陆地棉杂交组合F1、F2苗期优势表现及亲本配合力分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.02.001

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (2): 261-271.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.02.001

• 作物遗传育种·耕作栽培·种质资源·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

陆地棉杂交组合F₁、F₂苗期优势表现及亲本配合力分析

陈亮亮(), 张梦, 郭立平, 戚廷香, 张学贤, 唐会妮, 王海林, 乔秀琴, 吴建勇, 邢朝柱()

中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室/农业农村部棉花生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,河南安阳 455000

收稿日期:2022-07-25 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-03-31
通信作者: 邢朝柱(1967-),男,安徽无为人,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为棉花遗传育种,(E-mail)chaozhuxing@126.com
作者简介:陈亮亮(1996-),女,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花遗传育种,(E-mail)cll12111721@163.com
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(1610162021015);国家自然科学基金(31871679);天山青年计划(2018Q010);国家重点研发计划“棉花杂种优势利用技术与强优势杂交种创制”(2016YFD0101400)

Heterosis Performance and Their Parental Combining Ability Analysis of F₁ and F₂ Hybrids of Upland Cotton at Seedling Stage

CHEN Liangliang(), ZHANG Meng, GUO Liping, QI Tingxiang, ZHANG Xuexian, TANG Huini, WANG Hailin, QIAO Xiuqin, WU Jianyong, XING Chaozhu()

State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Institute of Cotton Research of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang Henan 455000, China

Received:2022-07-25 Published:2023-02-20 Online:2023-03-31
Correspondence author: XING Chaozhu(1967-),male,Researcher, Doctor, Research direction: The principle and utilization of cotton heterosis, (E-mail) chaozhuxing@126.com
Supported by:
Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund(1610162021015);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31871679);Tianshan Youth Program(2018Q010);National Key R&D Project of China(2016YFD0101400)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 筛选优异亲本和强优势杂交组合选育,为棉花F₂生产应用提供理论依据。【方法】 以8个核背景不同的陆地棉材料为亲本,采用5×3的NC Ⅱ遗传交配设计,在大田环境条件下,测定亲本、F₁、F₂和对照品种苗期株高、叶片SPAD值和光合作用参数。【结果】 株高、SPAD值和净光合速率的广义遗传力和狭义遗传力较高,部分性状的F₂遗传力高于F₁。苗期各性状一般配合力好的亲本为P₁(中901)、P₂(ZB)、P₆(大桃)和P₇(Z98);杂交组合F₁和F₂在苗期性状(株高、SPAD值、净光合速率、气孔导度、胞间CO₂浓度、蒸腾速率)中特殊配合力表现较好的为组合2(中901×Z98)、组合5(ZB×Z98)、组合7(SJ48×DT)。15个杂交组合的F₁和F₂在苗期各性状中较对照表现出不同的竞争优势,部分组合具有显著性差异;多数杂交组合的F₁和F₂在株高、SPAD值、净光合速率和气孔导度表现出正向中亲优势和超亲优势,而大多数组合F₁和F₂的胞间CO₂浓度和蒸腾速率表现出明显的负向中亲优势和超亲优势。【结论】 在苗期性状中由父本P₇(Z98)组配的杂交组合在后代表现较好,具有较大的利用潜力。

关键词: 陆地棉; 杂交种; 苗期; 优势表现; 配合力

Abstract:

【Objective】 The purpose of this study is to provide theoretical foundation for the selection of superior parents, hybrid combinations and F₂ of cotton product application. 【Method】 Eight parents from areas of Yellow River, Yangtze River and Northwest Inland were divided into two groups of 5 or 3 respectively, and made crosses according to NCⅡ design of the incomplete diallel cross (5×3); The plant height, leaf seedling SPAD values, and photosynthesis parameters of the parental, F₁, F₂ and control varieties were determined under field environmental conditions. 【Result】 The results showed that, both broad sense heritability and narrow sense hetriability in plant height, SPAD, photosynthetic parameter were relatively high and some traits of F₂ heritability was higher than that of F₁ in seeding stage. Every trait of the parent with best general combining ability(GCA) were P₁(Zhong 901), P₂(ZB), P₆(DT) and P₇(Z98) in seeding stage. The hybrid F₁ and F₂ which showed better special combining ability in each character at seedling stage were combination 2(Zhong901×Z98), combination 5(ZB×Z98) and combination 7(SJ48×DT). The 15 hybrid combinations F₁ and F₂ showed different competitive advantages in seeding stage compared with the contol, and some combinations showed significant differences. Mostly combinations of F₁ and F₂ showed positive heterosis advantage with competitive advantage, the mid-parent and high-parent in plant height, SPAD value, net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance, but in others traits, F₁ and F₂ combinations showed negative heterosis advantage with mid-parent and high-parent. 【Conclusion】 In this study, based on breeding practice of hybrid cotton varieties, the heterosis performance and combining ability in different generations of traits at seedling stage are systematically analyzed. It is found that the hybrid combination composed of the male parent P₇ (Z98) group performs better than other combinations in the seedling stage traits and has a greater utilization potential.

