Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (12): 3067-3077.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.12.022
• Prataculture · Plant Protection · Animal Husbandry Veterinarian • Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Andong1(), ZHANG Guangjie1, FU Rao1, MENG Zhuo1, YAN Yu1, LI Baoguo2, MA Deying1(
)
Received:
2024-04-27
Online:
2024-12-20
Published:
2025-01-16
Correspondence author:
MA Deying
Supported by:
徐安东1(), 张广杰1, 付娆1, 孟卓1, 颜宇1, 李保国2, 马德英1(
)
通讯作者:
马德英
作者简介:
徐安东(1998-),新疆喀什人,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源昆虫及废弃物资源化利用,(E-mail)1625461918@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
XU Andong, ZHANG Guangjie, FU Rao, MENG Zhuo, YAN Yu, LI Baoguo, MA Deying. Optimization of high-efficiency decomposition conditions and transformation parameters of grapevine branches eaten by the Protaetia brevitarsis Lewis[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3067-3077.
徐安东, 张广杰, 付娆, 孟卓, 颜宇, 李保国, 马德英. 白星花金龟取食葡萄枝条的高效腐解条件和转化参数优化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 3067-3077.
腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculant | 主要功能菌 Main functional bacteria | 有效活 菌数 Effective number ofviable bacteria (100 million/g) | 推荐用量 Recomm ended dosage (kg/t) |
---|---|---|---|
RW特配型 (鹤壁人元) | 细菌(枯草、地衣、 胶冻)、丝状菌 和酵母菌 | 100 | 10 |
VT-1000 (北京沃土) | 芽孢、放线、 乳酸和霉菌 | 200 | 1 |
LK (中农绿康) | 芽孢、木霉和酵母 | 8 | 0.5 |
LL(山东绿陇) | 枯草/地衣芽孢杆菌, 酵母、绿色木霉 | 200 | 10 |
EM(日本) | 酵母菌、乳酸菌 | 100 | 10 |
Tab.1 Brief introduction and usage instructions of decomposing bacteria
腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculant | 主要功能菌 Main functional bacteria | 有效活 菌数 Effective number ofviable bacteria (100 million/g) | 推荐用量 Recomm ended dosage (kg/t) |
---|---|---|---|
RW特配型 (鹤壁人元) | 细菌(枯草、地衣、 胶冻)、丝状菌 和酵母菌 | 100 | 10 |
VT-1000 (北京沃土) | 芽孢、放线、 乳酸和霉菌 | 200 | 1 |
LK (中农绿康) | 芽孢、木霉和酵母 | 8 | 0.5 |
LL(山东绿陇) | 枯草/地衣芽孢杆菌, 酵母、绿色木霉 | 200 | 10 |
EM(日本) | 酵母菌、乳酸菌 | 100 | 10 |
水平 Levels | 因素Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculants | 牛粪配比 Manure proportion (%) | 酵化天数 Fermentation days (d) | |
1 | RW | 10 | 10 |
2 | VT | 20 | 15 |
3 | LK | 30 | 20 |
4 | LL | 40 | 25 |
5 | EM | 50 | 30 |
Tab.2 Screening and optimization of excipients and efficient decomposing bacteria in grape branch recycling
水平 Levels | 因素Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculants | 牛粪配比 Manure proportion (%) | 酵化天数 Fermentation days (d) | |
1 | RW | 10 | 10 |
2 | VT | 20 | 15 |
3 | LK | 30 | 20 |
4 | LL | 40 | 25 |
5 | EM | 50 | 30 |
处理 Treatments | 腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculant | 牛粪配比 Manure proportion (%) | 酵化天数 Fermentation days(d) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | RW | 30 | 20 |
2 | RW | 20 | 15 |
3 | VT | 30 | 10 |
4 | LK | 10 | 15 |
5 | LL | 30 | 15 |
6 | LK | 50 | 10 |
7 | LK | 30 | 25 |
8 | LL | 40 | 20 |
9 | EM | 40 | 10 |
10 | VT | 40 | 15 |
11 | LK | 40 | 30 |
12 | LL | 10 | 30 |
13 | EM | 20 | 25 |
14 | EM | 30 | 30 |
15 | VT | 50 | 20 |
16 | EM | 50 | 15 |
17 | RW | 40 | 25 |
18 | RW | 50 | 30 |
19 | RW | 10 | 10 |
20 | LL | 50 | 25 |
21 | EM | 10 | 20 |
22 | VT | 20 | 30 |
23 | LK | 20 | 20 |
24 | LL | 20 | 10 |
25 | VT | 10 | 25 |
Tab.3 Orthogonal experimental design with three factors and five levels
处理 Treatments | 腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculant | 牛粪配比 Manure proportion (%) | 酵化天数 Fermentation days(d) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | RW | 30 | 20 |
2 | RW | 20 | 15 |
