

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 1249-1257.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.05.023
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Jiaxuan1(
), LI Xueping2, LI Xiao3, XU Shiyang2, LI Jianjun2, YANG Chengde1, MENG Huan1, QI Yonghong1(
)
Received:2024-10-13
Online:2025-05-20
Published:2025-07-09
Correspondence author:
QI Yonghong
Supported by:
马佳璇1(
), 李雪萍2, 李潇3, 许世洋2, 李建军2, 杨成德1, 孟欢1, 漆永红1(
)
通讯作者:
漆永红
作者简介:马佳璇(2001-),女,兰州西固人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物病理学及病害防控,(E-mail) 2092738762@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
MA Jiaxuan, LI Xueping, LI Xiao, XU Shiyang, LI Jianjun, YANG Chengde, MENG Huan, QI Yonghong. Laboratory screening of tomato resistant varieties and control fungicides against tomato Fusarium solani root rot caused by Fusarium solani[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(5): 1249-1257.
马佳璇, 李雪萍, 李潇, 许世洋, 李建军, 杨成德, 孟欢, 漆永红. 番茄茄镰孢根腐病抗性品种鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(5): 1249-1257.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.05.023
| 品种抗性分级 Varietal resistance classification | 病情指数(DI) Disease index |
|---|---|
| 免疫 Immunity(I) | DI= 0 |
| 抗病 Resistance(R) | 0 < DI≤ 20 |
| 中抗 Middle resistance(MR) | 20 < DI≤ 30 |
| 中感 Middle susceptibility(MS) | 30 < DI≤ 40 |
| 感病 Susceptibility(S) | 40 < DI≤ 60 |
| 高感 High Susceptibility(HS) | DI> 60 |
Tab.1 Classification standard for varietal resistance of tomato root rot caused by Fusarium solani
| 品种抗性分级 Varietal resistance classification | 病情指数(DI) Disease index |
|---|---|
| 免疫 Immunity(I) | DI= 0 |
| 抗病 Resistance(R) | 0 < DI≤ 20 |
| 中抗 Middle resistance(MR) | 20 < DI≤ 30 |
| 中感 Middle susceptibility(MS) | 30 < DI≤ 40 |
| 感病 Susceptibility(S) | 40 < DI≤ 60 |
| 高感 High Susceptibility(HS) | DI> 60 |
| 处理Treatments | 稀释倍数 Dilution ratio & 药剂浓度 Fungicide concentration(μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80%多菌灵可湿性粉剂 80% carbendazim WP | 1 000 & 800.00(1) | 2 000 & 400.00 | 4 000 & 200.00 | 6 000 & 133.33 | 8 000 & 100.00 |
| 70%烯酰·嘧菌酯水分散粒剂 70% enoyl azoxystrobin WG | 1 000 & 200.00(1) | 2 000 & 100.00 | 3 000 & 66.67 | 4 000 & 50.00 | 5 000 & 40.00 |
| 60%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂 60% phenoxymeclozole WG | 1 000 & 600.00(1) | 2 000 & 300.00 | 3 000 & 200.00 | 4 000 & 150.00 | 5 000 & 120.00 |
| 30%噻森铜·戊唑醇悬浮剂 30% thiazenol copper pentazolol SC | 500 & 200.00(1) | 1 000 & 100.00 | 1 500 & 66.67 | 2 000 & 50.00 | 2 500 & 40.00 |
| 15%三唑酮可湿性粉剂 15% triazolone WP | 1 000 & 150.00(1) | 2 000 & 75.00 | 3 000 & 50.00 | 4 000 & 37.50 | 5 000 & 30.00 |
| 58%甲霜灵·代森锰锌可湿性粉剂 58% metalaxyl-mancozeb WP | 500 & 1160.00(1) | 1 000 & 580.00 | 1 500 & 386.67 | 2 000 & 290.00 | 2 500 & 232.00 |
| 12.5%烯唑醇可湿性粉剂 12.5% diniconazole WP | 1 000 & 125.00(1) | 2 000 & 62.50 | 3 000 & 41.67 | 4 000 & 31.25 | 5 000 & 25.00 |
| CK | - | - | - | - | - |
Tab.2 Dilution ratios and concentrations of different fungicides
