天山北坡前山带疏花蔷薇集水造林技术措施筛选

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.018

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 161-170.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.018

天山北坡前山带疏花蔷薇集水造林技术措施筛选

张帅¹(), 程平²(), 张齐武³, 王凯², 武胜利¹, 李宏⁴

1.新疆师范大学地理科学与旅游学院/新疆干旱区湖泊环境与资源重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830054
2.新疆农业大学林学与风景园林学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
3.新疆林业重点工程质量管理总站,乌鲁木齐 830099
4.新疆林业科学院,乌鲁木齐 830092

收稿日期:2022-05-11 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2023-03-07
通信作者: 程平(1985-),男,安徽怀宁人,副研究员,硕士生导师,研究方向为森林培育,(E-mail)84966324@qq.com
作者简介:张帅(1996-),男,重庆万州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林培育,(E-mail)zszs913@163.com
基金资助:
天然林保护工程财政资金专项“新疆天山北坡前山带植被恢复技术研究与示范”(XJTB2020-03)

Research on Water Harvesting and Afforestation Technology of Rosa laxaon the Front Mountain belt of the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains

ZHANG Shuai¹(), CHENG Ping²(), ZHANG Qiwu³, WANG Kai², WU Shengli¹, LI Hong⁴

1. School of Geography and Tourism of Xinjiang Normal University/Key Laboratory of Lake Environment and Resources in Arid Regions of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830054, China
2. College of Forestry and Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
3. Xinjiang Forestry Key Project Quality Management Station, Urumqi 830099, China
4. Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi 830092, China

Received:2022-05-11 Published:2023-01-20 Online:2023-03-07
Correspondence author: CHENG Ping (1985-), male, native place: Huaining, Anhui. Associate researcher, master, research field: Breeding of new peach varieties, (E-mail)84966324@qq.com
Supported by:
Special financial fund for natural forest protection project "Research and demonstration of vegetation restoration technology in the front mountain belt of the north slope of Tianshan Mountain, Xinjiang"(XJTB2020-03)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同整地方式和保水保墒措施对疏花蔷薇造林成活率、生长量及生理生化指标的影响,筛选出在天山北坡前山带区域疏花蔷薇造林最佳的综合技术措施。【方法】在水平沟、V形坑两种整地方式下,设置覆膜(A)、膨润土保水(B)、黄腐酸保墒(C)3种单项保水保墒措施以及A+B、A+C、B+C、A+B+C四种综合保水保墒措施,对照为无保水保墒措施,分析不同造林技术措施对造林地土壤含水量的影响以及疏花蔷薇生长指标、生理指标、光合特性对其响应。【结果】相同保水处理水平沟疏花蔷薇生长量、成活率与V形坑无显著差异(P>0.05),土壤含水量、光和指标、生理指标较优于V形坑;不同保水处理疏花蔷薇土壤含水量、光合特性、生理特性、生长量和存活率存在显著差异(P<0.05),均以A+B+C 处理最佳,两项措施以A+B处理最优,单项措施A处理最优;通过隶属函数值法综合评价各造林技术抗旱性,水平沟A+B+C处理得分最高,V形坑CK处理得分最低。【结论】干旱、半干旱地区造林成活率在70%(含)以上为合格,选出疏花蔷薇最佳造林技术为V形坑A+B处理、V形坑A处理。

