5种杀虫剂拌种处理对棉花苗蚜的田间防效及安全性评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.04.004

新疆农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 616-622.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.04.004

5种杀虫剂拌种处理对棉花苗蚜的田间防效及安全性评价

涂学为^1,2, 安静杰², 窦亚楠^1,2, 高占林², 党志红², 潘文亮², 赵国存³, 李耀发²

1.河北农业大学植物保护学院, 河北保定 071001;
2.河北省农林科学院植物保护研究所/河北省农业有害生物综合防治工程技术研究中心/农业农村部华北北部作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,河北保定 071000;
3.河北省农药检定监测总站,石家庄 050031

收稿日期:2019-11-04 发布日期:2020-03-26
通信作者: 李耀发(1977-),男,研究员,博士,硕/博士生导师,研究方向为农业昆虫与害虫防治,(E-mail)liyaofa@126.com
作者简介:涂学为(1993-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为农药学,(E-mail)2192347525@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0201906);河北省现代农业产业技术体系(HBCT2018040204);河北省农林科学院财政项目(F18C10001)

Evaluation of the Safety and Control Effects of Five Insecticides Seed Dressing on Cotton Seedling Aphids

TU Xuewei^1,2, AN Jingjie², DOU Yanan^1,2, GAO Zhanlin², DANG Zhihong², PAN Wenliang², ZHAO Guocun³, LI Yaofa²

1.College of Plant Protection, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding Hebei 071001, China;
2.Plant Protection Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/IPM Center of Hebei Province/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Baoding Hebei 071000, China;
3.Master Station of Pesticide Control and Monitoring of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China

Received:2019-11-04 Published:2020-03-26
Correspondence author: Li Yaofa (1977-), male, researcher, PhD. Research area is agricultural insect and pest control,(E-mail)liyaofa@126.com
Supported by:
Supported by the Nation Key R & D Project (2017YFD0201906); Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Project of Hebei Province (HBCT2018040204); Financial Project of HAAFS (F18C10001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】评价5种供试杀虫剂拌种处理对棉花苗蚜防效和棉花苗期的安全性,以获得拌种处理防效优于吡虫啉的替代药剂。【方法】测定棉籽7 d室内发芽势和14 d田间出苗率,评价供试杀虫剂在供试剂量下(4.20 g/kg种子)对棉花出苗和苗期生长的安全性。田间拌种处理,评价5种杀虫剂对棉花苗蚜的防控效果和持效期,并与常规药剂喷雾防治棉花苗蚜进行比较,评价2种方法对防控棉花苗蚜的效果。【结果】5种杀虫剂拌种处理均与空白对照没有显著性差异,对棉花出苗和苗期生长安全;在棉花播种后至25 d内,各供试杀虫剂均能有效控制棉花苗蚜种群,各处理间无显著性差异。播种后32 d各药剂处理防效均开始快速下降,其中50%吡蚜酮WG和20%噻虫胺CF防效最高,但仅为59.43%和55.52%。播种后39d仅20%噻虫胺CF防效为51.09%,其余处理百株蚜量接近或者高于空白对照;5%啶虫脒EC和10%吡虫啉WP对棉花苗蚜喷雾防控作用仅可维持3 d左右,至药后7 d,需继续采用药剂喷雾处理。【结论】与喷雾处理相比,拌种处理可以更长效的保护棉花,以更好的减少苗蚜的危害。5种杀虫剂拌种处理中,20%噻虫胺CF和50%吡蚜酮WG拌种防治棉花苗蚜均表现出了较好的防控效果。

