不同郁闭度天山云杉林土壤养分特征

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.016

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (9): 2216-2222.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.016

• 园艺特产·贮藏保鲜加工·林业 • 上一篇下一篇

不同郁闭度天山云杉林土壤养分特征

席丽(), 李思瑶, 夏晓莹, 陈玉雯, 李林, 王杰, 马小龙, 米尔扎提·柯尼加里木, 阿丽耶·麦麦提, 王卫霞()

新疆农业大学林学与风景园林学院/新疆教育厅干旱区林业生态与产业技术重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2022-12-04 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-19
通信作者: 王卫霞(1981-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,副教授,研究方向为森林生态与经营,(E-mail)wangweixia0993@163.com
作者简介:席丽(1997-),甘肃陇西人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林生态与经营,(E-mail)193848534@qq.com
基金资助:
国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“不同海拔梯度对天山云杉林土壤有机碳的影响”(202110758008);国家自然科学基金项目“南疆盆地不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳库的影响”(31760199)

Study on soil nutrient characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. Tianschanica forest with different canopy densities

XI Li(), LI Siyao, XIA Xiaoying, CHEN Yuwen, LI Lin, WANG Jie, MA Xiaolong, Mierzhati Kenijialimu, Aliye Maimaiti, WANG Weixia()

Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecology and Industrial Technology in Arid Area, Xinjiang Education Department/College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2022-12-04 Published:2023-09-20 Online:2023-09-19
Supported by:
National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project“Effects of Different Elevation Gradients on Soil Organic Carbon in Picea schrenkiana Forest”(202110758008);National Natural Science Foundation “Effects of Different Land Use Types on Soil Organic Carbon in Southern Xinjiang Basin”(31760199)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同郁闭度下天山云杉林土壤养分特征,为天山云杉林的可持续经营提供理论依据。【方法】以不同郁闭度的天山云杉林为研究对象,采用野外样地调查和室内土壤测定分析相结合方法,分析不同郁闭度对天山云杉林土壤养分特征的影响。【结果】(1) 不同郁闭度天山云杉林土壤养分均为中等变异性,具有明显的聚表性,主要集中在0~20 cm土层。(2) 0~20 cm土层土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、全氮含量均随郁闭度的增大呈递增的趋势,其中土壤有机质和全氮含量增加显著(P<0.05);20~60 cm土层土壤各养分含量随郁闭度变化其变化趋势不一致且均无显著差异。整个土壤剖面上天山云杉林郁闭度达到0.8时更有利于土壤养分的积累。(3) 土壤各养分之间均存在正相关关系,其中有机质与碱解氮、速效磷、全氮两两之间呈极显著正相关。【结论】郁闭度对天山云杉林表层土壤有机质、全氮有显著影响(P<0.05),郁闭度0.8条件下更有利于天山云杉林土壤养分的积累。

关键词: 郁闭度; 天山云杉林; 土壤养分

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the characteristics of soil nutrients in Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest under different canopy densities in the hope of providing a theoretical basis for the sustainable management of the forest.【Methods】 Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest with different canopy densities were taken as the research object, the effects of different canopy densities on Soil Nutrient Characteristics of the forest were analyzed and discussed by combining field sample investigation and indoor soil measurement and analysis.【Results】 (1)The soil nutrients of Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest with different canopy density showed medium variability and obvious surface aggregation, mainly concentrated in 0-20 cm soil layer.(2) The contents of soil organic matter, alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus and total nitrogen in 0-20 cm soil layer increased with the increase of canopy density, and the contents of soil organic matter and total nitrogen increased significantly (P<0.05); The variation trend of soil nutrient content in 20-60 cm soil layer with canopy density was inconsistent and had no significant difference.In the whole soil profile, when the canopy density of Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest reached 0.8, it was more conducive to the accumulation of soil nutrients.(3) There was a positive correlation between soil nutrients, and there was a very significant positive correlation between organic matter and alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus and total nitrogen.【Conclusion】 Canopy density has a significant effect on surface soil organic matter and total nitrogen of Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest(P<0.05).Canopy density of 0.8 is more conducive to soil nutrient accumulation of Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest.

Key words: canopy density; Picea schrenkiana var.tianschanica forest; soil nutrient

中图分类号:

S757
S153

席丽, 李思瑶, 夏晓莹, 陈玉雯, 李林, 王杰, 马小龙, 米尔扎提·柯尼加里木, 阿丽耶·麦麦提, 王卫霞. 不同郁闭度天山云杉林土壤养分特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2216-2222.

