Beijing, applied principal investigator, research on crop pest management and extension,(E-mail) guorong@agri.gov.cn
Supported by:
Supported by the National Key R & D Program Project (2017YFD0201908);China Endosulfan Phase-out Project of GEF (C/V/S/18/019)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】筛选集成新疆棉区可替代硫丹的害虫防治技术方法,推动农药减量及硫丹淘汰进程。【方法】在新疆棉区,选择14种硫丹替代方法,针对二代和三代棉铃虫及兼治蚜虫进行小区试验,评价替代方法的防效、社会及生态效益,选择最优方法用于集成适合新疆的棉田害虫综合治理模型。【结果】信息素诱捕田最高日均诱蛾量(15 ± 2.6)头,对照自防田为(22.2 ± 8.6)头,未见显著差异;针对兼治蚜虫减退率比较,中剂量甲维盐(-70.00 ± 27.10)%及甲维·虱螨脲(-67.32± 44.51)% 均显著低于硫丹对照(20.07 ± 17.81)%;田间益虫调查显示草蛉为主要优势种,最高占比81%,实验处理对瓢虫影响最大,最高占比由48%下降至18%;测产发现氟苯虫酰胺(低剂量)及阿维·氯虫苯甲酰胺(高剂量)每667 m²收入较硫丹可分别提高161.07和157.53元;PCA及聚类分析显示硫丹加权分15,其他处理中加权超20最佳替代方法4个,加权超15优秀替代方法3个。【结论】与硫丹相比,性信息素诱捕、氯虫苯甲酰胺、棉铃虫核型多角体病毒和苏云金杆菌4种替代方法表现最佳;短稳杆菌、氟苯虫酰胺和甲维·虱螨脲3种替代方法表现与硫丹相当。以上7种替代方法可以作为制定棉区害虫综合治理的方案。

关键词: 棉铃虫; 硫丹; 害虫综合治理

Abstract: 【Objective】 Screening integrated pest management method and technology that can replace endosulfan in Xinjiang cotton areas to promote agricultural pesticide and fertilization reduction and elimination of endosulfan.【Method】The selected 14 kinds of endosulfan replacement methods were used in the 755 acres of Xinjiang cotton area to conduct field plot trials on the second and third generation cotton bollworms and concurrently on aphids. The social and ecological benefits of the alternative methods were evaluated in order to develop integrated pest management approach for cotton field in Xinjiang.【Result】The highest daily average moth trapping rate of (15 ± 2.6) moths in the H. armigera pheromone trapping field and (22.2 ± 8.6) moths in the conventional field was not significantly different. For the comparison of the aphid control effects among treatments, the medium dose of emamectin benzoate (-70.00 ± 27.10) %and emamectin benzoate/lufenuron (-67.32 ± 44.51) %were significantly lower than that of the endosulfan control (20.07± 17.81)% .The field beneficial insect survey showed that lacewing was the dominant species with the highest percentage of 81%, and the experimental treatment had the greatest impact on ladybirds, the highest percentage of which decreased from 48% to 18%. PCA and cluster analysis showed a weighted score of 15 for endosulfan, four best alternatives weighted above 20 in other treatments and three excellent alternatives weighted above 15.【Conclusion】Results showed that 4 alternatives including sex pheromone trapping, chlorantraniliprole, Helicoverpa armigera NPV, and Bacillus thuringiensis were superior to endosulfan. The other 3 methods including Empedobacter brevis, flubendiamide, and emamectin benzonate/lufenuron were excellent alternatives which are comparable to endosulfan. According to the test results and the local cotton planting situation, it is recommended to combine the above 7 alternative methods in developing cotton IPM strategies in Xinjiang cotton production area.

Key words: Helicoverpa armigera; Endosulfan; integrated pest management

中图分类号:

S562
S482

唐睿, 余浪, 高永健, 王昊杨, 郑哲, 卡哈尔曼·胡吉, 杨涵, 张金平, 张峰, 杨普云, 郭荣. 新疆棉田硫丹防虫替代技术的筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6): 1071-1080.

TANG Rui, YU Lang, GAO Yongjian, WANG Haoyang, ZHENG Zhe, Kahaerman Huji, YANG Han, ZHANG Jinping, ZHANG Feng, YANG Puyun, GUO Rong. Assessment and screen of alternative pest control approaches for endosulfan in Xinjiang cotton production area[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6): 1071-1080.