关键词: 天山北坡; 前山带; 疏花蔷薇; 造林技术; 整地方式; 保水保墒措施

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of different land preparation methods and water and moisture conservation measures on the survival rate, growth and physiological and biochemical indexes of R. laxa plantations, and to screen the best comprehensive technical measures for R. laxa plantations in the frontal belt area of the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain. 【Method】 Under two types of land preparation methods, namely horizontal ditch and V-shaped pit, three single water and moisture conservation measures, namely mulching (A), bentonite water retention (B) and xanthate moisture retention (C), and four comprehensive water and moisture conservation measures, namely A+B, A+C, B+C and A+B+C, were set, and the control was no water and moisture conservation measures. We analyzed the effects of different silvicultural technical measures on soil moisture content of silvicultural land and the response of growth index, physiological index and photosynthetic characteristics of R. laxa. 【Results】 The growth and survival rate of R. laxa flowering were not significantly different from those of V-shaped pits (P>0.05), and the soil water content, light and physiological indexes were better than those of V-shaped pits; The soil water content, photosynthetic characteristics, physiological characteristics, growth and survival rate of R. laxa y flowering were significantly different among different water conservation treatments (P<0.05), and the best treatment was A+B+C.The drought resistance of each silvicultural technique was evaluated comprehensively by the subordinate function value method, with the highest score for the A+B+C treatment and the lowest score for the CK treatment in the horizontal ditch. 【Conclusion】 According to the Silvicultural Technical Regulations (GB/T 15776-2016), the survival rate of afforestation in arid and semi-arid areas is 70% (inclusive) or more for qualified, and the best silvicultural techniques for R. laxa were selected as V-pit A+B treatment and V-pit A treatment by combining the principle of minimum cost.

Key words: The northern slope of Tianshan Mountains; the former mountain belt; Rosa laxa R.; afforestation techniques; land preparation methods; water and moisture conservation measures

中图分类号:

张帅, 程平, 张齐武, 王凯, 武胜利, 李宏. 天山北坡前山带疏花蔷薇集水造林技术措施筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 161-170.

ZHANG Shuai, CHENG Ping, ZHANG Qiwu, WANG Kai, WU Shengli, LI Hong. Research on Water Harvesting and Afforestation Technology of Rosa laxaon the Front Mountain belt of the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 161-170.