Key words: upland cotton; hybrids; seeding stage; heterosis performance; combining ability

中图分类号:

S562

陈亮亮, 张梦, 郭立平, 戚廷香, 张学贤, 唐会妮, 王海林, 乔秀琴, 吴建勇, 邢朝柱. 陆地棉杂交组合F₁、F₂苗期优势表现及亲本配合力分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 261-271.

CHEN Liangliang, ZHANG Meng, GUO Liping, QI Tingxiang, ZHANG Xuexian, TANG Huini, WANG Hailin, QIAO Xiuqin, WU Jianyong, XING Chaozhu. Heterosis Performance and Their Parental Combining Ability Analysis of F₁ and F₂ Hybrids of Upland Cotton at Seedling Stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 261-271.

图/表 5

参考文献 31

[1]	喻树迅, 魏晓文, 赵新华. 中国棉花生产与科技发展[J]. 棉花学报, 2000, 12(6):327-329.
	YU Shuxun, WEI Xiaowen, ZHAO Xinhua. Cotton production and technical development in China[J]. Cotton Science, 2000, 12(6): 327-329.
[2]	谢宗铭, 宿俊吉, 董永梅. 棉花杂种优势利用现状及发展思路[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(18):7615-7617,7620.
	XIE Zongming, SU Junji, DONG Yongmei. Advances and reflections on heterosis utilization in cotton[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(18): 7615-7617,7620.
[3]	郭立平, 邢朝柱, 苗成朵, 等. 棉花强优势杂交种中棉所29、38、39及其亲本的生理生化特性研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2005, 17(5):314-315.
	GUO Liping, XING Chaozhu, MIAO Chengduo, et al. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of hybrid cotton CCRI29, CCRI38, CCRI39 and their parents[J]. Cotton Science, 2005, 17(5): 314-315.
[4]	郑德明, 姜益娟, 吕双庆, 等. 陆地棉与海岛棉干物质累积分配特性[J]. 塔里木农垦大学学报, 1995, 7(2):10-13.
	ZHENG Deming, JIANG Yijuan, LV Shuangqing, et al. Dry matter accumulation and distribution characteristics of upland cotton and Sea Island cotton[J]. Journal of Tarim University of Agricultural Reclamation, 1995, 7(2): 10-13.
[5]	沈允钢, 程建峰. 光合作用与农业生产[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46(6):513-516.
	SHEN Yungang, CHENG Jianfeng. Photosynthesis and agricultural production[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2010. 46(6): 513-516.
[6]	Wang J, Wei L, Tong Y, et al. Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 250-259. DOI PMID
[7]	Zelitch I. The close relationship between net photosynthesis and crop yield[J]. Bio Science, 1982, 32(10): 796-802.
[8]	朱志花, 马明, 金高明, 等. 五个苹果品种的光合特性及叶绿素荧光比较研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2015,(20):6-12.
	ZHU Zhihua, MA Ming, JIN Gaoming, et al. Comparative studies on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence in five apple cultivars[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015,(20): 6-12.
[9]	Bauer P J, Frederick J R, Brodow J M, et al. Canopy photosynthesis and fiber properties of normal and late‐planted cotton[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(3): 518-523. DOI URL
[10]	张亚黎, 姚贺胜, 罗毅, 等. 海岛棉和陆地棉叶片光合能力的差异及限制因素[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(7):1803-1810.
	ZHANG YAli, YAO Hesheng, LUO Yi, et al. Difference in leaf photosynthetic capacity between pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense) and upland cotton (G.hirsutum) and analysis of potential constraints[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(7):1803-1810.
[11]	伍维模, 董合林, 危常洲, 等. 南疆陆地棉与海岛棉光合-光响应及叶绿素荧光特性分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2006, 15(4):141-146.
	WU Weimo, DONG Helin, WEI Changzhou, et al. Analysis of light Flux/effect curves and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of cotton (Gossypium.barbadense L. and Gossypium. Hirsutum L.) in southern Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2006, 15(4): 141-146.
[12]	沈淞海, 许馥华. 棉花杂种及其亲本光合色素特性比较[J]. 中国棉花, 1992, 92(4):10-12.
	SHEN Songhai, XU Fuhua. Comparison of characteristics of photosynthetic pigments between cotton hybrids and their parents[J]. China Cotton, 1992, 92(4): 10-12.
[13]	史加亮, 李凤瑞, 赵文超, 等. 陆地棉特异种质主要性状配合力和遗传力分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(1):14-19.
	SHI Jialiang, LI Fengrui, ZHAO Wenchao, et al. Analysis on combining ability and heritability of main traits for special heteroplasm in upland cotton[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(1): 14-19.
[14]	王旭文, 刘丽, 孔宪辉, 等. 早熟陆地棉与转Bt基因棉的配合力和杂种优势分析[J]. 棉花科学, 2020, 42(5):30-39.
	WANG Xuwen, LIU Li, KONG Xianhui, et al. Analysis on the combining ability and heterosis of early maturing upland cotton and transgenic Bt cotton[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2020, 42(5): 30-39.