关键词: 棉蚜; 噻虫胺; 拌种; 田间药效; 安全性

Abstract: 【Objective】 This study aims to evaluate the safety of five insecticides in the control of cotton seedlings and control effect to seedling aphids of cotton seed dressing in the hope of obtaining alternative insecticides whose control effects are superior to imidacloprid by the same treatment.【Method】 The authors evaluated the safety of the tested insecticides for cotton seed germination rate and seedling growth at the tested dose (4.20 g/kg seeds) by measuring the indoor germination potential of cotton seeds for 7 days and the field emergence rate for 14 days. In addition, the control effects and their persistence of the tested insecticides at the seedling period were evaluated by field seed dressing method. Finally we compared the spraying and seed dressing method on controlling cotton aphid to see their advantages and disadvantages.【Result】 Under the selected dosage, the results of indoor germination rate and field emergence rate revealed that there was no significant difference between the tested insecticides seed dressing and CK. It showed that 5 insecticides were safe to cotton emergence and seedling growth and the results of field control effects showed all the 5 insecticides could effectively control the population of cotton aphids and there were no significant difference between the treatments until 25 days after cotton sowing. Till 32 days after cotton sowing, the control effects of these insecticides begin to decline rapidly. Among them, 50% pymetrozine WG and 20% clothianidin CF had the highest control effects, but which were only 59.43% and 55.52%. On the 39 days after cotton sowing, only the control effects of 20% clothianidin CF was 51.09%, and the aphids per 100 plants of the remaining treatments were close to or higher than those of the CK. Spraying results showed that 5% acetamidine EC and 10% imidacloprid WP could only control cotton aphids well in 3 days, and the agent needed to be used again 7 days later.【Conclusion】 Compared with spray treatment, seed dressing could protect cotton more effectively and reduce the harm of cotton aphids better. Under the selected dosage, both 20% clothianidin CF and 50% pymetrozine WG all showed better effects on controlling cotton seeding aphids by seed dressing method, which could be used as alternative insecticides for cotton seedling aphids.

Key words: Aphis gossypii Glover; insecticides; seed dressing; control effects; safety

中图分类号:

S433.3

涂学为, 安静杰, 窦亚楠, 高占林, 党志红, 潘文亮, 赵国存, 李耀发. 5种杀虫剂拌种处理对棉花苗蚜的田间防效及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4): 616-622.

TU Xuewei, AN Jingjie, DOU Yanan, GAO Zhanlin, DANG Zhihong, PAN Wenliang, ZHAO Guocun, LI Yaofa. Evaluation of the Safety and Control Effects of Five Insecticides Seed Dressing on Cotton Seedling Aphids[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 616-622.

