磷水平对新牧1号苜蓿苗期根系形态和植株生长的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.03.027

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 750-756.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.03.027

磷水平对新牧1号苜蓿苗期根系形态和植株生长的影响

马红¹(), 孟捷², 李宁²()

1.伊犁师范大学生物与地理科学学院/伊犁师范大学资源与生态研究所,新疆伊宁 835000
2.新疆农业大学草业与环境科学学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2022-08-02 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-04-18
通信作者: 李宁(1977-),男,山东莱芜人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为牧草营养与施肥,(E-mail)lining772@163.com
作者简介:马红(1996-),女,新疆伊宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物营养学,(E-mail)1822210103@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(201511A019);伊犁师范大学植物生态学重点学科科研项目(YLUPE2022YB07)

Effects of Phosphorus Levels on Root Morphology and Plant Growth of Alfalfa Seedlings

MA Hong¹(), MENG Jie², LI Ning²()

1. College of Biological and Geographical Sciences, Yili Normal University/Institute of Resources and Ecology, Yili Normal University, Yining, Xinjiang 835000,China
2. College of Grassland and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2022-08-02 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-04-18
Correspondence author: LI Ning(1977-), male, born in Shandong Province, PhD, associate professor, mainly engaged in forage nutrition and fertilization, (E-mail)lining772@163.com
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(201511A019);Research projects in key disciplines of Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture's normal school Plant ecology(YLUPE2022YB07)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究磷水平对苜蓿根系形态和植株生长的影响,为苜蓿耐低磷机制的研究提供理论依据。【方法】在水培条件下,分析6种磷:0 μmol/L(P₁),50 μmol/L(P₂),100 μmol/L(P₃),250 μmol/L(P₄),500 μmol/L(P₅),1 000 μmol/L(P₆)水平对新牧1号苜蓿苗期根系性状、植株生长及养分积累的影响。【结果】随磷水平增加,根冠比显著降低(P<0.05),生物量先增加后减少,除P₄、P₅处理下株高无显著(P<0.05)差异外,其他各处理间均存在显著(P<0.05)差异,P₄处理下株高最高,为9.37 cm;P₂供磷水平下总根长、根表面积与根冠比均达到最大,分别为281.75 cm、20.78 cm²、1.13;6种磷水平下,地下部氮、磷、钾积累量均大于地上部积累量,P₅处理时更有利于苜蓿生长。【结论】低磷浓度能促进苜蓿根系生长,过高磷浓度则会抑制苜蓿生长,使植株高度下降,总根长、根表面积以及根冠比降低。

关键词: 磷水平; 苜蓿; 根系性状; 养分积累

Abstract:

【Objective】 Low soil available phosphorus content is one of the main factors restricting crop growth. This project aims to clarify the effect of phosphorus level on alfalfa root morphology and plant growth in the hope of providing a theoretical basis for the study of alfalfa tolerant mechanisms. 【Methods】 In this experiment, under hydroponic conditions, six kinds of phosphorus were analyzed, which were 0 umol/L (P₁), 50 umol/L (P₂), 100 umol/L (P₃), 250 umol/L (P₄), 500 umol/L (P₅), 1000 umol/L (P₆) levels affecting the root characteristics, plant growth and nutrient accumulation of Xinmu 1 alfalfa at the seedling stage.【Results】 With the increase of phosphorus level, the root-to-shoot ratio decreased significantly (P<0.05), and the biomass first increased and then decreased. Except for the P₄ and P₅ treatments, there was no significant difference in plant height (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference among other treatments (P<0.05). The plant height was the highest under P₄ treatment, which was 9.37 cm; the total root length, root surface area and root-to-shoot ratio reached the maximum under P₂ phosphorus supply level, which were 281.75 cm, 20.78 cm², and 1.13; 6 species, under the phosphorus level, the accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the ground were greater than the accumulation in the ground, and comprehensive comparison showed that the P₅ treatment was more conducive to alfalfa growth. 【Conclusion】 Low phosphorus concentration can promote the growth of alfalfa roots, while excessively high phosphorus concentration inhibits its growth, reduces plant height, total root length, root surface area and root-to-shoot ratio.