XI Li, LI Siyao, XIA Xiaoying, CHEN Yuwen, LI Lin, WANG Jie, MA Xiaolong, Mierzhati Kenijialimu, Aliye Maimaiti, WANG Weixia. Study on soil nutrient characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. Tianschanica forest with different canopy densities[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2216-2222.

图/表 5

参考文献 25

[1]	刘靖朝. 土壤养分的空间变异特征对人为干扰的响应及其光谱反演[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2018.
	LIU Jingchao. The spatial variation characteristics of soil nutrients are responsive to human interference and its spectral inversion[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2018.
[2]	陈志颖, 阮晓, 张玉竹, 等. 3,4-二羟基苯乙酮胁迫对天山云杉种子萌发过程中内源植物激素含量变化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(12): 1114-1122. DOI
	CHEN Zhiying, RUAN Xiao, ZHANG Yuzhu, et al. Effects of 3,4-dihydroxyacetophenone stress on changes of endogenous plant hormone content during seed germination of Picea Tianshan[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(12): 1114-1122.
[3]	Chen S, Lin B W, Li Y Q, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of soil properties and soil fertility evaluation in a large grain-production area of subtropical plain, China[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 357: 113937. DOI URL
[4]	丁继伟, 张芸香, 郭跃东, 等. 华北落叶松天然林密度对林下植被物种组成和多样性的影响研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(4): 10-16.
	DING Jiwei, ZHANG Yunxiang, GUO Yuedong, et al. Influences of the density on under story species composition and diversity of Larixprincipis-rupprechtii natural forest[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(4): 10-16.
[5]	冯宜明, 李毅, 曹秀文, 等. 甘肃亚高山云杉人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能对林分密度的响应特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1529-1541. DOI
	FENG Yiming, LI Yi, CAO Xiuwen, et al. Effects of stand density on soil properties and water conservation function of Piceaasperata plantation in the subalpine region of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(9): 1529-1541. DOI
[6]	胡小燕, 段爱国, 张建国, 等. 南亚热带杉木人工成熟林密度对土壤养分效应研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(3): 15-23.
	HU Xiaoyan, DUAN Aiguo, ZHANG Jianguo, et al. Effect of stand density on soil nutrient of Chinese fir mature plantations in South Asia Subtropical Zone[J]. Forest Research, 2018, 31(3): 15-23.
[7]	黄智军, 刘青青, 颜耀, 等. 不同郁闭度马尾松林土壤元素生态化学计量特征[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2021, 41(5): 456-463.
	HUANG Zhijun, LIU Qingqing, YAN Yao, et al. Soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ecological stoichiometry in Pinusmassoniana plantations with various canopy densities[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2021, 41(5): 456-463.
[8]	魏大平. 郁闭度控制对马尾松人工林化学计量特征及养分再吸收率的影响[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2017.
	WEI Daping. Effects of canopy density control on stoichiometric characteristics and nutrient absorption of Pinusmassoniana plantation[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2017.
[9]	谢锦, 常顺利, 张毓涛, 等. 天山北坡中段云杉林地表水氮磷含量特征[J]. 山地学报, 2017, 35(6): 808-815.
	XIE Jin, CHANG Shunli, ZHANG Yutao, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus content in surface water of spruce forest land in the middle section of the north slope of Tianshan Mountain[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017, 35(6): 808-815.
[10]	李海军, 张毓涛, 张新平, 等. 天山中部天然云杉林森林生态系统降水过程中的水质变化[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(18): 4828-4838.
	LI Haijun, ZHANG Yutao, ZHANG Xinping, et al. Water quality changes during precipitation in Natural Spruce Forest Ecosystem in Central Tianshan[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2010, 30(18): 4828-4838.
[11]	孙雪娇, 李吉玫, 张毓涛, 等. 天山北坡山地森林林地产流产沙特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1821-1830. DOI
	SUN Xuejiao, LI Jimei, ZHANG Yutao, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of runoff and sediment in mountain forest on the north slope of Tianshan Mountain[J]. Journal of Ecological Environment, 2021, 30(9): 1821-1830.
[12]	王千军, 张毓涛, 李吉玫, 等. 天山云杉林生态系统健康评估中林下土壤指标筛选及综合指数的研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2012, 18(12): 26-30.
	WANG Qianjun, ZHANG Yutao, LI Jimei, et al. Study on selection of understory soil index and comprehensive index in ecosystem health assessment of spruce forest in Tianshan Mountain[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 18(12): 26-30.