| 处理Treatments | 稀释倍数 Dilution ratio & 药剂浓度 Fungicide concentration(μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80%多菌灵可湿性粉剂 80% carbendazim WP | 1 000 & 800.00(1) | 2 000 & 400.00 | 4 000 & 200.00 | 6 000 & 133.33 | 8 000 & 100.00 |
| 70%烯酰·嘧菌酯水分散粒剂 70% enoyl azoxystrobin WG | 1 000 & 200.00(1) | 2 000 & 100.00 | 3 000 & 66.67 | 4 000 & 50.00 | 5 000 & 40.00 |
| 60%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂 60% phenoxymeclozole WG | 1 000 & 600.00(1) | 2 000 & 300.00 | 3 000 & 200.00 | 4 000 & 150.00 | 5 000 & 120.00 |
| 30%噻森铜·戊唑醇悬浮剂 30% thiazenol copper pentazolol SC | 500 & 200.00(1) | 1 000 & 100.00 | 1 500 & 66.67 | 2 000 & 50.00 | 2 500 & 40.00 |
| 15%三唑酮可湿性粉剂 15% triazolone WP | 1 000 & 150.00(1) | 2 000 & 75.00 | 3 000 & 50.00 | 4 000 & 37.50 | 5 000 & 30.00 |
| 58%甲霜灵·代森锰锌可湿性粉剂 58% metalaxyl-mancozeb WP | 500 & 1160.00(1) | 1 000 & 580.00 | 1 500 & 386.67 | 2 000 & 290.00 | 2 500 & 232.00 |
| 12.5%烯唑醇可湿性粉剂 12.5% diniconazole WP | 1 000 & 125.00(1) | 2 000 & 62.50 | 3 000 & 41.67 | 4 000 & 31.25 | 5 000 & 25.00 |
| CK | - | - | - | - | - |
| 品种 Varieties | 发病率 Incidence (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗性分级 Resistance classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 元明红玉女 Yuanminghongyunv | 27.77±5.53i | 9.70±1.40k | R |
| 台湾粉玉女 Taiwanfenyunv | 27.77±5.53i | 13.90±1.40k | R |
| 魔鬼樱桃 Moguiyingtao | 38.90±11.10ghi | 20.83±6.38jk | MR |
| 粉冠1号 Fenguan 1 | 44.43±11.13fghi | 22.23±3.68ijk | MR |
| 精品红美女 Jingpinhongmeinv | 55.57±5.56efgh | 23.63±3.67hijk | MR |
| 元明粉玉女 Yuanmingfenyunv | 55.57±5.57efgh | 31.97±5.02ghij | MS |
| 粉果番茄 Fenguofanqie | 61.13±5.57defg | 33.33±4.82ghij | MS |
| 贼不偷绿宝石 Zeibutoulvbaoshi | 55.57±5.57efgh | 34.70±1.40fghij | MS |
| 花绣球 Huaxiuqiu | 66.70±0.00cdef | 34.73±3.68fghij | MS |
| 精品威尼斯 Jingpinweinisi | 61.13±5.57defg | 34.73±5.02fghij | MS |
| 红玉189 Hongyu 189 | 55.57±5.57efgh | 34.73±7.72fghij | MS |
| 粉圣果 Fenshengguo | 66.67±9.61cdef | 36.10±6.04fghij | MS |
| 黄色樱桃 Huangseyingtao | 61.13±5.57defg | 37.50±6.36fghij | MS |
| 大黄金丽 Dahuangjinli | 66.67±9.61cdef | 38.90±2.80efghi | MS |
| 美味樱桃 Meiweiyingtao | 72.23±5.53bcde | 38.90±4.99efghi | MS |
| 黄圆小番茄 Huangyuanxiaofanqie | 66.67±9.61cdef | 38.90±6.05efghi | MS |
| F199 | 72.23±5.53bcde | 40.27±3.68efgh | S |
| 奇欧佳美 Qioujiamei | 72.23±5.53bcde | 43.07±3.67efg | S |
| 黄洋梨 Huangyangli | 77.77±5.53abcde | 44.43±6.07defg | S |
| 红五彩 Hongwucai | 77.80±11.10abcde | 44.43±9.11defg | S |
| 法国红瑞娜 Faguohongruina | 77.77±5.53abcde | 44.47±9.71defg | S |
| 中蔬4号 Zhongshu 4 | 77.77±5.53abcde | 45.83±2.39cdefg | S |
| 绿宝石 Lvbaoshi | 72.23±5.53bcde | 45.83±8.67cdefg | S |
| 富丽 Fuli | 77.77±5.53abcde | 47.23±5.02cdefg | S |
| 金童F1 Jintong F1 | 77.77±5.53abcde | 48.60±2.80cdefg | S |
| 元明黄娇子 Yuanminghuangjiaozi | 83.33±9.61abcd | 52.80±6.04bcdef | S |
| 红色樱桃 Hongseyingtao | 83.33±9.61abcd | 52.80±7.35bcdef | S |
| 改良春桃 Gailiangchuntao | 88.87±5.57abc | 55.57±3.67abcde | S |
| 紫五彩 Ziwucai | 88.87±5.57abc | 61.13±3.67abcd | HS |