[15]	王巧玲, 李哲. 棉花海陆杂交F₁代纤维品质杂种优势及配合力分析[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3):12-18.
	WANG Lingqiao, LI Zhe. Heterosis and combining ability analysis of fiber quality trait of sea-land hybrid F₁ generation[J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(3): 12-18.
[16]	游俊, 刘金兰, 孙济中. 陆地棉品种与陆地棉族系种质系间生理生化性状的杂种优势[J]. 棉花学报, 1998, 10(1):15-20.
	YOU Jun, LIU Jinlan, SUN Jizhong. Heterosis of Some Physiological- biochemical Characters in Intraspecific Crosses between Upland Cotton and Breeding Lines Developed from Primitive Race Stocks (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Cotton Science, 1998, 10(1): 15-20.
[17]	孙济中, 刘金兰, 张金发. 棉花杂种优势的研究和利用[J]. 棉花学报, 1994, 6(3):135-139.
	SUN Jizhong, LIU Jinlan, ZHANG Jinfa. Research and utilization of cotton heterosis[J]. Cotton Science, 1994, 6(3): 135-139.
[18]	张天真. 作物育种学总论[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 2003.
	ZHANG Tianzhen. General introduction to crop breeding[M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 2003.
[19]	刘丽, 孔宪辉, 王旭文, 等. 早熟陆地棉主要性状配合力及杂种优势分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(8):1428-1437. DOI
	LIU Li, KONG Xianhui, WANG Xuwen, et al. Analysis of the heterosis and combining ability of main traits for early maturing upland cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(8): 1428-1437. DOI
[20]	董承光, 周小凤, 马晓梅, 等. 陆地棉芽黄突变体杂种优势及配合力分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(12):2720-2725.
	DONG Chengguang, ZHOU Xiaofeng, MA Xiaomei, et al. Heterosis and combining ability analysis of virescent mutant in upland cotton[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(12): 2720-2725.
[21]	Basal H, Canavar O, Cerit C S. Combining ability and heterotic studies through line×tester in local and exotic upland cotton genotypes[J]. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2011, 43(3): 1699-1706.
[22]	Meyer S, Pospisic H, Scholten S. Heterosis associated gene expression in maize embryos 6 days after fertilization exhibits additive, dominant and overdominant pattern[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2007, 63(3): 381-391. PMID
[23]	Hoecker N, Keller B, Piepho H P, et al. Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112(3): 421-429. PMID
[24]	邢朝柱, 郭立平, 李威, 等. 棉花杂种优势利用研究十年成就和未来发展[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(S1):28-36.
	XING Chaozhu, GUO Liping, LI Wei, et al. Ten-year achievements and future development of cotton heterosis utilization[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(S1): 28-36.
[25]	Wu Y T, Yin J M, Guo W Z, et al. Heterosis performance of yield and fiber quality in F₁ and F₂ hybrids in upland cotton[J]. Plant Breeding, 2010, 123(3): 285-289. DOI URL
[26]	陈亮亮, 张梦, 郭立平, 等. 浅谈陆地棉杂种二代利用[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(12):1-4.
	CHEN Liangliang, ZHANG Meng, GUO Liping, et al. Research progress on F₂ utilization of cotton hybrids[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(12): 1-4.
[27]	邓仲篪, 孙济中, 张金发, 等. 杂交棉及其亲本光合特性的研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1995, 14(5):429-434.
	DENG Zhongchi, SUN Jizhong, ZHANG Jinfa, et al. Study on photosynthetic characteristics of hybrid cotton and its parents[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 1995, 14(5): 429-434.
[28]	Farquhar G D, Sharkeyt D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 1982, 33(1): 317-345.
[29]	王学德, 潘家驹. 陆地棉杂种优势及自交衰退的遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 1991, 17(1):18-23.
	WANG Xuede, PAN Jiaju. Genetic analysis of heterosis and selfing decline in upland cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1991, 17(1): 18-23.
[30]	Shahzad K, Zhang X, Guo L, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of inbred lines and contrasting hybrids reveals overdominance mediate early biomass vigor in hybrid cotton[J]. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21(1): 140-155. DOI PMID
[31]	王志军, 谢宗铭, 董永梅, 等. 棉花陆海杂交亲本及子代光合叶绿素荧光参数分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(5):134-137,192.
	WANG Zhijun, XIE Zongming, DONG Yongmei, et al. Analysis of photosynthetic chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cotton parents and offspring of land-sea hybrids[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(5): 134-137,192.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