[13]	漆良华, 张旭东, 周金星, 等. 湘西北小流域不同植被恢复区土壤微生物数量、生物量碳氮及其分形特征[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(8): 14-20.
	QI Lianghua, ZHANG Xudong, ZHOU Jinxing, et al. Soil microbial quantity, biomass carbon and nitrogen and their fractal characteristics in different vegetation restoration areas of small watershed in Northwest Hunan[J]. Forestry Science, 2009, 45(8): 14-20.
[14]	邵方丽, 余新晓, 杨志坚, 等. 北京山区典型森林土壤的养分空间变异与环境因子的关系[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2012, 20(4): 581-591.
	SHAO Fangli, YU Xinxiao, YANG Zhijian, et al. Relationship between spatial variation of nutrients in typical forest soils and environmental factors in mountainous areas of Beijing[J]. Journal of Applied Basic and Engineering Sciences, 2012, 20(4): 581-591.
[15]	陈庆强, 沈承德, 孙彦敏, 等. 鼎湖山土壤有机质深度分布的剖面演化机制[J]. 土壤学报, 2005, 4(1): 1-8.
	CHEN Qinqiang, SHEN Chengde, SUN Yanmin, et al. Profile evolution mechanism of depth distribution of soil organic matter in Dinghu Mountain[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 4 (1): 1-8.
[16]	马云波, 许中旗, 张岩, 等. 冀北山区华北落叶松人工林对土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(4): 165-170.
	MA Yunbo, XU Zhongqi, ZHANG Yan, et al. Effects of Larixprincipisrupprechtii plantation on soil chemical properties in mountainous area of northern Hebei[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(4): 165-170.
[17]	姚小兰, 郝建锋, 伍炫蓓, 等. 川北白云山地区不同密度下亮叶桦人工林群落结构和物种多样性[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(4): 95-102.
	YAO Xiaolan, HAO Jianfeng, WU Xuanpei, et al. Community structure and species diversity of Betulaluminifera plantation under different densities in Baiyun Mountain Area of northern Sichuan[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(4): 95-102.
[18]	邹佳何, 王海燕, 张美娜, 等. 温带云冷杉针阔混交林土壤养分的空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(6): 1554-1562.
	ZOU Jiahe, WANG Haiyan, ZHANG Meina, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil nutrients in temperate spruce fir coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest[J]. Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(6): 1554-1562.
[19]	张洪亮, 朱建雯, 张新平, 等. 天山中部不同郁闭度天然云杉林立地土壤养分的比较研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2010, 33(1): 15-18.
	ZHANG Hongliang, ZHU Jianwen, ZHANG Xinping, et al. Comparative study on Soil Nutrients of natural spruce stands with different canopy density in the middle of Tianshan Mountain[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2010, 33(1): 15-18.
[20]	曾全超, 李鑫, 董扬红, 等. 陕北黄土高原土壤性质及其生态化学计量的纬度变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(5): 870-879. DOI
	ZENG Quanchao, LI Xin, DONG Yanghong, et al. Latitudinal variation characteristics of soil properties and eco stoichiometry in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(5): 870-879. DOI
[21]	Bai Y F, Chen S Y, Shi S R, et al. Effects of different management approaches on the stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N, and P in a mature Chinese fir plantation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 723: 137868. DOI URL
[22]	齐鹏, 刘贤德, 赵维俊, 等. 祁连山中段青海云杉林土壤养分特征[J]. 山地学报, 2015, 33(5): 538-545.
	QI Peng, LIU Xiande, ZHAO Weijun, et al. Soil nutrient characteristics of Qinghai Spruce Forest in the middle part of Qilian Mountains[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015, 33(5): 538-545.
[23]	王国宏. 中国云杉林[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
	WANG Guohong. Chinese Spruce Forest[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[24]	李路, 常亚鹏, 许仲林. 天山雪岭云杉林土壤CNP化学计量特征随水热梯度的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(22): 8139-8148.
	LI Lu, CHANG Yaping, XU Zhonglin. Variation of soil CNP stoichiometric characteristics with hydrothermal gradient in Xueling spruce forest, Tianshan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(22): 8139-8148.
[25]	王海燕, 雷相东, 张会儒, 等. 近天然落叶松云冷杉林土壤有机碳研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(3): 11-16.
	WANG Haiyan, LEI Xiangdong, ZHANG Huiru, et al. Study on soil organic carbon of near natural Larch spruce fir forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31 (3): 11-16.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	5	0	0	45