图/表 5

参考文献 31

[1]	程维明, 周成虎, 汤奇成, 等. 天山北坡前山带景观分布特征的遥感研究[J]. 地理学报, 2001,(5): 540-547.
	CHENG Weiming, ZHOU Chenghu, TANG Qicheng, et al. RS Research of Landscape Distribution Characteristics of Northern Piedmont, Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, (5): 540-547.
[2]	刘超, 闫小月, 姜逢清. 天山北坡前山带降水分布型对荒漠植被的影响——基于逐日降水数据和NDVI分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21):7790-7804.
	LIU Chao, YAN Xiaoyue, JIANG Feng qing. Influence of precipitation distribution on desert vegetation of Northern Piedmont,Tianshan Mountains: analysis based on daily NDVI and precipitation data[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 7790-7804.
[3]	田浩, 刘琳, 张正勇, 等. 天山北坡经济带关键性生态空间评[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(1):401-414.
	TIAN Hao, LIU Lin, ZHANG Zhengyong, et al. Evaluation on the critical ecological space of the economic belt of Tianshan northslope[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 401-414.
[4]	吴淑芳, 冯浩, 吴普特. 干旱半干旱地区径流林业研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,(4):150-154.
	WU Shufang, FENG Hao, WU Pute. Progress and prospect of runoff forestry in arid and semiarid regions[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, (4): 150-154.
[5]	陈晓光, 于寒青, 刘文祥, 等. 基于MDC方法评价林下劣地碳氮提升对短期恢复措施的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4):280-287.
	CHEN Xiaoguang, YU Hanqing, LIU Wenxiang, et al. Assessment of the Response of Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Enhancement in Erosion-Degraded Land to Short-Term Restoration Measures Based On Minimum Detectable Change Method[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(4): 280-287.
[6]	赵艳云, 程积民, 王延平, 等. 半干旱区环境因子对柠条灌木林结构的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005,(3):10-14.
	ZHAO Yanyun, CHENG Jimin, WANG Yanping, et al. Influence of Environmental Factors on Formation of Morphological Structure of Caragana Korshiskii. In Semi-arid Region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, (3): 10-14.
[7]	朱聿申, 陈宇轩, 查同刚, 等. 大鱼鳞坑双苗造林技术在黄土沟壑区的应用效果[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(3):560-568.
	ZHU Yushen, CHEN Yuxuan, ZHA Tonggang, et al. Application of Double-seedling Afforestation Technique in Big Fish-scale Pits in the Loess Gully Area[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(3): 560-568.
[8]	吴贤忠, 李毅, 高志永, 等. 白膜、黑膜全年覆盖下的土壤水、热、盐变化[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(11):1701-1709.
	WU Xianzhong, LI Yi, GAO Zhiyong, et al. Variations in soil moisture, heat and salt under year round mulching of white and black film[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(11): 1701-1709.
[9]	王正安, 余治家, 马杰, 等. 不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(5):226-231,237.
	WANG Zhengan, YU Zhijia, MA Jie, et al. Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 226-231,237.
[10]	MI J Z, LIU J H, XU S T. Effects of Sandy Soil Amendment on Soil Moisture and Growth Status of Millet with Rainfed Sandy Soil in a Semi-Arid Region[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 3848:1092-1093.
[11]	Bandiera M, Mosca G, Vamerali T. Humic acids affect root characteristics of fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers.) in metal-polluted wastes[J]. Desalination, 2009, 246(1-3): 78-91. DOI URL
[12]	汤东, 程平, 杨建军, 等. 天山北坡山前植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6):1683-1694.
	TANG Dong, CHENG Ping, YANG Jianjun, et al. Physiological responses of plants to drought stress in the Northern Piedmont, Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(6): 1683-1694.
[13]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001:134-170.
	LI Hesheng. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001: 134-170.
[14]	Rao M V, Paliyath G, Ormrod D P. Ultraviolet-B- and ozone-induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant physiology, 1996, 110(1).
[15]	李娟, 雷霞, 王小利, 等. 干旱胁迫对高羊茅航天诱变新品系生理特性的影响及综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(10):87-98.
	LI Juan, LEI Xia, WANG Xiaoli, et al. Effects of drought stress on the physiological characteristics of new lines of Festuca arundinacea induced by spaceflight and their comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(10): 87-98.