| 托托斯加 Tuotuosijia | 94.43±5.57ab | 62.50±6.36abc | HS |
| 紫圣果 Zishengguo | 100.00±0.00a | 63.87±3.67ab | HS |
| 迷你紫圣果 Minizishengguo | 100.00±0.00a | 63.90±1.40ab | HS |
| 千禧圣女果 Qianxishengnvguo | 94.43±5.57ab | 65.27±2.77a | HS |
Tab.3 The incidence and disease index of different tomato varieties of Fusarium solani
| 品种 Varieties | 发病率 Incidence (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗性分级 Resistance classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 元明红玉女 Yuanminghongyunv | 27.77±5.53i | 9.70±1.40k | R |
| 台湾粉玉女 Taiwanfenyunv | 27.77±5.53i | 13.90±1.40k | R |
| 魔鬼樱桃 Moguiyingtao | 38.90±11.10ghi | 20.83±6.38jk | MR |
| 粉冠1号 Fenguan 1 | 44.43±11.13fghi | 22.23±3.68ijk | MR |
| 精品红美女 Jingpinhongmeinv | 55.57±5.56efgh | 23.63±3.67hijk | MR |
| 元明粉玉女 Yuanmingfenyunv | 55.57±5.57efgh | 31.97±5.02ghij | MS |
| 粉果番茄 Fenguofanqie | 61.13±5.57defg | 33.33±4.82ghij | MS |
| 贼不偷绿宝石 Zeibutoulvbaoshi | 55.57±5.57efgh | 34.70±1.40fghij | MS |
| 花绣球 Huaxiuqiu | 66.70±0.00cdef | 34.73±3.68fghij | MS |
| 精品威尼斯 Jingpinweinisi | 61.13±5.57defg | 34.73±5.02fghij | MS |
| 红玉189 Hongyu 189 | 55.57±5.57efgh | 34.73±7.72fghij | MS |
| 粉圣果 Fenshengguo | 66.67±9.61cdef | 36.10±6.04fghij | MS |
| 黄色樱桃 Huangseyingtao | 61.13±5.57defg | 37.50±6.36fghij | MS |
| 大黄金丽 Dahuangjinli | 66.67±9.61cdef | 38.90±2.80efghi | MS |
| 美味樱桃 Meiweiyingtao | 72.23±5.53bcde | 38.90±4.99efghi | MS |
| 黄圆小番茄 Huangyuanxiaofanqie | 66.67±9.61cdef | 38.90±6.05efghi | MS |
| F199 | 72.23±5.53bcde | 40.27±3.68efgh | S |
| 奇欧佳美 Qioujiamei | 72.23±5.53bcde | 43.07±3.67efg | S |
| 黄洋梨 Huangyangli | 77.77±5.53abcde | 44.43±6.07defg | S |
| 红五彩 Hongwucai | 77.80±11.10abcde | 44.43±9.11defg | S |
| 法国红瑞娜 Faguohongruina | 77.77±5.53abcde | 44.47±9.71defg | S |
| 中蔬4号 Zhongshu 4 | 77.77±5.53abcde | 45.83±2.39cdefg | S |
| 绿宝石 Lvbaoshi | 72.23±5.53bcde | 45.83±8.67cdefg | S |
| 富丽 Fuli | 77.77±5.53abcde | 47.23±5.02cdefg | S |
| 金童F1 Jintong F1 | 77.77±5.53abcde | 48.60±2.80cdefg | S |
| 元明黄娇子 Yuanminghuangjiaozi | 83.33±9.61abcd | 52.80±6.04bcdef | S |
| 红色樱桃 Hongseyingtao | 83.33±9.61abcd | 52.80±7.35bcdef | S |
| 改良春桃 Gailiangchuntao | 88.87±5.57abc | 55.57±3.67abcde | S |
| 紫五彩 Ziwucai | 88.87±5.57abc | 61.13±3.67abcd | HS |
| 托托斯加 Tuotuosijia | 94.43±5.57ab | 62.50±6.36abc | HS |
| 紫圣果 Zishengguo | 100.00±0.00a | 63.87±3.67ab | HS |
| 迷你紫圣果 Minizishengguo | 100.00±0.00a | 63.90±1.40ab | HS |
| 千禧圣女果 Qianxishengnvguo | 94.43±5.57ab | 65.27±2.77a | HS |
| 药剂 Fungicide | 浓度 Concentration (μg/mL) | 抑菌率 Inhibition ratio(%) | 斜率±标准误 Slope±SE | EC50(95%FL) (μg/mL) | X2 (df) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58%甲霜灵·代森锰锌可湿性粉剂 58% metalaxyl-mancozeb WP | 1 160.00 | 62.55±0.34a | 0.78±0.09 | 409.76(361.69~464.23) | 0.425(3) |
| 580.00 | 56.07±1.36b | ||||
| 386.67 | 50.19±1.80c | ||||
| 290.00 | 46.47±2.56d | ||||
| 232.00 | 40.19±1.22e | ||||
| 30%噻森铜·戊唑醇悬浮剂 30% thiazenol copper pentazolol SC | 200.00 | 89.01±1.80a | 1.66±0.27 | 30.93(22.00~43.47) | 3.128(3) |