参考文献

[1] 提博雯,王杰,刘建国,等.中国履行斯德哥尔摩公约淘汰硫丹的社会经济影响[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(8): 1241-1248.
TI Bowen, WANG Jie, LIU Jianguo, et al. Social-economic analysis of endosulfan phase-out for China to implement the Stockholm Convention[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(8): 1241-1248.
[2] Brun, L. O., Marcillaud, C., Gaudichon, et al. Endosulfan resistance in Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New Caledonia [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1989, 82(5), 1311-1316.
[3] 魏嘉柳,周显青.硫丹的毒性及相关机制研究进展[J].河南农业,2019,9:54-55.
WEI Jialiu, ZHOU Xianqing, (2019) Research progress on toxicity and related mechanisms of endosulfan [J]. He Nan Nong Ye, 2019, 9: 54-55.
[4] 贾宏亮.硫丹在中国土壤大气中空间分布及传播的研究[D].大连:大连海事大学,2010.
JIA Hongliang. Distribution and Transport of Endosulfan in Chinese Soil and Air [D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2010.
[5] 吴孔明,陆宴辉,王振营.我国农业害虫综合防治研究现状与展望[J].昆虫知识,2009,46(6): 831-836.
WU Kongming, LU Yanhui, WANG Zhenying, Advance in integrated pest management of crops in China [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2009, 46(6): 831-836.
[6] 陆宴辉,赵紫华,蔡晓明,等.我国农业害虫综合防治研究进展[J].应用昆虫学报,2017,54(3): 349-363.
LU Yanhui, ZHAO Zihua, CAI Xiaoming, et al. Progresses on integrated pest management (IPM) of agricultural insect pests in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2017, 54(3): 349-363.
[7] 姜玉英,刘杰,曾娟,等.棉铃虫种群调查及测报技术[J].应用昆虫学报,2018,55(1): 132-137.
JIANG Yuying, LIU Jie, ZENG Juan, et al. Investigation and forecasting techniques for the cotton bollworm [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2018, 55(1): 132-137.
[8] 姜玉英,陆宴辉,李晶,等.新疆棉花病虫害演变动态及其影响因子分析[J].中国植保导刊,2015,35(11): 43-48.
JIANG Yuying, LU Yanhui, LI Jing, et al. (2015) Evolution of cotton diseases and pests in Xinjiang and analysis of its influencing factors [J]. China Plant Protection, 2015, 35(11): 43-48.
[9] 冉聃,鲁建江,姚晓瑞,等.新疆典型地区农业土壤中有机氯农药(OCPs)分布特征及风险评价[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(3):225-229.
RAN Dan, LU Jianjiang, YAO Xiaorui, et al. Distribution and risk assessment of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in soils of typical agricultural regions in Xinjiang [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 28(3): 225-229.
[10] 潘洪生,姜玉英,王佩玲,等.新疆棉花害虫发生演替与综合防治研究进展[J].植物保护,2018,44(5): 42-50.
PAN Hongsheng, JIANG Yuying, WANG Peiling, et al. Research progress in the status evolution and integrated control of cotton pests in Xinjiang [J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(5): 42-50.
[11] 陆宴辉.Bt棉花害虫综合治理研究前沿[J].应用昆虫学报,2012,49(4): 809-819.
LU Yanhui. Advance in insect pest management in Bt cotton worldwide [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2012, 49(4): 809-819.
[12] 张丹丹,杨现明,陆宴辉,等.六种杀虫剂对棉铃虫的毒力效果比较[J].应用昆虫学报,2018,55(1): 61-66.
ZHANG Dandan, YANG Xianming, LU Yanhui, et al. Comparison of the toxicity of six insecticides against the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2018, 55(1): 61-66.
[13] 修春丽,栗爱丽,路伟,等.棉铃虫食诱剂的田间诱捕效果[J].应用昆虫学报,2018,55(1): 44-48.
XIU Chunli, LI Aili, LU Wei, et al. The effectiveness of using food attractant to lure cotton bollworm moths into traps under field conditions [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2018, 55(1): 44-48.
[14] 余月书,杨益众,陆宴辉,等.棉田棉铃虫寄生蜂对常规棉及转Bt棉品种的趋性反应[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(5): 845-848.
YU Yueshu, YANG Yizhong, LU Yanhui, et al. Response of parasitic wasps of cotton bollworm to different cotton varieties with transgenic Bacillus thringienthsis genes [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(5): 845-848.
[15] 蔡晓明,李兆群,潘洪生,等.植食性害虫食诱剂的研究与应用[J].中国生物防治学报,2018,34(1): 8-35.
CAI Xiaoming, LI Zhaoqun, PAN Hongsheng, et al. Research and application of food-based attractants of herbivorous insect pests [J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2018, 34(1): 8-35.
[16] 姜玉英,刘杰,曾娟,等.新疆棉区盲蝽等棉田昆虫灯诱效果研究[J].中国植保导刊,2017,37(4): 49-55.
JIANG Yuying, LIU Jie, ZENG Juan, et al. (2017) Study on effect of light traps for cotton field pest including mirid bugs in Xinjiang cotton plantation area [J]. China Plant Protection, 2017, 37(4): 49-55.
[17] 陆宴辉,张永军,吴孔明,等.植食性昆虫的寄主选择机理及行为调控策略[J].生态学报,2008,28(10): 5113-5122.
LU Yanhui, ZHANG Yongjun, WU Kongming, et al. Host plant selection mechanisms and behavioural manipulation strategies of phytophagous insects [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(10): 5113-5122.
[18] 吴孔明,陆宴辉.种植Bt棉花可有效控制棉铃虫在我国多作物生态系统中的发生与危害[J].中国基础科学,2009,11(3): 27-28.
WU Kongming, LU Yanhui. Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt toxin containing cotton [J]. China Basic Science, 2009, 11(3): 27-28.
[19] Liu, B., Yang, L., Yang, F., Wang, Q., Yang, Y., Lu, Y., & Gardiner, M. M. Landscape diversity enhances parasitism of cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) eggs by Trichogramma chilonis in cotton [J]. Biological Control, 2016, 93, 15-23.
[20] Ruberson J R , Nemoto H, Hirose Y. Pesticides and conservation of natural enemies in pest management [J]. Conservation Biological Control, 1998, 20(2):207-220.

