新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2318-2323.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.028
• 畜牧兽医·农业装备工程与机械化·农业经济 • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:
2021-11-10
出版日期:
2022-09-20
发布日期:
2023-01-16
通信作者:
曾献存(1981-),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为动物遗传育种与繁殖,(E-mail)zengxiancun@163.com作者简介:
陈锡(1996-),女,四川德阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物遗传育种与繁殖,(E-mail)707315351@qq.com
基金资助:
CHEN Xi(), ZENG Xiancun(
), HU Bo, LIU Tong, DAI Liying, NAN Shanshan
Received:
2021-11-10
Published:
2022-09-20
Online:
2023-01-16
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】 研究单宁添加剂对育肥羊生产性能、血液生化指标和养分消化率的影响。【方法】 选择30只五月龄,体重为25~30 kg的育肥羊随机分成3组,每组10个重复。分别是空白对照组:A组,饲喂基础日粮;试验组:B组在基础日粮中添加10 g/d单宁,C组在基础日粮中添加15 g/d单宁。试验预饲期为7 d,正饲期为42 d,整个试验周期为 49 d。饲喂结束后,检测其生长性能、相关血清生化指标和营养物质表观消化率。【结果】 B组和C组的日增重都高于A组;与A组相比,B组和C组的谷丙转氨酶水平显著提高(P<0.05);B组和C组的总蛋白、白蛋白、球蛋白、肌酐和葡萄糖等血清生化指标均无显著影响;与A组相比,B组的碱性磷酸酶含量显著提高(P<0.05),C组差异不显著;B组的粗蛋白表观消化率低于A、C两组(P>0.05),干物质、粗脂肪、钙和NDF等的表观消化率均无显著差异。【结论】 在育肥羊日粮中添加10、15 g/d单宁添加剂可以改善育肥羊的生产性能,对谷丙转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、尿素和粗蛋白含量的影响较大。
中图分类号:
陈锡, 曾献存, 胡波, 刘彤, 戴丽颖, 南珊珊. 单宁添加剂对育肥羊生产性能、血清生化指标和养分消化率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2318-2323.
CHEN Xi, ZENG Xiancun, HU Bo, LIU Tong, DAI Liying, NAN Shanshan. Effects of Tannin Additive on Performance and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Fattening Sheep[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2318-2323.
项目 Item | 含量 Content |
---|---|
原料组成Raw material composition/% | |
玉米Corn | 56.5 |
棉粕Cottonseed meal | 8 |
麸皮bran | 10 |
豆粕Soybean meal | 6 |
石粉Stone powder | 0.5 |
食盐salt | 1 |
苜蓿干草alfalfahay | 16 |
预混料①Premix | 2 |
合计Total | 100 |
营养成分②Nutrients | |
粗蛋白质Crude protein(%) | 15.62 |
消化能Digestible energy(MJ/kg) | 12.64 |
钙Ca(%) | 0.52 |
磷P(%) | 0.37 |
表 1 日粮组成及营养水平
Table 1 Dietary composition and nutritional level
项目 Item | 含量 Content |
---|---|
原料组成Raw material composition/% | |
玉米Corn | 56.5 |
棉粕Cottonseed meal | 8 |
麸皮bran | 10 |
豆粕Soybean meal | 6 |
石粉Stone powder | 0.5 |
食盐salt | 1 |
苜蓿干草alfalfahay | 16 |
预混料①Premix | 2 |
合计Total | 100 |
营养成分②Nutrients | |
粗蛋白质Crude protein(%) | 15.62 |
消化能Digestible energy(MJ/kg) | 12.64 |
钙Ca(%) | 0.52 |
磷P(%) | 0.37 |
项目 Item | 试验组别 Test group | ||
---|---|---|---|
A组 Group A | B组 Group B | C组 Group C | |
初始重Initial weight(kg) | 28.71±2.06 | 29.71±1.89 | 30.29±2.98 |
末重Final weight(kg) | 35.1±1.85 | 36.14±3.18 | 37.4±3.02 |
日增重ADG(g/d) | 152±15.14 | 153±38.69 | 169±13.62 |
日采食量ADFI(kg/d) | 1.81±0.29 | 2.05±0.22 | 2.06±0.5 |
料重比F/G | 11.86±0.87 | 11.58±0.62 | 11.55±0.74 |
表 2 不同单宁添加剂下育肥羊生长性能变化
Table 2 Effect of Tannin Additives on Growth Performance of Fattening Sheep