145

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	45	0	0	100

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	119	26
比例	82%	18%

摘要

1358

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	1357

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	1222	136
比例	90%	10%

母本代号 Female Code	父本和组合代号 Male and Combination code
母本代号 Female Code	P₆	P₇	P₈
P₁	1(P₁×P₆)	2(P₁×P₇)	3(P₁×P₈)
P₂	4(P₂×P₆)	5(P₂×P₇)	6(P₂×P₈)
P₃	7(P₃×P₆)	8(P₃×P₇)	9(P₃×P₈)
P₄	10(P₄×P₆)	11(P₄×P₇)	12(P₄×P₈)
P₅	13(P₅×P₆)	14(P₅×P₇)	15(P₅×P₈)

母本代号 Female Code	父本和组合代号 Male and Combination code
母本代号 Female Code	P₆	P₇	P₈
P₁	1(P₁×P₆)	2(P₁×P₇)	3(P₁×P₈)
P₂	4(P₂×P₆)	5(P₂×P₇)	6(P₂×P₈)
P₃	7(P₃×P₆)	8(P₃×P₇)	9(P₃×P₈)
P₄	10(P₄×P₆)	11(P₄×P₇)	12(P₄×P₈)
P₅	13(P₅×P₆)	14(P₅×P₇)	15(P₅×P₈)

性状 Trait	世代 Generation	区组 Block	组合 Combination	父本 Male	母本 Female	父本×母本 Male×Female	广义遗传力 H²(%)	狭义遗传力 h²(%)
株高 Plant height	F₁	4.07^*	3.76^**	1.96	0.99	3.31^**	85.43	18.66
株高 Plant height	F₂	1.15	4.17^**	4.60^*	0.64	2.95^**	88.18	23.54
叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content	F₁	2.63	13.60^**	0.93	0.37	16.79^**	94.36	25.68
叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content	F₂	1.83	18.48^**	4.2705^*	0.51	15.60^**	90.04	24.68
净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate	F₁	0.26	17.56^**	2.12	0.56	16.99^**	92.04	23.45
净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate	F₂	0.03	35.02^**	3.57	0.52	28.50^**	97.89	26.79
光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity	F₁	0.29	33.66^**	5.46^*	1.74	18.21^**	84.31	13.48
光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity	F₂	0.42	23.32^**	4.17^*	0.14	20.03^**	86.19	10.73
胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular carbon dioxide concentrationCi	F₁	2.51	15.65^**	14.02^**	0.47	5.78^**	86.02	11.65
胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular carbon dioxide concentrationCi	F₂	0.65	25.79^**	23.84^**	3.58^*	5.19^**	80.40	10.99
蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate	F₁	6.12^**	0.62	0.29	0.56	0.80	10.44	5.14
蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate	F₂	3.72^*	2.75^**	2.41	1.09	2.24^*	59.93	13.07

