Evaluation of high quality development of tomato products export trade in Xinjiang

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.10.027

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To analyze the high-quality development level of tomato product export trade in Xinjiang and the factors affecting its high-quality development, in order to provide reference for promoting the high-quality development of tomato product export trade in Xinjiang. 【Methods】 Based on the new development concept, taking the leading enterprises in tomato industrialization in Xinjiang as the research object, an evaluation index system for the high-quality development of tomato product export trade in Xinjiang was constructed from five dimensions: innovation, greenness, coordination, openness, and sharing. The AHP fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to measure the level of high-quality development of tomato product export trade in Xinjiang, and the development advantages and influencing factors of Xinjiang tomato products in various dimensions were analyzed. 【Results】 (1) Overall, the comprehensive score for the high-quality development level of tomato product export trade in Xinjiang was 0.50 points, with an evaluation level of II, which was at a relatively good level of development. (2) At the dimension level, the comprehensive score of the open dimension level was 0.09 points, the comprehensive score of the shared dimension level was 0.06 points, and the evaluation level was at level II, at a relatively good level of development; The dimensions of innovation, greenness, and coordination were evaluated at level III, indicating it was at a poor development. The comprehensive scores were 0.14 points, 0.11 points, and 0.05 points. 【Conclusion】 The development level of tomato product export trade in Xinjiang has reached level II with good development,that is, the level of open development and shared development has reached level II, while the level of innovative development, green development, and coordinated development is at level III.

Key words: tomato products; export trade; high-quality development; comprehensive evaluation model

摘要：

【目的】 分析新疆番茄制品出口贸易高质量发展水平及其影响因素,为促进新疆番茄制品出口贸易高质量发展提供参考依据。【方法】 以新疆番茄产业化龙头企业为研究对象,从创新、绿色、协调、开放和共享5个维度,构建新疆番茄制品出口贸易高质量发展评价指标体系,运用AHP-模糊综合评价法,测度新疆番茄制品出口贸易高质量发展水平,分析新疆番茄制品出口贸易在5个维度的发展水平及影响因素。【结果】 (1)新疆番茄制品出口贸易高质量发展水平的综合得分为0.50分,评价等级为Ⅱ级,处于发展较好水平。(2)开放维度水平综合得分为0.09分,共享维度水平综合得分为0.06分,评价等级均为Ⅱ级,处于发展较好水平;创新、绿色、协调维度水平,评价等级均为Ⅲ级,处于发展较差水平,综合得分为0.14分、0.11分和0.05分。【结论】 新疆番茄制品出口贸易发展水平达到Ⅱ级发展较好水平,其中,开放和共享发展水平达到Ⅱ级,创新、绿色及协调发展水平处于Ⅲ级。

关键词: 番茄制品, 出口贸易, 高质量发展, 综合评价模型

CLC Number:

S641.2

LIU Jiahui, LI Hong, WANG Jingjing, CHANG Chiyin. Evaluation of high quality development of tomato products export trade in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2593-2600.

刘佳慧, 李红, 汪晶晶, 常持银. 新疆番茄制品出口贸易高质量发展的测度与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2593-2600.