3 | VT | 30 | 10 |
4 | LK | 10 | 15 |
5 | LL | 30 | 15 |
6 | LK | 50 | 10 |
7 | LK | 30 | 25 |
8 | LL | 40 | 20 |
9 | EM | 40 | 10 |
10 | VT | 40 | 15 |
11 | LK | 40 | 30 |
12 | LL | 10 | 30 |
13 | EM | 20 | 25 |
14 | EM | 30 | 30 |
15 | VT | 50 | 20 |
16 | EM | 50 | 15 |
17 | RW | 40 | 25 |
18 | RW | 50 | 30 |
19 | RW | 10 | 10 |
20 | LL | 50 | 25 |
21 | EM | 10 | 20 |
22 | VT | 20 | 30 |
23 | LK | 20 | 20 |
24 | LL | 20 | 10 |
25 | VT | 10 | 25 |
处理 Treatments | 因素Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculants | 牛粪配比 Manure proportion (%) | 酵化天数 Fermentation days (d) | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CK1 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
CK2 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
CK3 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
CK4 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
CK5 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
Tab.4 Arrangement of CK experiment
处理 Treatments | 因素Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
腐解菌剂 Decomposition inoculants | 牛粪配比 Manure proportion (%) | 酵化天数 Fermentation days (d) | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CK1 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
CK2 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
CK3 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
CK4 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
CK5 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
因素 和水平 Factor and level | 温度Temperature(℃) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |||||||||
腐解菌剂Decomposing inoculants (A) | |||||||||||||||
RW | 49.18±4.09a | 49.62±2.65a | 53.70±2.28a | 55.40±1.46a | 54.84±2.05a | 45.98±0.96a | 45.08±4.36a | ||||||||
VT | 50.98±2.25a | 53.24±2.44a | 56.04±2.25a | 55.04±1.99a | 55.74±1.25a | 47.58±0.64a | 42.66±3.92a | ||||||||
LK | 49.14±3.90a | 51.62±3.58a | 57.40±1.79a | 53.58±1.92a | 56.1±0.87a | 46.14±1.53a | 38.54±3.92a | ||||||||
LL | 50.92±4.31a | 53.42±3.60a | 54.06±3.15a | 52.08±2.18a | 55.5±0.83a | 47.28±1.69a | 39.84±4.96a | ||||||||
EM | 50.92±3.81a | 54.76±3.13a | 52.90±2.26a | 53.14±1.06a | 52.96±1.4a | 45.64±1.05a | 38.04±4.29a | ||||||||
牛粪配比Manure proportion (B /%) | |||||||||||||||
10 | 53.50±4.46a | 53.18±3.19a | 53.40±2.36ab | 54.46±1.97ab | 54.08±0.74a | 44.36±1.26b | 35.80±4.30b | ||||||||
20 | 49.28±3.78ab | 51.08±4.17a | 53.02±1.76ab | 57.16±2.25a | 55.52±1.08a | 45.32±1.07b | 39.98±5.04b | ||||||||
30 | 55.22±3.15a | 56.86±1.84a | 59.04±0.50a | 51.34±1.63b | 54.86±0.72a | 46.9±0.66ab | 35.02±1.09b | ||||||||
40 | 49.84±1.43ab | 53.08±2.09a | 58.06±1.02a | 52.94±1.00ab | 54.34±1.74a | 47.04±0.9ab | 41.94±3.34ab | ||||||||
50 | 43.30±1.93b | 48.46±2.74a | 50.58±3.02b | 53.34±0.49ab | 56.34±2.14a | 49.00±1.11a | 51.42±1.43a | ||||||||
发酵天数Fermentation days (C /d) | |||||||||||||||
10 | 47.12±1.53a | 51.74±1.82a | 55.26±2.23a | 55.62±1.63a | 55.78±0.45a | 47.18±1.25a | 42.16±2.85a | ||||||||
15 | 53.62±2.95a | 56.50±1.78a | 55.76±2.27a | 50.30±1.22b | 53.58±1.52a | 46.48±1.32a | 37.54±4.03a | ||||||||
20 | 48.32±4.05a | 50.30±3.33a | 54.48±2.12a | 55.76±1.45a | 56.66±1.12a | 46.78±0.47a | 42.70±2.74a | ||||||||
25 | 49.64±4.37a | 50.96±3.96a | 53.86±3.20a | 53.54±1.04ab | 54.52±1.78a | 46.04±1.68a | 40.80±6.15a | ||||||||
30 | 47.12±1.53a | 53.16±3.62a | 54.74±2.56a | 54.02±2.30ab | 54.60±1.53a | 46.14±1.34a | 40.96±5.28a | ||||||||
CK | 52.8 | 54.1 | 52.1 | 50.3 | 52.9 | 43.5 | 34.7 | ||||||||