项目 Item | 试验组别 Test group | ||
---|---|---|---|
A组 Group A | B组 Group B | C组 Group C | |
初始重Initial weight(kg) | 28.71±2.06 | 29.71±1.89 | 30.29±2.98 |
末重Final weight(kg) | 35.1±1.85 | 36.14±3.18 | 37.4±3.02 |
日增重ADG(g/d) | 152±15.14 | 153±38.69 | 169±13.62 |
日采食量ADFI(kg/d) | 1.81±0.29 | 2.05±0.22 | 2.06±0.5 |
料重比F/G | 11.86±0.87 | 11.58±0.62 | 11.55±0.74 |
项目 Item | 试验组别 Test group | ||
---|---|---|---|
A组 Group A | B组 Group B | C组 Group C | |
谷丙转氨酶Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase(U/L) | 16.59±3.3b | 22.04±3.16a | 21.55±2.46a |
总蛋白Total protein(g/L) | 69.63±4.45 | 70.91±4.55 | 72.08±2.48 |
白蛋白Albumin(g/L) | 35.53±2.74 | 37.16±1.60 | 36.45±1.81 |
球蛋白Globulin(g/L) | 34.10±3.27 | 33.89±4.54 | 35.63±3.00 |
谷草转氨酶Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(U/L) | 91.81±18.62 | 104.21±23.69 | 103.97±13.68 |
碱性磷酸酶Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 263.86±86.69b | 327.86±78.86a | 273.83±65.97b |
尿素Urea(mmol/L) | 3.91±0.82c | 4.69±0.51b | 5.60±0.49a |
肌酐Creatinine(umol/L) | 50.71±4.89 | 53.57±8.24 | 47.83±6.43 |
葡萄糖Glucose(mmol/L) | 5.23±1.61 | 7.06±1.55 | 6.60±1.83 |
甘油三酯Triglyceride(mmol/L) | 0.30±0.08ab | 0.34±0.06a | 0.25±0.07b |
表 3 不同单宁添加剂下育肥羊血清生化指标变化
Table 3 Effect of tannin additive on serum biochemical indexes of fattening sheep
项目 Item | 试验组别 Test group | ||
---|---|---|---|
A组 Group A | B组 Group B | C组 Group C | |
谷丙转氨酶Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase(U/L) | 16.59±3.3b | 22.04±3.16a | 21.55±2.46a |
总蛋白Total protein(g/L) | 69.63±4.45 | 70.91±4.55 | 72.08±2.48 |
白蛋白Albumin(g/L) | 35.53±2.74 | 37.16±1.60 | 36.45±1.81 |
球蛋白Globulin(g/L) | 34.10±3.27 | 33.89±4.54 | 35.63±3.00 |
谷草转氨酶Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(U/L) | 91.81±18.62 | 104.21±23.69 | 103.97±13.68 |
碱性磷酸酶Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 263.86±86.69b | 327.86±78.86a | 273.83±65.97b |
尿素Urea(mmol/L) | 3.91±0.82c | 4.69±0.51b | 5.60±0.49a |
肌酐Creatinine(umol/L) | 50.71±4.89 | 53.57±8.24 | 47.83±6.43 |
葡萄糖Glucose(mmol/L) | 5.23±1.61 | 7.06±1.55 | 6.60±1.83 |
甘油三酯Triglyceride(mmol/L) | 0.30±0.08ab | 0.34±0.06a | 0.25±0.07b |
项目Item | 实验组别 Test group | ||
---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | B组 Group B | C组 Group C | |
干物质Dry matter (%) | 59.46±3.36 | 58.87±3.26 | 59.84±3.24 |
粗蛋白Crude protein(%) | 60.19±2.78 | 59.29±3.17 | 60.03±3.57 |
粗脂肪Ether extract(%) | 54.25±2.69 | 53.74±2.74 | 54.62±2.33 |
钙Ca(%) | 20.45±3.72 | 18.34±4.35 | 18.65±3.53 |
磷P(%) | 31.47±3.78 | 31.51±2.56 | 32.23±3.57 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF(%) | 53.74±3.47 | 49.62±4.27 | 51.28±2.75 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF(%) | 41.31±3.23 | 39.54±5.77 | 42.95±4.23 |