Key words: phosphorus level; alfalfa; root traits; nutrient accumulation

中图分类号:

S551.7

马红, 孟捷, 李宁. 磷水平对新牧1号苜蓿苗期根系形态和植株生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 750-756.

MA Hong, MENG Jie, LI Ning. Effects of Phosphorus Levels on Root Morphology and Plant Growth of Alfalfa Seedlings[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 750-756.

图/表 3

表1 改良的Hoagland营养液配方

Tab.1 Improved Hoagland nutrient solution formula

元素 Elements	化合物(分析纯) Compounds(AR)	含量 Concentration
大量元素 Major elements	四水硝酸钙 Ca(NO₃)₂·4H₂O	945 mg/L
	硝酸钾 KNO₃	506 mg/L
	硝酸铵 NH₄NO₃	80 mg/L
	硫酸镁 MgSO₄·7H₂O	493 mg/L
铁盐溶液 Na₂Fe-EDTA	七水硫酸亚铁 FeSO₄·7H₂O	5.56 g/L
铁盐溶液 Na₂Fe-EDTA	乙二胺四乙酸二钠 EDTA·Na	7.46 g/L
微量元素 Trace elements	碘化钾 KI	0.83 mg/L
	硼酸 H₃BO₃	6.2 mg/L
	硫酸锰 MnSO₄·4H₂O	22.3 mg/L
	硫酸锌 ZnSO₄·7H₂O	8.6 mg/L
	钼酸钠 Na₂MoO₄·2H₂O	0.25 mg/L
	硫酸铜 CuSO₄·5H₂O	0.025 mg/L
	氯化钴 CoCl₂·6H₂O	0.025 mg/L

图1 不同磷水平下苜蓿苗期根系生长变化注:图中不同小写字母表示同一指标在不同浓度处理下差异显著(P<0.05),下同

Fig.1 Effect of different phosphorus levels on root growth of alfalfa at seedling stage Note: Different lowercase letters indicated that the same index had significant difference under different concentration treatments (P<0.05),the same as below

图2 不同磷水平下苜蓿苗期植株生长与养分积累变化

Fig.2 Effects of different phosphorus levels on plant growth and nutrient accumulation during alfalfa seedling stage

