Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 1537-1544.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.026
• Prataculture·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian • Previous Articles Next Articles
GE Hui1(), GUO Zengxiang2, ZHAO Wanqian3, WANG Huizhen1, WANG Pan1, LIU Dong1, ZHAO Xin1, DU Tao1(
)
Received:
2021-10-11
Online:
2022-06-20
Published:
2022-07-07
Correspondence author:
DU Tao
Supported by:
葛慧1(), 郭增祥2, 赵万千3, 王惠珍1, 王盼1, 刘东1, 赵鑫1, 杜弢1(
)
通讯作者:
杜弢
作者简介:
葛慧(1997-),女,甘肃人,硕士研究生.研究方向为中药资源开发与质量综合评价,(E-mail) 1125033818@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
GE Hui, GUO Zengxiang, ZHAO Wanqian, WANG Huizhen, WANG Pan, LIU Dong, ZHAO Xin, DU Tao. Effects of Sowing Date and Sowing Rate on Yield and Quality of Angelica sinensis Seedlings and Medicines[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1537-1544.
葛慧, 郭增祥, 赵万千, 王惠珍, 王盼, 刘东, 赵鑫, 杜弢. 播期和播种量对当归熟地种苗及成药产量与质量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1537-1544.
地理信息 Geographic information | 2018年育苗地 The breeding ground in 2018 | 2019年种苗移栽地 Transplant seedlings into the ground in 2019 |
---|---|---|
经度 Altitude | E103°40'92″ | E103°40'92″ |
纬度 Latitude | N35°26'14″ | N35°26'14″ |
海拔 Altitude(m) | 2 430 | 2 430 |
土壤温度范围 Soil temperature range(℃) | 4.48~26.91 | 4.11~21.74 |
土壤平均温度 Mean soil temperature(℃) | 15.83 | 14.02 |
土壤湿度范围 Soil moisture range(%) | 19.57~30.46 | 6.35~37.65 |
土壤平均湿度 Mean soil moisture(%) | 20.25 | 19.74 |
Table 1 Basic information about the test site
地理信息 Geographic information | 2018年育苗地 The breeding ground in 2018 | 2019年种苗移栽地 Transplant seedlings into the ground in 2019 |
---|---|---|
经度 Altitude | E103°40'92″ | E103°40'92″ |
纬度 Latitude | N35°26'14″ | N35°26'14″ |
海拔 Altitude(m) | 2 430 | 2 430 |
土壤温度范围 Soil temperature range(℃) | 4.48~26.91 | 4.11~21.74 |
土壤平均温度 Mean soil temperature(℃) | 15.83 | 14.02 |
土壤湿度范围 Soil moisture range(%) | 19.57~30.46 | 6.35~37.65 |
土壤平均湿度 Mean soil moisture(%) | 20.25 | 19.74 |
处理 Treatment | 全株重 Weight (g) | 单根重 Single weight (g) | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根粗 Root diameter (mm) | 侧根数 Lateral root (条) | 种苗产量 Yield of Seedlings (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1B1 | 0.74±0.14aA | 0.63±0.09aA | 11.50±0.57abAB | 3.90±0.82aABCD | 0.5±0.50a | 49.98±20.34aA |
T1B2 | 0.66±0.10aA | 0.45±0.11bA | 12.11±0.30abAB | 3.65±0.57abcABCD | 0.1±0.23a | 60.19±21.86aA |
T1B3 | 0.61±0.02aA | 0.56±0.06abA | 11.54±0.13abAB | 3.74±0.32abABCD | 0.4±0.06a | 50.97±9.49aA |
T2B1 | 0.62±0.14aA | 0.52±0.13abA | 11.65±1.25abAB | 4.00±0.40aABC | 0.2±0.26a | 11.50±2.76bB |
T2B2 | 0.68±0.17aA | 0.51±0.09abA | 12.36±0.84aA | 4.06±0.09aAB | 0.2±0.23a | 11.37±4.31bB |
T2B3 | 0.76±0.19aA | 0.58±0.11abA | 12.22±1.04aA | 4.22±0.23aA | 0.4±0.64a | 12.97±4.02bB |
T3B1 | 0.29±0.04bB | 0.23±0.05cB | 11.27±0.33abcAB | 2.89±0.14dD | 0.3±0.46a | 2.02±1.50bB |
T3B2 | 0.30±0.07bB | 0.21±0.05cB | 10.13±0.75cB | 3.05±0.19bcdBCD | 0.3±0.42a | 1.88±1.81bB |
T3B3 | 0.30±0.01bB | 0.23±0.04cB | 10.76±0.48bcAB | 2.98±0.09cdCD | 0.1±0.17a | 2.73±1.54bB |
Table 2 Effects of sowing date and sowing amount on morphological index and yield of A.sinensis seedlings grown in cultivated fields