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	25	25
比例	50%	50%

摘要

166

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	166

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	62	104
比例	37%	63%

郁闭度 Canopy density		海拔 Aititude (m)	坡度 Slope gradient	坡向 Slope direction	坡位 Slope position	龄组 Stand age
0.2	Ⅰ	2 070	28	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	2 001	20	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	2 017	29	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
0.4	Ⅰ	2 099	25	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	1 990	28	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	1 911	25	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
0.6	Ⅰ	2 067	24	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	1 972	22	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	1 944	19	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
0.8	Ⅰ	1 947	24	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	1 970	27	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	1 949	21	阴坡	上坡	中龄林

郁闭度 Canopy density		海拔 Aititude (m)	坡度 Slope gradient	坡向 Slope direction	坡位 Slope position	龄组 Stand age
0.2	Ⅰ	2 070	28	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	2 001	20	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	2 017	29	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
0.4	Ⅰ	2 099	25	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	1 990	28	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	1 911	25	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
0.6	Ⅰ	2 067	24	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	1 972	22	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	1 944	19	阴坡	中坡	中龄林
0.8	Ⅰ	1 947	24	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅱ	1 970	27	阴坡	上坡	中龄林
	Ⅲ	1 949	21	阴坡	上坡	中龄林

土层 Soil depth	指标 Index	极小值 Min	极大值 Max	均值 Mean	标准差 SD	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis	K-S Sig	变异系数 CV(%)
0~20 cm	有机质(g/kg)	57.54	248.09	154.03	58.56	-0.03	-1.02	0.20	38
	碱解氮(mg/kg)	65.06	189.35	106.25	37.43	1.22	1.04	0.19	35
	速效磷(mg/kg)	14.34	30.64	23.36	5.89	-0.15	-1.52	0.18	25
	速效钾(mg/kg)	109.16	186.22	138.12	21.82	1.26	1.30	0.13	16
	全氮(g/kg)	1.65	6.77	4.59	1.52	-0.38	-0.42	0.20	33
20~60cm	有机质(g/kg)	22.29	77.96	38.78	18.39	1.18	0.36	0.20	47
	碱解氮(mg/kg)	22.07	78.38	47.12	19.79	0.08	-1.53	0.20	42
	速效磷(mg/kg)	5.60	28.28	13.65	7.61	1.10	-0.26	0.20	56
	速效钾(mg/kg)	74.92	142.25	115.00	17.82	-0.69	1.25	0.20	15
	全氮(g/kg)	0.70	2.20	1.24	0.50	0.59	-0.71	0.20	40

土层 Soil depth	指标 Index	极小值 Min	极大值 Max	均值 Mean	标准差 SD	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis	K-S Sig	变异系数 CV(%)
0~20 cm	有机质(g/kg)	57.54	248.09	154.03	58.56	-0.03	-1.02	0.20	38
	碱解氮(mg/kg)	65.06	189.35	106.25	37.43	1.22	1.04	0.19	35
	速效磷(mg/kg)	14.34	30.64	23.36	5.89	-0.15	-1.52	0.18	25
	速效钾(mg/kg)	109.16	186.22	138.12	21.82	1.26	1.30	0.13	16
	全氮(g/kg)	1.65	6.77	4.59	1.52	-0.38	-0.42	0.20	33
20~60cm	有机质(g/kg)	22.29	77.96	38.78	18.39	1.18	0.36	0.20	47
	碱解氮(mg/kg)	22.07	78.38	47.12	19.79	0.08	-1.53	0.20	42
	速效磷(mg/kg)	5.60	28.28	13.65	7.61	1.10	-0.26	0.20	56
	速效钾(mg/kg)	74.92	142.25	115.00	17.82	-0.69	1.25	0.20	15
	全氮(g/kg)	0.70	2.20	1.24	0.50	0.59	-0.71	0.20	40