气温Air temper- ature | 27.50 | 24.50 | 32.50 | 37.50 | 37.00 | 18.50 | 19.50 |
Tab.5 Changes of the different decomposition inoculants, manure proportion, and fermentation days on the temperature change of the material pile
因素 和水平 Factor and level | 温度Temperature(℃) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |||||||||
腐解菌剂Decomposing inoculants (A) | |||||||||||||||
RW | 49.18±4.09a | 49.62±2.65a | 53.70±2.28a | 55.40±1.46a | 54.84±2.05a | 45.98±0.96a | 45.08±4.36a | ||||||||
VT | 50.98±2.25a | 53.24±2.44a | 56.04±2.25a | 55.04±1.99a | 55.74±1.25a | 47.58±0.64a | 42.66±3.92a | ||||||||
LK | 49.14±3.90a | 51.62±3.58a | 57.40±1.79a | 53.58±1.92a | 56.1±0.87a | 46.14±1.53a | 38.54±3.92a | ||||||||
LL | 50.92±4.31a | 53.42±3.60a | 54.06±3.15a | 52.08±2.18a | 55.5±0.83a | 47.28±1.69a | 39.84±4.96a | ||||||||
EM | 50.92±3.81a | 54.76±3.13a | 52.90±2.26a | 53.14±1.06a | 52.96±1.4a | 45.64±1.05a | 38.04±4.29a | ||||||||
牛粪配比Manure proportion (B /%) | |||||||||||||||
10 | 53.50±4.46a | 53.18±3.19a | 53.40±2.36ab | 54.46±1.97ab | 54.08±0.74a | 44.36±1.26b | 35.80±4.30b | ||||||||
20 | 49.28±3.78ab | 51.08±4.17a | 53.02±1.76ab | 57.16±2.25a | 55.52±1.08a | 45.32±1.07b | 39.98±5.04b | ||||||||
30 | 55.22±3.15a | 56.86±1.84a | 59.04±0.50a | 51.34±1.63b | 54.86±0.72a | 46.9±0.66ab | 35.02±1.09b | ||||||||
40 | 49.84±1.43ab | 53.08±2.09a | 58.06±1.02a | 52.94±1.00ab | 54.34±1.74a | 47.04±0.9ab | 41.94±3.34ab | ||||||||
50 | 43.30±1.93b | 48.46±2.74a | 50.58±3.02b | 53.34±0.49ab | 56.34±2.14a | 49.00±1.11a | 51.42±1.43a | ||||||||
发酵天数Fermentation days (C /d) | |||||||||||||||
10 | 47.12±1.53a | 51.74±1.82a | 55.26±2.23a | 55.62±1.63a | 55.78±0.45a | 47.18±1.25a | 42.16±2.85a | ||||||||
15 | 53.62±2.95a | 56.50±1.78a | 55.76±2.27a | 50.30±1.22b | 53.58±1.52a | 46.48±1.32a | 37.54±4.03a | ||||||||
20 | 48.32±4.05a | 50.30±3.33a | 54.48±2.12a | 55.76±1.45a | 56.66±1.12a | 46.78±0.47a | 42.70±2.74a | ||||||||
25 | 49.64±4.37a | 50.96±3.96a | 53.86±3.20a | 53.54±1.04ab | 54.52±1.78a | 46.04±1.68a | 40.80±6.15a | ||||||||
30 | 47.12±1.53a | 53.16±3.62a | 54.74±2.56a | 54.02±2.30ab | 54.60±1.53a | 46.14±1.34a | 40.96±5.28a | ||||||||
CK | 52.8 | 54.1 | 52.1 | 50.3 | 52.9 | 43.5 | 34.7 | ||||||||
气温Air temper- ature | 27.50 | 24.50 | 32.50 | 37.50 | 37.00 | 18.50 | 19.50 |
因素和水平 Factor and level | 取食量 Food intake (g) | 增重量 Larvae weight gain(g) | 虫砂量 Dung-sand weight(g) | 饲料利用率 Feed utilization rate(%) | 虫砂转化率 Dung-sand conversion rate(%) | 虫体转化率 Insect transformation rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
腐解菌剂Decomposing inoculants (A) | ||||||
RW | 85.24±5.40a | 7.54±1.03a | 67.23±4.98b | 47.56±0.03a | 84.98±0.02b | 43.21±0.07c |
VT | 86.79±4.01a | 6.59±0.71a | 74.20±4.97a | 46.51±0.02a | 91.58±0.02a | 85.56±0.2ab |
LK | 75.34±4.06b | 6.77±0.85a | 63.17±3.62c | 40.98±0.02b | 91.74±0.02a | 79.71±0.24a |
LL | 72.93±7.67b | 6.97±1.10a | 63.82±7.05c | 39.58±0.04b | 92.59±0.02a | 76.56±0.11ab |
EM | 72.97±4.37b | 6.33±0.52a | 61.84±4.37c | 39.47±0.02b | 92.41±0.02a | 68.24±0.07b |
牛粪配比Manure proportion (B /%) | ||||||
10 | 47.79±3.24e | 3.27±0.59c | 38.43±2.65e | 25.59±0.02e | 86.45±0.02c | 38.25±0.07c |
20 | 59.15±3.87d | 4.05±0.54c | 43.32±2.99d | 32.84±0.02d | 78.94±0.01b | 23.29±0.03c |
30 | 80.38±1.53c | 7.30±0.52b | 67.64±1.80c | 43.98±0.01c | 93.21±0.02b | 56.20±0.28a |
40 | 97.69±3.18b | 9.53±0.86a | 84.59±2.41b | 53.51±0.02b | 96.54±0.01a | 86.25±0.08b |
50 | 105.97±2.91a | 10.09±0.84a | 94.07±2.56a | 57.48±0.02a | 98.68±0.01a | 78.65±0.14a |