性状 Trait	世代 Generation	区组 Block	组合 Combination	父本 Male	母本 Female	父本×母本 Male×Female	广义遗传力 H²(%)	狭义遗传力 h²(%)
株高 Plant height	F₁	4.07^*	3.76^**	1.96	0.99	3.31^**	85.43	18.66
株高 Plant height	F₂	1.15	4.17^**	4.60^*	0.64	2.95^**	88.18	23.54
叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content	F₁	2.63	13.60^**	0.93	0.37	16.79^**	94.36	25.68
叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content	F₂	1.83	18.48^**	4.2705^*	0.51	15.60^**	90.04	24.68
净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate	F₁	0.26	17.56^**	2.12	0.56	16.99^**	92.04	23.45
净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate	F₂	0.03	35.02^**	3.57	0.52	28.50^**	97.89	26.79
光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity	F₁	0.29	33.66^**	5.46^*	1.74	18.21^**	84.31	13.48
光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity	F₂	0.42	23.32^**	4.17^*	0.14	20.03^**	86.19	10.73
胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular carbon dioxide concentrationCi	F₁	2.51	15.65^**	14.02^**	0.47	5.78^**	86.02	11.65
胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular carbon dioxide concentrationCi	F₂	0.65	25.79^**	23.84^**	3.58^*	5.19^**	80.40	10.99
蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate	F₁	6.12^**	0.62	0.29	0.56	0.80	10.44	5.14
蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate	F₂	3.72^*	2.75^**	2.41	1.09	2.24^*	59.93	13.07

亲本 Parent	世代 Generation	株高 Plant height	叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content	净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate	光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity	胞间CO₂浓度Ci Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration	蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate
P₁	F₁	0.218	0.521	0.148	18.506	-11.144	-0.182
P₁	F₂	0.070	-0.254	0.450	-16.083	-26.446	-0.258
P₂	F₁	0.001	-0.538	2.398	11.256	-7.052	0.269
P₂	F₂	-0.046	-1.523	1.497	16.536	2.169	0.131
P₃	F₁	0.416	-1.352	0.052	-3.152	-5.471	-0.240
P₃	F₂	0.293	-1.832	0.311	15.120	1.573	-0.088
P₄	F₁	-0.379	1.081	-1.714	-36.115	15.572	0.061
P₄	F₂	-0.254	1.900	-0.676	8.589	1.465	0.281
P₅	F₁	-0.257	0.288	-0.885	9.505	8.096	0.093
P₅	F₂	-0.064	1.710	-1.581	-24.162	21.240	-0.066
P₆	F₁	-0.154	0.242	-0.271	6.463	-3.964	-0.040
P₆	F₂	0.247	1.197	0.493	13.713	-1.155	0.192
P₇	F₁	0.089	-0.446	0.425	2.894	1.811	0.219
P₇	F₂	-0.124	-1.255	1.018	-1.921	-0.669	-0.027
P₈	F₁	0.064	0.204	-0.155	-9.357	2.153	-0.179
P₈	F₂	-0.123	0.059	-1.512	-11.792	1.823	-0.165

陆地棉杂交组合F₁、F₂苗期优势表现及亲本配合力分析

Heterosis Performance and Their Parental Combining Ability Analysis of F₁ and F₂ Hybrids of Upland Cotton at Seedling Stage

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

亲本 Parent	世代 Generation	株高 Plant height	叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content	净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate	光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity	胞间CO₂浓度Ci Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration	蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate
1	F₁	0.012	0.343	-0.736	-4.095	2.699	-0.019
1	F₂	-0.593	0.614	-1.062	11.863	5.756	0.269
2	F₁	0.416	-1.471	2.372	17.742	5.687	0.281
2	F₂	-0.203	-2.106	2.235	-6.198	-7.614	-0.432
3	F₁	0.034	0.403	-0.825	-33.035	3.505	-0.142
3	F₂	0.055	-2.099	-2.653	-46.803	5.323	-0.413
4	F₁	0.041	-0.325	0.223	24.856	2.465	-0.091
4	F₂	0.025	-0.350	0.130	-17.766	-8.201	-0.093
5	F₁	0.110	-0.356	0.824	-13.103	3.157	0.492
5	F₂	-0.374	-1.817	0.980	-18.369	-3.318	0.107
6	F₁	0.311	-0.045	-0.235	-31.142	6.269	-0.281
6	F₂	-0.392	-1.423	-2.589	-5.004	14.982	-0.590
7	F₁	0.068	0.369	1.355	-1.017	-5.824	-0.196
7	F₂	0.705	0.559	1.295	9.772	-1.940	-0.148
8	F₁	0.413	-0.057	-0.429	-18.743	4.105	0.396
8	F₂	-0.454	-2.668	-0.911	-33.459	4.627	-0.229
9	F₁	-0.019	-1.037	-0.114	0.372	13.61	-0.080
9	F₂	-0.992	-1.481	-1.863	-17.452	0.777	-0.198
10	F₁	-0.423	-0.037	0.374	2.371	-3.274	-0.245
10	F₂	0.305	-0.356	0.399	6.816	-1.420	-0.084
11	F₁	0.488	-1.871	1.644	-10.907	4.362	0.357
11	F₂	-0.667	-3.194	0.378	-12.011	6.867	-0.041
12	F₁	0.397	1.183	-1.207	-10.853	10.804	0.009
12	F₂	-0.379	-0.039	-2.256	-35.943	-1.983	-0.451
13	F₁	0.302	-0.351	-1.216	-22.114	3.934	0.551
13	F₂	-0.443	-0.467	-0.762	-10.685	5.805	0.056
14	F₁	-0.210	0.316	-0.933	7.164	11.564	-0.230
14	F₂	-0.155	-2.476	-0.056	-8.132	1.868	-0.500
15	F₁	0.370	-0.691	2.961	-4.439	-3.606	-0.202
15	F₂	-0.143	-0.646	-0.662	-22.321	-4.209	-0.132