土层 Soil depth (cm)	郁闭度 Canopy density	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen (mg/kg)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	碳氮比 C/N
0~20	0.2	103.73±28.97	95.19±18.89	21.27±4.25	131.13±6.84	3.27±0.82	18.63±2.00
	0.4	109.11±9.31	98.69±6.07	21.82±0.96	151.81±17.61	3.43±0.30	18.73±2.10
	0.6	193.99±27.11	110.57±39.40	24.73±4.67	143.08±15.04	5.66±0.85	19.76±0.85
	0.8	209.30±5.20	120.56±20.52	25.60±4.00	126.45±9.54	5.99±0.20	20.30±0.42
20-60	0.2	33.89±0.49	53.49±5.95	13.08±6.01	132.36±35.75	1.15±0.20	18.62±1.99
	0.4	33.91±10.76	39.65±12.43	9.62±0.83	117.97±12.21	1.23±0.27	18.71±2.10
	0.6	48.79±15.75	56.02±13.07	10.80±1.83	115.26±5.76	1.45±0.42	19.76±0.62
	0.8	38.51±13.48	39.31±15.46	21.11±5.09	137.76±14.87	1.14±0.36	20.65±0.33
P	郁闭度	0.390	0.950	0.425	0.688	0.516	0.548
	土层	0.000	0.000	0.002	0.009	0.000	0.367
	郁闭度×土层	0.000	0.035	0.052	0.268	0.000	0.877

不同郁闭度天山云杉林土壤养分特征

Study on soil nutrient characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. Tianschanica forest with different canopy densities

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen (mg/kg)	速效磷 Available phosp horus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available potas sium (mg/kg)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)
有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	1
碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen (mg/kg)	0.852^**	1
速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	0.623^**	0.628^**	1
速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg)	0.314	0.275	0.413^**	1
全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	0.984^**	0.823^**	0.664^**	0.346	1

[1]	候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.
[2]	牛婷婷, 马明生, 张军高. 秸秆还田和覆膜对旱作雨养农田土壤理化性质及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906.
[3]	鲁伟丹, 周远航, 马小龙, 高江龙, 樊晓琴, 郭建富, 李健强, 林明. 不同比例有机肥替代化肥对甜菜植株养分及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1631-1639.
[4]	侯献飞, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 买买提依明·斯马依, 崔福洋. 棉花-花生轮作模式对土壤养分及其产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1657-1665.
[5]	张钊, 张贵龙, 汤秋香, 闫雪影, 张艳军. 有机无机肥配施对潮土麦田肥力和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1067-1076.
[6]	王季姣, 潘越, 王世伟, 韩政伟, 马勇, 虎海防, 王宝庆. 土壤养分与北冰红山葡萄果实品质间的典型相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 355-364.
[7]	孙晨, 槐国龙, 王斌, 孙九胜, 杨志莹, 单娜娜. 化肥减量配施黄腐酸对盐渍化土壤养分及花生生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2934-2942.
[8]	冯梅, 肖莉娟, 张世卿, 王晶晶. 骏枣果园土壤养分含量对果实氨基酸的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 136-147.
[9]	邓永辉, 郑强卿, 兖攀, 王文军, 陈奇凌, 王晶晶, 张锦强, 王振东. 干旱区骏枣根系分布和土壤养分关系分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 156-164.
[10]	马琪瑶, 郝康迪, 胡天祺, 陈哲, 王振锡. 不同分辨遥感影像下天山云杉林分形特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 209-216.
[11]	封帆, 谢开云, 艾比布拉·伊马木, 万江春. 果园生草对苹果园杂草控制、土壤养分及果树营养状况的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 982-991.
[12]	吕亮雨, 樊光辉, 付全, 苏彩风, 李发毅. 生物有机肥对枸杞生长及土壤性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2779-2789.
[13]	左筱筱, 颜安, 宁松瑞, 杨利, 孙萌, 卢前成. 盐碱麦田生物有机肥促生增产培肥效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2532-2540.
[14]	石学萍, 张谦, 王燕, 董明, 祁虹, 冯国艺, 孙红春, 王树林. 有机肥替代部分化肥对棉田土壤养分含量与棉花产量收益的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 192-196.
[15]	杨金钰, 许咏梅, 孙九胜. 长期不同施肥措施下灌漠土养分特征变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 433-440.