发酵天数Fermentation days (C /d) | ||||||
10 | 57.36±4.44c | 2.77±0.36d | 47.35±22.54c | 30.39±0.02d | 83.45±0.02c | 35.58±0.07c |
15 | 78.64±4.73b | 5.69±0.65c | 68.13±23.08b | 42.84±0.03c | 92.47±0.02ab | 65.22±0.10bc |
20 | 80.36±5.15b | 7.21±0.67b | 68.60±27.21b | 43.84±0.03bc | 92.15±0.02ab | 89.41±0.16b |
25 | 92.25±4.36a | 11.14±0.64a | 77.53±22.43a | 50.64±0.02a | 95.65±0.02a | 94.65±0.27a |
30 | 82.38±5.57b | 7.42±1.02b | 66.44±22.44b | 45.69±0.03b | 88.29±0.01b | 85.99±0.07c |
Tab.6 Changes of the different decomposing inoculants, manure proportion and fermentation days on the transformation capability of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis
因素和水平 Factor and level | 取食量 Food intake (g) | 增重量 Larvae weight gain(g) | 虫砂量 Dung-sand weight(g) | 饲料利用率 Feed utilization rate(%) | 虫砂转化率 Dung-sand conversion rate(%) | 虫体转化率 Insect transformation rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
腐解菌剂Decomposing inoculants (A) | ||||||
RW | 85.24±5.40a | 7.54±1.03a | 67.23±4.98b | 47.56±0.03a | 84.98±0.02b | 43.21±0.07c |
VT | 86.79±4.01a | 6.59±0.71a | 74.20±4.97a | 46.51±0.02a | 91.58±0.02a | 85.56±0.2ab |
LK | 75.34±4.06b | 6.77±0.85a | 63.17±3.62c | 40.98±0.02b | 91.74±0.02a | 79.71±0.24a |
LL | 72.93±7.67b | 6.97±1.10a | 63.82±7.05c | 39.58±0.04b | 92.59±0.02a | 76.56±0.11ab |
EM | 72.97±4.37b | 6.33±0.52a | 61.84±4.37c | 39.47±0.02b | 92.41±0.02a | 68.24±0.07b |
牛粪配比Manure proportion (B /%) | ||||||
10 | 47.79±3.24e | 3.27±0.59c | 38.43±2.65e | 25.59±0.02e | 86.45±0.02c | 38.25±0.07c |
20 | 59.15±3.87d | 4.05±0.54c | 43.32±2.99d | 32.84±0.02d | 78.94±0.01b | 23.29±0.03c |
30 | 80.38±1.53c | 7.30±0.52b | 67.64±1.80c | 43.98±0.01c | 93.21±0.02b | 56.20±0.28a |
40 | 97.69±3.18b | 9.53±0.86a | 84.59±2.41b | 53.51±0.02b | 96.54±0.01a | 86.25±0.08b |
50 | 105.97±2.91a | 10.09±0.84a | 94.07±2.56a | 57.48±0.02a | 98.68±0.01a | 78.65±0.14a |
发酵天数Fermentation days (C /d) | ||||||
10 | 57.36±4.44c | 2.77±0.36d | 47.35±22.54c | 30.39±0.02d | 83.45±0.02c | 35.58±0.07c |
15 | 78.64±4.73b | 5.69±0.65c | 68.13±23.08b | 42.84±0.03c | 92.47±0.02ab | 65.22±0.10bc |
20 | 80.36±5.15b | 7.21±0.67b | 68.60±27.21b | 43.84±0.03bc | 92.15±0.02ab | 89.41±0.16b |
25 | 92.25±4.36a | 11.14±0.64a | 77.53±22.43a | 50.64±0.02a | 95.65±0.02a | 94.65±0.27a |
30 | 82.38±5.57b | 7.42±1.02b | 66.44±22.44b | 45.69±0.03b | 88.29±0.01b | 85.99±0.07c |
发酵天数 Days of fermentation (d) | 取食量 Food intake (g) | 增重量 Larvae weight gain (g) | 虫砂量 Dung-sand weight (g) | 饲料利用率 Feed utilization rate (%) | 虫砂转化率 Dung-sand conversion rate (%) | 虫体转化率 Insect transformation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 16.33±0.17b | 0.28±0.17b | 7.26±0.17d | 8.61±0.17d | 49.44±0.17c | 4.03±0.17d |
10 | 27.51±0.46b | 1.42±0.46b | 20.84±0.46bc | 26.21±0.59a | 98.01±0.59a | 30.52±0.59bc |
15 | 29.53±0.07b | 0.2±0.07b | 14.94±0.07c | 16.08±0.07b | 52.63±0.07c | 1.58±0.07bc |
20 | 26.29±0.04b | 0.49±0.04b | 17.85±0.04bc | 13.76±0.04bc | 70.28±0.04bc | 37.16±0.04a |
25 | 51.38±0.59a | 2.96±0.59a | 47.49±0.59a | 14.35±0.46bc | 84.30±0.46ab | 34.57±0.46b |
30 | 29.39±0.33c | 1.49±0.33b | 22.61±0.33b | 15.21±0.33bc | 81.07±0.33ab | 22.22±0.33b |
Tab.7 Transformation capability of the 3rd instar larvae of Protaetia brevitarsis to the different fermentation days of the vine of grape