组合 Combin- ation	世代 Gener- ation	株高Plant height				叶绿素含量SPAD Chlorophyll content
组合 Combin- ation	世代 Gener- ation	平均值 Average value	竞争优势 Competitive advantage	中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis	超亲优势 Over-parent heterosis	平均值 Average value	竞争优势 Competitive advantage	中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis	超亲优势 Over-parent heterosis
1	F₁	18.49	2.08	4.16	1.30	42.51^*	9.41	14.14	0.11
	F₂	17.94	2.62	1.06	-1.71	41.51^*	6.84	11.46	-2.25
2	F₁	18.89	4.31	9.70	9.52	40.69	4.74	2.80	-4.16
	F₂	18.33	1.20	6.43	6.25	38.79	-0.17	-2.02	-8.65
3	F₁	18.51	2.20	7.14	6.98	42.57^**	9.56	3.93	0.25
	F₂	18.59	-0.96	9.37	7.42	38.79	-0.15	-5.28	-8.64
4	F₁	18.30	1.04	3.29	0.27	40.78	4.96	9.51	1.22
	F₂	18.44	1.81	4.82	1.04	39.27	1.09	5.46	-2.52
5	F₁	18.37	1.42	6.87	6.84	40.75^*	4.88	1.90	2.66
	F₂	18.04	-0.39	5.72	4.93	37.81	-2.69	-5.46	-4.75
6	F₁	18.57	2.53	7.70	7.33	41.06^**	5.69	3.76	3.44
	F₂	18.02	-0.49	7.06	4.16	38.20	-1.68	-3.47	-3.76
7	F₁	18.74	3.48	4.22	2.69	40.66	4.66	1.20	0.93
	F₂	19.46^*	7.44	8.80	6.62	39.87	2.63	-0.75	-1.03
8	F₁	19.09	5.39	9.36	7.74	40.23	3.56	4.80	0.42
	F₂	18.30	1.04	5.44	3.29	36.65	-5.67	-4.54	-8.54
9	F₁	18.65	3.00	6.54	5.30	39.25	1.04	-1.27	-2.03
	F₂	17.76	-1.93	3.70	0.26	37.83	-2.62	-4.85	-5.57
10	F₁	17.46	-3.62	-2.56	-4.35	42.69^*	9.87	7.26	5.96
	F₂	18.51	2.21	4.70	1.44	42.69^*	9.88	5.72	5.97
11	F₁	18.37	1.41	5.64	4.48	40.85	5.15	7.48	3.93
	F₂	17.54	-3.16	2.26	-0.23	39.85	2.58	3.26	1.39
12	F₁	18.28	0.90	4.78	3.96	43.91^*	13.01	11.49	11.29
	F₂	17.83	-1.56	5.34	1.41	43.01^*	10.70	7.62	9.01
13	F₁	18.30	1.06	3.61	0.29	41.58^*	7.02	3.30	3.21
	F₂	17.95	-0.87	1.63	-1.63	42.39	9.11	1.88	5.22
14	F₁	17.79	-1.77	3.82	3.48	42.25	8.74	9.83	4.87
	F₂	18.24	0.72	6.45	6.11	40.38	3.94	1.41	0.23
15	F₁	18.37	1.44	6.86	6.18	41.24^**	6.15	3.53	2.37
	F₂	18.25	0.79	7.96	5.50	42.21	8.65	2.48	4.77
CK		18.11				38.85
组合 Combin- ation	世代 Gener- ation	净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate				光合导度Gs Photosynthetic conductivity
组合 Combin- ation	世代 Gener- ation	平均值 Average value	竞争优势 Competitive advantage	中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis	超亲优势 Over-parent heterosis	平均值 Average value	竞争优势 Competitive advantage	中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis	超亲优势 Over-parent heterosis
1	F₁	16.99	13.83	5.24	2.26	271.45	50.44	20.55	18.62
	F₂	16.37	-1.03	1.35	-1.52	249.10	38.05	10.63	8.85
2	F₁	20.10^*	34.66	21.74	15.89	293.29^**	62.54	30.14	27.93
	F₂	19.66^*	31.72	19.08	13.36	231.04	28.04	2.51	0.78
3	F₁	16.90	13.24	4.54	1.45	242.51	34.40	0.47	-7.18
	F₂	14.77	9.63	-8.63	-11.33	190.43	5.54	-21.11	-27.11
4	F₁	20.20^*	35.33	25.72	21.57	293.15^**	62.47	30.34	28.10
	F₂	18.60	24.62	15.78	11.95	252.09	39.71	12.08	10.16
5	F₁	20.80^*	39.35	26.59	19.93	255.19	41.43	13.36	11.32
	F₂	19.45^*	30.32	18.38	12.15	251.49	39.37	11.71	9.70
6	F₁	19.74^*	32.25	22.69	18.49	237.15	31.43	-1.65	-9.23
	F₂	15.88	6.41	-1.28	-4.67	264.85^*	46.78	9.84	1.37
7	F₁	18.99^*	27.19	21.96	14.26	252.87^**	40.14	18.05	10.50