表 4 不同单宁添加剂下育肥羊营养物质表观消化率变化
Table 4 Effect of Tannin Additives on Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients in Fattening Sheep
项目Item | 实验组别 Test group | ||
---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | B组 Group B | C组 Group C | |
干物质Dry matter (%) | 59.46±3.36 | 58.87±3.26 | 59.84±3.24 |
粗蛋白Crude protein(%) | 60.19±2.78 | 59.29±3.17 | 60.03±3.57 |
粗脂肪Ether extract(%) | 54.25±2.69 | 53.74±2.74 | 54.62±2.33 |
钙Ca(%) | 20.45±3.72 | 18.34±4.35 | 18.65±3.53 |
磷P(%) | 31.47±3.78 | 31.51±2.56 | 32.23±3.57 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF(%) | 53.74±3.47 | 49.62±4.27 | 51.28±2.75 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF(%) | 41.31±3.23 | 39.54±5.77 | 42.95±4.23 |
[1] | 樊慧丽, 付文阁. 我国羊肉市场价格波动分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020,(10):1-6. |
FAN Huili, FU Wenge. Analysis of Market Price Fluctuation of Lamb in China[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry Veterinarian, 2020,(10):1-6. | |
[2] | 周艳华, 巩月新, 刘国明. 浅谈圈养育肥羊的发展前景[J]. 吉林畜牧兽医, 2019, 40(2):38,40. |
ZHOU Yanhua, GONG Xinyue, LIU Guoming. Development Prospect of Raising Fattening Sheep in Pens[J]. Jilin animal husbandry veterinarian, 2019, 40(2):38,40. | |
[3] | Yi M L, Ping X, et al. Tannins and nitrogen dynamics in mangrove leaves at different age and decay stages(Jiulong River Estuary,China)[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2007, 538(1):285-295. |
[4] | 瞿王龙, 杨小鹏, 张存涛, 等. 干旱、半干旱地区天然草原灌木及其肥岛效应研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):201-207. |
QU Wanglong, YANG Xiaopeng, ZHANG Cuntao, et al. Research Progress on Natural Grassland Shrub and Its Fertilizer Island Effect in Arid and Semi-arid Areas[J]. Journal of Grass Industry, 2015, 24(4):201-207. | |
[5] | QIAN qianHuang, XIU liLiu, GUO qiZhao, TIAN mingHu, YU xi Wang. Potential and challenges of tannins as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics for farm animal production[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2018, 4(2). |
[6] |
Byeng R.Min, Sandra Solaiman, Heidi M.Waldrip, David Parker, Richard W.Todd, DavidBrauer. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2020, 6(3):231-246.
DOI PMID |
[7] | Wang Y, Mcallister T A, Acharya S. Condensed Tannins in Sainfoin: Composition, Concentration, and Effects on Nutritive and Feeding Value of SainfoinForage[J]. Crop Science, 2015, 55(1). |
[8] |
H, Ben, Salem, et al. Effect of early experience and adaptation period on voluntary intake, digestion, and growth in Barbarine lambs given tannin-containing(Acacia cyanophyllaLindl. foliage) or tannin-free (oaten hay) diets[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2005, 122(1-2):59-77.