发酵天数 Days of fermentation (d) | 取食量 Food intake (g) | 增重量 Larvae weight gain (g) | 虫砂量 Dung-sand weight (g) | 饲料利用率 Feed utilization rate (%) | 虫砂转化率 Dung-sand conversion rate (%) | 虫体转化率 Insect transformation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 16.33±0.17b | 0.28±0.17b | 7.26±0.17d | 8.61±0.17d | 49.44±0.17c | 4.03±0.17d |
10 | 27.51±0.46b | 1.42±0.46b | 20.84±0.46bc | 26.21±0.59a | 98.01±0.59a | 30.52±0.59bc |
15 | 29.53±0.07b | 0.2±0.07b | 14.94±0.07c | 16.08±0.07b | 52.63±0.07c | 1.58±0.07bc |
20 | 26.29±0.04b | 0.49±0.04b | 17.85±0.04bc | 13.76±0.04bc | 70.28±0.04bc | 37.16±0.04a |
25 | 51.38±0.59a | 2.96±0.59a | 47.49±0.59a | 14.35±0.46bc | 84.30±0.46ab | 34.57±0.46b |
30 | 29.39±0.33c | 1.49±0.33b | 22.61±0.33b | 15.21±0.33bc | 81.07±0.33ab | 22.22±0.33b |
源 Source | 因变量 Dependent Variable | III型平方和 Type III Sum of Squares | 自由度Df | 均方 Mean Square | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
校正模型 Corrected Model | 虫增重 | 1 991.087a | 24 | 82.962 | 21.408 | 0.000 |
取食量 | 86 925.924b | 24 | 3 621.913 | 177.448 | 0.000 | |
虫体转化率 | 74.440c | 24 | 3.102 | 37.180 | 0.000 | |
虫砂转化率 | 1.306d | 24 | 0.054 | 25.291 | 0.000 | |
虫砂收获系数 | 2.237e | 24 | 0.093 | 188.099 | 0.000 | |
有机物料利用率 | 2.642f | 24 | 0.110 | 136.278 | 0.000 | |
虫砂量 | 77 401.852g | 24 | 3 225.077 | 181.767 | 0.000 | |
牛粪配比 Manure proportion | 虫增重 | 13.202 | 1 | 13.202 | 3.407 | 0.068 |
取食量 | 0.112 | 1 | 0.112 | 0.006 | 0.941 | |
虫体转化率 | 26.073 | 1 | 26.073 | 312.537 | 0.000 | |
虫砂转化率 | 0.110 | 1 | 0.110 | 51.183 | 0.000 | |
虫砂收获系数 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.004 | 8.924 | 0.004 | |
有机物料利用率 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.002 | 2.086 | 0.152 | |
虫砂量 | 394.258 | 1 | 394.258 | 22.221 | 0.000 | |
发酵天数 Fermentation days | 虫增重 | 140.625 | 1 | 140.625 | 36.288 | 0.000 |
取食量 | 3 979.227 | 1 | 3 979.227 | 194.953 | 0.000 | |
虫体转化率 | 0.479 | 1 | 0.479 | 5.745 | 0.018 | |
虫砂转化率 | 0.007 | 1 | 0.007 | 3.204 | 0.076 | |
虫砂收获系数 | 0.078 | 1 | 0.078 | 158.128 | 0.000 | |
有机物料利用率 | 0.127 | 1 | 0.127 | 157.525 | 0.000 | |
虫砂量 | 2 441.719 | 1 | 2 441.719 | 137.616 | 0.000 | |
误差 Error | 虫增重 | 387.521 | 100 | 3.875 | ||
取食量 | 2 041.116 | 100 | 20.411 | |||
虫体转化率 | 8.342 | 100 | 0.083 | |||
虫砂转化率 | 0.215 | 100 | 0.002 | |||
虫砂收获系数 | 0.050 | 100 | 0.000 | |||
有机物料利用率 | 0.081 | 100 | 0.001 | |||
虫砂量 | 1 774.293 | 100 | 17.743 | |||
校正总计 Corrected total | 虫增重 | 2 378.609 | 124 | |||
取食量 | 88 967.040 | 124 | ||||
虫体转化率 | 82.782 | 124 | ||||
虫砂转化率 | 1.521 | 124 | ||||
虫砂收获系数 | 2.287 | 124 | ||||
有机物料利用率 | 2.723 | 124 | ||||
虫砂量 | 79 176.145 | 124 | ||||
a.R2 = 0.837(调整R2 = 0.798);b.R2 = 0.977(调整R2 = 0.972) c.R2 = 0.899(调整R2 = 0.875);d.R2 = 0.859(调整R2 = 0.825) e.R2 = 0.978(调整R2 = 0.973);f.R2 = 0.970(调整R2 = 0.963) g.R2 = 0.978(调整R2 = 0.972) |
Tab.8 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
源 Source | 因变量 Dependent Variable | III型平方和 Type III Sum of Squares | 自由度Df | 均方 Mean Square | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
校正模型 Corrected Model | 虫增重 | 1 991.087a | 24 | 82.962 | 21.408 | 0.000 |
取食量 | 86 925.924b | 24 | 3 621.913 | 177.448 | 0.000 | |
虫体转化率 | 74.440c | 24 | 3.102 | 37.180 | 0.000 | |
虫砂转化率 | 1.306d | 24 | 0.054 | 25.291 | 0.000 | |
虫砂收获系数 | 2.237e | 24 | 0.093 | 188.099 | 0.000 | |
有机物料利用率 | 2.642f | 24 | 0.110 | 136.278 | 0.000 | |
虫砂量 | 77 401.852g | 24 | 3 225.077 | 181.767 | 0.000 | |
牛粪配比 Manure proportion | 虫增重 | 13.202 | 1 | 13.202 | 3.407 | 0.068 |
取食量 | 0.112 | 1 | 0.112 | 0.006 | 0.941 | |
虫体转化率 | 26.073 | 1 | 26.073 | 312.537 | 0.000 | |
虫砂转化率 | 0.110 | 1 | 0.110 | 51.183 | 0.000 | |