处理 Treatment | 全株重 Weight (g) | 单根重 Single weight (g) | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根粗 Root diameter (mm) | 侧根数 Lateral root (条) | 种苗产量 Yield of Seedlings (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1B1 | 0.74±0.14aA | 0.63±0.09aA | 11.50±0.57abAB | 3.90±0.82aABCD | 0.5±0.50a | 49.98±20.34aA |
T1B2 | 0.66±0.10aA | 0.45±0.11bA | 12.11±0.30abAB | 3.65±0.57abcABCD | 0.1±0.23a | 60.19±21.86aA |
T1B3 | 0.61±0.02aA | 0.56±0.06abA | 11.54±0.13abAB | 3.74±0.32abABCD | 0.4±0.06a | 50.97±9.49aA |
T2B1 | 0.62±0.14aA | 0.52±0.13abA | 11.65±1.25abAB | 4.00±0.40aABC | 0.2±0.26a | 11.50±2.76bB |
T2B2 | 0.68±0.17aA | 0.51±0.09abA | 12.36±0.84aA | 4.06±0.09aAB | 0.2±0.23a | 11.37±4.31bB |
T2B3 | 0.76±0.19aA | 0.58±0.11abA | 12.22±1.04aA | 4.22±0.23aA | 0.4±0.64a | 12.97±4.02bB |
T3B1 | 0.29±0.04bB | 0.23±0.05cB | 11.27±0.33abcAB | 2.89±0.14dD | 0.3±0.46a | 2.02±1.50bB |
T3B2 | 0.30±0.07bB | 0.21±0.05cB | 10.13±0.75cB | 3.05±0.19bcdBCD | 0.3±0.42a | 1.88±1.81bB |
T3B3 | 0.30±0.01bB | 0.23±0.04cB | 10.76±0.48bcAB | 2.98±0.09cdCD | 0.1±0.17a | 2.73±1.54bB |
Fig.1 Comparison of transplantrate of A.sinensis Note:Different lowercase letters indicate differencesamong different factorsat the 0.05 level.Different uppercase letters indicate significant differencesamong different factorsat the 0.01 level.The same as below
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 株幅 Plant length (cm) | 叶片数 Leaf number (个) | 早期抽薹率 Earlier-bolting rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1B1 | 30.73±2.08abcA | 63.47±12.90a | 8.33±3.72a | 4.77±0.52aA |
T1B2 | 27.20±1.00bcA | 56.47±3.92a | 8.13±5.52a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T1B3 | 30.53±3.72abcA | 63.20±7.98a | 7.47±3.86a | 1.76±1.53bcAB |
T2B1 | 30.93±3.26abcA | 55.60±4.16a | 6.20±0.69a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T2B2 | 32.67±3.33abA | 54.73±7.05a | 6.00±2.50a | 3.74±1.76abA |
T2B3 | 25.93±4.47cA | 53.20±2.46a | 7.73±0.12a | 3.34±3.50abAB |
T3B1 | 26.00±3.34cA | 56.13±4.56a | 8.87±7.64a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T3B2 | 32.60±2.09abA | 62.40±3.29a | 7.87±2.76a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T3B3 | 34.07±3.38aA | 59.20±5.20a | 7.53±1.45a | 0.00±0.00cB |
Table 3 Effects of sowing date and sowing amount on the growth and early-bolting rate of A.sinensis plantings after transplanting
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 株幅 Plant length (cm) | 叶片数 Leaf number (个) | 早期抽薹率 Earlier-bolting rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1B1 | 30.73±2.08abcA | 63.47±12.90a | 8.33±3.72a | 4.77±0.52aA |
T1B2 | 27.20±1.00bcA | 56.47±3.92a | 8.13±5.52a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T1B3 | 30.53±3.72abcA | 63.20±7.98a | 7.47±3.86a | 1.76±1.53bcAB |
T2B1 | 30.93±3.26abcA | 55.60±4.16a | 6.20±0.69a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T2B2 | 32.67±3.33abA | 54.73±7.05a | 6.00±2.50a | 3.74±1.76abA |
T2B3 | 25.93±4.47cA | 53.20±2.46a | 7.73±0.12a | 3.34±3.50abAB |