	F₂	18.58	24.48	19.36	11.82	278.21^*	54.19	29.88	21.57
8	F₁	17.20	15.24	7.98	-0.82	235.15^*	30.32	9.67	2.57
	F₂	16.38	9.71	2.79	-5.59	234.98	30.23	9.59	2.50
9	F₁	17.52	17.35	12.36	5.14	254.26^*	40.91	10.35	-2.68
	F₂	15.42	3.33	-1.07	-7.43	250.99	39.10	8.93	-3.94
10	F₁	16.24	8.80	2.56	-2.27	223.30	23.75	-2.37	-2.43
	F₂	16.70	11.87	5.46	0.50	268.72	48.93	17.49	17.42
11	F₁	17.51	17.30	8.09	0.95	210.02	16.39	-8.25	-8.39
	F₂	16.68	11.73	2.96	-3.85	249.90	38.49	9.17	9.01
12	F₁	14.66	-1.80	-7.56	-12.02	210.07	16.42	-14.23	-19.60
	F₂	14.04	-5.92	-11.43	-15.71	225.96	25.23	-7.74	-13.51
13	F₁	15.48	3.69	0.21	-6.85	244.43	35.46	11.68	6.81
	F₂	14.63	-1.97	-5.26	-11.94	218.47	21.08	-0.18	-4.53
14	F₁	15.76	5.60	-0.30	-9.12	273.71^*	51.69	24.94	19.39
	F₂	15.34	2.76	-2.98	-11.56	221.02	22.49	0.89	-3.59
15	F₁	19.66^*	31.68	27.07	17.97	262.11^*	45.26	11.50	0.32
	F₂	14.73	-1.30	-4.75	-11.57	206.84	14.63	-12.01	-20.83
CK		14.93				180.44
组合 Combin- ation	世代 Gener- ation	胞间CO₂浓度Ci Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration				蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate
组合 Combin- ation	世代 Gener- ation	平均值 Average value	竞争优势 Competitive advantage	中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis	超亲优势 Over-parent heterosis	平均值 Average value	竞争优势 Competitive advantage	中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis	超亲优势 Over-parent heterosis
1	F₁	227.32	-2.15	-17.21	-23.84	3.83^**	51.41	-10.88	-13.64
	F₂	221.26	-4.76	-14.42	-25.88	4.01	58.73	-6.57	-9.46
2	F₁	230.31	-0.86	-18.26	-22.84	4.13^**	63.28	-6.54	-11.73
	F₂	207.89	-10.51	-21.76	-30.36	3.31	31.01	-25.02	-29.17
3	F₁	228.13	-1.80	-18.66	-23.57	3.70^**	46.54	-11.22	-11.54
	F₂	220.82	-4.94	-16.49	-26.02	3.33	31.74	-20.19	-20.48
4	F₁	231.18	-0.49	-11.68	-15.28	4.21^*	66.42	-5.66	-6.25
	F₂	235.91	1.55	-9.88	-13.55	4.04	59.79	-9.42	-9.98
5	F₁	231.88	-0.19	-13.78	-15.03	4.79^**	89.46	4.54	2.43
	F₂	240.80	3.65	-10.47	-11.76	4.24	67.69	-7.48	-9.35
6	F₁	234.99	1.15	-12.20	-13.89	4.02^**	58.92	-7.38	-10.48
	F₂	259.10	11.53	-3.20	-5.05	3.54	40.14	-18.33	-21.05
7	F₁	224.48	-3.37	-11.78	-13.08	3.59	42.11	-8.37	-18.94
	F₂	241.58	3.99	-5.06	-6.46	3.77	48.93	-3.98	-15.05
8	F₁	234.40	0.90	-10.41	-11.55	4.19^**	65.54	3.51	-10.50
	F₂	248.15	6.82	-5.15	-6.36	3.68	45.73	-8.88	-21.22
9	F₁	243.91	4.99	-6.31	-7.05	3.71	46.69	-2.38	-11.45
	F₂	244.30	5.16	-6.16	-6.90	3.72	46.95	-2.21	-11.29
10	F₁	248.07	6.78	-3.71	-6.26	3.84	52.08	-13.87	-14.48
	F₂	241.99	4.17	-6.07	-8.56	4.20	66.08	-5.94	-6.60
11	F₁	255.70	10.07	-3.44	-3.51	4.45	75.88	-3.04	-4.91
	F₂	250.28	7.73	-5.49	-5.56	4.24	67.76	-7.52	-9.31
12	F₁	262.15	12.84	-0.52	-0.94	4.10	62.12	-5.60	-8.83
	F₂	241.43	3.92	-8.39	-8.77	3.83	51.55	-11.76	-14.77
13	F₁	247.80	6.67	-2.22	-3.29	4.67	84.85	13.09	5.44
	F₂	268.99	15.79	6.14	4.98	3.99	57.90	-3.40	-9.94
14	F₁	255.43	9.95	-1.99	-3.61	3.89^**	53.94	-8.52	-16.78
	F₂	265.05	14.09	1.70	0.02	3.44	35.90	-19.24	-26.53
15	F₁	240.26	3.42	-7.35	-8.44	3.92	55.06	-2.25	-6.40
	F₂	258.98	11.48	-0.13	-1.31	3.80	50.45	-5.16	-9.18
CK		232.31				2.53