| 100.00 | 84.31±1.22b | ||||
| 66.67 | 74.70±0.59c | ||||
| 50.00 | 62.15±2.07d | ||||
| 40.00 | 52.94±2.12e | ||||
| 15%三唑酮可湿性粉剂 15% triazolone WP | 150.00 | 80.59±2.35a | 1.67±0.31 | 38.46(29.80~49.64) | 5.119(3) |
| 75.00 | 73.53±2.12b | ||||
| 50.00 | 64.51±3.23c | ||||
| 37.50 | 45.69±3.83d | ||||
| 30.00 | 38.63±1.89e | ||||
| 12.5%烯唑醇可湿性粉剂 12.5% diniconazole WP | 125.00 | 79.80±0.89a | 1.21±0.09 | 24.86(21.88~28.24) | 0.459(3) |
| 62.50 | 68.04±1.22b | ||||
| 41.67 | 63.33±2.78c | ||||
| 31.25 | 55.09±1.80d | ||||
| 25.00 | 48.24±1.02e | ||||
| 70%烯酰·嘧菌酯水分散粒剂 70% enoyl azoxystrobin WG | 200.00 | 66.86±1.89a | 1.31±0.05 | 90.35(86.73~94.11) | 0.121(3) |
| 100.00 | 52.94±2.03b | ||||
| 66.67 | 44.31±1.48c | ||||
| 50.00 | 36.47±2.12d | ||||
| 40.00 | 31.37±0.34e | ||||
| 60%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂 60% phenoxymeclozole WG | 600.00 | 89.80±1.48a | 1.77±0.17 | 104.04(86.98~124.44) | 1.150(3) |
| 300.00 | 82.35±2.12b | ||||
| 200.00 | 70.59±1.56c | ||||
| 150.00 | 60.59±1.18d | ||||
| 120.00 | 51.76±1.56e | ||||
| 80%多菌灵可湿性粉剂 80% carbendazim WP | 800.00 | 82.94±2.12a | 1.31±0.23 | 132.42(95.15~184.29) | 4.946(3) |
| 400.00 | 73.33±1.48b | ||||
| 200.00 | 65.89±4.81c | ||||
| 133.33 | 53.92±1.48d | ||||
| 100.00 | 36.08±2.38e |
Tab.4 Changes of the fungicides with different concentration on mycelial growth of Fusarium solani
| 药剂 Fungicide | 浓度 Concentration (μg/mL) | 抑菌率 Inhibition ratio(%) | 斜率±标准误 Slope±SE | EC50(95%FL) (μg/mL) | X2 (df) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58%甲霜灵·代森锰锌可湿性粉剂 58% metalaxyl-mancozeb WP | 1 160.00 | 62.55±0.34a | 0.78±0.09 | 409.76(361.69~464.23) | 0.425(3) |
| 580.00 | 56.07±1.36b | ||||
| 386.67 | 50.19±1.80c | ||||
| 290.00 | 46.47±2.56d | ||||
| 232.00 | 40.19±1.22e | ||||
| 30%噻森铜·戊唑醇悬浮剂 30% thiazenol copper pentazolol SC | 200.00 | 89.01±1.80a | 1.66±0.27 | 30.93(22.00~43.47) | 3.128(3) |
| 100.00 | 84.31±1.22b | ||||
| 66.67 | 74.70±0.59c | ||||
| 50.00 | 62.15±2.07d | ||||
| 40.00 | 52.94±2.12e | ||||
| 15%三唑酮可湿性粉剂 15% triazolone WP | 150.00 | 80.59±2.35a | 1.67±0.31 | 38.46(29.80~49.64) | 5.119(3) |
| 75.00 | 73.53±2.12b | ||||
| 50.00 | 64.51±3.23c | ||||
| 37.50 | 45.69±3.83d | ||||
| 30.00 | 38.63±1.89e | ||||
| 12.5%烯唑醇可湿性粉剂 12.5% diniconazole WP | 125.00 | 79.80±0.89a | 1.21±0.09 | 24.86(21.88~28.24) | 0.459(3) |
| 62.50 | 68.04±1.22b | ||||
| 41.67 | 63.33±2.78c | ||||
| 31.25 | 55.09±1.80d | ||||
| 25.00 | 48.24±1.02e | ||||
| 70%烯酰·嘧菌酯水分散粒剂 70% enoyl azoxystrobin WG | 200.00 | 66.86±1.89a | 1.31±0.05 | 90.35(86.73~94.11) | 0.121(3) |
| 100.00 | 52.94±2.03b | ||||
| 66.67 | 44.31±1.48c | ||||
| 50.00 | 36.47±2.12d | ||||
| 40.00 | 31.37±0.34e | ||||
| 60%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂 60% phenoxymeclozole WG | 600.00 | 89.80±1.48a | 1.77±0.17 | 104.04(86.98~124.44) | 1.150(3) |
| 300.00 | 82.35±2.12b | ||||
| 200.00 | 70.59±1.56c | ||||
| 150.00 | 60.59±1.18d | ||||
| 120.00 | 51.76±1.56e | ||||