[16]	陈峰, 肖斌, 张柏玉. 安息香属3个树种苗木光合特性与生长性状比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(4):137-139.
	CHEN Feng, XIAO Bin, ZHANG Baiyu. Comparison of Photosynthesis Characteristics and Growth Character for Three Tree Species Seedlings of Styrax[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(4): 137-139.
[17]	董蕾, 陈博, 李吉跃, 等. 5个楸树无性系抗旱性的综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(4):30-35.
	DONG Lei, CHEN Bo, LI Jiyue, et al. Drought resistance evaluation of 5 Catalpa bungei clones[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(4): 30-35.
[18]	杨淑红, 朱镝, 任媛媛, 等. 干旱胁迫下3个杨树品种叶片膜透性及部分渗透调节物质的变化[J]. 上海农业学报, 2016, 32(6):118-123.
	YANG Shuhong, ZHU Di, REN Yuanyuan, et al. Change of leaf membrane permeability and some osmotic regulation substances of 3 poplar varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2016, 32(6): 118-123.
[19]	李英武, 柳晔, 海钦. 宁南山区抗旱集流整地及树种配置技术[J]. 林业实用技术, 2008,(5):23-24.
	LI Yingwu, LIU Ye, HAI Qin. Drought-resistant land preparation and tree species allocation techniques in the mountainous areas of Ningnan[J]. Practical Forestry Technology, 2008, (5): 23-24
[20]	郑长瑞. 不同整地方式对油茶生长的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2013, 40(3):117-119,127.
	ZHENG Changrui. Effects of Different Site Preparing Modes on the Growth of Camellia oleifera Abel[J]. 2013, 40(3): 117-119,127.
[21]	刘文宏, 赵安成, 张西宁. 黄土高原沟壑区集水造林整地形式试验研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2006,(10):62-64.
	LIU Wenhong, ZHAO Ancheng, ZHANG Xining. Experimental study on the form of water harvesting afforestation in the gully area of Loess Plateau[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2006, (10): 62-64.
[22]	LIU C A, JIN S L, ZHOU L M, et al. Effects of plastic film mulch and tillage on maize productivity and soil parameters[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 31(4): 241-249. DOI URL
[23]	禄兴丽, 段雅欣, 李闪闪, 等. 覆膜对半干旱地区马铃薯生长生理性状及作物产量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(7):1582-1594.
	LU Xingli, DUAN Yaxin, LI Shanshan, et al. Effect of film mulching on potato physiological characters and production in semi-arid area[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2021, 57(7): 1582-1594
[24]	Canellas L P, Silva S F, Olk D, et al. Foliar application of Herbaspirillum seropedicae and humic acid increase maize yields[J]. J Food Agric Environ, 2015, 13(1): 146-153.
[25]	García A C, Berbara R L L, Farías L P, et al. Humic acids of vermicompost as an ecological pathway to increase resistance of rice seedlings to water stress[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 11(13): 3125-3134.
[26]	李柯妮, 王康才, 牛灵慧, 等. 保水技术对干旱胁迫下桔梗种子萌发及幼苗生长和生理特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(11):2280-2289.
	LI Keni, WANG Kangcai, NIU Linghui, et al. Effect of Water Conservation Technique on Seeds Germination,Seedling Growrh and Physiological Characteristics of Platycodon grandiflorum[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(11): 2280-2289.
[27]	Gomes F P, Oliva M A, Mielke M S, et al. Osmotic adjustment, proline accumulation and cell membrane stability in leaves of Cocos nucifera submitted to drought stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 126(3): 379-384. DOI URL
[28]	邱孟柯, 回振龙, 黄晓鹏, 等. 黄腐酸对雾培马铃薯幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(3):155-161.
	Qiu Mengke, HUI Zhenlong, HUANG Xiaopeng, et al. Influences of fulvic acid on drought resistance of aeroponic potato seedlings[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(3): 155-161.
[29]	张永青. 拉萨半干旱河谷河滩地抗旱造林技术研究[D]. 拉萨: 西藏大学, 2010.
	ZAHNG Yongqing. Study on Drought Resistant Forestation Technology of Lhasa Semi-arid Valley and Overflow Land[D]. Lhasa: Tibet University, 2010.
[30]	马艳芝, 王向东, 客绍英, 等. 覆膜处理对北柴胡幼苗生长的影响及评价[J]. 农学学报, 2017, 7(6):67-71. DOI
	MA Yanzhi, WANG Xiangdong, KE Shaoying, et al. Bupleurum chinense DC.:Effects and Evaluation of Different Coating Treatments on Seedling Growth[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2017, 7(6): 67-71.
[31]	GB/T 15776-2016.造林技术规程[S].
	GB/T 15776-2016.Artificial afforestation technical regulations[S].