Figures/Tables 5

References 23

[3]	杨传甲, 李玉林, 刘中海, 等. 机采番茄原料清洗过程自动化改造与集成应用[J]. 自动化应用, 2021, (2): 146-148.
	YANG Chuanjia, LI Yulin, LIU Zhonghai, et al. Automation transformation and integrated application of the cleaning process of machine-picked tomato raw materials[J]. Automation Application, 2021, (2): 146-148.
[4]	张超, 李晓艳, 汪晶晶. 绿色贸易壁垒对新疆番茄及其制品出口影响分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2022, (9): 135-141.
	ZHANG Chao, LI Xiaoyan, WANG Jingjing. Influence of green trade barriers on export of tomato and its products in Xinjiang[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022, (9): 135-141.
[5]	陈万灵, 卢万青. “双循环”背景下中国外贸高质量发展的新理念和新对策[J]. 国际商务研究, 2021, 42(6): 25-34.
	CHEN Wanling, LU Wanqing. New ideas and countermeasures for the high-quality development of China’s foreign trade under the new economic and trade situation[J]. International Business Research, 2021, 42(6): 25-34.
[6]	何莉. 基于AHP的中国对外贸易质量综合评价[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2011, 27(9): 17-22, 51.
	HE Li. The analytical hierarchy process evaluation of the quality of Chinese foreign trade[J]. International Economics and Trade Research, 2011, 27(9): 17-22, 51.
[7]	王磊, 白昱, 税璐瑶. 天津市制造业高质量发展竞争力评价研究[J]. 科技和产业, 2023, 23(2): 122-127.
	WANG Lei, BAI Yu, SHUI Luyao. Research on evaluation of competitiveness of high quality development of Tianjin manufacturing industry[J]. Science Technology and Industry, 2023, 23(2): 122-127.
[8]	蒲艳萍, 王玲. 我国对外贸易可持续发展能力的综合评价[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2007, (7): 77-82, 88.
	PU Yanping, WANG Ling. Comprehensive appraisal on Chinese foreign trade’s sustainable development ability[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2007, (7): 77-82, 88.
[9]	曹俊文, 雷清雅. 新发展理念下我国对外贸易高质量发展评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(15): 100-104.
	CAO Junwen, LEI Qingya. Evaluation of high-quality development of China’s foreign trade under the new development concept[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2021, 37(15): 100-104.
[10]	吴艳秋, 张曙霄. 我国贸易质量演进及其现状评价[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021,(5): 146-155.
	WU Yanqiu, ZHANG Shuxiao. Quality evolution and comprehensive assessment of China’s trade[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2021,(5): 146-155.
[11]	陈峰, 赵立新, 张丽. 定性综合评价方法在创新评估中的应用——以层次分析法和模糊综合评价方法为例[J]. 今日科苑, 2021, (8): 77-85.
	CHEN Feng, ZHAO Lixin, ZHANG Li. Application of qualitative comprehensive evaluation method in innovation evaluation—a case study of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Modern Science, 2021, (8): 77-85.
[12]	张默, 孙科. 农业高质量发展理论内涵、水平测度及评价研究[J]. 农业经济, 2021,(5): 6-8.
	ZHANG Mo, SUN Ke. Theoretical connotation, level measurement and evaluation of agricultural high-quality development[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2021,(5): 6-8.
[13]	宫汝娜, 张涛. 区域高质量发展的内涵与测度研究——九大国家中心城市的实证分析[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2021, (1): 105-110.
	GONG Runa, ZHANG Tao. Research on the connotation and measurement of regional high-quality development—empirical analysis of nine national central cities[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2021, (1): 105-110.
[1]	刘超. 新疆番茄加工产业的现状及发展前景分析[J]. 现代食品, 2018, (13): 4-5, 9.
	LIU Chao. Analysis on the status quo and development prospect of processing tomato industry in Xinjiang[J]. Modern Food, 2018, (13): 4-5, 9.
[2]	李凯, 谭丹. 新疆番茄产业国际竞争力分析[J]. 现代商业, 2018, (35): 65-68.
	LI Kai, TAN Dan. Analysis on international competitiveness of tomato industry in Xinjiang[J]. Modern Business, 2018, (35): 65-68.
[14]	武凤平. 提升“三品一标” 推进农业绿色发展[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2022, 2(1): 91-93.
	WU Fengping. Promoting “three products and one standard” and promoting the green development of agriculture[J]. Journal of Smart Agriculture, 2022, 2(1): 91-93.
[15]	陈玉兰, 程旭睿, 郭君, 等. 我国农业绿色发展水平地区差异及分布动态演进[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 252-260. DOI
	CHEN Yulan, CHENG Xurui, GUO Jun, et al. Regional difference and dynamic evolution of agricultural green development level in China[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 252-260. DOI
[16]	孙豪, 桂河清, 杨冬. 中国省域经济高质量发展的测度与评价[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2020, (8): 4-14, 155.
	SUN Hao, GUI Heqing, YANG Dong. Measurement and evaluation of the high-quality of China’s provincial economic development[J]. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2020, (8): 4-14, 155.
[17]	马贞. 新疆番茄产业发展问题研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2013.
	MA Zhen. Study on the Development of Tomato Industry in Xinjiang Province[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2013.
[18]	张汉亚, 张长春. 投资环境研究[M]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2005: 24-38.
	ZHANG Hanya, ZHANG Changchun. Research on investment environment[M]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2005: 24-38.
[19]	王俭, 孙铁珩, 李培军, 等. 基于人工神经网络的区域水环境承载力评价模型及其应用[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(1): 139-144.
	WANG Jian, SUN Tieheng, LI Peijun, et al. Evaluation model of regional water environment carrying capacity based on artificial neural network and its application in Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(1): 139-144.
[20]	穆向明, 魏哲. 企业技术创新能力及其综合评价研究[J]. 商场现代化, 2006, (21): 22-24.
	MU Xiangming, WEI Zhe. Research on Enterprise Technological Innovation Capability and Its Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Market Modernization, 2006, (21): 22-24.
[21]	朱新鑫, 陈明明. 番茄制品出口技术复杂度与出口增长——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J]. 河北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(2): 37-46.
	ZHU Xinxin, CHEN Mingming. Technical complexity and export growth of tomato products: an empirical analysis based on cross-country panel data[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 2023, 25(2): 37-46.
[22]	刘益星. 我国番茄制品出口竞争力提升的路径及策略[J]. 对外经贸实务, 2019,(4): 50-52.
	LIU Yixing. The path and strategy of improving the export competitiveness of tomato products in China[J]. Practice in Foreign Economic Relations and Trade, 2019,(4): 50-52.
[23]	林秋平, 李元辉. 新疆番茄产业发展现状及问题分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2013, (23): 187-189.
	LIN Qiuping, LI Yuanhui. Development status and problems analysis of Xinjiang tomato industry[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2013, (23): 187-189.