| 80%多菌灵可湿性粉剂 80% carbendazim WP | 800.00 | 82.94±2.12a | 1.31±0.23 | 132.42(95.15~184.29) | 4.946(3) |
| 400.00 | 73.33±1.48b | ||||
| 200.00 | 65.89±4.81c | ||||
| 133.33 | 53.92±1.48d | ||||
| 100.00 | 36.08±2.38e |
| 处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence rate (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 防效 Field control effect(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58%甲霜灵·代森锰锌可湿性粉剂 58% metalaxyl-mancozeb WP | 45.98±0.26a | 44.19±0.61b | 5.19±2.01e |
| 30%噻森铜·戊唑醇悬浮剂 30% thiazenol copper pentazolol SC | 30.88±0.34e | 25.24±0.62fg | 45.89±0.85a |
| 15%三唑酮可湿性粉剂 15% triazolone WP | 31.73±0.21e | 26.13±0.40f | 43.95±0.88a |
| 12.5%烯唑醇可湿性粉剂 12.5% diniconazole WP | 28.61±0.50f | 24.46±0.46g | 47.52±1.48a |
| 70%烯酰·嘧菌酯水分散粒剂 70% enoyl azoxystrobin WG | 36.95±0.26c | 30.36±0.32d | 34.87±1.13c |
| 60%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂 60% phenoxymeclozole WG | 33.93±0.15d | 28.24±0.44e | 39.41±1.44b |
| 80%多菌灵可湿性粉剂 80% carbendazim WP | 38.52±0.13b | 32.48±0.69c | 30.35±1.09d |
| CK | 46.18±0.50a | 46.63±0.44a | - |
Tab.5 Field control effect of different fungicide treatments on tomato Fusarium solani root rot
| 处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence rate (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 防效 Field control effect(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58%甲霜灵·代森锰锌可湿性粉剂 58% metalaxyl-mancozeb WP | 45.98±0.26a | 44.19±0.61b | 5.19±2.01e |
| 30%噻森铜·戊唑醇悬浮剂 30% thiazenol copper pentazolol SC | 30.88±0.34e | 25.24±0.62fg | 45.89±0.85a |
| 15%三唑酮可湿性粉剂 15% triazolone WP | 31.73±0.21e | 26.13±0.40f | 43.95±0.88a |
| 12.5%烯唑醇可湿性粉剂 12.5% diniconazole WP | 28.61±0.50f | 24.46±0.46g | 47.52±1.48a |
| 70%烯酰·嘧菌酯水分散粒剂 70% enoyl azoxystrobin WG | 36.95±0.26c | 30.36±0.32d | 34.87±1.13c |
| 60%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂 60% phenoxymeclozole WG | 33.93±0.15d | 28.24±0.44e | 39.41±1.44b |
| 80%多菌灵可湿性粉剂 80% carbendazim WP | 38.52±0.13b | 32.48±0.69c | 30.35±1.09d |
| CK | 46.18±0.50a | 46.63±0.44a | - |
| [1] | Dorais M, Ehret D L, Papadopoulos A P. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer[J]. Phytochemistry Reviews, 2008, 7(2): 231-250. |
| [2] | de Las Mercedes Capobianco-Uriarte M, Aparicio J, De Pablo-Valenciano J, et al. The European tomato market. An approach by export competitiveness maps[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(5): e0250867. |
| [3] | 李潇. 番茄镰孢菌根腐类病害病原和种抗性鉴定及其药剂筛选[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2019. |
| LI Xiao. Identification of the pathogen and variety resistance on tomato Fusarium root diseases and fungicide screening[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2019. | |
| [4] | Olowe O M, Nicola L, Asemoloye M D, et al. Trichoderma: Potential bio-resource for the management of tomato root rot diseases in Africa[J]. Microbiological Research, 2022, 257: 126978. |
| [5] |
杜建峰, 吴伟, 张晓英, 等. 番茄颈腐根腐病的发生及其防治研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(10): 200-206.