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	2	0	0	43

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	21	24
比例	47%	53%

摘要

整地方式 Land preparation method	处理 Treatment	成活率 Survival rate(%)	新梢生长量 Young shoot growth (cm)	新梢径粗 Shoot diameter (cm)	地上部分鲜重 Fresh weight of overground part(g)	地上部分干重 Dry weight of overground part(g)
水平沟 Horizontal ditch	A	81.67±2.80^bc	45.32±7.55^c	7.71±1.09^cde	145.95±8.15^d	78.52±3.31^e
	B	75.00±4.10^d	31.67±3.51^ef	6.43±0.51^cdefg	126.82±7.3^fg	72.51±2.21^hi
	C	68.33±3.20^de	30.21±3.11^efg	6.02±1.64^defg	83.67±5.08^h	46.28±2.55^j
	A+B	95.00±1.30^a	58.34±3.23^b	8.12±0.95^bcd	199.43±6.95^b	114.81±8.04^b
	A+B	93.33±1.82^a	59.67±4.51^b	8.38±1.33^bc	175.33±5.52^c	105.11±5.19^c
	B+C	73.33±2.25^d	42.83±3.25^c	7.81±1.3^cde	134.68±6.05^ef	74.43±5.68^g
	A+B+C	98.33±3.25^a	81.83±3.55^a	11.22±1.72^a	233.36±9.69^a	131.54±8.56^a
	CK	66.67±2.05^f	27.17±2.36^fg	5.02±0.88^fg	50.29±2.85ⁱ	27.21±1.08^k
V形坑 V-shaped pit	A	76.67±3.90^cd	40.5±3.12^cd	7.12±1.44^cdef	136.25±5.43^e	76.24±5.88^f
	B	68.33±3.60^de	26.67±3.51^fg	5.73±0.42^efg	120.33±3.05^g	71.31±5.02ⁱ
	C	66.67±4.35^f	26.2±3.21^fg	5.34±0.81^fg	81.19±3.02^h	46.15±2.91^j
	A+B	86.67±2.71^b	59.13±3.61^b	8.31±0.98^bc	193.09±11.28^b	111.69±9.25^b
	A+B	85.00±4.40^b	56.5±3.28^b	8.02±1.91^bcd	169.32±8.31^c	90.5±8.75^d
	B+C	71.67±1.85^de	35.33±4.73^de	6.6±1.74^cdefg	129.77±4.66^ef	73.57±3.27^gh
	A+B+C	96.67±2.83^a	77.07±3.72^a	10.02±1.02^ab	228.77±12.89^a	129.22±8.83^a
	CK	50.00±1.40^g	24.33±3.21^g	4.66±1.44^g	47.89±2.17ⁱ	26.88±1.67^k

整地方式 Land preparation method	处理 Treatment	成活率 Survival rate(%)	新梢生长量 Young shoot growth (cm)	新梢径粗 Shoot diameter (cm)	地上部分鲜重 Fresh weight of overground part(g)	地上部分干重 Dry weight of overground part(g)
水平沟 Horizontal ditch	A	81.67±2.80^bc	45.32±7.55^c	7.71±1.09^cde	145.95±8.15^d	78.52±3.31^e
	B	75.00±4.10^d	31.67±3.51^ef	6.43±0.51^cdefg	126.82±7.3^fg	72.51±2.21^hi
	C	68.33±3.20^de	30.21±3.11^efg	6.02±1.64^defg	83.67±5.08^h	46.28±2.55^j
	A+B	95.00±1.30^a	58.34±3.23^b	8.12±0.95^bcd	199.43±6.95^b	114.81±8.04^b
	A+B	93.33±1.82^a	59.67±4.51^b	8.38±1.33^bc	175.33±5.52^c	105.11±5.19^c
	B+C	73.33±2.25^d	42.83±3.25^c	7.81±1.3^cde	134.68±6.05^ef	74.43±5.68^g
	A+B+C	98.33±3.25^a	81.83±3.55^a	11.22±1.72^a	233.36±9.69^a	131.54±8.56^a
	CK	66.67±2.05^f	27.17±2.36^fg	5.02±0.88^fg	50.29±2.85ⁱ	27.21±1.08^k
V形坑 V-shaped pit	A	76.67±3.90^cd	40.5±3.12^cd	7.12±1.44^cdef	136.25±5.43^e	76.24±5.88^f
	B	68.33±3.60^de	26.67±3.51^fg	5.73±0.42^efg	120.33±3.05^g	71.31±5.02ⁱ
	C	66.67±4.35^f	26.2±3.21^fg	5.34±0.81^fg	81.19±3.02^h	46.15±2.91^j
	A+B	86.67±2.71^b	59.13±3.61^b	8.31±0.98^bc	193.09±11.28^b	111.69±9.25^b
	A+B	85.00±4.40^b	56.5±3.28^b	8.02±1.91^bcd	169.32±8.31^c	90.5±8.75^d
	B+C	71.67±1.85^de	35.33±4.73^de	6.6±1.74^cdefg	129.77±4.66^ef	73.57±3.27^gh
	A+B+C	96.67±2.83^a	77.07±3.72^a	10.02±1.02^ab	228.77±12.89^a	129.22±8.83^a
	CK	50.00±1.40^g	24.33±3.21^g	4.66±1.44^g	47.89±2.17ⁱ	26.88±1.67^k

