肉用型新疆褐牛不同生长阶段体尺体重性状遗传参数估计及遗传进展分析

Estimation of genetic parameters an genetic trend for growth and weight traits at different stages in meat-type Xinjiang brown cattle

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过计算肉用型新疆褐牛(简称肉用褐牛)各阶段生长发育性状的遗传参数及其遗传进展,为后期更新和优化肉用褐牛选择指数和育种规划方案提供参考。研究对象为3个世代的2486头肉用褐牛,收集了其从出生到24月龄的体重、体高、体斜长、胸围、超声波背膘厚和超声波眼肌面积等6类性状。
    方法 采用遗传评估软件DMU中的AI模块,结合AI-REML、EM算法和多性状动物模型估计上述性状方差−协方差组分,并进行遗传参数估计。
    结果 肉用褐牛不同生长阶段体重性状遗传力( \mathrmh^2 )范围为0.13~0.56,体高遗传力( \mathrmh^2 )范围为0.20~0.41,体斜长遗传力( \mathrmh^2 )范围为0.27~0.41,胸围遗传力( \mathrmh^2 )范围为0.10~0.42,超声波背膘厚遗传力( \mathrmh^2 )范围为0.12~0.62,超声波眼肌面积遗传力( \mathrmh^2 )范围为0.27~0.42。不同生长发育阶段的体重和体尺性状的表型相关( \mathrmr_P )和遗传相关( \mathrmr_A )均为正相关,范围分别在0.59~0.92和0.49~0.78。超声波背膘厚和超声波眼肌面积性状与其他性状相关性较弱,表型相关系数( \mathrmr_P )范围为−0.12~0.37。说明超声波数据需独立纳入肉用褐牛选择指数当中。在不同生长发育阶段,胸围与体重呈现较强的遗传相关或表型相关( \mathrmr_P ),分别介于0.78~0.90和0.87~0.92。24月龄时胸围和超声波背膘厚出现较高遗传相关,遗传相关系数为0.83。说明胸围可作为体重和超声波背膘厚性状的指示性状。肉用褐牛3个横交世代中,初生至24月龄体重平均遗传进展范围在0.34~6.43。6月龄至24月龄体高平均遗传进展范围在0.001~0.35,体斜长平均遗传进展范围在0.15~0.39,胸围平均遗传进展范围在0.06~0.90。上述结果说明,肉用褐牛不同年龄阶段体尺体重性状均有遗传进展,但常规肉用褐牛当前遗传进展相对较慢。
    结论 肉用褐牛体尺和体重性状在不同生长阶段遗传力变化较大,在制定选择指数和育种规划方案时应充分考虑性状间的遗传差。同时发现,超声波性状需独立纳入肉用褐牛选择指数当中。在制定肉用褐牛育种方案时可考虑使用胸围作为体重和超声波背膘厚辅助选择性状。需引入分子育种或生物育种技术,进一步提升肉用褐牛的选择效率。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Calculate the genetic parameters and genetic gain of various growth and development traits of meat-type Xinjiang brown cattle (hereinafter referred to as meat-type brown cattle) at different stages, providing a reference for the subsequent updating and optimization of the selection index and breeding plan for meat-type brown cattle. The research subjects were 2486 meat-type brown cattle from three generations, and six traits including weight, height, body diagonal length, chest circumference, ultrasonic back fat thickness, and ultrasonic eye muscle area from birth to 24 months of age were collected.
    Methods The AI module in the genetic evaluation software DMU was used, in conjunction with the AI-REML, EM algorithm, and a multi-trait animal model to estimate the variance-covariance components of the above traits and to estimate the genetic parameters.
    Results The heritability (h2) of weight traits at different growth stages of meat-type brown cattle ranged from 0.13 to 0.56, height traits from 0.20 to 0.41, body diagonal length from 0.27 to 0.41, chest circumference from 0.10 to 0.42, ultrasonic back fat thickness from 0.12 to 0.62, and ultrasonic eye muscle area from 0.27 to 0.42. Phenotypic and genetic correlations of weight and body size traits at different growth and development stages were all positive, with ranges of 0.59~0.92 and 0.49~0.78, respectively. The correlations of ultrasonic back fat thickness and ultrasonic eye muscle area traits with other traits were weaker, with phenotypic correlation coefficients ranging from −0.12 to 0.37. This indicates that ultrasonic data need to be independently included in the selection index of meat-type brown cattle. At different growth and development stages, chest circumference showed a strong genetic or phenotypic correlation with weight, ranging from 0.78 to 0.90 and 0.87 to 0.92, respectively. At 24 months of age, there was a high genetic correlation between chest circumference and ultrasonic back fat thickness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.83. This indicates that chest circumference can be used as an indicator trait for weight and ultrasonic back fat thickness traits. The average genetic progress of weight traits from birth to 24 months of age in the three crossbreeding generations of meat-type brown cattle ranged from 0.34 to 6.43. The average genetic progress of height traits from 6 to 24 months of age ranged from 0.001 to 0.35, body diagonal length from 0.15 to 0.39, and chest circumference from 0.06 to 0.90. Relative to molecular breeding, the current genetic progress of conventional meat-type brown cattle is relatively slow.
    Conclusion The heritability of body size and weight traits of meat-type brown cattle varies greatly at different growth stages, and this genetic difference should be fully considered when formulating selection indices and breeding plans. It was also found that ultrasonic traits need to be independently included in the selection index of meat-type brown cattle. When formulating the breeding plan for meat-type brown cattle, chest circumference can be considered as an auxiliary selection trait for weight and ultrasonic back fat thickness. Molecular breeding or bio-breeding techniques need to be introduced to further improve the selection efficiency of meat-type brown cattle.

     

/

返回文章
返回