T3B1 | 26.00±3.34cA | 56.13±4.56a | 8.87±7.64a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T3B2 | 32.60±2.09abA | 62.40±3.29a | 7.87±2.76a | 0.00±0.00cB |
T3B3 | 34.07±3.38aA | 59.20±5.20a | 7.53±1.45a | 0.00±0.00cB |
处理 Treatment | 单根重 Single weight (g) | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根粗 Root diameter (mm) | 侧根数 Lateral root number(条) | 产量 Yield (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1B1 | 125.00±18.03aA | 27.45±3.50a | 29.51±1.66a | 8.07±1.03abA | 195.36±45.52bcAB |
T1B2 | 68.67±6.81dC | 27.20±2.12a | 27.81±5.84a | 6.82±0.55bA | 219.49±13.82abcAB |
T1B3 | 121.92±25.55aA | 26.45±0.63a | 30.58±5.27a | 9.80±1.64aA | 272.89±42.23aA |
T2B1 | 106.63±8.03abcAB | 25.39±0.52a | 27.42±0.66a | 8.82±1.96abA | 283.07±26.52aA |
T2B2 | 116.98±11.76abAB | 27.19±0.86a | 29.75±2.18a | 8.68±1.24abA | 280.19±24.17aA |
T2B3 | 86.80±6.16cdBC | 25.12±1.54a | 29.03±1.90a | 8.82±0.71abA | 160.50±36.37cB |
T3B1 | 93.50±7.47bcABC | 26.70±1.30a | 31.55±3.04a | 9.15±1.82abA | 193.42±13.69bcAB |
T3B2 | 94.22±7.38bcABC | 27.90±0.95a | 28.74±2.02a | 8.22±1.75abA | 245.10±25.17abAB |
T3B3 | 104.13±9.67abcB | 28.17±2.23a | 28.20±0.33a | 7.07±0.31bA | 227.99±17.38abAB |
Table 4 Effects of sowing date and sowing amount on the underground part of A.sinensis seedlings from the cultivated fields
处理 Treatment | 单根重 Single weight (g) | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根粗 Root diameter (mm) | 侧根数 Lateral root number(条) | 产量 Yield (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1B1 | 125.00±18.03aA | 27.45±3.50a | 29.51±1.66a | 8.07±1.03abA | 195.36±45.52bcAB |
T1B2 | 68.67±6.81dC | 27.20±2.12a | 27.81±5.84a | 6.82±0.55bA | 219.49±13.82abcAB |
T1B3 | 121.92±25.55aA | 26.45±0.63a | 30.58±5.27a | 9.80±1.64aA | 272.89±42.23aA |
T2B1 | 106.63±8.03abcAB | 25.39±0.52a | 27.42±0.66a | 8.82±1.96abA | 283.07±26.52aA |
T2B2 | 116.98±11.76abAB | 27.19±0.86a | 29.75±2.18a | 8.68±1.24abA | 280.19±24.17aA |
T2B3 | 86.80±6.16cdBC | 25.12±1.54a | 29.03±1.90a | 8.82±0.71abA | 160.50±36.37cB |
T3B1 | 93.50±7.47bcABC | 26.70±1.30a | 31.55±3.04a | 9.15±1.82abA | 193.42±13.69bcAB |
T3B2 | 94.22±7.38bcABC | 27.90±0.95a | 28.74±2.02a | 8.22±1.75abA | 245.10±25.17abAB |
T3B3 | 104.13±9.67abcB | 28.17±2.23a | 28.20±0.33a | 7.07±0.31bA | 227.99±17.38abAB |
性状指标 indicators | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1-单根鲜重 X1-Single weight | 1.000 | ||||||||||
X2-早期抽薹率 X2-Earlier-bolting rate | 0.770* | 1.000 | |||||||||
X3-成活率 X3-transplant rate | 0.151 | 0.000 | 1.000 | ||||||||
X4-株高 X4-Plant height | -0.360 | -0.073 | 0.500 | 1.000 | |||||||
X5-株幅 X5-Plant length | 0.000 | 0.037 | -0.167 | 0.217 | 1.000 | ||||||
X6-叶片数 X6-Leaf number | -0.435 | -0.347 | -0.683* | -0.233 | 0.550 | 1.000 | |||||
X7-单根重 X7-Single weight | 0.452 | 0.566 | 0.433 | 0.467 | 0.483 | -0.250 | 1.000 | ||||
X8-根长 X8-Root length | -0.527 | -0.183 | -0.100 | 0.633 | 0.583 | 0.483 | 0.100 | 1.000 | |||
X9-根粗 X9-Root diameter | 0.134 | 0.456 | -0.267 | -0.283 | 0.117 | 0.217 | 0.300 | -0.167 | 1.000 | ||
X10-产量 X10-Yield | -0.126 | -0.128 | 0.717* | 0.667* | 0.033 | -0.533 | 0.483 | 0.017 | -0.267 | 1.000 | |