DOI URL |
[9] | Tiemann T T, Lascano C E, Wettstein H R, et al. Effect of the tropical tannin-rich shrub legumes Calliandracalothyrsus and Flemingiamacrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and ener gy balance in growing lambs[J]. ANIMAL-CAMBRIDGE UNIVER SITY PRESS-, 2008, 2(5):790-799. |
[10] | 杨镒峰, 魏海军. 单宁对反刍动物影响的研究进展[J]. 特产研究, 2010, 32(1):60-64. |
YANG Yifeng, WEI Haijun. Research Progress on Effects of Tannin on Ruminants[J]. Specialty Research, 2010, 32(1):60-64. | |
[11] | Min B R, Barry T N, Attwood G T, et al. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review[J]. Animal Feed ence& Technology, 2003, 106(1-4):3-19. |
[12] |
YU xi, WANG, and, et al. Frothy bloat in ruminants: Cause, occurrence, and mitigation strategies[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2012, 172(1-2):103-114.
DOI URL |
[13] | WANG Y, Douglas G B, Waghorn G C, et al. Effect of condensed tannins in Lotus corniculatus upon lactation performance in ewes[J]. Journal of Agricultural ence, 1996, 1269(3):353-362. |
[14] | T, N, Barry. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 1986,(55):123—137. |
[15] | 刘立成, 刘娣, 邹红菲, 等. 单宁酸对奶牛生产性能及甲烷排放的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2014, 35(17):108- 111. |
LIU Licheng, LIU di, ZHOU Hongfei, et al. Effects of Tannic Acid on Production Performance and Methane Emission of Dairy Cows[J]. Feed industry, 2014, 35(17):108- 111. | |
[16] | 卢珍珍, 郑琛, 李发弟, 李冲, 等. 葡萄渣对羔羊生产性能、屠宰性能和养分消化代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4): 114-120. |
LU Zhenzhen, ZHEN Chen, LI Fadi, et al. Effects of grape residue on lamb performance, slaughter performance and nutrient digestion and metabolism[J]. Journal of Grass Industry, 2015, 24(4): 114-120. | |
[17] |
Rivera-Méndez C, PlascenciaA, Torrentera N, et al. Effect of level and source of supplemental tannin on growth performance of steers during the late finishing phase[J]. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2017, 45(1):199-203.
DOI URL |
[18] | 郝科兴. 日粮消化能水平对育肥猪生长性能和血液生化指标的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
HAO Kexin. Effects of Dietary Digestive Energy Levels on Growth Performance and Blood Biochemical Parameters in Fattening Pigs[D]. Shi hezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
[19] | Lucianer E, Silva A S D, Cazarotto C J, et al. Addition of Tannin in Lamb Diets after Weaning: Impact on Performance and Hematological and Biochemical Variables[J]. ActaentiaeVeterinariae, 2019, 47(1). |
[20] | 任慧波, 单安山, 张永根. 反刍动物过瘤胃蛋白的保护措施[J]. 黄牛杂志, 2003,(4):32-34. |
REN Huibo, SHAN Anshan, ZHANG Yonggen. Protective Measures of Rumen Protein in Ruminants[J]. Cattle Magazine, 2003,(4):32-34. | |
[21] | 郭冬生. 反刍动物蛋白质评定体系研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2004(2):5-7,10. |
GUO Dongsheng. Progress in Ruminant Protein Evaluation System[J]. Chinese Feed, 2004(2):5-7+10. | |
[22] | 张晓庆. 红豆草中单宁对饲粮蛋白质保护的效果[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005. |
ZHANG Xiaoqing. Protective Effect of Tannin in Red Bean Cao on Dietary Protein[D]. Lan zhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2005. | |
[23] | 王敬尧. 单宁对绵羊瘤胃发酵参数、营养物质消化率和甲烷排放量的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019. |
WANG Jingyao. Effects of Tannin on Rumen Fermentation Parameters, Nutrient Digestibility and Methane Emission in Sheep. Hothot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[24] |
Tseu R J, Junior F P, Carvalho R F, et al. Effect of tannins and monensin on feeding behaviour, feed intake, digestive parameters and microbial efficiency of nellore cows[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 19(1):262-273.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Patra A K, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2011, 91(1):24-37.