参考文献 25

[1]	王洋, 崔国文, 尹航, 等. 施肥对紫花苜蓿生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3):793-803.
	WANG Yang, CUI Guowen, YIN Hang, et al. Effects of different fertilization schemes on alfalfa performance and nutritional quality[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 793-803.
[2]	李申岩. 施磷对紫花苜蓿根颈芽形成动态及产草量的影响[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2018.
	LI Shenyan. Effect of phosphorus application on crown bud formation and yield of alfalfa[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2018.
[3]	新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年鉴[J]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2013:377.
	Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook 2013[J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2013:377.
[4]	李向林, 何峰. 苜蓿营养与施肥[D]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013:118-120.
	LI Xianglin, HE Feng. Alfalfa Nutrition and Fertilization[D]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013: 118-120.
[5]	李智, 韩笑, 张一豪, 等. 棉花磷胁迫响应基因GhWRKY6克隆及功能分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(3):182-191.
	LI Zhi, HAN Xiao, ZHANG Yihao, et al. Cloning and functional analysis of a phosphorus stress response gene, GhWRKY6, in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(3): 182-191.
[6]	张福锁, 崔振岭, 王激清, 等. 中国土壤和植物养分管理现状与改进策略[J]. 植物学通报, 2007, 24(6):687-694.
	ZHANG Fusuo, CUI Zhenling, WANG Jiqing, et al. Current Status of soil and plant nutrient management in China and improvement strategies[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2007, 24(6): 687-694.
[7]	张可炜, 李坤朋, 刘治刚, 等. 磷水平对不同基因型玉米苗期磷吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(5):795-801.
	ZHANG Kewei, LI Kunpeng, LIU Zhigang, et al. Effects of phosphorus level on phosphorus absorption and utilization of different genotype maize seedlings[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2007, 13(5): 795-801.
[8]	Baker A, Ceasar S A, Palmer A J, et al. Replace, reuse, recycle: Improving the sustainable use of phosphorus by plants[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(12): 3523-3540. DOI PMID
[9]	栗振义, 张绮芯, 仝宗永, 等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种对低磷环境的形态与生理响应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20):3898-3907. DOI
	LI Zhenyi, ZHANG Qixin, TONG Zongyong, et al. Analysis of morphological and physiological responses to low Pi stress in different alfalfas[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(20): 3898-3907. DOI
[10]	严小龙, 廖红, 戈振扬, 等. 植物根构型特性与磷吸收效率[J]. 植物学通报, 2000, 17(6):511-519.
	YAN Xiaolong, LIAO Hong, GE Zhenyang, et al. Root architectural characteristics and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in plant[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2000, 17(6): 511-519.
[11]	赵静, 付家兵, 廖红, 等. 大豆磷效率应用核心种质的根构型性状评价[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(13):1249-1257.
	ZHAO Jing, FU Jiabing, LIAO Hong, et al. Evaluation of the root configuration of core germplasm using soybean phosphorus efficiency[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(13): 1249-1257.
[12]	冯琳, 顾惠敏, 叶祖鹏, 等. 不同基因型棉花根系对局部供磷的响应特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5):1303-1312.
	FENG Lin, GU Huimin, YE Zupeng, et al. Root response of different cotton genotypesto local phosphorus supply[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(5): 1303-1312.
[13]	李振松, 栗振义, 张绮芯, 等. 敖汉和维多利亚紫花苜蓿对低磷环境应激机制的比较[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1):50-59.
	LI Zhensong, LI Zhenyi, ZHANG Qixin, et al. Comparison of response mechanisms to low inorganic phosphate stress between alfalfa varieties Aohan and Victoria[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(1): 50-59.
[14]	高艳, 田秋英, 石凤翎, 等. 黄花苜蓿与蒺藜苜蓿对土壤低磷胁迫适应策略的比较研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6):632-640.
	GAO Yan, TIAN Qiuying, SHI Fengling, et al. Comparative studies on adaptive strategies of Medicago falcata and M. truncatula to phosphorus deficiency in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(6): 632-640. DOI URL
[15]	任立飞, 张文浩, 李衍素. 低磷胁迫对黄花苜蓿生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(3):242-249.
	REN Lifei, ZHANG Wenhao, LI Yansu. Effect of phosphorus deficiency on physiological properties of Medicago falcata[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(3): 242-249.
[16]	薛峥, 张昆, 唐海洋, 等. 营养水平对紫花苜蓿苗期根系生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5):951-956. DOI
	XUE Zheng, ZHANG Kun, TANG Haiyang, et al. Response of root growth to nutrient level in alfalfa seedling stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(5): 951-956.
[17]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:30-109.
	BAO Shidan. Soil Agrochemical Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 30-109.
[18]	罗佳, 候银莹, 程军回, 等. 低磷胁迫下不同磷效率基因型棉花的根系形态特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(12):2280-2289. DOI
	LUO Jia, HOU Yinying, CHENG Junhui, et al. Root morphological characteristics of cotton genotypes with different phosphorus efficiency under phosphorus stress[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(12): 2280-2289. DOI
[19]	官纪元, 樊卫国. 供磷水平对刺梨幼苗生长和养分含量及其相关生理指标的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(7):1315-1324.
	GUAN Jiyuan, FAN Weiguo. Effect of phosphorus supply on growth, nutrient content and related physiological indexes of Rosa roxburghii seedlings[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 1315-1324.
[20]	樊卫国, 罗燕. 不同磷水平下4种柑橘砧木的生长状况、根系形态和生理特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(3):534-545. DOI
	FAN Weiguo, LUO Yan. Growth status, root morphology and physiological characteristics of four citrus rootstocks under different phosphorus levels[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(3): 534-545. DOI
[21]	臧成凤, 樊卫国, 潘学军. 供磷水平对铁核桃实生苗生长、形态特征及叶片营养元素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(2):319-330.
	ZANG Chengfeng, FAN Weiguo, PAN Xuejun. Effect of phosphorus levels on growth, morphological characteristics and leaf element contents of Juglans sigillata dode seedlings[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2): 319-330.
[22]	樊卫国, 王立新. 不同供磷水平对纽荷尔脐橙幼树生长及叶片营养元素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(4):714-725.
	FAN Weiguo, WANG Lixin. Effect of different phosphorus levels on growth and leaf element contents of young newhall navel orange trees[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(4): 714-725.
[23]	栗振义. 紫花苜蓿对低磷胁迫的响应及相关miRNAs的功能分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2018.
	LI Zhenyi. Response of alfalfa to low phosphorus stress and functional analysis of related miRNAs[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018.
[24]	孙淼, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 等. 低磷胁迫对不同基因型棉花苗期根系形态及生理特性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(1):45-52.
	SUN Miao, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, et al. Effects of low phosphorus stress on root morphology and physiological characteristics of different cotton genotypes at the seedling stage[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(1): 45-52.
[25]	王琪, 徐程扬. 氮磷对植物光合作用及碳分配的影响[J]. 山东林业科技, 2005,(5):59-62.
	WANG Qi, XU Chengyang. Affects of nitrogen and phosphorus on plant photosynthesis and carbon partitioning[J]. Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2005, (5): 59-62.