X11-阿魏酸含量 X11-Comparison of FA | 0.251 | 0.164 | -0.133 | -0.333 | -0.283 | 0.200 | -0.067 | -0.200 | 0.167 | -0.567 | 1.000 |
Table 5 Correlation analysis of single root fresh weight of A.sinensis seedlings and patent medicine
性状指标 indicators | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1-单根鲜重 X1-Single weight | 1.000 | ||||||||||
X2-早期抽薹率 X2-Earlier-bolting rate | 0.770* | 1.000 | |||||||||
X3-成活率 X3-transplant rate | 0.151 | 0.000 | 1.000 | ||||||||
X4-株高 X4-Plant height | -0.360 | -0.073 | 0.500 | 1.000 | |||||||
X5-株幅 X5-Plant length | 0.000 | 0.037 | -0.167 | 0.217 | 1.000 | ||||||
X6-叶片数 X6-Leaf number | -0.435 | -0.347 | -0.683* | -0.233 | 0.550 | 1.000 | |||||
X7-单根重 X7-Single weight | 0.452 | 0.566 | 0.433 | 0.467 | 0.483 | -0.250 | 1.000 | ||||
X8-根长 X8-Root length | -0.527 | -0.183 | -0.100 | 0.633 | 0.583 | 0.483 | 0.100 | 1.000 | |||
X9-根粗 X9-Root diameter | 0.134 | 0.456 | -0.267 | -0.283 | 0.117 | 0.217 | 0.300 | -0.167 | 1.000 | ||
X10-产量 X10-Yield | -0.126 | -0.128 | 0.717* | 0.667* | 0.033 | -0.533 | 0.483 | 0.017 | -0.267 | 1.000 | |
X11-阿魏酸含量 X11-Comparison of FA | 0.251 | 0.164 | -0.133 | -0.333 | -0.283 | 0.200 | -0.067 | -0.200 | 0.167 | -0.567 | 1.000 |
[1] | 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M] 一部. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015:133-134. |
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. The Chinese pharmacopoeia[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science Press, 2015:133-134. | |
[2] | 朱国庆. 甘肃中部当归生态气候分析及适生种植区划[J]. 甘肃气象, 2001, 19(1):36-38. |
ZHU Guoqing. Angelica ecological climmate analysis and being suitable to planting regionalization[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2001, 19(1):36-38. | |
[3] | 赵锐明, 陈垣, 郭凤霞, 等. 甘肃岷县野生当归资源分布特点及其与栽培当归生长特性的比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2):29-37. |
ZHAO Ruiming, CHENG Yuan, GUO Fengxia, et al. Comparative study on distributed feature of wild Angelica sinensis resources and the difference in growth characteristics with its cultivars native to Min County of Gansu[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 29-37. | |
[4] | 蔺海明, 邱黛玉, 陈垣. 当归苗根直径大小对提前抽薹率及产量的影响[J]. 中草药, 2007, 38(9):1386-1389. |
LIN Haiming, QIU Daiyu,. CHEN Yuan. Effect of root diameter on early bolting rate and yield in seedling of Angelica sinensis[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2007, 38(9):1386-1389. | |
[5] | 邱黛玉, 蔺海明, 方子森, 等. 种苗大小对当归成药期早期抽薹和生理变化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(6):100-105. |
QIU Daiyu, LIN Haiming, FANG Zisen, et al. Effect of Seedling size on Moss-pulling and Physiological changes of Angelica sinensis in early Stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(6):100-105. | |
[6] | 蔺海明, 鱼亚琼, 邱黛玉, 等. 种苗大小和外源激素对当归抽薹及产量构成的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(8):27-29. |
LIN Haiming, YU Yaqiong, QIU Daiyu, et al. Effect of seedling size and exogenous hormones on bolting and yield components of Angelica sinensis[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 38(8):27-29. | |
[7] |
杜弢, 郭增祥, 王惠珍, 等. 当归种苗等级与植株生物量积累及药材质量的关系[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2012, 37(19):2870-2874.