DOI PMID |
[1] | 刘晶, 杜明川, 张文婷, 鲍海娟, 景美玲, 杜文华. 青海不同地区小黑麦种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[2] | 赵晨, 王彦, 阿不夏合满·穆巴拉克, 秦荣艳, 陈翔宇, 梁见弟, 王乐乐, 张志军, 王承敏, 王文奇, 沙丽塔娜提. 复合添加剂对冷季绵羊瘤胃发酵及养分表观消化率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2054-2062. |
[3] | 付东青, 王彦超, 毛家乡, 杨帆, 宋磊, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 山区旱作条件下不同燕麦品种品质分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 344-352. |
[4] | 关景林, 郭腾达, 陈勇臻, 刘金铄, 石乐天, 张光辉, 陈鹏举. 不同蛋白源对爱拔益家肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2734-2741. |
[5] | 黄新新, 李晓斌, 李海, 李璇玥, 李倩, 马利鑫, 陈晖, 马玉辉. 不同品种1岁青年马血清生化指标的比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1740-1746. |
[6] | 张俊瑜, 郭同军, 桑断疾, 王文奇, 张志军, 王承敏. 饲粮中不同棉秆比例对绵羊瘤胃发酵参数和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 383-392. |
[7] | 王彦超, 宋磊, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 孙艳梅, 马春晖. 不同燕麦品种生育期农艺性状、生产性能及品质的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(2): 254-263. |
[8] | 彭箫, 姚莹莹, 王小刚, 方书宝, 王俊花, 吴盈萍, 阿依多来提·托合提, 艾克迪·克里马洪, 米热扎提·买买提, 李海英. 发酵饲料对京红蛋鸡产蛋后期生产性能、血清参数及脂代谢的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(10): 1931-1939. |
[9] | 邹琳,哈丽代·热合木江,艾比布拉·伊马木. 棉茬地放牧对新疆山羊生产性能及组织结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(8): 1551-1559. |
[10] | 史章景, 李莹雪, 刘艳丰, 刘武军, 杨会国, 潘昱麒. 不同秸秆源NDF对巴什拜羊生产性能、器官发育和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(7): 1343-1349. |
[11] | 陈程, 肖非, 韩坤, 聂存喜, 梁静, 张文举. 复合非淀粉多糖酶对海兰褐蛋鸡生产性能及营养物质代谢率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(5): 966-973. |
[12] | 张前兵;于磊;鲁为华;马春晖;和海秀. 保护播种对滴灌苜蓿种植当年第一茬草生产性能的影响[J]. , 2017, 54(4): 735-741. |
[13] | 马军;郑伟;朱婧蓉;张博;加孜依拉·哈勒克. 燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播草地不同刈割时期生产性能的对比分析[J]. , 2015, 52(8): 1547-1554. |
[14] | 王文奇;罗永明;刘艳丰;夏合曼;王世昌;侯广田. 不同棉秆水平全混合日粮对绵羊生长性能和瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J]. , 2015, 52(11): 2111-2116. |
[15] | 李海英;张俐华;翟卫爽;李晓斌;杨开伦. 丁酸钠替代饲用抗生素对白羽肉仔鸡生产性能和免疫器官指数的影响[J]. , 2014, 51(4): 755-760. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 47
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 192
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||