一级指标(权重W) Level 1 indicators (weight function W)	二级指标 Level 2 indicators	二级指标相对一级(权重W₁) Second level of indicators relative to the first (weight function W₁)	指标属性 Attribute for the indicator
创新发展C₁ Innovation and development	R&D研究支持度C₁₁^[10]	0.192 0	正向
创新发展C₁ Innovation and development	精深加工产品出口贸易份额C₁₂^[9]	0.117 0	正向
0.386 5	在岗职工人均受教育程度C₁₃	0.077 4	正向
绿色发展C₂ Green development	原料损耗率C₁₄	0.046 6	逆向
绿色发展C₂ Green development	番茄制品3品1标数量C₁₅^[14]	0.070 1	正向
0.240 6	出口备案基地的番茄种植农药使用强度C₁₆^[15]	0.067 3	逆向
协调发展C₃ Co-ordinated development	出口备案基地的番茄种植化肥使用强度C₁₇^[15]	0.056 5	逆向
协调发展C₃ Co-ordinated development	一般贸易占比C₁₈^[10]	0.042 9	正向
0.117 8	出口备案基地占比C₁₉	0.047 9	正向
开放发展C₄ Open development	出口市场分散度C₂₀	0.027 1	正向
开放发展C₄ Open development	出口依存度C₂₁^[10]	0.034 6	正向
0.133 0	国际市场占有率C₂₂	0.073 5	正向
共享发展C₅ Shered development	企业番茄制品出口总额占新疆番茄制品出口总额比重C₂₃	0.024 9	正向
共享发展C₅ Shered development	企业从业人员数C₂₄^[9]	0.040 0	正向
0.122 1	加工番茄原料市场采购量C₂₅	0.059 7	正向
	在岗职工平均工资C₂₆^[16]	0.022 4	正向

一级指标(权重W) Level 1 indicators (weight function W)	二级指标 Level 2 indicators	二级指标相对一级(权重W₁) Second level of indicators relative to the first (weight function W₁)	指标属性 Attribute for the indicator
创新发展C₁ Innovation and development	R&D研究支持度C₁₁^[10]	0.192 0	正向
创新发展C₁ Innovation and development	精深加工产品出口贸易份额C₁₂^[9]	0.117 0	正向
0.386 5	在岗职工人均受教育程度C₁₃	0.077 4	正向
绿色发展C₂ Green development	原料损耗率C₁₄	0.046 6	逆向
绿色发展C₂ Green development	番茄制品3品1标数量C₁₅^[14]	0.070 1	正向
0.240 6	出口备案基地的番茄种植农药使用强度C₁₆^[15]	0.067 3	逆向
协调发展C₃ Co-ordinated development	出口备案基地的番茄种植化肥使用强度C₁₇^[15]	0.056 5	逆向
协调发展C₃ Co-ordinated development	一般贸易占比C₁₈^[10]	0.042 9	正向
0.117 8	出口备案基地占比C₁₉	0.047 9	正向
开放发展C₄ Open development	出口市场分散度C₂₀	0.027 1	正向
开放发展C₄ Open development	出口依存度C₂₁^[10]	0.034 6	正向
0.133 0	国际市场占有率C₂₂	0.073 5	正向
共享发展C₅ Shered development	企业番茄制品出口总额占新疆番茄制品出口总额比重C₂₃	0.024 9	正向
共享发展C₅ Shered development	企业从业人员数C₂₄^[9]	0.040 0	正向
0.122 1	加工番茄原料市场采购量C₂₅	0.059 7	正向
	在岗职工平均工资C₂₆^[16]	0.022 4	正向