DOI |
|
DU Jianfeng, WU Wei, ZHANG Xiaoying, et al. Research progress on the occurrence and control of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(10): 200-206.
DOI |
|
| [6] | 刘蕾, 王辉. 番茄颈腐根腐病病原菌及抗病育种研究进展[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2016(6): 35-37. |
| LIU Lei, WANG Hui. Research progress of tomato Fusarium crown and root rot pathogen and resistance breeding[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2016(6): 35-37. | |
| [7] | Behiry S I, Soliman S A, Al-Mansori A A, et al. Chorisia speciosa extract induces systemic resistance against tomato root rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(10): 2309. |
| [8] | Abd-Ellatif S, Ibrahim A A, Safhi F A, et al. Green synthesized of Thymus vulgaris chitosan nanoparticles induce relative WRKY-genes expression in Solanum lycopersicum against Fusarium solani, the causal agent of root rot disease[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(22): 3129. |
| [9] | Pane A, Agosteo G E, Cacciola S O. Phytophthora species causing crown and root rot of tomato in southern Italy[J]. EPPO Bulletin, 2000, 30(2): 251-255. |
| [10] | 赵万千, 王林成, 郭青范, 等. 高寒阴湿地区果菜类蔬菜根腐病的发生与防治[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2009(23): 22-23. |
| ZHAO Wanqian, WANG Lincheng, GUO Qingfan, et al. Occurrence and control of root rot of fruits and vegetables in cold and humid areas[J]. China Vegetables, 2009(23): 22-23. | |
| [11] | 耿桂俊, 李晶晶, 白岗栓, 等. 河套灌区番茄根腐病的发生与防治[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(23): 154-156. |
| GENG Guijun, LI Jingjing, BAI Gangshuan, et al. Occurrence and control of tomato root rot in Hetao irrigation district[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010(23): 154-156. | |
| [12] | 李林, 徐作廷, 李长松, 等. 设施蔬菜中为害较重的几种病害(一)[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2010(15): 19-21. |
| LI Lin, XU Zuoyan, LI Changsong, et al. Several more harmful diseases in facility vegetables (The first section)[J]. China Vegetables, 2010(15): 26-28. | |
| [13] | 王春丽, 张春竹. 新疆加工番茄主要真菌性病害防治技术[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012(12): 149-152. |
| WANG Chunli, ZHANG Chunzhu. Control techniques of main fungal diseases of processing tomato in Xinjiang[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012(12): 149-152. | |
| [14] | 向妮. 豌豆根腐病茄镰孢菌遗传多样性及抗性资源筛选[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011. |
| XIANG Ni. Genetic diversity and screening of resistant resources of Fusarium solani against pea root rot[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011. | |
| [15] | 闫文雪. 我国三种蔬菜镰孢菌专化型的鉴定及新病害的发现[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019. |
| YAN Wenxue. Identification of Fusarium formae speciales on three vegetables and the discovery of new diseases in China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019. | |
| [16] | 李信云, 李静, 许彬, 等. 茄果类蔬菜常见3种土传病害药剂筛选及增效作用[J]. 农药, 2023, 62(3): 217-222. |
| LI Xinyun, LI Jing, XU Bin, et al. Screening and synergistic effects of pesticides for three soil-borne diseases in solanaceous vegetables[J]. Agrochemicals, 2023, 62(3): 217-222. | |
| [17] | 周黎, 李国英, 丁建军. 新疆加工番茄根腐病病原的分离和鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2008, 45(1): 130-134. |
| ZHOU Li, LI Guoying, DING Jianjun. Isolation and identification of pathogen of root-rot disease processing tomato in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 45(1): 130-134. | |