PMID |
DU Tao, GUO Zengxiang, WANG Huizhen, et al. Relationship between plant biomass accumulation and quality of Angelica sinensis[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2012, 37(19):2870-2874.
PMID |
|
[8] | 王国祥, 蔡子平, 王宏霞. 不同育苗方式对当归生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(2):198-200. |
WANG Guoxiang, CAI Ziping, WANG Hongxia. The growth and yield of Angelica seedling effected by different plant methods[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2013. 41(2): 198-200. | |
[9] | 白刚, 郭凤霞, 陈垣, 等. 岷县生荒地和熟地育成当归苗抗逆生理特性的差异[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11):86-95. |
BAI Gang, GUO Fengxia, CHEN Yuan, et al. Differences in physiological resistance traits of Angelica sinensis seedlings from uncultivated and cultivated fields in Min County[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11):86-95. | |
[10] | 孟玉, 郭增祥. 岷县当归育苗的调查与思考[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2008,(15):38-39. |
MENG Yu, GUO Zengxiang. The investigation and thoughts on Angelica sinensis seedling in Min County[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science ang Technology, 2008,(15):38-39. | |
[11] | 漆琚涛, 许彩荷, 郎建军, 等. 高寒阴湿区阴坡耕地当归育苗技术[J]. 中国种业, 2020,(3):76-78. |
QI Jutao, XU Caihe, LANG Jianjun, et al. Seedling raising technology of Angelica sinensis in the shade sloping farmland in cold and damp areas[J]. Chinese Seed Industry, 2020,(3):76-78. | |
[12] | 赵庆芳, 马世荣, 马瑞君, 等. 当归熟地育苗试验研究[J]. 中草药, 2005, 36(5):759-761. |
ZHAO Qinfang, MA Shirong, MA Ruijun, et al. Study on Angelica seedling in replanted field[J]. Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs, 2005, 36(5):759-761. | |
[13] | 武延安, 刘效瑞, 曹占凤, 等. 日光温室冬季育苗抑制当归早期抽薹的效应研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2010,(3):283-287. |
WU Yanan, LIU Xiaorui, CAO Zhanfeng, et al. Inhibitory Effect of Winter seedling in solar greenhouse on early Lichen extraction of Angelica sinensis[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2010,(3):283-287. | |
[14] | 武延安, 郭增祥, 曹占凤, 等. 当归日光温室冬季育苗技术[J]. 中国现代中药, 2014, 16(5):359-361. |
WU Yanan, GUO Zengxiang, CAO Zhanfeng, et al. Seedling raising technology of Angelica sinensis solar greenhouse in winter[J]. Chinese Modern Traditional Medicine, 2014, 16(5):359-361. | |
[15] | 马伟明, 郭凤霞, 陈垣, 等. 在不同茬口土地上的当归育苗研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2009, 34(5):552-553. |
MA Weiming, GUO Fengxia, CHEN Yuan, et al. Study on the seedling of Angelica sinensis on soil from different stubbles[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2009, 34(5):552-553. | |
[16] | 王小琴, 陈垣, 郭凤霞, 等. 药用作物茬口对当归苗栽生理生化特性的影响[J]. 中药材, 2017,(9):2002-2006. |
WANG Xiaoqing, CHEN Yuan, GUO Fengxia, et al. Effects of Medicinal Crop Stubbles on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Angelica sinensis Seedlings[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2017,(9):2002-2006. | |
[17] | BAI Gang, GUO Fengxia, CHEN Yuan, et al. Regulated effects of preceding crop on soil property and cultivating seedlings for Angelica sinensis on cultivated farmland[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(5):701-712. |
[18] | 梁伟, 郭凤霞, 陈垣, 等. 高寒区农茬口对当归田杂草群落特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(11):35-46. |
LIANG Wei, GUO Fengxia, CHEN Yuan, et al. Effects of crop stubble on weed community characteristics in Angelica sinensis fields in an alpine cold region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11):35-46. | |
[19] | 金彦博, 郭凤霞, 陈垣, 等. 岷县不同茬口对当归苗栽生长及抗病性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(4):69-78. |
JIN Yanbo, GUO Fengxia, CHEN Yuan, et al. Effect of various crop residues on growth and disease resistance of Angelica sinensis seedlings in Min County[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(4):69-78. | |
[20] | 吕文强, 党宏忠, 王立, 等. 黄土高原带状植被土壤理化性质空间分异特征[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10):21-30. |
LÜ Wenqiang, DANG Hongzhong, WANG Li, et al. The spatial differentiation of soil properties under banded vegetation systems on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(10):21-30. | |
[21] | 张晓磊, 刘晓静, 齐敏兴, 等. 混合盐碱对紫花苜蓿苗期根系特征的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(3):340-346. |
ZHANG Xiaolei, LIU Xiaojing, QI Minxing, et al. Alfalfa seedling root characteristics under complex saline-alkali stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(3):340-346. | |
[22] |
He J, Mchugh A D, Li H W, et al. Permanent raised beds improved soil structure andyield of spring wheat in arid northwestern China[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2012, 28(4):536-542.