级别Grade	C₁₁	C₁₂	C₁₃	C₁₄	C₁₅	C₁₆
Ⅰ	≥5	≥20	≥30	[0,12)	[3,4]	[0,0.25)
Ⅱ	[4,5)	[10,20)	[20,30)	[12,12.7)	[2,3)	[0.25,0.50)
Ⅲ	[3,4)	[5,10)	[10,20)	[12.7,50)	[1,2)	[0.50,0.74)
Ⅳ	[0,3)	[0,5)	[0,10)	≥50	[0,1)	≥0.74
级别Grade	C₁₇			C₁₈	C₁₉	C₂₀
Ⅰ	[0,30)、[0,9)、[0,35)			[98.68,100]	≥4.27	[120,180)
Ⅱ	[30,34)、[9,10.5)、[35,37.5)			[65.79,98.68)	[2.85,4.27)	[60,120)
Ⅲ	[34,38)、[10.5,12)、[37.5,40)			[32.89,65.79)	[1.43,2.85)	[2,60)
Ⅳ	≥38、≥12、≥40			[0,32.89)	[0,1.43)	[0,2)
级别Grade	C₂₁	C₂₂	C₂₃	C₂₄	C₂₅	C₂₆
Ⅰ	[90,100]	≥0.30	≥1.19	≥1 000	≥53 343.30	≥7 266
Ⅱ	[60,90)	[0.20,0.30)	[0.79,1.19)	[300,1 000)	[35 562.20,53 343.30)	[4 844,7 266)
Ⅲ	[30,60)	[0.10,0.20)	[0.40,0.79)	[20,300)	[11 781.00,35 562.20)	[2 422,4 844)
Ⅳ	[0,30)	<0.10	[0,0.40)	[0,20)	[0,11 781.00)	[0,2 422)

级别Grade	C₁₁	C₁₂	C₁₃	C₁₄	C₁₅	C₁₆
Ⅰ	≥5	≥20	≥30	[0,12)	[3,4]	[0,0.25)
Ⅱ	[4,5)	[10,20)	[20,30)	[12,12.7)	[2,3)	[0.25,0.50)
Ⅲ	[3,4)	[5,10)	[10,20)	[12.7,50)	[1,2)	[0.50,0.74)
Ⅳ	[0,3)	[0,5)	[0,10)	≥50	[0,1)	≥0.74
级别Grade	C₁₇			C₁₈	C₁₉	C₂₀
Ⅰ	[0,30)、[0,9)、[0,35)			[98.68,100]	≥4.27	[120,180)
Ⅱ	[30,34)、[9,10.5)、[35,37.5)			[65.79,98.68)	[2.85,4.27)	[60,120)
Ⅲ	[34,38)、[10.5,12)、[37.5,40)			[32.89,65.79)	[1.43,2.85)	[2,60)
Ⅳ	≥38、≥12、≥40			[0,32.89)	[0,1.43)	[0,2)
级别Grade	C₂₁	C₂₂	C₂₃	C₂₄	C₂₅	C₂₆
Ⅰ	[90,100]	≥0.30	≥1.19	≥1 000	≥53 343.30	≥7 266
Ⅱ	[60,90)	[0.20,0.30)	[0.79,1.19)	[300,1 000)	[35 562.20,53 343.30)	[4 844,7 266)
Ⅲ	[30,60)	[0.10,0.20)	[0.40,0.79)	[20,300)	[11 781.00,35 562.20)	[2 422,4 844)
Ⅳ	[0,30)	<0.10	[0,0.40)	[0,20)	[0,11 781.00)	[0,2 422)

级别 Grade	评价等级 Pating	创新维度 The innovation dimension	绿色维度 The green dimension	协调维度 Coordination dimension	开放维度 Open dimension	共享维度 Shared dimensions
Ⅰ	[0.75,1]	[0.30,0.386 5)	[0.18,0.240 6)	[0.09,0.117 8)	[0.10,0.133)	[0.09,0.1221)
Ⅱ	[0.50,0.75)	[0.20,0.30)	[0.12,0.18)	[0.06,0.09)	[0.07,0.10)	[0.06,0.09)
Ⅲ	[0.25,0.50)	[0.10,0.20)	[0.06,0.12)	[0.03,0.06)	[0.03,0.07)	[0.03,0.06)
Ⅳ	[0,0.25)	[0,0.10)	[0,0.06)	[0,0.03)	[0,0.03)	[0,0.03)