整地方式 Landpreparati onmethod	处理 Treatment	叶绿素 Chlorophyll (mg/g)	可溶性蛋白 SolubleProtein (mg/g)	丙二醛 Malondialdehyde (nmol/g)	脯氨酸 Proline (μg/g)	过氧化物酶 Peroxidase [U/(g·min)]
水平沟 Horizontal ditch	A	1.97±0.08^de	15.84±1.12^efg	13.84±0.52^fg	73.82±2.41^de	174.33±4.04^fg
	B	1.76±0.11^efg	22.23±0.86^ab	17.16±1.66^de	88.77±2.49^c	223.29±3.61^bc
	C	1.62±0.06^fgh	19.79±1.09^cd	24.17±2.46^c	106.3±2.04^b	205.67±5.69^d
	A+B	2.54±0.21^ab	13.18±0.92^h	8.37±1.24^ij	47.33±5.4^g	145.43±8.89ⁱ
	A+C	2.02±0.17^de	17.12±1.58^defg	13.16±1.02^g	67.91±2.51^e	156.33±5.69^h
	B+C	2.23±0.21^cd	15.49±1.01^fg	11.97±0.69^gh	80.98±4.08^d	176.67±4.16^f
	A+B+C	2.66±0.11^a	15.31±1.12^g	7.12±0.83^j	25.17±4.03^h	125.33±5.51^j
	CK	1.34±0.32ⁱ	23.62±0.59^ab	29.21±1.19^a	119.56±2.03^a	247.56±10.15^a
V形坑 V-shaped pit	A	1.85±0.1^ef	12.96±1.37^h	14.23±1.13^fg	53.71±1.55^fg	214.33±4.04^cd
	B	1.23±0.15ⁱ	25.04±1.92^a	25.97±1.37^bc	93.84±4.29^c	194.56±4.32^e
	C	1.49±0.17^ghi	21.62±0.71^bc	18.38±1.29^d	111.59±1.09^b	229.67±4.51^b
	A+B	2.31±0.39^bc	17.76±1.85^def	10.41±0.8^hi	58.84±4.46^f	123.67±5.13^j
	A+C	2.19±0.46^cd	16.61±1.33^efg	12.31±0.98^gh	49.37±2.8^g	164.67±3.06^gh
	B+C	1.95±0.26^e	18.07±1.32^de	15.66±1.07^ef	104.28±3.83^b	184.33±5.51^ef
	A+B+C	2.57±0.33^ab	11.9±1.49^h	8.98±1.38^ij	32.12±1.02^h	113.52±11.14^k
	CK	1.44±0.08^hi	23.65±1.04^ab	27.59±1.57^ab	126.03±2^a	255.85±4.36^a