[1]	王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[2]	李颖, 郭文文, 李江博, 曲延英, 陈全家, 郑凯. 90份转BT基因抗虫棉品种(系)在新疆早熟棉区的适应性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1561-1573.
[3]	姚庆, 王杰花, 西尔娜依·阿不都拉, 地力木拉提·吐拉洪, 崔宏亮. 低温胁迫下不同藜麦品种苗期的生理响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1597-1604.
[4]	巩隽铭, 熊显鹏, 张彩霞, 邵东南, 程帅帅, 孙杰. 陆地棉4-香豆酸辅酶A连接酶基因Gh4CL30的功能分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1301-1309.
[5]	马尚洁, 李生梅, 杨涛, 王红刚, 赵康, 庞博, 高文伟. 陆地棉GHWAT1-35基因的克隆及亚细胞定位[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1310-1317.
[6]	王一钊, 杨其志, 刘玉秀, 阿拉依·努尔卡马力, Vladimir Shvidchenko, 张正茂. PEG胁迫下评价哈萨克斯坦不同春小麦种质苗期的抗旱性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
[7]	王凯迪, 高晨旭, 裴文锋, 杨书贤, 张文庆, 宋吉坤, 马建江, 王莉, 于霁雯, 陈全家. 陆地棉TRM基因家族的鉴定及纤维品质相关优异单倍型分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 521-536.
[8]	崔豫疆, 龚照龙, 王俊铎, 郑巨云, 桑志伟, 阳妮, 梁亚军, 李雪源, 曲延英. 245份陆地棉品种农艺性状及产量构成因素综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2358-2365.
[9]	赵康, 任丹, 梁维维, 庞博, 马尚洁, 张梦媛, 高文伟. 陆地棉正反交F_2∶3家系主要农艺性状与单株皮棉产量的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 19-25.
[10]	王朋, 郑凯, 赵杰银, 高文举, 龙遗磊, 陈全家, 曲延英. 陆地棉种质资源材料的耐热性评价及指标筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090.
[11]	王辉, 郭金成, 宋佳, 张庭军, 何良荣. 高温胁迫下陆地棉GhCIPK6转基因后代生理生化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119.
[12]	宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.
[13]	马青山, 杜霄, 陶志鑫, 韩万里, 龙遗磊, 艾先涛, 胡守林. 陆地棉种质材料机采农艺性状鉴定分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1830-1839.
[14]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[15]	耿翡翡, 孟超敏, 卿桂霞, 周佳敏, 张富厚, 刘逢举. 陆地棉磷高效基因GhMYB4的克隆与表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1406-1412.