新疆棉田硫丹防虫替代技术的筛选与评价

Assessment and screen of alternative pest control approaches for endosulfan in Xinjiang cotton production area

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	窦亚楠, 孙小诺, 安静杰, 高占林, 郭江龙, 党志红, 李耀发. 四氯虫酰胺对棉铃虫生物活性的温度效应及其解毒酶相关机制[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1447-1453.
[2]	李维政, 宁忠雄, 梁赫, 路伟. UPLC-MS/MS测定棉铃虫体内丁布的残留量[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1846-1850.
[3]	马星宇, 嵇玉洁, 薛玉莹, 杜孟芳, 魏纪珍, 尹新明, 刘晓光, 安世恒. 棉铃虫鞣化激素基因克隆及分子特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4): 589-599.
[4]	嵇玉洁, 马星宇, 宋永辉, 杜孟芳, 魏纪珍, 尹新明, 刘晓光, 安世恒. 棉铃虫鞣化激素β亚基参与脂肪组织免疫的相关功能基因表达模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4): 600-607.
[5]	于健, 查萌, 郑梦君, 刘小侠. 白僵菌和绿僵菌对棉铃虫的室内防控效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4): 608-615.
[6]	芦屹, 王惠卿, 魏新政, 高永健, 代明, 李晶. 害虫远程实时监测系统监测棉铃虫成虫消长动态[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3): 521-527.
[7]	马天文;王俊刚;何泽敏;江海澜;邓小霞;彭俊. 甲氨蝶呤和紫杉醇对棉铃虫繁育能力的影响[J]. , 2012, 49(3): 482-487.
[8]	何海;朱燕;刘宁;晁群芳;刘小宁. 棉铃虫中肠谷胱甘肽S-转移酶(GST)对新疆一枝蒿黄酮提取物和萜类提取物的响应[J]. , 2012, 49(12): 2254-2262.
[9]	汪小东;武万锋;张建华;赵伊英. 石河子地区棉田棉铃虫种群体内相关酶活及含量的测定[J]. , 2012, 49(12): 2239-2244.
[10]	邓菲菲;王登元;于江南. 天山北坡棉铃虫遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. , 2012, 49(10): 1891-1896.
[11]	何海;黄丽;张学涛;张雷;李芬;刘小宁. 新疆一枝蒿与黄花蒿粗提物抗棉铃虫与棉蚜的特性研究[J]. , 2011, 48(5): 889-895.
[12]	吴莉莉;王登元;吕昭智;马睿. 转基因抗虫棉田棉铃虫庇护所的建立和评价[J]. , 2011, 48(2): 334-339.
[13]	王剑;王锁牢;李号宾;李广阔;姚举;王伟. 几种药剂对新疆南疆地区棉花棉铃虫的防效[J]. , 2010, 47(6): 1162-1165.
[14]	杜文晓;王登元;于江南;李贤超. 新疆棉区棉铃虫对Bt毒蛋白(Cry1Ac蛋白)敏感基线的测定[J]. , 2010, 47(5): 902-905.
[15]	王冬梅;李建平;孟庆玉. Bt杀虫蛋白在转基因抗虫棉中的表达[J]. , 2010, 47(3): 495-498.