虫砂收获系数 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.004 | 8.924 | 0.004 | |
有机物料利用率 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.002 | 2.086 | 0.152 | |
虫砂量 | 394.258 | 1 | 394.258 | 22.221 | 0.000 | |
发酵天数 Fermentation days | 虫增重 | 140.625 | 1 | 140.625 | 36.288 | 0.000 |
取食量 | 3 979.227 | 1 | 3 979.227 | 194.953 | 0.000 | |
虫体转化率 | 0.479 | 1 | 0.479 | 5.745 | 0.018 | |
虫砂转化率 | 0.007 | 1 | 0.007 | 3.204 | 0.076 | |
虫砂收获系数 | 0.078 | 1 | 0.078 | 158.128 | 0.000 | |
有机物料利用率 | 0.127 | 1 | 0.127 | 157.525 | 0.000 | |
虫砂量 | 2 441.719 | 1 | 2 441.719 | 137.616 | 0.000 | |
误差 Error | 虫增重 | 387.521 | 100 | 3.875 | ||
取食量 | 2 041.116 | 100 | 20.411 | |||
虫体转化率 | 8.342 | 100 | 0.083 | |||
虫砂转化率 | 0.215 | 100 | 0.002 | |||
虫砂收获系数 | 0.050 | 100 | 0.000 | |||
有机物料利用率 | 0.081 | 100 | 0.001 | |||
虫砂量 | 1 774.293 | 100 | 17.743 | |||
校正总计 Corrected total | 虫增重 | 2 378.609 | 124 | |||
取食量 | 88 967.040 | 124 | ||||
虫体转化率 | 82.782 | 124 | ||||
虫砂转化率 | 1.521 | 124 | ||||
虫砂收获系数 | 2.287 | 124 | ||||
有机物料利用率 | 2.723 | 124 | ||||
虫砂量 | 79 176.145 | 124 | ||||
a.R2 = 0.837(调整R2 = 0.798);b.R2 = 0.977(调整R2 = 0.972) c.R2 = 0.899(调整R2 = 0.875);d.R2 = 0.859(调整R2 = 0.825) e.R2 = 0.978(调整R2 = 0.973);f.R2 = 0.970(调整R2 = 0.963) g.R2 = 0.978(调整R2 = 0.972) |
Fig.2 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow manure ratio and fermentation days on the weight gain of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis Notes: Tukey's multiple range test analysis shows that the difference between the same factors without the same letter is significant (P < 0.05,n=4), the same as below
Fig.3 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow dung ratio and fermentation days on the feeding amount of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis
Fig.4 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow manure ratio and fermentation days on the transformation rate of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis
Fig.5 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow dung ratio and fermentation days on the conversion rate of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis insect sand
Fig 6 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow manure ratio and fermentation days on the harvest coefficient of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis insect sand
Fig.7 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow dung ratio and fermentation days on the utilization rate of organic materials in the 3rd instant larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis
Fig.8 Changes of different decomposition inoculants, cow dung ratio and fermentation days on the insect sand amount of the 3rd instar larvae of P.brevitarsis Lewis residual film
[1] | 满保德. 新疆吐鲁番地区葡萄产业发展对策研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2017. |
MAN Baode. Research on the development strategy of grape industry in Turpan, Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2017. | |
[2] | 雷天翔, 施维新, 宋敏, 等. 新疆生产建设兵团葡萄产业发展问题与对策[J]. 中国果树, 2023,(9): 117-121. |
LEI Tianxiang, SHI Weixin, SONG Min, et al. Problems and countermeasures for the development of grape industry in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps[J]. China Fruits, 2023,(9): 117-121. | |
[3] | 杨明昊, 张艺灿, 王孝娣, 等. 葡萄枝条堆肥对设施栽培葡萄园土壤和87-1葡萄生长发育的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2023(4): 78-81, 86. |
YANG Minghao, ZHANG Yican, WANG Xiaodi, et al. Effects of grape branch compost on soil and ‘87-1’ grape growth in protected cultivation vineyard[J]. China Fruits, 2023(4): 78-81, 86. | |