参考文献

[1] 姜伟丽, 马小艳, 任相亮, 等. 不同施药方式下6种药剂对棉蚜的防治效果研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(6): 12-14, 30.
JIANG Weili, MA Xiaoyan, REN Xiangliang, et al. Efficacy of Six Kinds of Insecticides to Control Cotton Aphid, Aphis gossypii (Glover) under Different Application Methods [J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(6): 12-14, 30.
[2] 崔丽, 张靖, 齐浩亮, 等. 我国棉花主产区棉蚜对吡虫啉的抗性监测及抗性机理[J]. 昆虫学报, 2016, 59(11): 1246-1253.
CUI Li, ZHANG Jing, QI Haoliang, et al. Monitoring and mechanisms of imidacloprid resistance in Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphidiidae) in the main cotton production areas of China [J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2016, 59(11):1246-1253.
[3] 姜运涛, 马德英, 杨保环, 等. 20%吡虫啉SL不同施药方式对棉田天敌数量动态影响的比较[J]. 农药, 2009, 48(8): 586-587, 590.
JIANG Yuntao, MA Deying, YANG Baohuan, et al. Compared the Effect of Imidacloprid 20% SL Applied in Different Methods to Quantity Dynamic of the Natural Enemies in Cotton Field [J]. Pesticides, 2009, 48(8): 586-587, 590.
[4] 杨德慧, 柳海营, 陈英化, 等. 70%噻虫胺种子处理可分散粉剂的研制及其对棉蚜的防治[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2014, 37(6): 67-72.
YANG Dehui, LIU Haiying, CHEN Yinghua, et al. Preparation of 70% clothianidin seed treatment dispersible powders and its control on cotton aphid [J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2014, 37(6): 67-72.
[5] 冯建国. 浅谈种衣剂的研究开发[J]. 世界农药, 2010, 32(1): 48-52.
Feng Jianguo. Discussion on the Development of seed coating [J]. World Pesticides, 2010, 32(1): 48-52
[6] 王宁堂. 种子包衣技术研究现状、问题及对策[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2011, 57(5): 131-133.
WANG Ningtang. Present Situation, Problems and Countermeasure of Researching to Seed Coating [J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 57 (5): 131-133.
[7] 赵鸣, 薛超, 王仲敏, 等. 种子处理与药剂喷雾对棉花苗蚜的防治比较[J]. 山东农业科学, 2012, 44(12): 85-87.
ZHAO Ming, XUE Chao, WANG Zhongmin, et al. Comparison on Control Effect of Seed Treatment and Pesticide Spraying on Cotton Seedling Aphids [J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 44(12): 85-87.
[8] 李耀发, 党志红, 潘文亮,等. 新烟碱类杀虫剂噻虫胺拌种防治麦蚜的田间药效及安全性评价[J]. 农药, 2013, 52(9): 689-691.
LI Yaofa, DANG Zhihong, PAN Wenliang, et al. Evaluation on the Safety and Field Effect of the Seed Dressing by Neonicotinoid Insecticides Clothianidin to Control Wheat Aphids [J].Pesticides, 2013, 52 (9): 689-691.
[9]冯维卓, 唐立丰. 吡虫啉拌种防治棉蚜的效果及对棉株性状的影响[J]. 农药, 1995, 34 (6): 10-11.
FENG Weizhuo, TANG Lifeng. The Control Efficiency of Seed Dressing with Imidacloprid for Cotton Aphid and the Effect of Cotton Appearance. [J].Pesticides, 1995, 34 (6):10-11.
[10] 王猛. 新烟碱类杀虫剂防治棉花苗期害虫的局部施药技术研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
WANG Meng. Research on the topical administration of neonicotinoid insecticides to control cotton seedling pests [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014.
[11] 安静杰, 党志红, 高占林, 等. 河北省棉蚜对新烟碱类杀虫剂敏感基线及抗药性水平[J].河北农业大学学报, 2018, 41(4): 112-116.
AN Jingjie, DANG Zhihong, GAO Zhanlin, et al. Sensitivity baseline and resistance of Hebei Aphis gossypii Glover population to neonicotinoid insecticides[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2018, 41(4): 112-116.
[12] 何茂华, 罗万春, 慕立义. 防治蚜虫、白粉虱的新颖杀虫剂—吡蚜酮(pymertrozine)[J].世界农药, 2002, 24 (2):46-47, 44.
HE Maohua, LUO Wanchun, MU Liyi. The novel insecticide-pymertrozine for controlling Aphidoidea and Trialeurodes vaporariorum [J].World Pesticide, 2012, 24 (2):46-47, 44.
[13]郭如文, 朱文龙, 郭春华, 等. 新型药剂吡蚜酮拌种防治灰飞虱控制直播稻苗期条纹叶枯病防效初探[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2008, 29 (3): 27-28, 24.
GUO Ruwen, ZHU Wenlong, GUO Chunhua, et al. Preliminary Study on Seed Dressing by Novel Insecticide (pymertrozine) to Control Rice Stripe Virus at the Seedling State of Seedling Rice and Laodelphax striatellus. [J]. Pesticide Science and Management, 2008, 29(3): 27-28, 24.
[14] 朱玉坤, 郑岩明, 王杰, 等. 喷雾方式及喷液量对吡蚜酮和啶虫脒在棉田的沉积分布及棉蚜防治效果的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2013, 56(5): 530-536.
ZHUYukun, ZHENG Yanming, WANG Jie, et al.Influences of spray method and volume on the deposition of acetamiprid and pymetrozine and their efficacy against cotton aphids in cotton fields [J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2013, 56 (5): 530-536.
[15] Nault BA, Taylor AG, Urwiler M, et al. Neonicotinoid seed treatments for managing potato leafhopper infestations in snap bean [J]. Crop Protection, 2004, 23(2): 147-154.
[16] Elbert A, Haas M, Springer B, et al. Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection [J]. Pest Management Science, 2008, 64(11): 1099-1105.
[17] 党志红, 李耀发, 潘文亮, 等. 吡虫啉拌种防治小麦蚜虫技术及安全性研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011,48(6): 1676-1681.
DANG Zhihong, LI Yaofa, PAN Wenliang, et al. Research on the techniques and safety ofdressing seeds with imidacloprid to control wheat aphids [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2011, 48(6): 1676-1681.
[18] 刘爱芝, 韩松, 梁九进. 新烟碱类杀虫剂拌种防治麦蚜效果及安全性研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2012, 41(12): 94-97, 145.
LIU Aizhi, HAN Song, LIANG Jiujin. Control Effects of Seed Dressing with Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam on Wheat Aphids and Its Safety to Wheat [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 41(12): 94-97, 145.
[19] 安静杰, 孙小诺, 党志红, 等. 2018年冀南棉区棉花伏蚜严重发生的气象因素分析[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019, 39(10): 36-39.
AN Jingjie, SUN Xiaonuo, DANG Zhihong, et al. Influence of Meteorological factors on the Population Dynamics of Summer Type Cotton Aphid in South of Hebei Province in 2018[J]. China Plant Protection, 2019, 39(10): 36-39.
[20] 秦玉川,蔡宁华. 利用‘虫(螨)日’建立时间动态经济受害水平的研究方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 1990, 1(3): 225-230.
QIN Yuchuan, CAI Ninghua. A Research Method of Using ‘insect (or mite) day’ for establishing time dynamic EIL [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1990, 1(3): 225-230.