DOI URL |
[23] | 王兴政, 蔺海明, 刘学周. 种苗大小对当归综合农艺性状及抽苔率的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2007,(5):59-63. |
WANG Xingzheng, LIN Haiming, LIU Xuezhou. Effect of seedling size on the comprehensive agricultural characteristics and bolting rate of Angelica sinensis[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2007,(5):59-63. |
[1] | ZHANG Junyao, WANG Jiayong, TANG Jianghua, LOU Shanwei, LI Wenshan, XU Wenxiu, MENG Lingyi, HE Hongtao, SANG Junmin. Effect of sowing period and density on growth and development and yield of Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 547-555. |
[2] | WANG Wentao, WU Bo, TAI Hongzhong, LIAN Wenming, DAI Cuirong, LI Shuangjiang, PU Yanmei. Effects of different sowing dates on cotton growth in aral reclamation area, Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422. |
[3] | FU Yongqiang, ZHANG Yongxia, LONG Zaijun, RAN Hui, Aimaieraili Tuheti. Study on Suitable Sowing Date and Rate of Interplanting Rape with Green Manure in Orchards [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1864-1870. |
[4] | LIU Taijie, LIU Jintao, WAN Sumei, ZHAO Xinxin, FEN Lu, LI Yabing, DU Wenli, WANG Guoping, CHEN Guodong, WU Quanzhong. Effects of Variety and Sowing Date on Cotton Growth, Yield and Cotton Boll Spatial Distribution in Wheat-Cotton Intercropping [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8): 1382-1391. |
[5] | FAN Xiaofang, SUO Changkai, CHU Xuan, WANG Luxia, YE Jun, DOU Hao, WANG Yuming. Effects of Sowing Dates and Plastic Film Mulching on Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Upland Rice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(3): 412-418. |
[6] | ZHAN Changgui, SUN Ting, WANG Jichuan, GAO Zhen, LI Tongrui, Reyanaimu Aximu. Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat under Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 1971-1980. |
[7] | Adili Abulaiti, JIA Kai, ZHANG Ni, LUO Yanmei, XU Hao, MA Lina, GAO Jie. Effects of Different Sowing Dates in Autumn on the Growth, Development and Quality of Overwintering Spinach in Open Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9): 1697-1703. |
[8] | SUI Long-long, TIAN Jing-shan, ZHANG Xu-yi, ZHAO Bao-gai, XIANG Dao, ZHANG Wang-feng. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Boll Weight and Fiber Quality of Top Boll of Cotton under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(7): 1194-1202. |
[9] | WU Bo, LIAN Wen-ming,YU Shu-xun,MAO Shu-chun, LI Ke-fu,LI Wei-ping. Effects of Different Varieties, Densities and Sowing Dates on Cotton of No-Mulching Drip-Irrigated Cultivation in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(3): 393-404. |
[10] | YIN Peng, DING Xin-hua, FU Kai-yun, Tursun Ahmat, HE Jiang, Talim Zeynelbek, Maryam Mamat, Tawakul Osman, GUO Wen-chao, LIU Wen. Effects of Sowing Date on Arthropod Community Structure in Fresh Corn Fields in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(9): 1659-1669. |
[11] | WANG Ji-chuan;XU Ya-li;GU Lei;Aimerjiang · Wusiman. Effect of Different Sowing Dates on Material Distribution and Yield Formation of Hybrid Cotton in Southern Xinjiang [J]. , 2015, 52(7): 1209-1215. |
[12] | . Effects of Sowing Date on Photosynthetic Production and Yield of Hybrid Cotton Material under Different Plant Models [J]. , 2015, 52(11): 1961-1968. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 49
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 180
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||