[4] | 刘文政, 平凤姣, 白雪冰, 等. 葡萄枝条资源化利用研究现状及进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(16): 270-283. |
LIU Wenzheng, PING Fengjiao, BAI Xuebing, et al. Status and prospect of resource utilization for grape vine stalks[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(16): 270-283. | |
[5] | 张广杰. 虫菌复合技术转化棉秆还田对棉花生长发育及黄萎病发生的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022. |
ZHANG Guangjie. Effects of conversion of cotton stalk to field by insect-bacteria composite Technology on cotton growth and development and occurrence of verticillium wilt[D] Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022. | |
[6] | 刘玉升, 骆洪义, 叶保华. 餐厨废弃物的环境昆虫处理途径及资源化利用探讨[J]. 再生资源与循环经济, 2013, 6(4): 35-37. |
LIU Yusheng, LUO Hongyi, YE Baohua. The treatment and utilization approach of kitchen waste by environmental insects[J]. Recyclable Resources and Circular Economy, 2013, 6(4): 35-37. | |
[7] | 周婷, 赵威, 赵传岳, 等. 灵芝菌糠对白星花金龟幼虫生长性能的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(6): 868-873. |
ZHOU Ting, ZHAO Wei, ZHAO Chuanyue, et al. Effects of the spent substrate of ganodorma lucidum on the growth performance of Protaetia brevitarsis lewis larvae[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 53(6): 868-873. | |
[8] | 张广杰. 白星花金龟对有机废弃物的转化技术研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019. |
ZHANG Guangjie. Research on the conversion technology of organic waste by Protaetia brevitarsis[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[9] | 张广杰, 王倩, 刘玉升. 白星花金龟人为条件生物学与应用潜力[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(2): 257-266. |
ZHANG Guangjie, WANG Qian, LIU Yusheng. Biology under artificial condition and utilization potential of Potosia brevitarsis (Coleoptera: Cetoniidea)[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(2): 257-266. | |
[10] | 秦铭潞. 白星花金龟幼虫蛋白的提取、分离纯化及抗炎性研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020. |
QIN Minglu. Study on extraction, isolation and purification of protein from larva of the Protaetia brevitarsis and its anti-inflammatory[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[11] | 史长旭, 张广杰, 徐业山, 等. 白星花金龟虫粪砂混配基质对黄瓜和辣椒育苗效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2021, 44(6): 443-447. |
SHI Changxu, ZHANG Guangjie, XU Yeshan, et al. Effects of Protaetia brevitarsis lewis larvae dung-sand mixture matrix on cucumber and pepper seedling[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021, 44(6): 443-447. | |
[12] |
Yoon H S, Lee C S, Lee S Y, et al. Purification and cDNA cloning of inducible antibacterial peptides from Protaetia brevitarsis (Coleoptera)[J]. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2003, 52(2): 92-103.
PMID |
[13] |
Lee D G, Park J H, Shin S Y, et al. Design of novel analogue peptides with potent fungicidal but low hemolytic activity based on the cecropin A-melittin hybrid structure[J]. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International, 1997, 43(3): 489-498.
PMID |
[14] | 杨诚, 刘玉升, 徐晓燕, 等. 白星花金龟幼虫资源成分分析及评价[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(2): 166-170. |
YANG Cheng, LIU Yusheng, XU Xiaoyan, et al. Analysis and evaluation of resource components of Protaetia brevitarsis(lewis) larvae[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 45(2): 166-170. | |
[15] |
Li Y M, Fu T, Geng L L, et al. Protaetia brevitarsis larvae can efficiently convert herbaceous and ligneous plant residues to humic acids[J]. Waste Management, 2019, 83: 79-82.