5种杀虫剂拌种处理对棉花苗蚜的田间防效及安全性评价

Evaluation of the Safety and Control Effects of Five Insecticides Seed Dressing on Cotton Seedling Aphids

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	薛正轩, 蔡志平, 张智健, 彭天祥, 黄志伟, 黄恩泽, 王佩玲, 陆宴辉. 基于铷元素标记技术分析多异瓢虫在甘草带与棉田间的迁移范围[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1741-1747.
[2]	赵斌荣, 田晓曦, 柴军发, 景亮亮, 张红艳, 洪波, 贾彦霞. 西蓝花田桃蚜的室内药剂筛选及田间药效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 547-554.
[3]	李耀发, 安静杰, 窦亚楠, 孙小诺, 张谦, 柳春红, 党志红, 高占林. 播期对黄河流域棉花苗蚜种群动态和棉花产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2496-2500.
[4]	王小丽, 韩睿, 张全成, 赵鹏程, 王俊刚. 不同地理种群棉蚜三种关键性酶活差异及其与抗性相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 2007-2013.
[5]	李艳兵, 郭小虎, 努尔什瓦克·阿达力别克, 帕提玛·乌木尔汗, 马德英. 人工助迁多异瓢虫和化防2种模式对棉蚜的防效及天敌种群动态影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1173-1179.
[6]	陈文静, 赵静, 张金磊, 鲁立良, 冯丽凯. 噻虫嗪在棉叶中残留消解动态及对棉蚜的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1678-1684.
[7]	麻正辉, 苏悦, 马雪, 羊河, 侯国辉, 陈柄润, 韩旭, 姚永生. 噻虫嗪种子包衣棉花对棉蚜和棉长管蚜解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1685-1693.
[8]	张谦, 王燕, 黄山松, 董明, 冯国艺, 王永强, 刘旭, 梁青龙, 林永增, 祁虹, 王树林. 增效剂对常用烟碱类杀虫剂防治棉蚜的减量增效作用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1435-1440.
[9]	安静杰, 高占林, 党志红, 郭江龙, 柳春红, 李耀发. 棉蚜有翅成蚜对不同波段光谱的选择性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1441-1446.
[10]	闫虹江, 李维政, 梁赫, 宁忠雄, 路伟. 3种新烟碱类杀虫剂对棉蚜的室内毒力测定及田间药效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1454-1459.
[11]	王爱玉, 薛超, 杨媛雪, 张芸, 鹿秀云, 赵鸣. 枯草芽孢杆菌对棉花立枯病和黄萎病的防效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2244-2249.
[12]	刘建成, 曾军, 丁峰, 许先查, 窦晶晶, 陈开旭, 李凤鸣, 高雁. 再生固体牛粪垫料中细菌多样性分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2334-2341.
[13]	李娜, 刘冰, 陆宴辉. 氟啶虫胺腈对新疆棉田棉蚜及其天敌种群的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2062-2068.
[14]	刘佳美, 刘冰, 王佩玲, 陆宴辉. 植物源杀虫剂对棉蚜毒力及多异瓢虫的安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2069-2076.
[15]	李志雄, 魏引弟, 苏悦, 陈柄润, 侯国辉, 闻慧, 姚永生, 陈婧. 3种杀虫剂亚致死剂量对棉蚜和棉长管蚜生长与繁殖的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1851-1859.