整地方式 Landpreparati onmethod	处理 Treatment	叶绿素 Chlorophyll (mg/g)	可溶性蛋白 SolubleProtein (mg/g)	丙二醛 Malondialdehyde (nmol/g)	脯氨酸 Proline (μg/g)	过氧化物酶 Peroxidase [U/(g·min)]
水平沟 Horizontal ditch	A	1.97±0.08^de	15.84±1.12^efg	13.84±0.52^fg	73.82±2.41^de	174.33±4.04^fg
	B	1.76±0.11^efg	22.23±0.86^ab	17.16±1.66^de	88.77±2.49^c	223.29±3.61^bc
	C	1.62±0.06^fgh	19.79±1.09^cd	24.17±2.46^c	106.3±2.04^b	205.67±5.69^d
	A+B	2.54±0.21^ab	13.18±0.92^h	8.37±1.24^ij	47.33±5.4^g	145.43±8.89ⁱ
	A+C	2.02±0.17^de	17.12±1.58^defg	13.16±1.02^g	67.91±2.51^e	156.33±5.69^h
	B+C	2.23±0.21^cd	15.49±1.01^fg	11.97±0.69^gh	80.98±4.08^d	176.67±4.16^f
	A+B+C	2.66±0.11^a	15.31±1.12^g	7.12±0.83^j	25.17±4.03^h	125.33±5.51^j
	CK	1.34±0.32ⁱ	23.62±0.59^ab	29.21±1.19^a	119.56±2.03^a	247.56±10.15^a
V形坑 V-shaped pit	A	1.85±0.1^ef	12.96±1.37^h	14.23±1.13^fg	53.71±1.55^fg	214.33±4.04^cd
	B	1.23±0.15ⁱ	25.04±1.92^a	25.97±1.37^bc	93.84±4.29^c	194.56±4.32^e
	C	1.49±0.17^ghi	21.62±0.71^bc	18.38±1.29^d	111.59±1.09^b	229.67±4.51^b
	A+B	2.31±0.39^bc	17.76±1.85^def	10.41±0.8^hi	58.84±4.46^f	123.67±5.13^j
	A+C	2.19±0.46^cd	16.61±1.33^efg	12.31±0.98^gh	49.37±2.8^g	164.67±3.06^gh
	B+C	1.95±0.26^e	18.07±1.32^de	15.66±1.07^ef	104.28±3.83^b	184.33±5.51^ef
	A+B+C	2.57±0.33^ab	11.9±1.49^h	8.98±1.38^ij	32.12±1.02^h	113.52±11.14^k
	CK	1.44±0.08^hi	23.65±1.04^ab	27.59±1.57^ab	126.03±2^a	255.85±4.36^a

整地方式 Landpreparation method	处理 Treatment	净光合速率Pn Net photosynthetic rate [μmol/(m²·s)]	气孔导度Gs Stomatal conductance [mol/(m²·s)]	胞间CO₂浓度Ci Intercellular CO₂ concentration (μmol/mol)	蒸腾速率Tr Tyanspiration rate [mmol/(m²·s)]
水平沟 Horizontal ditch	A	10.85±0.7^e	0.161±0.015^ef	209.18±1.97^gh	2.65±0.09^e
	B	9.64±0.57^f	0.189±0.025^c	223.83±2.88^f	2.19±0.07^fg
	C	7.47±0.34^g	0.165±0.016^cd	213.81±4.50^g	2.05±0.11^gh
	A+B	12.42±0.42^cd	0.287±0.014^a	263.66±2.69^c	3.17±0.09^d
	A+C	13.03±0.41^bc	0.192±0.025^c	249.15±1.4^d	2.37±0.31^f
	B+C	12.44±0.65^cd	0.221±0.012^b	238.4±7.77^e	1.83±0.06^ij
	A+B+C	13.34±0.7^ab	0.271±0.011^a	296.89±1.63^a	4.17±0.05^a
	CK	9.33±0.17^f	0.112±0.011ⁱ	186.78±7.82ⁱ	1.61±0.05^k
V形坑 V-shaped pit	A	12.67±0.29^bcd	0.183±0.013^cd	205.64±2.18^h	3.41±0.04^c
	B	9.13±0.15^f	0.139±0.028^gh	187.78±1.87ⁱ	2.08±0.14^gh
	C	10.49±0.33^e	0.144±0.015^fg	249.48±4.68^d	1.74±0.07^jk
	A+B	13.37±0.17^ab	0.182±0.010^cd	275.61±3.87^b	3.2±0.13^d
	A+C	10.91±0.57^e	0.176±0.016^cde	259.15±1.74^c	3.45±0.11^c
	B+C	11.92±0.36^d	0.125±0.021^hi	226.83±3.45^f	1.95±0.06^hi
	A+B+C	13.89±0.23^a	0.230±0.028^b	274.48±3.74^b	3.89±0.05^b
	CK	8.18±0.2^g	0.091±0.016^j	168.33±2.52^j	1.58±0.03^k