DOI PMID |
[16] | Manning P, Slade E M, Beynon S A, et al. Functionally rich dung beetle assemblages are required to provide multiple ecosystem services[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 218: 87-94. |
[17] | 刘玉升, 张大鹏. 基于白星花金龟幼虫转化玉米秸秆的微循环农牧场模式研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(31): 85-87. |
LIU Yusheng, ZHANG Dapeng. Study on the model of microcirculation farm and ranch on the corn straw transformed by larval of Potosia brevitarsis lewis[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(31): 85-87. | |
[18] | Zhang G J, Xu Y S, Zhang S, et al. Transformation capability optimization and product application potential of proteatia brevitarsis (Coleoptera: Cetoniidae) larvae on cotton stalks[J]. Insects, 2022, 13(12): 1083. |
[19] | 何笙, 周泽容, 吴赵平, 等. 白星花金龟发生与防治技术研究初报[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(6): 314-316. |
HE Sheng, ZHOU Zerong, WU Zhaoping, et al. A study on the occurrence of postosia brevitarsis leiwis and its prevention & control technology[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(6): 314-316.
DOI |
|
[20] | 王佳男. 基于白星花金龟幼虫活体筛选高致病力白僵菌菌株[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019. |
WANG Jianan. Screening of high-virulence strains of Beauveria bassiana based on Protaetia brevitarsis larvae[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[21] | 郭勇. 郓城县农业有机废弃物资源调查和环保昆虫转化处理模式探究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020. |
GUO Yong. Yuncheng County Investigation of agricultural organic waste resour-ces and exploration of Environmental protection insect transformation treatment model[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[22] | 张倩. 取食平菇菌糠的白星花金龟生物学研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015. |
ZHANG Qian. Biological study of Protaetia brevitarsis feeding on oyster mush-room bran[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. | |
[23] | 孙晨可. “小麦秸秆—大球盖菇—白星花金龟” 循环模式研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018. |
SUN Chenke. Study on the cycle pattern of "wheat straw - large ball mushroom - Protaetia brevitarsis"[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[24] |
Gossner M M, Lachat T, Brunet J, et al. Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests[J]. Conservation Biology, 2013, 27(3): 605-614.
DOI PMID |
[25] | Zhang X F, Wang L Y, Liu C Q, et al. Identification and field verification of an aggregation pheromone from the white-spotted flower chafer, Protaetia brevitarsis lewis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 22362. |
[26] | 徐业山. 虫菌复合技术分离棉田残膜回收混合物研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022. |
XU Yeshan. Study on separation of residue film recovery mixture from cotton field by insect-bacteria composite technology[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022. |
[1] | ZHAI Yawei, CHEN Hongjin, SUN Hongtao, CHEN Shuaikang, LIU Chuli, MA Rong. Study on pathogenicity of Cytospora on Poplus and Salix in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1227-1235. |
[2] | LI Feng, LAI Ganggang, ZHAO Zhihui, CHEN Xiaofei, ZHU Tiansheng. Identification and 16S rRNA gene diversity analysis of salt cedar(Tamarix chinensis)witches'-broom [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2551-2557. |
[3] | LI Jingxia, ZHANG Xuexiang, LI Feng, MA Sijie, ZHANG Ping, ZHU Tiansheng. Prediction of suitable areas and quantitative risk analysis of willow phytoplasma diseases in China based on MaxEnt model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1235-1243. |
[4] | HAN Sheng, GAO Qiang, XIANG Tao, XU Lin, REN Hailong, YAN Qingqing, Yushanjiang Maimaiti, ZHANG Yan, LI Wenghui. Isolation and Identification of Pathogens Causing Rust Disease on Taraxacumkok-saghyz Rodin in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1231-1235. |
[5] | LI Fan, REN Yuzhong, JIAO Ruilian, SUN Lin, LI Guoying. Identification of the Pathogen Causing Leaf Spot of Dianthus chinensis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(4): 712-719. |
[6] | YANG Anpei, ZHANG Hang, BAI Weiwei, GAO Haifeng, LI Guangkuo, WANG Suolao. Selection Preference and Population Fitness of Scotogramma trifolii to Different Host Plants [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(3): 528-535. |
[7] | FU Yuan-yuan1, JIANG Ping1, LIU Ai-hua2 , ZHANG Jing-wen2, YUE Zhao-yuan2, TIAN Cheng-ming. Analysis of the Influence of Different Landscape Scales on the Spatial Distribution of Diaspidiotusslavonicus's Population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2043-2053. |
[8] | GU Mei-ying1, XU Wan-li2, ZHANG Zhi-dong1, TANG Guang-mu2, TANG Qi-yong1, GU Yu-zhong3, SONG Su-qin1, Gulinisha Shayimu1, YANG Bo4, FENG Lei2. Analysis of Soil Microbial Diversity in Root Zone of Walnut Orchard with Different Levels of Rot Disease [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(6): 1107-1116. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||