| [18] | 刘海洋, 王伟, 张仁福, 等. 北疆棉花黄萎病发病率调查及土壤中黄萎病菌微菌核数量与种群类型分析[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(4): 276-283, 292. |
| LIU Haiyang, WANG Wei, ZHANG Renfu, et al. Investigation on the incidence rate of Verticillium wilt and analysis on the number of microsclerotia and the population type of Verticillium dahliae in soil of Northern Xinjiang[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(4): 276-283, 292. | |
| [19] | 李雪萍, 许世洋, 汪学苗, 等. 青海省青稞根腐病调查及病原菌鉴定[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(4): 757-765. |
| LI Xueping, XU Shiyang, WANG Xuemiao, et al. Field survey and pathogen identification of naked barley root rot in Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(4): 757-765. | |
| [20] | 潘卫萍, 张彩颖, 张娟. 番茄品种黄化曲叶病毒病抗性评价[J]. 农村科技, 2015(4): 31-32. |
| PAN Weiping, ZHANG Caiying, ZHANG Juan. Evaluation on resistance of tomato varieties to yellow leaf curl virus disease[J]. Rural Science & Technology, 2015(4): 31-32. | |
| [21] | 蔺珂, 梁巧兰, 魏列新, 等. 5种矿物源农药对兰州百合3种病害室内防效评价[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(1): 338-346. |
| LIN Ke, LIANG Qiaolan, WEI Liexin, et al. Evaluation of indoor control effects of five mineral pesticides against three diseases of Lanzhou lily[J]. Plant Protection, 2022, 48(1): 338-346. | |
| [22] | 徐明玥, 江健伟, 刘艮森, 等. 白及锈病的病原鉴定及其田间防治药剂筛选[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(4): 269-275. |
| XU Mingyue, JIANG Jianwei, LIU Gensen, et al. Pathogen identification and field control agents screening of leaf rust of Bletilla striata[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(4): 269-275. | |
| [23] | 尚春明, 高振江, 李秀华, 等. 番茄早疫病抗性材料的苗期接种鉴定[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(14): 1-5. |
| SHANG Chunming, GAO Zhenjiang, LI Xiuhua, et al. Inoculation identification of tomato germplasm resistance to early blight at seedling stage[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(14): 1-5. | |
| [24] | 郭威涛, 周俊国, 吴长柳, 等. 加工番茄细菌性斑点病抗性评价体系的建立及微生物防治菌剂筛选[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(5): 51-56. |
| GUO Weitao, ZHOU Junguo, WU Changliu, et al. Establishment of resistance evaluation system for bacterial spot of processing tomato and screening of biological agents[J]. China Vegetables, 2018(5): 51-56. | |
| [25] | 刘梅, 金添, 王慧, 等. 防治葡萄溃疡病的杀菌剂筛选与评价[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(3): 323-327, 337. |
| LIU Mei, JIN Tian, WANG Hui, et al. Screening and evaluation of fungicides for controlling grapevine Botryosphaeria dieback[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(3): 323-327, 337. | |
| [26] | 孙广宇, 宗兆锋. 植物病理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002: 14. |
| SUN Guangyu, ZONG Zhaofeng. Laboratory manual of plant pathology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2002: 14. | |
| [27] | 赵杨, 苗则彦, 李颖, 等. 番茄品种抗病性鉴定研究进展[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2012(6): 38-44. |
| ZHAO Yang, MIAO Zeyan, LI Ying, et al. Advance in evaluation of tomato disease resistance[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2012(6): 38-44. | |
| [28] |
田兆丰, 刘伟成, 厚凌宇, 等. 不同番茄品种对番茄黄化曲叶病毒的抗病性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(14): 2850-2856.
DOI |
|
TIAN Zhaofeng, LIU Weicheng, HOU Lingyu, et al. Analysis of Resistance of Different Tomato Varieties to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus in Tomato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(14): 2850-2856.