天山北坡前山带疏花蔷薇集水造林技术措施筛选

Research on Water Harvesting and Afforestation Technology of Rosa laxaon the Front Mountain belt of the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 31

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

整地方式 Landpreparation method	处理 Treatment	各指标隶属度值 Affiliation value of each indicator					均值 Average value	排序 Sorting
整地方式 Landpreparation method	处理 Treatment	Z₁	Z₂	Z₃	Z₄	Z₅	均值 Average value	排序 Sorting
水平沟 Horizontal ditch	A	0.53	0.71	0.37	0.52	0.66	0.56	8
	B	0.34	0.42	0.13	0.37	0.43	0.34	11
	C	0	0.17	0.1	0.2	0.35	0.16	14
	A+B	0.77	0.91	0.59	0.78	0.82	0.77	3
	A+C	0.87	0.79	0.61	0.58	0.7	0.71	5
	B+C	0.77	0.5	0.32	0.45	0.59	0.53	9
	A+B+C	0.91	1	1	1	1	0.98	1
	CK	0.29	0.04	0.05	0.06	0.18	0.12	15
V形坑 V-shaped pit	A	0.81	0.63	0.28	0.72	0.52	0.59	7
	B	0.26	0.38	0.04	0.32	0.42	0.28	12
	C	0.47	0.21	0.03	0.14	0.17	0.2	13
	A+B	0.92	0.75	0.6	0.67	0.72	0.73	4
	A+C	0.54	0.71	0.56	0.76	0.59	0.63	6
	B+C	0.69	0.5	0.19	0.22	0.43	0.41	10
	A+B+C	1	0.88	0.92	0.93	0.8	0.91	2
	CK	0.11	0	0	0	0	0.02	16

[1]	汤东, 安玉光, 程平, 李宏, 杨建军, 王凯. 天山北坡前山带典型灌木光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1531-1539.
[2]	夏晓莹, 李思瑶, 王杰, 马小龙, 席丽, 米尔扎提·柯尼加里木, 阿丽耶·麦麦提, 王卫霞. 地形因子对天山北坡天山云杉林土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 965-973.
[3]	王凯, 程平, 玛纳甫·赛依提, 张森, 安玉光, 李宏. 天山北坡前山带区域中国沙棘造林技术[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 368-377.
[4]	高军,尹小君,汪传建,张雅. 天山北坡植被NPP时空格局及气候因子驱动分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(2): 352-361.
[5]	张丽;张鲜花. 天山北坡山地草原类组草地植物群落特征及多样性动态分析[J]. , 2017, 54(1): 148-155.
[6]	王恋恋;安沙舟;范燕敏;梁娜. 天山北坡典型草地封育围栏效果及其光谱特征分析[J]. , 2013, 50(10): 1887-1892.
[7]	吴尊凤;史应武;娄恺;牟文婷;胡雯;廖先燕. 天山北坡垂直自然带土壤古菌多样性分析[J]. , 2012, 49(3): 488-495.
[8]	唐艳;李晓东;胡石开. 新疆天山北坡经济带市县土地集约利用综合评价[J]. , 2009, 46(2): 388-393.
[9]	阿不都克依木·阿布力孜;瓦哈甫·哈力克;阿布都沙塔尔·买买提明;米日姑·买买提. 天山北坡绿洲城镇类型划分及定位[J]. , 2008, 45(3): 553-558.
[10]	崔国盈;刘长娥;安沙舟. 新疆天山北坡山地草甸草地资源退化生态分析[J]. , 2008, 45(2): 347-351.
[11]	李宏;李丕军;李护群;李刚;程晓红;米娜瓦尔;丁明. 克拉玛依大风干旱地区大面积秋季造林技术[J]. , 2001, 38(6): 318-319.