磷水平对新牧1号苜蓿苗期根系形态和植株生长的影响

Effects of Phosphorus Levels on Root Morphology and Plant Growth of Alfalfa Seedlings

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[2]	王泽鹏, 梁志国, 刘胜尧, 贾宋楠, 范凤翠, 张哲, 杜凤焕, 秦勇. 不同施氮量对设施茄子产量、品质及养分积累的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 951-957.
[3]	周勃, 任海龙, 张龑, 高强, 徐麟, 邹集文. 金花菜与苜蓿属主要物种基因组SSR分布特征的比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2217-2223.
[4]	郭江龙, 高占林, 刘振宇, 窦亚楠, 安静杰, 刘忠宽, 党志红, 李耀发. 苜蓿盲蝽对紫花苜蓿植株生长和营养品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 1001-1008.
[5]	王冬梅, 潘洪生, 李海强, 丁瑞丰, 阿克旦・吾外士, 刘建, 李号宾. DNA分子检测技术定量评估捕食性天敌对棉蚜的控害功能[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2661-2667.
[6]	翟亚萍, 王绍明, 刘鸯, 杨盼, 张霞, 赵祥, 刘丹. 不同种植地苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落结构多样性差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(5): 955-964.
[7]	孟阿静, 齐莹莹, 吕彩霞, 邵华伟, 王新勇. 不同量黄腐酸配施微生物菌肥对玉米生长、养分积累及苗期光合特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2312-2319.
[8]	苏力合, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 宋磊, 俞雪, 贺婷婷, 马春晖. 自然覆雪对5个不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿越冬率及抗寒性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2122-2132.
[9]	马铁成, 张慧. 氮磷肥施量对阿苇灌区苜蓿生长指标和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8): 1535-1541.
[10]	窦晓丽, 胡文静, 刘凡, 林彩英, 李克梅. 新疆2种苜蓿叶斑病病原菌主要生物学特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(10): 1863-1870.
[11]	早热古丽·热合曼, 叶尔兰·对山别克, 万江春, 艾比布拉·伊马木. 添加香梨残次果汁渣对苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(6): 1136-1141.
[12]	张玲, 席琳乔, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 马春晖. 残次枣粉添加青贮苜蓿中微生物、发酵和营养品质动态规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(10): 1929-1938.
[13]	曹彪,白云岗,陈俊克,肖军. 不同灌水处理对寒旱区紫花苜蓿叶面积指数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(4): 737-745.
[14]	景鹏成,鲁为华,马春晖,张凡凡,王树林,靳省飞. 两种机械收获模式对苜蓿干草产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(3): 564-571.
[15]	任灵通, 赵俊威, 吴新春, 程敏, 张前兵, 吴昊, 于磊, 马春晖, 鲁为华. 灌溉定额分配及水磷耦合对滴灌苜蓿生长规律的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(1): 164-174.