DOI |
|
| [29] | 马晓春, 李建设, 高艳明, 等. 宁夏地区不同品系番茄主要病毒病种类鉴定及复合侵染研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(11): 2536-2543. |
| MA Xiaochun, LI Jianshe, GAO Yanming, et al. Identification and co-infection of main virus diseases of different strains of tomato in Ningxia area[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(11): 2536-2543. | |
| [30] | 汪静, 梁宗锁, 康冰, 等. 文山三七根腐病病原真菌的鉴定与药剂防治[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(1): 158-163. |
| WANG Jing, LIANG Zongsuo, KANG Bing, et al. Identification of root rot pathogen of Panax notoginsengfrom Wenshan[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(1): 158-163. | |
| [31] | 陈雨姗, 尹群, 王杰, 等. 红花玉兰根腐病化学防治药剂的室内筛选及毒力测定[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(9): 107-113. |
| CHEN Yushan, YIN Qun, WANG Jie, et al. Laboratory screening and virulence determination of chemical agents for controlling root rot of Magnolia wufengensis[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2020, 48(9): 107-113. | |
| [32] | 陈应娥, 梁巧兰, 刘耀霞, 等. 饲用玉米根腐病病原鉴定及室内药剂筛选[J]. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 100-105. |
| CHEN Yinge, LIANG Qiaolan, LIU Yaoxia, et al. Identification on pathogen of maize root rot and fungicides screening in laboratory[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 100-105. | |
| [33] | 张天静, 孙文松, 刘坤, 等. 辽藁本根腐病菌室内药剂筛选[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2023(2): 79-81. |
| ZHANG Tianjing, SUN Wensong, LIU Kun, et al. Screening of fungicide against root rot of Ligusticum jeholense in laboratory[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2023(2): 79-81. | |
| [34] | 阮柳, 马占鸿, 刘振宇, 等. 苜蓿根腐病的病原分离、鉴定与杀菌剂毒力测定[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(6): 56-67. |
| RUAN Liu, MA Zhanhong, LIU Zhenyu, et al. Isolation, identification and toxicity determination of pathogens causing alfalfa root rot[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016, 21(6): 56-67. | |
| [35] | 管磊, 郭贝贝, 王晓坤, 等. 苯醚甲环唑等杀菌剂包衣种子防治花生冠腐病和根腐病[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(5): 842-849. |
| GUAN Lei, GUO Beibei, WANG Xiaokun, et al. Seed-coating treatment of four fungicides against peanut crown rot and root rot diseases[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2016, 43(5): 842-849. | |
| [36] | 张建荣, 杨富位, 马生彪, 等. 5种杀菌剂对蚕豆赤斑病菌的室内毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(6): 935-941. |
| ZHANG Jianrong, YANG Fuwei, MA Shengbiao, et al. In vivo activity and field control effects of five fungicides against Botrytis fabae on Vicia faba[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 935-941. | |
| [37] | 王丽, 田玉洁, 刘巍, 等. 21种化学药剂对猕猴桃黑点病菌(Diaporthe phaseolorum)的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(5): 772-780. |
| WANG Li, TIAN Yujie, LIU Wei, et al. Toxicity of 21 chemical fungicides against Diaporthe phaseolorum of kiwifruit and field control effectiveness[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 772-780. | |
| [38] | 王垚, 黄纯杨, 杨亮, 等. 烟草青枯病复配增效药剂筛选及田间防效[J]. 农药, 2022, 61(10): 776-780. |
| WANG Yao, HUANG Chunyang, YANG Liang, et al. Selection on synergetic ratio of combine pesticides to tobacco bacterial wilt and their field control effect[J]. Agrochemicals, 2022, 61(10): 776-780. | |
| [39] | 刘妍, 张亚, 项雅琴, 等. 啶酰菌胺与氟啶胺复配物对水稻纹枯病菌和草莓灰霉病菌的增效作用研究[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(2): 235-240. |
| LIU Yan, ZHANG Ya, XIANG Yaqin, et al. Synergism of boscalid-fluazinam mixtures against Rhizoctonia solani and Botrytis cinerea[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(2): 235-240. | |
| [40] | 张洪, 张纯标, 张静. 一种含有戊唑醇与噻森铜的复配杀菌组合物在防治小麦赤霉病上的应用: CN112042660A[P]. 2020-12-08. |
| [1] | ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, SHI Jia, KONG Depeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, LI Jianfeng, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru, ZHANG Yueqiang. Effects of soil moisture on leaf protective enzyme activities and yield of spring wheat cultivars with different drought resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047. |
| [2] | DING Xinhua, WANG Zhihui, JIA Zunzun, FU Kaiyun, Tursun Ahemaiti, YANG Jie, GUO Wenchao. Identification and Evaluation of Resistance to Borer of Main Maize Varieties in Different Growth Stages in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1180-1188. |
| [3] | Kuerbannisa Aobulikasimu, WANG JUN, WANG Zhihui, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, FU Kaiyun, Arziguli Rouzi, Tursun Ahmat , HE Jiang, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Preliminary Evaluation of Insect Resistance of 47 Main Corn Varieties in Xinjiang Corn Producing Area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(7): 1197-1206. |
| [4] | . Screening and Analysis of TYLCV Resistance in Different Varieties of Tomatoes [J]. , 2016, 53(8): 1460-1466. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||